10/23/2018Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 1
DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 23, 2018
MINUTES
The Des Plaines Planning and Zoning Board Meeting held its regularly-scheduled meeting on Tuesday,
October 23, 2018, at 7 p.m. in Room 102 of the Des Plaines Civic Center.
ZONING BOARD
Vice Chair Saletnik called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m. and read this evening’s case. Roll call was
conducted.
PRESENT: Bader, Catalano, Fowler, Saletnik, Schell
ABSENT: Hofherr, Szabo
ALSO PRESENT: Johanna Bye, AICP, Senior Planner/Community & Economic Development
Gale Cerabona/Recording Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Board Member Fowler, seconded by Board Member Catalano, to approve the
minutes of October 9, 2018, as presented.
AYES: Fowler, Catalano, Saletnik, Schell
NAYES: None
ABSTAIN: Bader
***MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY***
CALENDAR
A motion was made by Board Member Catalano, seconded by Board Member Bader, to approve the
2019 Proposed PZB Calendar as presented.
AYES: Catalano, Bader, Fowler, Saletnik, Schell
NAYES: None
***MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY***
PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no Public Comment.
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS
1. Address: Citywide Case 18-094-TA
The City of Des Plaines is requesting Text Amendments to the following sections of the 1998 Des
Plaines Zoning Code, as amended: (i) Section 12-7-1(C), Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards,
to amend and clarify those structures and uses permitted in required yards; (ii) Section 12-7-1(J),
Residential Bulk Matrix, to add Maximum Rear Yard Coverage requirements for the R-1 district;
(iii) Section 12-8-1, Accessory Uses and Structures, to amend the number and size of accessory
structures permitted per zoning lot; (iv) Section 12-13-3, Definition of Terms, to add definitions
for Rear Yard Coverage, Yard Feature and Recreational Equipment and amend the definition of
Accessory Use and Structure; and (v) Section 12-12-10, Light, to clarify performance standards
pertaining to light spillage onto adjoining properties.
PIN: Citywide
Petitioner: City of Des Plaines, 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016
Owner: City of Des Plaines, 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016
Vice Chair Saletnik asked Staff to explain the Text Amendment. Senior Planner Bye gave the Staff
Report; a Rear-Yard Coverage Diagram was distributed:
Issue: The City of Des Plaines is requesting Text Amendments to the following sections of the
1998 Des Plaines Zoning Code, as amended: (i) Section 12-7-1(C), Permitted Obstructions in
Required Yards, to amend and clarify those structures and uses permitted in required yards; (ii)
Section 12-7-1(J), Residential Bulk Matrix, to add Maximum Rear Yard Coverage requirements for
the R-1 district; (iii) Section 12-8-1, Accessory Uses and Structures, to amend the number and size
of accessory structures permitted per zoning lot; (iv) Section 12-13-3, Definition of Terms, to add
definitions for Rear Yard Coverage, Yard Feature and Recreational Equipment and amend the
definition of Accessory Use and Structure; and (v) Section 12-12-10, Light, to clarify performance
standards pertaining to light spillage onto adjoining properties.
Analysis:
PIN: Citywide
Petitioner: City of Des Plaines, 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016
Case Number: #18-094-TA
Project Description: The City of Des Plaines is proposing several text amendments to
the Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance which are as follows:
• Amending the Residential Bulk Matrix to add Maximum Rear
Yard Lot Coverage requirements for the R-1 zoning district;
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 3
• Amending and Adding to the Permitted Obstruction Matrix
in Required Yards;
• Amending the Accessory Uses and Structures section of the
Zoning Ordinance;
• Amending the performance standards for exterior lighting;
• Amending or adding the following terms to the Definition
section of the Zoning Ordinance:
o Amending the definition of “Accessory Use and
Structure”;
o Adding definition for “Recreational Equipment”;
o Adding definition for “Yard Feature”; and
o Adding definition for “Rear Yard Coverage”.
Updating the Residential Bulk Matrix
Zoning Ordinance Section 12-7-2(J) identifies the bulk regulations that buildings and structures
have to comply with for properties zoned residential. Staff is proposing a new bulk regulation
regarding the amount of impervious coverage allowed in rear yards of properties zoned R-1. There
have been documented concerns of flooding in backyards throughout the City. Backyard flooding
can be caused by a multitude of factors including the amount of impervious surfaces in residential
rear yards. To assist with reducing potential run-off, staff is proposing the following text
amendment for “Maximum Rear Yard Coverage”:
12-7-2.J:
Add:
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS BULK MATRIX
Bulk Controls R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4
Maximum Rear
Yard Coverage 60%2 n/a n/a n/a
Notes:
2. To determine rear yard coverage for a detached single-family residential
property, the area of the rear yard shall be the horizontal distance of the lot
taken from the rear-most elevation of the principal building multiplied by the
distance from the rear-most elevation of the principal structure to the rear lot
line. For irregularly shaped lots, the area of the rear yard shall start from the
rear-most elevation of the principal building and cover all areas of the property
from this elevation to the rear lot line(s) of the subject property. Please see
Chapter 13, definition of “Rear Yard Coverage” for improvements that are
calculated under this regulation.
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 4
Several other communities have some regulation on maximum lot coverage or rear yard
coverage to assist with maintaining open space and regulating the level of run-off from
impervious surfaces. Over time, maintaining a level of open space throughout all properties
zoned R-1 will assist with reducing flooding. Note, this regulation is only being proposed for
R-1 properties as larger developments such as townhomes, condominiums and apartment
communities have to provide on-site detention or retention based on the Water Reclamation
District’s Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO). The WMO does not cover detached
single-family residences unless it is part of a larger subdivision over a certain acreage. To assist
with understanding the proposed regulation compared to other nearby communities, please
see the various regulations from nearby communities:
• Hanover Park - Maximum Lot Coverage = 35%
• Elk Grove Village - Maximum Ground (Lot) Coverage = 35%
• River Grove - Maximum Lot Coverage = 50%
• Prospect Heights - Maximum Lot Coverage = 25%
• Franklin Park - Maximum Rear Yard Coverage = 50%
As shown in the list of communities above, there is a wide array of lot or rear yard coverage
regulations. Staff carefully assessed other communities and the current build-out status of
Des Plaines when proposing this regulation.
Enhancing the Permitted Obstruction Matrix
Zoning Ordinance Section 12-7-1(C) contains a list of property improvements that are allowed to
either be located in a required yard or project into a required yard. This table does not cover all
scenarios which requires staff to consistently interpret the Zoning Ordinance for non-identified
improvements. The text amendment below proposes to enhance this matrix by listing out specific
uses and structures so that all scenarios are contemplated:
12-7-1.J:
New Proposed Text:
PERMITTED OBSTRUCTION MATRIX
Required Yards
Front Side Rear
Accessory Structures
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP P P
ADA Accessible Improvements
• May be located no closer than 1 foot from all lot lines
P P P
Awnings and Canopies P P P
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 5
• May project 18 inches or less, except for awnings identified in
Chapter 11 of this Article
Balconies
• May project 3 feet or less only
• Allowed to project on all sides in the R-4 and C-5 district
• In all instances, no balcony shall project over a property line
NP NP P
Bay Windows
• Only one-story eaves may project into required yards
• May project 3 feet or less only
P NP P
Chimneys
• May project 18 inches or less only
NP P P
Covered or Open Decks, Porches, and Landings
• May encroach no farther than 5 feet into required front and rear
yards
• The maximum area of a deck, porch, or landing that encroaches into
the required front yard is 50 square feet
• May encroach no farther than 3 feet into required side yards
• Eaves on encroaching covered decks, porches, or landings may not
extend an additional 2 feet
P P P
Eaves and Gutters
• May project 2 feet or less only
P P P
Fences
• Refer to Section 12-8-2 of this code for specific fence regulations
P P P
Flagpoles
• May be no taller than 20’ in residential districts
• May be no taller than 40’ in non-residential districts
P P P
HVAC, Generators, and Similar Building Mechanical Equipment
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP P P
Patios
• Must be separated from a driveway/parking area by a minimum of
3 feet
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP P P
Pergolas
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP P P
Recreational Equipment1
• Basketball hoops shall not overhang into any alley or public right-of-
way
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP P P
Seating Walls as part of a patio or deck
• Total height for any seating wall shall not exceed 4 feet from
finished grade when located in a front yard
• May not encroach in the required front yard more than 5 feet
• May be located no closer than 3 feet from side lot lines May be
located no closer than 5 feet from rear lot lines
P P P
Steps P P P
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 6
• 4 feet or less above grade, which are necessary for access to a
permitted building or for access to a zoning lot from a street or
alley
Swimming Pools
• May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
NP NP P
Walkways
• All walkways, whether within a required yard or the buildable area,
can be no more than 4 feet wide
• Must be separated from a driveway by a minimum of 3 feet (with
the exception of a perpendicular connection)
• May be located no closer than 2 feet from the side lot lines
P P P
Window Wells
• May be located no closer than 1 foot from any lot lines
P P P
Yard Features2
• Arbors and trellises:
o May not exceed 8 feet in height
o May be located no closer than 1 foot from all lot lines
o If located in a front yard, must be constructed in such a manner
so as to provide at least fifty percent (50%) open "see through"
area of uniform distribution
• All other yard features:
o May not exceed 4 feet in height when located in the required
front yard
o May not encroach in the required front yard more than 5 feet
o May be located no closer than 5 feet from side and rear lot lines
P P P
Notes:
1. There is no limit to the number of recreation equipment items allowed on any
lot. However, any recreational equipment that adds impervious surface will
count towards the maximum rear yard coverage for properties zoned R-1.
2. Yard Features, except for arbors and trellises, do not require a permit unless
electrical and/or a foundation is required for installation.
Please see Attachment #1 for the current Permitted Obstruction Matrix for comparison
purposes. The proposed text matrix enhances the type of improvements covered, including
new additions such as yard features and window wells. Updating this matrix will assist with
regulating the location of proposed improvements that are in-keeping with development
patterns and provide clarity to staff when reviewing such improvements.
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 7
Amending the Number and Size of Accessory Structures Permitted
Section 12-8-1(C) of the Zoning Ordinance identifies bulk standards for accessory structures.
However, the regulations presented in this section of the code are vague and contradictory.
Staff proposes the following amendments:
12-8-1: ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES:
C. The bulk standards for accessory structures shall be as set forth below:
1. The maximum height of an accessory structure shall be fifteen feet (15').
2. The minimum front yard setback for an accessory structure shall be the front building
line of the principal structure.
3. The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an accessory structure shall be five feet
(5'). However, a detached accessory garage for a residential use in the R-1 and R-2
residential districts may be located on the rear lot line where the rear lot line abuts an
alley.
4. The maximum number of accessory structures permitted for any use shall be two (2);
however, there shall be no more than one accessory garage (attached or detached) per
residential dwelling. (Ord. Z-8-98, 9-21-1998)
5. The maximum total area of a detached accessory structure garage shall be seven
hundred twenty (720) square feet or less. However, where a lot contains an attached
accessory garage, the additional accessory structure shall have the maximum total area
of The maximum area of an accessory structure other than a detached garage shall be
one hundred fifty (150) square feet or less. (Ord. Z-7-05, 5-16-2005)
6. No detached accessory building or buildings shall occupy more than fifty percent
(50%) of the area of a required rear yard. (Ord. Z-8-98, 9-21-1998)
The proposed changes help to clarify that two accessory structures are permitted per lot, though
only one of these may be a detached garage. Only detached garages may go up to 720 square feet
in area; all other accessory structures (sheds, greenhouses, etc.) may be no larger than 150 square
feet in area. In a situation where there is no detached garage, two accessory structures are
permitted (e.g., two sheds), but each may be no larger than 150 square feet.
Section 12-8-1(C)6 has been eliminated, as staff is proposing a Rear Yard Coverage that will restrict
the amount of impervious surface permitted in a rear yard in the R-1 district.
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 8
Adding & Amending Definitions
There are no current definitions for Rear Yard Coverage, Yard Feature, or Recreational
Equipment in Section 12-13-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff proposes the following:
REAR YARD COVERAGE: The amount of impervious surface as a percentage of the
total rear yard area. To determine rear yard coverage for a detached single-family
residential property, the area of the rear yard shall be the horizontal distance of
the lot taken from the rear-most elevation of the principal building multiplied by
the distance from the rear-most elevation of the principal structure to the rear lot
line. For irregularly shaped lots, the area of the rear yard shall start from the rear-
most elevation of the principal building and cover all areas of the property from
this elevation to the rear lot line(s) of the subject property. Any improvement that
contains dust-free hard surface and any building or structure with a roof shall
count towards the rear yard coverage.
YARD FEATURE: Objects and features, including arbors, trellises, gazing balls, bird
baths, statues, wishing wells, ornamental lights, and other similar features,
intended to be used for aesthetic or practical purposes.
RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT: A facility, structure, or device, including play houses,
swing sets, trampolines, sand boxes, game courts, or other similar features,
intended for recreational and athletic use.
Currently, the definition for Accessory Use and Structure is as follows:
ACCESSORY USE AND STRUCTURE: A structure or use that: a) is subordinate to and
serves a principal building or a principal use; b) is subordinate in area, extent, and
purpose to the principal structure or principal use served; c) contributes to the
comfort, convenience, or necessity of the occupants, business, or industry of the
principal structure or principal use served; and d) is located on the same lot as the
principal structure or principal use served, except as otherwise expressly authorized
by the provision of this title. Accessory parking facilities may be authorized to be
located elsewhere. An accessory structure attached to a principal building in a
substantial manner by a wall or roof shall be considered part of the principal
building.
Staff recommends that for simplification, accessory structures and accessory uses each have
their own definition. Staff proposes the following:
ACCESSORY USE: A use which is located on the same zoning lot as a principal use
and is incidental and subordinate to the principal use.
ACCESSORY USE AND STRUCTURE: A structure which is detached from a principal
structure and is located on the same zoning lot and incidental and subordinate to
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 9
the principal structure. Accessory structures are characterized by having a solid
roof, and include, but are not limited to, detached garages, sheds, greenhouses,
and gazebos. Accessory structures may not exceed the height of the principal
structure.
These proposed new definitions and the proposed amendment to the definition for
Accessory Uses and Structures allow for clarity and ease of regulation.
Clarifying Performance Standards for Light Spillage
Chapter 12 of the Zoning Ordinance identifies performance standards in areas such as odor,
noise, and vibration. Section 12-12-10 pertains to lights, and states the following:
12-12-10: LIGHT:
All off street parking areas with lighting shall limit light spillage onto adjacent property.
Maximum horizontal foot-candles as given off by the neighboring property as measured
in the following districts shall not exceed:
Districts Foot-Candles
Single-family residential districts 0.1
Multiple-family residential districts 0.2
Commercial districts 2.0
Manufacturing and institutional districts 5.0
(Ord. Z-14-15, 7-6-2015)
It has been standard practice to apply these foot-candle maximums to the entirety of a
property, not just a parking area (e.g., lights on a building would need to meet these same
standards). Staff proposes the language of this section be amended to state the following:
12-12-10: LIGHT:
All structures, properties and off-street parking areas with outdoor lighting shall limit
light spillage onto adjacent property. Maximum horizontal foot-candles as given off by
the neighboring property as measured in the following districts shall not exceed:
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 10
Districts Foot-Candles
Single-family residential districts 0.1
Multiple-family residential districts 0.2
Commercial districts 2.0
Manufacturing and institutional districts 5.0
(Ord. Z-14-15, 7-6-2015)
Note, staff does not propose changes to the actual foot-candles permitted at the lot lines.
Standards for Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment:
To analyze this text amendment request, the standards for amendments contained in Section 12-
3-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance are used. Following is a discussion of those standards.
1. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of
the comprehensive plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the city council;
The 2007 Comprehensive Plan contains an Implementation Goal and Objective which states
the following:
GOAL:
Amend and enforce City Ordinances, as appropriate to support the purposes
of the Plan.
OBJECTIVE:
a. Revise the City’s zoning ordinance, so as to plan for and implement
redevelopment in neighborhoods, commercial corridors, and the
industrial sector.
This Comprehensive Plan section applies to all of the proposed text amendments. The
overarching goal of this text amendment application is to clarify, enhance, and modernize the
20-year-old Zoning Ordinance. In general, the aforementioned text amendments assist with
enhancing our accessory structure regulations, clarifying specific regulations for small-scale
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 11
improvements, clarifying the lighting regulations under the performance standards, and adding
definitions to assist with interpretation and enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with current conditions and the overall
character of existing development;
The proposed text amendments help to modernize the Zoning Ordinance and ensure the
proposed amendments are compatible with the overall character of existing development. The
enhancement and clarification to accessory structures and location regulations on small-scale
improvements will assist with enforcing the Zoning Ordinance and maintain the overall
character of existing development. Additionally, the enhancement of the lighting regulations
under performance standards will further help address any light glare concerns.
3. Whether the proposed amendment is appropriate considering the adequacy of public
facilities and services available to this subject property;
All proposed amendments are not anticipated to impact public facilities and available services.
4. Whether the proposed amendment will have an adverse effect on the value of properties
throughout the jurisdiction; and
All proposed amendments will not have an adverse effect on property values throughout the
City. City staff is proposing these text amendments to further assist with interpretation and
enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance, which in turn will mitigate any potential adverse effect
on property values.
5. Whether the proposed amendment reflects responsible standards for development and
growth.
The proposed text amendments take into account responsible standards for growth and
development. The proposed amendment to add a maximum rear yard coverage to detached
single-family homes will assist with flood reduction efforts. The enhancement of the Permitted
Obstruction Matrix will assist with regulating small-scale improvements that were not
previously identified in the Zoning Ordinance. This, in turn, will assist with streamlining our
Zoning Ordinance and reducing interpretation conflicts. The enhancements to the accessory
structure section of the Zoning Ordinance will help to clarify this code section. The addition and
modification of various definitions further enhances the accessory structure regulations within
the Zoning Ordinance and defines new terminology to eliminate confusion with enforcing this
code. Finally, the clarification to the light regulations under performance standards will
enhance our enforcement for light glare concerns.
Recommendation: The Community and Economic Development Department recommends
approval of the proposed text amendments to the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 12
amended: (i) Section 12-7-1(C), Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards, to amend and clarify
those structures and uses permitted in required yards; (ii) Section 12-7-1(J), Residential Bulk
Matrix, to add Maximum Rear Yard Coverage requirements for the R-1 district; (iii) Section 12-8-
1, Accessory Uses and Structures, to amend the number and size of accessory structures
permitted per zoning lot; (iv) Section 12-13-3, Definition of Terms, to add definitions for Rear Yard
Coverage, Yard Feature and Recreational Equipment and amend the definition of Accessory Use
and Structure; and (v) Section 12-12-10, Light, to clarify performance standards pertaining to light
spillage onto adjoining properties.
Planning & Zoning Board Procedure: Pursuant to Sections 12-3-7(D)3 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the Planning and Zoning Board may vote to recommend approval, approval with modifications, or
disapproval. The City Council has final authority over the Text Amendments.
Board Member Fowler asked Staff if they are proposing one could have up to 60% lot coverage in
the rear yard, with 40% open space, or the opposite. Senior Planner Bye advised – one could build
up to 60% impervious surface with 40% green space.
Board Member Catalano asked if a deck is okay, but not a patio? Senior Planner Bye advised – a
deck is considered in this coverage.
Board Member Schell asked, regarding obstructions in required yards, where the requirements
came from. Senior Planner Bye advised – these proposed amendments are based off of what we
see residents come in for permits for. Some are new regulations, and some are existing. Many
improvements requested by residents are not addressed in the zoning ordinance, which leaves it
open to interpretation. Staff is trying to provide clarity for consistency purposes.
Vice Chair Saletnik:
• asked about flagpoles. Senior Planner Bye advised – flagpoles are not currently permitted
in front yards; this is a new change. Flagpoles are addressed in the signs section of the
code and residential flagpoles can be 20 ft. in height and commercial flagpoles can be 40
ft. in height.
• inquired about bay windows in a side yard. Senior Planner Bye advised – she will highlight
as stated.
• asked how the 60% was derived. Senior Planner Bye stated – this is a reasonable number
however other percentages could be considered and discussed. Board Member Catalano
stated 60% is considerably higher (he referenced page 2 of the Staff Report). Senior
Planner Bye stated – others are general lot coverage, not just pertaining to the rear yard.
Board Member Schell stated he would like to see what the existing code is vs. a new changes.
Senior Planner Bye advised – she is happy to revise as such and continue this to the next meeting.
She can break down the proposed new Permitted Obstruction Matrix line by line so that it is clear
what is an existing regulation and what is new.
Board Member Fowler asked about what Park Ridge, Prospect Heights, and other suburbs
surrounding the city are doing. Board Member Schell concurred. Senior Planner Bye stated – she
will obtain this information and add it to the list of communities already provided in the staff
report.
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 13
Senior Planner Bye noted a typo. She stated, on page 6, the definition title for Accessory Use and
Structure should just state Accessory Structure.
Board Member Catalano asked, under Recreational Equipment, if these would require permits.
Senior Planner Bye referred to page 4; some items do not need permits. She noted this is being
clarified as questions arise so there’s no confusion. Residents inquire about where these types of
structures can be located, and staff wants to make sure there is consistency among the responses.
Board Member Fowler asked, regarding basketball hoops in the front yard, what if there’s a
driveway? Senior Planner Bye stated this is not addressed and will be clarified if that is proposed
to be allowed.
Board Member Schell asked if a trampoline could be in a front yard. Senior Planner Bye stated –
this is prohibited in a front yard.
Vice Chair Saletnik asked about something permanent vs. something that’s moveable/temporary.
Senior Planner Bye inquired if Recreational Equipment should be further broken down along these
lines.
Board Member Fowler asked about an inflatable pool. Senior Planner Bye stated this would be
clarified.
Board Member Schell asked if the section on ramps is ADA compliant. Senior Planner Bye advised
– yes.
Senior Planner Bye stated she would further clarify items and call out existing vs. new regulations.
Vice Chair Saletnik asked how lights are policed on adjacent properties. Senior Planner Bye
advised – with new commercial properties, measurements are checked. If there are complaints,
a Code Inspector will take light readings at the property lines.
Vice Chair Saletnik asked if anyone in the audience is in favor or objects to this proposal. He swore
in the following who came forward:
• C. Reschke 1328 Henry
Ms. Reschke noted her concerns:
o regarding light spillage, there is a street lamp that shines directly in her home.
How can that be reduced?
o What about a motion detector? Is this permissible?
Senior Planner Bye advised – she believes it is permitted but should be shielded
so that there is no direct glare into a neighboring property.
o regarding rear decks, is it 5 ft. from the house?
Case #18-094-TA Citywide – Text Amendment
October 23, 2018
Page 14
Vice Chair Saletnik noted --- it’s 5 ft. from the lot line. Senior Planner Bye further
explained.
o What is a permeable covering? She noted they dump the snow and salt on the
grass. Ms. Reschke advised she considers pavers to have holes.
Senior Planner Bye stated – those would be considered impermeable and cited
an example.
Vice Chair Saletnik asked if the Board has other questions.
A motion was made by Board Member Schell, seconded by Board Member Bader, to continue this
matter to the next PZB meeting.
AYES: Schell, Bader, Catalano, Fowler, Saletnik
NAYES: None
***MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY***
ADJOURNMENT
The next agenda is scheduled for November 13, 2018.
A motion was made by Board Member Fowler, seconded by Board Member Catalano, to adjourn the
meeting at 7:38 p.m. On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously.
Sincerely,
Gale Cerabona, Recording Secretary
cc: City Officials, Aldermen, Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioners