Loading...
12/12/2017Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 1 DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 12, 2017 MINUTES The Des Plaines Planning and Zoning Board Meeting held its regularly-scheduled meeting on Tuesday, December 12, 2017, at 7 p.m. in Room 102 of the Des Plaines Civic Center. ZONING BOARD PRESENT: Bader, Catalano, Fowler, Hofherr, Saletnik, Schell, Szabo ALSO PRESENT: Johanna Bye, AICP, Senior Planner/Community & Economic Development Pat Ainsworth, Coordinator/Community & Economic Development Gale Cerabona/Recording Secretary Chairman Szabo called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and read this evening’s cases. Roll call was conducted. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Board Member Hofherr to approve the minutes of November 28, 2017, as written. Board Member Fowler seconded the motion. AYES: Bader, Catalano, Fowler, Hofherr, Saletnik, Schell NAYES: None ABSTAIN: Szabo ***MOTION CARRIED 6-0*** PUBLIC COMMENT There were no comments. PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS 1. Address: 1345 E. Golf Road Case 17-102-CU The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow the expansion of an existing Childcare Center in the C-3 General Commercial District. PINs: 09-17-200-126-0000; 09-17-200-039-0000 Petitioner: Amy Fehrmann, 8401 W. Johanna Drive, Niles, IL 60714 Owner: Michael Van Slambrouk, 16 Mary Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 2 Chairman Szabo swore in Amy Fehrmann, 8401 W. Johanna Drive, Niles, IL who advised she is operating 3 classrooms at 1345 E. Golf Road and adding 3 additional classrooms (for 6 to 9 month-old infants, 9-15 month olds, 15-24 month olds, 2-4 year olds, and 3-6 year olds). She noted this would increase students from 47 to 77. It was noted there is a waitlist. Chairman Szabo asked if the Board has any questions. No one responded. He asked Staff to provide the Staff Report which Senior Planner Bye did: Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow the expansion of an existing Childcare Center in the C-3 General Commercial District. Analysis: Address: 1345 E. Golf Road Owner: Michael Van Slambrouk, 16 Mary Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Petitioner: Amy Fehrmann, 8401 W. Johanna Drive, Niles, IL 60714 Case Number: 17-102-CU Real Estate Index Numbers: 09-17-200-126-0000; 09-17-200-039-0000 Ward: #1, Alderman Mark Lysakowski Existing Zoning: C-3 General Commercial District Existing Land Use: Commercial/Light Industrial Surrounding Zoning: North: I-1 Institutional District South: M-1 Limited Manufacturing District East: C-2 Limited Office Commercial District West: C-2 Limited Office Commercial District Surrounding Land Use: North: Medical Office South: Industrial East: Commercial/Industrial West: Vacant Street Classification: Golf Road is an arterial street; Mary Street is a local street Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Community Commercial See Me Grow and Learn Infant Child Development Center has requested to amend their 2014 Conditional Use Permit to expand their existing daycare operations at 1345 E. Golf Road. Currently, the daycare occupies approximately 4,000 square feet within a multi-use building in the C-3 General Commercial District. The petitioner proposes to expand into an additional 4,500 square feet to the south of the existing operations. In addition to the daycare, the building is currently occupied with a printing company, trade contactor storage (landscaping), and an office/warehouse space. Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 3 At present, See Me Grow and Learn has 3 main classrooms and is open 6:30am to 6:00pm, Monday through Friday. Each classroom serves a different age group: infants (6 weeks to 14 months), toddlers (15 months to 3 years), and preschoolers (3 to 6 years). The daycare follows all DCFS standards for child ratios per classroom and caregivers and currently serves up to 48 children with 8 teachers. The petitioner is requesting an expansion of the current facility in order to serve up to 77 children with 13 teachers and proposes to add two full bathrooms, additional closet storage, a staff break/classroom, indoor gym, and 3 additional classrooms. Four classrooms would be assigned to children under the age of 24 months, as this is the age group the petitioner sees the highest demand for in the community. The hours and days of operation would remain the same. The petitioner proposes to alter the outdoor play area by changing the fence so that it encloses a new walkway from the expansion. The petitioner also proposes to add a concrete slab in the play area for additional space to ride bikes and enjoy wagon rides. To create a safe infant and toddler playground, the petitioner will enclose about 1,000 square feet of the current play area with an additional fence so that children under the age of 2 will have a separate space to play. Additionally, a proposed new indoor play area will allow children to play and use their muscles when they cannot get outside due to poor weather. Currently, See Me Grow and Learn has access to 11 parking spaces, which the petitioner has stated they do not have any challenges with. With the proposed expansion, the petitioner will gain 7 parking spaces, for a total of 18 (the exact amount required by code for the use; 1 parking space per every 15 children and 1 parking space per employee is required). The traffic study, completed by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.), found that the additional traffic created by the expansion will not have a negative impact on traffic conditions in the area. The report does suggest that employees of the daycare park in the spaces to the south along Mary Street in order to keep the spaces closest to the facility free for pick-up and drop-off of children. The petitioner has stated that they will comply with these recommendations. Conditional Use Findings: Conditional Use requests are subject to the standards set forth in Section 12-3- 4(E) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. In reviewing these standards, staff has the following comments regarding the proposed Conditional Use under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow the expansion of a Childcare Center in the C-3 General Commercial District: A. The proposed Conditional Use is in fact a Conditional Use established within the specific Zoning district involved: Comment: A Childcare Center is a Conditional Use in the C-3 General Commercial District, as specified in Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. B. The proposed Conditional Use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan: Comment: The 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for the site. C. The proposed Conditional Use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity: Comment: The proposed Childcare Center expansion would utilize the existing brick building; no additions or exterior changes to the structure beyond the addition of a door are proposed. The minimal site improvements required will not be visible from the street. D. The proposed Conditional Use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboring uses: Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 4 Comment: The proposed Childcare Center expansion is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboring uses, as it creates little noise and traffic. E. The proposed Conditional Use is to be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or, agencies responsible for establishing the Conditional Use shall provide adequately any such services: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed Childcare Center expansion would be served adequately by essential public facilities and would not overburden existing public services. F. The proposed Conditional Use does not create excessive additional requirements at public expense for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic well- being of the entire community: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed Childcare Center expansion would appear to have adequate public facilities; it would not create a burden on public facilities nor would it be a detriment to the economic well-being of the community. G. The proposed Conditional Use does not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glare or odors: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed Childcare Center expansion is not anticipated to create significant traffic or noise that could be detrimental to surrounding land uses. While increased traffic and safe pick-up and drop-off of children may be a concern, the traffic study provided confirms that the expansion of the existing facility will not have a negative impact on the existing conditions in the area. H. The proposed Conditional Use provides vehicular access to the property designed so that it does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares: Comment: Currently, the Childcare Center has access to 11 parking spaces, which the petitioner has stated they do not have any challenges with. With the proposed expansion, the petitioner will gain seven parking spaces, for a total of 18 (the exact amount required by code for the use). The traffic study, completed by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.), found that the additional traffic created by the expansion will not have a negative impact on traffic conditions in the area. The report does suggest that employees of the daycare park in the spaces to the south along Mary Street in order to keep the spaces closest to the facility free for pick-up and drop-off of children. The petitioner has stated that they will comply with these recommendations. I. The proposed Conditional Use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of natural, scenic, or historic features of major importance: Comment: The proposed Childcare Center expansion would utilize an existing brick structure. The proposed plan would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic or historic features of major importance. J. The proposed Conditional Use complies with all additional regulations in the Zoning Ordinance specific to the Conditional Use requested: Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 5 Comment: The proposed Conditional Use complies with all additional regulations in the Zoning Ordinance. No variations are required. Recommendation: I recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of See Me Grow and Learn, based on a review of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 12-3-4(E) (Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Childcare Center expansion will not negatively affect the surrounding area and per the traffic study, traffic and parking will be adequately managed and provided for. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Sections 12-3-4(D) (Procedure for Review and Decision for Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of a Childcare Center in the C-3 General Commercial District. The City Council has final authority on the proposal. Chairman Szabo asked if anyone is in favor or opposed to this proposal. No one responded. He commented that this seems to be very successful, and asked what the magic is. Ms. Fehrmann stated the business is very family-oriented, a welcoming atmosphere, comfortable, with open communication. A motion was made by Board Member Hofherr, seconded by Board Member Schell, to recommend approval to City Council for the expansion of the Day Care Center. AYES: Bader, Catalano, Fowler, Hofherr, Saletnik, Schell, Szabo NAYES: None ***MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY*** Chairman Szabo advised a recommendation for approval would be submitted to City Council. 2. Address: 676 N. Wolf Road Case 17-104-CU The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow a Domestic Pet Service (dog daycare) in the C-3 General Commercial District. PIN: 09-07-210-047-0000 Petitioners: Michelle Janczak/Cathy Schilling, 1008 E. Ironwood Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Owner: JWG LTD Partnership Designated Series MG, 310 Busse Highway, Suite 361, Park Ridge, IL 60068 Chairman Szabo swore in Michelle Janczak, 1008 E. Ironwood Drive, Mount Prospect, IL & Cathy Schilling, 1646 River Street, Des Plaines, IL. Ms. Schilling advised they are hoping to develop a Dog Day Care. She stated she is a nurse and gave background on how this partnership came about. Ms. Schilling reported this space (4,300 sq. ft.) is ideal in a strip mall as it has parking, is accessible, etc. She noted an outdoor area for bathroom breaks will be implemented in the front of the building. A system filtering into the sewer will be installed. They are both certified in Dog CPR. This may grow into overnight housing and grooming. Chairman Szabo asked if the Board has questions. Board Member Hofherr asked/clarified: • regarding the address, it is 676 N. Wolf Road. Ms. Schilling concurred. Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 6 • if there will be any dog care in the rear space. Ms. Janczak said no. • if there will be real or synthetic sod. Ms. Janczak stated – possibly synthetic sod. There is a drain and hose nearby for removal of waste. There will be a PVC fence installed. • if Staff recommends a 6 ft. wood fence. Ms. Schilling stated a vinyl fence will not degrade as much as wood; possibly a decorative and durable fence. Board Member Fowler asked if fencing would be around the building. Ms. Schilling stated the fencing will be around the outdoor dog area. Board Member Saletnik asked if the dog run would be on pavement only or further north than the existing building. Ms. Schilling stated on pavement near existing loading dock. Ms. Janczak advised it would be 40 ft. out beyond the existing double-doors from the loading dock into the parking lot on the pavement. Board Member Saletnik referred to Page 11 (of 17) and Attachment 5. Petitioners Janczak and Schilling illustrated the location; fencing is even with end of parking stalls that are right in front of the tenant space. Chairman Szabo asked if there is space between the guardrail and the fence. Ms. Schilling advised – yes. There is a space of several feet to get from the front to the rear of the building. Board Member Fowler asked why Petitioners aren’t going further north of the building to the property line. Ms. Schilling stated they thought they would leave the existing walkway from the rear to the front of the building clear. Senior Planner Bye referred to space near residents in rear, and stated it is not a true alley (all private property). Board Member Saletnik stated/asked: • the area behind the building may work for an outdoor dog area. Ms. Schilling advised that was their initial intent but after talking with Staff, there was concern for the residential neighbors to the west. • how many dogs are in the outdoor area simultaneously. Ms. Janczak advised – 8-10, not for playing, just to do their business. She stated they are fine placing the dog run in either place. Chairman Szabo asked: • if there will be an emergency gate. Ms. Janczak advised – yes. • where? Ms. Janczak advised – on the north side. • in the interior, if there is drywall for a noise buffer. Ms. Janczak advised – yes. Chairman Szabo asked Staff to provide the Staff Report which Senior Planner Bye did: Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow a Domestic Pet Service (dog daycare) in the C-3 General Commercial District. Analysis: Address: 676 N. Wolf Road Owners: JWG LTD Partnership Designated Series MG, 310 Busse Highway, Suite 361, Park Ridge, IL 60068 Petitioner: Michelle Janczak/Cathy Schilling, 1008 E. Ironwood Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Case Number: 17-104-CU Real Estate Index Number: 09-07-210-047-0000 Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 7 Ward: #7, Alderman Don Smith Existing Zoning: C-3 General Commercial District Existing Land Use: Commercial Surrounding Zoning: North: C-3 General Commercial District South: C-3 General Commercial District East: C-3 General Commercial District West: R-3 Townhouse Residential District Surrounding Land Use: North: Commercial (gas station) South: Commercial (restaurant) East: Commercial (shopping center) West: Residential (townhomes) Street Classification: Wolf Road is a collector street Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Community Commercial The petitioners, Michelle Janczak and Cathy Schilling, have requested a Conditional Use Permit in order to operate a Domestic Pet Service at 676 Wolf Road. The petitioners propose to operate a dog daycare, Playtime Pup Ranch, from the roughly 4,300 square foot tenant space in Wolf Shopping Center. In the future, additional services, including overnight boarding, grooming, and food and pet supplies retail, may be offered. Playtime Pup Ranch would operate Monday through Saturday, 6:30am to 6:30pm. The petitioners anticipate that most drop-offs would take place between 7:00am and 9:00am and that most pick-ups would take place between 4:30pm and 6:30pm. At full capacity, 30 dogs could be accommodated daily. The petitioners propose to construct an outdoor dog run adjacent to the northern end of the building for the dogs to use for bathroom breaks. 8-10 dogs would be let into this area at a time, and dogs would be let out 3-4 times per day. Dogs who are in the outdoor space would always be monitored by staff and would not be left unattended. To start, there would be 2 employees daily, with additional staff added as the business grows. Staff would like clarification from the petitioner as to the location of the proposed outdoor area. While the site plan shows a 40’ by 11’ outdoor area on the side of the building (north end), the Plan of Operation says this will be in the back. Staff would like to confirm that no outdoor area is proposed for behind the tenant space (on the west side of the building), as this area is directly adjacent to residences. Staff would also like to better understand what the outdoor area will be comprised of (i.e., what is the fencing style and will real or synthetic sod be installed, if at all?). Staff recommends a 6’, solid-wood fence, painted to complement the existing building, be installed so that it blends in with the shopping center and surrounding area. Additionally, staff would like clarification on how the interior of the space will be used and how the dog run is accessed from the building. Conditional Use Findings: Conditional Use requests are subject to the standards set forth in Section 12-3- 4(E) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. In reviewing these standards, staff has the following comments regarding the proposed Conditional Use under Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow a Domestic Pet Service in the C-3 General Commercial District: K. The proposed Conditional Use is in fact a Conditional Use established within the specific Zoning district involved: Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 8 Comment: A Domestic Pet Service is a Conditional Use in the C-3 General Commercial District, as specified in Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. L. The proposed Conditional Use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan: Comment: The 2007 Comprehensive Plan recommends a Community Commercial use for the site. M. The proposed Conditional Use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity: Comment: The proposed dog daycare would occupy an existing tenant space in an existing shopping center. No additions or exterior changes to the structure are proposed. The petitioner is proposing to add a fenced-in outdoor dog run near the north end of the building. N. The proposed Conditional Use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboring uses: Comment: The petitioner has stated that the exterior dog run will be monitored and limited in its time of operation. A staff member will always be outside with the dogs, and dogs will only be outside during reasonable hours so that neighbors are not disturbed. If/when overnight boarding is offered, the latest dogs would be outside is 10:00pm. No more than 8-10 dogs would be outside at any given time. There may be times when for medical or emergency reasons, a dog may need to go out past these hours, though these situations would be rare. The petitioner has stated that respect of their neighbors is a priority. O. The proposed Conditional Use is to be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or, agencies responsible for establishing the Conditional Use shall provide adequately any such services: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed dog daycare would be served adequately by essential public facilities and would not overburden existing public services. P. The proposed Conditional Use does not create excessive additional requirements at public expense for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic well- being of the entire community: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed dog daycare would appear to have adequate public facilities; it would not create a burden on public facilities nor would it be a detriment to the economic well-being of the community. The petitioner has stated that the building is constructed of cinderblock and insulated so that neighbors will not hear dogs barking inside. Q. The proposed Conditional Use does not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glare or odors: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed dog daycare is not anticipated to create significant traffic or noise that could be detrimental to surrounding land uses. The petitioner has stated that the building is sound-proofed and that all dogs will be monitored when outside. Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 9 R. The proposed Conditional Use provides vehicular access to the property designed so that it does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares: Comment: Based on the plans submitted, the proposed dog daycare will not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The dog daycare will be located in an existing tenant space in an existing shopping center with plenty of parking. S. The proposed Conditional Use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of natural, scenic, or historic features of major importance: Comment: The proposed dog daycare would utilize an existing structure. The proposed plan would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic or historic features of major importance. T. The proposed Conditional Use complies with all additional regulations in the Zoning Ordinance specific to the Conditional Use requested: Comment: The proposed Conditional Use complies with all additional regulations in the Zoning Ordinance. No variations are required. Recommendation: I recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a Domestic Pet Service based on a review of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 12-3-4(E) (Standards for Conditional Uses) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following condition: 1. A solid-wood fence of 6’, painted to match the exterior of the building, be installed surrounding the dog run area. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Sections 12-3-4(D) (Procedure for Review and Decision for Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned Conditional Use Permit for a Domestic Pet Service in the C-3 General Commercial District. The City Council has final authority on the proposal. Chairman Szabo asked if anyone in the audience opposes this proposal. Four people raised their hands. The following came forward and were sworn in by Chairman Szabo: • Alicia Skutnik 630 Nelson Lane (building is 15-20 yards away) Ms. Skutnik noted: o the alley that was referenced is where my paid parking spaces are o detrimental to health and wellness (there are 30 houses on the block) o would have that view (of dog run) out of our back windows if in the rear of the building • Jim Tanillo 633 Nelson Lane Mr. Tanillo advised: o he loves animals (and has 2 cats) but is against this as they pay for parking spaces. There is a car wash near the gangway. o noise is a concern o there are 2 dogs only in our section o he is 50 ft. away from this o there is another business like this but it is 1 ½ blocks away o he doesn’t want dogs to bark all night or get loose Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 10 • Dominic Lamacchia 816 Brookshire Lane (owns building to the north, west of service station) Mr. Lamacchia stated: o he rents to people and is concerned about dogs; has cameras o asked where the dog run will be in the rear. Chairman Szabo illustrated same. o there is 1 dog across the alley (west), and I hear the dog o he is looking for the best for the neighborhood; dogs bark – what if my tenants don’t like that? o as people park there, there is not much room o prefers that another business be placed there • Debbie Cucka 620 E. Central Road (owns A K9 Clipper) Ms. Cucka stated: o my grooming shop used to be in the same strip center and had 6-7 dogs daily with 1 dog outside at a time. Police were called nearly daily regarding barking complaints from neighbors. o noise will carry • Mike Galante 310 Busse Highway (owns the building; author of letter) Chairman Szabo read Mr. Galante’s letter. Mr. Galante stated: o the content of his letter is true. He never knew of police being called; he is shocked. He is committed to addressing any problems as soon as possible. o there have been vacancies o he tried to be a good neighbor though he is not sure neighbors have been as amenable o he has had to remove graffiti o there are always cars against the fence; may place a sign which could promote towing o he has struggled to find a business/tenant o should tenants violate the lease, they could be evicted Ms. Cucka stated she talked with Mr. Galante on several occasions about police calls. • Debbie Otrosa 620 Central (worked here previously) Ms. Otrosa stated: o she knows the dogs will make noise o building was neglected by owner; does not take care of tenants Ms. Schilling stated an assessment was conducted; will do whatever is necessary to work with the neighbors. The initial proposal was a dog run in the rear, but we considered the neighbors and relocated it to the front of the building. The dogs bark as they play; there’s not continuous barking. All play will occur indoors, with no play in the outdoor area. They want to be good neighbors. Board Member Fowler asked how many staff there would be. Ms. Schilling advised – 2, starting with 7-10 dogs. Due to this climate, dogs would be inside often, not outside for a prolonged period. Ms. Janczak stated they wish to be kind to the neighbors. She referenced the other shop in Mt. Prospect. Case #17-102-CU 1345 E Golf Road Conditional Use Permit Case #17-104-CU 676 N. Golf Road Conditional Use Permit December 12, 2017 Page 11 Board Member Catalano asked if dogs would be placed outside 3-4 times daily, for how long, and for how long a period each time. Ms. Janczak advised – for 5 minutes to use the bathroom. Ms. Schilling advised the play area is inside. Board Member Hofherr asked, regarding the noise issue, if there are complaints, could additional soundproofing be added, perhaps as a Condition of approval? Ms. Schilling stated – yes, and noted the evaluator stated that is an option also. Board Member Saletnik asked/stated: • what the noise performance standard is regarding neighbors. Senior Planner Bye advised she does not know what the decibel maximum is however police would be called and could perform a sound reading. • An acoustical engineer can detect gaps and seal same. Ms. Schilling concurs. A motion was made by Board Member Saletnik, seconded by Board Member Hofherr, to recommend approval to City Council as presented. Senior Planner Bye inquired about the fence. Board Member Saletnik is amenable with Conditions suggested by Staff. AYES: Bader, Fowler, Hofherr, Saletnik, Szabo NAYES: Catalano, Schell ***MOTION CARRIED 5-2*** Chairman Szabo advised a recommendation for approval would be submitted to City Council. Senior Planner Bye introduced Patrick Ainsworth as the new Economic Development Coordinator (replacing Lauren Pruss). Mr. Ainsworth introduced himself and advised he was previously with the Village of Hanover Park. OLD BUSINESS There was no Old Business. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Board Member Hofherr, seconded by Board Member Catalano, to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 p.m. On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. Sincerely, Gale Cerabona, Recording Secretary cc: City Officials, Aldermen, Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioners