The URL can be used to link to this page

2023-12-18 Council Packet City Council Agenda Monday, December 18, 2023 Regular Session – 7:00 p.m. Room 102 CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION ROLL CALL PRAYER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT (matters not on the agenda) ALDERMEN ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS MAYORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS CITY CLERK ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENTS MANAGER’S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY/GENERAL COUNSEL REPORT Monday, December 18, 2023 City of Des Plaines City Council Agenda Page | 2 CONSENT AGENDA 1. FIRST READING – ORDINANCE M-25-23: Approving the Vacation of Public Streets Near 170-190 South Des Plaines River Road and 1460 and 1484 Rand Road 2. FIRST READING -- ORDINANCE M-26-23: Approving the Purchase of a Bobcat Compact Track Loader through Sourcewell Contract #040319-CEC from Atlas Bobcat, Elk Grove Village, Illinois in the Amount of $86,525.42 and Trade-In of Our 2009 Bobcat T300. Budgeted Funds – Water/Sewer Equipment Replacement. 3. RESOLUTION R-234-23: Approving Task Order No. 1 with John Neri Construction Company, Inc. in the Amount of $250,000.00. Budgeted Funds – Water. 4. RESOLUTION R-235-23: Approving the Howard Water Tower Altitude Valve Purchase in the Amount of $31,105.00 from Dorner Company, Sussex, Wisconsin. Budgeted Funds – Water/Sewer. 5. RESOLUTION R-236-23: Approving Statement of Supplemental Compensation to Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. For Additional Construction Engineering Services for the Oakton Street Sidepath Project in the Amount of $38,959 6. RESOLUTION R-237-23: Approving the First Renewal Term of the Parkway Restoration and Planting with Installation Services Contract with T&T Landscape Construction, Inc., Elgin, Illinois per unit pricing in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $100,000. Budgeted Funds – Water/R&M Water Distribution and General Fund/Street Maintenance/Miscellaneous Contractual Services. 7. RESOLUTION R-238-23: Approving the 2024 Purchase of Replacement Parkway Trees from Participating STC Nurseries and Planting Labor through the West Central Municipal Conference – Suburban Tree Consortium, River Grove, Illinois in the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $361,250. Budgeted Funds – General/Street Maintenance/Tree Plantings. 8. RESOLUTION R-241-23: Approving the Purchase of a Sewer Equipment of America Sewer Jetting Easement Machine through Sourcewell Contract #101221-SCA from Brown Equipment Company, Evansville, Indiana in the Amount of $94,985.59. Budgeted Funds – Equipment Replacement. 9. RESOLUTION R-244-23: Approving a Professional Service Agreement with The Lakota Group in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $38,240 for the Creation of an Action Plan for the Oakton Street Corridor 10. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE M-22-23: Approving the Vacation of a Public Alley Near 1864 Illinois Street 11. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE M-24-23: Approving a Utility Franchise Agreement with Northern Illinois Gas Company, d/b/a Nicor Gas Company, for a 50-Year Term 12. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE Z-33-23: Approving a Zoning Map Amendment and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD) at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street with Recommended Conditions from 12/4/23 City Council Meeting Monday, December 18, 2023 City of Des Plaines City Council Agenda Page | 3 13. SECOND READING – ORDINANCE Z-34-23: Approving a Zoning Map Amendment from C-3 to R-4 at Approximately 919 and 921 Graceland Avenue (Former Contour Saws Parking Lot) 14. Minutes/Regular Meeting – December 4, 2023 UNFINISHED BUSINESS n/a NEW BUSINESS 1. FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION – Alderman Dick Sayad, Chair a. Warrant Register in the Amount of $8,733,157.59 – RESOLUTION R-243-23 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – Alderman Colt Moylan, Chair a. Consideration of a Cook County Property Tax Class 6b Incentive Renewal for 2150 Oxford Road, Des Plaines, Illinois – RESOLUTION R-242-23 OTHER MAYOR/ALDERMEN COMMENTS FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER ADJOURNMENT ORDINANCES ON THE AGENDA FOR FIRST READING APPROVAL MAY ALSO, AT THE COUNCIL’S DISCRETION, BE ADOPTED FOR FINAL PASSAGE AT THE SAME MEETING. City of Des Plaines, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in the meeting(s) or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting(s) or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 391-5486 to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for these persons. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Jonathan Stytz, AICP, Senior Planner Ryan Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Cc: Tim Oakley, Director of Public Works and Engineering John LaBerg, Civil Engineer Subject: Approve Vacation of Public Streets Near 170-190 S. Des Plaines River Road and 1460 and 1484 Rand Road (1st Ward) Issue: Chris Pesche, the authorized agent for the property owner Pesche’s Property South, LLC, has requested that the City vacate portions of public streets Sakas Drive and Woodland Avenue (rights-of-way) so that they have the ability to fully utilize the land as part of their commercial property. Pesche’s Property South, LLC currently owns all parcels abutting the public rights-of-way that are the subject of the vacation request. Analysis: The six properties abutting the subject rights-of-way encompass approximately 230,733 square feet (5.30 acres) and include several commercial buildings and surface parking areas. The existing public rights- of-way totaling 17,222 square feet in area do not contain any utility lines. An appraisal was performed by Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corporation and is attached. The appraisal assigns a market value of $65,000. City Council Action: Per City Code (Section 8-1-9: Vacation of Public Streets and Alleys), the City Council has the authority to approve vacations for compensation that is “…fair market value of the property acquired or … the benefits which will accrue to them by reason of that vacation.” The Council may approve attached Ordinance M-25-23 to approve the Plat of Vacation and to vacate the alley for $65,000. Ordinance passage requires a 3/4 affirmative vote of the Council. Attachments Attachment 1: Aerial/Location Map Attachment 2: Site Photos Attachment 3: Plat of Survey Attachment 4: Appraisal Report Ordinance M-25-23 Exhibit A: Plat of Vacation MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 48 CONSENT AGENDA #1. Sakas Drive Vacation to Pesche's Flowers 0 150 300 ft Print Date: 10/13/2023 Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground. NotesAttachment 1Page 2 of 48 Attachment 2Page 3 of 48 Streets Near 170 DP River Rd – Sakas Dr Entrance Facing NE Streets Near 170 DP River Rd – Woodland Ave Entrance Facing West Streets Near 170 DP River Rd – Sakas Dr Terminus Facing SW V Streets Near 170 DP River Rd – Woodland Ave Terminus Facing East AllAttachment 3Page 4 of 48 APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY SAKAS DRIVE NEXT TO 170 S. Des Plaines River Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP Senior Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE APPRAISAL: October 16, 2023 DATE OF REPORT: November 17, 2023 TYPE OF REPORT: Appraisal Report PREPARED BY: Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS CHICAGO METRO REALTY VALUATION CORP. NICHOLAS F. SOLANO, MAI, FRICS 1363 Shermer Road, Suite 334 Northbrook, IL 60062 630-544-1342 Attachment 4 Page 5 of 48 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com SAKAS DRIVE NEXT TO 170 S. DES PLAINES RIVER ROAD DES PLAINES, IL 60016 Attachment 4 Page 6 of 48 CHICAGO METRO REALTY VALUATION CORP. Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com November 17, 2023 Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP Senior Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 SUBJECT RE: Sakas Drive adjacent to 170 S. Des Plaines River Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 Dear Mr. Stytz: As requested, an inspection and appraisal have been prepared on the referenced subject property for the purpose of developing my opinion of the market value for the fee simple estate for your disposition decisions. Investigations and analysis were completed to conform to the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The accompanying appraisal report contains summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that are used in the appraisal process, whereas additional documentation is retained in the file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and the intended use of the appraisal. The subject property of this appraisal consists of 17,222 SF of land area dedicated as a public street that is currently improved with access and parking serving the Pesche’s Flowers greenhouse property located at 170 S. River Road. The subject property is non- buildable as a standalone property due to limited size and zoning restrictions. Being non- buildable separately as a standalone site, the subject property has a limited use and market that affects value. The property was appraised using sales of non-buildable parcels of land. Based on the analyses and conclusions in the accompanying report, and subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions expressed in this report, my opinion of value for the subject property is as follows. Attachment 4 Page 7 of 48 Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP City of Des Plaines November 17, 2023 Page 2 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com Premise Estate Effective Date Value Market Value Fee Simple October 16, 2023 $65,000 MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the attached report. The above value conclusion is also based on the following hypothetical conditions and/or extraordinary assumptions 1 that may affect the value. 1) None. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Regards, Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS IL Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #553.000268, exp. 09/30/2025 1 Extraordinary Assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Hypothetical Condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. (Source: USPAP) Attachment 4 Page 8 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 3 Identification of the Subject Property ................................................................................... 3 Legal Description of the Subject Property ............................................................................. 3 Ownership and Sales History of the Subject Property........................................................... 3 Client, Intended Use and Intended User ............................................................................... 3 Property Rights Appraised ..................................................................................................... 3 Definition of Fee Simple Estate .............................................................................................. 4 Ownership Interest Appraised ............................................................................................... 4 Type and Definition of Value ................................................................................................. 4 Scope of Work for the Appraisal ............................................................................................ 5 Real Estate & Real Property ................................................................................................... 5 Intangible Assets .................................................................................................................... 6 Personal Property .................................................................................................................. 6 Type of Report ....................................................................................................................... 6 Disclosure of Competency ..................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION AND MARKET INFORMATION ....................................................... 12 Regional Map ......................................................................................................................... 7 National Economic Indicators ................................................................................................ 8 Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 9 Market Area Description ........................................................................................................ 9 Location Satellite Views ....................................................................................................... 12 Retail Submarket Overview ................................................................................................. 13 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 20 Size and Aerial View of Subject Property ............................................................................. 15 FEMA Flood Hazard Map ..................................................................................................... 16 Description of Subject Property ........................................................................................... 16 Zoning Map .......................................................................................................................... 19 Zoning Information .............................................................................................................. 19 Highest and Best Use Analyses ............................................................................................ 21 VALUATION METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 22 Sales Comparison Approach To Value (Method One) ......................................................... 23 Analysis and Adjustment of Sales Data ................................................................................ 27 Value Indications by Sales Comparison Approach (Method One) ....................................... 28 Discount to Buildable Land (Method Two) .......................................................................... 29 Reconciliation of Market Value............................................................................................ 30 Exposure Time ...................................................................................................................... 30 Certification.......................................................................................................................... 31 General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions .................................................................... 32 Attachment 4 Page 9 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ADDENDA .................................................................................................... 35 Photographs ......................................................................................................................... 36 Appraiser Qualifications Attachment 4 Page 10 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. INTRODUCTION IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is Sakas Drive adjacent to 170 S. Des Plaines River Road, Des Plaines, IL 60016 in Cook County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The legal description of the subject property was not furnished. OWNERSHIP AND SALES HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY According to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice promulgated by the Appraisal Institute, it is necessary to report and analyze any prior sales, asking prices, contracts or other activity concerning the subject property being appraised for at least the past three years. The subject property is owned by the City of Des Plaines. Reportedly, the owner of the adjacent property located at 170 S. River Road, Des Plaines, IL 60016 is interested in purchasing the subject property for assemblage with the existing commercial property occupied by Pesche’s Flowers. No information was furnished or uncovered by the appraiser regarding asking prices, offers, options, sales or pending sale contracts for the subject property in the past three years. CLIENT, INTENDED USE AND INTENDED USER The Client is the City of Des Plaines, who contacted and engaged the appraiser. The Intended User of the appraisal is the City of Des Plaines. The Intended Use of the appraisal is for disposition decisions by the City of Des Plaines. Other parties that may receive a copy of the appraisal or review the report do not become intended user(s) or Client of the appraisal. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The subject property is not leased. The property rights appraised includes the fee simple estate. Covenants, restrictions, and easements of record or proposed known to the appraiser and described in this report are reflected in the valuation of the subject property. Attachment 4 Page 11 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE Fee simple estate is defined as an “Absolute ownership interest unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.” (Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, 2022). Covenants, restrictions, easement reported or uncovered by the appraiser and described in this report are reflected in the and in the valuation of the subject property. OWNERSHIP INTEREST APPRAISED The 100% ownership interest is appraised for the subject property. TYPE AND DEFINITION OF VALUE The client requested my opinion of market value of the subject property. Market value is a type of value, stated as an opinion, that presumes the transfer of a property (i.e., a right of ownership or a bundle of such rights), as of a certain date, under specific conditions set forth in the applicable definition of the term. The most applicable definition of value selected by the appraiser is the definition of market value used by agencies that regulate federally insured financial institutions in the United States. This definition of market value is: “The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1.Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2.Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; 3.A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4.Payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5.The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.” (Source: 12 C.F.R. Part 34.42(g); 55 Federal Register 34696, August 24, 1990, as amended at 57 Federal Register 12202, April 9, 1992; 59 Federal Register 29499, June 7, 1994). Attachment 4 Page 12 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE APPRAISAL The type and extent of research and analyses performed for the appraisal, and the conditions of the appraisal are summarized as follows. 1. The appraiser made a physical inspection of the subject property and exterior viewing of the adjacent properties. An appraiser’s inspection is typically limited to those things readily observable without the use of special testing or equipment. An inspection by an appraiser is not the equivalent of an inspection by an inspection professional (e.g., a structural engineer or home inspector). 2.The appraiser gathered available and pertinent information concerning the subject property from the Client, subject property owner, the property inspection and available public records and databases. 3.The appraiser collected information concerning the market to identify factors and trends relevant to the valuation; 4.The appraiser investigated the sales history, ownership and taxes of the property; 5.The appraiser performed a market analysis and determined highest and best use as vacant and as improved; 6.The appraiser sourced market data from multiple listing services, assessor's office, and/or reputable market data publications; 7.The appraiser collected, confirmed and analyzed market information for use in the sales comparison approach to value. The cost or income approaches are not applicable for properties of the subject type. 8. The appraiser developed an opinion of market value using the sales comparison methods to value within the guidelines set forth in the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The exposure time was estimated for the subject property based on surveyed data. 9.The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the report, and any extraordinary assumptions or hypothetical conditions described in the letter of transmittal of this report that may affect the value conclusion 10.The scope of work is further defined and inclusive of the content and form of this report. REAL ESTATE & REAL PROPERTY Real estate is identified parcel or tract of land, including improvements, if any. (USPAP, 2020-2021 ed) and real property includes the interests, benefits, and rights inherent in the ownership of real estate. (USPAP, 2020-2021 ed.) The appraisal of the subject property includes the land, building, site improvements, and property rights associated with the fee simple estate subject to any leases, covenants, restrictions and easements described in this report. Attachment 4 Page 13 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible property or intangible assets are nonphysical assets, including but not limited to franchises, trademarks, patents, copyrights, goodwill, equities, securities, and contracts as distinguished from physical assets such as facilities and equipment (USPAP Definitions 2020-2021 ed.). The valuation does not include intangible assets. PERSONAL PROPERTY Personal Property is “any tangible or intangible article that is subject to ownership and not classified as real property, including identifiable tangible objects that are considered by the general public as being “personal,” such as furnishings, artwork, antiques, gems and jewelry, collectibles, machinery and equipment; and intangible property that is created and stored electronically such as plans for installation art, choreography, emails, or designs for digital tokens” (USPAP Definitions 2020-2021 ed.). The appraisal does not include value for personal property. TYPE OF REPORT The report has been prepared under the Appraisal Report option of Standards Rule 2-2) of USPAP. As such, it contains summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that are used in the appraisal process whereas supporting documentation is retained in my file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and the intended use of the appraisal. DISCLOSURE OF COMPETENCY Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS is aware of the competency provision of USPAP and meet their standards. The appraiser has prior experience in similar properties the Chicago Metropolitan area, including the subject area, and is competent to complete the assignment. Refer to the appraiser’s qualifications in the Addenda. Attachment 4 Page 14 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. REGIONAL MAP Attachment 4 Page 15 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS Source: Appraisal Institute Attachment 4 Page 16 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. LOCATION MAP Attachment 4 Page 17 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. MARKET AREA DESCRIPTION Location The subject property is located in City of Des Plaines, a northwest suburb located 28 miles northwest of Chicago's central business district. Nearby suburban communities include Mt. Prospect, Park Ridge and Elk Grove Village. Transportation and Access The subject property has good access to major streets and expressways. A commuter train station is in Des Plaines .75 mile south of subject property. Access to I-294 Tollway is on Dempster Street one mile southeast or on Golf Road one mile northeast. The downtown district of Des Plaines is .75 mile south of the subject property. Demographic Profile The market area is comprised of middle-income households. The population is forecast to remain fairly stable in the market areas over the next five years. Population 1 Mile 2 Mile 3 Mile 2010 Population 12,824 59,238 134,143 2023 Population 14,572 60,430 134,879 2028 Population Projection 14,923 60,713 135,144 Annual Growth 2010-2023 1.0% 0.2% 0% Annual Growth 2023-2028 0.5% 0.1% 0% Median Age 45 42.7 42.7 Bachelor's Degree or Higher 41% 38% 39% Households 2023 Households 7,190 24,211 51,584 2028 Household Projection 7,358 24,337 51,685 Avg Household Income $84,288 $94,286 $102,503 Median Household Income $65,629 $71,383 $77,669 2023 Avg HH Vehicles: 2 2 2 Housing Median Home Value: $245,604 $264,941 $302,618 Median Year Built: 1984 1969 1967 Source: CoStar, Inc. Traffic Count The average annual daily traffic count along Rand Road at the location of the subject property was 20,116 in 2014 and the AADT traffic count on Des Plaines River Road was 19,803 in 2021. Attachment 4 Page 18 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Daytime Employment The economic base of the surrounding suburban areas is comprised of retail, industrial, offices and the Ascension Holy Family Hospital. According to CoStar Data, located within three-mile radius of the subject property are 7,144 businesses employing 65,767 persons. Services The City of Des Plaines provides an array of community services, public parks, and community centers, and recreation centers. Housing Prices The chart below, developed from the MRED MLS database, illustrates the trend in the median sale price for single-family homes in the City of Des Plaines and in the entire Chicago market area. Uses The subject property is located in a commercial area at the intersection of Rand Road (US Route 12) and Des Plaines River Road. Uses in the area include a gas station, auto repair facilities, retail stores, vehicle sales, garage buildings, restaurants, industrial uses, River Rand Bowling, a funeral home, and a large garden center occupied by Pesche’s Flowers. Attachment 4 Page 19 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. The area is nearly fully developed. Buildings typically range from 20 to over 60 years old. Some properties in the area are inside the 100-year AE flood hazard. LOCATION SATELLITE VIEWS Attachment 4 Page 20 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. RETAIL SUBMARKET OVERVIEW The retail market is comprised of storefronts, shopping centers, auto repair facilities, dealerships, banks, day care centers, restaurants and other retail uses. The two-mile market, as tabulated by CoStar Inc., has an inventory of 2.885 million square feet of retail space in 258 buildings. The average vacancy is 11.8% compared to 10.50% in 2019 and the average asking rent is $9.49/SF compared to $10.42/SF in 2019. The two-mile market area has 53 retail spaces available for lease posted in the Costar database. The retail space distribution is presented in the map below. A market summary of supply and demand is presented on the following page. RETAIL SUBMARKET (TWO-MILE RADIUS) Attachment 4 Page 21 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. RETAIL SUBMARKET (TWO-MILE RADIUS) Source: CoStar Inc. Attachment 4 Page 22 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. SIZE AND AERIAL VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Source: GIS Consortium furnished by Client Attachment 4 Page 23 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAP Attachment 4 Page 24 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Use and occupancy: Part of the parking lot and access for Pesche’s Flowers garden center. Land Area: 17,222 SF Measurements: See site plan on page 15 Source of Land Area: Scaled from GIS Consortium obtained from Client Frontage and Access: The subject property has frontage on Rand Road (US Route 12)and Des Plaines River Road (US Route 45). The subject property has a one driveway for access to Rand Road. Utilities: All public and municipal utilities (including water, sewer, electric, natural gas, cable, internet, and telephone) are available to the subject property. Topography: The site is generally level near at the grades of Rand Road and Des Plaines River Road. Contour maps from Cook Viewer indicate the topography ranges from 632 feet near Rand Road to 637 feet near Des Plaines River Road. Flood Community Panel #: 17031C0217J, effective 08/19/2008 Flood Zone: Approximately 40%2 of the land area of the subject property is estimated to be in Zone AE with base flood elevation of 634’ and 60% is in a Zone X, area of minimal flooding Flood Insurance: Typically required for buildings in Zone AE. Adjacent Uses: Commercial property occupied by Pesche’s Flowers adjacent to subject property on all sides and zoned C-3 by City of Des Plaines. Wetland Areas: None observed Environmental Hazards: Environmental evaluation is beyond my scope of expertise. A qualified engineer should be consulted on this matter. The scope of work does not include an investigation of any adverse environmental conditions. Ground Stability: The appraiser was not furnished a soil analysis. The appraisal assumes that the soil’s load bearing capacity is sufficient to support structures based on surrounding development. Covenants, Restrictions and Easements: No easements or restrictions exist, or are proposed to be reserved upon sale of the subject property. 2 Scaled from FEMA maps using on-line measurement tool. Attachment 4 Page 25 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Improvements: The subject property is improved with paving and parking areas. Real Estate Taxes: The subject property is not assessed for taxes. The 2022 tax rate for this district is 8.801%. Commercial properties have an assessment level of 25% of value, and the 2022 equalization factor is 2.9237. Adjacent Property: The subject property is adjacent to 170 S. Des Plaines River Road, which is improved with a garden center occupied by Pesche’s Flowers. Below is a summary of Pesche’s properties adjacent to the subject property. Parcel ID Address Owners Building SF Land SF Total Assessment Last Sale Date Last Sale Type Last Sale Price 09-17-200-029-0000 1442 Rand Rd PESCHE PROP SOUTH LLC 566 9,322 $132,324 12/27/2006 Arms Length $400,000 09-17-200-081-0000 1400 Rand Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 6,008 34,630 $613,736 2/26/1996 Arms Length $405,000 09-17-200-102-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 62,917 184,259 $3,698,468 6/2/1999 Arms Length $235,000 09-17-201-005-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 6,578 $93,036 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-201-007-0000 170 S River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 29,621 $41,524 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-201-008-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 29,621 $41,460 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-201-006-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 29,621 $41,624 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-201-009-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 29,621 $41,400 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-201-036-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES S LLC 6,316 $88,772 3/30/2016 Arms Length $130,000 09-17-200-087-0000 1460 Rand Rd PESCHE PROPERTIES SOUTH LLC 1,512 15,682 $231,848 12/1/2017 Arms Length $240,000 09-17-200-082-0000 1424 Rand Rd PESCHES INC 9,409 $132,164 09-17-200-083-0000 1424 Rand Rd PESCHES INC 30,928 $43,688 09-17-200-086-0000 1446 Rand Rd PESCHES INC 16,117 $22,752 2/22/2007 Arms Length $190,000 09-17-201-035-0000 170 S Des Plaines River Rd PESCHES PROPERTY SOUTH 42,340 $608,424 7/11/2018 Arms Length $920,000 Source: CoStart Public Records Database PESCHE'S PROPERTIES Attachment 4 Page 26 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ZONING MAP Source: Excerpt of City of Des Plaines Zoning Map Attachment 4 Page 27 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ZONING INFORMATION Jurisdiction: City of Des Plaines Designation: C-3, General Commercial District Permitted Uses: The purpose of the C-3 general commercial district is to accommodate a variety of businesses in locations to serve the community of Des Plaines. A wide array of commercial and retail uses are permitted in the C-3 district. Auto body repair, auto service repair are conditional uses in the C-3 district. Minimum Yards: Front Yard: 5 feet Side Yard: Not applicable for subject property Corner Yard: Not applicable for subject property Rear Yard: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less. Minimum Lot Width: None Minimum Lot Size: None Maximum Floor Area Ratio: None Maximum Building Coverage: None Maximum Height: 45 feet Parking Requirements: Retail establishments require one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. Nurseries, building material yards, equipment rental, and similar uses require 1 space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. Flood Control: The City of Des Plaines participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that is overseen by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Development in and/or filling of the flood plain requires proper elevation above the 100-year flood level, compensatory storage and other provisions. Sites with relatively high elevations compared to the flood hazard base elevation are more accommodating to mitigation measures. Conformance: The above regulations only outline some of the development standards of the C-3 district. The use of the subject property for parking and access for Pesche’s Flowers appears to be conforming to the zoning. Attachment 4 Page 28 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSES The development of an opinion of market value first requires a determination of highest and best use, founded on the forces of supply and demand. The highest and best use of the property must be determined for both the subject property as though vacant, and for the property as currently improved (if applicable). The highest and best use must meet the following criteria: 1.Legally permissible under the zoning laws and other restrictions that apply to the property, with consideration of reasonable probability of zoning. 2.Physically possible given the property size and characteristics. 3.Financially feasible, or those uses that are legally and physically possible and also produce a positive return on investment. 4.The particular use (or class of uses) that pass the first three criteria and also produce the highest net return on investment relative to risk are the maximally productive and highest and best use of the property, which then becomes the basis of the market value estimate. Highest and Best Use Conclusion Due to size restrictions, the subject property is non-buildable independently or wide enough to accommodate a parking lot without the benefit of easements from adjacent properties. The subject property has 40% of its land area in the 100-year flood hazard that is only slightly below the elevation if the site. As a site not able to be developed independently, the highest and best use of the subject property is determined to be for assemblage adjacent properties by Pesche’s Flowers as a retail garden center for parking and access. Attachment 4 Page 29 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. VALUATION METHODOLOGY There are basically three methods in estimating the market value of non-buildable parcels of the subject type described below. Sales Comparison Approach (Method One): This method is the conventional sales comparison approach to value. This method derives an opinion of value based on sales of comparable properties. The market value for the subject property is characterized by prices paid for non-buildable sites in which there was also a limited market. The appraiser discovered several sales of non-buildable parcels of land that are considered in the valuation of the subject property. Discount to Buildable Land (Method Two): This method provides an estimate of value by applying a market-derived discount to the going rate of buildable land in the location of the subject property. This method first establishes the value of a buildable lot in the location of the subject location, and then a market derived discount is applied to reflect the fact that the value of non-buildable land is less marketable and has less market value than a buildable lot. The discounted unit price would then be applied to the subject parcel resulting in its market value. Before and After Assemblage (Method Three): Before and After valuations of the adjacent property or properties and subject property as assembled are developed using sales comparison in order to indicate the increment in value associated with assemblage. This value method relies on sales of two properties similar in all respects except for lot size. The difference in sale price would reflect how much the extra land contributed to price due to enhancement of more yard or land to accommodate a building addition. An analysis of several paired sales would indicate the value enhancement after assemblage. The appraiser attempted this method of analysis; however, due to the diversity of property styles and sacristy of recent comparable sales within the subject market area, the integrity of any matched pair analysis is compromised and therefore not meaningful enough to provide a credible indication of value. A matched paired analysis in this case would require too many qualitative adjustments to the comparable sales in order to make them similar enough to extract any value attributed to more land area. Furthermore, this analysis would not necessarily reflect the effects of a restrictive market on the value. Therefore, this method of analysis was not used in this appraisal. Reconciliation Methods One and Two are used in the appraisal of the subject property. The results of each method are reconciled to a final indication of market value. Method One, which is the conventional sales comparison approach, is presented first followed by Method Two analysis. Limited market discounts of non-buildable properties are estimated in the sales comparison approach, which is applied in the Method Two analysis. Attachment 4 Page 30 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE (METHOD ONE) The sales comparison approach to value is a process of comparing prices paid for similar properties that have sold, listed or pending. Comparisons are made of the terms and dates of the sales, their locations and physical characteristics. Dissimilarities of the properties being compared to the subject are evaluated and the sums added or subtracted from their prices. Some unit of comparison, such as price per square foot, price per room, or gross income multiplier (GIM) is used. The steps taken to apply the sales comparison approach, as outlined in the Appraisal of Real Estate 15th Edition, are as follows: 1.Research the competitive market for information on properties that have sold, are listed for sale or are under contract. In selecting the data, consideration is made for such characteristics as property type, date of sale, size, location and use. The selected sales should attract a buyer who would also consider purchasing the subject property; 2.Verify the information about the sales so market comparison to the subject property is credible; 3.Select the most relevant unit of comparison that best explains market behavior and variance in sales prices; 4.Consider the various elements of comparison and adjust the sale prices of the selected data to equate them to the subject property; 5.If applicable, reconcile the various indicators of value provided by the adjusted prices into a single value indication for the subject property. The comparison analysis is made based on total sale price and price per square foot of land area. The following sale data are presented as the best indicators of value for the subject property for assemblage purposes or speculative purchaser and not for independent commercial use. Data sources include CoStar, LoopNet, MRED MLS, buyers, sellers, brokers, appraiser files, and available public records. Attachment 4 Page 31 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DETAILS OF DATA USED IN VALUATION OF WHOLE PROPERTY Data No. Property Type Location Sale Date Document No. Sale Price Approx. Land SF Flood or Wetland Zoning Utilities $/ SF 1 Vacant Land Adjacent to South of 944 Washington St., Naperville, IL 03/2014 R2014-022477 $20,000 9,936 SF No flood hazard or wetland B-3, Naperville All Available $2.01 This is an interior site with 40.98 feet of frontage on the east side of Washington Street and depth of 250.26 feet. The site is zoned B-3 in Naperville. The site is located behind a retail center anchored by Jewel Osco and next to a Dairy Queen Restaurant. It was once used as an outside sales lot for an Amling’s store. The site has limited development potential and use due to restricted size and street frontage although the site is considered buildable under the B-3 zoning of Naperville, which has no minimum lot size, width or side yard requirements. The property was purchased by an investor. The asking price was originally $100,000 in July 2013, reduced to $30,000 before selling for $20,000 in March 2014. The site was put back on the market for sale in January 2016 for $39,999, reduced to $34,999 in August 2016 and the listing was cancelled on March 13, 2017. The property has no flood hazard or wetland. This sale was verified with the listing broker. 2 Vacant Land SWC Lake Street and I-355 Addison, IL 10/2014 R2014-102483 $39,500 38,538 SF No flood hazard or wetland B-3, Addison All Available $1.02 This is a narrow triangular site with limited frontage for access on Lake Street. The site sides to an entrance ramp to I-355. The site is covered with heavy brush. It is adjacent to a self-storage warehouse facility. The attorney representing the seller and who prepared the deed indicated the site was considered non-buildable. It was left over from a business park development by Hamilton Partners for potential use as a billboard, but the zoning in Addison does not allow billboard use. The site was purchased by a private party as an investment and speculated that it may be suitable for a billboard or cell tower, and that access could likely be obtained from Lake Street. The site was exposed to the market by a broker before selling at auction at the minimum bid of $39,500. The property has no flood hazard or wetland. The sale was verified with the seller’s attorney and the buyer, Mr. Dave Heidner. 3A 3B Parking Lot N/S Washington St., east of IL Rt. 31, West Dundee, IL 08/2015 2015K048551 08/2016 2016K044597 $20,000 $28,000 9,250 SF No flood hazard or wetland B-3, West Dundee All Available $2.16 $3.03 This is a 60’ x 150’ non-buildable site improved with a 20-space, asphalt-paved parking lot. The lot was being used for access and parking by the adjacent Chipotle and Starbucks restaurants located at 203 N. Route 31 in West Dundee, IL. The site was not encumbered with a parking or access easement or a lease. The site does not meet the minimum lot size of 15,000 SF or minimum width of 100 feet required by the B-3 zoning. The site was non-buildable according to the planning department of West Dundee. The site was sold through the MRED MLS after 23 days on the market. It was purchased by an investor. After the sale, the new owner attempted to enclose the site with fencing to block Starbucks and Chipotle but the Village did not allow the fence construction. Data 3B is the resale of Data 3A. The site was put back on the market in the MRED MLS for $49,800 in June 2016. It was advertised as having been appraised for $100,000. The listing flyer indicated the new owner would have to deal with Starbucks and Chipotle using it for parking and access. The property ended up selling to Zetech Corporation, who is the title holder of the adjacent property occupied by Starbucks and Chipotle. This sale was verified with the purchaser, Mr. Ty Zweifel of Zetech Corporation. Refer to additional sales on next page. Attachment 4 Page 32 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DETAILS OF DATA USED IN VALUATION OF WHOLE PROPERTY Data No. Property Type Location Sale Date Document No. Sale Price Approx. Land SF Flood or Wetland Zoning Utilities $/ SF 4 Vacant Land Adjacent to west of 1801 IL Rt. 59, P.O. Plainfield, IL 12/2012 R2013023157 $8,500 7,742 SF No flood hazard or wetland B-3, Joliet All Available $1.10 This is 7,742 SF of land that is part of non-buildable stormwater management and shared parking area (known as Outlot 8) serving an existing business park development that was granted to the adjacent property owner for the development of a NASCAR tunnel carwash. A 60.01’ x 129.02’ non-buildable section of Outlot 8, that was level and graded, was granted as an exclusive permanent easement for a price of $8,500 to benefit the adjacent commercial site. The adjacent site having the benefit of the permanent easement then sold in January 2013 for $608,500 or $14.55/SF of useable land area per R2013031179. After the sale, the entire site was developed with a NASCAR carwash in 2013 and the easement area was used for the main driveway entrance, vacuum stations, and staging area for the new car wash. 5 A & B Parking Lot and access (Vacation) Adjacent to 430 Dundee Rd., and 755 Skokie Blvd, Northbrook, IL 08/2019 192213411 Ordinance 04/2019 1910634079 $100,000 $50,000 21,000 SF No flood hazard or wetland 12,000 SF C-3, Northbrook C-3, Northbrook All Available All Available $4.76 $4.16 21,000 SF of land with a parking lot, representing a portion of Henrici Drive in Northbrook, located next to PINS 04-02-424- 030 and -32 had easements and was too narrow to be buildable. The property was purchased for assemblage with 430 Dundee Road and 755 Skokie Blvd for renovation of an existing building into a new 11,000 SF retail use. Northbrook reserved easements for access and utilities. These adjacent two properties, totaling approximately 1.81 acres of land and an 11,000 SF older commercial building, were exposed to the market and sold for a total combined price of $4,250,000 in 2019. To complete the assemblage, a 0.275-acre landlocked section of parking lot was purchased in 2019 by quit claim deed from Cook County for a price of $50,000 (PIN 04-02-424-033), equating to $4.16/SF. Subject Property Sakas Drive Adjacent to 170 S. Des Plaines River Road Des Plaines , IL 10/2023 Value 17,222 SF 40% flood hazard C-3, Des Plaines All Available Value This is a narrow site frontage on Rand Road and Des Plaines River Road, not wide enough to accommodate independent development or parking. The property is currently used by adjacent property owner Pesche’s Flowers for access to Rand Road and parking. Attachment 4 Page 33 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF SALES DATA Data 1 Data 2 Data 3A & 3B Data 4 Data 5 Subject Property Attachment 4 Page 34 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ANALYSIS AND ADJUSTMENT OF SALES DATA No two properties are equal and their prices vary due to differences in transactional factors (e.g., property rights, sale conditions and market conditions) and property factors (e.g., location and physical characteristics). Adjustments are made to the price of each comparable property for differences; the adjustment process is intended to make the comparable equal to the subject property as of the date of value. Adjustments are explained below. Real Property Rights Conveyed Property rights refer to the interest being conveyed such as fee simple estate, leased fee estate, leasehold interest, or partial interest and also considers covenants, restrictions and easements. Data 4 and 5 have restricted property rights, warranting upward adjustment compared to the property rights being appraised for the subject property. Seller Financing Terms An adjustment for financing is applied to a property that transfers with atypical financing such as a seller installment contract carrying a favorable interest rate or terms that inflated the purchase price. Conversely, interest rates on seller financing at above-market levels can result in lower sale prices. Such atypical financing can cause the sale price to not be representative of market value, and in such cases require an adjustment. No adjustments are required for financing terms. Conditions of Sale This adjustment relates to the particular motivation of the buyer or seller in which the sale price is not reflective of an arms-length transaction or particular motivations of the buyer or seller in which the price is not reflective of market value. None of the sales is an REO or short sales. All of the sales are non-buildable parcels purchased by an adjacent owner for assemblage or a speculative buyer. All of the data reflect significant discounts reflecting their limited marketability and use. No adjustments are warranted for unusual sale conditions of the sale. Market Conditions (Date of sale) The real estate market is not static. Prices for real estate normally change over time due to fluctuations in supply and demand. Changes in market conditions can be caused by periods of economic recession or expansion, availability of financing, change in tax laws, building cycles, and investor’s perceptions of current and future market conditions. Adjustments are made to the comparable when prices have appreciated or depreciated between the effective date of the appraisal and the sale date of a comparable. Adjustments are made for market conditions (dates of sale) compared to market conditions as of the effective date of value for the subject property. Attachment 4 Page 35 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Location Adjustments are made when the location of a comparable that are different from those of the subject property in terms of supply and demand, price levels, access to public transportation and expressways, traffic exposure, linkage to amenities and other location characteristics that affect value. Adjustments are made for differences in location of the data compared to the location of the subject property. Physical Characteristics & Other Adjustments Adjustments are considered for major physical differences between the subject property and the comparables in terms of 100-year flood hazard, potential use, frontage, land size, useable site improvements and any extraordinary costs of assemblage and/or use. VALUE INDICATIONS BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH (METHOD ONE) Based on analysis and adjustment to the sales, and considering the location, characteristics of the subject property and current market conditions, my opinion of value is $60,000 by the sales comparison approach, equating to $3.50/SF of land area. Attachment 4 Page 36 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DISCOUNT TO BUILDABLE LAND (METHOD TWO) The sales cited in the previous section have prices ranging from $$8,500 to $100,000 computing to $1.02 to $4.76 per square foot of land area. The data are non-buildable parcels by themselves and therefore have limited pool of potential buyers. The sale prices are estimated to have been discounted from 80% to 93% compared to prices for buildable commercial sites in their respective markets and locations, summarized in the table below. Data #Location Sq. Ft.Price Discount $/SF 1 Naperville 9,936 20,000$ 90% 2.01$ 2 Addison 38,538 39,500$ 93% 1.02$ 3B West Dundee 9,250 28,000$ 80% 3.03$ 4 Plainfield 7,742 8,500$ 93% 1.10$ 5A Northbrook 21,000 100,000$ 86% 4.76$ 5B Northbrook 12,000 50,000$ 88% 4.17$ ESTIMATED DISCOUNTS FOR NON BUILDABLE SITES Summarized in the table below are prices for buildable commercial properties comparable to the subject property in location. The prices range from $15.48 to $32.59 per square foot of land area. Sale 5 has a shallow flood hazard that was able to be mitigated. Sale #Address Village Sale Date Sale Price Demo needed Lot Size (SF)Flood Hazard Intended Use $/SF 1 51 McHenry Rd.Buffalo Grove Aug-23 $1,218,000 none 37,374 None Restaurant $32.59 2 1440 Higgins Rd..Park Ridge Mar-23 $3,000,000 none 95,396 None Hotel $31.45 3 225 E. Palatine Rd. Arlington Hts.Oct-21 $1,400,000 none 53,810 None Restaurant $26.02 4 700 Lake Cook Rd.Buffalo Grove Aug-20 $5,649,900 Office Blg.332,854 None Gas Station $16.97 5 1055 Milwuakee Ave.Riverwoods Jun-22 $1,445,000 None 73,924 76% flood Gas Station $19.55 6 1387 Prospect Ave.Des Plaines Apr-23 $119,000 None 7,688 None Retail $15.48 PRICES FOR BUILDABLE COMMERCIAL SITES The price range is due to differences in market conditions, location, size, demolition needed, flood hazard, depth of the flood hazard, and other factors. Adjustments are made for differences compared to the subject property. Also considered is the site improvements (paving) on the subject property and access to Rand Road, which contribute to value. Based on the cited data, and considering the location and features of the subject property, my opinion of value as if buildable independently is $20/SF for the subject property. Based on price discounts estimated from non-buildable commercial sites previously presented, the limited-market discount applicable to the subject property and market area is estimated to be 80% indicating a market value of $70,000 for the subject property by this methodology (17,222 SF x $20/SF x 20%). Attachment 4 Page 37 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. RECONCILIATION OF MARKET VALUE The indicated value by the two methodologies ranges from $60,000 to $70,000. Both are considered valid based on the availability of data. Based upon my investigation, analyses and experience, my opinion of market value for the subject property is as follows. Premise Estate Effective Date Value Market Value Fee Simple October 16, 2023 $65,000 MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the attached report. The value conclusion is also subject to the following extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions that may affect the assignment result. 1.Refer to any statements contained in the letter of transmittal of this report. EXPOSURE TIME Appraisal standards require the appraiser to form an opinion of the exposure time applicable to the conclusion of market value for subject property. Exposure time, is defined by USPAP, is “an opinion, based on supporting market data, of the length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal”. Exposure time is presumed to take place prior to the effective date of value. My opinion of exposure time for the subject property at the concluded market value is up to 12 months. Attachment 4 Page 38 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1.The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2.The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3.I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4.I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or the parties involved with this assignment. 5.My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6.My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7.My analyses, opinions, and conclusions have been developed, and this report has been prepared, in compliance with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, and in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). 8.Nicholas F. Solano has made a personal inspection of the property. 9.Nicholas F. Solano has performed no services as an appraiser or any other services regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. 10.No one has provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. 11.This appraisal is not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. 12.The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 13.As of the date of this appraisal, Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS, has completed the requirements of the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS IL Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #553.000268, Exp. 09/30/2025 Attachment 4 Page 39 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal is based on the following general assumptions and limiting conditions, except as otherwise noted in the report. 1.The title is marketable and free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, encroachments, easements and restrictions. The property is under responsible ownership and competent management and is available for its highest and best use. 2.There are no existing judgments or pending or threatened litigation that could affect the value of the property. 3.There are no hidden or undisclosed conditions of the land or of the improvements that would render the property more or less valuable. Furthermore, there is no asbestos in the property. 4.The revenue stamps placed on any deed referenced herein to indicate the sale price of a comparable are in correct relation to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5.The property is in compliance with all applicable building, environmental, zoning, and other federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. 6.The conclusions stated in my appraisal apply only as of the effective date of the appraisal, and no representation is made as to the effect of subsequent events. 7.No changes in any federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated. 8.Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, I am not required to give testimony, respond to any subpoena or attend any court, governmental or other hearing with reference to the property without compensation relative to such additional employment. 9.I have made no survey of the property and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or survey of the property included in this report is for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered to be scaled accurately for size. The appraisal covers the property as described in this report, and the areas and dimensions set forth are assumed to be correct. 10.No opinion is expressed as to the value of subsurface oil, gas or mineral rights, if any, and I have assumed that the property is not subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials, unless otherwise noted in my appraisal. 11.I accept no responsibility for considerations requiring expertise in such fields, but are not limited to, legal descriptions and other legal matters such as legal title, geologic considerations such as soils and seismic stability, and civil, mechanical, electrical, structural and other engineering and environmental matters. 12.The distribution of the total valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. The appraisal report shall be considered only in Attachment 4 Page 40 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. its entirety. No part of the appraisal report shall be utilized separately or out of context. 13.Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute) shall be disseminated through advertising media, public relations media, news media or any other means of communication (including without limitation prospectuses, private offering memoranda and other offering material provided to prospective investors) without the prior written consent of the person signing the report. 14.Information, estimates and opinions contained in the report, obtained from third- party sources are assumed to be reliable and have not been independently verified. 15.Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only for the purpose of estimating value and do not constitute predictions of future operating results. 16.If the property is subject to one or more leases, any estimate of residual value contained in the appraisal may be particularly affected by significant changes in the condition of the economy, of the real estate industry, or of the appraised property at the time these leases expire or otherwise terminate. 17.No consideration has been given to personal property located on the premises or to the cost of moving or relocating such personal property; only the real property has been considered, unless otherwise noted in the appraisal. 18.The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. I have not made a specific survey or analysis of any property to determine whether the physical aspects of the improvements meet the ADA accessibility guidelines. In as much as compliance matches each owner’s financial ability with the cost to cure the non-conforming physical characteristics of a property, I cannot comment on compliance to ADA. Given that compliance can change with each owner’s financial ability to cure non-accessibility, the value of the subject does not consider possible non-compliance. A specific study of both the owner’s financial ability and the cost to cure any deficiencies would be needed for the Department of Justice to determine compliance. 19.No studies have been provided to the appraiser indicating the presence or absence of hazardous materials on the subject property or in the improvements, and my valuation is predicated upon the assumption that the subject property is free and clear of any environment hazards including, without limitation, hazardous wastes, toxic substances and mold. No representations or warranties are made regarding the environmental condition of the subject property and the person signing the report shall not be responsible for any such environmental conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because I am not an expert in the field of environmental conditions, the appraisal report cannot be considered as an environmental assessment of the Attachment 4 Page 41 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. subject property. The appraiser does not guarantee that the subject property is free of defects or environmental problems. 20.The person signing the report may have reviewed available flood maps and may have noted in the appraisal report whether the subject property is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. I am not qualified to detect such areas and therefore do not guarantee such determinations. The presence of flood plain areas and/or wetlands may affect the value of the property, and the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that wetlands are non-existent or minimal. 21.The appraisal report and value conclusion assumes the satisfactory completion of construction, repairs or alterations in a workmanlike manner, if applicable for proposed construction. 22.It is expressly acknowledged that in any action which may be brought against the appraiser arising out of, relating to, or in any way pertaining to this engagement, the appraisal reports, or any estimates or information contained therein, the appraiser shall not be responsible or liable for an incidental or consequential damages or losses. 23.The use of the appraisal report by anyone other than the client is prohibited except as otherwise provided. Accordingly, the appraisal report is addressed to and shall be solely for the client’s use and benefit unless I provide my prior written consent. I expressly reserve the unrestricted right to withhold my consent to your disclosure of the appraisal report (or any part thereof including, without limitation, conclusions of value and my identity), to any third parties. Stated again for clarification, unless my prior written consent is obtained, no third party may rely on the appraisal report (even if their reliance was foreseeable). 24.Any prospective value opinions presented in this report are estimates and forecasts, which are prospective in nature and are subject to considerable risk and uncertainty. In addition to the contingencies noted in the preceding paragraph, several events may occur that could substantially alter the outcome of my estimates such as, but not limited to changes in the economy, interest rates, and capitalization rates, behavior of consumers, investors and lenders, fire and other physical destruction, changes in title or conveyances of easements and deed restrictions, etc. It is assumed that conditions reasonably foreseeable at the present time are consistent or similar with the future. 25.The comments by the licensed real estate appraiser contained within this appraisal report on the condition of the property do not address "standards of practice" as defined in the Home Inspector License Act [225 ILCS 441] and 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1410 and are not to be considered a home inspection or home inspection report. Attachment 4 Page 42 of 48 SAKAS DRIVE ADJACENT TO 170 S. RIVER ROAD, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. PHOTOGRAPHS Attachment 4 Page 43 of 48 CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE M - 25 - 23 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PUBLIC ALLEY AT 170-190 S. DES PLAINES RIVER ROAD, 1460 RAND, AND 1484 RAND ROAD.__________________________ WHEREAS, Pesche’s Property South, LLC (“Owner”) is the owner of the real property commonly known as 170-190 S. Des Plaines River Road (“River Road Properties”) and 1460- 1484 Rand Road (“Rand Road Properties”), in Des Plaines, Illinois (collectively, the River Road Properties and Rand Road Properties are the “Subject Property”), which Subject Property is located in the C-3 General Commercial District of the City (“C-3 District”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is bisected by an approximately 9,465-square-foot section of the City-owned dedicated right-of-way commonly known as Woodland Avenue (“Woodland Avenue ROW”) and an approximately 7,643-square-foot section of the City-owned, dedicated right-of-way commonly known as Sakas Drive (“Sakas Drive ROW”); and WHEREAS, the River Road Properties consist of seven lots of record as follows: one lot to the north of the Woodland Avenue ROW (“Northern Parcel”), with a Property Identification Number (“PIN”) of 09-17-200-102-0000, and six lots to the south (“Southern Parcels”), with the following PIN assignments: 09-17-201-036-0000, 09-17-201-005-0000, 09-17-201-006-0000, 09- 17-201-007-0000, 09-17-201-008-0000, and 09-17-201-009-0000 and; WHEREAS, the Northern Parcel is improved with two commercial buildings and a surface parking lot and the Southern Parcels are improved with two accessory structures and a surface parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Rand Road Properties consist of four lots of record as follows: one lot to the east of the Sakas Drive ROW (“Eastern Parcel”), with a PIN of 09-17-201-035-0000, and three lots to the west (“Western Parcels”), with the following PIN assignments: 09-17-200-086- 0000, 09-17-200-087-0000, 09-17-200-029-0000, and; WHEREAS, the Owner has requested that the City vacate the Woodland Avenue ROW in order to connect the Northern Property and Southern Properties as one zoning lot and allow for the future expansion of the parking lots on the Subject Property, and; WHEREAS, the Owner has requested that the City vacate the Sakas Drive ROW in order to connect the Eastern Property and Western Properties as one zoning lot and allow for the future expansion of the parking lots on the Subject Property (collectively, the Woodland Avenue ROW and Sakas Drive ROW are the “Vacation Parcel”), which Vacation Parcel is depicted on the plat of vacation, titled “Plat of Vacation of Public right Of Way,” prepared by Gremley and Biedermann, and dated November 30, 2023 (“Plat of Vacation”) attached to, and made a part of, this Ordinance as Exhibit A; and Page 44 of 48 WHEREAS, upon the vacation of the Vacation Parcel, it will become part of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City obtained an appraisal of the Vacation Parcel that determined the value of the Vacation Parcel to be $65,000; and WHEREAS, the City has the power to vacate the Vacation Parcel pursuant to Section 8-1-9 of the City Code of the City of Des Plaines, as amended (“City Code”), and Section 11-91-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-91-1 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the public interest will be served by vacating the Vacation Parcel, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that, upon the effective date of the vacation of the Vacation Parcel, title and sole responsibility of upkeep and maintenance shall vest in the then-owner of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the vacation of the Vacation Parcel in accordance with this Ordinance will serve and be in the best interest of the City and the public; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows; SECTION 1: RECITALS. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for the approval of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: JURISDICTION. The City Council does hereby certify that the Subject Property is located entirely within the corporate limits of the City of Des Plaines and is subject to the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. SECTION 3: VACATION. Subject to the conditions set forth in this Ordinance, and pursuant to Section 8-1-9 of the City Code and Section 11-91-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-91-1 et seq., the (i) Plat of Vacation; and (ii) vacation of the Vacation Parcel as depicted on the Plat of Vacation are hereby approved. SECTION 4: OWNERSHIP AND ZONING. Upon the recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, as provided in Section 7 of this Ordinance, the vacated Vacation Parcel Page 45 of 48 is to be incorporated into and made a part of the Subject Property, and title will vest with the then- owner of the Subject Property. Following recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, the vacated Vacation Parcel will be and remain a part of the Subject Property in the C-3 District, unless and until a plat of subdivision is approved by the City in accordance with all applicable state and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. SECTION 5. COMPENSATION. The approval of the vacation as provided in Section 3 of this Ordinance is expressly made subject to and contingent upon payment by the Owner to the City of the fair market value of the Vacation Parcel in the amount of $65,000 (“Compensation”). SECTION 6: RECORDATION. The City Manager is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation to be recorded with the office of the Cook County Clerk only after receipt of the Compensation from the Owner. SECTION 7: MAINTENANCE OF THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY. After the recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, the City will have no obligation to maintain or perform improvements on the vacated Right-of-Way. SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect only upon, and not before the occurrence of the following events: A. Passage and approval by a 3/4 majority and publication in the manner provided by law; B. Receipt by the City of the Compensation from the Owner; and C. Recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation with the office of the Cook County Clerk. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 46 of 48 PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 47 of 48 Exhibit APage 48 of 48 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Tom Bueser, Superintendent of General Services Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Approve Purchase - Bobcat Track Skid-Steer T86 T4 Issue: The approved 2024 budget includes $94,000 in funding for a Bobcat Track Skid-Steer Loader. Analysis: The Sewer Division utilizes a track mounted skid steer loader regularly for material handling, cutting brush in wetlands, and other tasks as needed. Staff assessed products for this type of equipment. After review of the models, options available, and the City’s current equipment, the T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader was chosen by crew members and staff to best fit the City’s needs. The City’s current unit is a 2009 Bobcat T300 which provides our maintenance operators with an understanding of controls/operations/etc. Atlas Bobcat is the regional supplier of this unit, which is available through Sourcewell Contract #040319-CEC in the amount of $86,525.42 and includes the trade-in of the current 2009 Bobcat T300. Recommendation: We recommend the purchase of a T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader through Sourcewell Contract #040319-CEC, from Atlas Bobcat, 1160 McCabe Avenue, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007, in the amount of $86,525.42 and trade-in of our 2009 Bobcat T300. Source of funding will be the Equipment Replacement Fund account (500-00-570-0000.8015). Attachments: Ordinance M-26-23 Exhibit A - Agreement MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 12 CONSENT AGENDA #2. 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE M - 26 - 23 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING A 2009 BOBCAT T300 OWNED BY THE CITY OF DES PLAINES AS SURPLUS AND APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A BOBCAT TRACK SKID-STEER FROM ATLAS BOBCAT. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City is the owner of a 2009 Bobcat T300 with bucket ("Surplus Property"), which Surplus Property is further described on Attachment 1 attached to this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Surplus Property is no longer necessary or useful to, or for the best interest of, the City; and WHEREAS, the City has appropriated funds in the Equipment Replacement Fund for use by the Public Works and Engineering Department during the 2024 fiscal year for the purchase of a Bobcat Compact Track Loader; and WHEREAS, after a review of equipment options, City staff determined that the Bobcat Track Skid-steer T86 T4 Loader ("Equipment") satisfies the City’s specifications and will best address the City’s needs; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of Sourcewell ("Sourcewell"), a public agency that provides cooperative purchasing solutions for government and educational agencies; and WHEREAS, Sourcewell has identified Atlas Bobcat ("Vendor") as a qualified bidder and awarded Contract #040319-CEC to the Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 1-10-2 of the City Code and the City’s Purchasing Policies, the City has determined that the purchase of the Equipment is not adapted to award by competitive bidding because Vendor is the regional supplier of the Equipment; and WHEREAS, Vendor has offered to provide a purchase credit of $16,000 for the trade-in of the Surplus Property to be used toward the purchase by the City of the Equipment from Vendor ("Trade-In Credit"); and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement to purchase the Equipment from Vendor in the not-to-exceed amount of $102,525.42 less the Trade-In Credit, for a total not to exceed amount of $86,525.42 ("Agreement"); and Page 2 of 12 2 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to dispose of the Surplus Property in accordance with this Ordinance and enter into the Agreement with Vendor for the purchase the Equipment in accordance with the Sourcewell Contract in the not-to-exceed amount of $86,525.42; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Ordinance as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION TO DISPOSE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY. Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-76-4, and the City’s home rule authority, the City Council declares that ownership of the Surplus Property, as described in Attachment 1 attached to this Ordinance, is no longer necessary or useful to, or in the best interests of, the City. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to dispose of the Surplus Property by conveying the Surplus Property to Vendor for the Trade-In Credit toward the purchase of the Equipment. SECTION 3: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT. The Agreement with Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment is approved in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form to be approved by the City Council. SECTION 4: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. The City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final Agreement. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 3 of 12 3 PASSED this ___ day of _________________, 2023. APPROVED this ___ day of ____________________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY CLERK Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form: ____ day of ____________, 2023. ________________________________ CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Trade-In and Purchase of Bobcat Loader from Atlas Bobcat thru Sourcewell Page 4 of 12 4 ATTACHMENT 1 SURPLUS PROPERTY 2009 Bobcat T300 Loader with Bucket, VIN AG5GU2210 Page 5 of 12 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES CONTRACT FOR PRICING AND DELIVERY OF T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader through Sourcewell Contract Contract: 040319-CEC Full Name of Vendor __Atlas Bobcat, Elk Grove Village, IL_______________________________________ Principal Office Address _1160 McCabe Ave., Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007_________________________ Local Office Address _______________________________________________________________________ Contact Person __Todd Swartz_______________ Telephone Number _847-529-1191_________ TO: City of Des Plaines 1111 Joseph Schwab Rd. Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 Attention: Tom Bueser/Ralph Magak Vendor warrants and represents that Vendor has reviewed and understood all documents included, referred to, or mentioned in this set of documents. 1. Contract to Deliver Products A. Contract and Products. The Vendor shall, deliver to the City, at the Delivery Address, the products, items, materials, merchandise, supplies, or other items identified in this Contract (the “Products”) in new, undamaged, and first-quality condition. Vendor further shall: 1. Labor, Equipment, Materials, and Supplies. Provide, perform, and complete, in the manner specified and described in this Contract, all necessary work, labor, services, transportation, equipment, materials, supplies, information, data, and other means and items necessary to deliver the Products to the City in a proper and workmanlike manner; 2. Permits. Procure and furnish all permits, licenses, and other governmental approvals and authorizations necessary for the Products; 3. Bonds and Insurance. Procure and furnish all bonds and all insurance certificates and policies of insurance, if any, specified in this Contract; 4. Taxes. Pay all applicable federal, state, and local taxes; and 5. Miscellaneous. Do all other things required of Bidder by this Contract. B. Performance Standards. The Vendor agrees that the Products will comply strictly with the Specifications attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Contract. If this Contract specifies a Product by brand name or model, that specification is intended to reflect the required performance standards and standard of excellence that the City requires for the Product. However, the Vendor may propose to deliver a Product that is a different brand or model, if the Vendor provides written documentation establishing that the brand or model it proposes to deliver possess equal quality, durability, functionality, capability, and features as the Product specified. C. Responsibility for Damage or Loss. The Vendor shall be responsible and liable for, and shall promptly and without charge to the City, repair or replace, any damage done to, and any loss or injury suffered by, the City as a result of the Vendor’s failure to perform hereunder. D. Inspection/Testing/Rejection. The City shall have the right to inspect all or any part of the Products. If, in the City’s judgment, all or any part of the Products is defective or damaged or fails to conform strictly to the requirements of this Contract, then the City, without limiting its other rights or remedies, may, at its discretion: (i) reject such Products; (ii) require Bidder to correct or replace such Products at Bidder’s cost; (iii) obtain new Products to replace the Products that are defective, damaged, or nonconforming and charge Bidder with any excess cost incurred thereby; and/or (iv) cancel all or any part of any order or this Contract. Products so rejected may be returned or held at Bidder’s expense and risk. 2. Pricing The Vendor shall deliver the Products to the City in accordance with the following prices: Description of Product Quantity of Product Unit Price of Product T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader- per attached Sourcewell Quote One (1) $86,525.42 Exhibit A Page 6 of 12 2 If the City has specified the Quantity of Products to be delivered to the City on Page 1 of this Contract, then the Vendor shall take, in full payment for all Products and other matters set forth under Section 1 of this Contract, including overhead and profit, taxes, royalties, license fees, delivery, contributions and premiums, and compensation to all subcontractors and suppliers, the total Contract Price of: 86,525 Dollars and 42 Cents (in figures only) If the City has not specified the Quantity of Products to be delivered to the City on Page 1 of this Contract, then the Vendor shall take, in full payment for all Products and other matters set forth under Section 1 of this Contract, including overhead and profit, taxes, royalties, license fees, delivery, contributions and premiums, and compensation to all subcontractors and suppliers, a total Contract Price that will be equal to the sum of the Unit Prices (as determined by the above Schedule of Prices) applicable to all Products accepted by the City. B. Basis for Determining Prices. It is expressly understood and agreed that: 1. All prices stated in the Pricing section are firm and shall not be subject to escalation or change; 2. The City is not subject to state or local sales, use, and excise taxes, and no such taxes are included in the Pricing section, and that all claims or rights to claim any additional compensation by reason of the payment of any such tax are hereby waived and released; 3. All other applicable federal, state, and local taxes of every kind and nature applicable to the Products are included in the Pricing; and 4. If a Quantity of Products to be delivered to the City is specified on Page 1 of this Contract, then that amount is an estimate only. The City reserves the right to increase or decrease such quantity, and the total Contract Price to be paid will be based on the final quantity determined by the City for each Product and the actual number of Products that comply with this Contract that are accepted by the City. The Vendor hereby waives and releases all claims or rights to dispute or complain of any such estimated quantity or to assert that there was any misunderstanding in regard to the number of Products to be delivered. C. Time of Payment It is expressly understood and agreed that all payments shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: Bidder will invoice Owner for all Work completed, and Owner will pay Bidder all undisputed amounts no later than 45 days after receipt by Owner of each invoice. All payments may be subject to deduction or setoff by reason of any failure of the Vendor to perform under this Contract. 3. Contract Time The Vendor shall deliver the Products to the City at the Delivery Address not later than November 1, 2024 ("Delivery Date"). Without waiving any other remedies available to the City under this Contract or at law or in equity, if the Vendor delivers the Products to the City more than 60 days after the Delivery Date, then the total Contract Price shall be reduced by one half of a percent for every seven-day period that elapses within the period of time beginning on the day after the Delivery Date and ending on the actual date that the Vendor delivers the Products to the City. Atlas Bobcat must notify the City in writing immediately of any delays emanating from Supply Chain, or Parts availability delays. It will be the City’s discretion to waive penalty or extend the Delivery Date based on information provided. 4. Financial Assurance A. Indemnification. The Vendor shall indemnify, save harmless, and defend the City against all damages, liability, claims, losses, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) that may arise, or be alleged to have arisen, out of or in connection with the Vendor’s performance, or failure to perform, under this Contract, including, without limitation, any failure to meet the representations and warranties set forth in Section 6 of this Contract. B. Penalties. The Vendor shall be solely liable for any fines or civil penalties that are imposed by any governmental or quasi-governmental agency or body that may arise, or be alleged to have arisen, out of or in connection with the Vendor’s performance, or failure to perform, under this Contract. 5. Firm Contract All prices and other terms stated in this Contract are firm and shall not be subject to withdrawal, escalation, or change provided the City accepts this Contract within 30 days after the date this sealed Contract is opened. 6. Bidder’s Representations and Warranties In order to induce the City to accept this Contract, the Vendor represents and warrants as follows: A. The Products. All Products, and all of their components, shall be of merchantable quality and, for a Exhibit A Page 7 of 12 3 period of 2 years or 2000 hours whichever occurs first manufacturer warranties after delivery to the City: (1) shall be free from any latent or patent defects or flaws in workmanship, materials, and design; (2) shall strictly conform to the requirements of this Contract, including, without limitation, the performance standards set forth in Subsection 1B of this Contract; and (3) shall be fit, sufficient, and suitable for the purposes expressed in, or reasonably inferred from, this Contract. The warranties expressed herein shall be in addition to any other warranties applicable to the Products (including any manufacturer’s warranty) expressed or implied by law, which are hereby reserved unto the City. B. Compliance with Laws. All Products, and all of their components, shall comply with, and the Vendor agrees to be bound by, all applicable federal, state, and local laws, orders, rules, and regulations, as they may be modified or amended from time to time. Every provision required by law to be inserted into this Contract shall be deemed to be inserted herein. C. Not Barred. The Vendor is not barred by law from contracting with the City or with any other unit of state or local government as a result of: (1) a delinquency in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue unless the Vendor is contesting, in accordance with the procedures established by the appropriate revenue act, its liability for the tax or the amount of tax, as set forth in 65 ILCS 5/11-42.1-1; (2) a violation of either Section 33E-3 or Section 33E-4 of Article 33 of the Criminal Code of 1961, 720 ILCS 5/33E-1 et seq.; or (3) any other reason. D. Qualified. The Vendor has the requisite experience, ability, inventory, capital, facilities, equipment, plant, organization, and staff to enable the Vendor to deliver the Products at the Contract Price and within the Contract Time set forth above. 7. Acknowledgements In submitting this Contract, the Vendor acknowledges and agrees that: A. Reliance. The City is relying on all warranties, representations, and statements made by the Vendor in this Contract. B. Binding Effect. The Vendor is bound by each and every term, condition, or provision contained in this Contract and in the City’s written notification of acceptance in the form included in this bound set of documents. C. Remedies. Each of the rights and remedies reserved to the City in this Contract are cumulative and additional to any other or further remedies provided in law or equity or in this Contract. E. Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of all terms and provisions of this Contract. Except where specifically stated otherwise, references in this Contract to days shall be construed to refer to calendar days and time. F. No Waiver. No examination, inspection, investigation, test, measurement, review, determination, decision, certificate, or approval by the City, whether before or after the City’s acceptance of this Contract; nor any information or data supplied by the City, whether before or after the City’s acceptance of this Contract; nor any order by the City for the payment of money; nor any payment for, or use, possession, or acceptance of, the whole or any part of the any Product by the City; nor any extension of time granted by the City; nor any delay by the City in exercising any right under this Contract; nor any other act or omission of the City shall constitute or be deemed to be an acceptance of any defective, damaged, or nonconforming Product, nor operate to waive or otherwise diminish the effect of any representation or warranty made by the Vendor; or of any requirement or provision of this Contract; or of any remedy, power, or right of the City. G. Severability. It is hereby expressed to be the intent of the parties to this Contract that should any provision, covenant, agreement, or portion of this Contract or its application to any Person or property be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Contract and the validity, enforceability, and application to any Person or property shall not be impaired thereby, but the remaining provisions shall be interpreted, applied, and enforced so as to achieve, as near as may be, the purpose and intent of this Contract to the greatest extent permitted by applicable law. H. Amendments and Modifications. No amendment or modification to this Contract shall be effective until it is reduced to writing and approved and executed by the corporate authorities of the parties in accordance with all applicable statutory procedures. I. Assignment. Neither this Contract, nor any interest herein, shall be assigned or subcontracted, in whole or in part, by the Vendor except upon the prior written consent of the City. J. Governing Law. This Contract shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws, but not the conflicts of laws rules, of the State of Illinois. DATED this 18th day of December 2023. Exhibit A Page 8 of 12 4 Vendor’s Status: ( ) _____________ Corporation ( ) _______________ Partnership ()Individual Proprietor (State) (State) Vendor’s Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Doing Business As (if different): _________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Vendor or Authorized Agent: ________________________________________________________________ (corporate seal) Printed Name: ______________________________________________ (if corporation) Title/Position: ______________________________________________ Vendor’s Business Address: __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Vendor’s Business Telephone: ________________________________ Facsimile: ________________________________ If a Corporation or Partnership, list all Officers or Partners: NAME TITLE ADDRESS Exhibit A Page 9 of 12 5 ACCEPTANCE The Contract attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof is hereby accepted by the order of the City of Des Plaines (the “City”) this _____ day of _______________ 20____. This Acceptance, together with the Contract attached hereto, constitutes the entire and only agreement between the parties relating to the Products and the compensation therefor and supersedes and merges any other prior or contemporaneous discussions, agreements, or understandings, whether written or oral, and shall prevail over any contradictory or inconsistent terms or conditions contained in any purchase order, acceptance, acknowledgement, invoice, or other standard form used by the parties in the performance of the Contract. Any such contradictory or inconsistent terms or conditions shall be deemed objected to by the City without further notice of objection and shall be of no effect nor in any circumstances binding upon the City unless accepted by the City in a written document plainly labeled “Amendment to Agreement.” Acceptance or rejection by the City of any such contradictory or inconsistent terms or conditions shall not constitute acceptance of any other contradictory or inconsistent terms or conditions. CITY OF DES PLAINES By: ______________________________________ Title: ____City Manager_____________________ #11783739_v1 Exhibit A Page 10 of 12 Product Quotation Quotation Number: TS189736 Quote Sent Date: Nov 13, 2023 Expiration Date: Dec 13, 2023 Prepared By Todd Swartz Phone: 847-529-1191 Email: tswartz@atlasbobcat.com __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Customer City of Desplaines 1111 JOSEPH J SCHWAB RD DES PLAINES, IL, 60016-6735 Phone: +1 847 391 5470 Contact Ralph Magak Email: rmagak@desplaines.org Dealer Atlas Bobcat, Elk Grove Village, IL 1160 MCCABE AVE ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL, 60007 Item Name Item Number Quantity Price Each Total T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader M0385 1 89,042.16 89,042.16 Standard Equipment: 105.0 HP Tier 4 V2 Bobcat Engine Auxiliary Hydraulics: Variable Flow Two-Speed Travel Rear Camera Backup Alarm Bob-Tach Mounting System Bobcat Interlock Control System (BICS ) Controls: Selectable Joystick Controls Cylinder Cushioning - Lift, Tilt Engine/Hydraulic Performance De-rate Protection Glow Plugs (Automatically Activated) Horn Instrumentation: Keyless Start with 5" Display Panel, Engine Temperature, Fuel Gauges, Hourmeter, RPM, Warning Indicators and other vitals Lift Arm Support Lift Path: Vertical Lights, Front & Rear LED Operator Cab: Enclosed Cab with Heat and AC Includes: Adjustable Vinyl Suspension Seat, Top & Rear Windows, Parking Brake, Seat Bar & Seat Belt, Sound Reduction, Radio Ready, SAE-J1040 & ISO 3471 Falling Object Protective Structure (FOPS) meets SAE-J1043 & ISO 3449, Level I; (Level II is available through Bobcat Parts) Parking Brake: Spring Applied, Pressure Released (SAPR) Solid Mounted Carriage with 5 Rollers Tracks: Rubber, 17.7" Wide Telematics - Machine IQ Warranty: 2 years, or 2000 hours whichever occurs first Deluxe Package Included: Deluxe Package:, Clear Side Auto HVAC Cab, Integrated Bluetooth Radio, Adjustable Heated Cloth Air Ride Seat, Power Bob-Tach, Solid Undercarriage, 7" Touch Display, Premium and Side Lights, Keyless Start, Two-Speed Travel, 7-Pin Attachment Control, Dual Direction Bucket Positioning, Rear Camera, Sound Reduction, 3yr Machine IQ Health & Security Subscription M0385-P11-C12 1 4,368.24 4,368.24 High Flow Hydraulics M0385-R03-C09 1 2,684.16 2,684.16 80" Severe Duty Bucket 7326129 1 2,082.32 2,082.32 Bolt-On Cutting Edge, 80" 6718008 1 406.88 406.88 Strobe Light Kit, Amber 7375339 1 441.66 441.66 60/2000 Full 9986213 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 Total for T86 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader 102,525.42 Quote Total - USD 102,525.42 Exhibit A Page 11 of 12 Discount 2009 Bobcat T300 w/bucket -16,000.00 Sales total before Taxes 86,525.42 Taxes 0.00 Quote Total - USD 86,525.42 Notes: Quote based on current Sourcewell Discount per Contract: 040319-CEC Customer Acceptance: Quotation Number: TS189736 Purchase Order:___________________________________ Authorized Signature: Print:_______________________________ Sign:_____________________________________________________________ Date:_____________ Email:________________________________________________________ Tax Exempt: Y ▢ / N ▢ Exhibit A Page 12 of 12 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847-391-5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Robert Greenfield, Superintendent of Utility Services Cc: Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Task Order #1 – Lead Water Service Replacements Issue: The budget includes funds to replace lead service lines as required by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). Analysis: The IEPA has mandated that all water systems are required to develop a full water service line inventory by April of 2024. In addition, they require that water systems develop a water service line replacement plan and comply with increased lead testing. John Neri Construction Company, In., has a positive existing relationship with the City and has performed these types of services in the past without any issues. Recommendation: We recommend approval of Task Order #1 with John Neri Construction Company, Inc., 770 Factory Road, Addison, Illinois, 60101, in the amount of $250,000.00. Source of funding will be the Water Fund. Attachments: Resolution R-234-23 Exhibit A – Task Order #1 MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 13 CONSENT AGENDA #3. 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 234 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER NO. 1 WITH JOHN NERI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR ADDITIONAL WATER SERVICE REPAIR SERVICES.____ WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution R-203-23, which authorized the City to enter into a master contract ("Master Contract") with John Neri Construction Company, Inc. ("Contractor") to perform certain construction and underground utility services for the City as such services are needed over time; and WHEREAS, since the beginning of the year, the City has experienced a large number of water main breaks that required immediate attention and Contractor assisted with the repairs on a force account basis pursuant to Illinois Department of Transportation standards; and WHEREAS, the City has identified several locations that need additional repairs, which repairs will improve the reliability of the City’s water system, including installing fire hydrants, replacing valves, transferring water services, and repairing future broken water mains within the City ("Additional Repair Services"); and WHEREAS, given the City’s positive existing relationship with the Contractor, and the Contractor’s knowledge of the City’s water system, Public Works and Engineering staff requested that Contractor provide a proposal to perform the Additional Repair Services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into Task Order No. 1 under the Master Contract with Contractor for the procurement of the Additional Repair Services in the not-to-exceed amount of $250,000 ("Task Order No. 1"); and WHEREAS, the City has sufficient funds in the Water Fund for the procurement of the Additional Services from Contractor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to waive the competitive bidding requirements in the City Code and enter into and Task Order No. 1 with Contractor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. Page 2 of 13 2 SECTION 2: WAIVER OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING. The requirement that competitive bids be solicited for the procurement of the Additional Repair Services is hereby waived. SECTION 3: APPROVAL OF TASK ORDER NO. 1. The City Council hereby approves Task Order No. 1 in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form to be approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 4: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE TASK ORDER NO. 1. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, final Task Order No. 1. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this ____ day of __________________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of ______________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Task Order No. 1 with John Neri Construction Page 3 of 13 -1- ATTACHMENT A TASK ORDER In accordance with Section 1.2 of the Master Contract dated November 6, 2023 between the City of Des Plaines (the “City”) and JOHN NERI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. (“Contractor”), the Parties agree to the following Task Number 1: [Check applicable boxes and insert required information.] 1.Project: Lead Water Service Replacements. 2.Work Site: Various locations throughout the City. 3.Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Authorizations: Contractor must obtain all required governmental permits, licenses, approvals, and authorizations, except: [Identify permits, licenses, and approvals obtained, or to be obtained, by Owner] _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ No Exceptions 4.Commencement Date: the date of execution of the Contract by Owner. ______________ days after execution of the Contract by Owner. Exhibit A Page 4 of 13 ATTACHMENT A November 6, 2023 5.Completion Date: ______________ days after the Commencement Date plus extensions, if any, authorized by a Change Order issued pursuant to Subsection 2.2A of the Contract April 1, 2024, plus extensions, if any, authorized by a Change Order issued pursuant to Subsection 2.2A of the Contract 6.Insurance Coverage: A.Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability with limits not less than: (1)Worker’s Compensation: Statutory; (2)Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 injury-per occurrence; $1,000,000 disease-per employee; $1,000,000 disease-policy limit Such insurance must evidence that coverage applies in the State of Illinois. B.Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Liability with a combined single limit of liability for bodily injury and property damage of not less than $2,000,000 for vehicles owned, non-owned, or rented. All employees must be included as insureds. C.Comprehensive General Liability with coverage written on an “occurrence” basis and with limits no less than: (1)General Aggregate: $5,000,000. See Subsection F below regarding use of umbrella overage. (2)Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 per person; $2,000,000 per occurrence (3)Property Damage: $2,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 aggregate. Coverage must include: -Premises / Operations X X Exhibit A Page 5 of 13 ATTACHMENT A -Products / Completed Operations (to be maintained for two years after Final Payment) - Independent Contractors - Personal Injury (with Employment Exclusion deleted) - Broad Form Property Damage Endorsement -Blanket Contractual Liability (must expressly cover the indemnity provisions of the Contract) - Bodily Injury and Property Damage “X”, “C”, and “U” exclusions must be deleted. Railroad exclusions must be deleted if Work Site is within 50 feet of any railroad track. All employees must be included as insured. D.Builders Risk Insurance. This insurance must be written in completed value form, must protect Contractor and Owner against “all risks” of direct physical loss to buildings, structures, equipment, and materials to be used in providing, performing, and completing the Work, including without limitation fire extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief, sprinkler leakage, flood, earth movement and collapse, and must be designed for the circumstances that may affect the Work. This insurance must be written with limits not less than the insurable value of the Work at completion. The insurable value must include the aggregate value of Owner-furnished equipment and materials to be constructed or installed by Contractor. This insurance must include coverage while equipment or materials are in warehouses, during installation, during testing, and after the Work is completed, but prior to Final Payment. This insurance must include coverage while Owner is occupying all or any part of the Work prior to Final Payment without the need for the insurance company’s consent. E.Owner’s and Contractor’s Protective Liability Insurance. Contractor, at its sole cost and expense, must purchase this Insurance in the name of Owner with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of not less than $1,000,000. F.Umbrella Policy. The required coverage may be in the form of an umbrella policy above $2,000,000 primary coverage. All umbrella policies must provide Exhibit A Page 6 of 13 ATTACHMENT A excess coverage over underlying insurance on a following-form basis so that, when any loss covered by the primary policy exceeds the limits under the primary policy, the excess or umbrella policy becomes effective to cover that loss.  G.Deductible. Each policy must have a deductible or self-insured retention of not more than $________. H.Owner as Additional Insured. Owner must be named as an Additional Insured on the following policies: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ The Additional Insured endorsement must identify Owner as follows: The City of Des Plaines and its boards, commissions, committees, authorities, employees, agencies, officers, voluntary associations, and other units operating under the jurisdiction and within the appointment of its budget. I.Other Parties as Additional Insureds. In addition to Owner, the following parties must be named as additional insured on the following policies: Additional Insured Policy or Policies ________________________ __________________________ ________________________ __________________________ ________________________ __________________________ 7.Contract Price: SCHEDULE OF PRICES A.LUMP SUM CONTRACT For providing, performing, and completing all Work, the total Contract Price of (write in numbers only): $ ________________________________ Exhibit A Page 7 of 13 ATTACHMENT A All Work will be paid on a force account basis, using the terms of Section 109.04(b) of the IDOT Standard Specifications For Road And Bridge Construction 2012, without limitation to “extra work.” Contractor shall be paid in installments (see below). Contractor must submit Pay Requests including itemized statements of the cost of the Work, accompanied and supported by statements and invoices for all labor, materials, transportation charges and other items of the Work, using standard Illinois Department of Transportation schedules and report forms. For providing, performing, and completing all Work, the total Contract Price of (write in numbers only): $250,000.00________________________________ B.UNIT PRICE CONTRACT NOTE: If Owner has provided a separate form Schedule of Pricing attached to this Attachment A, then that Schedule of Prices will be used and this Subsection B should not be used. If Owner has not provided a separate form Schedule of Prices, then this Subsection B should be used. For providing, performing, and completing all Work, the sum of the products resulting from multiplying the number of acceptable units of Unit Price Items listed below incorporated in the Work by the Unit Price set forth below for such Unit Price Item: COMPLETE TABLE AS INDICATED Unit Price Item Unit Approximate Number of Units Price Per Unit Extension 1 $_________ $_______________ 2 $_________ $_______________ 3 $_________ $_______________ TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE (write in numbers only): $ _____________________________________ X Exhibit A Page 8 of 13 ATTACHMENT A C.COMBINED LUMP SUM/UNIT PRICE CONTRACT (1)For providing, performing, and completing all Work related to [describe lump sum work], the total sum of (write in numbers only): (2)For providing, performing, and completing all Work related to [describe unit price work], the sum of the products resulting from multiplying the number of acceptable units of Unit Price Items listed below incorporated in the Work by the Unit Price set forth below for such Unit Price Item: $ ______________________________________ COMPLETE TABLE AS INDICATED Unit Price Item Unit Approximate Number of Units Price Per Unit Extension 1 $_________ $_______________ 2 $_________ $_______________ 3 $_________ $_______________ TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE, being the sum of (1) plus the extension of (2) (write in numbers only): $ ________________________________________ D.Any items of Work not specifically listed or referred to in the Schedule of Prices, or not specifically included for payment under any Unit Price Item, shall be deemed incidental to the Contract Price, shall not be measured for payment, and shall not be paid for separately except as incidental to the Contract Price, including without limitation extraordinary equipment repair, the cost of transportation, packing, cartage, and containers, the cost of preparing schedules and submittals, the cost or rental of small tools or buildings, the cost of utilities and sanitary conveniences, and any portion of the time of Bidder, its superintendents, or its office and engineering staff. 8.Progress Payments: A.General. Owner must pay to Contractor 90 percent of the Value of Work, determined in the manner set forth below, installed and complete in place up to Exhibit A Page 9 of 13 ATTACHMENT A the day before the Pay Request, less the aggregate of all previous Progress Payments. The total amount of Progress Payments made prior to Final Acceptance by Owner may not exceed 90 percent of the Contract Price. B.Value of Work. The Value of the Work will be determined as follows: (1)Lump Sum Items. For all Work to be paid on a lump sum basis, Contractor must, not later than 10 days after execution of the Contract and before submitting its first Pay Request, submit to Owner a schedule showing the value of each component part of such Work in form and with substantiating data acceptable to Owner (“Breakdown Schedule”). The sum of the items listed in the Breakdown Schedule must equal the amount or amounts set forth in the Schedule of Prices for Lump Sum Work. An unbalanced Breakdown Schedule providing for overpayment of Contractor on component parts of the Work to be performed first will not be accepted. The Breakdown Schedule must be revised and resubmitted until acceptable to Owner. No payment may be made for any lump sum item until Contractor has submitted, and Owner has approved, an acceptable Breakdown Schedule. Owner may require that the approved Breakdown Schedule be revised based on developments occurring during the provision and performance of the Work. If Contractor fails to submit a revised Breakdown Schedule that is acceptable to Owner, Owner will have the right either to suspend Progress and Final Payments for Lump Sum Work or to make such Payments based on Owner’s determination of the value of the Work completed. (2)Unit Price Items. For all Work to be paid on a unit price basis, the value of such Work will be determined by Owner on the basis of the actual number of acceptable units of Unit Price Items installed and complete in place, multiplied by the applicable Unit Price set forth in the Schedule of Prices. The actual number of acceptable units installed and complete in place will be measured on the basis described in Attachment B to the Contract or, in the absence of such description, on the basis determined by Owner. The number of units of Unit Price Items stated in the Schedule of Prices are Owner’s estimate only and may not be used in establishing the Progress or Final Payments due Contractor. The Contract Price will be adjusted to reflect the actual number of acceptable units of Unit Price Items installed and complete in place upon Final Acceptance. C.Application of Payments. All Progress and Final Payments made by Owner to Contractor will be applied to the payment or reimbursement of the costs with respect to which they were paid and will not be applied to or used for any pre- Exhibit A Page 10 of 13 ATTACHMENT A existing or unrelated debt between Contractor and Owner or between Contractor and any third party. 9.Per Diem Administrative Charge:  $ ______________________________  No Charge 10.Standard Specifications: The Contract includes the following Illinois Department of Transportation standard specifications, each of which are incorporated into the Contract by reference:  "State of Illinois Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction" (SSRB)  "Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois" (SSWS)  "Illinois Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways" (MUTCD). The Contract also includes Owner’s City Code and Building Codes. References to any of these manuals, codes, and specifications means the latest editions effective on the date of the bid opening. See Attachment D for any special project requirements. X X X X Exhibit A Page 11 of 13 ATTACHMENT A CITY CONTRACTOR _______________________________ __________________________________ Signature Signature Director of Public Works __________________________________ And Engineering Name (printed or typed) ____________________, 20____ ____________________, 20____ Date Date If compensation increase greater than $2,500, then the City Manager’s signature is required. _______________________________ Signature City Manager ____________________, 20____ Date If compensation greater than $25,000, then the City Council must approve the Services Change Order in advance and the City Manager or Mayor’s signature is required. _______________________________ Signature City Manager ____________________, 20____ Date Exhibit A Page 12 of 13 Exhibit A Page 13 of 13 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Rob Greenfield, Superintendent of Utilities Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Howard Avenue Water Tower Altitude Valve Purchase Issue: The existing altitude valve at the Howard Avenue Water Tower is not operating properly and needs replacement. Analysis: The altitude valve at the water tower was installed in 1978 and has reached the end of its useful life. This valve controls the level of the water in the tower and prevents the tower from overfilling. Dorner Company, the regional sales distributor, has provided us with a quote of $31,105.00 for the valve. Recommendation: We recommend, in the best interest of the City, that the City Council approve the Howard Avenue Water Tower Altitude Valve purchase in the amount of $31,105.00 from Dorner Company, N61 W23043 Silver Spring Drive, PO Box 189, Sussex, Wisconsin, 53089-0189. This expenditure will be paid with budgeted Water/Sewer Funds. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Dorner Company Proposal Resolution R-235-23 MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 4 CONSENT AGENDA #4. Date: 11/28/2023 To:Proposal No:Q2370clde-1 Attn:Page: one of one Ref:Industry Code: 9999 FOB: Factory Make Order To: Dorner Company Terms: N30 N61 W23043 Silver Spring Dr. Delivery: 4-5 Weeks Sussex, WI 53089 Phone No: (262) 932-2100 ext. 117 Fax No: (262) 932-2101 Sales Contact: Jim Ozimek Prepared By:Nathan Genrich Item Description Unit Price Total 1 12" Cla-Val Model 210-93 Altitude Valve, Includes: 150# Flanged Globe Pattern, Ductile Iron Body, SS Trim, 70-120ft Range, X105L2W Open and Close Limit Switches, Braided SS Tubing and Fittings Model #: 210-93BSYKCKX $ 31,105 $ 31,105 Total 31,105$ Notes: Prices quoted are FOB Factory with freight pre-pay + add. Quote valid for 30 days. Delivery times are estimated and are not guaranteed. City of Des Plaines Robert Greenfield 12" Cla-Val Model 210-93 Quan. 1 Page 1 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 4 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 235 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AN ALTITUDE VALVE FROM DORNER COMPANY. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the altitude valve at the Howard Avenue Water Tower is not operating properly and needs to be replaced; and WHEREAS, the City has sufficient funds in the Water/Sewer Fund to purchase a replacement altitude value ("Equipment"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 10 of Title 1 of the City of Des Plaines City Code and the City’s purchasing policy, the City Council has determined that the procurement of the Equipment is not adapted to award by competitive bidding because the Equipment is only available from Dorner Company, the regional supplier ("Vendor"); and WHEREAS, Vendor submitted a proposal for the purchase of the Equipment in the not- to-exceed amount of $31,105; and WHEREAS, the City desires to procure the Equipment from the Vendor in the not-to- exceed amount of $31,105; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to purchase the Equipment from the Vendor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF PURCHASE. The City Council approves the purchase by the City of the Equipment from the Vendor in a total not-to-exceed amount of $31,105. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION OF PURCHASE. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute and seal documents approved by the General Counsel, and the City Manager to make payments, on behalf of the City, that are necessary to complete the purchase of the Equipment from the Vendor in a total not-to-exceed amount of $31,105. Page 3 of 4 2 SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this ____ day of __________________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of ______________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Purchase of Altitude Valve from Dorner Page 4 of 4 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5390 desplaines.org Date: November 28, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Oakton Street Sidepath Construction Engineering Supplemental Compensation Issue: Supplemental compensation for construction engineering services approved via R-13-23 for the Oakton Street Sidepath project is requested by the awarded contractor, Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Analysis: The original construction engineering contract amount was $158,625.00. A supplemental $38,959.00 is requested by the contractor to cover additional work during construction of the project. IDOT allowed the contractor to start work on April 3, 2023 which was prior to the May 1, 2023 start date in the original contract. Also, during the construction phase of the project, the contractor encountered unanticipated efforts due to coordination with the Army Corp of Engineers and MWRD regarding permit work around the Des Plaines River. Additional efforts were also needed to coordinate work around existing utilities including, exploration of and adjustment of a District 207 fiber optic cable that conflicted with sheet piles which needed to be driven for the retaining wall construction east of the bridge. Recommendation: We concur with the increased scope of work and recommend approval of supplemental compensation to Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd., 9575 West Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois 60018 for additional construction engineering services for the Oakton Street Sidepath project in the not to exceed amount of $38,959.00. Source of funding would be the Capital Projects Fund. Attachments: Attachment 1 – R-13-23 Resolution R-236-23 Exhibit A – Statement of Supplemental Compensation MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 32 CONSENT AGENDA #5. CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 13 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH IDOT AND AN ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE OAKTON STREET SIDEPATH PROJECT. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10, of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations and corporations, in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City was awarded $1,903,538 in Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (“ITEP”) grant funding for Phase I engineering, Phase II engineering, construction engineering, and construction of the Oakton Street Sidepath Project ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the Phase I and Phase II engineering for the Project is complete and the City desires to commence the construction engineering and construction phase of the Project (“Construction Phase”); and WHEREAS, in order to begin the Construction Phase for the Project and receive the ITEP funds, the Illinois Department of Transportation ("IDOT") requires that the City enter into: (i) a Joint Funding Agreement for State-Let Construction Work with IDOT setting forth the rights and responsibilities of the City and IDOT in connection with the completion of the Project ("Joint Funding Agreement"); and (ii) a Local Public Agency Engineering Services Agreement with an engineering firm ("Engineering Services Agreement") for the procurement of construction engineering services for the Project ("Engineering Services"); and WHEREAS, the estimated cost to complete the Construction Phase of the Project is $3,192,601; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Joint Funding Agreement, $1,395,930 of the cost of the Construction Phase of the Project will be paid using federal funds (“Federal Share”), $348,982.50 of the cost of the Construction Phase of the Project will be paid using state funds (“State Share”), and the remainder, estimated to be $1,447,688.50, of the cost of the Construction Phase of the Project will be paid by the City (“City Share”); and WHEREAS, the City has appropriated sufficient funds in the Capital Projects Fund for use by the Department of Public Works and Engineering during the 2023 fiscal year to pay the City Share of the cost of the Construction Phase of the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 10 of Title 1 of the City Code of the City of Des Plaines and Section 7.4(E) of the City’s purchasing policy, the City Council has determined that the procurement of the Engineering Services is not adapted to award by competitive bidding because the Engineering Services require a high degree of professional skill and judgment; and Page 2 of 32Attachment 1 WHEREAS, in accordance with the IDOT Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Manual Chapter 5 requirements for projects that include federal funds and the City’s Purchasing Policy, the City conducted a formal Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) process for the selection of an engineering consultant; and WHEREAS, the City determined that the proposal submitted by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (“Consultant”) was the top-ranked proposal; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into the Engineering Services Agreement with Consultant for the performance of the Engineering Services in the not-to-exceed amount of $158,625; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into the Engineering Services Agreement with Consultant; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT. The City Council hereby approves the Joint Funding Agreement in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form to be approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final Joint Funding Agreement. SECTION 4: APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT. The City Council hereby approves the Engineering Services Agreement in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, and in a final form to be approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 5: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE THE ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final Engineering Services Agreement. SECTION 6: AUTHORIZATION TO PAY CITY SHARE. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and the Director of Finance to pay the City Share of the Project costs in accordance with the Joint Funding Agreement and the Engineering Services Agreement. SECTION 7: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 3 of 32Attachment 1 PASSED this ___ day of __________, 2023. APPROVED this ___ day of ___________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 4 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency Engineering Services Agreement BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 1 of 11Completed09/23/22 Using Federal Funds?Yes No Agreement For Federal CE Agreement Type Original LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY Local Public Agency Des Plaines County Cook Section Number 20-00224-00-BT Job Number C-91-042-22 Project Number 0E4U312 Contact Name Jon Duddles, PE, CFM Phone Number (847) 391-6127 Email jduddles@desplaines.org SECTION PROVISIONS Local Street/Road Name Oakton Street Length 0.42 Key Route FAU 1332 Add Location Structure Number 016-2601 Remove Location Location Termini Oakton Street to River Road Project Description A bicycle side path to connect the existing Des Plaines River Trail to River Rd along the north side of Oakton St Engineering Funding Anticipated Construction Funding MFT/TBPFederal State Other OtherStateMFT/TBPFederal Local AGREEMENT FOR Phase III - Construction Engineering CONSULTANT Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. Contact Name W. Daniel Crosson Phone Number (847) 823-0500 Address 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 City Rosemont State IL Zip Code 60018 Email dcrosson@cbbel.com Local THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE between the above Local Public Agency (LPA) and Consultant (ENGINEER) and covers certain professional engineering services in connection with the improvement of the above SECTION. Project funding allotted to the LPA by the State of Illinois under the general supervision of the State Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "DEPARTMENT," will be used entirely or in part to finance ENGINEERING services as described under AGREEMENT PROVISIONS. Since the services contemplated under the AGREEMENT are professional in nature, it is understood that the ENGINEER, acting as an individual, partnership, firm or legal entity, qualifies for professional status and will be governed by professional ethics in its relationship to the LPA and the DEPARTMENT. The LPA acknowledges the professional and ethical status of the ENGINEER by entering into an AGREEMENT on the basis of its qualifications and experience and determining its compensation by mutually satisfactory negotiations. WHEREVER IN THIS AGREEMENT or attached exhibits the following terms are used, they shall be interpreted to mean: Regional Engineer Deputy Director, Office of Highways Project Implementation, Regional Engineer, Department of Transportation Resident Construction Supervisor Authorized representative of the LPA in immediate charge of the engineering details of the construction PROJECT In Responsible Charge A full time LPA employee authorized to administer inherently governmental PROJECT activities Contractor Company or Companies to which the construction contract was awarded Page 5 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 2 of 11Completed09/23/22 AGREEMENT EXHIBITS The following EXHIBITS are attached hereto and made a part of hereof this AGREEMENT: EXHIBIT A: Scope of Services EXHIBIT B: Project Schedule EXHIBIT D: Cost Estimate of Consultant Services (CECS) Worksheet (BLR 05513 or BLR 05514 ) EXHIBIT C: Qualification Based Selection (QBS) Checklist I. THE ENGINEER AGREES, 1. To perform or be responsible for the performance of the Scope of Services presented in EXHIBIT A for the LPA in connection with the proposed improvements herein before described. 2. The Classifications of the employees used in the work shall be consistent with the employee classifications and estimated staff hours. If higher-salaried personnel of the firm, including the Principal Engineer, perform services that are to be performed by lesser-salaried personnel, the wage rate billed for such services shall be commensurate with the payroll rate for the work performed. 3. That the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections required as a result of the ENGINEER'S error, omissions or negligent acts without additional compensation. Acceptance of work by the LPA or DEPARTMENT will not relieve the ENGINEER of the responsibility to make subsequent correction of any such errors or omissions or the responsibility for clarifying ambiguities. 4. That the ENGINEER will comply with applicable Federal laws and regulations, State of Illinois Statutes, and the local laws or ordinances of the LPA. 5. To pay its subconsultants for satisfactory performance no later than 30 days from receipt of each payment from the LPA. 6. To invoice the LPA for Preliminary and/or Design Engineering: The ENGINEER shall submit all invoices to the LPA within three months of the completion of the work called for in the AGREEMENT or any subsequent Amendment or Supplement. 7. To submit a completed BLR 05613, Engineering Payment Report, to the DEPARTMENT within three months of the completion of the work called for in this AGREEMENT or any subsequent Amendment or Supplement. The form shall be submitted with the final invoice. 8. The ENGINEER or subconsultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the performance of this AGREEMENT. The ENGINEER shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the administration of US Department of Transportation (US DOT) assisted contract. Failure by the Engineer to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT, which may result in the termination of this AGREEMENT or such other remedy as the LPA deems appropriate. 9. That none of the services to be furnished by the ENGINEER shall be sublet assigned or transferred to any other party or parties without written consent of the LPA. The consent to sublet, assign or otherwise transfer any portion of the services to be furnished by the ENGINEER shall be construed to relieve the ENGINEER of any responsibility for the fulfillment of this AGREEMENT. 10. For Construction Engineering Contracts: (a) The ENGINEER shall be prequalified with the STATE in Construction Inspection. All employees of the ENGINEER serving as the onsite resident construction supervisor or providing construction inspection shall have a valid Documentation of Contract Quantities certification. (b) For all projects where testing is required, the ENGINEER shall obtain samples according to the STATE Bureau of Materials. "Manual of Test Procedures for Materials," submit STATE Bureau of Materials inspection reports; and verify compliance with contract specifications. 11. That the engineering services shall include all equipment, instruments, supplies, transportation and personnel required to perform the duties of the ENGINEER in connection with this AGREEMENT (See DIRECT COST tab in BLR 05513 or BLR 05514). II. THE LPA AGREES, 1. To certify by execution of this AGREEMENT that the selection of the ENGINEER was performed in accordance with the following: (a) Professional Services Selection Act (50 ILCS 510), The Brooks Act (40 USC 11), and the Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering, and Design Related Services (23 CFR part 172). Exhibit C is required to be completed with this AGREEMENT. 2. To furnish the ENGINEER all presently available survey data, plans, specifications, and project information. 3. For Construction Engineering Contracts: (a) To furnish a full time LPA employee to be In Responsible Charge authorized to administer inherently governmental PROJECT activities. (b) To submit approved forms BC 775 and BC 776 to the DEPARTMENT when federal funds are utilized. 4. To pay the ENGINEER: Page 6 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 3 of 11Completed09/23/22 Specific Rate Cost plus Fixed Fee:Fixed Lump Sum Total Compensation = DL + DC + OH + FF Where: DL is the total Direct Labor, DC is the total Direct Cost, OH is the firm's overhead rate applied to their DL and FF is the Fixed Fee. Where FF = (0.33 + R) DL + %SubDL, where R is the advertised Complexity Factor and %SubDL is 10% profit allowed on the direct labor of the subconsultants. The Fixed Fee cannot exceed 15% of the DL + OH. Field Office Overhead Rates: Field rates must be used for construction engineering projects expected to exceed one year in duration or if the construction engineering contract exceeds $1,000,000 for any project duration. 6. The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national original or sex in the award and performance of any US DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of US DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR part 26 and as approved by US DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as violation of this AGREEMENT. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C 3801 et seq.). (a) For progressive payments - Upon receipt of monthly invoices from the ENGINEER and the approval thereof by the LPA, monthly payments for the work performed shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER, such payments to be equal to the value of the partially completed work minus all previous partial payments made to the ENGINEER. (b) Final Payment - Upon approval of the work by the LPA but not later than 60 days after the work is completed and reports have been made and accepted by LPA and DEPARTMENT, a sum of money equal to the basic fee as determined in this AGREEMENT less the total of the amount of partial payments previously paid to the ENGINEER shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER. 5. To pay the ENGINEER as compensation for all services rendered in accordance with the AGREEMENT on the basis of the following compensation method as discussed in 5-5.10 of the BLR Manual. Method of Compensation: 1. No work shall be commenced by the ENGINEER prior to issuance by the IDOT of a written Notice to Proceed. 2. To maintain, for a minimum of 3 years after the completion of the contract, adequate books, records and supporting documents to verify the amount, recipients and uses of all disbursements of funds passing in conjunction with the contract; the contract and all books, records and supporting documents related to the contract shall be available for review and audit by the Auditor General, and the DEPARTMENT, the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) or any authorized representative of the federal government, and to provide full access to all relevant materials. Failure to maintain the books, records and supporting documents required by this section shall establish a presumption in favor of the DEPARTMENT for the recovery of any funds paid by the DEPARTMENT under the contract for which adequate books, records and supporting documentation are not available to support their purported disbursement. 3. That the ENGINEER shall be responsible for any and all damages to property or persons arising out of an error, omission and/or negligent act in the prosecution of the ENGINEER's work and shall indemnify and save harmless the LPA, the DEPARMTENT, and their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, claims, actions or damage liabilities, costs or damages of any nature whatsoever resulting there from. These indemnities shall not be limited by the listing of any insurance policy. The LPA will notify the ENGINEER of any error or omission believed by the LPA to be caused by the negligence of the ENGINEER as soon as practicable after the discovery. The LPA reserves the right to take immediate action to remedy any error or omission if notification is not successful; if the ENGINEER fails to reply to a notification; or if the conditions created by the error or omission are in need of urgent correction to avoid accumulation of additional construction costs or damages to property and reasonable notice is not practicable. 4. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the LPA upon giving notice in writing to the ENGINEER at the ENGINEER's last known post office address. Upon such termination, the ENGINEER shall cause to be delivered to the LPA all drawings, plats, surveys, reports, permits, agreements, soils and foundation analysis, provisions, specifications, partial and completed estimates and data, if any from soil survey and subsurface investigation with the understanding that all such material becomes the property of the LPA. The LPA will be responsible for reimbursement of all eligible expenses incurred under the terms of this AGREEMENT up to the date of the written notice of termination. III. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED, Page 7 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 4 of 11Completed09/23/22 5. In the event that the DEPARMENT stops payment to the LPA, the LPA may suspend work on the project. If this agreement is suspended by the LPA for more than thirty (30) calendar days, consecutive or in aggregate, over the term of this AGREEMENT, the ENGINEER shall be compensated for all services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred as a result of the suspension and resumption of its services, and the ENGINEER's schedule and fees for the remainder of the project shall be equitably adjusted. 6. This AGREEMENT shall continue as an open contract and the obligations created herein shall remain in full force and effect until the completion of construction of any phase of professional services performed by others based upon the service provided herein. All obligations of the ENGINEER accepted under this AGREEMENT shall cease if construction or subsequent professional services are not commenced within 5 years after final payment by the LPA. 7. That the ENGINEER shall be responsible for any and all damages to property or persons arising out of an error, omission and/or negligent act in the prosecution of the ENGINEER's work and shall indemnify and have harmless the LPA, the DEPARTMENT, and their officers, employees from all suits, claims, actions or damages liabilities, costs or damages of any nature whatsoever resulting there from. These indemnities shall not be limited by the listing of any insurance policy. 8.The ENGINEER and LPA certify that their respective firm or agency: (a) has not employed or retained for commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other considerations, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the LPA or the ENGINEER) to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT, (b) has not agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this AGREEMENT, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the AGREEMENT or (c) has not paid, or agreed to pay any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the LPA or the ENGINEER) any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the AGREEMENT. (d) that neither the ENGINEER nor the LPA is/are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency, (e) has not within a three-year period preceding the AGREEMENT been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or receiving stolen property, (f) are not presently indicated for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (e) and (g) has not within a three-year period preceding this AGREEMENT had one or more public transaction (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. Where the ENGINEER or LPA is unable to certify to any of the above statements in this certification, an explanation shall be attached to this AGREEMENT. 9. In the event of delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control of and without fault or negligence of the ENGINEER no claim for damages shall be made by either party. Termination of the AGREEMENT or adjustment of the fee for the remaining services may be requested by either party if the overall delay from the unforeseen causes prevents completion of the work within six months after the specified completion date. Examples of unforeseen causes include but are not limited to: acts of God or a public enemy; act of the LPA, DEPARTMENT, or other approving party not resulting from the ENGINEER's unacceptable services; fire; strikes; and floods. If delays occur due to any cause preventing compliance with the PROJECT SCHEDULE, the ENGINEER shall apply in writing to the LPA for an extension of time. If approved, the PROJECT SCHEDULE shall be revised accordingly. 10. This certification is required by the Drug Free Workplace Act (30 ILCS 580). The Drug Free Workplace Act requires that no grantee or contractor shall receive a grant or be considered for the purpose of being awarded a contract for the procurement of any property or service from the DEPARTMENT unless that grantee or contractor will provide a drug free workplace. False certification or violation of the certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited or suspension of contract on grant payments, termination of a contract or grant and debarment of the contracting or grant opportunities with the DEPARTMENT for at least one (1) year but not more than (5) years. For the purpose of this certification, "grantee" or "Contractor" means a corporation, partnership or an entity with twenty-five (25) or more employees at the time of issuing the grant or a department, division or other unit thereof, directly responsible for the specific performance under contract or grant of $5,000 or more from the DEPARTMENT, as defined the Act. The contractor/grantee certifies and agrees that it will provide a drug free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement: (1) Notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance, including cannabis, is prohibited in the grantee's or contractor's workplace. (2) Specifying actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. (3) Notifying the employee that, as a condition of employment on such contract or grant, the employee will: (a) abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) notify the employer of any criminal drug statue conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than (5) days after such conviction. (b) Establishing a drug free awareness program to inform employees about: Page 8 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 5 of 11Completed09/23/22 (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's or contractor's policy to maintain a drug free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon an employee for drug violations. (c) Providing a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (a) to each employee engaged in the performance of the contract or grant and to post the statement in a prominent place in the workplace. (d) Notifying the contracting, or granting agency within ten (10) days after receiving notice under part (b) of paragraph (3) of subsection (a) above from an employee or otherwise, receiving actual notice of such conviction. (e) Imposing a sanction on, or requiring the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program. (f) Assisting employees in selecting a course of action in the event drug counseling, treatment and rehabilitation is required and indicating that a trained referral team is in place. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free workplace through implementation of the Drug Free Workplace Act, the ENGINEER, LPA and the Department agree to meet the PROJECT SCHEDULE outlined in EXHIBIT B. Time is of the essence on this project and the ENGINEER's ability to meet the PROJECT SCHEDULE will be a factor in the LPA selecting the ENGINEER for future project. The ENGINEER will submit progress reports with each invoice showing work that was completed during the last reporting period and work they expect to accomplish during the following period. 11. Due to the physical location of the project, certain work classifications may be subject to the Prevailing Wage Act (820 ILCS 130/0.01 et seq.). 12. For Construction Engineering Contracts: (a) That all services are to be furnished as required by construction progress and as determined by the LPA employee In Responsible Charge. The ENGINEER shall complete all services herein within a time considered reasonable to the LPA, after the CONTRACTOR has completed the construction contract. (b) That all field notes, test records and reports shall be turned over to and become the property of the LPA and that during the performance of the engineering services herein provided for, the ENGINEER shall be responsible for any loss or damage to the documents herein enumerated while they are in the ENGINEER's possession and any such loss or damage shall be restored at the ENGINEER's expense. (c)That any difference between the ENGINEER and the LPA concerning the interpretation of the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall be referred to a committee of disinterested parties consisting of one member appointed by the ENGINEER, one member appointed by the LPA, and a third member appointed by the two other members for disposition and that the committee's decision shall be final. (d) That in the event that engineering and inspection services to be furnished and performed by the LPA (including personnel furnished by the ENGINEER) shall, in the opinion of the STATE be incompetent employed on such work at the expense of the LPA. (e) Inspection of all materials when inspection is not provided by the sources by the STATE Central Bureau of Materials, and submit inspection reports to the LPA and STATE in accordance with the STATE Central Bureau of Materials "Project Procedures Guide" and the policies of the STATE. AGREEMENT SUMMARY Prime Consultant (Firm) Name TIN/FEIN/SS Number Agreement Amount Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd.36-3468939 $150,625.00 Subconsultants TIN/FEIN/SS Number Agreement Amount Soil & Material Consultants, Inc.36-3094075 $8,000.00 Subconsultant Total $8,000.00 Prime Consultant Total $150,625.00 Total for all work $158,625.00 Page 9 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 6 of 11Completed09/23/22 AGREEMENT SIGNATURES Local Public Agency Type City Local Public Agency Des Plaines Local Public Agency Type City Clerk (SEAL) Title Attest: The of Local Public Agency Des Plaines Executed by the ENGINEER: Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. Title Vice President Attest: Title President By (Signature & Date)By (Signature & Date) By (Signature & Date)By (Signature & Date) Page 10 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 7 of 11 Section Number 20-00224-00-BT County Cook Local Public Agency Des Plaines Completed09/23/22 Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES To perform or be responsible for the performance of the engineering services for the LPA, in connection with the PROJECT herein before described and enumerated below The City of Des Plaines has initiated a project requiring Phase III Professional Engineering Services by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) for the proposed Oakton Street Sidepath Project. The project consists of constructing a sidepath for pedestrian and bicycle access. A refuge median and beacon improvements are also included to improve the safety of the existing Des Plaines River Trail crossing at Oakton Street. CBBEL will serve as the City’s representative during the entire duration of the construction project. The following scope is to be performed by CBBEL throughout the project duration. Task 1 - Preconstruction Services Review of Existing Data: Resident Engineer and staff will review plans, specifications and contract documents. Preconstruction Meeting: CBBEL staff will attend and take meeting minutes for the preconstruction meeting held at IDOT. Task 2 - Construction Inspection This task assumes full time construction observation of a construction schedule of 80 Working Days by the Contractor. Shop Drawing / Submittal Review CBBEL staff will review shop drawings and submittals for the traffic signal items, detector loop replacement, concrete mixtures, ADA sidewalk panels, and other elements as required. This task includes check and approve, or reject and request resubmittal of, any submittals made by the Contractor for compliance with the contract documents. Shop Drawings and Contractor Submittals: • Record data received, maintain a file of drawings and submissions, and check construction for compliance with them. • Review Contractor’s submittals for compliance with contract documents. Notify the City of any deviations or substitutions. With the notification, provide the City with a recommendation for acceptance or denial, and request direction from the City regarding the deviation or substitution. Observation Services: CBBEL staff will perform the following tasks daily or as required by the Contractor’s activities: • Complete all documentation required by IDOT Policy. • Assign and schedule all field and material inspection and maintain daily contact with the Contractor’s personnel to proficiently provide the engineering services necessary for the Contractor’s continued progress. • Direct client contact on project related issues. • Observe and document traffic control. • Observe daily construction for compliance to the plans and specifications. • Coordinate daily with Contractor on work and schedule. • Manage and quality control of construction engineering staff. • Maintain a daily record of the Contractor’s activities throughout construction including information to permit Page 11 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 8 of 11 Section Number 20-00224-00-BT County Cook Local Public Agency Des Plaines Completed09/23/22 Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. verification of the nature and costs of changes in plans and authorized extra work. • Prepare and submit all partial and final payment estimates, change orders, records, certifications, documentation, and reports. This documentation will be completed using the Construction and Materials Management System (CMMS). • Prepare and submit all partial and final material documentation. This documentation will be completed using the MISTIC Entry Database. • Conduct project meetings (as required). Task 3 - Construction Documentation 1. Keep an inspector’s daily report book and project diary in the City’s format, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, general and specific observations, daily activities, quantities placed, inspections, decisions, and list of visiting officials, as outlined in IDOT’s Construction Manual. Additionally, prepare photo documentation of construction to be submitted in both hard and digital formatting. 2. Prepare payment requisitions and change orders. Review applications for payment with the Contractor for compliance with established submission procedure and forward them with recommendations to the City. Maintain a Change Management Plan logging all decisions and approved changes of scope and budget. 3. Schedule any material testing through the City’s Consultant at the frequency required by IDOT’s QC/QA provisions. Also obtain and document all material inspection received from the Contractor as outlined in the Project Procedures Guide of IDOT’s Construction Manual. 4. Prepare a monthly written update to the City summarizing the Project status, costs and schedule. 5. Review and coordinate response to any RFI from the Contractor in a timely manner and maintain a separate file for each request. Task 4 - Materials QA Testing The Contractor will be required to provide the Quality Control (QC) Testing required by the plans and specifications. The Phase III Engineering Services will be required to provide the subsequent Quality Assurance (QA) Testing. The testing requirements and frequency of testing will be as required and outlined in the IDOT Manual for Materials Testing Inspection and Procedures. Materials Testing will be performed by Soil & Materials Consultants, Inc. Task 5 - NPDES Compliance CBBEL will perform weekly erosion control inspection per IDOT Document Standards. Task 6 - Project Closeout Prepare Punchlist: CBBEL staff will prepare and distribute the final punchlist to all parties and verify when completed. Final Documentation: • Final documentation, IDOT audit, and project closeout with City of St. Des Plaines and IDOT. • Final mark-up of record drawings (redlines). Page 12 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 9 of 11 Section Number 20-00224-00-BT County Cook Local Public Agency Des Plaines Completed09/23/22 Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. EXHIBIT B PROJECT SCHEDULE PreConstruction - 4/15/23 - 4/30/23 Construction Inspection 5/1/23 - 9/15/23 Dcoumentation - As Needed Project Close-Out 9/16/23 - 10/30/23 NPDES - As Needed Page 13 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 10 of 11 Section Number 20-00224-00-BT County Cook Local Public Agency Des Plaines Completed09/23/22 Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. Exhibit C Qualification Based Selection (QBS) Checklist The LPA must complete Exhibit D. If the value meets or will exceed the threshold in 50 ILCS 510, QBS requirements must be followed. Under the threshold, QBS requirements do not apply. The threshold is adjusted annually. If the value is under the threshold with federal funds being used, federal small purchase guidelines must be followed. Form Not Applicable (engineering services less than the threshold) Items 1-13 are required when using federal funds and QBS process is applicable. Items 14-16 are required when using State funds and the QBS process is applicable. No Yes 1 Do the written QBS policies and procedures discuss the initial administration (procurement, management and administration) concerning engineering and design related consultant services? 2 Do the written QBS policies and procedures follow the requirements as outlined in Section 5-5 and specifically Section 5-5.06 (e) of the BLRS Manual? 3 Was the scope of services for this project clearly defined? 4 Was public notice given for this project? If yes Due date of submittal 08/26/22 Method(s) used for advertisement and dates of advertisement Village Website 5 Do the written QBS policies and procedures cover conflicts of interest? 6 Do the written QBS policies and procedures use covered methods of verification for suspension and debarment? 7 Do the written QBS policies and procedures discuss the methods of evaluation? Project Criteria Weighting Firm Experience 30% Staff Experience 30% Staff Resources 20% Past Performance 10% IDOT Prequalification 10% 8 Do the written QBS policies and procedures discuss the method of selection? Selection committee (titles) for this project Selection Committee Organized by the City Top three consultants ranked for this project in order 1 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 2 Civiltech Engineering, Inc. 3 Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 9 Was an estimated cost of engineering for this project developed in-house prior to contract negotiation? 10 Were negotiations for this project performed in accordance with federal requirements. 11 Were acceptable costs for this project verified? 12 Do the written QBS policies and procedures cover review and approving for payment, before forwarding the request for reimbursement to IDOT for further review and approval? 13 Do the written QBS policies and procedures cover ongoing and finalizing administration of the project (monitoring, evaluation, closing-out a contract, records retention, responsibility, remedies to violations or breaches to a contract, and resolution of disputes)? 14 QBS according to State requirements used? 15 Existing relationship used in lieu of QBS process? Page 14 of 32Attachment 1 BLR 05530 (Rev. 07/08/22)Page 11 of 11 Section Number 20-00224-00-BT County Cook Local Public Agency Des Plaines Completed09/23/22 Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Christopher B. Burke Eng. Ltd. 16 LPA is a home rule community (Exempt from QBS). Page 15 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Prepared By Date Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Remarks CONTRACT TERM 5 MONTHS OVERHEAD RATE 126.53% START DATE 5/1/2023 COMPLEXITY FACTOR RAISE DATE 1/1/2024 % OF RAISE 2.00% END DATE 9/30/2023 Year First Date Last Date Months % of Contract 0 5/1/2023 9/30/2023 5 100.00% ESCALATION PER YEAR PAYROLL ESCALATION TABLE EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Sherry Sporina 9/22/2022 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Note: This is name of the consultant the CECS is being completed for. This name appears at the top of each tab. BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) ESCALATION Page 16 of 32Attachment 1 The total escalation =0.00% BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) ESCALATION Page 17 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number City of Des Plaines 20-00224-00-BT Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATE 78.00 ESCALATION FACTOR 0.00% IDOT CLASSIFICATION PAYROLL RATES CALCULATED RATE ON FILE Principal $78.00 $78.00 Engineer VI $77.90 $77.90 Engineer V $69.77 $69.77 Engineer IV $58.58 $58.58 Engineer III $47.01 $47.01 Engineer I/II $33.72 $33.72 Survey V $78.00 $78.00 Survey IV $72.00 $72.00 Survey III $63.00 $63.00 Survey II $51.50 $51.50 Survey I $38.50 $38.50 Engineering Technician V $67.75 $67.75 Engineering Technician IV $56.63 $56.63 Engineering Technician III $32.88 $32.88 CAD Manager $67.17 $67.17 CAD Technician II $48.75 $48.75 GIS Speciailist III $54.00 $54.00 Landscape Architect $61.00 $61.00 Landscape Designer I/II $34.75 $34.75 Environmental Resource Specialist V $75.06 $75.06 Environmental Resource Specialist IV $58.00 $58.00 Environmental Resource Specialist III $49.75 $49.75 Environmental Resource Specialist I/II $30.50 $30.50 Environmental Resource Technician $42.75 $42.75 Engineering Itern $19.00 $19.00 EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE PAYROLL RATES Cook Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) RATES Page 18 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number NAME Direct Labor Total Contribution to Prime Consultant Material Testing 8,000.00 800.00 Total 8,000.00 800.00 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. NOTE: Only subconsultants who fill out a cost estimate that splits out direct labor may be listed on this sheet. SUBCONSULTANTS EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) SUBS Page 19 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number QUANTITY CONTRACT RATE TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 100 $65.00 $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2 $40.00 $80.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,580.00 DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for reimbursement by the LPA on this project. EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET ITEM ALLOWABLE Lodging (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) Actual Cost (Up to state rate maximum) Lodging Taxes and Fees (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD)Actual Cost Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weeks' notice, with prior IDOT approval Vehicle Mileage (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD)Up to state rate maximum Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) Tolls Actual Cost Parking Actual Cost Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation) Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house)Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside)Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost Monuments (Permanent)Actual Cost Photo Processing Actual Cost 2-Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only)Actual Cost Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only)Actual Cost CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Recording Fees Actual Cost Transcriptions (specific to project)Actual Cost Courthouse Fees Actual Cost Storm Sewer Cleaning and Televising Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Traffic Control and Protection Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Aerial Photography and Mapping Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Utliity Exploratory Trenching Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Testing of Soil Samples Actual Cost Lab Services Actual Cost (Provide breakdown of each cost) Equipment and/or Specialized Equipment Rental Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) DIRECT COSTS Page 20 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number OVERHEAD RATE 126.53%0 TASK STAFF HOURS PAYROLL OVERHEAD & FRINGE BENEFITS DIRECT COSTS FIXED FEE SERVICES BY OTHERS TOTAL % OF GRAND TOTAL Construction Inspection 1210 46,104 58,336 $6,580.00 15,214 126,234 79.58% Pre-Construction 41 2,101 2,658 693 5,452 3.44% Construction Documentation 30 1,410 1,784 465 3,659 2.31% Project Close-Out 135 4,925 6,232 1,625 12,782 8.06% NPDES Inspection 10 751 950 248 1,949 1.23% Material Testing - - - 8,000 8,000 5.04% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Subconsultant DL 542 542 0.34% TOTALS 1426 55,291 69,960 6,580 18,787 8,000 158,625 100.00% 125,251 The subconsultant fee has been adjusted due to 15% fixed fee COMPLEXITY FACTOR City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) COST EST Page 21 of 32Attachment 1 Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES SHEET 1 OF 1 PAYROLL AVG TOTAL PROJ. RATES HOURLY Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd CLASSIFICATION RATES Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Principal 78.00 0.0 Engineer VI 77.90 35.0 2.45%1.91 30 2.48%1.93 5 12.20%9.50 Engineer V 69.77 0.0 Engineer IV 58.58 195.0 13.67%8.01 160 13.22%7.75 20 48.78%28.58 15 11.11%6.51 Engineer III 47.01 30.0 2.10%0.99 30 100.00%47.01 Engineer I/II 33.72 1,156.0 81.07%27.34 1020 84.30%28.43 16 39.02%13.16 120 88.89%29.97 Survey V 78.00 0.0 Survey IV 72.00 0.0 Survey III 63.00 0.0 Survey II 51.50 0.0 Survey I 38.50 0.0 Engineering Technician V 67.75 0.0 Engineering Technician IV 56.63 0.0 Engineering Technician III 32.88 0.0 CAD Manager 67.17 0.0 CAD Technician II 48.75 0.0 GIS Speciailist III 54.00 0.0 Landscape Architect 61.00 0.0 Landscape Designer I/II 34.75 0.0 Environmental Resource Sp 75.06 10.0 0.70%0.53 10 100.00%75.06 Environmental Resource Sp 58.00 0.0 Environmental Resource Sp 49.75 0.0 Environmental Resource Sp 30.50 0.0 Environmental Resource Te 42.75 0.0 Engineering Itern 19.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 1426.0 100%$38.77 1210.0 100.00%$38.10 41.0 100%$51.23 30.0 100%$47.01 135.0 100%$36.48 10.0 100%$75.06 EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET 20-00224-00-BTCookCity of Des Plaines Construction Inspection Pre-Construction Construction Documentation Project Close-Out NPDES Inspection Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. BLR 05514 (Rev. 05/27/22) AVG 1 Page 22 of 32Attachment 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 236 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION TO CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. FOR OAKTON STREET SIDEPATH CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution R-13-23, authorizing the City to enter into a Local Public Agency Engineering Services Agreement ("Agreement") with Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. ("Consultant") for construction engineering services required for the Oakton Street Sidepath project in the not to exceed amount of $158,625.00; and WHEREAS, additional construction engineering services were needed from the Consultant during the construction phase of the Oakton Street Sidepath project in the amount of $38,959.00 (“Additional Services”); and WHEREAS, the City desires to approve the Statement of Supplemental Compensation provided by the Consultant in the not-to-exceed amount of $38,959.00 (“Statement of Supplemental Compensation”); and WHEREAS, the City has sufficient funds in the Capital Projects Fund to procure the Statement of Supplemental Compensation in the not-to-exceed amount of $38,959.00; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF STATEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION. The City Council hereby approves the Statement of Supplemental Compensation in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form to be approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE STATEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, Statement of Supplemental Compensation. Page 23 of 32 SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this ___ day of _________________, 2023. APPROVED this ___ day of ____________________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 24 of 32 November 9, 2023 City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 Attention: Tim Oakley, PE, Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Oakton Street Sidepath (CBBEL Project No. 220460) Dear Mr. Oakley: Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) is requesting supplemental compensation for the above referenced project. IDOT allowed the contractor to mobilize April 3, 2023 prior to the allowed start of Working Days. CBBEL’s original contract was based on a May 1, 2023 start. During the construction phase of this project, CBBEL encountered unanticipated efforts due to coordination with the Army Corp of Engineers and MWRD regarding work around the Des Plaines River. We also needed to dedicate additional efforts to coordinate work around existing utilities including exploration of and adjustment of a District 207 fiber optic cable that conflicted with piles which needed to be driven for bridge modifications. We have provided a detailed cost breakdown for this supplement on the attached worksheets. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, W. Daniel Crosson, PE Executive Vice President Head, Construction Engineering Department Attachment Page 25 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number Prime Consultant (Firm) Name Prepared By Date Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number Remarks CONTRACT TERM 2 MONTHS OVERHEAD RATE 132.88% START DATE 11/1/2023 COMPLEXITY FACTOR RAISE DATE 1/1/2024 % OF RAISE 2.00% END DATE 12/31/2023 Year First Date Last Date Months % of Contract 0 11/1/2023 12/31/2023 2 100.00% The total escalation =0.00% ESCALATION PER YEAR PAYROLL ESCALATION TABLE EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Dan Crosson 11/9/2023 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Note: This is name of the consultant the CECS is being completed for. This name appears at the top of each tab. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 2 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) ESCALATION Page 26 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number OVERHEAD RATE 132.88%0 TASK DIRECT COSTS (not included in row totals)STAFF HOURS PAYROLL OVERHEAD & FRINGE BENEFITS FIXED FEE SERVICES BY OTHERS TOTAL % OF GRAND TOTAL Construction Inspection 190 11,092 14,739 3,660 29,491 75.70% Pre-Construction - - - - 0.00% Construction Documentation - - - - 0.00% Project Close-Out 61 3,561 4,732 1,175 9,468 24.30% NPDES Inspection - - - - 0.00% Material Testing - - - - 0.00% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Subconsultant DL $0.00 Direct Costs Total ===>$0.00 $0.00 TOTALS 251 14,653 19,471 4,835 - 38,959 100.00% 34,124 COMPLEXITY FACTOR City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 5 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) COST EST Page 27 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES SHEET 1 OF 1 PAYROLL AVG TOTAL PROJ. RATES HOURLY Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd CLASSIFICATION RATES Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Engineer VI 84.21 0.0 Engineer V 71.16 0.0 Engineer IV 58.38 251.0 100.00%58.38 190 100.00%58.38 61 100.00%58.38 Engineer III 46.57 0.0 Engineer I/II 33.60 0.0 Survey V 81.89 0.0 Survey IV 74.00 0.0 Survey III 64.75 0.0 Survey II 53.00 0.0 Survey I 37.56 0.0 Engineering Technician V 70.17 0.0 Engineering Technician IV 61.81 0.0 Engineering Technician III 38.25 0.0 Engineering Technician I/II 23.33 0.0 CAD Manager 68.83 0.0 CAD Technician II 51.81 0.0 GIS Speciailist III 56.00 0.0 Landscape Architect 63.00 0.0 Landscape Designer I/II 36.50 0.0 Environmental Resource S 73.70 0.0 Environmental Resource S 60.58 0.0 Environmental Resource S 51.25 0.0 Environmental Resource S 29.13 0.0 Environmental Resource Te 44.00 0.0 Engineering Itern 18.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTALS 251.0 100%$58.38 190.0 100.00%$58.38 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 61.0 100%$58.38 0.0 0%$0.00 EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET 20-00224-00-BTCookCity of Des Plaines Construction Inspection Pre-Construction Construction Documentation Project Close-Out NPDES Inspection Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 6 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) AVG 1 Page 28 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES SHEET 2 OF 1 PAYROLL AVG HOURLY Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd Hours %Wgtd CLASSIFICATION RATES Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Part.Avg Engineer VI 84.21 Engineer V 71.16 Engineer IV 58.38 Engineer III 46.57 Engineer I/II 33.60 Survey V 81.89 Survey IV 74.00 Survey III 64.75 Survey II 53.00 Survey I 37.56 Engineering Technician V 70.17 Engineering Technician IV 61.81 Engineering Technician III 38.25 Engineering Technician I/II 23.33 CAD Manager 68.83 CAD Technician II 51.81 GIS Speciailist III 56.00 Landscape Architect 63.00 Landscape Designer I/II 36.50 Environmental Resource Spe 73.70 Environmental Resource Spe 60.58 Environmental Resource Spe 51.25 Environmental Resource Spe 29.13 Environmental Resource Tech 44.00 Engineering Itern 18.67 TOTALS 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 0.0 0%$0.00 EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET Cook 20-00224-00-BTCity of Des Plaines Material Testing Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 7 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) AVG 2Page 29 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number City of Des Plaines 20-00224-00-BT Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATE 86.00 ESCALATION FACTOR 0.00% IDOT CLASSIFICATION PAYROLL RATES CALCULATED RATE ON FILE Engineer VI $84.21 $84.21 Engineer V $71.16 $71.16 Engineer IV $58.38 $58.38 Engineer III $46.57 $46.57 Engineer I/II $33.60 $33.60 Survey V $81.89 $81.89 Survey IV $74.00 $74.00 Survey III $64.75 $64.75 Survey II $53.00 $53.00 Survey I $37.56 $37.56 Engineering Technician V $70.17 $70.17 Engineering Technician IV $61.81 $61.81 Engineering Technician III $38.25 $38.25 Engineering Technician I/II $23.33 $23.33 CAD Manager $68.83 $68.83 CAD Technician II $51.81 $51.81 GIS Speciailist III $56.00 $56.00 Landscape Architect $63.00 $63.00 Landscape Designer I/II $36.50 $36.50 Environmental Resource Specialist V $73.70 $73.70 Environmental Resource Specialist IV $60.58 $60.58 Environmental Resource Specialist III $51.25 $51.25 Environmental Resource Specialist I/II $29.13 $29.13 Environmental Resource Technician $44.00 $44.00 Engineering Itern $18.67 $18.67 EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE PAYROLL RATES Cook Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 3 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) RATES Page 30 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number NAME Direct Labor Total Contribution to Prime Consultant Total 0.00 0.00 Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. NOTE: Only subconsultants who fill out a cost estimate that splits out direct labor may be listed on this sheet. SUBCONSULTANTS EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 1 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) SUBS Page 31 of 32Exhibit A Local Public Agency County Section Number Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number QUANTITY CONTRACT RATE TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: Lab Services Actual Cost (Provide breakdown of each cost) Equipment and/or Specialized Equipment Rental Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Aerial Photography and Mapping Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Utliity Exploratory Trenching Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Testing of Soil Samples Actual Cost Courthouse Fees Actual Cost Storm Sewer Cleaning and Televising Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Traffic Control and Protection Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Recording Fees Actual Cost Transcriptions (specific to project)Actual Cost Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 2-Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only)Actual Cost Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only)Actual Cost CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost Monuments (Permanent)Actual Cost Photo Processing Actual Cost Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house)Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside)Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) Parking Actual Cost Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation) Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) Tolls Actual Cost Lodging Taxes and Fees (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD)Actual Cost Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weeks' notice, with prior IDOT approval Vehicle Mileage (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD)Up to state rate maximum List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for reimbursement by the LPA on this project. EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET ITEM ALLOWABLE Lodging (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) Actual Cost (Up to state rate maximum) DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET City of Des Plaines Cook 20-00224-00-BT Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. Printed 11/9/2023 1:40 PM Page 4 of 7 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) DIRECT COSTS Page 32 of 32Exhibit A PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: David Schilf, Superintendent Tom Bueser, Superintendent of General Services Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Parkway Restoration and Planting with Installation Services — Renewal Term Issue: The 2024 budget includes funding for contractual parkway restoration and planting with installation services at various locations throughout the City. Analysis: The City Council approved a one-year contract for 2023 with T and T Landscape Construction, Inc. at its November 21, 2022 meeting. The contract includes up to two additional one-year renewal terms. The Public Works and Engineering Department utilizes outside contractors to provide restoration to various locations due to the excavation of water main breaks and sewer repairs as well as providing planting installation services. This work is required throughout the year on an as needed basis. This would be the first renewal term which would commence on April 1, 2024. Public Works and Engineering staff has contacted TNT Landscape Construction, Inc. who performed well last year and will be maintaining the contractual pricing submitted in 2022. Recommendation: We recommend approval of the first renewal term of the Parkway Restoration and Planting with Installation Services Contract with T and T Landscape Construction, Inc., 847 S. Randall Road, Suite 334, Elgin, Illinois, 60123 per unit pricing in the amount not to exceed $100,000. Source of funding will be the Water Fund, R&M Water Distribution (500-00-550- 0000.6335), and General Fund, Street Maintenance Miscellaneous Contractual Services (100-50- 535-0000.6195) accounts. Attachments: Resolution R-237-23 Exhibit A – TNT Landscape Construction, Inc. First Renewal and Contract MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 16 CONSENT AGENDA #6. 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 237 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST RENEWAL OF A CONTRACT WITH TNT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR PARKWAY RESTORATION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION SERVICES. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution R-184-22, approving a one-year contract ("Contract") with TNT Landscape Construction, Inc. ("Contractor") for 2023 parkway restoration and planting installation services ("Work"); and WHEREAS, the Contract expires on December 15, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Contract provides that the City and Contractor may mutually agree to renew the Contract for two additional one-year terms; and WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to renew the Contract for an additional one- year term beginning April 1, 2024 and ending December 15, 2024 in the not-to-exceed amount of $100,000.00 ("First Renewal"); and WHEREAS, the City has appropriated sufficient funds in the General Fund, Water Fund, and R&M Water Distribution Fund for the procurement of the Work; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the First Renewal with Contractor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF FIRST RENEWAL. The City Council hereby approves the First Renewal in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION OF FIRST RENEWAL. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final First Renewal only after receipt by the City Clerk of at least two executed copies of the First Renewal from Contractor; provided, however, that if the City Clerk does not receive such Page 2 of 16 2 executed copies of the First Renewal from Contractor within 60 days after the date of adoption of this Resolution, then this authority to execute and seal the First Renewal shall, at the option of the City Council, be null and void. SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Renewal of Contract with TNT Landscape Construction Inc. (2023) Page 3 of 16 FIRST RENEWAL OF THE CONTRACT FOR 2023 PARKWAY RESTORATION AND PLANTING WITH INSTALLATION SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF DES PLAINES AND TNT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. THIS FIRST RENEWAL is made and entered into as of the ______ day of ____________, 2023, by and between the City of Des Plaines, an Illinois home rule municipal corporation (“Owner”), and TNT Landscape Construction, Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the recitals and mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this First Renewal, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals. A. The Owner and the Contractor entered into a certain "2023 Parkway Restoration and Planting with Installation Services" dated as of 11/22/22 ("Contract"), under which Contract the Owner agreed to procure from the Contractor certain work, including parkway restoration and planting with installation services, all as more fully described in the Contract and the attachments thereto (collectively, "Work"), and the Contractor agreed to complete the Work for the Owner. B.Section 3 of the Contract provides that prior to the termination of the then- current term, the Owner and the Contractor may renew the Contract for an additional one- year term by executing a written agreement; provided, however, that the Owner and the Contractor may not renew the Contract for more than two one-year terms after the expiration of the Initial Term described in Section 3 of the Contract. C.The Initial Term will expire on December 15, 2023, and the Owner and the Contractor desire to renew the Contract for a one-year renewal term that will terminate on December 15, 2024 ("First Renewal Term") in accordance with the provisions, terms, and conditions of this First Renewal. Section 2. Definitions. All capitalized words and phrases used throughout this First Renewal have the meanings set forth in the various provisions of this First Renewal. If a word or phrase is not specifically defined in this First Renewal, it has the same meaning as in the Contract. Section 3. First Renewal of the Contract. Pursuant to Section 3 of the Contract, the Owner and the Contractor hereby renew the Contract for the First Renewal Term. During the First Renewal Term, the City will pay the Contractor for the Work in accordance with the Schedule of Prices attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this First Renewal as Exhibit 1. Section 4. Effect. All terms, conditions and provisions of the Contract that are not specifically amended, modified, or supplemented by this First Renewal shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein. In the event of a conflict between the text of the Contract and the text of this First Renewal, the text of this First Renewal shall control. Exhibit A Page 4 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Renewal to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. ATTEST: CITY OF DES PLAINES City Clerk Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY Des Plaines General Counsel Dated WITNESS: TNT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. By: By: Date: Date: Exhibit A Page 5 of 16 Exhibit A Page 6 of 16 Exhibit A Page 7 of 16 Exhibit A Page 8 of 16 Exhibit A Page 9 of 16 Exhibit A Page 10 of 16 Exhibit A Page 11 of 16 Exhibit A Page 12 of 16 Exhibit A Page 13 of 16 Exhibit A Page 14 of 16 Exhibit A Page 15 of 16 Exhibit A Page 16 of 16 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Tom Bueser, Superintendent of General Services Jason Ostrowski, Superintendent Cc: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Approve Purchase for Parkway Tree Planting – Suburban Tree Consortium Issue: The approved 2024 budget includes $361,250 in funding for the purchase and planting of parkway trees. Analysis: The City of Des Plaines is a member of the West Central Municipal Conference – Suburban Tree Consortium (STC), which is comprised of 42 communities. The Consortium obtains competitive pricing for all members through a five-year contractual program for tree purchasing and planting. This purchase is presented to the City Council as a not to exceed budgeted funds expenditure. The species and number of trees to be planted will be determined through resident response and parkway planting guidelines. Recommendation: We recommend the 2024 purchase of replacement parkway trees from participating STC nurseries and planting labor through the West Central Municipal Conference – Suburban Tree Consortium, 2000 Fifth Avenue, Bldg J, River Grove, IL 60171, in the not to exceed amount of $361,250 for spring and fall plantings to be funded from General Fund, Street Maintenance Division, Tree Plantings (100-50-530-0000.6175). Attachments: Resolution R-238-23 Exhibit A – STC Schedule of Prices MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 21 CONSENT AGENDA #7. 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 238 - 23 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND PLANTING OF TREES THROUGH THE WEST CENTRAL MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE SUBURBAN TREE CONSORTIUM. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City has appropriated $361,250 in the Street Maintenance Division Tree Plantings Fund for use by the Department of Public Works and Engineering during the 2024 fiscal year for the procurement of trees and tree planting services; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the West Central Municipal Conference Suburban Tree Consortium ("Consortium"), a group of more than 40 communities created to obtain competitive pricing for the purchase of trees and the procurement tree planting services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase trees through the Consortium that will be planted in parkways throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Consortium's purchasing policies satisfy the City's competitive bidding requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to: (i) purchase trees from nurseries selected by the Consortium (collectively, the "Consortium Nurseries"); and (ii) procure tree planting services through the Consortium, all in accordance with the schedule of prices attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A ("Schedule of Prices") and in the total not-to-exceed amount of $361,250; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: AUTHORIZATION TO PROCURE. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute such documents and make such payments as are necessary to purchase of trees from the Consortium Nurseries and procure the tree planting services through the Consortium in accordance with the Schedule of Prices and in a total amount not to exceed $361,250. Page 2 of 21 2 SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this ___ day of _________________, 2023. APPROVED this ___ day of ____________________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Purchase of Trees West Municipal Conference Suburban Tree Consortium 2024 Page 3 of 21 16-Aug-21 ···-··-··· ---··-··-·--· ,---,-· -·--·--··--------···-·· ----·-··- COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Black Maple Acer niarum Ohio buckeye Aesculus alabra American hornbeam Carpinus caraliniana Pecan Carya illinoiensis Northern cataloa Catalea seeciosa Cammon hackberrv Celtis occidentalis Ginkao Ginkao biloba 'Autumn C: Ginkaa Ginkao biloba 'Princeton Kentuckv coffeetree Gvmnocladus dioica the Kentucky coffeetree Gvmnocladus dioica Butternut Juqlans cinera Swamp white oak I Ouercus bicolor Hills oak I Ouercus elliesoidalis Shinale oak I Quercus imbricaria Bur oak I Ouercus macrocarea Red oak I Ouercus rubra American Linden Tilia americana Digging Season Serina Fall Serina Fall Sprina Serina Serina Fall Sprina Fall Sprina Fall SerinCJ, Fall Serina Fall Sprina Fall Sorin□ Fall Sprina Fall Serin a Serina Sorina Sprina Serina Fall2021/ Serina 2022 Fall2022/ Serina 2023 1.5" 2" 2.5" 3" 1.5" 2" 2.5" 3" $161 $197 $161 $197 $171 $193 $171 $193 $179 $209 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $239 $289 $239 $289 $215 $254 $215 $254 $153 $215 $153 $215 $203 $218 $269 $ 344 $203 $218 $269 $ 344 $187 $209 $239 $ 254 $187 $209 $239 $ 254 $187 $218 $187 $218 Fall2023/ S Jrina 2024 Fall20241 Serina 2025 Fall2025/ Serina 2026 1.5" 2" 2.5" 3" 1.5" 2" 2.5" 3" 1.5" 2" 2.5" 3" $161 $197 $161 $197 $161 $197 $171 $193 $171 $193 $171 $193 $179 $209 $179 $209 $179 $209 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $198 $219 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $239 $289 $239 $289 $239 $289 $215 $254 $215 $254 $215 $254 $153 $215 $153 $215 $153 $215 $203 $218 $269 344 $203 $218 $269 $ 344 $203 $218 $269 $344 $ 188 $ 235 $ 287 $188 $ 235 $ 287 $188 $ 235 $ 287 $ 188 $ 235 $ 287 $188 $ 235 $ 287 $188 $ 235 $ 287 $187 $209 $239 $187 $209 $239 $ 254 $187 $209 $239 $ 254 $187 $218 $187 $218 $187 $218 Exhibit APage 4 of 21 Exhibit APage 5 of 21 Exhibit APage 6 of 21 Exhibit APage 7 of 21 Exhibit APage 8 of 21 Exhibit APage 9 of 21 Exhibit APage 10 of 21 Exhibit A Page 11 of 21 Exhibit APage 12 of 21 Exhibit APage 13 of 21 Exhibit APage 14 of 21 Exhibit APage 15 of 21 Exhibit APage 16 of 21 Exhibit APage 17 of 21 Exhibit APage 18 of 21 Exhibit A Page 19 of 21 Exhibit A Page 20 of 21 Exhibit A Page 21 of 21 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1111 Joseph J. Schwab Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5464 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Robert Greenfield, Superintendent of Utility Services Cc: Timothy Watkins, Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Sewer Jetting Easement Machine Issue: The 2024 budget includes funding for a Sewer Jetting Easement Machine for the purpose of jetting sewer mains and manholes in rear yards. Analysis: The existing machine is a 1996 unit, has become unreliable, and it is hard to obtain replacement parts. This unit is a key component to the Sewer Division. There are many sanitary and storm sewers located in side and rear yards, and it is very difficult to jet clean these sewers with standard equipment. The proposed machine extends the reach of the Jetter trucks by another 600ft of hose. This will also reduce the possibility of an injury and/or damage to property from dragging the hose by hand and maintaining tension on it. This piece of equipment is a key component to Sewer Division and is needed for the maintenance of the City's sewer infrastructure. After reviewing the Sewer Equipment Company of America model, the options available and the City’s current equipment, the Sewer Equipment of America Model JAJ-600WH was chosen by crew members and staff to best fit the City’s needs. Brown Equipment Company is the sales distributor of this unit and is available through Sourcewell (formerly National Joint Powers Alliance), which is a cooperative purchasing entity for government and educational agencies of which the City is a member. Per Sourcewell Contract #101221-SCA, this equipment can be purchased in the amount of $94,985.59. Recommendation: We recommend the purchase of a Sewer Equipment of America Model JAJ- 600WH Sewer Jetting Easement Machine through Sourcewell Contract #101221-SCA, from Brown Equipment Company, 2501 S Kentucky Ave, Evansville, IN 47714, in the amount of $94,985.59. Source of funding will be the Equipment Replacement Fund account. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Contract # 101221-SCA Proposal Resolution R-241-23 Exhibit A – Resolution R-241-23 MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 11 CONSENT AGENDA #8. Attachment 1 Page 2 of 11 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 11 Sewer Equipment of America Sewer Jetting Easement Machine Model JAJ-600WH Attachment 1 Page 4 of 11 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 241 - 23 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE SEWER JETTING EASEMENT MACHINE FROM BROWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY THROUGH SOURCEWELL. WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City has appropriated funds in the Equipment Replacement Fund for use by the Public Works and Engineering Department during the 2024 fiscal year for the purchase of a sewer jetting easement machine; and WHEREAS, after a review of equipment options, City staff determined that the Sewer Equipment of America Model JAJ-600WH Sewer Jetting Easement Machine ("Equipment") satisfies the City’s specifications and will best address the City’s needs; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of Sourcewell, formerly the National Joint Powers Alliance ("Sourcewell"), a public agency that provides cooperative purchasing solutions for government and educational agencies, resulting in significant savings for the City; and WHEREAS, Sourcewell has identified Brown Equipment Company ("Vendor") as a qualified bidder and awarded Contract #101221-SCA ("Sourcewell Contract") to the Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that Sourcewell’s purchasing policies satisfy the City's competitive bidding requirements; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment in the not-to-exceed amount of $94,985.59 ("Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into the Agreement with Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment in accordance with the Sourcewell Contract in the not-to-exceed amount of $94,985.59; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. Page 5 of 11 2 SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT. The Agreement with Vendor for the purchase of the Equipment is approved in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and in a final form to be approved by the City Council. SECTION 3: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. The City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final Agreement. SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this ___ day of _________________, 2023. APPROVED this ___ day of ____________________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Approving Purchase of Jetter from Brown Equipment thru Sourcewell Page 6 of 11 CITY OF DES PLAINES CONTRACT FOR PRICING AND DELIVERY OF' SECA Easement Machine Model JAJ-600WH Full Name of Vendor SEC Enterprises, LLC dba Brown Equipment Principal Office Address 2501 S Kentucky Ave., Evansville, IN 47714 Local Office Address 16 20 S Schroeder Lane McHenry, IL 60050 Contact Person Dave Dorn TO: City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 Attention:Rob Greenfield Vendor warrants and represents that Vendor has reviewed and understood all domments included, referred to, or mentioned in this set of documents. 1.Contract to Deliver Products A.Contract and Products. The Vendor shall deliverto the City, at the Delivery Address, the products, items, materials, merchandise, supplies, or other items identified in this Contract (the "P,-oducts'? in new, undamaged, and first-quality condition. Vendor further shall: 1.Labor, Eaufoment.. Material s, and Supplies.P1·ovide, perform, and complete, in the mannerspecified and described in this Contract, all necessary work, labor, services, transportation,equipment, materials, supplies, information, data, and other means and items necessary todeliver the Products to the City in a pl'Oper and workmanlike manner; 2.Permits. Procure and furnish all permits, licenses, and other governmental approvals and authorizations necessary for the Products; Telephone Numbe1· 260-600-9358 However, the Vendor may propose to deliver a Product that is a different brand 01· model, if the Vendor provides written documentation establishing that the brand or model it proposes to deliver possess equal quality, dlll'ability, functionality. capability, and featu1·es as the Product specified. C.Responsibility for Damage or Loss. The Vendorshall be responsible and liable for, and shall p1·omptly and without charge to the City, repafr or 1·eplace, any damage done to, and any loss or injury suffered by, the City as a result of the Vendor's failure to perform hereunder. D.lnspectionl'Cesting/Reiection. The City shall have the right to inspect all or any part of the Products. If, in the City's judgment .. all or any part of the Product!! is defective 01· damaged or fails to confo1·m strictly to the requirements of this Contract, then the City, without limiting its other rights or remedies, may, at it11 discretion: (i) reject such P1·oducts; (ii) require Biddl'r to conect 01· 1·eplacc such Products at Bidder's cost; (iii) obtain new P1·oducts to l'eplace the Products that a1·e defective, damaged, or nonconforming and charge Bidder with any excess cost incurred thereby; and/or (iv) cancel all or any part of any 01·der or this Contract. Products so 3.Bonda and Insurance. Procure and fumish all rejected may be returned or held at Bidder's expense and bonds and all insurance certificates and p olicies/ risk. of insurance, if any, specified in this Contract; I'/ '1 /_ J � 2. Pricing4.Taxes. Pay all applicable federal, state, andlocal taxes; and The Vendor shall deliver the Products to the City in accordance with the following price11: 5.Miscellaneous. Do all other things required ofBidder by this Contract. B.Performance Standards. The Vendor agrees thatthe Products will comply strictly with the Specifications attached hereto and by this reference made a pal't of this Contract. If this Contract specifies a Product by brand name or model, that specification is i1ltended to reflect the required performance standards and standard of excellence that the City requil'es for thP Product. 1 Product It.cm No. Scwur l•:i-1uipment of America &!WIJl' ,JettinK l•:aMttmunt Machine Dc11Cription Quantity Unit Price of Product of Product of Product Modol ,JA,J. I (One) $94,085.59 GOOWH Exhibit A Page 7 of 11 Exhibit A Page 8 of 11 Exhibit A Page 9 of 11 Exhibit A Page 10 of 11 Exhibit A Page 11 of 11 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: December 7, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Ryan N. Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: The Lakota Group – Oakton Street Action Plan – Professional Service Agreement Issue: The City is seeking the creation of an action plan for the Oakton Street corridor that would include a community outreach component and convert concepts from recent plans and studies into actionable steps. Analysis: Revitalization of the Oakton Street corridor is addressed in the City’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan and 2022-2026 Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan’s Goal 2: Reimagined Growth, specifies Oakton corridor improvements by leveraging the TIF district and pursuing a new train station. Recent studies of the area have included the 2019 Metra Station Feasibility Study, which was prepared by AECOM in association with The Lakota Group, and the 2023 Developer Discussion Panel Report. The latter report was produced with a Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) grant in conjunction with assistance from the Urban Land Institute (ULI), producing a report focused on transit-orient development (TOD). The studies and plans provide a background against which The Lakota Group would create an Oakton Street Action Plan. Key deliverables would include: •Creation of an updated site review and community engagement plan. •Facilitation of community workshops and stakeholder discussions. •Completion of a State of the Oakton Street Corridor report. •Development of a concept design package. •Creation and refinement of an action plan and an implementation matrix. The City would expect The Lakota Group to provide recommendations for streetscaping and beautification, on-street parking, and land use. Funding for this project would be from TIF 8 tax increment. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the professional services agreement with The Lakota Group in an amount not to exceed $38,240 for the term of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, or until the completion of all three phases of the project. Resolution R-244-23 Exhibit A: Professional Services Agreement MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 63 CONSENT AGENDA #9. {00125816.2} 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 244 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LAKOTA GROUP FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN._________________________ WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Community and Economic Development Department requested proposals for consulting services related to the creation an Oakton Street Action Plan (“Services”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 10 of Title 1 of the City Code of the City of Des Plaines and the City’s purchasing policy, the City Council has determined that the procurement of the Services does not require competitive bidding because the Services require a high degree of professional skill where the ability or fitness of the individual plays an important part; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the proposal submitted by The Lakota Group ("Consultant”) is the most appropriate for the provision of the Services to the City; and WHEREAS, Consultant has satisfactorily performed services for the City in the past; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a one-year agreement with Consultant for the provision of the Services in the not-to-exceed amount of $38,240 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into the Agreement with Consultant for the Services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT. The Agreement with Consultant for the Services in an amount not to exceed $38,240.00 is hereby approved in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A, and in a final form approved by the General Counsel. SECTION 3: EXECUTION. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager and City Clerk to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the final Agreement only after receipt by the City Clerk of at least two executed copies of the Agreement from Consultant; provided, however, that if the City Clerk does not receive such executed copies of the Agreement from Consultant within 60 days after the date of adoption of this Resolution, then this authority to execute and seal the Agreement shall, at the option of the City Council, be null and void. Page 2 of 63 {00125816.2} 2 SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 3 of 63 CITY OF DES PLAINES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of the ____ day of ___________, 2023 (“Agreement”) and is by and between the CITY OF DES PLAINES, an Illinois home rule municipal corporation (“City”) and the Consultant identified in Subsection 1A below. IN CONSIDERATION OF the recitals and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in the Agreement, and pursuant to the City’s statutory and home rule powers, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. CONSULTANT. A.Engagement of Consultant. The City desires to engage the Consultant identified below to provide all necessary professional consulting services and to perform the work in connection with the project identified below: The Lakota Group (“Consultant”) One East Wacker, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 467-5445 Email: kclark@thelakotagroup.com B.Project Description. Coordinate meetings and facilitate community workshops; conduct an updated site review; create a community engagement plan; conduct stakeholder discussions; create a State of the Oakton Street Corridor report; develop a concept design package; create and refine an action plan and an implementation matrix; participate in meetings with staff; support for presentations to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council (collectively, “Services”). C.Representations of Consultant. The Consultant has submitted to the City a Request for Proposal Response with a Work Scope that further describes the services to be provided by the Consultant, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement (“Scope of Services”). The Consultant represents that it is financially solvent, has the necessary financial resources, and is sufficiently experienced and competent to perform and complete the professional consulting services set forth in Exhibit A in a manner consistent with the standards of professional practice by recognized consulting firms providing services of a similar nature. D.Agreement Amount. The total amount billed by the Consultant for the Services under this Agreement shall not exceed $38,240, at the unit prices outlined in Scope of Services, including reimbursable expenses as identified in the Scope of Work, unless amended pursuant to Subsection 8A of this Agreement. SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. A.Retention of the Consultant. The City retains the Consultant to perform, and the Consultant agrees to perform, the Services. B.Services. The Consultant shall provide the Services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Exhibit A Page 4 of 63 C. Commencement; Time of Performance. The Consultant shall commence the Services on January 1, 2024 upon receipt of written notice from the City that this Agreement has been fully executed by the Parties (the “Commencement Date”). The Consultant shall diligently and continuously prosecute the Services until December 31, 2024 or until all three phases of the Scope of Work have been completed to the satisfaction of the City (“Time of Performance”). D. Reporting. The Consultant shall regularly report to the City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, regarding the progress of the Services during the term of this Agreement. The City Manager’s designee shall be the person identified in Section 8.D to receive notice, unless the City Manager otherwise designates in writing. SECTION 3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. A. Agreement Amount. The total amount billed for the Proposal and paid by the City during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed the amount identified as the Agreement Amount in Subsection 1D of this Agreement, without the prior express written authorization of the City. B. Invoices and Payment. The Consultant shall be paid as provided in Exhibit A. The Consultant shall submit invoices to the City in an approved format for those portions of the Services performed and completed by the Consultant. The amount billed in any such invoice shall be based on the method of payment set forth in the Scope of Services. The City shall pay to the Consultant the amount billed in accordance with the Illinois Local Government Prompt Payment Act, 50 ILCS 505/1 et seq. C. Records. The Consultant shall maintain records showing actual time devoted and costs incurred, and shall permit the City or its authorized representative to inspect and audit all data and records of the Consultant for work done under the Agreement. The records shall be made available to the City at reasonable times during the Agreement period, and for three years after the termination of the Agreement. D. Claim in Addition to Agreement Amount. If the Consultant wishes to make a claim for additional compensation as a result of action taken by the City, the Consultant shall provide written notice to the City of such claim within 7 days after occurrence of such action as provided by Subsection 8D of this Agreement, and no claim for additional compensation shall be valid unless made in accordance with this Subsection. Any changes in the Agreement Amount shall be valid only upon written amendment pursuant to Subsection 8A of this Agreement. Regardless of the decision of the City relative to a claim submitted by the Consultant, the Consultant shall proceed with all of the work required to complete the Services under this Agreement as determined by the City without interruption. E. Taxes, Benefits and Royalties. The Agreement Amount includes all applicable federal, state, and local taxes of every kind and nature applicable to the Services as well as all taxes, contributions, and premiums for unemployment insurance, old age or retirement benefits, pensions, annuities, or similar benefits and all costs, royalties and fees arising from the use on, or the incorporation into, the Services, of patented or copyrighted equipment, materials, supplies, tools, appliances, devices, processes, or inventions. All claim or right to claim additional compensation by reason of the payment of any such tax, contribution, premium, costs, royalties, or fees is hereby waived and released by Consultant. Exhibit A Page 5 of 63 F. Final Acceptance. The Services, or, if the Services are to be performed in separate phases, each phase of the Services, shall be considered complete on the date of final written acceptance by the City of the Services or each phase of the Services, as the case may be, which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. SECTION 4. PERSONNEL; SUBCONTRACTORS. A. Key Project Personnel. The Key Project Personnel identified in Exhibit A, or otherwise provided by the Consultant, shall be primarily responsible for carrying out the Services on behalf of the Consultant. Consultant shall notify the City as soon as practicable following resignation or termination of Key Project Personnel. No new Key Project Personnel shall be reassigned or added without the City’s prior written approval. B. Availability of Personnel. The Consultant shall provide all personnel necessary to complete the Services including, without limitation, any Key Project Personnel identified in this Agreement. The Consultant shall notify the City as soon as practicable prior to terminating the employment of, reassigning, or receiving notice of the resignation of, any Key Project Personnel. The Consultant shall have no claim for damages and shall not bill the City for additional time and materials charges as the result of any portion of the Services which must be duplicated or redone due to such termination or for any delay or extension of the Time of Performance as a result of any such termination, reassigning, or resignation. C. Approval and Use of Subcontractors. The Consultant shall perform the Services with its own personnel and under the management, supervision, and control of its own organization unless otherwise approved by the City in writing. All subcontractors and subcontracts used by the Consultant shall be acceptable to, and approved in advance by, the City. The City’s approval of any subcontractor or subcontract shall not relieve the Consultant of full responsibility and liability for the provision, performance, and completion of the Services as required by the Agreement. All Services performed under any subcontract shall be subject to all of the provisions of this Agreement in the same manner as if performed by employees of the Consultant. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Consultant” shall be deemed also to refer to all subcontractors of the Consultant, and every subcontract shall include a provision binding the subcontractor to all provisions of this Agreement. D. Removal of Personnel and Subcontractors. If any personnel or subcontractor fails to perform the Services in a manner satisfactory to the City, the Consultant shall immediately upon notice from the City remove and replace such personnel or subcontractor. The Consultant shall have no claim for damages, for compensation in excess of the amount contained in this Agreement or for a delay or extension of the Time of Performance as a result of any such removal or replacement. SECTION 5. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. A. Confidential Information. The term “Confidential Information” shall mean information in the possession or under the control of the City relating to the technical, business or corporate affairs of the City; City property; user information, including, without limitation, any information pertaining to usage of the City's computer system, including and without limitation, any information obtained from server logs or other records of electronic or machine readable form; and the existence of, and terms and conditions of, this Agreement. City Confidential Information shall not include information that can be demonstrated: (i) to have been rightfully in the possession of the Consultant from a source other than the City prior to the time of disclosure of Exhibit A Page 6 of 63 said information to the Consultant under this Agreement (“Time of Disclosure”); (ii) to have been in the public domain prior to the Time of Disclosure; (iii) to have become part of the public domain after the Time of Disclosure by a publication or by any other means except an unauthorized act or omission or breach of this Agreement on the part of the Consultant or the City; or (iv) to have been supplied to the Consultant after the Time of Disclosure without restriction by a third party who is under no obligation to the City to maintain such information in confidence. B. No Disclosure of Confidential Information by the Consultant. The Consultant acknowledges that it shall, in performing the Services for the City under this Agreement, have access to or be directly or indirectly exposed to Confidential Information. The Consultant shall hold confidential all Confidential Information and shall not disclose or use such Confidential Information without express prior written consent of the City. The Consultant shall use reasonable measures at least as strict as those the Consultant uses to protect its own confidential information. Such measures shall include, without limitation, requiring employees and subcontractors of the Consultant to execute a non-disclosure agreement before obtaining access to Confidential Information. SECTION 6. STANDARD OF CARE; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE. A. Standard of Care for Services. The Consultant represents and certifies that the Services shall be performed in accordance with the highest standards of professional practice, care, and diligence practiced by recognized consulting firms in performing services of a similar nature in existence at the Time of Performance. The representations and certifications expressed shall be in addition to any other representations and certifications expressed in this Agreement, or expressed or implied by law, which are hereby reserved unto the City. B. Indemnification. The Consultant shall, without regard to the availability or unavailability of any insurance, either of the City or the Consultant, indemnify, save harmless, and defend the City, and its officials, employees, agents, and attorneys against any and all lawsuits, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and administrative expenses, that arise, or may be alleged to have arisen, out of or in connection with, the Consultant’s performance of, or failure to perform, the Services or any part thereof, or any failure to meet the representations and certifications pursuant to Subsection 6.A of this Agreement (but not the performance or failure of a contractor not retained by Consultant), whether or not due or claimed to be due in whole or in part to the active, passive, or concurrent negligence or fault of the Consultant, except to the extent caused by the sole negligence of the City. C. Insurance. Contemporaneous with the Consultant’s execution of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide certificates and policies of insurance, all with coverages and limits acceptable to the City, and evidencing at least the minimum insurance coverages and limits as set forth in Exhibit B to this Agreement. For good cause shown, the City Manager may extend the time for submission of the required policies of insurance upon such terms, and with such assurances of complete and prompt performance, as the City Manager may impose in the exercise of his sole discretion. Such certificates and policies shall be in a form acceptable to the City and from companies with a general rating of A minus, and a financial size category of Class X or better, in Best's Insurance Guide. Such insurance policies shall provide that no change, modification in, or cancellation of, any insurance shall become effective until the expiration of 30 days after written notice thereof shall have been given by the insurance company to the City. The Consultant shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, maintain and keep in force, at the Consultant’s expense, the insurance coverages provided above, including, without limitation, at Exhibit A Page 7 of 63 all times while correcting any failure to meet the warranty requirements of Subsection 6A, Warranty of Services, of this Agreement. D. No Personal Liability. No elected or appointed official, or employee of the City shall be personally liable, in law or in contract, to the Consultant as the result of the execution of this Agreement. SECTION 7. CONSULTANT AGREEMENT GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Relationship of the Parties. The Consultant shall act as an independent contractor in providing and performing the Services. Nothing in, nor done pursuant to, this Agreement shall be construed (i) to create the relationship of principal and agent, employer and employee, partners, or joint venturers between the City and Consultant; or (ii) to create any relationship between the City and any subcontractor of the Consultant. B. Conflict of Interest. The Consultant represents and certifies that, to the best of its knowledge, (1) no elected or appointed City official, employee or agent is interested in the business of the Consultant or in this Agreement, or has personally received payment or other consideration for this Agreement; (2) as of the date of this Agreement neither the Consultant nor any person employed or associated with the Consultant has any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the obligations under this Agreement; and (3) neither the Consultant nor any person employed by or associated with the Consultant shall at any time during the term of this Agreement obtain or acquire any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the obligations under this Agreement. C. No Collusion. The Consultant represents and certifies that the Consultant is not barred from contracting with a unit of state or local government as a result of (i) a delinquency in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue unless the Consultant is contesting, in accordance with the procedures established by the appropriate revenue act, its liability for the tax or the amount of the tax, as set forth in Section 11-42.1-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-42.1-1 et seq.; or (ii) a violation of either Section 33E-3 or Section 33E-4 of Article 33E of the Criminal Code of 1961, 720 ILCS 5/33E-1 et seq. The Consultant represents that the only persons, firms, or corporations interested in this Agreement as principals are those disclosed to the City prior to the execution of this Agreement, and that this Agreement is made without collusion with any other person, firm, or corporation. If at any time it shall be found that the Consultant has, in procuring this Agreement, colluded with any other person, firm, or corporation, then the Consultant shall be liable to the City for all loss or damage that the City may suffer, and this Agreement shall, at the City’s option, be null and void. D. Sexual Harassment Policy. The Consultant certifies that it has a written sexual harassment policy in full compliance with Section 2-105(A)(4) of the Illinois Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/2-105(A)(4). E. Patriot Act Compliance. The Consultant represents and warrants to the City that neither it nor any of its principals, shareholders, members, partners, or affiliates, as applicable, is a person or entity named as a Specially Designated National and Blocked Person (as defined in Presidential Executive Order 13224) and that it is not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of a Specially Designated National and Blocked Person. The Consultant further represents and warrants to the City that the Consultant and its principals, shareholders, members, partners, or affiliates, as applicable, are not, directly or indirectly, engaged in, and are not facilitating, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement on behalf of any person or entity named as a Exhibit A Page 8 of 63 Specially Designated National and Blocked Person. The Consultant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its corporate authorities, and all City elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, engineers, and attorneys, from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the representations and warranties in this subsection. F. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, the City may terminate this Agreement at any time upon 15 days prior written notice to the Consultant. In the event that this Agreement is so terminated, the Consultant shall be paid for Services actually performed and reimbursable expenses actually incurred or reasonable expenses that Consultant is legally obligated to pay, if any, prior to termination, not exceeding the value of the Services completed as determined as provided in Exhibit A. G. Term. The Time of Performance of this Agreement, unless terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, shall expire on the date the City Manager determines that all of the Services under this Agreement, including warranty services, are completed. A determination of completion shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or claims which the City may have or thereafter acquire with respect to any breach hereof by the Consultant or any right of indemnification of the City by the Consultant. H. Compliance with Laws and Grants. Consultant shall give all notices, pay all fees, and take all other action that may be necessary to ensure that the Services are provided, performed, and completed in accordance with all required governmental permits, licenses, or other approvals and authorizations that may be required in connection with providing, performing, and completing the Services, and with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations, including without limitation the Fair Labor Standards Act; any statutes regarding qualification to do business; any statutes prohibiting discrimination because of, or requiring affirmative action based on, race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, or other prohibited classification, including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the Illinois Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. Consultant shall also comply with all conditions of any federal, state, or local grant received by Owner or Consultant with respect to this Contract or the Services. Consultant shall be solely liable for any fines or civil penalties that are imposed by any governmental or quasi-governmental agency or body that may arise, or be alleged to have arisen, out of or in connection with Consultant’s, or its subcontractors’, performance of, or failure to perform, the Services or any part thereof. Every provision of law required by law to be inserted into this Contract shall be deemed to be inserted herein. I. Default. If it should appear at any time that the Consultant has failed or refused to prosecute, or has delayed in the prosecution of, the Services with diligence at a rate that assures completion of the Services in full compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, or has otherwise failed, refused, or delayed to perform or satisfy the Services or any other requirement of this Agreement (“Event of Default”), and fails to cure any such Event of Default within ten business days after the Consultant’s receipt of written notice of such Event of Default from the City, then the City shall have the right, without prejudice to any other remedies provided by law or equity, to pursue any one or more of the following remedies: Exhibit A Page 9 of 63 1. Cure by Consultant. The City may require the Consultant, within a reasonable time, to complete or correct all or any part of the Services that are the subject of the Event of Default; and to take any or all other action necessary to bring the Consultant and the Services into compliance with this Agreement. 2. Termination of Agreement by City. The City may terminate this Agreement without liability for further payment of amounts due or to become due under this Agreement. 3. Withholding of Payment by City. The City may withhold from any payment, whether or not previously approved, or may recover from the Consultant, any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees and administrative expenses, incurred by the City as the result of any Event of Default by the Consultant or as a result of actions taken by the City in response to any Event of Default by the Consultant. J. No Additional Obligation. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the City is under no obligation under this Agreement or otherwise to negotiate or enter into any other or additional contracts or agreements with the Consultant, or with any vendor solicited or recommended by the Consultant. K. City Council Authority. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, any negotiations or agreements with, or representations by the Consultant to vendors shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. The City shall not be liable to any vendor or other third party for any agreements made by the Consultant, purportedly on behalf of the City, without the knowledge and approval of the City Council. L. Mutual Cooperation. The City agrees to cooperate with the Consultant in the performance of the Services, including meeting with the Consultant and providing the Consultant with such non-confidential information that the City may have that may be relevant and helpful to the Consultant’s performance of the Services. The Consultant agrees to cooperate with the City in the performance of the Services to complete the Work and with any other consultants engaged by the City. M. News Releases. The Consultant shall not issue any news releases or other public statements regarding the Services without prior written approval from the City Manager. N. Ownership. Designs, drawings, plans, specifications, photos, reports, information, observations, calculations, notes, and any other documents, data, or information, in any form, prepared, collected, or received by the Consultant in connection with any or all of the Services to be performed under this Agreement (“Documents”) shall be and remain the exclusive property of the City. At the City’s request, or upon termination of this Agreement, the Consultant shall cause the Documents to be promptly delivered to the City. O. City Data. The City has developed various types of data and information, such as digital map information through Geographic Information Systems Technology and through Auto CAD and other methods (collectively “City Data”) concerning the real property located within the City. If requested to do so by the Consultant, the City agrees to supply the Consultant with a digital copy of the City Data, subject to the following conditions: 1. Limited Access to City Data. The City Data provided by the City shall be limited to the scope of the Work that the Consultant is to provide for the City; Exhibit A Page 10 of 63 2. Purpose of City Data. The Consultant shall limit its use of the City Data to its intended purpose of furtherance of the Work; and 3. Agreement with Respect to City Data. The Consultant does hereby acknowledge and agree that: a. Trade Secrets of the City. The City Data constitutes proprietary materials and trade secrets of the City and, shall remain the property of the City; b. Consent of City Required. The Consultant will not provide or make available the City Data in any form to anyone without the prior written consent of the City Manager; c. Supply to City. At the request of the City, the Consultant shall supply the City with any and all information that may have been developed by the Consultant based on the City Data; d. No Guarantee of Accuracy. The City makes no guarantee as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the City Data in regard to the Consultant’s intended use thereof; and e. Discontinuation of Use. At such time as the Services have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the Consultant shall cease its use of the City Data for any purpose whatsoever; and, upon request, an authorized representative of the City shall be afforded sufficient access to the Consultant’s premises and data processing equipment to verify that all use of the City Data has been discontinued. P. Non-Solicitation of Employees. In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, including the understanding that the Consultant will be providing the City with consultants specially-trained by the Consultant and who will utilize the Consultant’s confidential information and trade secrets, and in recognition that the services to be rendered to the City by the Consultant are of a special and unique character, the City covenants, warrants and agrees that during the period of time that any individual employee of the Consultant provides consultation to the City and for a period of one (1) year following the last day in which any such employee provides such consulting services for the City, the City shall not, either directly or indirectly, without the prior written consent of the Consultant, solicit, induce or otherwise offer employment to, or engage in discussions regarding employment with, any such Consultant employee, or assist any third party with respect to any of these actions, unless that Consultant employee has been separated from his or her employment or other relationship with the Consultant for a period of six (6) consecutive months. SECTION 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Amendment. No amendment or modification to this Agreement shall be effective unless and until such amendment or modification is in writing, properly approved in accordance with applicable procedures, and executed. B. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by the City or by the Consultant without the prior written consent of the other party. Exhibit A Page 11 of 63 C. Binding Effect. The terms of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their agents, successors, and assigns. D. Notice. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered (i) personally, (ii) by a reputable overnight courier, (iii) by certified mail, return receipt requested, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, (iv) by facsimile, or (v) by electronic internet mail (“e-mail”). Facsimile notices shall be deemed valid only to the extent that they are (a) actually received by the individual to whom addressed and (b) followed by delivery of actual notice in the manner described in either (i), (ii), or (iii) above within three business days thereafter at the appropriate address set forth below. E- mail notices shall be deemed valid and received by the addressee thereof when delivered by e- mail and (a) opened by the recipient on a business day at the address set forth below, and (b) followed by delivery of actual notice in the manner described in either (i), (ii) or (iii) above within three business days thereafter at the appropriate address set forth below. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, notices shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (a) actual receipt; (b) one business day after deposit with an overnight courier as evidenced by a receipt of deposit; or (c) three business days following deposit in the U.S. mail, as evidenced by a return receipt. By notice complying with the requirements of this Subsection, each Party shall have the right to change the address or the addressee, or both, for all future notices and communications to such party, but no notice of a change of addressee or address shall be effective until actually received. Notices and communications to the City shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following address: City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, Illinois 60018 Attention: Michael Bartholomew, City Manager E-mail: mbartholomew@desplaines.org With a copy to: Elrod Friedman LLP 325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 450 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Attention: Brooke Lenneman E-mail: brooke.lenneman@elrodfriedman.com Notices and communications to the Consultant shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following address: The Lakota Group One East Wacker, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 Attention: Kevin Clark Telephone: (312) 467-5445 Email: kclark@thelakotagroup.com E. Third Party Beneficiary. No claim as a third party beneficiary under this Agreement by any person, firm, or corporation other than the Consultant shall be made or be valid against the City. Exhibit A Page 12 of 63 F. Provisions Severable. If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated. G. Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. H. Governing Laws. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the internal laws, but not the conflict of laws rules, of the State of Illinois. I. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all previous or contemporaneous oral or written agreements and negotiations between the City and the Consultant with respect to the Proposal and the Services. J. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to or constitute a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement (whether or not similar) nor shall any such waiver be deemed to or constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. K. Consents. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, whenever the consent, permission, authorization, approval, acknowledgement, or similar indication of assent of any party to this Agreement, or of any duly authorized officer, employee, agent, or representative of any party to this Agreement, is required in this Agreement, the consent, permission, authorization, approval, acknowledgement, or similar indication of assent shall be in writing. L. Grammatical Usage and Construction. In construing this Agreement, pronouns include all genders and the plural includes the singular and vice versa. M. Headings. The headings, titles, and captions in this Agreement have been inserted only for convenience and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement. N. Exhibits. Exhibits A and B are attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the Exhibit and the text of this Agreement, the text of this Agreement shall control. O. Rights Cumulative. Unless expressly provided to the contrary in this Agreement, each and every one of the rights, remedies, and benefits provided by this Agreement shall be cumulative and shall not be exclusive of any other such rights, remedies, and benefits allowed by law. P. Counterpart Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which, when executed, shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] Exhibit A Page 13 of 63 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement this ______ day of ________________, 2023. ATTEST: CITY OF DES PLAINES By: By: City Clerk City Manager ATTEST: CONSULTANT By: By: Title: Its: Exhibit A Page 14 of 63 Exhibit A to Public Services Agreement The Lakota Group Scope of Services Exhibit A Page 15 of 63 Request for Proposal Response • November 29, 2023 OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN CITY OF DES PLAINES Exhibit A Page 16 of 63 OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN CITY OF DES PLAINES THE LAKOTA GROUP One East Wacker, Suite 2700| Chicago, Illinois 60601 Contact: Kevin Clark, PLA, AICP, Principal/Director of Design E: kclark@thelakotagroup.com P: (312) 467-5445 x 206 Exhibit A Page 17 of 63 Table of Contents Delve In » Our Approach 1 Project Understanding 2 Work Scope 3 Our Work 6 Related Projects + References 7 Our Team 33 Lakota Firm Overview 34 Lakota Resumes 46 Our Costs 42 Budget 43 Exhibit A Page 18 of 63 Exhibit A Page 19 of 63 1CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN 1. Our Approach Exhibit A Page 20 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 2 Project Understanding » The Lakota Group is pleased to provide this professional Planning and Urban Design Consulting Service proposal to assist the City of Des Plaines with developing an action plan for Oakton Street within the TIF 8 boundaries. As part of this process, our team will test redevelopement scenarios for key oppotunitiy sites and develop conceptual streetscape and public space designs and visualizations for key focus areas. We understand that there is significant desire by City leaders and staff to futher advance preliminary recommendations made by the Urban Land Institute/ Regional Transportaiton Developer panel. As such, this action plan will identify target locations to enhance the corridor’s physical appearance, placemaking, programming, and economic development potential. Focus or Target Areas Focus or Target Areas of this assignment have been identified as noted below. We understand additional locations my be identified during this process. »“K-Mart” site »Oaks Shopping Center »Oakton Street/study area streetscape »Area identifiers/gateways/signage »Physical improvements to the station area and study area properties The concepts may include, but are not limited to, the following potential improvements: »Street trees and landscaping »Street, sidewalk, and hardscape paving solutions »Pedestrian access and traffic calming solutions »Gateways and wayfinding signage »New lighting solutions (pedestrian, vehicular, specialty) »Parking reconfiguration/modifications to address new commuter patterns »Street furniture and specialty elements »Public art locations/installations »Parking lot and vehicular use area screening/buffers/fences »Plazas, pocket parks, or other public open space, gathering, and placemaking ideas Exhibit A Page 21 of 63 3CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Task 1.1: Project Start Meeting Conduct a project start meeting with City staff to discuss: »Planning Mission/Area History »TIF 8 Boundaries and Study Area »ULI/RTA Developer Panel Recommendations »Project Goals »Area Context Strengths/Weaknesses »Work Plan and Schedule »Available Data, Resources, and Resource People »Identification of Key Stakeholders »Community Engagement Plan Task 1.2: Site Review/Fieldwork Conduct an updated and focused site specific review of the overall downtown study area, street character, and land use context. Photo-document existing conditions, including street furniture, curb cuts, crosswalks, pavement, utilities, and adjacent building conditions and character. TASK 1.3: Community Engagement Plan Following guidance from City staff, our team will craft a plan to reach residents, business owners, and local leaders throughout the planning process. Suggested contacts will be used as a starting point, with additional outreach conducted to identify a broad but relevant group of individuals. The engagement plan will include metrics established in the kick- off meeting to ensure that, throughout the process, the team is meeting the engagement goals defined early on. TASK 1.4: Key Stakeholder Discussions/Focus Groups Conduct discussions with key stakeholders in the corridor to understand potential sites’ history, goals, and potential future plans. Stakeholders may include property owners, business owners, local developers, and community leaders. TASK 1.5: Corridor Land Use and Physical Analysis Our team will evaluate existing and proposed land-use mix, current zoning and development standards and patterns, building locations/massing/conditions, multimodal access and circulation, parking, open space, physical conditions, streetscape/facade improvement and adaptive use potential candidates, wayfinding/signage conditions, proposed developments, sustainability, and other related information. A series of maps and diagrams will be developed, highlighting the study area’s opporutunities and constraints. TASK 1.6: Community Workshop #1 Our team will host and facilitate a community workshop. This event will provide a casual “Stations-Style” format where we can discuss topics with stakeholders related to the study area such as market/programming opportunities, physical conditions, placemaking, branding & wayfinding, and urban design. Exhibits will be prepared based on quantitative and qualitative information collected and will be presented at these stations to guide discussions and engage the community. All exhibits from the community workshop will be uploaded to the project website to be accessible to the community at large. TASK 1.7: State of the Oakton Street Corridor We will summarize the findings of the Engage + Discover phase, including the input gathered from local stakeholders, into a concise, highly-visual State of the Oakton Street Corridor report. We will review this document with the City staff and refine before moving into the Envision + Explore phase. TASK 1.8: City Staff Meeting After submitting a draft State of the Oakton Street Corridor, our team will meet with City staff to present the planning process and summarize findings of the first phase. During this meeting, City staff will provide feedback on the report, which will guide our team to refine and finalize as needed. Work Scope » Phase 1: Engage + Discover Exhibit A Page 22 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 4 Task 2.1 Concept Design Package Develop a range of site plan scenarios and urban design solutions based on issues and opportunities identified in the first phase. The initial package will include three (3) site plans for up to three (3) key sites to be determined in the process along with supporting data, as well as Existing Conditions Plans. In addition, a range of urban design concepts will be developed These concepts may include, but are not limited to: »Public-Way enhancements/streetscape improvements »Urban form improvements (Bulk standard and zoning impacts) »Façade improvements and adaptive use potential »Potential parking enhancements/strategies »Pedestrian/bicycle safety and circulation enhancements »Gateway, signage, and wayfinding solutions »Programming and event concepts »Hardscape Paving Materials Layouts/Transitions and accessibility needs (Vehicular/Pedestrian) »Schematic designs of anticipated pedestrian and vehicular movements, including proposed changes to parking lots »Streetscape Furniture Options »Planters and Planting Areas »Street or Pedestrian Lighting »Crosswalks and Traffic Calming Features »Special Lighting Features or Opportunities »Screening Elements »Public Art/Sculpture Locations »Expanded outdoor dining areas Lakota is known for its “Min-Mid-Max” approach, which involves testing and evaluating multiple tiers of concepts and creative urban design components for key target sites or areas to help community stakeholders and leaders visualize the physical impact, character, and context of potential planning and design solutions. Concepts and solutions will be prepared using a combination of plan drawings, photo-simulations (before and after) and 3-D models to illustrate conceptual designs. Task 2.2: City Staff Review Meeting Present the Concept Design Package to City staff for feedback. The concept plans will be refined based on input from staff. This will help guide the development of the plan and refinement of ideas, as necessary, prior to hosting the second community workshop. Task 2.3: Community Workshop #2 Our team will conduct a second community workshop to present and discuss design alternatives and planning concepts and solutions for the study area. This format will be an interactive “stations-style” setting and will allow stakeholders to review ideas and concepts Multiple activities and exercises will be provided for participants to engage, such as design elements, built environment improvements, target sites enhancements, and transportation/ mobility enhancements, among others. Task 2.4: Options Tool Kit Following input from the community and City staff, our team will refine alternative concepts to preferred concept(s) and ideas, summarized in a concise, graphic report which builds on the State of Grand Avenue report. We will also identify additional public communication tools or exhibits necessary to disseminate planning goals. This tool kit for outreach may include additional renderings, exhibits, plans, charts, and/or comparative analyses. Task 2.5: Refined Concepts + 3D Renderings Revise each plan concept based on feedback from City staff and community stakeholders and prepare refined, rendered site plans and associated data for each. In addition, create a rendered 3D birds-eye perspective for each concept to depict massing, urban design, placemaking, and character within the context of the neighborhood. A preferred view will be determined in coordination with City staff. Task 2.6: City Staff Review Finishing off the Explore + Envision phase of the planning process, our team will engage City staff in a preferred concept(s) presentation and review the Options Tool Kit, gathering additional input. Additional refinement to the preferred concept(s) will be addressed as necessary. Phase 2: Envision + Explore Exhibit A Page 23 of 63 5CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Task 3.1: Action Plan and Implementation Strategies Our team will refine the plan components and strategies by addressing needed flexibility through a series of plans/tools. These include but are not limited to: »Physical streetscape and open space enhancements »Facade and storefront design approach and incentive programs »Adaptive use candidates and financing strategies »Zoning standard refinements »Urban form (Bulk/Massing standards and transition zones) »Mobility enhancements »Public space programming and events »Area signage and wayfinding »Funding opportunities Our team will facilitate a priorities discussion and begin building an action plan consisting of implementation strategies and plan initiatives. Task 3.2: City Staff Meeting Our team will meet with City staff to discuss the draft final plan, implementation strategies, and preliminary narrative. Feedback from staff will help identify areas for further clarification and articulation. Our team will provide necessary supporting exhibits, along with refined budgets and costs for the different plan components. Task 3.3: Implementation Matrix Refinement We will refine the plan and implementation matrix. A meeting with City staff will confirm appropriate partner agencies and explore potential funding strategies for plan recommendations. Task 3.4: Plan Commission/City Council Presentation Following the Plan Commission/City Council presentation and feedback session, we will finalize the Plan and distribute electronic and hard copies to the City. Phase 3: Implement Exhibit A Page 24 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 6 2. Our Work Exhibit A Page 25 of 63 116 West Illinois Street Floor 7 Chicago, Illinois 60654 p 312.467.5445 f 312.467.5484 thelakotagroup.com Lakota was part of a team, including Christopher B. Burke Engineering and SPACECO hired by the City of Des Plaines to develop a streetscape master plan for the downtown. The goal of the master plan was to create a unique and walkable environment that would support the existing mixed-use transit oriented downtown. The design, which is being implemented in phases, includes granite paver banding with clay paver inlays, expanded outdoor cafe areas, benches, bike racks, movable planters, additional planted beds and medians, street trees, and masonry seatwalls and gateway monuments to create a distinctive identity for the area. To date phases one and two have been successfully completed. The project team’s implementation of the streetscape is ongoing with phase three currently under construction and phase four designs underway. Downtown Des Plaines Streetscape Master Plan Des Plaines, IL Reference Start Date: February 2012 Completed: Ongoing Jon Duddles, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works and Engineering City of Des Plaines (847) 391-6127 jduddles@desplaines.org Planning Urban Design Landscape Architecture Historic Preservation Community Engagement Statistics Exhibit A Page 26 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 8 Lakota developed plans to open Marion Street to two-way traffic in order to revitalize the deteriorated pedestrian mall in the center of Historic Downtown Oak Park. The overall plan links the mall to another new, pedestrian-friendly street that has several local businesses. The streetscape design focused on rejuvenating this well-known commercial center with a rich variety of materials and flexible outdoor gathering spaces. The design included natural stone, brick street/sidewalk paving, custom site furnishings, a central water feature, new plantings, and custom lighting. Sustainable design techniques, such as an under-sidewalk heat mat and a gray water storage system for irrigation, were used. The project has been integral to creating an active and vibrant commercial district, and has spurred additional streetscape enhancements and economic development within the downtown. Following the success of North Marion Street, the Village of Oak Park engaged The Lakota Group to develop streetscape designs, plans, and construction documents for South Marion. While the material palette was mostly defined, there were unique challenges and goals associated with this new phase. Wider street widths prompted the use of additional overhead roadway lights. An increased focus on Complete Streets led to subtle modifications to cross-walks and alley crossings. The area as a whole rebranded itself as the Pleasant District during the process and the streetscape design was coordinated to reinforce the new moniker, including a custom gateway signage element. Custom design elements helped connect to an adjacent park and tie the street back to the neighborhood in an authentic way. Client Village of Oak Park References Craig Failor Village Planner Village of Oak Park 708-358-5418 Bill McKenna Village Engineer The Village of Oak Park 708-358-5722 bmckenna@oak-park.us Awards Honor Award American Society of Landscape Architects, Illinois Chapter Gold Award for Implementation American Planning Association, Illinois Chapter Charter Award Congress of New Urbanism, Illinois Chapter Gold Award Brick Industry Association Marion Street + Pleasant District Streetscape Designs for a district that now defines downtown Oak Park Exhibit A Page 27 of 63 9CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLANExhibit A Page 28 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 10 “It feels like it’s been there forever, and it feels like it’s going to be there forever. … It’s kind of a bridge between the past and the future.” Oak Park Mayor Anan Abu-Taleb Exhibit A Page 29 of 63 11CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLANExhibit A Page 30 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 12 Downtown Oak Park’s Marion Street streetscape designed by The Lakota Group has become the gold standard for streetscape design in the region and is used as a model for leveraging public investment to spur economic development. Exhibit A Page 31 of 63 13CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLANExhibit A Page 32 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 14 PREPARED FOR: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKTINLEY PARK STREETSCAPE PROTOTYPES TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS © 2018 THE LAKOTA GROUPNOVEmbER 19, 2018 DOWNTOWN CORE | 2-WAY WITH TURNING LANE DRAFT Updated Ornamental Streetlight with Hanging Baskets Bike RacksExisting Street Width +/- 42’ FOC Updated Wayfinding Signage Paver Parkway Bench Movable Planters Curbed Parkway Planter with Ornamental Railing Shade Tree PREPARED FOR: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKTINLEY PARK STREETSCAPE PROTOTYPES TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS © 2018 THE LAKOTA GROUPNOVEmbER 19, 2018 DOWNTOWN CORE + FESTIVAL STREETS | INTERSECTIONS DRAFT Paver Crosswalks Piano Motif Paver Intersection - Harringbone Pattern Permeable Pavers Festival Street Tinley Park Streetscape Master Plan Providing a sustainable streetscape plan in Tinley Park’s downtown Exhibit A Page 33 of 63 15CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN PREPARED FOR: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKTINLEY PARK STREETSCAPE PROTOTYPES TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS © 2018 THE LAKOTA GROUPNOVEmbER 19, 2018 DOWNTOWN CORE | 2-WAY WITH TURNING LANE DRAFT Updated Ornamental Streetlight with Hanging Baskets Bike RacksExisting Street Width +/- 42’ FOC Updated Wayfinding Signage Paver Parkway Bench Movable Planters Curbed Parkway Planter with Ornamental Railing Shade Tree Tinley Park Streetscape Master Plan Statistics Start Date: November 2018 Completed: November 2019 Reference Kimberly Clarke, AICP Community Development Director Village of Tinley Park (708) 444-5177 kclarke@tinleypark.org The Lakota Group worked with The Village of Tinley Park to develop a conceptual streetscape master plan for downtown Tinley Park. A street hierarchy was developed to link prototypical conditions based on land use and right-of-way widths and apply designs to these corridors. Lakota developed designs for intersections and complete streets for an improved pedestrian realm and sustainable practices. Exhibit A Page 34 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 16 The Lakota Group was engaged by Rogers Park Business Alliance to create a corridor plan for Clark Street in the heart of the Rogers Park neighborhood. Significant bilingual outreach to residents and business owners was performed to ensure the plan reflected the vision of the overall community. Over 350 people attended the first two community meetings and 500 online and in-person surveys were completed. The final Corridor Master Plan synthesized all of the feedback received throughout the plan and graphically illustrates the issues and opportunities of the corridor and the vision for its future. Concepts outlined in the plan include economic development strategies, design, signage and wayfinding improvements, multi-modal transportation improvements and the enhancement and preservation of neighborhood character and history. An extensive implementation action plan was included to guide the community in achieving this vision. Client Rogers Park Business Alliance Reference Sandi Price Executive Director Rogers Park Business Alliance (773) 508-5885 sprice@rpba.org Awards Burnham Awards for Planning and Analysis American Society of Landscape Architects, Illinois Chapter 2020 Vision Clark Street Corridor Plan A community-led vision to revitalize the heart of Rogers Park Exhibit A Page 35 of 63 17CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN The Vision Clark Street plan provided strategies for placemaking, as well as concepts for refreshing the identity of this important neighborhood spine. Exhibit A Page 36 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 18 “We partnered with The Lakota Group to create a master plan for Clark Street in Rogers Park, and we could not be more impressed with the outcome. They have without a doubt mastered the art of coming up with creative concepts for a long time neglected commercial corridor, while successfully representing the voice of a very diverse community. “ Carolina Juarez, Special Service Area Manager Exhibit A Page 37 of 63 19CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Residents of the Rogers Park neighborhood have a high interest in sustainable solutions to physical improvements and a DIY spirit, which was captured in the plan. Exhibit A Page 38 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 20 The engagement process was designed to be inclusive for all community members and centered around local food and entertainment to attract people to join in the conversation. Exhibit A Page 39 of 63 21CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN celebrate THELAKE DIVERSITY&CULTURE LASPERSONAS COMUNIDADLATINA ECONOMIC/CLASSDIVERSITY LACOMIDAAUTÉNTICA THECONNECTEDCOMMUNITYTHATWORKSTOGETHER ACCESSTOLANDMETRA TREELINEDSTREETS AFFORDABLE EATS REALNEIGHBORHOODS REALPEOPLE INCLUSIONAND SOCIALACTION THEARTS GREAT ARCHITECTURE PROXIMITYMYNEIGHBORS KIDFRIENDLYSITES FAMILY FRIENDLYPEOPLE THEWAVES THEANIMALSANDTHEPEOPLE WALKINGTOTHINGSINSTEADOFDRIVING we RP BRAND // MARCA concept a // concepto a This concept draws on the existing “Celebrate Clark Street” banners and creates a brand inspired by its patterns and colors (shown bottom le). The bold type can be used on its own, as can the colorful hand drawn elements. Este concepto está inspirado en las banderas existentes "Celebrate Clark Street" y crea una marca que está inspirada en sus patrones y colores (abajo a la izquierda). El fuente en negrita se puede utilizar por sí mismo, al igual que los elementos de coloridos dibujados a mano. CLARKSTREET MINWALK MORSESTATION DIVVYSTATION BUSSTOP MINWALK MINWALK MINWALK celebrate THELAKE DIVERSITY&CULTURE LASPERSONAS COMUNIDADLATINA ECONOMIC/CLASSDIVERSITY LACOMIDAAUTÉNTICA THECONNECTED COMMUNITYTHAT WORKSTOGETHER ACCESSTOLANDMETRA TREELINEDSTREETS AFFORDABLE EATS REALNEIGHBORHOODS REALPEOPLE INCLUSIONAND SOCIALACTION THEARTS GREAT ARCHITECTURE PROXIMITYMYNEIGHBORS KIDFRIENDLYSITES FAMILY FRIENDLYPEOPLE THEWAVES THEANIMALSANDTHEPEOPLE WALKINGTOTHINGSINSTEADOFDRIVING we RP BRAND // MARCA concept a // concepto a This concept draws on the existing “Celebrate Clark Street” banners and creates a brand inspired by its patterns and colors (shown bottom le). The bold type can be used on its own, as can the colorful hand drawn elements. Este concepto está inspirado en las banderas existentes "Celebrate Clark Street" y crea una marca que está inspirada en sus patrones y colores (abajo a la izquierda). El fuente en negrita se puede utilizar por sí mismo, al igual que los elementos de coloridos dibujados a mano. CLARKSTREET MINWALK MORSESTATION DIVVYSTATION BUSSTOP MINWALK MINWALK MINWALK 17CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN • INTRODUCTION The first Community Open House was held on May 30, 2017 in a vacant storefront on Clark Street. Roughly 200 community stakeholders were in attendance, including residents, business owners, Rogers Park Business Alliance Board members, 49th Ward Alderman’s office staff, and various community organizations. This workshop introduced the project and planning process to the community, while providing a series of interactive exercises to engage the participants on what they considered to be the biggest assets and issues along the corridor and what their top priorities were for the plan. At each station, participants were encouraged to engage in an open dialogue with the project team and other attendees. These stations included: »Welcome/introductory boards. »Historic exhibits showcasing a series of historic images of buildings and street scenes within the project area. »Existing conditions boards featuring the corridor’s land uses, transportation amenities and conditions, and the current and projected demographics. A series of existing conditions images that were taken during the team’s fieldwork were projected on a wall. Materials distributed for Community Open House #1 community open house #1 share your CLARK STREET Join Us for an Open House for The VISION Clark Street Plan process is sponsored by the Rogers Park Business Alliance, working alongside a consulting team led by The Lakota Group—a local Chicago ﬁrm specializing in community planning and design. In an ideal world, how would you like to experience Clark Street? Come and share your ideas on how to strengthen the identity and vitality of Clark Street. Your participation will help develop a plan to transform the future of Clark Street in Rogers Park! Learn more at facebook.com/VisionClarkStreet Tuesday, May 30 • 5-8pm • 7004 N. Clark Street »Big map exercise (Figure 9), where participants placed colored dots along a 10’x3.5’ map to identify: • key landmarks and destinations • opportunities for placemaking, branding, and public spaces • potential development or redevelopment sites • problem intersections, crossings, and sidewalks. »Visual preference survey to gauge the community’s preferences regarding the potential character of the Clark Street corridor. »Mason jar priority voting exercise (Figure 10), where Open House attendees were asked to vote on their top ten priorities (out of 13) by placing balls (votes) into various mason jars. stay involved // mantengase involucrado facebook.com/VisionClarkStreet thelakotagroup.com/projects/vision-clark-street Carolina Juarez • cjuarez@rpba.org 773.508-5885 17CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN • INTRODUCTION The first Community Open House was held on May 30, 2017 in a vacant storefront on Clark Street. Roughly 200 community stakeholders were in attendance, including residents, business owners, Rogers Park Business Alliance Board members, 49th Ward Alderman’s office staff, and various community organizations. This workshop introduced the project and planning process to the community, while providing a series of interactive exercises to engage the participants on what they considered to be the biggest assets and issues along the corridor and what their top priorities were for the plan. At each station, participants were encouraged to engage in an open dialogue with the project team and other attendees. These stations included: »Welcome/introductory boards. »Historic exhibits showcasing a series of historic images of buildings and street scenes within the project area. »Existing conditions boards featuring the corridor’s land uses, transportation amenities and conditions, and the current and projected demographics. A series of existing conditions images that were taken during the team’s fieldwork were projected on a wall. Materials distributed for Community Open House #1 community open house #1 share your CLARK STREET Join Us for an Open House for The VISION Clark Street Plan process is sponsored by the Rogers Park Business Alliance, working alongside a consulting team led by The Lakota Group—a local Chicago ﬁrm specializing in community planning and design. In an ideal world, how would you like to experience Clark Street? Come and share your ideas on how to strengthen the identity and vitality of Clark Street. Your participation will help develop a plan to transform the future of Clark Street in Rogers Park! Learn more at facebook.com/VisionClarkStreet Tuesday, May 30 • 5-8pm • 7004 N. Clark Street »Big map exercise (Figure 9), where participants placed colored dots along a 10’x3.5’ map to identify: • key landmarks and destinations • opportunities for placemaking, branding, and public spaces • potential development or redevelopment sites • problem intersections, crossings, and sidewalks. »Visual preference survey to gauge the community’s preferences regarding the potential character of the Clark Street corridor. »Mason jar priority voting exercise (Figure 10), where Open House attendees were asked to vote on their top ten priorities (out of 13) by placing balls (votes) into various mason jars. stay involved // mantengase involucrado facebook.com/VisionClarkStreet thelakotagroup.com/projects/vision-clark-street Carolina Juarez • cjuarez@rpba.org 773.508-5885 1CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN • INTRODUCTION CLARK STREET NOVEMBER 2, 2017 The project brand was extended into the physical realm to help form a cohesive identity for the area. The RPBA is moving forward with the brand as their new standard. Exhibit A Page 40 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 22 Night image of streetscape and plaza designed by Lakota in Homewood, Illinois. Downtown Homewood Streetscape Design The Lakota Group worked with the Village of Homewood to lead a study of Homewood’s downtown and determine the feasibility of a new open space to serve the public. The needs and desires for the downtown area were determined by engaging project stakeholders and the local community. Based on that study’s findings Lakota led a multi-disciplinary team through design and construction for multiple blocks of the downtown. The recently- constructed project includes flexible streets that can be used for community events, additional plantings, entry monuments, overhead tivoli lights, and a fire feature. Downtown Homewood’s character was maintained and enhanced by highlighting an existing mural and designing monuments that reflect the Art Deco design of the existing Village Hall. Statistics Start Date: November 2013 Completed: May 2016 Reference Jim Marino, Village Manager Village of Homewood (708) 206-3377 jmarino@village.homewood.il.us Homewood, IL Exhibit A Page 41 of 63 23CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Downtown Homewood Streetscape Design Exhibit A Page 42 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 24 President’s Award for Urban Design- Constructed Project Illinois Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects Public Works Project of the Year American Public Works Association Implementation Award Illinois Chapter of the American Planning Association Lockport Street Design Plainfield, IL Exhibit A Page 43 of 63 25CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Statistics Start Date: September 2007 Completed: June 2009 Reference Jonathan Proulx Village Planner Village of Plainfield (815) 609-6139 jproulx@goplainfield.com Lakota led a design team charged with the revitalization of Lockport Street, Plainfield’s main commercial corridor. The approach for the project was to reconfigure the street using a Road Diet, which converted four lanes to 3 lanes, providing additional sidewalk space and room for bicycles. The streetscape design focuses on rejuvenating this historic “Main Street” with a rich variety of materials and flexible outdoor gathering spaces. The design includes natural stone walls, brick paving, new site furniture and lighting, raised speed tables at intersections, new plantings, street trees, and custom signage and wayfinding elements. The result of the project was the creation of a walkable and active street, re-establishing Lockport Street as the center of downtown. Implementing a road diet on Lockport Street reallocated space to pedestrians and re- established it as the heart of downtown Plainfield. Exhibit A Page 44 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 26 Lake Street StreetscapeMaster Plan OUR WORK Related Projects Exhibit A Page 45 of 63 27CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN CLIENTLAKE STREET STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS OAK PARK, ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 21, 2017 FOREST AVENUE SPECIALTY FEATURE - CONCEPT A1 VIEW LOOKING NORTH PLAN VIEW VIEW LOOKING SOUTH H K J I G F B E A C D B F K J G D B H 2X3 BLUESTONE PAVERS GRANITE SEATWALL GRANITE CURB GRANITE PLINTH WITH GLOBE LIGHT (TO MATCH KENILWORTH SPECIALTY FEATURE) COLUMNAR TREE PIN SET METAL SIGN PANELS - Backlit RAISED GRANITE WATER FEATURE - Water jets with uplights - Water  ows down to intermediate & lower levels plinths LOWER LEVEL GRANITE WATER FEATURE WITH INFINITY EDGE SPILLING INTO TRENCH DRAIN SMOOTH GRANITE PAVERS TEXTURED GRANITE BANDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL (FINAL LOCATION TBD) LEGEND A B C D E F G H I J K OUR WORK Related Projects Statistics Start Date: October 2016 Completed: Ongoing Reference Bill McKenna Village Engineer The Village of Oak Park (708) 358-5722 bmckenna@oak-park.us Building off of the Lake Street Master Plan that was adopted in 2012, the Lake Street streetscape improvements from Harlem Avenue to Euclid Avenue along Lake Street in the Village of Oak Park were completed in early 2020. The streetscape amenities pull from the material palette used in the Marion Street and Pleasant District streetscape improvement projects, but with an eye on providing nodes of activity within Oak Park’s downtown. Streetscape amenity improvements include: bluestone paving, pavers in intersections, seating areas, bike racks, granite and movable planters, lighting, water features, wayfinding, and gateway and directional signage. Exhibit A Page 46 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 28 Uptown Park Ridge Streetscape Design Gold Award Illinois Chapter of the American Planning Association Gold Key Award Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago OUR WORK Related Projects Oak Park, IL Park Ridge, IL Exhibit A Page 47 of 63 29CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Lakota participated as a member of a development team hired by the City of Park Ridge to prepare a master plan and urban design for a key multi-block area in its Uptown district. The plan focuses on the pedestrian-oriented “Main Street” character of the district by framing street walls with first-floor retail and upper- story residential uses. The streetscape design establishes the theme for future redevelopment efforts throughout Uptown. A design theme was developed to complement and reflect the Art Deco architecture of the Pickwick Theater, a historic focal building in the heart of the Uptown district. As part of a second design phase, Lakota also created redevelopment and streetscape design concepts for the City Commons, which comprises Uptown’s central open space, library complex, and adjacent blocks. Since the inception of the original streetscape design, four phases of reconstruction have been completed. Statistics Phase I Completed: 2007 Phase II Completed: 2008 Phase III Completed: 2014 Phase IV Design Completed: 2017 Reference Juliana Maller Village Manager, Hanover Park Former Deputy City Manager, Park Ridge (630) 823-5600 jmaller@hpil.org OUR WORK Related Projects Exhibit A Page 48 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 30 0’200’400’NORTH S H A R R I S O N S T R E E T LA F O X R I V E R D R I V E S RI V E R R O A D RIDGE STREETJACKSON STREETN H A R R I S O N S T R E E TWASHINGTON STREETW ALGONQUIN ROADFRONT STREETEDWARD STREETMADISON STREETWESTER N A L G O N Q UI N B Y P A S S RAILRO A D S T R E E T S M A I N S T R E E T N M A I N S T R E E T JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T FOX RIVER 31 62Towne Park CornishPark Crystal Lake Outlet A C K K O R B D E H F P G N M M J I RiverfrontPark Historic Village Hall Algonquin Streetscape Master Plan Algonquin, IL Exhibit A Page 49 of 63 31CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN STREETSCAPE PALETTE Statistics Start Date: April 2015 Completed: July 2015 Reference Michael Kerr, PE Executive Vice President, Head of Civil Engineering Christopher B. Burke Engineering Ltd. mkerr@cbbel.com The Algonquin Main Street/Downtown Streetscape Master Plan is organized around a three tiered hierarchy of the roadway network. This hierarchy was developed through analysis of the existing streetscape. Factors in the analysis included the presence of commercial or retail land use, level of existing pedestrian activity, redevelopment potential of adjacent sites, potential for increased pedestrian activity, and opportunities for closing roadway segments for festivals and special events. The goal of the hierarchy was to: »Provide a framework to rationalize the level of cost and complexity of streetscape investments for individual segments of the streetscape network »Use in developing initial order-of-magnitude cost estimates »Help organize and structure decision making relative to appropriate prioritization of investment and implementation phasing. The Master Plan guided the more detailed design of Main Street, which includes a new arched gateway, community plaza space with a focal point outdoor fireplace, seat walls and site furniture, custom planters, signs, and fence elements, and brick pavers and landscape improvements. This initial phase was completed in late 2019. Exhibit A Page 50 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 32 Exhibit A Page 51 of 63 33CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN 3. Our Team Exhibit A Page 52 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 34 The Lakota Group is a team of professionals who work shoulder-to-shoulder with clients over the long term, going the extra mile, making personal connections, and traveling the long journey together. Exhibit A Page 53 of 63 35CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Our defining attribute is fostered through a team-based approach to project management centered on positive dialogue. Led by our drive to institute change in a sustainable way, Lakota associates abide by a process that combines critical thinking and community engagement. The result? A practice that seeks to produce the most effectively efficient solutions, carefully balancing the real with the ideal. Our quest is simple: we want to improve communities. By engaging local residents through workshops, discussions and surveys, we strive to pinpoint the opportunities for improvement. We want clients to help us place ourselves in their frame of context: what would we want if we were the ones living in their town? Working in their building? Raising a family in their neighborhood? We want to listen, and we want to talk, and then we want to listen some more. Lakota acknowledges the issues, while also recognizing the strengths, shedding light on the qualities that make a place unique, and brainstorming the ways upon which they can be built. Since the firm’s conception in 1993, Lakota has completed award-winning assignments in more than 500 towns and cities across the country, gaining recognition for its work in landscape architecture, waterfront planning, site planning, design, and community engagement. Through its mold-breaking and place-making mentality, Lakota relishes the coalescence between land and community, ultimately demonstrating a practice that perfectly reflects its name: “Allies,” the English translation of the Native American word, Lakota. The Lakota Group is a team of talented designers, planners, and communicators powered by a passion to offer creative solutions. Heart & Soul Exhibit A Page 54 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 36 Kevin brings over 20 years of experience in urban planning and landscape architecture to The Lakota Group, where he oversees the firm’s urban design projects. His award-winning portfolio spans downtown, transit-oriented and neighborhood revitalization plans, physical and economic development strategies, and innovative design of open spaces and public places. He is passionate about dynamic and interactive public processes and works to integrate innovative technology throughout all of Lakota’s projects. SIGNATURE PROJECTS Streetscape & Urban Design • Lockport Street Streetscape - Plainfield, IL • Marion Street Streetscape - Oak Park, IL • Pleasant District Streetscape - Oak Park, IL • Uptown Park Ridge Streetscape - Park Ridge, IL • Algonquin Downtown Streetscape - Algonquin, IL • Lake Street Streetscape - Oak Park, IL • Homewood Downtown Streetscape - Homewood, IL Open Space and Park Design • Howard Park - South Bend, IN • Hubbard Woods Park - Winnetka, IL • Skokie Playfields - Winnetka, IL • Hesburgh Library Plaza - Notre Dame, IN • Swedish Heritage Park - Loves Park, IL • City Commons - Park Ridge, IL Landscape Architecture & Site Design • Irish Green – Notre Dame, IN • Delnor Hospital Landscape Master Plan – Geneva, IL • Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital Landscape Improvements - Winfield, IL • Lake Forest Place Landscape Design – Presbyterian Homes - Lake Forest, IL Urban & Regional Planning • East Point Form-Based Code - East Point, GA • Downtown Master Plan - Evanston, IL • Riverfront Neighborhoods Comprehensive Plan Update – Moline, IL • MedQuarter Master Plan – Cedar Rapids, IA • Downtown Strategic Development Plan – Kenosha, WI • Illinois Medical District Master Plan – Chicago, IL • Willow Road Corridor Plan – Northfield/Winnetka, IL • State of Oregon Main Street Revitalization Services – OR • Village Center Master Plan – Wilmette, IL HOMETOWN Louisville, Kentucky EDUCATION University of Illinois at Chicago Master of Urban Planning and Policy Chicago, IL (2006) University of Kentucky Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture Lexington, KY (2000) ORGANIZATIONS • American Planning Association • American Society of Landscape Architects, Awards Jury (2014) • Congress for New Urbanism • American Institute of Architects, Associate Member • American Planning Association Mentorship Program • Lambda Alpha, ELY Chapter • Uptown Development Partners • Greentown Advisory Committee (2014) • UIC Professional Development Panel (2010) EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 16 Years of Practice: 21 KEVIN CLARKPLA AICP PRINCIPAL & DIRECTOR OF DESIGN | 2005 – PRESENT Exhibit A Page 55 of 63 37CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Siraj is an architect and urban planner with diverse design experience. His portfolio includes projects in downtown planning, placemaking, park and recreational master plans, wayfinding, and urban restoration. With a strong focus on community engagement, Siraj believes in innovative, practical, and enduring planning and design. Raised in Beirut, Lebanon, he advocates for community resiliency and the power of unconventional design. He holds a degree in Architecture from the Lebanese American University and a master’s degree from DePaul University in Chicago. Siraj has participated in and won multiple design challenges in Lebanon, Dubai, and more recently in Chicago. SIGNATURE PROJECTS Vision Clark Street Master Plan - Chicago, IL Lakota is working with the Rogers Park Business Alliance to help engage the community and create a shared vision for the revitalization of their downtown. Branded materials created for the project brought visual unity to the engagement and planning process and were woven into concepts for placemaking and urban design improvements. Siraj aided the team in producing renderings, marketing for the public events, and facilitating the community open house. Tinley Park Downtown Placemaking Study and Plaza Design - Tinley Park, IL As part of the overall Placemaking Plan for downtown Tinley Park, The Lakota Group is currently studying and developing several land planning scenarios for key downtown opportunity sites, including mixed-use and multi-family residential buildings. Lakota is designing and illustrating desired and appropriate form, massing, orientation, and character necessary to support functional, attractive and activated public space. After the downtown development phase, Lakota is designing Harmony Square, a plaza in downtown Tinley Park. Siraj is assisting in research, design, graphics production and the public engagement process. Niles Arts and Culture Plan - Niles, IL The Lakota Group worked on the refinement of preliminary arts and culture planning concepts presented during the Community Speak-Out and the integration of community engagement findings into an Arts and Culture Plan. Siraj assisted in research, graphics creation and public outreach process. Peoria Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Plan - Tulsa, Oklahoma Lakota led the development of a corridor wide land use plan and implementation strategy focused on leveraging capital investments in a critical new BRT transit line as an opportunity for economic development and placemaking. As part of this process, the project team employed a form-based approach to future station area zoning and development. Michael helped to lead the project’s public participation efforts and served a central role in developing land use policies. San Antonio Mission District Design Guidelines - City of San Antonio, TX The City of San Antonio’s Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) and World Heritage Office (WHO) worked with The Lakota Group to create a Design Manual specific to the Mission Historic District and the historic and other building resources located within the World Heritage Buffer Zone. Objectives of the design manual include articulating the unique and character-defining features and geographic areas within the District that exemplify the cultural attributes or themes that distinguish the District Siraj assisted the planning team in research, graphic production, and the public outreach process. HOMETOWN Beirut, Lebanon EDUCATION DePaul University Master of Sustainable Urban Development Chicago, IL (2017) Harvard School of Design Master of Sustainable Urban Executive Studies in Urban Design Boston, MA (2016) Lebanese American University Bachelor of Architecture Minor in Graphic Design Beirut, Lebanon (2015) ORGANIZATIONS • American Institute of Architects • American Planning Association • Chicago Architecture Foundation EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 7 Years of Practice: 10 SIRAJ ASFAHANIAIA VICE PRESIDENT | 2016 – PRESENT Exhibit A Page 56 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 38 Morgan is a landscape architect whose background focuses on sustainable design and land and water conservation with an emphasis in public spaces. Her experience spans a variety of scales, from producing land use master planning deliverables to site design construction documents. Highly inspired by the synergy between ecological systems and culturally defined human landscapes, she aims to provide comprehensive landscape solutions that establish a unique sense of place. SIGNATURE PROJECTS Oak Street Promenade – Gold Coast, Chicago, IL Lakota is working with the newly-formed Oak Street Council to envision and implement a placemaking plan for Oak Street in Chicago’s Gold Coast neighborhood. The Lakota team has engaged property and business owners, CDOT, and the local Alderman to develop a program and concepts for both a short-term and permanent closure of Oak Street. From the process, Lakota branded the new pedestrian street the Oak Street Promenade and developed a plan for a high end destination that mimics a garden cocktail party. Morgan is assisting with design and placemaking strategies for the project. Ravenswood People Spots - Ravenswood, Chicago, IL The Lakota Group partnered with the Greater Ravenswood Chamber of Commerce to bring beautiful and unique community gathering spaces to the neighborhood. The process included outreach and discussions with key stakeholders prior to developing concepts. Construction of the People Spots was completed in Fall, 2022. Morgan assisted with with communication strategies and graphic production of conceptual ideas and led the project through detailing, construction documentation, permitting, and construction administration. Jon Hunt Memorial Plaza - South Bend, IN South Bend engaged the Lakota Group to re-envision a 1.5 acre downtown plaza as an urban multi-use plaza while paying tribute to the adjacent and iconic Morris Theater. The site design features scalable spaces for a variety of programming and four season use as well as a large turf lawn anchored by a stage on one end and a sculpture garden with a grand stepping fountain on the other. A forecourt and terraced lawn accommodates daily activies and circulation as well as special events. Morgan assisted with site design and was responsible for developing fundraising/marketing graphics and high level budgets. Harmony Square - Tinley Park, IL Tinley Park engaged the Lakota Group to re-envision a 1.6 acre downtown site as an urban multi-use plaza, featuring flexible open spaces for a variety of programming and four season use. The design features a large artificial turf lawn anchored by a stage on one end and a focal “gateway” plaza with a splash pad on the other. The lawn accommodates a winter ice rink, while seasonal fire pits, seating, and a Christmas tree are brought out to enhance the winter experience. Morgan assisted with site design and preparing graphic materials. Tinley Park Downtown Streetscape - Tinley Park, IL The Lakota Group worked with The Village of Tinley Park to develop a conceptual streetscape master plan for downtown Tinley Park. A street hierarchy was developed to link prototypical conditions based on land use and right-of-way widths to apply designs to these corridors. Lakota developed designs for intersections, complete streets, improved pedestrian realm, and sustainable practices. Morgan assisted with design and development of the master plan document, prototype models, and material selections. HOMETOWN Gurnee, Illinois EDUCATION Iowa State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture Ames, IA (2016) ORGANIZATIONS • American Society of Landscape Architects EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 6 Years of Practice: 8 MORGAN CHAPMANPLA ASLA SENIOR ASSOCIATE | 2018 – PRESENT Exhibit A Page 57 of 63 39CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Hannah is a designer and planner whose background focuses on landscape architecture studies and urban planning. Her experience has led her to work on a wide range of projects from city park designs, site concept studies, mixed-use developments, and placemaking initiatives to comprehensive planning, corridor planning, and downtown master planning all with a focus on community engagement. She has worked on numerous corridor plans and studies, assisting with land use analysis, design, and strategy development. The intersection between design and public engagement fuels her passion to give voice to different groups and ideas and to find innovative and community-specific solutions to complex problems. SIGNATURE PROJECTS Wheeling Restaurant Row Corridor Plan – Wheeling, IL The Lakota Group worked with the Village of Wheeling to build a dynamic vision for Milwaukee Avenue that emphasizes connectivity, placemaking, and revitalization to support and improve the Restaurant Row brand. The Plan serves to guide the Village’s decision-making on development and allocating resources along the Corridor now and into the future. It provides specific improvements and recommendations and a clear roadmap on funding, priority level, and timeline to achieve the Plans goal. Hannah served as project manager and led the team in the final production of the report’s research, writing, and graphic creation. Cicero Avenue Corridor Study – Chicago, IL The City of Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) partnered with the Department of Planning and Development (DPD), to create the Cicero Avenue Corridor Study. As a sub- consultant, Lakota evaluated land use and private developments and investigated potential land use improvements. Hannah assisted with research, analysis, and production of supportive graphics and maps. Wells Street Corridor Plan - Old Town, Chicago, IL Lakota is working with the Old Town Merchants and Residents Association (OTMRA) and SSA #48 to re-envision Old Town’s primary mixed-use street. The plan examines post- pandemic economic development strategies, short-term placemaking interventions, and long-range streetscape and urban design recommendations to upgrade the pedestrian and shopping experience. Hannah supported community engagement efforts and contributed to conceptual urban design graphics. Oak Street Promenade - Gold Coast, Chicago, IL Lakota is working with the newly formed Oak Street Council to envision and implement a placemaking plan for Oak Street in Chicago’s Gold Coast neighborhood. The Lakota team has engaged property and business owners, CDOT, and the local Alderman to develop a program and concepts for both a short-term and permanent closure of Oak Street. From the process, Lakota branded the new pedestrian street the Oak Street Promenade and developed a plan for a high-end destination that mimics a garden cocktail party. Hannah is serving as a project manager for the project. HOMETOWN Cincinnati, Ohio EDUCATION University of Illinois Master of Urban Planning and Policy Chicago, IL (2020) University of Colorado Bachelors in Environmental Design Minor in Business Administration Boulder, CO (2016) ORGANIZATIONS • American Planning Association • Women in Planning and Development EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 3 Years of Practice: 6 HANNAH BADER PROJECT MANAGER | 2020 – PRESENT Exhibit A Page 58 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 40 Alexis is a planner and designer who has experience working on a wide range of project types, from mixed-use development master planning to placemaking initiatives to community-informed framework plans. Her multidisciplinary background in community development, design, and housing development has allowed her to work with numerous communities, public agencies, municipalities, and private developers to help achieve their visions for vibrant and resilient urban places. She believes that innovative design is best achieved through comprehensive public engagement processes and is committed to working alongside communities to design places that are sustainable and livable. SIGNATURE PROJECTS Keith Creek Corridor Plan - Rockford, IL Region 1 Planning Council engaged the Lakota Group to create a corridor plan for the Keith Creek neighborhood that addressed mobility, economic development, flood mitigation, and sustainability through urban design, placemaking, and transportation planning. The result was a plan for a vibrant and resilient neighborhood with plenty of recreational opportunities, community gathering places, economic development opportunities, and flood mitigation strategies. Alexis was responsible for project management, goal and strategy creation, and the production of graphics, maps, and writing for the final plan document. DuPage County Mobility Plan - DuPage County, IL The Regional Transportation Authority and DuPage County Division of Transportation engaged the Lakota Group to create a comprehensive moility plan focused on forming a coordinated vision for the future of mobility in the county. The plan establishes strategies for inter-agency collaboration, funding and investment, mobility connectivity, land use, equity and access, and more. Alexis was responsible for project management, vision, goal and strategy creation, the production of graphics, maps, and writing, as well as the creation of the final document. Hobart Comprehensive Plan - Hobart, IN The City of Hobart worked with the Lakota group to update its Comprehensive Plan to help guide the future of development, recreation, sustainability, housing, and other key community initiatives. The Plan helps the City to address economic, demographic, environmental, and physical changes occurring within Hobart and harness the opportunity to create a resilient, well-designed, and livable community. Alexis assisted with the overall land use strategy, as well as planning strategies and action items. She also supported the production of master planning concepts, graphics, and maps for the final Plan. Wheeling Restaurant Row Corridor Plan - Wheeling, IL The Village of Wheeling engaged the Lakota Group to create a Corridor Plan for Restaurant Row in order to enhance connectivity, encourage economic development, and create a vibrant streetscape along Milwaukee Avenue and the western edge of the Des Plaines River. The plan built a dynamic vision for the corridor that emphasized walkability, placemaking, and revitalization. Alexis was responsible for the first phase of planning, including analyzing existing conditions and gathering stakeholder feedback. She was responsible for creating key strategies and action items and assisted with the creation of maps and graphics. HOMETOWN Denver, Colorado EDUCATION University of Illinois Master of Urban Planning and Policy Chicago, IL (2019) DePaul University Bachelor of Arts International Studies and Geography Chicago, IL (2016) ORGANIZATIONS • American Planning Association • Women in Planning & Development EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 2 Years of Practice: 4 ALEXIS STEIN ASSOCIATE | 2021 – PRESENT Exhibit A Page 59 of 63 41CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN HOMETOWN Lima, Peru EDUCATION Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru Bachelor in Architecture and Urbanism Lima, Peru (2016) EXPERIENCE Years with Lakota: 1 Years of Practice: 7 CARL O S TERR Y ASSOCIA TE | 2021 – PRESENT Carlos is an architectural and landscape designer with 7 years of experience in design practice in Chicago and previously in Lima, Peru. He has worked on the planning, design and presentation of public open space projects including schools, education facilities, parks, playgrounds, trails, plazas and streetscapes. S IGNA TURE PROJECTS Joliet Historic Design Guidelines Manual- Joliet, IL The Lakota Group is developing a Historic Design Guidelines Manual for Joliet’s locally designated historic landmarks and historic districts to assist the Joliet residents, property owners, and the Joliet Historic Preservation Commission in undertaking appropriate and sensitive rehabilitation, additions, and new construction. Carlos has assisted the planning team with the production of design guidelines illustrations and elevations of rehabilitated historic facades. Cicero Avenue Corridor Study- Chicago, IL The Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) is partnering with the Department of Planning and Development (DPD), to create a study to improve Cicero Avenue Corridor. As a sub-consultant, The Lakota Group will evaluate land use and private development, and investigate potential land use improvements. Carlos has assisted with graphic production. Downtown Itasca Strategic Action Plan- Itasca, IL The Village of Itasca is working with the Lakota Group to create a vision for the Downtown and surrounding area that leverages existing transportation facilities and infrastructure, real estate development opportunities, and community involvement to create a downtown that is welcoming and an active meeting place for residents and visitors. Carlos has assisted in the production of graphics for this project. Westminster Place Exterior Way inding & Signage Plan- Evanston, IL The Lakota Group is creating a clear, organized and compelling branded Wayfinding and Signage program that provides easy to read community identification, directions and orientation to allow residents, visitors and staff to safely navigate to their homes or campus destinations. As part of the design team, Carlos has assisted in the production of concepts and illustrations for this project. Exhibit A Page 60 of 63 THE LAKOTA GROUP 42 4. Our Costs Exhibit A Page 61 of 63 43CITY OF DES PLAINES | OAKTON STREET ACTION PLAN Project Budget » PROJECT TERMS: The above services will be provided on an hourly rate basis with a not to exceed fee of $36,800 per the firm’s current rates, plus reimbursable expenses. Lakota $ 36,800 Professional Fees Subtotal: $36,800 Reimbursable Expenses (4%): $ 1,440 Total Project Cost: $38,240 Any dditional services requested of Lakota beyond those listed above will be conducted on an hourly basis and billed according to Lakota’s current billing rates. If requested, a fee estimate will be provided for a task or an assignment based on a defined work scope. Lakota Billing Rates (2023): President $320 Principal $305 Associate Principal $245 Vice President $225 Senior Associate $205 Project Planner/Designer/Manager $190 Planner/Urban Designer/Landscape Architect $140-$155 Research/Operations Staff $100 Reimbursable expenses will be billed at 1.1 times direct expense to cover administration and will include:  Travel for field work/site visits to review existing conditions (mileage/tolls/parking/cabs)  Delivery (postage/messenger/express)  Copying/Reproduction  Computer Plots  Long Distance Communication  Additional Renderings/Models (if requested by client)  Special Supplies (If mounted boards or additional graphic materials are requested)  Miscellaneous (municipal documents, special reports, data) The Lakota Group appreciates the opportunity to provide the City of Des Plaines with Professional Planning and Design Consulting Services. Exhibit A Page 62 of 63 Exhibit A Page 63 of 63 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: November 21, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Jonathan Stytz, AICP, Senior Planner Ryan Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Cc: Tim Oakley, Director of Public Works and Engineering John LaBerg, Civil Engineer Subject: Approve Vacation of Public Alley Near 1864 Illinois Street (6th Ward) Issue: Dinara Robles and Pekin Bayramli, owners of the property at 1864 Illinois Street, have requested that the City vacate a public alley (right-of-way) so that they have the ability to fully utilize the land as part of their residential property. Analysis: The property, which is bounded by an improved alley to its west and an unimproved right-of-way to its south, encompasses approximately 6,313 square feet (0.14 acres). The property consists of one parcel with a single-family residence, detached garage, and various hard surfaces. The existing unimproved 1,863- square-foot City alley does not contain any utility lines. An appraisal was performed by Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corporation and is attached. The appraisal assigns a market value of $3,000. City Council Action: Per City Code (Section 8-1-9: Vacation of Public Streets and Alleys), the City Council has the authority to approve vacations for compensation that is “…fair market value of the property acquired or … the benefits which will accrue to them by reason of that vacation.” The Council may approve attached Ordinance M-22-23 to approve the Plat of Vacation and to vacate the alley for $3,000. Ordinance passage requires a 3/4 affirmative vote of the Council. Attachments Attachment 1: Aerial/Location Map Attachment 2: Plat of Survey Attachment 3: Site Photos Attachment 4: Appraisal Report Ordinance M-22-23 Exhibit A: Plat of Vacation MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 55 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONSENT AGENDA #10. ROW Alley next to 1864 Illinois Street NotesPrint Date: 10/10/20230150300 ft Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground. Applicant's Property Alley requested to be vacated Attachment 1 Page 2 of 55 Attachment 2Page 3 of 55 Alley Near 1864 Illinois St – Unimproved Alley Facing West Alley Near 1864 Illinois St – Unimproved Alley Facing East Alley Near 1864 Illinois St – West Entrance View From Illinois St V Alley Near 1864 Illinois St – East Entrance View from Improved Alley Attachment 3Page 4 of 55 APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY SECTION OF ALLEY LOCATED NEXT TO 1864 Illinois Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP Senior Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE APPRAISAL: October 16, 2023 DATE OF REPORT: November 17, 2023 TYPE OF REPORT: Appraisal Report PREPARED BY: Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS CHICAGO METRO REALTY VALUATION CORP. NICHOLAS F. SOLANO, MAI, FRICS 1363 Shermer Road, Suite 334 Northbrook, IL 60062 630-544-1342 Attachment 4 Page 5 of 55 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com SECTION OF ALLEY LOCATED NEXT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET DES PLAINES, IL 60016 Attachment 4 Page 6 of 55 CHICAGO METRO REALTY VALUATION CORP. Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com November 17, 2023 Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP Senior Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 SUBJECT RE: Alley Adjacent to 1864 Illinois Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 Dear Mr. Stytz: As requested, an inspection and appraisal have been prepared on the referenced subject property for the purpose of developing my opinion of the market value for the fee simple estate for disposition decisions. Investigations and analysis were completed to conform to the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The accompanying appraisal report contains summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that are used in the appraisal process, whereas additional documentation is retained in the file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and the intended use of the appraisal. The subject property of this appraisal consists of 1,875 SF of land area dedicated as a public alley that is currently improved with a lawn and adjacent to the single-family property located adjacent to 1864 Illinois Street. The subject property is non-buildable as a standalone property due to size and zoning restrictions. Being non-buildable separately as a standalone site, the subject property has a limited use and market that affects value. The property was appraised using sales of non-buildable parcels of land. Based on the analyses and conclusions in the accompanying report, and subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions expressed in this report, my opinion of value for the subject property is as follows. Attachment 4 Page 7 of 55 Mr. Jonathan Stytz, AICP City of Des Plaines November 17, 2023 Page 2 1363 SHERMER ROAD, SUITE 334, NORTHBROOK, IL 60062, PHONE: 630-544-1342 nsolano@chicagometrovalue.com Premise Estate Effective Date Value Market Value Fee Simple October 16, 2023 $3,000 MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the attached report. The above value conclusion is also based on the following hypothetical conditions and/or extraordinary assumptions 1 that may affect the value. 1) None. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Regards, Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS IL Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #553.000268, exp. 09/30/2025 1 Extraordinary Assumption is an assignment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Hypothetical Condition is a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. (Source: USPAP) Attachment 4 Page 8 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 3 Identification of the Subject Property ................................................................................... 3 Legal Description of the Subject Property ............................................................................. 3 Ownership and Sales History of the Subject Property........................................................... 3 Client, Intended Use and Intended User ............................................................................... 3 Property Rights Appraised ..................................................................................................... 3 Definition of Fee Simple Estate .............................................................................................. 4 Ownership Interest Appraised ............................................................................................... 4 Type and Definition of Value ................................................................................................. 4 Scope of Work for the Appraisal ............................................................................................ 5 Real Estate & Real Property ................................................................................................... 5 Intangible Assets .................................................................................................................... 6 Personal Property .................................................................................................................. 6 Type of Report ....................................................................................................................... 6 Disclosure of Competency ..................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION AND MARKET INFORMATION ....................................................... 14 Regional Map ......................................................................................................................... 7 National Economic Indicators ................................................................................................ 7 Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 9 Market Area Description ........................................................................................................ 9 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ................................................................. 19 Location Satellite Views ....................................................................................................... 12 Overview of Des Plaines Single-Family Market ................................................................... 13 Aerial Views of Subject Property ......................................................................................... 17 Plat of Vacation for Subject Property .................................................................................. 18 FEMA Flood Hazard Map ..................................................................................................... 19 Description of Subject Property ........................................................................................... 19 Adjacent Properties: ............................................................................................................ 21 Zoning Map .......................................................................................................................... 22 Zoning Information .............................................................................................................. 22 Highest and Best Use Analyses ............................................................................................ 26 VALUATION METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 27 Sales Comparison Approach To Value (Method One) ......................................................... 28 Analysis and Adjustment of Sales Data ................................................................................ 34 Value Indications by Sales Comparison Approach (Method One) ....................................... 35 Discount to Buildable Land (Method Two) .......................................................................... 36 Reconciliation of Market Value............................................................................................ 37 Exposure Time ...................................................................................................................... 37 Certification.......................................................................................................................... 38 General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions .................................................................... 39 Attachment 4 Page 9 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ADDENDA .................................................................................................... 42 Photographs ......................................................................................................................... 43 Plat of Vacation of Subject Property Appraiser Qualifications Attachment 4 Page 10 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. INTRODUCTION IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property is a section of alley adjacent to 1864 Illinois Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 in Cook County and adjacent to the south of tax parcel 09-29-233-014. A plat of vacation and legal description of the subject property are in the addenda of this report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The legal description of the subject property is contained in the plat of right-of-way vacation presented in the addenda of this report. OWNERSHIP AND SALES HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY According to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice promulgated by the Appraisal Institute, it is necessary to report and analyze any prior sales, asking prices, contracts or other activity concerning the subject property being appraised for at least the past three years. The subject property is owned by the City of Des Plaines. Reportedly, the owner of the adjacent property located at 1864 Illinois Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 is interested in purchasing the subject property for assemblage with the existing single-family residence. No other information was furnished or uncovered by the appraiser regarding asking prices, offers, options, sales or pending sale contracts for the subject property in the past three years. CLIENT, INTENDED USE AND INTENDED USER The Client is the City of Des Plaines, who contacted and engaged the appraiser. The Intended User of the appraisal is the City of Des Plaines. The Intended Use of the appraisal is for disposition decisions by the City of Des Plaines. Other parties that may receive a copy of the appraisal or review the report do not become intended user(s) or Client of the appraisal. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The subject property is not leased. The property rights appraised includes the fee simple estate. Covenants, restrictions, and easements of record or proposed known to the appraiser and described in this report are reflected in the valuation of the subject property. Attachment 4 Page 11 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE Fee simple estate is defined as an “Absolute ownership interest unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat.” (Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, 2022). Covenants, restrictions, easement reported or uncovered by the appraiser and described in this report are reflected in the and in the valuation of the subject property. OWNERSHIP INTEREST APPRAISED The 100% ownership interest is appraised for the subject property. TYPE AND DEFINITION OF VALUE The client requested my opinion of market value of the subject property. Market value is a type of value, stated as an opinion, that presumes the transfer of a property (i.e., a right of ownership or a bundle of such rights), as of a certain date, under specific conditions set forth in the applicable definition of the term. The most applicable definition of value selected by the appraiser is the definition of market value used by agencies that regulate federally insured financial institutions in the United States. This definition of market value is: “The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition are the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1.Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2.Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; 3.A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4.Payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5.The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.” (Source: 12 C.F.R. Part 34.42(g); 55 Federal Register 34696, August 24, 1990, as amended at 57 Federal Register 12202, April 9, 1992; 59 Federal Register 29499, June 7, 1994). Attachment 4 Page 12 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE APPRAISAL The type and extent of research and analyses performed for the appraisal, and the conditions of the appraisal are summarized as follows. 1. The appraiser made a physical inspection of the subject property and exterior viewing of the adjacent properties. An appraiser’s inspection is typically limited to those things readily observable without the use of special testing or equipment. An inspection by an appraiser is not the equivalent of an inspection by an inspection professional (e.g., a structural engineer or home inspector). 2.The appraiser gathered available and pertinent information concerning the subject property from the Client, subject property owner, the property inspection and available public records and databases. 3.The appraiser collected information concerning the market to identify factors and trends relevant to the valuation; 4.The appraiser investigated the sales history, ownership and taxes of the property; 5.The appraiser performed a market analysis and determined highest and best use as vacant and as improved; 6.The appraiser sourced market data from multiple listing services, assessor's office, and/or reputable market data publications; 7.The appraiser collected, confirmed and analyzed market information for use in the sales comparison approach to value. The cost or income approaches are not applicable for properties of the subject type. 8. The appraiser developed an opinion of market value using the sales comparison methods to value within the guidelines set forth in the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The exposure time was estimated for the subject property based on surveyed data. 9.The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the report, and any extraordinary assumptions or hypothetical conditions described in the letter of transmittal of this report that may affect the value conclusion 10.The scope of work is further defined and inclusive of the content and form of this report. REAL ESTATE & REAL PROPERTY Real estate is identified parcel or tract of land, including improvements, if any. (USPAP, 2020-2021 ed) and real property includes the interests, benefits, and rights inherent in the ownership of real estate. (USPAP, 2020-2021 ed.) The appraisal of the subject property includes the land, building, site improvements, and property rights associated with the fee simple estate subject to any leases, covenants, restrictions and easements described in this report. Attachment 4 Page 13 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible property or intangible assets are nonphysical assets, including but not limited to franchises, trademarks, patents, copyrights, goodwill, equities, securities, and contracts as distinguished from physical assets such as facilities and equipment (USPAP Definitions 2020-2021 ed.). The valuation does not include intangible assets. PERSONAL PROPERTY Personal Property is “any tangible or intangible article that is subject to ownership and not classified as real property, including identifiable tangible objects that are considered by the general public as being “personal,” such as furnishings, artwork, antiques, gems and jewelry, collectibles, machinery and equipment; and intangible property that is created and stored electronically such as plans for installation art, choreography, emails, or designs for digital tokens” (USPAP Definitions 2020-2021 ed.). The appraisal does not include value for personal property. TYPE OF REPORT The report has been prepared under the Appraisal Report option of Standards Rule 2-2) of USPAP. As such, it contains summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that are used in the appraisal process whereas supporting documentation is retained in my file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and the intended use of the appraisal. DISCLOSURE OF COMPETENCY Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS is aware of the competency provision of USPAP and meet their standards. The appraiser has prior experience in similar properties the Chicago Metropolitan area, including the subject area, and is competent to complete the assignment. Refer to the appraiser’s qualifications in the Addenda. Attachment 4 Page 14 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. REGIONAL MAP Attachment 4 Page 15 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS Source: Appraisal Institute Attachment 4 Page 16 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. LOCATION MAP Attachment 4 Page 17 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. MARKET AREA DESCRIPTION Location The subject property is located in City of Des Plaines, a northwest suburb located 28 miles northwest of Chicago's central business district. Transportation and Access The subject property has good access to major streets and expressways, and O’Hare International Airport. The downtown district of the City of Des Plaines is 1.5 miles north of the subject property. Demographic Profile The market area is comprised of middle-income households. The population is forecast to remain fairly stable in the market areas over the next five years. Population 1 Mile 2 Mile 3 Mile 2010 Population 16,283 45,853 102,862 2023 Population 15,836 46,428 104,119 2028 Population Projection 15,764 46,581 104,460 Annual Growth 2010-2023 -0.2%0.1% 0.1% Annual Growth 2023-2028 -0.1%0.1% 0.1% Median Age 39.7 43.6 42.4 Bachelor's Degree or Higher 26%36% 38% Households 2023 Households 5,126 18,610 39,693 Annual Growth 2023-2028 -0.1%0.1% 0.1% Avg. Household Income $93,679 $97,145 $104,732 Median Household Income $76,211 $76,918 $78,159 2023 Avg HH Vehicles: 2 2 2 Housing Median Home Value: $271,639 $279,827 $299,245 Median Year Built: 1959 1964 1965 Source: CoStar, Inc. Daytime Employment The economic base of the surrounding suburban areas - including Elk Grove industrial parks – comprise retail, industrial, offices, and hotel. According to CoStar Data, located within three-mile radius of the subject property are 7,131 businesses employing 79,158 persons. Attachment 4 Page 18 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Services The City of Des Plaines provides an array of community services, public parks, and community centers, and recreation centers. Housing Prices The chart below, developed from the MRED MLS database, illustrates the trend in the median sale price for single-family homes in the City of Des Plaines and in the entire Chicago market area. More specific details of the market over are presented in a later section of this report. Uses The subject property is located in a residential area comprised of single family homes. The area is 100% developed with little land available for new construction. The South Elementary School and Arndt Park are proximate to the subject property. The residential base of the immediate area is typically comprised of ranch and split-level style homes priced in the range of $275,000 to $400,000. Attachment 4 Page 19 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. LOCATION SATELLITE VIEWS Attachment 4 Page 20 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. OVERVIEW OF DES PLAINES SINGLE-FAMILY MARKET Presented below and on the next pages are charts developed from the MRED MLS database that illustrate the market activity and prices for single-family homes in the City of Des Plaines and the entire north shore market area. While interest rates have increased significantly during the past year, the low inventory and prevailing demand have supported home prices. Attachment 4 Page 21 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Attachment 4 Page 22 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Attachment 4 Page 23 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Attachment 4 Page 24 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. AERIAL VIEWS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Source: Cook Viewer 2022 Source: Cook Viewer April 7, 2023 image date Attachment 4 Page 25 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. PLAT OF VACATION FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY Source: Excerpt of Plat of Right of Way Vacation, refer to full plat in addenda. Attachment 4 Page 26 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAP Attachment 4 Page 27 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Land Area: 1,875 SF Measurements: 15’ x 125’ Source of Land Area: Calculated from dimensions on Plat of Right of Way Vacation Frontage and Access: The subject property has frontage on Illinois Street and an existing concrete-paved public alley. The subject property does not have any driveway access. Utilities: All public and municipal utilities (including water, sewer, electric, natural gas, cable, internet, and telephone) are available to the subject property. Topography/Ravine: The site is generally level at street grade and grade of the adjacent paved alley. Flood Community Panel #: Map Panel: 17031C0219J, effective on 8/19/2008 Flood Zone: Zone X, area of minimal flooding Flood Insurance: Typically is typically not required in zone X Adjacent Lands: Single family residential to the north, south and east, and paved public alley adjacent to the west. Wetland Areas: None observed Environmental Hazards: Environmental evaluation is beyond my scope of expertise. A qualified engineer should be consulted on this matter. The scope of work does not include an investigation of any adverse environmental conditions. Ground Stability: The appraiser was not furnished a soil analysis. The appraisal assumes that the soil’s load bearing capacity is sufficient to support structures based on surrounding development. Covenants, Restrictions and Easements: No easements or restrictions exist, or are proposed to be imposed upon sale of the subject property, except for service walk encroachment of 1482 Prospect Avenue and storm sewer, described below. Improvements: The subject property is improved with a section of a concrete service walk that is part of residential property located at 1482 Prospect Avenue (refer to Plat of Right of Way Vacation for illustration). The subject property also appears to be improved with a wood fence that is part of 1864 Illinois Street. The subject property also appears to be improved with a 16” storm sewer as indicated on the Attachment 4 Page 28 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Plat of Right of Way Vacation. Other improvements include lawn and a tree. Real Estate Taxes: The subject property is not assessed for taxes. The 2022 tax rate for this district is 8.801%. Residential properties have an assessment level of 10% of value, and the 2022 equalization factor is 2.9237. Adjacent Properties: The side yard of 1864 Illinois Street appears to be integrated with the subject property. 1864 Illinois Street is a three-bedroom split level residence containing 1,275 SF above-grade and a two car garage accessed from the rear alley. The site for this property has 6,250 square feet. The assessor’s opinion of value of this property is $300,010 with $46,880 in value allocated to the land. This property was purchased in February 2023 for a price of $325,000 after being exposed to the market for 137 days in the MRED MLS. The rear yards of three adjacent single-family properties located at 1886 Illinois Street, 1486 Prospect Avenue and 1482 Prospect Avenue back up to the subject property. The home at 1482 Prospect sold in June 2016 for $250,000 after being exposed to the market for 5 days in the MRED MLS. There are no recent sales of 1886 Illinois Street or 1486 Prospect Avenue. Attachment 4 Page 29 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ZONING MAP Source: Excerpt of City of Des Plaines Zoning Map Attachment 4 Page 30 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ZONING INFORMATION Jurisdiction: City of Des Plaines Designation: R-1, Family Residence District. Purpose / Permitted Uses: The purpose of the R-1 Single-Family Residential District is to provide for and preserve single-family residential environments at the lowest density within the City. Single family uses are permitted in the R-1 district. The property adjacent to the north of the subject property at 1864 Illinois Street is zoned R-3, Townhouse Residential, by the City of Des Plaines. The bulk regulations for residential districts in Des Plaines and other pertinent zoning regulations are presented below. Bulk Controls R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Maximum height 21/2 stories to 35 ft. 21/2 stories to 35 ft. 45 ft. 80 ft. Minimum front yard 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 12 ft. Minimum side yard 5 ft. 5 ft. Buildings 35 ft. and under: 5 ft. Over 35 ft.: 10 ft. 5 ft., plus 2 ft. for every 10 ft. over 40 ft. Minimum rear yard 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings 35 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 35 ft.: 30 ft. Buildings 40 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 40 ft.: 25 ft., plus 2 ft. for every 10 ft. over 40 ft. Maximum rear yard coverage 60%1 n/a n/a n/a Minimum lot width: Interior 55 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. 50 ft. Corner 65 ft. 55 ft. 55 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot area: Interior 6,875 sq. ft. 2,800 sq. ft. per DU 2,800 sq. ft. per DU 10,000 sq. ft.2 Corner 8,125 sq. ft. 6,875 sq. ft. 2,800 sq. ft. per DU 10,000 sq. ft.2 Maximum building coverage: Interior 30% 30% n/a n/a Corner 35% 35% n/a n/a Minimum corner side yard 10 ft.3 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. Attachment 4 Page 31 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Where a lot is defined as a corner lot, the required front yard and corner side yard shall be observed; provided, however, that the minimum corner side yard may be reduced to allow for a buildable width of thirty feet (30') for a single family detached dwelling unit in the R-1 district. In no instance shall the minimum corner side yard setback be reduced to less than five feet (5'). No accessory building or roofed structure shall encroach into the required front yard and corner side yard setback; except where permitted by zoning, provided, however, structures and buildings lawfully established prior to June 17, 2019 that do not meet the front yard or corner side yard setbacks shall be considered legal non-conforming and may remain and be maintained pursuant to section 5-6 of the zoning ordinance. Number Of Bedrooms Minimum Lot Area (Square Feet) Efficiency dwelling unit 600 1 bedroom 700 2 bedrooms 800 3 bedrooms 1,000 More than 3 bedrooms 1,500 12-5-4: Nonconforming Lots A.Single Nonconforming Lots Of Record: In any district in which single-family dwellings are permitted, a single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be erected on any single lot of record after the effective date hereof, notwithstanding provisions of this title governing minimum lot width and minimum lot area; provided, however, that yard dimensions and requirements other than those applying to area or width, or both, of the lot shall conform to the regulations for the district in which such lot is located. Such lot must be in separate ownership and not of continuous frontage with other lots in the same ownership. (Ord. Z-6-15, 1-21-2015) B.Lots In Combination: If two (2) or more lots or a combination of lots with continuous frontage in single ownership are of record at the effective date hereof, and if all or part of the lots with no buildings do not meet the requirements established for lot width and area, the lands involved shall be considered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this title; and no portion of said parcel shall be used or sold in a manner which diminishes compliance with lot width and area requirements established by this title, nor shall any division of any parcel be made which creates a lot with width or area below the requirements stated in this title. C.Other Uses of Legal Nonconforming Lots: In any commercial or manufacturing zoning district, a legal nonconforming lot of record may be used for any use permitted in the district. (Ord. Z-8-98, 9-21-1998) Conformance to Zoning The subject property is not a legal lot of record, and it does not meet the bulk requirements for a separate buildable lot. The subject property has potential to be assembled with adjacent R-1 and or R-3 zoned properties for residential purposes. According to the City of Attachment 4 Page 32 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. Des Plaines ordinance code, whenever an owner of property abutting upon any street or alley proposes to have the same or any part thereof vacated, said owner shall file with the office of the director of community development an application for vacation. A filing fee for each application of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) shall be paid therewith in addition to a cash deposit of eight hundred dollars ($800.00). The applicant shall be responsible to pay the actual cost of an appraisal which may be ordered by the corporate authorities to determine the value of the street or alley proposed to be vacated. The eight hundred dollar ($800.00) deposit shall be credited toward the actual cost of the appraisal fee and any excess amount above the actual cost shall be returned to the applicant or the applicant shall pay any additional amount above the eight hundred dollars ($800.00) to the City. (Ord. M- 14-05, 5-16-2005) Attachment 4 Page 33 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSES The development of an opinion of market value first requires a determination of highest and best use, founded on the forces of supply and demand. The highest and best use of the property must be determined for both the subject property as though vacant, and for the property as currently improved (if applicable). The highest and best use must meet the following criteria: 1.Legally permissible under the zoning laws and other restrictions that apply to the property, with consideration of reasonable probability of zoning. 2.Physically possible given the property size and characteristics. 3.Financially feasible, or those uses that are legally and physically possible and also produce a positive return on investment. 4.The particular use (or class of uses) that pass the first three criteria and also produce the highest net return on investment relative to risk are the maximally productive and highest and best use of the property, which then becomes the basis of the market value estimate. Highest and Best Use Conclusions Due to size and zoning restrictions, the subject property is non-buildable independently. As a site not able to be developed independently, the highest and best use of the subject property is determined to be for extra yard space serving adjacent single-family residences, particularly for the property at 1864 Illinois which shares a side lot line and can benefit most from the extra yard space through assemblage. In addition, the property at 1864 Illinois is zoned R-3 Townhouse Residential, and with assemblage with the subject property it may have potential to accommodate an additional dwelling unit depending upon zoning approvals. Attachment 4 Page 34 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. VALUATION METHODOLOGY There are basically three methods in estimating the market value of non-buildable parcels of the subject type described below. Sales Comparison Approach (Method One): This method is the conventional sales comparison approach to value. This method derives an opinion of value based on sales of comparable properties. The market value for the subject property is characterized by prices paid for non-buildable sites in which there was also a limited market. The appraiser discovered several sales of non-buildable single-family parcels of land that are considered in the valuation of the subject property. Discount to Buildable Land (Method Two): This method provides an estimate of value by applying a market-derived discount to the going rate of buildable land in the location of the subject property. This method first establishes the value of a buildable lot in the location of the subject location, and then a market derived discount is applied to reflect the fact that the value of non-buildable land is less marketable and has less market value than a buildable lot. The discounted unit price would then be applied to the subject parcel resulting in its market value. Before and After Assemblage (Method Three): Before and After valuations of the adjacent property or properties and subject property as assembled are developed using sales comparison in order to indicate the increment in value associated with assemblage. This value method relies on sales of two residential properties similar in all respects except for lot size. The difference in sale price would reflect how much the extra land contributed to price due to enhancement of more yard or land to accommodate a building addition. An analysis of several paired sales would indicate the value enhancement after assemblage. The appraiser attempted this method of analysis; however, due to the diversity of residential styles and sacristy of recent comparable home sales within the subject market area, the integrity of any matched pair analysis is compromised and therefore not meaningful enough to provide a credible indication of value. A matched paired analysis in this case would require too many qualitative adjustments to the comparable sales in order to make them similar enough to extract any value attributed to more land area. Furthermore, this analysis would not necessarily reflect the effects of a restrictive market on the value. Therefore, this method of analysis was not used in this appraisal. Reconciliation Methods One and Two are used in the appraisal of the subject property. The results of each method are reconciled to a final indication of market value. Method One, which is the conventional sales comparison approach, is presented first followed by Method Two analysis. Limited market discounts of non-buildable properties are estimated in the sales comparison approach, which is applied in the Method Two analysis. Attachment 4 Page 35 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUE (METHOD ONE) The sales comparison approach to value is a process of comparing prices paid for similar properties that have sold, listed or pending. Comparisons are made of the terms and dates of the sales, their locations and physical characteristics. Dissimilarities of the properties being compared to the subject are evaluated and the sums added or subtracted from their prices. Some unit of comparison, such as price per square foot, price per room, or gross income multiplier (GIM) is used. The steps taken to apply the sales comparison approach, as outlined in the Appraisal of Real Estate 15th Edition, are as follows: 1.Research the competitive market for information on properties that have sold, are listed for sale or are under contract. In selecting the data, consideration is made for such characteristics as property type, date of sale, size, location and use. The selected sales should attract a buyer who would also consider purchasing the subject property; 2.Verify the information about the sales so market comparison to the subject property is credible; 3.Select the most relevant unit of comparison that best explains market behavior and variance in sales prices; 4.Consider the various elements of comparison and adjust the sale prices of the selected data to equate them to the subject property; 5.If applicable, reconcile the various indicators of value provided by the adjusted prices into a single value indication for the subject property. The comparison analysis is made based on total sale price and price per square foot of land area. The following sale data are presented as the best indicators of value for the subject property as a non-buildable site for independent residential use. Data sources include CoStar, Loop Net, MRED MLS, buyers, sellers, brokers, appraiser files, and available public records. Attachment 4 Page 36 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DETAILS OF SALES DATA Data No. Property Type Address Tax Number Sale Date Document # Deed Type Approx. Land SF Frontage feet Zoning Flood or wetland Sale Price Discount Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. 1 Non-Buildable Parcel 1918 Noyes Street Evanston, IL 10-12-319-004 05/2019 1916855074 Warranty Deed 2,475 SF 16.50 feet Single-Family R-3 None $20,000 ≈ 80% $8.08 Non-buildable parcel (16.50’ x 150’) due to restrictive size, purchased by a speculative purchaser prospecting to assemble adjacent excess land on 1916 Noyes for creation of a buildable lot of 32’ x 150’ for single-family development. Seller reported price was heavily discounted due to the parcel being non-buildable. The seller acquired the property from a tax sale. Original asking price started at $37,000 in August 2018. Existing homes in this immediate market area are priced in the range of $650,000 and new homes over $1 million. Seller indicated that the lot as assembled could be worth around $200,000, or $41/SF. The indicated discount on this sale associated with its limited market is estimated to be ≈ 80% (($8.08÷$41)-1). 2 Non-Buildable Parcel 224 Glenview Road Glenview, IL 05-31-304-028 01/2018 1803042018 Special Warranty Deed 2,500 SF 25 feet Single Family R-5 None $27,000 ≈ 70% $10.80 Non-buildable parcel (25’ x 100’) due to restrictive size purchased by an adjacent single-family owner at 200 Glenview Road for extra yard. The parcel was already landscaped. The original asking price was $29,500 in November 2017. The seller acquired the property from a tax sale. The buyer paid prorated taxes, survey and title report, which are typically provided by the seller. Existing homes in this immediate market area are priced in the range of $325,000 and new homes priced over $1 million. Buildable single-family lots (typically quarter acre in size) are priced in the range of $35/SF in this market. The indicated discount on this sale associated with its limited market is estimated to be ≈ 70%. 3 Non-Buildable Parcel 21762 N. Montgomery Rd. P.O. Deerfield, IL 16-30-201-008 Closed date was 12/2016 per doc. 7359634; contract date was 11-2014. Warranty Deed 26,897 SF 140 feet Single Family R-1 75% flood hazard and 100% Cook County Wetland $30,000 ≈ 80% $1.12 Property sold as a non-buildable parcel due to flood hazard and wetland, located in unincorporated Cook County with a Deerfield post office address. Well and septic is required. The property is divided by a branch of the Chicago River and it backs to I-294. The parcel was originally marketed for sale in May 2013 with an asking price of $150,000, reduced to $99,000 in May 2014, before selling for $30,000. The seller inherited the property. The buyer was a speculator, prospecting on completing flood hazard and wetland mitigation in order to make the lot buildable. The property was sold on contract for deed with $10,000 down and $10,000 per year for the remainder of the sale price, with the option to terminate the final two payments depending upon buyer’s due diligence regarding the potential of the parcel. A FEMA map amendment was filed in May 2016. The sale was recorded in December 2016 with a sale price indicated to be $30,000. The parcel is still vacant. The property is located in an area of existing homes priced in the range of $500,000, new homes priced over $1,000,000, and half-acre buildable lots not backing to I-294 priced in range $200,000 (≈ $10/SF.) The sale price of Data 3 compared to the original asking price reflects a discount of ≈ 80%. 4 Non-Buildable Parcel Adj. to 320 Springside Ln Buffalo Grove, IL 15-32-306-002 09/2023 7998670 Special Warranty Deed 16,936 SF No street frontage Single Family None $22,000 ≈ 90% $1.30 This property is landlocked and improved with yard, in-ground pool and storage building. It was purchased for assemblage with adjacent single-family property at 320 Springs Road, which sold for $405,000 in September 2023. The property was marketed for sale in the MRED MLS for 57 days with an asking price of $49,900. Buildable lots in this area are priced in the range of $200,000. The sale price of Data 4 compared to the buildable lots in this market is estimated to be ≈ 90%. Attachment 4 Page 37 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DETAILS OF SALES & LISTING DATA, CONTINUED Data No. Property Type Address Tax number Sale Date Document # Approx. Land SF Frontage feet Zoning Flood or wetland Sale Price Discount Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. 5 Non-Buildable Parcel Adj. to 100 E. North Avenue Lake Bluff, IL 12-21-107-052 02/2020 7634298 2011 sale Quit Claim Deed 699 SF 1.7 feet Single Family R-4 None $5,000 ≈ 80% $7.15 Non-buildable parcel due to restrictive size purchased by an adjacent single-family owner at 100 E. North Avenue with land of 67’ x 125’ for additional side yard and conformance to maximum lot coverage for construction of a larger patio. The parcel was already landscaped and it was encumbered with a public sidewalk. The property was sold by the Village of Lake Bluff. The sale was recorded in February 2020, but the sale price was determined and approved in 2011 according to the Village of Lake Bluff administrator. Existing homes in this immediate market area are priced in the range of $600,000 and new homes over $1 million. A vacant 75’ x 125’ site at 335 E. North Avenue sold in October 2012 for $350,000, or $37/SF. The indicated discount on this non-buildable Data 5 with its limited market is estimated to be ≈ 80%. 6 Non-Buildable Parcel 2800 Techny Road Northbrook, IL 04-17-421-012 06/2023 2317357105 Warranty Deed 30,579 SF 200 feet Single Family R-4 None $14,000 ≈ 96% $0.46 Non-buildable Outlot A of the Woodmere single-family subdivision designated for stormwater detention serving 23 homes in the Woodmere subdivision in accordance with the agreement recorded as document number 86487429. The parcel has landscaping, fencing, and stormwater detention basin. The property was available for sale for $25,000 in November 2019, down from an original asking price of $199,000 in February 2019. The listing was active in January 31, 2023 with an asking price of $16,000 or $0.52/SF. Existing homes in Woodmere were typically priced in the range of $750,000 in 2020, with lot sizes typically containing one-third acre. This property sold for $14,000 in June 2023 or $0.46/SF by GT Alternatives LLC to a person who is not an adjacent owner. Existing homes in Woodmere are typically priced in the range of $750,000 with lot sizes typically containing one-third acre. A buildable single-family lot at 2825 Walters, Northbrook sold in July 2017 for $330,000 or $11/SF. The indicated discount on this non-buildable offering with its limited market is estimated to be ≈ 96%. 7 Non-Buildable Parcel Next to 268 Graceland Ave. Des Plaines, IL 09-17-206-041 10/2023 Not recorded yet 3,951 SF 135 feet Townhouse R-3 100% in AE Flood Hazard $6,000 ≈ 92% $1.52 This was marketed as a non-buildable parcel. The property was purchased at a tax sale and subsequently marketed for sale in the MRED MLS with asking price of $17,900. The property is located in an AE 100-year flood hazard. It was partly improved with a private street. Its highest and best use is for assemblage with adjacent property for yard space. The R-3 zoned lot of 6,000 SF at 368 Graceland is on the market for $19.83/SF. The discount on this non-buildable parcel with its limited market and use is estimated to be ≈ 92%. 8 Non-Buildable Parcel 205 Royal Ct. Prospect Heights, IL 03-21-140-047 06/2023 2315845078 Warranty Deed 24,568 SF 55 feet Single Family R-1 None $5,500 ≈ 97% $0.22 Non-buildable Outlot A of the Lancaster single-family subdivision designated as open space, improved with a shallow stormwater management basin serving several homes in the subdivision, reported to be not buildable according to the Village of Prospect Heights. The parcel has landscaping and lawn area. The seller, GT Alternatives, LLC, acquired the property at a tax sale. The property was then marketed in the MRED MLS, originally for $140,000 as a buildable site, and then gradually reduced to $9,000 reflecting restrictive market and use. Existing homes in Lancaster subdivision are priced in the range of $500,000 with lot sizes typically containing one-half acre. The seller reported that buildable lots in the market area are priced in the range of $150,000. The indicated discount on this non-buildable parcel with its limited market and use is estimated to be ≈ 97%. It sold not to an adjacent owner but speculator on a future use. Attachment 4 Page 38 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DETAILS OF SALES DATA, CONTINUED Data No. Property Type Address Tax number Sale Date Document # Approx. Land SF Frontage feet Zoning Flood or wetland Sale Price Discount Sale Price Per Sq. Ft. 9 Non-Buildable Parcel Adj. To 427 S. Garfield Tr. Lombard, IL 06-08-307-016 July 2015 R2015-083773 Trustee deed 29,375 SF No street frontage Single Family R-2 None $10,000 ≈ 93% $0.34 Non-buildable and landlocked site purchased by adjacent owner at 427 S. Garfield Terrace for yard space and construction of a shed. The site was already graded and has several trees. The property sold through the MRED MLS. The property is located in single-family area with existing homes priced in the range of $250,000 to $600,000 depending upon age and size. A similar-sized buildable parcel located at 421 S. Martha Street in Lombard was assessed in 2015 with land value of $140,000, or $4.77. Based on assessed values for similar-sized buildable sites in this market, the indicated discount on this non-buildable parcel with its limited market and use is estimated to be ≈ 93%. 10 Non-Buildable Parcel Next to 1033 Wade Street Highland Park, IL 16-25-309-002 May 1989 2796326 Warranty deed 2,021 SF 15 feet Single Family R-5 None $2,711 ≈ 90% $1.34 Non-buildable parcel sold by Lake County to Mr. and Mrs. Ross who owned the adjacent residential property for purposes of assemblage and new house construction. The parcel has 800 SF (40%) in a ravine/Steep Slope Zone. The adjacent site at 1033 Wade Street had 16,980 SF, of which 50% of the site is in a ravine/Steep Slope Zone. The assembled site of 19,001 SF was improved with an older residence. The property sold, as assembled, for $300,000 ($15.78/SF) in July 1997 and then in 1999 the existing residence was razed and the land improved with a new single-family residence containing 4,740 SF plus basement of 2,336 SF, which then sold in April 2013 for $1,225,000 and then for $1,025,000 in July 2019 (reflecting declining market in the interim). The average home sale price in Highland Park was $222,000 in 1988-1989, compared to $323,000 in 1997-1998, and $544,000 in 2019-2020. The sale price of Data 7, adjusting for housing market conditions, is estimated to reflect a discount of ≈ 90% from the price for a buildable lot in this location in 1989. 11 Non-Buildable Parcel Next to 207 Woodland Rd. Highland Park, IL No tax number April 2021 7807113 Warranty deed 6,221 SF 33 feet Single Family R-5 None $15,000 ≈ 80% $2.41 The property consists of a section of dedicated right-of-way of Woodland Road (adjacent to the single-family residential property located at 207 Woodland Road, Des Plaines, IL) containing net land area of 6,225 SF. The subject property is improved with an existing driveway and landscaping associated with 207 Woodland Road, and the subject property is encumbered with utility easements. The subject property is non-buildable as a standalone property due to its restrictive size. The subject property was vacated by the City of Highland Park assembled with the adjacent property at 207 Woodland Road. Approximately 33% of the subject property is in a ravine/Steep Slope Zone. The property at 207 Woodland has land area of 22,971 SF. The property was assembled with 207 Woodland Road for purposes of continued use as yard area and driveway. Finished lots in the range of 30,000 SF located in this market area were estimated to be priced in the range of $11.50/SF, indicating a discount of ≈ 80% from the price for a buildable lot in this location. Recording information was not available. The sale price and information was verified with the purchaser. 12 Non-Buildable Parcel To rear of 2202-2206 Chestnut St. Northbrook, IL No tax number 12/2022 Per Ord. 22 1,200 SF 10 feet Single Family R-5 None $4,800 ≈ 91% $4.00 The property consists of a section of dedicated unimproved alley 10’ x 120’ adjacent to 2202 and 2206 Chestnut Street with 10 feet of frontage on Greenbrier Lane purchased by the adjacent owner to accommodate a larger home addition. The lot containing 7,500 SF at 2215 Chestnut was purchased in February 2014 for $350,000 and the old house was subsequently razed. The property was vacated by the Village of Northbrook with retention of rights to use the land for utilities after assemblage per ordinance 22. The sale price was based on an independent appraisal. Buildable single-family lots in this market area are priced in the range of $45/SF. Attachment 4 Page 39 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. OVERVIEWS OF SALES & LISTING DATA 1 DATA 2 DATA 3 DATA 4 DATA 5 DATA 6 Attachment 4 Page 40 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. OVERVIEWS OF SALES, CONTINUED DATA 7 DATA 8 DATA 9 DATA 10 DATA 11 DATA 12 Attachment 4 Page 41 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. ANALYSIS AND ADJUSTMENT OF SALES DATA No two properties are equal and their prices vary due to differences in transactional factors (e.g., property rights, sale conditions and market conditions) and property factors (e.g., location and physical characteristics). Adjustments are made to the price of each comparable property for differences; the adjustment process is intended to make the comparable equal to the subject property as of the date of value. Adjustments are explained below. Real Property Rights Conveyed Property rights refer to the interest being conveyed such as fee simple estate, leased fee estate, leasehold interest, or partial interest and also considers covenants, restrictions and easements. Data 5, 6, 7 and 8 have restrictive easements, warranting upward adjustment compared to the property rights being appraised for the subject property. Financing Terms An adjustment for financing is applied to a property that transfers with atypical financing such as a seller installment contract carrying a favorable interest rate or terms that inflated the purchase price. Conversely, interest rates at above-market levels can result in lower sale prices. Such atypical financing can cause the sale price to not be representative of market value, and in such cases require an adjustment. Data 3 sold with seller financing and an option to terminate the remaining payments based on the buyer’s due diligence regarding the potential of the sites for development, warranting downward adjustment. No other adjustments are required for financing terms. Conditions of Sale This adjustment relates to the particular motivation of the buyer or seller in which the sale price is not reflective of an arms-length transaction or particular motivations of the buyer or seller in which the price is not reflective of market value. None of the sales is an REO or short sales. All of the sales are non-buildable parcels purchased by an adjacent owner for assemblage or a speculative buyer. All of the data reflect significant discounts reflecting their limited marketability and use. No other adjustments are warranted for unusual sale conditions of the sale. Market Conditions (Date of sale) The real estate market is not static. Prices for real estate normally change over time due to fluctuations in supply and demand. Changes in market conditions can be caused by periods of economic recession or expansion, availability of financing, change in tax laws, building cycles, and investor’s perceptions of current and future market conditions. Adjustments are made to the comparable when prices have appreciated or depreciated Attachment 4 Page 42 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. between the effective date of the appraisal and the sale date of a comparable. Adjustments are made for market conditions (dates of sale) compared to market conditions as of the effective date of value for the subject property. The adjustments for market conditions are estimated based on changes in home price levels in their respective markets. Location Adjustments are made when the location of a comparable that are different from those of the subject property in terms of supply and demand, price levels, access to public transportation and expressways, traffic exposure, linkage to amenities and other location characteristics that affect value. Adjustments are made for differences in location of the data compared to the location of the subject property. Physical Characteristics & Other Adjustments Adjustments are considered for major physical differences between the subject property and the comparables in terms of 100-year flood hazard, wetland, ravine amenity, frontage, land size, site improvements and any extraordinary costs of assemblage and/or use. VALUE INDICATIONS BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH (METHOD ONE) The data range in price from $0.22/SF to $10.80/SF. The average price per square foot is $3.23 and the median price per square foot is $1.42/SF. Based on analysis and adjustment to the sales, and considering the location, characteristics of the subject property and current market conditions, my opinion of value is $3,000 by the sales comparison approach, equating to $1.60/SF of land area. Attachment 4 Page 43 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. DISCOUNT TO BUILDABLE LAND (METHOD TWO) The sales and listing cited in the previous section have prices ranging from $2,711 to $30,000 and from $0.22 to $10.80 per square foot of land area. The data are non- buildable parcels that have restrictive uses and markets. The sale prices are estimated to have been discounted from 70% to 96%, and the median discount equates to 90% compared to prices of independently buildable single-family lots in their respective locations. Prices for independently buildable lots in Des Plaines are summarized in the table below. The average price is $111,738 and the average lot size is 9,532 SF. The prices range from $7.77 to $19.83 per square foot. Larger sites tend to sell for less per square foot than their smaller counterparts. The price range is also due to differences in market conditions, zoning, location, and frontage/lot width. Adjustments are made for differences compared to the subject property. Sale #Address Sale Date Sale Price Demo needed Lot Size (SF) Flood Hazard Zoning Frontage $/SF 1 2101 Douglas Ave Sep-22 $125,000 None 10,065 None R-1 66' $12.42 2 1055 Walter Ave Nov-22 $65,000 none 7,100 None R-1 50' $9.15 3 1356 E. Lincoln Ave Nov-21 $90,000 none 11,580 None R-1 60' $7.77 4 2268 Douglas St.Jun-21 $125,000 None 9,999 None R-1 65' $12.50 5 2169 Elmira Ave.Jul-20 $110,000 None 10,934 None R-1 71' $10.06 6 1754 Pratt St.Apr-19 $110,000 None 9,000 None R-1 50' $12.22 7 1352 E. Lincoln Ave.Asking $149,900 None 11,580 None R-1 60' $12.94 8 368 Graceland Ave.Asking $119,000 None 6,000 None R-3 48' $19.83 PRICES FOR BUILDABLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOTS IN DES PLAINES Smaller sites tend to sell for higher price per square foot compared to their larger counterparts due to greater demand for smaller sites. Based on the cite data, and considering the location and features of the subject property, my opinion of value as if buildable independently is $11/SF for the subject property. Based on price discounts estimated from non-buildable single-family lots previously presented, the limited-market discount applicable to the subject property and market area is estimated to be 85% indicating a market value of $3,100 for the subject property by this methodology (1,875 SF x $11/SF x 15%). Attachment 4 Page 44 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. RECONCILIATION OF MARKET VALUE The range of indicated value by the presented two methodologies is $3,000 to $3,100. Both methods are considered in the final reconciliation. Based upon my investigation, analyses and experience, my opinion of market value for the subject property is as follows. Premise Estate Effective Date Value Market Value Fee Simple October 16, 2023 $3,000 MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION The value conclusion is subject to the general assumptions and limiting conditions contained in the attached report. The value conclusion is also subject to the following extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions that may affect the assignment result. 1.Refer to any statements contained in the letter of transmittal of this report. EXPOSURE TIME Appraisal standards require the appraiser to form an opinion of the exposure time applicable to the conclusion of market value for subject property. Exposure time, is defined by USPAP, is “an opinion, based on supporting market data, of the length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal”. Exposure time is presumed to take place prior to the effective date of value. Properties of the subject type have typically been purchased by an adjacent owner, or speculator. The sales of non-buildable sites presented in this report that were exposed to the market in MRED MLS sold typically within 18 months. My opinion of exposure time for the subject property at the concluded market value is up to 18 months. Attachment 4 Page 45 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1.The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2.The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3.I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4.I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or the parties involved with this assignment. 5.My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 6.My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 7.My analyses, opinions, and conclusions have been developed, and this report has been prepared, in compliance with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, and in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). 8.Nicholas F. Solano has made a personal inspection of the property. 9.Nicholas F. Solano has performed no services as an appraiser or any other services regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the agreement to perform this assignment. 10.No one has provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. 11.This appraisal is not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. 12.The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 13.As of the date of this appraisal, Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS, has completed the requirements of the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. Nicholas F. Solano, MAI, FRICS IL Certified General Real Estate Appraiser #553.000268, Exp. 09/30/2025 Attachment 4 Page 46 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal is based on the following general assumptions and limiting conditions, except as otherwise noted in the report. 1.The title is marketable and free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, encroachments, easements and restrictions. The property is under responsible ownership and competent management and is available for its highest and best use. 2.There are no existing judgments or pending or threatened litigation that could affect the value of the property. 3.There are no hidden or undisclosed conditions of the land or of the improvements that would render the property more or less valuable. Furthermore, there is no asbestos in the property. 4.The revenue stamps placed on any deed referenced herein to indicate the sale price of a comparable are in correct relation to the actual dollar amount of the transaction. 5.The property is in compliance with all applicable building, environmental, zoning, and other federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. 6.The conclusions stated in my appraisal apply only as of the effective date of the appraisal, and no representation is made as to the effect of subsequent events. 7.No changes in any federal, state or local laws, regulations or codes (including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code) are anticipated. 8.Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, I am not required to give testimony, respond to any subpoena or attend any court, governmental or other hearing with reference to the property without compensation relative to such additional employment. 9.I have made no survey of the property and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or survey of the property included in this report is for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered to be scaled accurately for size. The appraisal covers the property as described in this report, and the areas and dimensions set forth are assumed to be correct. 10.No opinion is expressed as to the value of subsurface oil, gas or mineral rights, if any, and I have assumed that the property is not subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials, unless otherwise noted in my appraisal. 11.I accept no responsibility for considerations requiring expertise in such fields, but are not limited to, legal descriptions and other legal matters such as legal title, geologic considerations such as soils and seismic stability, and civil, mechanical, electrical, structural and other engineering and environmental matters. 12.The distribution of the total valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use of the property. The allocations of value for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. The appraisal report shall be considered only in Attachment 4 Page 47 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. its entirety. No part of the appraisal report shall be utilized separately or out of context. 13.Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute) shall be disseminated through advertising media, public relations media, news media or any other means of communication (including without limitation prospectuses, private offering memoranda and other offering material provided to prospective investors) without the prior written consent of the person signing the report. 14.Information, estimates and opinions contained in the report, obtained from third- party sources are assumed to be reliable and have not been independently verified. 15.Any income and expense estimates contained in the appraisal report are used only for the purpose of estimating value and do not constitute predictions of future operating results. 16.If the property is subject to one or more leases, any estimate of residual value contained in the appraisal may be particularly affected by significant changes in the condition of the economy, of the real estate industry, or of the appraised property at the time these leases expire or otherwise terminate. 17.No consideration has been given to personal property located on the premises or to the cost of moving or relocating such personal property; only the real property has been considered, unless otherwise noted in the appraisal. 18.The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. I have not made a specific survey or analysis of any property to determine whether the physical aspects of the improvements meet the ADA accessibility guidelines. In as much as compliance matches each owner’s financial ability with the cost to cure the non-conforming physical characteristics of a property, I cannot comment on compliance to ADA. Given that compliance can change with each owner’s financial ability to cure non-accessibility, the value of the subject does not consider possible non-compliance. A specific study of both the owner’s financial ability and the cost to cure any deficiencies would be needed for the Department of Justice to determine compliance. 19.No studies have been provided to the appraiser indicating the presence or absence of hazardous materials on the subject property or in the improvements, and my valuation is predicated upon the assumption that the subject property is free and clear of any environment hazards including, without limitation, hazardous wastes, toxic substances and mold. No representations or warranties are made regarding the environmental condition of the subject property and the person signing the report shall not be responsible for any such environmental conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because I am not an expert in the field of environmental conditions, the appraisal report cannot be considered as an environmental assessment of the Attachment 4 Page 48 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. subject property. The appraiser does not guarantee that the subject property is free of defects or environmental problems. 20.The person signing the report may have reviewed available flood maps and may have noted in the appraisal report whether the subject property is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. I am not qualified to detect such areas and therefore do not guarantee such determinations. The presence of flood plain areas and/or wetlands may affect the value of the property, and the value conclusion is predicated on the assumption that wetlands are non-existent or minimal. 21.The appraisal report and value conclusion assumes the satisfactory completion of construction, repairs or alterations in a workmanlike manner, if applicable for proposed construction. 22.It is expressly acknowledged that in any action which may be brought against the appraiser arising out of, relating to, or in any way pertaining to this engagement, the appraisal reports, or any estimates or information contained therein, the appraiser shall not be responsible or liable for an incidental or consequential damages or losses. 23.The use of the appraisal report by anyone other than the client is prohibited except as otherwise provided. Accordingly, the appraisal report is addressed to and shall be solely for the client’s use and benefit unless I provide my prior written consent. I expressly reserve the unrestricted right to withhold my consent to your disclosure of the appraisal report (or any part thereof including, without limitation, conclusions of value and my identity), to any third parties. Stated again for clarification, unless my prior written consent is obtained, no third party may rely on the appraisal report (even if their reliance was foreseeable). 24.Any prospective value opinions presented in this report are estimates and forecasts, which are prospective in nature and are subject to considerable risk and uncertainty. In addition to the contingencies noted in the preceding paragraph, several events may occur that could substantially alter the outcome of my estimates such as, but not limited to changes in the economy, interest rates, and capitalization rates, behavior of consumers, investors and lenders, fire and other physical destruction, changes in title or conveyances of easements and deed restrictions, etc. It is assumed that conditions reasonably foreseeable at the present time are consistent or similar with the future. 25.The comments by the licensed real estate appraiser contained within this appraisal report on the condition of the property do not address "standards of practice" as defined in the Home Inspector License Act [225 ILCS 441] and 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1410 and are not to be considered a home inspection or home inspection report. Attachment 4 Page 49 of 55 SECTION OF ALLEY ADJACENT TO 1864 ILLINOIS STREET, DES PLAINES, IL APPRAISAL REPORT Chicago Metro Realty Valuation Corp. PHOTOGRAPHS Attachment 4 Page 50 of 55 CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE M - 22 - 23 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC ALLEY AT 1864 ILLINOIS STREET.______ WHEREAS, Dinara Robles and Pekin Bayramli (collectively, the “Owners”) are the owners of the 6,313-square-foot parcel of real property commonly known as 1864 Illinois Street, Des Plaines, Illinois and assigned Property Identification Number of 09-29-223-014-0000 (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential District of the City (“R-1 District”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is improved with a single family residence, detached garage, paved driveway surface, and paved walkway surfaces (“Existing Development”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property abuts a 1,863-square-foot, unimproved portion of a City-owned, dedicated alley (“Vacation Parcel”), which Vacation Parcel is depicted on the plat of vacation, titled “Plat of Right-Of-Way Vacation,” prepared by Doland Engineering, LLC, and dated July 11, 2023, attached to and made a part of this Ordinance as Exhibit A (“Plat of Vacation”); and WHEREAS, the Owner has filed an application with City for the vacation of the Vacation Parcel; and WHEREAS, upon its vacation, the Vacation Parcel will become part of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City has determined the value of the Vacation Parcel to be $3,000.00; and WHEREAS, the City has the power to vacate the Vacation Parcel pursuant to Section 8-1-9 of the City Code of the City of Des Plaines, as amended (“City Code”), and Section 11-91-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-91-1 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the public interest will be served by vacating the Vacation Parcel, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that, upon the effective date of the vacation of the Vacation Parcel, title and sole responsibility of upkeep and maintenance shall vest in the then-owner of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the vacation of portions of the Rights-of-Way will not inhibit any currently existing street access for any parcel or tract dependent on the Rights-of- Way as its sole means of access; and Page 51 of 55 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the vacation of the Vacation Parcel in accordance with this Ordinance will serve and be in the best interest of the City and the public; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows; SECTION 1: RECITALS. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for the approval of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: JURISDICTION. The City Council does hereby certify that the Subject Property and the Vacation Parcel are located entirely within the corporate limits of the City of Des Plaines and are subject to the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. SECTION 3: VACATION. Subject to the conditions set forth in this Ordinance, and pursuant to Section 8-1-9 of the City Code and Section 11-91-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/11-91-1 et seq., the (i) Plat of Vacation; and (ii) vacation of the Vacation Parcel as depicted on the Plat of Vacation are hereby approved, subject to and contingent upon the following condition: the Plat of Vacation must be revised include the legal description of the Vacation Parcel. SECTION 4: OWNERSHIP AND ZONING. Upon the recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, as provided in this Ordinance, the vacated Vacation Parcel is to be incorporated into and made a part of the Subject Property, and title will vest with the then-owner of the Subject Property. Following recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, will be and remain a part of the Subject Property in the R-1 District, unless and until a plat of subdivision is approved by the City in accordance with all applicable state and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. Page 52 of 55 SECTION 5. COMPENSATION. The approval of the vacation as provided in Section 3 of this Ordinance is subject to and contingent upon payment by the Owners to the City of the fair market value of the Vacation Parcel in the amount of $3,000.00 (“Compensation”). SECTION 6: RECORDATION. The City Manager is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation to be recorded with the office of the Cook County Clerk only after receipt of the Compensation from the Owner. SECTION 7: MAINTENANCE OF THE VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY. After the recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation, the City will have no obligation to maintain or perform improvements on the vacated Right-of-Way. SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect only upon, and not before the occurrence of the following events: A. Passage and approval by a 3/4 majority and publication in the manner provided by law; B. Receipt by the City of the Compensation from the Owner and the satisfaction of the condition set forth in Section 3 of this Ordinance; and C. Recordation of this Ordinance and the Plat of Vacation with the office of the Cook County Clerk. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 53 of 55 PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 54 of 55 PLAT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION ALL OF THE I 5' PUBLIC ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL LOTS 15 & 16 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 15 TO 34, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN WHIPPLES ADDITION TO RIVERVIEW, A SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER QF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER Permanent Index Number of Adjoining Properties 09-29-223-014 09-29-223-021 09-29-223-022 09-29-223-028 09-29-223-029 Owner of the property shown ond described hereon, hereby adopt this plot of vocation. STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF COOK) SS ______________ , A Notary Public in and far said county, in the state of aforesaid, Do hereby certify that ________________ , Personally Known to me to be the Same Person Whose Name before me this day in is Subscribed ta the Foregoing Instrument, Appeared said instrument as and acknowledged that he/she signed and delivered free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and official seal. This _______ Doy of 20 Signed _________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF COOK) SS I, Jason R. Doland, hereby the plat shown hereon and that it is correct; The iron in the as indicated hereon, In accordance with the Des Plaines code; That the property is within limits of the City of Des which hos adopted an official plan, that the property is not within o special flood hazard area, os by the Federal Emergency Management Agency on the most recent Flood Insurance Rate Mop Panel 219 of 832, Community Panel No. 17031 C0219J Signed Illinois Professional Land Surveyor STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF COOK) SS Date ______________ , A Notary Public in and for said county, in the state of aforesaid, Do hereby certify that ________________ , Personally Known to me ta be the Same Person Whose Name is Subscribed to the Foregoing Instrument, Appeared before me this day in and acknowledged that he/she signed and delivered said instrument as free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and official seal. This _______ Day of 20 Signed Notary Public My Commission Expires: ___________ _ CITY OF DES PLAINES RIGHTS AND RESTRICTIONS: The City of Des Plaines reserves the rights for current and/or future utilities and drainage easement over across and upon the land for the subdivision and other property with electrical and communications services, gas, coble television, storm water drainage and sanitary sewers. Permanent easement rights are hereby reserved for: Commonwealth Edison Company and Ameritech and Northern Illinois Gas Company and Any Cable Communications Firm or Company Granted a Cable Communications Franchise by the Village of Palatine and The City of Des Plaines, Grantees. MAYOR Approved by the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Illinois. This _______ Doy of 20 --- Signed Mayor Attest City Clerk DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING Approved by the Director of Public Works & Engineering of the City of Des Plaines, Illinois. This _______ Day of 20 --- Signed Director of Public Works and Engineering Attest City Clerk I I I I I I I _L -J l -I I � � I I----1 rj Walk s d6"/ / / \Fence .::_j I I 125.0' REC. / / ALLJ;Y / / / I I I I I I I / _L j____ _I -- PROSPECTAVENUE ------ // / / c- ('� I I I 33' TO CL I· -j 15' ALL YVACATED O::'. � / "in � I �J ;::; I ;1diI I _J 7 33' TO CL I ,---1 I----- I L----1 I I I i I r -- I L--- SCALE: 1' 20' Rev. NOVEMBER 21, 2023 JULY 11, 2023 DOLAND ENGINEERING, LLC. -CIVIL ENGINEER/NG N LAND SURVEYING N LAND PLANN/NG-334 EAST COLFAX STREET, SUITE C PALATINE. ILLINOIS 60067 (847) 991-5088 (847) 934-3427 FAX Exhibit A Page 55 of 55 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5390 desplaines.org Date: November 14, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, MCP, LEED-AP, City Manager From: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works and Engineering Subject: Nicor Gas Franchise Agreement Issue: The City’s franchise agreement with the Northern Illinois Gas Company (d/b/a Nicor Gas) has expired and needs renewal. Analysis: The City received a proposed agreement renewal from Nicor Gas to construct, operate and maintain a gas distribution system in the Municipality for a term of 50 years commencing January 1, 2024. In exchange, Nicor Gas will supply without charge to the City an amount of gas not to exceed 108,810 therms per year of the agreement to municipal buildings solely for municipal purposes and not for purposes of revenue. Recommendation: We recommend approval of the proposed 50-year franchise agreement with Nicor Gas Company, 1844 Ferry Road, Naperville, Illinois 60563. Attachments: Ordinance M-24-23 Resolution R-221-23 Exhibit A – Therm Allocation Proposal MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 8 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONSENT AGENDA #11. CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE M - 24 - 23 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, D/B/A NICOR GAS COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A GAS DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM IN AND THROUGH THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS.__________________________________ WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City's franchise agreement with Northern Illinois Gas Company, d/b/a Nicor Gas Company ("Nicor"), has expired; and WHEREAS, City desires to authorize Nicor to construct, operate, and maintain a gas distribution system within the City’s rights-of-way (“Franchise Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the Franchise Agreement with Nicor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this ordinance as the findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. A.That the right, permission and authority be and the same are hereby granted to Nicor, for a term of 50 years, a system for the production, distribution and sale of gas for fuel, heating, power, processing and other purposes within and outside the corporate limits of the City, and to construct, lay, maintain and operate such gas pipes, mains, conductors and other devices, apparatus and equipment as may be necessary or convenient for such system in, under, along and across each and all of the streets, alleys, avenues and other public places in the City, subject to the conditions and regulations hereinafter set forth. B.All pipes, mains, conductors and other appliances, including connections with service pipes, hereafter laid in streets, alleys, avenues or other public places, shall be laid under the Page 2 of 8 supervision of the City Department of Public Works, or such other duly authorized agent of the City as the City Council may from time to time designate. All pipes, mains, conductors and other appliances shall be so located as not to injure unnecessarily any drains, sewers, catch basins, water pipes, pavements or other like public improvements, but should any drain, sewer, catch basin, water pipe, pavement or other like public improvement be injured by such location, the Nicor shall forthwith repair the damage caused by such injury to the satisfaction of the City Department of Public Works, or such other duly authorized agent, and in default thereof the City may repair such damage and charge the cost thereof to, and collect the same from, the Nicor. Nicor shall be subject to all reasonable regulations which may now or hereafter be prescribed by general ordinance of the City with respect to the use of the public streets, alleys, avenues and other public places of the City. C.Nicor shall indemnify, become responsible for and forever save harmless the City from any and all judgments, damages, decrees, costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, which the Municipality may legally suffer or incur, or which may be legally obtained against the Municipality, for or by reason of the use and occupation of any street, alley, avenue or other public place in the City by Nicor pursuant to the terms of this ordinance or legally resulting from the exercise by Nicor of any of the privileges herein granted; except that the indemnity provided for in this Section 2.C shall not apply to any liability, judgments, damages, decrees, costs and expenses determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the negligence or intentional acts or omissions of City, its agents and employees. SECTION 3: ACCEPTANCE BY NICOR. Within 30 days after passage, this Ordinance shall be accepted by Nicor by its filing with the City Clerk an unconditional written acceptance of this Ordinance, to be duly executed according to law, and a failure of Nicor to so accept this Ordinance within said period of time shall be deemed a rejection hereof by Nicor, and the rights and privileges herein granted shall after the expiration of said period of 30 days, if not so accepted, absolutely cease and determine, unless said period of time shall be extended by the City by Page 3 of 8 Ordinance duly passed for that purpose and before the expiration of said period of 30 days. SECTION 4: BINDING EFFECT. All provisions of this ordinance which are obligatory upon, or which inure to the benefit of, Nicor shall also be obligatory upon and shall inure to the benefit of any and all successors and assigns of Nicor, and the word “Grantee” or “Nicor” wherever appearing in this Ordinance shall include and be taken to mean not only said Northern Illinois Gas Company, d/b/a Nicor Gas Company, but also each and all of such successors and assigns. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance, if accepted by Nicor as hereinabove provided, shall be in full force and effect as of January 1, 2024, and from and after the effective date shall supersede, cancel, repeal and be in lieu of any and all other existing or prior grants of right, permission and authority by said City to Nicor or any predecessor companies or assignors of Nicor to construct, operate and maintain any system for the production, distribution and sale of gas for fuel, heating, power, processing and any other purposes within the corporate limits of this City, and this ordinance shall likewise cancel all of the obligations under said existing or prior grants. PASSED this _____ day of _________________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of ___________________, 2023. VOTE: AYES ______ NAYS ______ ABSENT ______ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY CLERK Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form: ____ day of ____________, 2023. ________________________________ CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 4 of 8 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 221 - 23 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL FROM NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, D/B/A NICOR GAS COMPANY, TO PROVIDE GAS TO MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS.______________________ WHEREAS, the City is a home rule municipal corporation in accordance with Article VII, Section 6(a) of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 authorizes the City to contract with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. M-24-23, approving a franchise agreement with Northern Illinois Gas Company, d/b/a Nicor Gas Company (“Nicor”) to construct, operate, and maintain a gas distribution system within the City’s rights-of-way (“Franchise Agreement Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, in consideration for the adoption of the Franchise Agreement Ordinance, Nicor submitted a proposal (“Proposal”) to the City to provide a supply of gas (“Therm Allocation”), without charge to the City, to be used in buildings which may be occupied from time to time by the City solely for municipal purposes, or such part thereof as may from time to time be so occupied, and not for purposes of revenue; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Proposal, the amount of the Therm Allocation is based on the population of the City as established by each decennial census; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and the public to accept and approve the Proposal for the Term Allocation from Nicor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL. The City Council hereby approves the Proposal from Nicor for the provision of the Therm Allocation in the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. SECTION 3: EXECUTION. The City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and seal, on behalf of the City, the Agreement documentation necessary to receive the Therm Allocation. Page 5 of 8 2 SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 6 of 8 1844 Ferry Road Naperville, Illinois 60563 630 983 8676 tel Mayor and City Council City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 Mayor and Council Members: The undersigned, Northern Illinois Gas Company (d/b/a Nicor Gas Company) (the “Company”), for and in consideration of the adoption by the authorities of the City of Des Plaines, Illinois (the “Municipality”), of an ordinance granting the Company the right to construct, operate and maintain a gas distribution system in the Municipality for a term of 50 years from January 1, 2024 (the “Franchise Ordinance”), hereby agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, that so long as said ordinance shall remain in full force and effect, Company will during each billing year (start and finish of each year shall begin and end with regular meter reading date nearest to January 1) throughout the remainder of the life of said ordinance, supply without charge to the Municipality, an amount of gas not to exceed 108,810 therms (“Therm Allocation”), to be used in buildings which may be occupied from time to time by the Municipality solely for municipal purposes, or such part thereof as may from time to time be so occupied, and not for purposes of revenue. The Therm Allocation is calculated using the municipality’s population of 60,675 based on the most recent decennial census data. The Therm Allocation will be adjusted by the Company based on each decennial census count. Between decennial census counts, Therm Allocation may be increased on the basis of changes in population of the Municipality as shown by revised or special census. Upon the submission of a written request by the Municipality accompanied by the official State notification of census change, the Therm Allocation will be adjusted by the Company. For so long as the Franchise Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect, the Municipality’s Therm Allocation will be based on the following revised formula: First 10,000 of population 3.60 therms per capita; Next 10,000 of population 2.40 therms per capita; Next 80,000 of population 1.20 therms per capita; Next 20,000 of population 1.45 therms per capita; Over 120,000 of population 1.80 therms per capita. DRAFTPage 7 of 8Exhibit A Page 2 City of Des Plaines None of said gas to be supplied without charge to the Municipality, shall be resold for any purpose whatsoever, and in the event the Municipality uses less than the above-mentioned number of therms of gas in any billing year, there shall be no payment due to the Municipality from the Company, or its successors and assigns, for gas not used during that billing year, nor shall any such unused therms be carried over for the following year’s use. In the event the Company’s policy in regard to the practice of supplying gas without charge to municipalities in its present service area is changed at any time in the future, or in the event that the Company in the future provides any other gas utility service benefit as a matter of general policy to all municipalities in such service area, it will inform the Municipality of any such change and, upon acceptance by the Municipality, will grant the Municipality the benefits of such change or benefits under the same conditions applicable to other municipalities. The Company, for itself, its successors and assigns, reserves the option, however, to reduce the total amount of gas supplied during any one billing year without charge as aforesaid by the amount of any fees which the Municipality may charge the Company for permits, street or parkway openings, or inspections of any kind. Such reduction will be arrived at by the use of the Company’s applicable rate for such calculation. This agreement shall supersede, replace and be in lieu of the provisions as to the supply of gas without charge to the Municipality contained in a letter of the Company addressed to the Mayor and City Council dated December 5, 2022. DRAFTPage 8 of 8Exhibit A 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: November 21, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Samantha Redman, Senior Planner Cc: Ryan Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Consideration of Map Amendment and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street (Site A) Issue: The petitioner is requesting the following under the Zoning Ordinance for the properties at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street: (i) a Map Amendment to rezone from M-2 General Manufacturing to R-3 Townhouse Residential District; (ii) a Preliminary PUD, with exceptions for minimum front yard and minimum lot area, to allow a 50-unit townhouse development. Petitioner: Luz and Associates #1, LLC, 2030 West Wabansia Ave., Chicago, IL 60611 Owner: Contour Saws, Inc., 100 Lakeview Parkway, Ste. 100, Vernon Hills, IL 60061 Case Number: 23-039-MAP-PUD-TSUB PINs: 09-20-105-016-0000, 09-20-105-017-0000, 09-20-105-020-0000, 09-20-105- 021-0000, 09-20-105-022-0000, 09-20-105-023-0000, 09-20-105-024-0000, 09-20-105-045-0000, 09-20-203-006-0000 Ward: #3, Alderman Sean Oskerka Existing Zoning: M-2, General Manufacturing Existing Land Use: Unoccupied manufacturing building Surrounding Zoning: North: M-1, Light Manufacturing and R-1, Single Family Residential South: R-4, Central Core Residential and C-3, General Commercial East: R-1, Single Family Residential and R-4, Central Core Residential West: Railroad and M-1, Light Manufacturing MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 158 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONSENT AGENDA #12. Surrounding Land Use: North: Manufacturing building and single-family detached residences South: Multi-family residential buildings and vacant parking lot (proposed multi-family residential on this property) East: Railroad and manufacturing buildings West: Single-family detached and multi-family residential buildings Street Classification: Graceland Avenue is classified as a major road and under the ownership of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT); Thacker Street is classified as a secondary road and is under the ownership of the City of Des Plaines. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial is the recommended use for this property. Property/Zoning History: The subject property was previously the site of Contour Saws, a manufacturing facility operating from the 1960s to 2020. The property is currently improved with an approximately 105,000 square foot manufacturing facility, consisting of several joined buildings to create one large two-story building. The remainder of the property consists of surface parking. Sanborn maps from the 1920s indicate this site was previously a subdivision with half acre tracts of land with single-family detached residences.1 In the early 1960s the Contour Saws facility began operating at this site, using existing buildings and constructing additional buildings. Functionally, the facility is one joined building, including an original residence from the 1920s subdivision previously used for the office of Contour Saws. Zoning between the late 1920s and present day has shifted from residential to commercial to manufacturing on this property. The property is currently owned by Contour Saws and is unoccupied. On September 20, 2022, a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter was issued for the property from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). An NFR letter signifies that, while the site may have previously contained contaminants that exceeded state or federal limits, the IEPA does not deem this site to constitute a significant risk of harm. The NFR letter was pursued in response to a Phase II environmental review completed in 2016 indicating presence of contaminants in soil and groundwater, associated with the previous use at this property. After review of a Remedial Action Plan prepared in 2022, an NFR Letter was issued by IEPA stating the property is approved for residential, commercial, or industrial land use. However, any NFR letter typically specifies actions necessary for safe use of the property. For this property, the controls include the development of a safety plan for construction of the building to limit worker exposure, and the necessary asphalt/concrete barriers and types of foundation necessary for buildings. All of the controls must be maintained to maintain the certification of the NFR; if any violation of the controls is observed, the letter will be voided, and enforcement actions would be implemented by the IEPA. The petitioner is aware of the NFR Letter and designed the project to be compliant with all the controls required to be in place. 1 1924 Sanborn Map of Des Plaines Page 2 of 158 Project Description: Overview The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the Contour Saws parking lot on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing to build a 50-unit townhouse development and a private, publicly accessible park on the property. Proposal The proposal includes the removal of all existing buildings and structures to redevelop the subject property into a 50-unit townhouse Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed development consists of eight separate three story townhouse buildings with various numbers of units depending on the building. A publicly accessible, privately owned park is proposed at the north corner of the development with landscaped areas throughout the development. Refer to Architectural Plan attachment. The anticipated unit mix will be 33 three-bedrooms and 17 two-bedrooms, with a unit size ranging from approximately 2,200 to 2,500 square feet each. Refer to Floor Plan attachment. Each unit will have a two-car, attached garage and thirteen surface parking spaces are provided for guests on the site. MAP AMENDMENT Request Description: Zoning Map Amendment Overview The purpose of a zoning map amendment is to determine whether an existing zoning district is suitable for a location and, if not, which zoning district would be more suitable, given the context of the neighborhood, city goals, and local, state, and national development trends. Although a specific project can be considered alongside any zoning application, zoning change deliberation often looks at a property at a larger scale within the neighborhood and city. A Site Plan Review, as required by Section 12-3-2, was performed for the conceptual project at this site. The Site Plan Review contributes to the overall assessment of a zoning map amendment, demonstrating the feasibility of a specific project with this zoning. Refer to the Site Plan Review section of this report and associated attachments. M-2 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-3 Zoning The M-2, General Manufacturing zoning district is intended to accommodate a diversity of industrial uses. Out of all of the industrial districts, M-2 permits the largest number of different uses, allowing for 23 uses permitted by right (meaning no zoning entitlement process) and 24 conditional uses. A broad variety of uses are allowed by right, including light and heavy manufacturing, warehouses or distribution facilities, or food processing establishments. Few available properties exist in Des Plaines with the range of transit, recreational, and commercial opportunities available within walking distance, making this site an ideal location for additional residential versus commercial or manufacturing development. Within a half-mile of the property (an approximate 8–15-minute walk for the average person 2), the following services 2 Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speeds of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, page 17. Page 3 of 158 are available. Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment for further details. Service Transit Des Plaines Metra Station platform; Pace Bus Stops for Lines 226, 230, and 250, and the PULSE Dempster Line Downtown Commercial Area Restaurants, grocery store, retail/personal services including dentist, optometrist, urgent care, physical therapist, private gym, and salons Schools (private and public) Central Elementary School, Willows Academy, Little Bulgarian School, Islamic City Center of Des Plaines Academy Parks Centennial Park, Central Park, Paroubeck Park, Potowatomie Park Public Buildings Library, City Hall A change to the zoning would be necessary to allow residential uses on this property. No residential uses are permitted within the M-2 zoning district. An analysis of the various options for residential zoning districts is necessary to determine what is best suited for this site. Below is a table of residential zoning districts and the residential uses permitted within them. Residential Districts Use Matrix Use R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Single Family Detached P C* C* C* Townhouse Not permitted Not permitted P P Two-family (duplex) Not permitted P Not permitted Not permitted Multi-Family Not permitted Not permitted P P *Note: Only applies to single-family detached dwellings that were lawfully constructed prior to August 17, 2020 and are located in a zoning district other than R-1. The R-1 and R-2 zoning districts would restrict the density of residential units at the property, limiting the development potential. As the name suggests, the R-1, Single Family Residential district limits the number of dwelling units to one dwelling unit per parcel. The R-2, Two-Family Residential district similarly limits the number of dwellings to two units per parcel. To allow for more than one or two residences on this 3.13-acre property, the property would need to be subdivided. If the property were subdivided to meet the R-1 or R-2 bulk standards, it is unlikely the property could produce 50 units, even with a planned unit development. Comparatively, a townhouse or multi-family development would supply a greater number of units in the same amount of space, creating a more efficient and economical option for this location. For the contemplated project, the R-3 zoning district was selected by the petitioner because this zoning best fits the intended scale and purpose of the development. Page 4 of 158 Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population The existing housing stock throughout the city is predominantly single-family residential and the Comprehensive Plan states it is a goal to maintain this stock of high-quality single family residential property within the city. However, the detached single family housing type is an increasingly unaffordable product for many existing and future residents. In comparison, townhouses provide additional housing stock at a more financially attainable scale due to the smaller size and reduced maintenance cost. An important goal of 2019 Comprehensive Plan is to provide avenues to allow residents to age-in-place and improve accessibility. As of 2015, the percentage of Des Plaines residents 50 or older was 40.2%, compared to the regional average of 31.4%.3 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, this percentage is likely to grow, with one in five Americans at retirement age by 2030.4 Households approaching retirement are frequently interested in downsizing to limit maintenance costs and reduce monthly housing costs to meet limitations of fixed incomes. Supplying a diverse housing stock in this area provides the option for seniors to continue living within the city. A residential development in this location would be close enough to facilities and services for an aging population to independently complete activities of daily living, with many amenities available within walking or transit distance. With these considerations regarding the location of the property near multi- family properties and zoning, the proximity to numerous private and public services, and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan focused on providing diversity of housing stock and providing accessible and attainable options for residents, senior or otherwise, the R-3 zoning district is a suitable fit for this property. 3 Des Plaines 2019 Comprehensive Plan, Page 32 https://www.desplaines.org/home/showpublisheddocument/162/637612522934400000 4 U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Older People Projected to Outnumber Children for First Time in U.S. History, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html Page 5 of 158 Site Plan Review Proposed Project Overview The petitioner proposes 50 townhouse units, including 33 three-bedroom units and 17 two-bedroom units and a publicly accessible, private park space. The proposed development is one of two for the former Contour Saws properties. The parking lot of the former Contour Saws facility is proposed to be a 56-unit multifamily development; a petition to change the zoning from C-3 to R-4 was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) on July 25, 2023. This type of development is permitted in the proposed R-3 Townhouse, with a PUD. The below diagram illustrates staff’s interpretation of where the required yards are located for this property, as noted in Section 12-7-2 and defined in Section 12-13-3. 1 Exception request with PUD to reduce required front yard. 2 Exception request with PUD to reduce minimum lot area. Publicly accessible private park lot excluded from total lot area. R-3 - Townhouse Residential District Bulk Standards Bulk Controls Required Proposed Maximum height 45 ft. 34 ft. Minimum front yard 25 ft. 12 ft.1 Minimum corner side 10 ft. 10 ft. Minimum rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum lot width 55 ft. 516.72 ft Minimum lot area 2800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit * 50 units = 140,000 sq. ft. 130,406 sq. ft.2 Page 6 of 158 Site Plan Review Standards Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, a Site Plan Review is required for all map amendment requests to assess how the request meets the characteristics identified in Section 12-3-2, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the current Site Plan provided by the petitioner, located in the Site Plan attachment. Site Plan Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) The arrangement of structures on the site • Places buildings along the street frontage, rather than garages or surface parking. The design presents better cohesion with the buildings surrounding it by placing the building at approximately the same distance from the property line as the existing building and the adjacent existing and proposed multi- family buildings. The proximity of the building to the street also provides better surveillance within the neighborhood, with windows facing the residential neighborhood and providing additional “eyes on the street.” • The design of each townhouse includes a two car, attached garage, providing covered parking in a more compact manner than surface parking. Guest spaces are located in the center of the property. The site layout minimizes view of the parking area and interior roadway, with the buildings as the primary focus along the street. • A subdivision is requested as part of this request. Improvements deemed necessary in the area adjacent to a subdivision can be required pursuant to Section 13-3-2.L. The improvements required to serve this development are discussed in the Public Works and Engineering (PWE) Department Memo attachment. Improvements are required prior to completion of the development or within 2 years of the recorded subdivision. A summary of the improvements includes replacement of a water main in a portion of Graceland Avenue, construction of pedestrian bump out and flashing pedestrian signage at the intersection of Thacker and Laurel, replacement of a streetlight on Graceland Avenue, and grinding and resurfacing Thacker Street as well as replacement of any damaged public sidewalk. Page 7 of 158 The arrangement of open space and landscape improvements • Landscaping is provided around and within the development, meeting zoning requirements. In addition, a park space is proposed, as noted on the plans and the Park Concept Plan attachment. Refer to Landscape Plan attachment for details on landscaping. • Parkway trees and landscaping proposed along Graceland Avenue, where none currently exist. • A solid wood fence is proposed along the railroad track to screen the railroad from the development. A condition of approval requires an open fence at the northwest corner of the park to alleviate any sight obstruction between the railroad and Thacker Street. The adequacy of the proposed circulation system on the site • Several driveways will be closed along Graceland Avenue, with one driveway entrance/exit proposed on Graceland Avenue and one along Thacker Street. The existing driveway along Thacker is not aligned with Laurel Avenue. The proposed plan aligns the driveway to this street. The closure of these extra driveways and replacement with a parkway and walkway improves safety and comfort for pedestrians along Graceland and Thacker. • Pedestrian circulation is provided by numerous walkways from Graceland and Thacker from each unit to the existing public sidewalk or to sidewalks withing the development. The proposed plan includes bump outs at the intersection of Thacker and Laurel to improve pedestrian safety to and from the publicly accessible park and the adjacent neighborhood. • Vehicular circulation is provided by interior, private roads accessed from two driveways, one along Graceland Avenue and one along Thacker Street. The roads are 26 feet in width, exceeding the maximum required width (22 ft) for a two- way drive aisle per Section 12-9-6. • Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12-9-7, providing two spaces per residential unit (50 garage spaces) and one space per four units (13 guest spaces, in surface parking area) which is the minimum required amount. Page 8 of 158 • It is anticipated, as discussed in the petitioner’s response to standards and the provided traffic study, that the proximity of the site to numerous transit options and a bike route along Thacker St, will reduce dependence on automobiles for this project. The location, design, and screening of proposed off-street parking areas • Attached garages are proposed with each unit, facing interior, private roads within the development rather than connecting to the street. The proposed site is situated in such a way that guest parking is located in the middle and has minimal visibility from Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street. Landscaping is provided along driveways. The adequacy of the proposed landscaping design on the site • All required landscaping in terms of foundation landscaping, parkway landscaping, and overall site landscaping are provided (pursuant to Sections 12-10-6, 12-10-7 and 12-10-10). Landscaping, either turf, bushes, or trees are provided throughout the development. Refer to Landscape Plan. • The park along Thacker Street is proposed to be a publicly accessible park space, providing additional landscaping and recreational opportunities. The design, location, and installation of proposed site illumination • Photometric plan demonstrates conformance with Section 12-12-10, with no more than 0.2- foot candles spilling over the property line in any location, well within the limits of the zoning ordinance. • The parking lot is properly illuminated, with at least one footcandle in any parking area, meeting requirements of Section 12-9-6.G. A condition of approval is to provide additional illumination at the driveways entering the development on Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street. The correlation of the proposed site plan with adopted land use policies, goals, and objectives of the comp. plan • Does not fit the manufacturing use illustrated by the Comprehensive Plan; however, the 2019 plan was written under the assumption that the Contour Saw facility would continue operating. • The proposed plan supports the following goals (refer to M-2 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-3 Zoning section of this report for further details): Page 9 of 158 o Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs. o Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points • In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. • The creation of a separate parcel for a privately owned, publicly accessible park provides additional recreational opportunities, which is supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Summary of Public Outreach In an effort to improve community engagement and transparency surrounding new, large developments within Des Plaines, the City provided numerous opportunities for residents to review the proposal and provide input. To provide regular project updates, a webpage on the city website was created: desplaines.org/contourplace. On June 6, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Board hosted a public workshop to provide the developer, board, and the public an opportunity to review plans and provide input into the proposed development at this location and the former Contour Saws facility to the north of this property. During the July 25, 2023 PZB meeting, the petitioner provided an updated site plan depicting townhouses instead of multi-family residential buildings. The project webpage was launched prior to the PZB workshop to share details about the proposed projects and includes a public input form to continuously gather community comments. Refer to Public Comment attachment for all public comments. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Request Description: Overview The proposed development includes eight separate “principal buildings.” Section 12-13-3 of the Zoning Ordinance defines a “principal building” as “a nonaccessory building in which a principal use of the lot, on which it is located, is conducted.” Pursuant to Section 12-7-1.A, not more than one principal building or structure can be located on a zoning lot, except in certain cases. In this circumstance, a planned development, as defined below, is the only case suitable for the proposal. “A development occurring on a parcel under single ownership or unified control which is developed as a unit and includes two (2) or more principal buildings or uses and is processed under the planned development procedure of this title” (Section 12-13-3). Page 10 of 158 The purpose of a PUD is to promote a unified development by providing flexibility in development standards to accommodate site conditions and encourage innovative use of land. Certain characteristics are required by Section 12-3-5.A of the Zoning Ordinance, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the attached Preliminary PUD Plat provided by the petitioner. Preliminary PUD Plat Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) A maximum choice in the types of environments available to the public by allowing a development that would not be possible under the strict application of the other sections of this title Allows for construction of a development on an irregularly shaped parcel and provides an additional housing option with increased density and multiple principal buildings that is not permitted without a PUD in the Zoning Ordinance. Permanent preservation of common open space and recreation areas and facilities Creates a publicly accessible, private park where none exist currently. Landscaping and open space is provided around and between residential units and the private road as well as along Graceland Avenue, where landscaping was limited or non- existent before. A pattern of development to preserve natural vegetation, topographic and geologic features No significant natural vegetation, topographic or geologic features exist on site that would be beneficial to maintain. However, allowing for additional buildings breaks up the site so landscaping can be provided between buildings and sufficient area is available for a park and open space. A creative approach to the use of land and related physical facilities that results in better development and design and the construction of aesthetic amenities Building design/layout provides a defined separation between paved areas and common space; provides adequate screening between these areas and neighboring lots. An efficient use of the land resulting in more economic networks of utilities, streets, and other facilities Reduces curb cuts onto both streets and ties into existing utilities and facilities. The traffic study provided by the petitioner (refer to attachments) did not indicate any substantial impact to traffic in the area compared to the manufacturing use previously operating in this location for decades. A land use which promotes the public health, safety, and Transforms a presently vacant site with dilapidating manufacturing structures to Page 11 of 158 general welfare create a use that includes more visual appeal, additional landscaping, and recreational opportunities, and adds additional residential housing stock in a suitable area. Prerequisites: Location, Ownership, and Size PUDs are authorized in all zoning districts in the City subject to the regulations in Section 12-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance and are required to be under single ownership and/or unified control. While the subject property is currently not owned by the petitioner, the petitioner does intend to take ownership of the property upon approval of the requests in this application. Because the development will involve rental units with one property management and maintenance entity, a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) is not required at this time; however, a condition of approval states if the development is subdivided into separate, fee-simple townhouse units, an HOA must be established to manage and maintain the proposed PUD. PUD Bulk Exceptions As identified in the R-3 Bulk Regulations table, the proposal does not meet the minimum front yard size and does not meet the minimum lot area, requiring a PUD exception from Section 12-3-5.C.2 (Perimeter Yards) and Section 12-3- 5.C. The exceptions allow for a development that efficiently uses the irregularly shaped parcel in a way that would not be possible under the strict application of the code. Parking Requirement Pursuant to Section 12-9-7, a townhouse (single-family attached) residential use requires a minimum of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit plus one common guest space for every four dwelling units. The proposed 50-unit PUD requires a minimum of 100 off-street parking spaces and 13 common guest spaces. The attached PUD Site Plan indicates two covered off-street garage spaces for each unit and guest parking provided by thirteen standard spaces, including one accessible space in an interior parking area of the development. . TENTATIVE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION Request Description: Overview The proposal includes a consolidation of the property from eight lots to two lots. One lot will be 130,406 square feet, proposed to be developed with the townhouses and associated structures. A second lot, 6,182 square feet, is proposed to be a publicly accessible, private park space. The attached Tentative Plat of Subdivision, titled 1217 Thacker Street Consolidation, shows the location and boundaries of each lot. Easements The Tentative Plat shows both existing and proposed easements. Proposed easements include storm sewer, watermain, sanitary sewer, and a general public utility and drainage easement, depicting both drainage on the site and the proposed underground vault to accommodate stormwater. Page 12 of 158 Subdivision Improvements The Department of Public Works and Engineering (PWE) has provided comments (attached) based on the submittal. The memo states the following is required with this subdivision, to be finalized at the final plat of subdivision stage: 1. Grind and re-surface eastbound lane on Thacker Street. 2. Add 8” water main to replace 4” water main along a portion of Graceland Avenue. 3. Add pedestrian crosswalk crossing on Thacker Street including a bump- out, striping, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB). 4. The sole streetlight along Graceland Avenue must be replaced and electrical conduit undergrounded. Petitioner will work with staff and ComEd to coordinate this replacement. Section 13-3-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance discusses required improvements for subdivided properties and timelines for the improvements. Improvements are approved by the City Council during the final plat of subdivision process and financial guarantees for improvements are included within the resolution. In addition, Section 13-4-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance discusses dedication of park lands and/or fees in lieu for subdivisions. The publicly accessible, private park will count for a portion of the required park land dedication and any remainder will require a fee in lieu, to be calculated at the time of final plat of subdivision, approved by the Park District, and included with the final approved City Council resolution to subdivide the property. Note the petitioner’s request is for a Tentative Plat only at this time. The Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) approved the Tentative Plat of Subdivision at the October 24, 2023 meeting and the petitioner will be required to go through the Final Plat of Subdivision next, which will require a public hearing that the PZB and final approval by City Council. The steps for Final Plat are articulated in Sections 13-2-4 through 13-2-8 of the Subdivision Regulations. The Final Plat of Subdivision will occur at a later date and will be a concurrent process with the Final PUD plat. All necessary dedications, fees, and necessary improvements will be outlined in the final subdivision resolution. PZB Recommendation and Conditions: The PZB held a public hearing on October 24, 2023 to consider the requests. Their rationale for recommendations is captured in the excerpt to the approved minutes from the meeting. The PZB voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the Zoning Map Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD). Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.G.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council has final authority to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the request, which would be approved by Ordinance Z-33-23. At the October 24, 2023 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board also voted to approve a Tentative Plat of Subdivision request. The petitioner will submit a Final Plat of Subdivision for PZB recommendation and Council approval at a later date. Page 13 of 158 Should the City Council vote to approve the Preliminary PUD, the following conditions are recommended. These conditions are incorporated in the approving ordinance. Conditions of Approval: 1. In the event the property is sold, and/or a property owner desires to sell separate, fee-simple townhouse units, a Plat of Subdivision will be necessary to create separate lots and a Homeowner’s Association, or similar unified control entity must be established along with any covenants, conditions, and restrictions governing maintenance of common areas. 2. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD plat, all public improvements must be noted on plans and all engineering comments addressed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Engineering. 3. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD Plat, the landscape plan must be revised in the park area closest to Thacker Street between Laurel Avenue and the railroad track. Bushes and a semi- open fence (wrought iron or chain link) should be placed around the north corner of the proposed park to allow visibility for traffic from Thacker Street. 4. At time of final subdivision and PUD Plat, the photometric plan must be revised to include lighting at the entrances of both driveways. Any new lighting must be in conformance with Section 12-12-10 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Each townhouse unit shall have separate water and sanitary sewer services. 6. All electrical lines on the property must be installed underground. 7. The Petitioner shall enter into a Subdivision and Development Agreement memorializing its obligations to develop the Development Parcels in full compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, building codes and regulations, and the conditions set forth in this Ordinance as well as any other entitlements granted by the City. Attachments: Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Site and Context Photos Attachment 3: Amenities and Services Map Attachment 4: Petitioner’s Narrative and Responses to Standards Attachment 5: Plat of Survey Attachment 6: Tentative Plat of Subdivision Attachment 7: Public Works and Engineering (PWE) Department Memo Attachment 8: Traffic Impact Study without Appendices 5 Attachment 9: Petitioner’s Property Tax Projections Attachment 10: Public Comments Attachment 11: Chairman Szabo PZB Recommendation Letter Attachment 12: Excerpt of Approved Minutes from the October 24, 2023 PZB Meeting Ordinance Z-33-23 Exhibit A: Preliminary PUD Plat and Plans, including the PUD Site Plan, Architectural Plans, Landscape Plan, Photometric Plan, and Preliminary Engineering Plans 5 Full copy available upon request to the Community and Economic Development department. Page 14 of 158 Legend Zoning and Development Zoning C-1: Neighborhood Shopping C-3: General Commercial C-5: Central Business M-1: Limited Manufacturing M-2: General Manufacturing R-1: Single Family Residential R-3: Townhouse Residential R-4: Central Core Residential NotesPrint Date: 10/18/20230450900 ft Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground. Subject Site Attachment 1 Page 15 of 158 Public Notice Sign 1, facing property southwestPublic Notice Sign 2, facing property northFront of building, facing parking lot towards Graceland AvenueLocation of Laurel Avenue and proposed driveway and pedestriancrosswalkAttachment 2 Page 16 of 158 Area of existing building adjacent to railroad trackFormer office of Contour Saws, facing south towards the property Multifamily residential buildings across from property along GracelandAvenue, facing southMultifamily residential buildings across from property along GracelandAvenue, facing southwestAttachment 2 Page 17 of 158 Attachment 3 Page 18 of 158 Graceland and Thacker Development 1201 E. Thacker, 1217 E. Thacker and 900 Graceland (Site A) NARRATIVE The subject property contains approximately 136,588 sq. ft. of land and is improved with a one and two-story industrial building and twenty-six surface parking spaces. The exiting building was used by Contours Saw, Inc.’s for its industrial operations. The property is currently zoned M-2. The Applicant proposes to rezone the site to an R-3 classification with a PUD. The Applicant for the rezoning proposes to redevelop the property with 50 three-story townhomes distributed in eight separate buildings. The townhomes will consist of thirty-three, three-bedroom units and seventeen, two-bedroom units. Two parking spaces are provided for each townhome and 13 guest parking spaces are included in the plan. The proposed buildings’ height will be 34 feet. Vehicular access to the site will be from two driveways, one from Thacker Street that is aligned with Laurel Avenue and one from Graceland Avenue that is approximately 228 feet north of the southern terminus of the site. These two driveways replace five driveways that are currently on site. The façade materials will be primarily face brick, with fiber cement panels used on some sections to visually divide the individual units. Also, the plan includes one privately owned but publicly accessible parks, a 6,170 sq. ft. park on Thacker Street at the western terminus of the site. It also includes approximately 27,376 sq. ft. of common open space for use by the townhome occupants. Attachment 4 Page 19 of 158 STANDARDS FOR MAP AMENDMENTS 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, as adopted February 2019. The proposed rezoning will allow for the construction of multi-family housing near multi-modal facilities and Downtown, as the subject site is approximately five blocks from the Miner St. Metra Station and Downtown. It also will promote the development of multi-family units that would increase the housing diversity and provide housing for individuals and couples, and also aging residents that seek to continue an independent lifestyle while minimizing maintenance and ownership obligations. In addition, the supply of additional housing will assist in decreasing affordability concerns due to increased supply. The proposed townhomes also diversify the City’s housing stock by providing a residential type different than the single family homes that are more common and the multi-family buildings that have frequently been developed in more recent times. 2. The proposed amendment is compatible with current conditions and the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The subject property is across Graceland and Thacker from R-4 districts that extends north along Graceland and east along Thacker and are generally developed with three, four and five-story multi-family buildings. The western portion of the site’s Thacker Street frontage is across from an R-1 district generally developed with single family homes. The proposed R-3 designation represents a middle ground between this R-1 area and the R-4 area in the eastern portion of the Thacker frontage and across and along Graceland. 3. The proposed amendment is appropriate considering the adequacy of public facilities and services available to this subject property. There are sufficient public facilities in terms of utilities to accommodate R-3 development, with required stormwater detention to be provided as part of the development per the Des Plaines Municipal Code. The existing streets can accommodate the anticipated traffic, which traffic may also be reduced due to the proximity of public transportation via Metra, the existing bike corridor along Thacker and the proposed bike corridor along Graceland. In terms of public open space, Central Park is located approximately three blocks east, a publicly accessible open space is included in the plan, and approximately 27,376 sq. ft. of private common open space is provided for townhome occupants. Attachment 4 Page 20 of 158 4. The proposed amendment will not have an adverse effect on the value of properties throughout the jurisdiction. Because the proposed amendment will allow for development of multi-family residential of a scale compatible with adjacent properties and in a location where sufficient public facilities exist and resulting traffic can be accommodated, it will not have an adverse impact on property values within the City. In addition, the increase in tax base will help alleviate future tax increases on other properties and the increased resident population will support existing area businesses, both of which will positively impact the property value of other properties. 5. The proposed amendment reflects responsible standards for development and growth. The proposed amendment is consistent with responsible standard for development and growth by promoting increase density at a location where it can be accommodated that is proximate to public transit and non-vehicular travel paths, such as bike corridors. It increases the utilization of existing municipal infrastructure without taxing such infrastructure and does so while enhancing the municipal tax base. Attachment 4 Page 21 of 158 STANDARDS FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS 1. The extent to which the proposed plan is or is not consistent with the state purpose of the planned unit development regulation set forth in subsection A of this section; a. A maximum choice in the type of environment available to the public by allowing a development that would not be possible under the strict application of the other sections of this title; The proposed PUD allows for the construction of a townhome development on an irregularly shaped parcel. The townhomes are to be in eight separate buildings. As the property is a single zoning lot, Section 12-7-1.A would prohibit the construction of separate buildings on that single zoning lot and effectively would prohibit a cohesive townhome development layout that provides an attractive street frontage, consolidates open space and limits driveways from the public streets. b. Permanent preservation of common open space and recreation areas and facilities; Private open space is proposed along the southwestern portion of the property totaling approximately 27,376 sq. ft. This open space will be preserved via the restrictions of the PUD. In addition, privately owned but publicly accessible open space is proposed at the western terminus of the site. This open space will be preserved by the restrictions of the PUD and also through easements provided in connection with a companion subdivision. c. A pattern of development to preserve natural vegetation, topographic and geologic features; The property is wholly improved and contains no natural vegetation, topographic or geologic features. Attachment 4 Page 22 of 158 d. A creative approach to the use of land and related physical facilities that results in a better development and design and the construction of aesthetic amenities; The proposed plan provides an esthetically pleasing street frontage lined with residential units, that as divided into separate buildings breaks-up the massing and shields vehicular circulation areas from the public realm. It also allows for open space to be consolidated in a more private area along the southwestern portion of the property. In addition, the proposed plan by being a unified whole as allowed only under the PUD provisions, limits the number of curb cuts onto the public streets minimizing pedestrian – vehicular conflict points along the public sidewalks. e. An efficient use of the land resulting in more economic networks of utilities, streets and other facilities; and By allowing for one cohesive development, the PUD as proposed limits the number of connection points to existing public water and sewer infrastructure and also limits the number of curb cuts onto the bordering public streets. This is more efficient than having to have separate connection points and separate curb cuts to serve multiple individual zoning lots. f. A land use which promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare. By allowing for a cohesive plan that limits pedestrian vehicular conflicts in the public realm, provides an attractive street frontage lined with residential buildings that are separated to divide their massing and consolidating private and publicly accessible open space all in general conformance with the R-3 regulations, the proposed land use and plan promotes the public health, safety and general welfare. 2. The extent to which the proposed plan meets the requirements and standards of the planned unit development regulations; The property is under single ownership by Contour Saws and is intended to remain in single ownership by the Applicant for the PUD. It contains 3.14 acres, exceeding the 2 acre minimum for PUDs in the R-3. Attachment 4 Page 23 of 158 3. The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations otherwise applicable to the subject property, including, but not limited to the density, dimension, area, bulk and use and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest; As a townhouse development, the proposed development is consistent with the R-3 Townhouse Residential District’s purpose and regulations. Townhomes are a permitted use. At a 34 foot height the proposed townhomes are well below the 45 ft. height limit. On the 136,588 sq. ft. site, reduced to 130,418 due to the inclusion in the plan of a 6,170 sq. ft. publicly accessible open space, the R-3 minimum lot area of 2,800 sq. ft. would permit 47 townhomes. Fifty townhomes are proposed. The increase in density is minor, representing a mere 6.38 % increase in density. Given the nature of the property’s location, including the availability of nearby transit and proximity to downtown, this minor increase in density is consistent with the public interest. The required 10 foot corner side yard along Thacker and the required 25 foot rear yard are provided. As required, two parking spaces per unit and 13 guest parking spaces are provided. The only requirement that is not met is the required 25 foot front yard along Graceland, where the plan indicates a 16 foot setback near the Thacker corner and 13 foot setback for the balance of that frontage. This setback reduction is required to efficiently accommodate the structures and features of the proposed development on what is an irregularly shaped triangular parcel. Given the overall developments compliance with the R-3 regulations, its design that is compatible with the other residential improvements in the area, the broader setback near the corner with Thacker and the irregular shape of the property, it is in the public interest to allow such a departure from this standard. 4. The extent to which the physical design of the proposed plan does or does not make adequate provision for public services, provide adequate control over vehicular traffic, provide for and protect designated common open space, and further the amenities of light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment; The proposed physical design makes adequate provisions for public services including adequate space for the location of utilities and provides a configuration of driveways that allows for access by emergency vehicles. Vehicular traffic is controlled by providing only two access points from the public streets with the one on Thacker aligned with Laurel Avenue and the one on Graceland being sufficiently separated from the railroad right-of-way. Common open space, both private and publicly accessible is provide for, is protected by its location and preserved through the PUD and subdivision process. Light and air is protected by the separation of buildings and their height, which is lesser than otherwise Attachment 4 Page 24 of 158 allowed. The alignment of attractively designed townhomes along the public street enhances visual enjoyment from the public realm. 5. The extent to which the relationship and compatibility of the proposed plan is beneficial or adverse to adjacent properties and neighborhood; The site is effectively an island bordered by public streets and a railroad right-of- way. The neighborhood to the north and east of the site is generally residential with a mix of multi-family along Graceland and single-family along the western portion of Thacker across from the site. A moderate density townhome development as proposed is beneficial to this neighborhood. It replaces an industrial use that can be considered discordant with the immediate neighborhood. The development provides additional residential development near downtown and transit and that can support area retail and commercial establishments while further diversifying the City’s housing stock. 6. The extent to which the proposed plan is not desirable to the proposed plan to physical development, tax base and economic well being of the entire community; and The proposed plan reflects a cohesive and attractive development that is consistent with its environment and replaces a vacant industrial facility that is less so. It reduces the number of curb cuts from five to two, thereby reducing the points of potential vehicular pedestrian conflict along the public sidewalk. It provides both private and publicly accessible open space. It will increase the tax base generating more tax revenue that is currently attributed to the site. By resulting in a compatible residential development that diversifies the City’s housing stock and provides additional residents located on a parcel that is near downtown and transit thereby supporting the downtown commercial and retail uses without unduly increasing traffic, the proposed PUD furthers the well- being of the entire community. 7. The extent to which the proposed plan is not in conformity with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan. Important goals of the Comprehensive Plan are to diversify the City’s housing stock and allow residents to age-in-place and improve housing affordability compared to detached single family homes. It also seeks to strengthen downtown and the commercial uses therein and provide greater density near transit and recreational amenities. The proposed development supports these Attachment 4 Page 25 of 158 goals by providing a moderate density development that represents a middle ground between the nearby multi-family and single-family areas. The site is within walking distance to downtown and the METRA station. It is near four schools and four parks. It also is near the City library and City Hall. While the Comprehensive Plan denotes the site for Industrial use, the site has remained vacant for a number of years notwithstanding its industrial classification. In addition, such industrial designation appears to be the result of the site’s use at the time of the Comprehensive Plan’s adoption as opposed to being reflective of the surrounding residential uses. The proposed townhome development is more consistent with such surrounding residential uses than a possible new industrial use. Attachment 4 Page 26 of 158 Attachment 5 Page 27 of 158 Attachment 6 Page 28 of 158 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5390 desplaines.org Date: October 19, 2023 To: Samantha Redman, Senior Planner From: Timothy P. Oakley, P.E., CFM, Director of Public Works, and Engineering Cc: John La Berg, P.E., CFM, Civil Engineer Subject: 900 Graceland Ave and 1217 Thacker St Subdivision and Associated Townhouse Development Public Works and Engineering has reviewed the subject final engineering plans and is satisfied with them for zoning approval subject to the conditions below: Required Conditions • IEPA, MWRD, and IDOT permits are required prior to issuance of permits for construction and may be necessary for other stages of the project. • Each townhome unit shall have separate water and sanitary sewer services. • Hydrants and valves are to be added to the water main loop through the property. • All electrical lines on the property must be installed underground. MEMORANDUM Attachment 7 Page 29 of 158 Required Public Improvements Below are required public improvements for this project. Section 13-3-2.L of the Des Plaines Subdivision Ordinance describes ROW improvements adjacent to a property that the City is able to require with the subdivision process. •Eastbound lane of Thacker Street must be grinded and resurfaced. •Graceland is an IDOT route, and IDOT will determine the pavement replacement. •Public sidewalk adjacent to the site found to be in unsafe condition or damaged by construction shall be replaced. City of Des Plaines shall make final determination near the completion of construction activities. •Add pedestrian crosswalk crossing Thacker Street to Laurel Avenue., including a bump-out, crosswalk striping, signage including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB). •Add 8” ductile iron water main to replace 4” water main in Graceland only from the railroad tracks to your proposed connection (approximately 100 feet). This improvement will not require crossing Graceland Ave. with the water main. •Lone streetlight on Graceland Ave. must be replaced and service undergrounded. Staff suggests moving it south to light up the driveway entrance onto Graceland Ave. Petitioner may work with staff and ComEd to coordinate this replacement. TPO/jl Attachment 7 Page 30 of 158 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Prepared For: Luz and Associates #1 LLC September 28, 2023 SITE Attachment 8 Page 31 of 158 1. Introduction This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed residential development to be located at 900 Graceland Avenue in Des Plaines, Illinois. The site, which is currently occupied by Contour Saws Inc., will be redeveloped to provide approximately 50 townhomes. Each townhome will have two garage parking spaces and 13 guest parking spaces will be provided on site. The access will be provided off Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: x Existing roadway conditions x A description of the proposed development x Directional distribution of the development traffic x Vehicle trip generation for the development x Future traffic conditions including access to the development x Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours x Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system x Evaluation of the adequacy of the parking supply Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Projected Conditions – Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the traffic volumes that include the existing traffic volumes increased by an ambient growth factor and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. Attachment 8 Page 32 of 158 Site Location Figure 1 SITE Attachment 8 Page 33 of 158 Aerial View of Site Figure 2SITE Attachment 8 Page 34 of 158 2. Existing Conditions The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The site, which is currently occupied by Contour Saws Inc., is bounded by Thacker Street to the north, Union Pacific Metra Railroad to the west, and Graceland Avenue to the east. Land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily residential with commercial land uses along Lee Road. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the proposed development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. Thacker Street is generally an east-west major collector roadway that provides one travel lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Lee Road, Thacker Street provides a shared left-turn/through lane on the eastbound approach and a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach. High visibility crosswalks are provided on the east, north, and south legs of this intersection and a standard style crosswalk is provided on the west leg. Pedestrian signals are provided on all four legs of this intersection. At its signalized intersection with Graceland Avenue, Thacker Road provides a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane on the westbound approach. High visibility crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided on all four legs of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersections with Jeannette Street, First Avenue, Laurel Avenue, and the two alleys, Thacker Street does not provide any exclusive turn lanes. Thacker Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines, carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of approximately 8,900 vehicles (IDOT 2022), and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Attachment 8 Page 35 of 158 Attachment 8 Page 36 of 158 Graceland Avenue (U.S. 45) is a northeast-southwest, other principal arterial roadway that is one way in the southbound direction in the vicinity of the site providing two travel lanes. At its signalized intersection with Thacker Street, Graceland Avenue provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. At its unsignalized north intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Graceland Avenue provides a through lane and a shared left-turn/through lane on the southbound approach. At its unsignalized south intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Graceland Avenue provides a through lane and a shared through/right turn lane on the southbound approach. Graceland Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an AADT volume of approximately 17,000 vehicles (IDOT 2021), is not classified as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), and has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Lee Road is a northeast-southwest, other principal arterial roadway that is one way in the northbound direction in the vicinity of the site providing two travel lanes. At its signalized intersection with Thacker Street, Lee Road provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Lee Road provides a shared left-turn/through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. Lee Road is under the jurisdiction of IDOT, carries an AADT volume of 5,600 vehicles (IDOT 2021), is not classified as an SRA, and has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Oakwood Avenue is an east-west, local roadway that extends from 3rd Avenue to its terminus at River Road providing one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized north “T” intersection with Graceland Avenue, Oakwood Avenue provides a left-turn lane on the westbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the east leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized south “T” intersection with Graceland Avenue, Oakwood Avenue provides a right-turn lane on the eastbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the west leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersections with the alley and Lee Street, Oakwood Avenue provides a shared left-turn/through lane on the eastbound approach and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. Standard style crosswalks are provided on the east and west legs of the intersection of Oakwood Avenue with Lee Road. Oakwood Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the city of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Jeannette Street is a north-south local roadway that serves residential houses in the vicinity of the site. Jeannette Street extends south from Thacker Street to its terminus at Algonquin Road providing one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, Jeannette Street provides a shared left-turn/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. Jeannette Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. First Avenue is a north-south local roadway that provides one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, First Avenue provides a shared left-turn/right- turn lane on the southbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the north leg of this intersection. First Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Attachment 8 Page 37 of 158 Laurel Avenue is a north-south local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, Laurel Avenue provides a shared left-turn/right- turn lane on the southbound approach. Laurel Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. The east alley is a north-south local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized intersection with Thacker Street, the alley provides a shared left-turn/through/right- turn lane on both approaches. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Oakwood Avenue, the alley provides a shared left-turn/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions within the study area, KLOA. Inc conducted traffic counts using Miovision Video Scout Collection Units on Tuesday, April 11, 2023 and on Thursday, April 27, 2023 during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods at the following intersections: x Thacker Street with Lee Road x Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue x Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue x Thacker Street with First Avenue x Thacker Street with Jeannette Street x Thacker Street with the east alley x Thacker Steet with the west alley x Oakwood Avenue with Lee Road x Oakwood Avenue with the east alley x Oakwood Avenue with Graceland Avenue Based on the turning movement count data, it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic generally occurs between 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic generally occurs between 4:45 P.M. and 5:45 P.M. Figure 4 illustrates the Year 2023 existing traffic volumes. Attachment 8 Page 38 of 158 Attachment 8 Page 39 of 158 Train Observations The Union Pacific Metra North-West crosses Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street in the vicinity of the site. Based on the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) data, the tracks carry an average of 22 daily passenger trains only. Furthermore and based on the Metra schedule, the Des Plaines Metra station is served by 69 trains (34 inbound, 35 outbound) on weekdays, 31 trains on Saturdays, and 19 trains on Sundays operating between 5:00 A.M. and 1:00 A.M. Monday through Friday. Field observations conducted during the peak hours for the crossings of Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street indicated the following: Graceland Avenue Crossing x During the weekday morning peak hour, three Metra train events were observed. The gates were down for approximately 35 seconds on average. The southbound approach queue at the railroad crossing did not extend back to Thacker Street with a maximum queue of approximately 12 vehicles. x During the weekday evening peak hour, four Metra train events were observed. The gates were down for approximately 51 seconds on average. The southbound approach queue at the railroad crossing did not extend to Thacker Street with a maximum queue of approximately 12 vehicles. Thacker Street Crossing x During the weekday morning peak hour, the queues did not extend past Laurel Avenue. x During the weekday evening peak hour, the queues extended past Laurel Avenue for approximately 45 seconds and cleared within 30 seconds after the gate was opened. Crash Data Summary KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data 1 for the past five years (2018 to 2022) for the intersections of Thacker Street with Lee Road, Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue, Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue, Lee Road with Oakwood Avenue, Thacker Street with Jeannette Street, and Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue. A review of the crash data indicated that no crashes were reported at the intersection of Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue. It should be noted that no fatalities were reported at any studied intersection between 2018 and 2022. Tables 1 through 5 summarize the crash data for these intersections. 1 IDOT DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. The author is responsible for any data analyses and conclusions drawn. Attachment 8 Page 40 of 158 Table 1 THACKER STREET WITH GRACELAND AVENUE - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 2019 3 0 1 1 1 0 6 2020 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 6 0 2 1 3 0 12 Average/Year 1.2 -- <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -- 2.4 Table 2 THACKER STREET WITH LEE ROAD - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 1 0 5 0 7 2019 1 0 1 0 5 0 7 2020 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2021 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2022 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 Total 2 0 2 1 21 0 26 Average/Year <1.0 -- <1.0 <1.0 4.2 -- 5.2 Attachment 8 Page 41 of 158 Table 3 GRACELAND AVENUE WITH OAKWOOD AVENUE - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2019 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Average/Year -- -- <1.0 -- <1.0 -- <1.0 Table 4 LEE ROAD WITH OAKWOOD AVENUE – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2019 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2020 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 3 0 0 0 4 0 7 Average/Year <1.0 -- -- -- <1.0 -- 1.4 Attachment 8 Page 42 of 158 Table 5 THACKER STREET WITH JEANNETTE STREET – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Total 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- <1.0 Attachment 8 Page 43 of 158 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan The site, which is currently occupied by Contour Saws Inc., will be redeveloped to provide 50 townhomes. Each townhome will provide two garages and 13 guest parking will be provided on site. Access to the development will be provided via a full-movement access drive off Thacker Street located approximately 40 feet east of Laurel Avenue and a right-in/right-out access drive off Graceland Avenue located approximately 395 feet south of Thacker Street. Both access drives provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed development is included in the Appendix. Directional Distribution The directions from which residents and visitors of the development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the traffic to be generated by the proposed development. ed Development Attachment 8 Page 44 of 158 Attachment 8 Page 45 of 158 Development Traffic Generation The vehicle trip generation for the overall development was calculated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The “Multifamily Housing” (ITE Land-Use Code 220) rate was used for the proposed residential units. It should be noted that due to the location of the site within close proximity of the Des Plaines Metra Station, census data for the area indicates that five percent of the estimated trips to be generated by the proposed development will be via the public transportation, two percent will walk, and one percent will bike. However, in order to provide a conservative analysis, no reductions were applied. Table 6 shows the estimated vehicle trip generation for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours as well as daily traffic. Copies of the ITE trip generation worksheets are included in the Appendix. Table 6 SITE GENERATED TRIP ESTIMATES ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Weekday Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 220 Multifamily Housing (Low- Rise) 50 units 9 28 37 25 15 40 198 198 396 Trip Generation Comparison It should be noted that the site is currently occupied by an approximately 107,000 square-foot manufacturing building and parking lot. Table 7 indicates the trips estimated to be generated by the existing manufacturing site and the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed residential development and the future development of the supplemental parking serving the manufacturing building which is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Oakwood Avenue with Graceland Avenue (as discussed later in the report). A comparison between the future development`s generated trips and the manufacturing site shows that the trips estimated to be generated by the existing manufacturing site are approximately 50 percent higher during the weekday morning peak hour and 45 percent higher during the weekday evening peak hour. Attachment 8 Page 46 of 158 Table 7 TRIP COMPARISION ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Weekday Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 220 Multifamily Housing (Low- Rise)1 50 units 9 28 37 25 15 40 198 198 396 140 Manufacturing (~107,000 s.f.) 57 18 75 23 53 76 303 303 606 Difference -48 +10 -38 +2 -38 -36 -105 -105 -210 1 – Sum of both sites Attachment 8 Page 47 of 158 4. Projected Traffic Conditions The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. Development Traffic Assignment The estimated peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. Figure 6 illustrates the assignment of the vehicle traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed development. Background (No-Build) Traffic Conditions The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on 2050 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate for six years (one-year buildout plus five years) totaling three percent to represent Year 2029 total projected conditions. Additionally, the Year 2029 no-build traffic volumes include the traffic estimated to be generated by the following other area developments: x The trips generated by the Little Bulgaria Center located at 832 Lee Street were estimated and assigned to the roadway system. It should be noted that the pick-up and drop-off activities will take place off the east alley. x It is our understanding that 96 units of the Welkin Apartments located at 1425 Ellinwood Street are unoccupied. The estimated trip to the vacant units were estimated and assigned to the roadway system. x Trips estimated to be generated by a proposed residential development with 56 apartment units to be located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Oakwood Avenue with Graceland Avenue which is currently utilized as a parking lot for Contour Saws Inc. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The total projected traffic volumes include the Year 2029 no-build traffic volumes and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development (Figure 6). Figure 7 shows the Year 2029 total projected traffic volumes. Attachment 8 Page 48 of 158 Attachment 8 Page 49 of 158 Attachment 8 Page 50 of 158 5. Traffic Analysis and Recommendations The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Traffic Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing and future projected (Year 2029) traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic 11 software. The analysis for the traffic-signal controlled intersection was accomplished using actual cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing and Year 2029 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 8 through 11. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. Attachment 8 Page 51 of 158 Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – THACKER STREET WITH GRACELAND AVENUE – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Southbound Overall T/R L/T L T/R Existing Conditions Weekday Morning E – 59.1 D – 47.8 A 6.3 A 6.5 C 25.7 A – 6.4 Weekday Evening E – 59.0 E – 55.4 A 6.6 A 6.7 C 28.5 A – 6.7 Projected Conditions Weekday Morning E – 58.4 D – 46.8 A 7.3 A 7.6 C 26.5 A – 7.6 Weekday Evening E – 58.6 E – 56.7 A 7.1 A 7.4 C 29.5 A – 7.4 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn Attachment 8 Page 52 of 158 Table 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – THACKER STREET WITH LEE ROAD – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Overall L/T T R L/T/R Existing Conditions Weekday Morning C – 34.9 E 57.5 A 4.9 A – 9.6 C 22.9 D – 48.2 Weekday Evening C – 34.9 E 56.7 A 0.7 A – 9.5 C 22.5 D – 50.7 Projected Conditions Weekday Morning C – 34.0 E 57.8 A 4.9 B – 11.4 C 24.3 D – 49.3 Weekday Evening C – 34.9 E 56.6 A 0.9 B – 10.9 C 23.4 D – 50.8 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn Attachment 8 Page 53 of 158 Table 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – EXISTING CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection)1 x Westbound Approach B 11.0 B 11.0 Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection)1 x Eastbound Approach B 10.4 B 11.0 Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue1 x Eastbound Approach B 12.8 B 14.2 x Westbound Approach B 12.2 B 14.7 Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue1 x Southbound Approach B 10.2 B 12.3 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.7 A 8.1 Thacker Street with First Avenue1 x Southbound Approach B 11.2 B 12.3 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Jeannette Street with Thacker Street1 x Northbound Approach B 11.3 B 10.5 x Westbound Left Turn A 8.0 A 7.8 Thacker Street with Alley (West Alley)1 x Southbound Approach B 10.3 B 12.6 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.7 A 8.1 Thacker Street with Alley (East Alley)1 x Northbound Approach B 11.5 B 14.0 x Southbound Approach B 10.9 B 11.6 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 7.8 x Westbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.8 Oakwood Avenue with Alley1 x Southbound Approach A 8.4 A 8.5 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.2 A 7.2 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1- Two-Way Stop Control. Attachment 8 Page 54 of 158 Table 11 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS –PROJECTED CONDITIONS – UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection)1 x Westbound Approach B 11.5 B 11.4 Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection)1 x Eastbound Approach B 10.7 B 11.2 Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue1 x Eastbound Approach B 13.8 C 15.1 x Westbound Approach B 13.0 C 15.7 Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue1 x Southbound Approach B 10.5 B 12.7 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Thacker Street with First Avenue1 x Southbound Approach B 11.6 B 12.7 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Jeannette Street with Thacker Street1 x Northbound Approach B 11.8 B 10.7 x Westbound Left Turn A 8.0 A 7.8 Thacker Street with Alley (West Alley)1 x Southbound Approach B 10.7 B 13.2 x Eastbound Left-Turn A 7.8 A 8.1 Thacker Street with Alley (East Alley)1 x Northbound Approach C 15.3 B 13.8 x Southbound Approach B 11.9 B 12.3 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.9 x Westbound Left Turn A 7.9 A 7.8 Oakwood Avenue with Alley1 x Southbound Approach A 8.5 A 8.6 x Eastbound Left Turn A 7.3 A 7.3 Graceland Avenue with Proposed Access Drive1 x Eastbound Approach B 10.4 B 10.5 Thacker Street with Proposed Access Drive1 x Northbound Approach B 10.6 B 11.0 x Westbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.8 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1- Two-Way Stop Control. Attachment 8 Page 55 of 158 Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The eastbound approach currently operates at LOS E during both peak hours and the westbound approach operates at LOS D during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS E during the weekday evening peak hour. Additionally, the southbound approach operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, overall this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours with increases in delay of approximately one second or less. All the approaches are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during the peak hours with increases in delay of less than three seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the eastbound through movement is projected to be approximately 295 feet during the weekday evening peak hour and will extend to the west alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the westbound through movement is projected to be approximately 280 feet during the weekday evening peak hour and will extend to the east alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Lee Road The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The eastbound approach operates at LOS C during both peak hours and the westbound approach operates at LOS D during both peak hours. Additionally, the northbound approach operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, overall this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. The eastbound and westbound approaches are projected to operate at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the eastbound through movement is projected to be approximately 245 feet during the weekday morning peak hour and will extend to the east alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Attachment 8 Page 56 of 158 Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection) The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the westbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the westbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection) The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound and westbound approaches currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound and westbound approaches are projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour with increases in delay of approximately one second or less. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the eastbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Attachment 8 Page 57 of 158 Thacker Street with First Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the eastbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Jeannette Street The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the westbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the northbound approach and the westbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with West Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours and the eastbound left-turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn are projected to continue operating at the existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required Thacker Street with East Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The eastbound and westbound left-turn movements currently operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Attachment 8 Page 58 of 158 Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour with increases in delay of less than four seconds. The southbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The eastbound and westbound left-turn movements are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Oakwood Avenue with East Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach and the eastbound left- turn movement currently operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Graceland Avenue with Proposed Access Drive The proposed right-in/right-out access drive off Graceland Avenue will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during both peak hours. As such, this intersection will be adequate to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient access to the site. Thacker Street with Proposed Access Drive The proposed full movement access drive off Thacker Street provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the westbound left- turn movement is projected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours. As such, this intersection will be adequate to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient access to the site. Attachment 8 Page 59 of 158 Parking Evaluation As previously indicated, the proposed development will have approximately 50 townhomes including 33 three-bedroom units and 17 two-bedroom units. Each townhome will provide two garages and 13 guest parking spaces will be provided within the site. In order to determine the projected parking demand of the proposed development, the parking demand was estimated based on the City of Des Plaines Code of Ordinances and parking rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition. Based on the two methodologies, the parking demand for the proposed development is as follows: Parking Requirements of Proposed Development per City Code x Multifamily Housing (133 bedrooms) o 1.5 parking spaces per two-bedroom unit o 2.25 parking spaces per three-bedroom unit o One guest parking space is required per 4 townhomes Based on the above and the requirements of the City of Des Plaines, this translates into 113 parking spaces. It is also important to note that this ratio does not take into account the proximity of the site to the Metra train station. ITE Parking Generation Manual x Residential Use (Multifamily Housing Low-Rise – Land Use Code 221) o 1.21 parking spaces per unit o 0.75 parking space per bedroom Based on the above and the rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, that translates into approximately 100 parking spaces which results in a surplus of 13 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed parking supply meets ITE’s requirements of 100 parking spaces. Attachment 8 Page 60 of 158 6. Conclusion Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: x The volume of traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Des Plaines Metra train station. x The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. x Access to the development will be provided via a full-movement access drive off Thacker Street Located approximately 40 feet east of Laurel Avenue and a right-in/right-out access drive off Graceland Avenue located approximately 395 feet south of Thacker Street. Both access drives will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. x The proposed access drives will be adequate in accommodating the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure that a flexible access system is provided. x The proposed parking supply of 113 spaces will meet the City of Des Plaines and ITE requirements. Attachment 8 Page 61 of 158 REAL PROPERTY TAX BASE IMPACT The 2021 real property taxes for the property were $173,333. The anticipated real property taxes for the property after completion and occupancy of the proposed development will be $350,000 (2023 dollars). The taxes were estimated using recent tax bills for owner-occupied townhomes in Des Plaines as no solely for-rent townhome developments were found. To recent sales were found; 783 Lee Street valued at $455,249 and 8221 Lincoln valued at $453,000. The taxes for these units were $9,841 and $9,826 respectively, or approximately 2.2% of value. Using the estimated construction permit basis for each of the proposed townhomes of $300,000 and using a slightly more conservative 2.33% of value tax percentage to account for inflation, each town home would generate an approximate tax of $7,000 per year. Attachment 9 Page 62 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 63 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 68 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 74 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 75 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 76 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 77 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 78 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 79 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 80 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 81 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 82 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 83 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 84 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 85 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 86 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 87 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 88 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 89 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 90 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 91 of 158 1 Samantha Redman From: Sent:Monday, August 7, 2023 12:58 PM To:John Carlisle; Samantha Redman; Joanne Mendoza; Margaret Mosele Cc:Andrew Goczkowski; Jessica Mastalski; Mark Lysakowski; Mark Walsten; Colt Moylan; Sean Oskerka; Mike Charewicz; Dick Sayad; Carla Brookman; Patricia Smith Subject:For your consideration: Please pass these comments on to the zoning board re Contour Project At the meeting on July 25 re rezoning of Contour Saw project. I hope all of you sit back , read the concerns, and consider what will eventually may happen. I'm glad any decision was postponed at this meeting. Why not just rezone the properties for private homes /townhomes also. Better yet, a school and/or park - I have heard the schools are overcrowded. Also, Give other developers the opportunity for the sites. Maybe this developer would be interested going that route. You would get more interest in the property and hopefully a better plan for the neighborhood if the rezoning included private homes / townhomes. Eventually the inflation has to improve although it might take a while. So why rush into this. It was almost a relief about possible townhomes at Site A. After the bombshell that townhomes would be rentals, and reality set in - along with discussions with area residents- this is a worse scenario than the apartments . You would never be able to control the amount of residents living in a townhouse. Property values will go down, not up. Parking would still be a problem. Attachment 10 Page 92 of 158 2 If you had to keep apartments at Site B. You would have that money generated - and would be more reasonable for the discussion of future and present housing for seniors which was mentioned. The reality is there is a need for this now. The apartments would work at Site B. I agree. I'm all for senior housing. There are 3-5 year waiting lists for senior housing. I have friends who are on waiting lists. They would have additional parking for apartments if they moved the building back further to the west of Graceland. Reconfigure their plans. It would look nicer on Graceland if they did something like the Waterford Condos on Graceland did in front of their condo building. Attachment 10 Page 93 of 158 3 Attachment 10 Page 94 of 158 4 And learning the City took the first offer from one developer, this doesn't seem like a good business plan. Why the rush when you don’t even know what’s going to happen at the journal building site, or the rentals from Welkin and Ellison developments. I'm not certain, but aren't there other developments in the works in Des Plaines. I saw the figures about tax revenue - Approx. 43,000 taxes received now for properties Taxes from federal funding. Approx. 490,000 If it was private property- if 40 townhomes. Generate at least 10,000 -12,000 yearly taxes per unit. 480,000 for the property at Site A If townhomes were privately owned you would generate more taxes in the long run and not compromise the neighborhood. I walked this neighborhood with my granddaughter this past weekend. Such a great safe area with Centennial Park close by. Beautiful. People who own have a stake in the property take care of it. Seeing the townhomes around Mannheim and Touhy shows the future of what might eventually happen. Why not check with surrounding municipals (Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Rolling Meadows and other neighboring municipalities) if they have problems with this kind of a development in the middle of a quiet residential neighborhood. Have you looked into this builder’s credentials? I see one project pending. Talked to Skokie Rezoning….his development was approved but nothing has been done yet. I Attachment 10 Page 95 of 158 5 could not find any building developments he has completed. Wouldn't it be a good idea if this was postponed until you see how Skokie makes out with his development. With all the developments planned in Des Plaines, what is the rush. Right now, You have no idea about the quality and knowledge of the builder's building developments. I do know he was denied building in the City of Chicago at 2835-45 West Belden. The alderman at the time did not want the project. I could not get a reason for the denial. Hopefully, you have more information on the builder. There are other ways to get revenue for the city. Focus on downtown retail. Small shops, restaurants , snack shop would be a good thing close to train. Would love to see a dollar store These are my thoughts along with others. There are so many area residents who have no idea of what is going on, and many who do not have access to internet. I hope you all read next door. When these conversations come up, people have a lot to say but give up. Talking with residents re Webford project. — seems like they feel the resident's opinions in Des Plaines do not matter. Shame so many residents feel that way. Saw that with Kimchi project. Pushed it through because of a potential lawsuit……. Is that how Des Plaines works? Telling developers they are good to go before anything approved and finding out how residents feel about it. I was able to talk to the attorney and owners of the Kimchi project when I left the meeting. I wished them good Attachment 10 Page 96 of 158 6 luck. Very responsible and respectful…….hope it works out for them and Des Plaines residents nearby. Thank you for your consideration. And I hope your decisions don't reflect the term limits set - that many of these decisions are made in haste. I am sorry this happened. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone Chris at Attachment 10 Page 97 of 158 1 Samantha Redman From:Caryssa Buchholz Sent:Monday, August 7, 2023 10:47 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:Re: Contour Saws Site A Attachments:1924 Graceland-Thacker.jpg Samantha, Thank you for forwarding: I do have a few comments in regards to Site A: 1. With the newly proposed plan as townhomes, I believe this is even more a great opportunity than before to utilize a portion of the existing building on-site through re-use for planned components such as the club house. Despite several additions, there is a portion that appears more of the scale of a single family residence. This building dates back to the 1920s - back when the Contour Saws site was primarily single family residence - see attached Sanborn map. In addition, as you can see from the below newspaper clip and if one were to pull the original plat for the Des Plaines Manor subdivision, the triangle plots at the end of Laurel just above the article title is the site in question, which makes it a part of the original single family Garden City-esque subdivision layout. By preserving this single family structure already on the site, it not only honors the history of the city, it maintains the design or even returns the subdivision closer to its original intent and it creates a unique project that will set it apart from residential developments across our own city and every other neighboring city. 2. As for the new construction component, I would like to see more movement in the facades of the townhome designs. I believe them to be too minimalist per the concept renderings. The condominiums kiddy korner to them have stone lintels and ornamentation and the single family residences in the subdivision are very much craftsman in nature, each bearing their own unique character. While it is often cheaper to design a straight facade, I feel if there is not enough detail added in other manners, they can get stagnant/flat. I'd like to see more than just a slight dip at the roofline between units and a material transition to create that movement. I'd like to see detail added with things such as a cornice or window/door trim or juliet balconies or pilasters - minor things that could break the plane while still structurally maintaining a straight facade at a minimum. I also would like to see material choices become a bit more concise. Right now, the rendering indicates 2 colors of face brick, a veneer stone, and a fiber cement panel. I'd prefer to see this brought down to 2 material choices with a contrasting color palette of 2 colors. Attachment 10 Page 98 of 158 2 Attachment 10 Page 99 of 158 3 (Orange outlines buildings originally shown in attached 1924 Sanborn) Thanks in advance for your time, Caryssa Buchholz On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 3:22 PM Samantha Redman <sredman@desplaines.org> wrote: Hi Caryssa, Attached are the presentation documents from the discussion on 7/25. There is an issue uploading to the website, I’m investigating right now. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Attached is the conceptual plan and rendering. Please note the developer has not submitted an application yet for Site A and they are intending to submit later this month. Once submitted, any person is able to examine the application upon request, per section 12-3-1.D (i.e. we will email all plans to you if you ask). Prior to the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, all materials will be available on the website along with the staff report. Attachment 10 Page 100 of 158 4 Note: Site B was recommended for approval on 7/25. However, the petitioner has requested to postpone the City Council meeting for Site B until Site A has been through the Planning and Zoning Board so that both applications can be considered by City Council simultaneously. If you or another community member have comments, please send to me either through email or through the public input form on desplaines.org/contourplace. All comments go directly to our staff so we can incorporate them with our staff review and all public comments are included into the PZB staff report packet. Let me know if you have any questions, thank you. _________________________________________________________________________ How are we doing? Our department wants your feedback. Based on your recent experience with us, please take a few moments to complete this customer satisfaction survey. Samantha Redman Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5384 W: desplaines.org From: Caryssa Buchholz Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 2:21 PM To: Samantha Redman <sredman@desplaines.org> Subject: Contour Saws Site A Attachment 10 Page 101 of 158 5 Good Afternoon Samantha, I was just catching up on the Contour Saws Development Proposal and based on the audio from the Site B Planning and Zoning meeting held in July 25th, I believe there was mention that Site A was now being looked at for Townhome development and imagery was presented at the meeting. I didn't see any presentation documents online for Site A. Is that located somewhere where I could see the current proposal for Site A? Thanks, Caryssa Buchholz, AIA, LEED Green Assoc. Attachment 10 Page 102 of 158 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 10:05 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2699455 IP Address: 174.192.69.24 Submission Date: 09/13/2023 10:04 Survey Time: 40 minutes, 36 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design If Welkin is only 50%/not fully occupied (as well as more units coming on Webford)? Is the market telling you there is already enough units available? If these units are not fully occupied, I fear HUD units coming. Des Plaines needs patrons with HIGHER disposable income, not LOWER! Existing home sales are stagnant while new home construction is doing well. Why aren't we building townhouses? The Lee/Center downtown townhouses appear sold-out while Welkin 1/2 empty! How secure is bank line? What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? The green argument to charge for parking is just a diguise. It's just another way to upcharge the renter. If you live in the burbs, 95% of people have at least one car. Milenials are an increasing part of the first time home buying market which would support new townhome rationale. In terms of parking enforcement- Forget it. I've called into the DP police to enforce a Stop sign at my intersection. Dozens of cars run through it every day as no one cares. Welkin many cars park on Elin all day. How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Daily General Comments/Questions DP seems to be hitting the first and only real bid for the development. New home sales are is the only thing moving right now (existing homeowners with low mortgage rates are reluctant to move). Rental units feel saturated and am worried about units going HUD to fill them in the years ahead. Email (optional) Read-Only Content Thank you, Des Plaines, IL Attachment 10 Page 103 of 158 Attachment 10 Page 104 of 158 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Wednesday, September 27, 2023 11:02 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2728994 IP Address: 73.8.105.28 Submission Date: 09/27/2023 11:01 Survey Time: 16 minutes, 22 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design While I do think these buildings would look much nicer than the current factory and empty lot, please do not build anymore rentals. We need more home OWNERSHIP in Des Plaines. Condos are better than apartments. Empty rentals brings in low income housing which leads to increased crime and uneasy vibes residents do not want introduced. This will lead to residents choosing to leave Des Plaines, when the goal of the city is to bring people in. What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? Residents of Des Plaines want more than just housing. We need to keep the suburb vibe and not turn into a “city.” We need eateries, parks, and entertainment options. Des Plaines does not need to put a condo or apartment building in any space we can squeeze. With that said, if you just choose to put housing here, do condos and NOT apartments. Townhomes are too expensive for many homebuyers in this current market. How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Monthly General Comments/Questions Give the name “Des Plaines” a good name for other neighboring suburbs. We have bigger fish to fry…let’s make Des Plaines’ downtown compete with our neighbors, focus on crime, and work on getting more green space. Email (optional) Read-Only Content Thank you, Des Plaines, IL This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email. Attachment 10 Page 105 of 158 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Tuesday, October 31, 2023 1:16 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2796053 IP Address: 75.196.85.68 Submission Date: 10/31/2023 1:15 Survey Time: 10 minutes, 58 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design I live just East of the proposed area. I am kitty corner from Central School. This is a heavily populated area which only leads to the West side of Thacker/Lee Street becoming the same way. The cross walk at Laurel and Thacker/Dempster WON'T do A DAMN thing. The neon green sign put up by the school walk way does SHIT for the speaders. What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? The densley populated area, if they converted these to Buy, you MAY get a better clientel of prospective owners or buyers, such as empy nesters. What kind of market research was done in the area to propose renting versus buying? The old Grazianos property are being SOLD, what is the difference. Contour Saw location is much closer to the train and downtown. Please provide market research at next planning meeting! How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Weekly General Comments/Questions I grew up in DP, yeah I am sure you have heard that a lot! I bought in March 2022 in this area as I was starting to see changes, but now it seems the properties that have been sitting vacant for over 10 years are in the same condition or worse. Olivettis is a prime EXAMPLE.. The building is crumbling and that EYE sore in the back of the property could easily be a place for vagrants etc. Leonas is another empty spot. ARE THE LEASE prices to high for businesses to move in? DP couldn't even keep Panera . If DP could be even half of what MP is, the revenue that would be generated would skyrocket. Does DP think they are getting enough revenue from the Casino?? I am dumfounded by what I have seen over the last 40 plus years in town! Email (optional) Read-Only Content Attachment 10 Page 106 of 158 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org October 25, 2023 Mayor Goczkowski and Des Plaines City Council, CITY OF DES PLAINES Subject: Planning and Zoning Board, Zoning Text Amendments, Case # 23-040-MAP RE: Consideration of Zoning Map Amendment from M-2 to R-3, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), and a Tentative Plat of Subdivision Honorable Mayor and Members of the Des Plaines City Council: The Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) met on October 24, 2023 to consider the request: 1.The petitioner’s representative explained their requests to change the zoning to R-3, create a PUD, and consolidate the lots to create the envisioned townhouse development. The petitioner’s architect provided an overview of the site design for the 50-townhouse development, with a bedroom mix of 33 two-bedroom units and 17 three-bedroom units. The townhouses will be three stories and each unit will have a garage. Surface parking will be provided on the interior for guest parking spaces. The architect discussed the orientation of the buildings to the street and the location of the driveways. Building materials and facades were discussed. The landscaping, including the privately owned, publicly accessible park proposed on the north side of the property. The development will include public improvements including flashing beacon lights for pedestrians and a bump out to connect the park to the neighborhood. The representative’s traffic engineer delivered a presentation on the traffic study included with the packet and stated the conclusions of the study, that the traffic will not be significantly impacted by the proposed project and will be reduced due to the proximity to the Metra train station. The petitioner’s representative concluded the presentation describing the proposed improvements to the property and the requested exceptions for the PUD. 2.The board asked about how long the developer will be involved and if they will manage the property after it is built; the petitioner’s representative stated the petitioner plans to build and own the development and the development would be managed by a third-party property management company after construction is complete. 3.Staff provided the staff report, discussing the history behind the property, existing conditions and the requests. 4.The Board asked if the apartments at the proposed Graceland and Webford developments were considered in the traffic study. The petitioner’s representative stated the development may not be specifically included, but the study does factor in additional traffic generated by future projects. The Board asked about the footprint of the buildings and commented about the size of the bedrooms. The petitioner stated the layout is consistent with other similar developments and they were priced and designed for the market, but would take these concerns to the architect. 5.Public comment included questions about noise generated by the OWL lumber store next door; the commenter was affiliated with the lumber store and expressed concerns about the new residents of the building complaining about noise. Traffic was discussed by several members of the public concerned about the new development generating too much and the issue with speeding and the length of trains. Attachment 11 Page 107 of 158 Two members of the public spoke in favor of the project, stating any noise issues can be mitigated with building materials and were supportive of additional housing in this area. The petitioner’s representative responded to the concerns about traffic and noise, discussing the results of the traffic study, explaining how the traffic study was conducted, and describing how the previous manufacturing use would have generated more traffic and noise than what is proposed. 6. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended (6-0) that the City Council approve of the proposed requests for the zoning map amendment and the preliminary PUD and approved (6-0) the tentative plat of subdivision. Respectfully submitted, James Szabo Des Plaines Planning and Zoning Board, Chairman Cc: City Officials/Aldermen Attachment 11 Page 108 of 158 Case 23-039-MAP-PUD-TSUB 900 Graceland Ave and 1217 Thacker St Rezone, Preliminary PUD, Tentative Plat of Subdivision Case 23-061-TA Citywide Text Amendments Discussion 414 East Golf Road Workshop DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING October 24, 2023 MINUTES Pending Applications: 1. Address: 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street Case Number: 23-039-MAP-PUD-TSUB The petitioner has requested the following items: (i) a Map Amendment to rezone from M-2 General Manufacturing to R-3 Townhouse Residential District; (ii) a Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) with exceptions; (iii) a Tentative Plat of Subdivision to consolidate eight lots into two lots; and (iv) any other variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PINs: 09-20-105-016-0000, 09-20-105-017-0000, 09-20-105-020-0000, 09-20- 105-021-0000, 09-20-105-022-0000, 09-20-105-023-0000, 09-20-105- 024-0000, 09-20-105-045-0000 Petitioner: Luz and Associates #1, LLC, 2030 West Wabansia Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611 Owner: Contour Saws, Inc., 100 Lakeview Parkway, Ste. 100, Vernon Hills, 60061 Ward: #3, Alderman Sean Oskerka Existing Zoning: M-2, General Manufacturing Existing Land Use: Unoccupied manufacturing building Surrounding Zoning: North: M-1, Light Manufacturing and R-1, Single Family Residential South: R-4, Central Core Residential and C-3, General Commercial East: R-1, Single Family Residential and R-4, Central Core Residential West: Railroad and M-1, Light Manufacturing Surrounding Land Uses: North: Manufacturing building and single-family detached residences South: Multi-family residential buildings and vacant parking lot (proposed multi-family residential on this property) East: Railroad and manufacturing buildings Attachment 12 Page 109 of 158 West: Single-family detached and multi-family residential buildings Street Classification: Graceland Avenue is classified as a major road and under the ownership of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT); Thacker Street is classified as a secondary road and is under the ownership of the City of Des Plaines. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial is the recommended use for this property. Property/Zoning History: The subject property was previously the site of Contour Saws, a manufacturing facility operating from the 1960s to 2020. The property is currently improved with an approximately 105,000 square foot manufacturing facility, consisting of several joined buildings to create one large two-story building. The remainder of the property consists of surface parking. Sanborn maps from the 1920s indicate this site was previously a subdivision with half acre tracts of land with single-family detached residences.1 In the early 1960s the Contour Saws facility began operating at this site, using existing buildings and constructing additional buildings. Functionally, the facility is one joined building, including an original residence from the 1920s subdivision previously used for the office of Contour Saws. Zoning between the late 1920s and present day has shifted from residential to commercial to manufacturing on this property. The property is currently owned by Contour Saws and is unoccupied. On September 20, 2022, a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter was issued for the property from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). An NFR letter signifies that, while the site may have previously contained contaminants that exceeded state or federal limits, the IEPA does not deem this site to constitute a significant risk of harm. The NFR letter was pursued in response to a Phase II environmental review completed in 2016 indicating presence of contaminants in soil and groundwater, associated with the previous use at this property. After review of a Remedial Action Plan prepared in 2022, an NFR Letter was issued by IEPA stating the property is approved for residential, commercial, or industrial land use. However, any NFR letter typically specifies actions necessary for safe use of the 1 1924 Sanborn Map of Des Plaines Attachment 12 Page 110 of 158 property. For this property, the controls include the development of a safety plan for construction of the building to limit worker exposure, and the necessary asphalt/concrete barriers and types of foundation necessary for buildings. All of the controls must be maintained to maintain the certification of the NFR; if any violation of the controls is observed, the letter will be voided and enforcement actions would be implemented by the IEPA. The petitioner is aware of the NFR Letter and designed the project to be compliant with all the controls required to be in place. Project Description: Overview The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the Contour Saws parking lot on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing to build a 50-unit townhouse development and a private, publicly accessible park on the property. Proposal The proposal includes the removal of all existing buildings and structures to redevelop the subject property into a 50-unit townhouse Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed development consists of eight separate three story townhouse buildings with various numbers of units depending on the building. A publicly accessible, privately owned park is proposed at the north corner of the development with landscaped areas throughout the development. Refer to Architectural Plan attachment. The anticipated unit mix will be 33 three-bedrooms and 17 two- bedrooms, with a unit size ranging from approximately 2,200 to 2,500 square feet each. Refer to Floor Plan attachment. Each unit will have a two-car, attached garage and thirteen surface parking spaces are provided for guests on the site. MAP AMENDMENT Request Description: Zoning Map Amendment Overview The purpose of a zoning map amendment is to determine whether an existing zoning district is suitable for a location and, if not, which zoning district would be more suitable, given the context of the neighborhood, city goals, and local, state, and national development trends. Although a specific project can be considered alongside any zoning application, zoning change deliberation often looks at a property at a larger scale within the neighborhood and city. A Site Plan Review, as required by Section 12-3-2, was Attachment 12 Page 111 of 158 performed for the conceptual project at this site. The Site Plan Review contributes to the overall assessment of a zoning map amendment, demonstrating the feasibility of a specific project with this zoning. Refer to the Site Plan Review section of this report and associated attachments. M-2 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-3 Zoning The M-2, General Manufacturing zoning district is intended to accommodate a diversity of industrial uses. Out of all of the industrial districts, M-2 permits the largest number of different uses, allowing for 23 uses permitted by right (meaning no zoning entitlement process) and 24 conditional uses. A broad variety of uses are allowed by right, including light and heavy manufacturing, warehouses or distribution facilities, or food processing establishments. Few available properties exist in Des Plaines with the range of transit, recreational, and commercial opportunities available within walking distance, making this site an ideal location for additional residential versus commercial or manufacturing development. Within a half-mile of the property (an approximate 8–15-minute walk for the average person 2), the following services are available. Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment for further details. 2 Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speeds of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, page 17. Attachment 12 Page 112 of 158 A change to the zoning would be necessary to allow residential uses on this property. No residential uses are permitted within the M-2 zoning district. An analysis of the various options for residential zoning districts is necessary to determine what is best suited for this site. Below is a table of residential zoning districts and the residential uses permitted within them. A change to the zoning would be necessary to allow residential uses on this property. No residential uses are permitted within the M-2 zoning district. An analysis of the various options for residential zoning districts is necessary to determine what is best suited for this site. Below is a table of residential zoning districts and the residential uses permitted within them. Residential Districts Use Matrix Use R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Single Family Detached P C* C* C* Townhouse Not permitted Not permitted P P Two-family (duplex) Not permitted P Not permitted Not permitted Multi-Family Not permitted Not permitted P P *Note: Only applies to single-family detached dwellings that were lawfully constructed prior to August 17, 2020 and are located in a zoning district other than R-1. The R-1 and R-2 zoning districts would restrict the density of residential units at the property, limiting the development potential. Service Transit Des Plaines Metra Station platform; Pace Bus Stops for Lines 226, 230, and 250, and the PULSE Dempster Line Downtown Commercial Area Restaurants, grocery store, retail/personal services including dentist, optometrist, urgent care, physical therapist, private gym, and salons Schools (private and public) Central Elementary School, Willows Academy, Little Bulgarian School, Islamic City Center of Des Plaines Academy Parks Centennial Park, Central Park, Paroubeck Park, Potowatomie Park Public Buildings Library, City Hall Attachment 12 Page 113 of 158 As the name suggests, the R-1, Single Family Residential district limits the number of dwelling units to one dwelling unit per parcel. The R-2, Two-Family Residential district similarly limits the number of dwellings to two units per parcel. To allow for more than one or two residences on this 3.13-acre property, the property would need to be subdivided. If the property were subdivided to meet the R-1 or R-2 bulk standards, it is unlikely the property could produce 50 units, even with a planned unit development. Comparatively, a townhouse or multi-family development would supply a greater number of units in the same amount of space, creating a more efficient and economical option for this location. For the contemplated project, the R-3 zoning district was selected by the petitioner because this zoning best fits the intended scale and purpose of the development. Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population The existing housing stock throughout the city is predominantly single-family residential and the Comprehensive Plan states it is a goal to maintain this stock of high-quality single family residential property within the city. However, the detached single family housing type is an increasingly unaffordable product for many existing and future residents. In comparison, townhouses provide additional housing stock at a more financially attainable scale due to the smaller size and reduced maintenance cost. An important goal of 2019 Comprehensive Plan is to provide avenues to allow residents to age-in-place and improve accessibility. As of 2015, the percentage of Des Plaines residents 50 or older was 40.2%, compared to the regional average of 31.4%.3 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, this percentage is likely to grow, with one in five Americans at retirement age by 2030.4 Households approaching retirement are frequently interested in downsizing to limit maintenance costs and reduce monthly housing costs to meet limitations of fixed incomes. Supplying a diverse housing stock in this area provides the option for seniors to continue living within the city. A residential development in this location would be close enough to facilities and services for an aging population to independently complete activities of daily living, with many amenities available within walking or transit distance. With these considerations regarding the location of the property near multi- family properties and zoning, the proximity to numerous private and public services, and the goals of the Attachment 12 Page 114 of 158 Comprehensive Plan focused on providing diversity of housing stock and providing accessible and attainable options for residents, senior or otherwise, the R-3 zoning district is a suitable fit for this property. Site Plan Review Proposed Project Overview The petitioner proposes 50 townhouse units, including 33 three- bedroom units and 17 two-bedroom units and a publicly accessible, private park space. The proposed development is one of two for the former Contour Saws properties. The parking lot of the former Contour Saws facility is proposed to be a 56-unit multifamily development; a petition to change the zoning from C-3 to R-4 was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) on July 25, 2023. 3 Des Plaines 2019 Comprehensive Plan, Page 32 https://www.desplaines.org/home/showpublisheddocument/162/637612522934400000 4 U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Older People Projected to Outnumber Children for First Time in U.S. History, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html Attachment 12 Page 115 of 158 This type of development is a permitted use in the proposed R-3 Townhouse, with a PUD. The below diagram illustrates staff’s interpretation of where the required yards are located for this property, as noted in Section 12-7-2 and defined in Section 12-13-3. R-3 -Central Core Residential District Bulk Standards Bulk Controls Required Proposed Maximum height 45 ft. 34 ft. Minimum front yard 25 ft. 12 ft.1 Minimum corner side 10 ft. 10 ft. Minimum rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum lot width 55 ft. 516.72 ft Minimum lot area 2800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit * 50 units = 140,000 sq. ft. 130,406 sq. ft.2 1 Exception request with PUD to reduce required front yard. 2 Exception request with PUD to reduce minimum lot area. Publicly accessible private parking lot excluded from total lot area. Site Plan Review Standards Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, a Site Plan Review is required for all map amendment requests to assess how the request meets the characteristics identified in Section 12-3-2, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the current Site Plan provided by the petitioner, located in the Site Plan attachment. Attachment 12 Page 116 of 158 Site Plan Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) The arrangement of structures on the site The arrangement of open space and landscape improvements • Places buildings along the street frontage, rather than garages or surface parking. The design presents better cohesion with the buildings surrounding it by placing the building at approximately the same distance from the property line as the existing building and the adjacent existing and proposed multi- family buildings. The proximity of the building to the street also provides better surveillance within the neighborhood, with windows facing the residential neighborhood and providing additional “eyes on the street.” • The design of each townhouse includes a two car, attached garage, providing covered parking in a more compact manner than surface parking. Guest spaces are located in the center of the property. The site layout minimizes view of the parking area and interior roadway, with the buildings as the primary focus along the street. • A subdivision is requested as part of this request. Improvements deemed necessary in the area adjacent to a subdivision can be required pursuant to Section 13-3-2.L. The improvements required to serve this development are discussed in the Public Works and Engineering (PWE) Department Memo attachment. Improvements are required prior to completion of the development or within 2 years of the recorded subdivision. A summary of the improvements includes replacement of a water main in a portion of Graceland Avenue, construction of pedestrian bump out and flashing pedestrian signage at the intersection of Thacker and Laurel, replacement of a streetlight on Graceland Avenue, and grinding and resurfacing Thacker Street as well as replacement of any damaged public sidewalk. • Landscaping is provided around and within the development meeting zoning requirements. In addition, a park space is proposed, as noted on the plans and the Park Concept Plan attachment. Refer to Landscape Plane attachment for details on landscaping. • Parkway trees and landscaping proposed along Graceland Avenue, where none currently exist. • A Solid wood fence is proposed along the railroad track to screen the railroad from the development. A condition of approval requires an open fence at the northwest corner of the park to alleviate any sight obstruction between the railroad and Thacker Street. Attachment 12 Page 117 of 158 The adequacy of the proposed circulation system on the site • Several driveways will be closed along Graceland Avenue, with one driveway entrance/exit proposed on Graceland Avenue and one along Thacker Street. The existing driveway along Thacker is not aligned with Laurel Avenue. The proposed plan aligns the driveway to this street. The closure of these extra driveways and replacement with a parkway and walkway improves safety and comfort of pedestrians along Graceland and Thacker. • Pedestrian circulation is provided by numerous walkways from Graceland and Thacker from each unit to the existing public sidewalk or to sidewalks withing the development. The proposed plan includes bump outs at the intersection of Thacker and Laurel to improve pedestrian safety to and from the publicly accessible park and the adjacent neighborhood. • Vehicular circulation is provided by interior, private roads accessed from two driveways, one along Graceland Avenue and one along Thacker Street. The roads are 26 feet in width, exceeding the maximum required width (22 ft) for a two- way drive aisle per Section 12-9-6. The location, design, and screening of proposed off-street parking areas • Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12-9-7, providing two spaces per residential unit (50 garage spaces) and one space per four units (13 guest spaces, in surface parking area) which is the minimum required amount. • It is anticipated, as discussed in the petitioner’s response to standards and the provided traffic study, that the proximity of the site to numerous transit options and a bike route along Thacker St, will reduce dependence on automobiles for this project. • Attached garages are proposed with each unit, facing interior, private roads within the development rather than connecting to the street. The proposed site is situated in such a way that guest parking is located in the middle and has minimal visibility from Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street. Landscaping is provided along driveways. The adequacy of the proposed landscaping design on the site • All required landscaping in terms of foundation landscaping, parkway landscaping, and overall site landscaping are provided (pursuant to Sections 12-10-6, 12-10-7 and 12-10- 10). Landscaping, either turf, bushes or trees are provided throughout the development. Refer to Landscape Plan. • The park along Thacker Street is proposed to be a publicly accessible park space, providing additional landscaping and recreational opportunities. Attachment 12 Page 118 of 158 S u m m a r y o f P u b l i c O u t r e a c h I n a n e ffort to improve community engagement and transparency surrounding new, large developments within Des Plaines, the City provided numerous opportunities for residents to review the proposal and provide input. To provide regular project updates, a webpage on the city website was created: desplaines.org/contourplace. On June 6, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Board hosted a public workshop to provide the developer, board, and the public an opportunity to review plans and provide input into the proposed development at this location and the former Contour Saws facility to the north of this property. During the July 25, 2023 PZB meeting, the petitioner provided an updated site plan depicting townhouses instead of multi-family residential buildings. The project webpage was launched prior to the PZB workshop to share details about the proposed projects and includes a public input form to continuously gather community comments. Refer to Public Comment attachment for all public comments. The design, location, and installation of proposed site illumination • Photometric plan demonstrates conformance with Section 12-12-10, with no more than 0.2-foot candles spilling over the property line in any location, well within the limits of the zoning ordinance. • The parking lot is properly illuminated, with at least 0.1 footcandles in any parking area, meeting requirements of Section 12-9-6.G. A condition of approval is to provide additional illumination at the driveways entering the development on Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street. The correlation of the proposed site plan with adopted land use policies, goals, and objectives of the comp. plan • Does not fit the manufacturing use illustrated by the Comprehensive Plan; however, the 2019 plan was written under the assumption that the Contour Saw facility would continue operating. • The proposed plan supports the following goals (refer to M-2 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-3 Zoning section of this report for further details): o Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs. o Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points. • In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. • The creation of a separate parcel for a privately owned, publicly accessible park provides additional recreational opportunities, which is supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Attachment 12 Page 119 of 158 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) Request Description: Overview The proposed development includes eight separate “principal buildings.” Section 12-13-3 of the Zoning Ordinance defines a “principal building” as “a nonaccessory building in which a principal use of the lot, on which it is located, is conducted.” Pursuant to Section 12-7-1.A, not more than one principal building or structure can be located on a zoning lot, except in certain cases. In this circumstance, a planned development, as defined below, is the only case suitable for the proposal. “A development occurring on a parcel under single ownership or unified control which is developed as a unit and includes two (2) or more principal buildings or uses and is processed under the planned development procedure of this title” (Section 12-13-3). The purpose of a PUD is to promote a unified development by providing flexibility in development standards to accommodate site conditions and encourage innovative use of land. Certain characteristics are required by Section 12-3-5.A of the Zoning Ordinance, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the attached Preliminary PUD Plat provided by the petitioner. Preliminary PUD Plat Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) A maximum choice in the types of environments available to the public by allowing a development that would not be possible under the strict application of the other sections of this title Allows for construction of a development on an irregularly shaped parcel and provides an additional housing option with increased density and multiple principal buildings that is not permitted without a PUD in the Zoning Ordinance. Permanent preservation of common open space and recreation areas and facilities Creates a publicly accessible, private park where none exists currently. Landscaping and open space is provided around and between residential units and the private road as well as along Graceland Avenue, where landscaping was limited or non- existent before. A pattern of development to preserve natural vegetation, topographic and geologic features No significant natural vegetation, topographic or geologic features exist on site that would be beneficial to maintain. However, allowing for additional buildings breaks up the site so landscaping can be provided between buildings and sufficient area is available for a park and open space. A creative approach to the use of land and related physical facilities that results in better development and design and the construction of aesthetic amenities Building design/layout provides a defined separation between paved areas and common space; provides adequate screening between these areas and neighboring lots. An efficient use of the land resulting in more economic networks of utilities, streets and other facilities Reduces curb cuts onto both streets and ties into existing utilities and facilities. The traffic study provided by the petitioner (refer to attachments) did not indicate any substantial impact to traffic in the area compared to the manufacturing use previously operating in this location for decades. Attachment 12 Page 120 of 158 A land use which promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare Transforms a presently vacant site with dilapidating manufacturing structures to create a use that includes more visual appeal, additional landscaping and recreational opportunities, and adds additional residential housing stock in a suitable area. Prerequisites: Location, Ownership, and Size PUDs are authorized in all zoning districts in the City subject to the regulations in Section 12-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance and are required to be under single ownership and/or unified control. While the subject property is currently not owned by the petitioner, the petitioner does intend to take ownership of the property upon approval of the requests in this application. Because the development will involve rental units with one property management and maintenance entity, a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) is not required at this time; however, a condition of approval states if the development is subdivided into separate, fee-simple townhouse units, an HOA must be established to manage and maintain the proposed PUD. PUD Bulk Exceptions As identified in the R-3 Bulk Regulations table, the proposal does not meet the minimum front yard size and does not meet the minimum lot area, requiring a PUD exception from Section 12-3-5.C.2 (Perimeter Yards) and Section 12-3-5.C. The exceptions allow for a development that efficiently uses the irregularly shaped parcel in a way that would not be possible under the strict application of the code. Parking Requirement Pursuant to Section 12-9-7, a townhouse (single-family attached) residential use requires a minimum of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit plus one common guest space for every four dwelling units. The proposed 50-unit PUD requires a minimum of 100 off-street parking spaces and 13 common guest spaces. The attached PUD Site Plan indicates two covered off-street garage spaces for each unit and guest parking provided by thirteen standard spaces, including one accessible space in an interior parking area of the development. . TENTATIVE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION Request Description: Overview The proposal includes a consolidation of the property from eight lots to two lots. One lot will be 130,406 square feet, proposed to be developed with the townhouses and associated structures. A second lot, 6,182 square feet, is proposed to be a publicly accessible, private park space. The attached Tentative Plat of Subdivision, titled 1217 Thacker Street Consolidation, shows the location and boundaries of each lot. Attachment 12 Page 121 of 158 Easements The Tentative Plat shows both existing and proposed easements. Proposed easements include storm sewer, watermain, sanitary sewer, and a general public utility and drainage easement, depicting both drainage on the site and the proposed unground vault to accommodate stormwater. Subdivision Improvements The Department of Public Works and Engineering (PWE) has provided comments (attached) based on the submittal. The memo states the following is required with this subdivision, to be finalized at the final plat of subdivision stage: 1. Grind and re-surface eastbound lane on Thacker Street. 2. Add 8” water main to replace 4” water main along a portion of Graceland Avenue. 3. Add pedestrian crosswalk crossing on Thacker Street including a bump- out, striping, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB). 4. The sole streetlight along Graceland Avenue must be replaced and electrical conduit undergrounded. The petitioner will work with staff and ComEd to coordinate this replacement. Section 13-3-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance discusses required improvements for subdivided properties and timelines for the improvements. Improvements are approved by the City Council during the final plat of subdivision process and financial guarantees for improvements are included within the resolution. In addition, Section 13-4-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance discusses dedication of park lands and/or fees in lieu for subdivisions. The publicly accessible, private park will count for a portion of the required park land dedication and any remainder will require a fee in lieu, to be calculated at the time of final plat of subdivision, approved by the Park District, and included with the final approved City Council resolution to subdivide the property. Note the petitioner’s request is for a Tentative Plat only at this time. The steps for Final Plat are articulated in Sections 13-2-4 through 13-2-8 of the Subdivision Regulations. The Final Plat of Subdivision will occur at a later date and will be a concurrent process with the Final PUD plat. All necessary dedications, fees, and necessary improvements will be outlined in the final subdivision resolution. Attachment 12 Page 122 of 158 Standards for Zoning Map Amendment: The following is a discussion of standards for zoning map amendments from Section 12-3-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance. Rationale for how well the proposal addresses the standards is provided below and in the attached petitioner responses to standards. The Board may use the provided responses as written as its rationale, modify, or adopt its own. 1. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the City Council; The Comprehensive Plan was written in 2019 when the Contour Saws facility was still operating. Due to the manufacturing facility’s longstanding operations in Des Plaines, the Comprehensive Plan did not envision this area to be used for anything else. However, the proposed amendment and development would meet several goals from the Housing chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, including Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs and Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points. to “Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population” and “M-2 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-3 Zoning” sections of this report for further details. In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with current conditions and the overall character of existing development; The subject property is adjacent to R-4 zoning to the northeast and south and is close to several multifamily developments. The area is in close proximity to numerous services within walking, biking or transit distance. Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment. Any proposed development would need to meet all building material and design requirements outlined in Section 12- 3-11 – Building Design Review, including requirements for face brick, which will be similar in material to the many adjacent single family and multi-family residential buildings in this neighborhood. 3. Whether the proposed amendment is appropriate considering the adequacy of public facilities and services available to this subject property; An engineering and utility plan was prepared with this application. Based on the provided site plan, City engineering staff did not indicate any concerns with the adequacy of public facilities or services being available to meet the needs of this proposed development. A traffic impact study was provided with this application to assess impacts of the proposed development (Refer to Traffic Study attachment). The study indicated the traffic generated by this use would not create a significant impact on the surrounding street network. It is important to note the previous use of this property was a manufacturing use, including a parking lot on site with a large loading/unloading dock into the facility, approximately 25 parking spaces on site, and over one hundred spaces in a surface parking lot across the street (Site B of this development), while the proposed residential development provides 90 spaces within attached garages on the townhouses and 16 guest spaces. At minimum, this development brings less potential for vehicles to be travelling in and out of the site at peak hours versus large trucks delivering or picking up in the loading dock and over one hundred employees of a manufacturing facility. Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12-9-7, providing 106 spaces, which is in excess of the minimum required amount. Attachment 12 Page 123 of 158 4. Whether the proposed amendment will have an adverse effect on the value of properties throughout the jurisdiction; and The proposed map amendment would allow for residential uses on a property that has been zoned manufacturing within a residential area for decades and operated as a more intensive use in the past. A building that provides additional residential options for the area and follows the Building Design Standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance creates a more appealing urban design for the neighborhood versus a large manufacturing facility. 5. Whether the proposed amendment reflects responsible standards for development and growth. The current use of this property is a vacant manufacturing facility that is unlikely to be filled with another similar manufacturing business. Providing a residential use for the property, particularly a use that capitalizes on the close proximity to downtown Des Plaines and the various amenities associated with the area, would present a more efficient and effective way to use this property. As discussed in the Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population section, the City needs to promote opportunities that increase housing stock for a diversity of populations in the area, both in the short term and long term. Amending the zoning district for this property, regardless of the proposed project, provides an additional opportunity to construct a townhouse development, a transitional density development between single family residential and multi-family residential buildings and with the necessary services to support this type of use. PUD Findings of Fact: The following is a discussion of standards for PUDs from Section 12-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rationale for how well the proposal addresses the standards is provided below and in the attached petitioner responses to standards. The Board may use the provided responses as written as its rationale, modify, or adopt its own. 1. The extent to which the Proposed Plan is or is not consistent with the stated purpose of the PUD regulations in Section 12-3-5.A of this title: The proposed townhouse PUD generally aligns with the stated purposes of PUDs as analyzed in the Preliminary PUD Plat Review table above with a proposed multiple principal building development, designated open spaces and landscaping and separate vehicular and pedestrian areas, all of which foster public health, safety, and general welfare for residents. Refer to Petitioner’s Response to Standards for a full analysis of how the development meets each standard. 2. The extent to which the proposed plan meets the prerequisites and standards of the planned unit development regulations: The proposal meets the ownership/unified control and size requirements in the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the applicable zoning and subdivision regulations otherwise applicable to the subject property, including, but not limited to the density, dimension, area, bulk, and use and the reasons why such departures are or are not deemed to be in the public interest: The proposal meets the majority of the bulk regulations in Section 12-7-2.J of the Zoning Ordinance (See Site Plan Review section above) but requires exceptions from the required front yard and the 2,800-square- foot minimum lot area requirement. The proposed density is a moderate density compared to the surrounding single-family and multi-family developments in the area, providing additional housing stock in the City. The front yard building setback deficiency is located on the south side of the lot, which faces existing and proposed multi-family residential developments with an R-4 zoning and has a smaller required front yard than the R-3 zoning district of this proposed project. Proposed landscaping along the parkway and around the perimeter of the proposed townhouse PUD Attachment 12 Page 124 of 158 provides a buffer between this property and any adjacent uses. In addition, the proposed development improves the current conditions of the subject property. 4. The extent to which the physical design of the proposed development does or does not make adequate provision for public services, provide adequate control of vehicular traffic, provide for, protect open space, and further the amenities of light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment: The proposed design of the townhouse PUD and layout of residential buildings allows for recreational space on property, reduces the number of curb cuts, concentrates vehicular traffic in the center of the development, and encourages pedestrian activity on Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street by extending walkways from each townhouse to the public sidewalk. Refer to the Traffic Study for details on anticipated traffic impact. The development is not anticipated to generate traffic that exceeds the amount of traffic previously generated for the industrial development at this property. In addition, no changes are proposed to the adjacent railway and at grade crossings. Questions were raised from members of the community about the proximity of the development to the rail line. The development is not proposed to be any closer than the existing development to the railroad track, and much of the area adjacent to the track is proposed to be open space. There are two at grade crossings adjacent to the property. Per documents from the Federal Railroad Administration crossing inventory, 22 trains a day (on average) pass along the rail line adjacent to the property. Accident history at these crossing indicates a total of five accidents associated with the crossing have occurred since 1975, and no accident reports have been filed within the last decade5. 5. The extent to which the relationship and compatibility of the proposed development is beneficial or adverse to adjacent properties and neighborhood: The proposal creates a moderate density residential development compared to the surrounding single- family and multi-family developments in the area, creating a transitional density on this property and providing additional housing stock in the City. The proposed development redevelops an industrial property--that no longer fits within this residential neighborhood and is near the commercial areas in downtown Des Plaines--and provides transit options to support the economic vitality of the area. 6. The extent to which the proposed plan is not desirable to physical development, tax base, and economic well-being of the entire community: The proposal would provide additional housing stock that helps to increase the tax base for the City and improve the economic well-being of Des Plaines. It would also provide extra economic benefit through utility and public service fees that are currently not eligible for the subject property at this time. Refer to the Real Property Tax Base Impact attachment provided by the petitioner. 7. The extent to which the proposed plan is in conformity with the recommendations of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan: The proposal increases housing stock and creates additional housing options for residents, which aligns with the housing goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. It also redevelops an unoccupied industrial property in an area close to commercial and transit opportunities, which is promoted by the Comprehensive Plan. 5 Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Analysis – Crossing Inventory and Accident Reports for Crossings 689657J and 689658R - Revision Date 07/05/2023; accessed from https://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/PublicSite/Crossing/Crossing.aspx Attachment 12 Page 125 of 158 PZB Procedure and Recommended Conditions: Under Section 13-2-3 (Planning and Zoning Board’s Procedure) of the Subdivision Regulations, the PZB has the final authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Tentative Plat of Subdivision request at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street. Under Section 12-3-5.D.2.c (Procedure for Review and Decision for PUDs) and Section 12-3- 7.D (Procedure for Review and Decision for Amendments) of the Zoning Ordinance, the PZB has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve with modifications, or deny the Map Amendment and Tentative Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street. The City Council has final authority on these requests. The PZB should take the following motions. The zoning motions can be combined or taken individually: Zoning Recommendations to City Council • A motion pursuant to Section 12-3-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance to recommend to City Council to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the proposed Map Amendment; • A motion pursuant to Section 12-3-5.E of the Zoning Ordinance to recommend to City Council to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the request for a Conditional Use for a Preliminary PUD, with exceptions for minimum required front yard and minimum lot area; and Subdivision Approval (Tentative Plat) • A motion pursuant to Section 13-2-2 of the Subdivision Regulations to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Tentative Plat of Subdivision. If the PZB recommends approval, staff recommends the following conditions for the Tentative PUD. Conditions of Approval: 1. In the event the property is sold, and a property owner desires to sell separate, fee-simple townhouse units, a Plat of Subdivision will be necessary to create separate lots and a Homeowner’s Association or similar unified control entity must be established along with any covenants, conditions, and restrictions governing maintenance of common areas. 2. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD plat, all public improvements must be noted on plans and all engineering comments addressed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Engineering. 3. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD Plat, the landscape plan must be revised in the park area closest to Thacker Street between Laurel Avenue and the railroad track. Bushes and a semi- open fence (wrought iron or chain link) should be placed around the north corner of the proposed park to allow visibility for traffic from Thacker Street. Attachment 12 Page 126 of 158 4. At time of final subdivision and PUD Plat, the photometric plan must be revised to include lighting at the entrances of both driveways. Any new lighting must be in conformance with Section 12-12-10 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Each townhouse unit shall have separate water and sanitary sewer services. 6. All electrical lines on the property must be installed underground. Chair Szabo swore in Rolando Acosta, Attorney, Keith Lee, Architect with FitzGerald Architects and Javier Millan, KLOA representative. Mr. A costa presented an overview of the proposed project. Mr. Lee reviewed the site design. The proposed development consists of 50 townhomes: 33 two- bedrooms and 17 three-bedrooms. All townhomes are three stories with an internal garage. Parking on the interior of the development limits the need for curb cuts. One curb cut aligns with the existing street across Thacker Street, which is Laurel Avenue. Because the townhomes are front facing there will be more ‘eyes on the street’. A park is proposed for the north side of the property and parkway trees will be added along Graceland Avenue. Most of the material used is brick, with limited fiber cement. The façade is undulating with alternating colors and changing angled rooflines. Mr. Millan explained that the traffic study was conducted in the morning and evening, at 10 locations, during the peak hours of 8:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:45-5:45 p.m. The study also included the railroad crossing at Graceland Av enue. During the morning peak hours, there were three crossing events. During evening peak hours there were four railroad crossing events. Traffic did not back up beyond Laurel Avenue in the morning but did once in the evening for a duration of 45 seconds. Mr. Acosta highlighted the proposal. There are few sites available for such a proposal. This proposal meets the Comprehensive plan goals for differentiated housing. Building to the R-3 with 11’ less building height than that code would allow and with a reduction of the required lot square footage. If the park could be included – and it can’t because it’s a separate subdivision – it would be just 2% less than the requirement of square footage space. The current improvements are almost all building and pavement. They are providing the park, plus publicly available improvements such as a bump out pedestrian crossing on Thacker Street that includes signage with flashing lights, replacement light with buried electric on Graceland Avenue, among other improvements planned. The 113 parking spaces meet all the City of Des Plaines requirements. Member Weaver questioned how long the developer will be involved once the project is completed. Mr. Acosta explained that the petitioner plans to build and own the development. The development will be managed by a third-party property management company after construction is complete. Senior Planner Redman highlighted items from a slide presentation. Mr. Millan answered questions asked by Member Catalano. Member Veremis asked if the apartments at Graceland Aven ue and Webford Av enue were considered in the traffic study. Mr. Acosta responded that the development was not included specifically, because they were not aware of it, but the study does factor in additional traffic generated by future projects. Attachment 12 Page 127 of 158 John Jossund, 926 S. Graceland Avenue, is a representative of Owl Lumber located next to the proposed development and has been at that location for 34 years. Mr. Jossund is concerned that residents may complain about the noise from the lumber company. There is a dust collector that sounds like a jet engine in the morning. Rick Wilson, 1340 E. Walnut Ave nue, opposes the development for two reasons: density and traffic. Mr. Wilson asked if the pedestrian bump out on Thacker Avenue will cause loss of a traffic lane. Ms. Redman responded that it would not and reviewed the exhibit on the slide. Oscar Hernandez, 1095 Oakwood, does not feel that the traffic study is accurate. The study addresses the Metra trains, but not the freight trains that back up traffic. Mr. Hernandez addressed speeding in the area and does not believe that renters have the same at stake as an owner. Hannah Pair, 774 Arlington Avenue, provided videos of the trains to staff and explained that there is a loud noise when the train goes over the crossing. Ms. Pair also expressed concern over a transformer that is located too close to the buildings, pet owners not picking up after their pets, and requested a sign be erected on the corner for a pedestrian crossing. Govana Baig, 880 Lee, stated that she understands that noise is always a challenge for the builder, however particular material and landscaping can be used to minimize the sound. She approves of the development; townhomes typically attract middle-class families with jobs, not short-term renters. Mary Scanlon, 828 Graceland, is concerned about the additional traffic and the fact that the units are rentals. Ms. Scanlon would prefer a development geared towards senior citizens and believes that the traffic study is inaccurate. The crossings are closed for more than 51 seconds when a Metra train passes the crossing. Joe Weber, 944 Margaret Street, would like the Planning and Zoning Board to consider more open space as further developments come into the City. Ahmed Kadir, 880 Lee Street, approves the project because of the law of supply and demand and the stability to property taxes. Less restrictive zoning in the past has made Des Plaines more affordable than our neighboring towns. Mr. Kadir b elieves they should continue to allow these projects and ignore the vocal minority. This proposed development decreased from 100 down to 50 units already, lessening the traffic. Francine Grossi, 1591 E Thacker, requested the website address for this project. Ms. Redman informed the public that if anyone has a comment to please send her an email or enter it through the public input form on desplaines.org/contourplace. All comments go directly to staff so the comments will be incorporated with staff review and included in the PZB staff report packet. Mr. Acosta responded to the questions from the public. The traffic study showed that there will be 38 fewer vehicular trips in the morning, 56 fewer in the afternoon, 242 trips fewer in a week than if Contour Saws reopened, or if there was another commercial/industrial use at the location. A greenbelt and a fence will separate the townhomes from Owl Lumber. Attachment 12 Page 128 of 158 Mr. Millan explained that this project will produce 50% less traffic during the peak hours and 35- 40% less on a daily basis than it would be for industrial or commercial use. No accidents are reported from 2018 to 2022 at Thacker Street and Laurel Avenue. Unfortunately determining traffic from freight trains is difficult since they are not on a time schedule. Only Metra trains were included as part of the traffic study. Member Saletnik asked what the size of a condo was in the initial plan compared to the new townhome proposal. Barry Sidel, Petitioner, was sworn in. The original plan was comprised of 122 apartments of 800-900 square feet and a 4-5 story building. The townhouses have an average size of 2,000-2,200 square feet including the garage. The monthly rent is $3,800 to $4,000. A p roperty management company will take care of the property. Mr. Sidel is looking for long-term renters; it costs too much to be without a tenant. Member Saletnik would like the interiors reworked. He has concerns with the master bedroom being too small and a lack of storage. Member Veremis said the townhomes that she’s recently toured are similar, not very large, and that this is common in the market right now. Mr. Sidel responded that this is the same layout as an apartment of that size. The pricing has to be matched with square footage. If there is more square footage, then the cost will go up. These are priced and designed for the market, but he will take these concerns into account and discuss this with his architect. A motion was made by Board Member Weaver, seconded by Board Member Catalano pursuant to Section 12-3-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance to recommend approval to the City Council a Map Amendment for 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street. AYES: Weaver, Hofherr, Veremis, Szabo, Catalano, Saletnik NAYES: None ABSENT: Fowler ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY ** A motion was made by Board Member Weaver, seconded by Board Member Catalano pursuant to Section 12-3-5.E. of the Zoning Ordinance to recommend approval to the City Council a Conditional Use for a Preliminary PUD, with exceptions for minimum required front yard and minimum lot area with the conditions in the staff report. AYES: Weaver, Hofherr, Veremis, Szabo, Catalano, Saletnik NAYES: None ABSENT: Fowler ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY ** A motion was made by Board Member Weaver, seconded by Board Member Catalano pursuant to Section 13-2-2 of the Subdivision Regulations to approve the Tentative Plat of Subdivision AYES: Weaver, Hofherr, Veremis, Szabo, Catalano, Saletnik NAYES: None ABSENT: Fowler ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY ** Attachment 12 Page 129 of 158 CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE Z - 33 - 23 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAT FOR 900 GRACELAND AVENUE AND 1217 THACKER STREET (CASE #23-039-MAP-PUD- SUB). WHEREAS, Luz and Associates #1, LLC ("Developer") is the contract purchaser of that parcel of real property commonly known as 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street, Des Plaines, Illinois ("Development Parcels”) which is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street; and WHEREAS, the Development Parcels is currently improved with a manufacturing building and associated surface parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to develop a residential planned development consisting of 50 townhouses ("Proposed Development") on the Development Parcels; and WHEREAS, the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance of 1998, as amended, is codified as Title 12 of the City Code of the City of Des Plaines ("Zoning Ordinance''); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 12-3-5 and 12-3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Developer ("Petitioner") filed an application with the City for the approval of: (i) a map amendment ("Proposed Map Amendment”) to the "Zoning Map of the City of Des Plaines" ("Zoning Map") to classify the Development Parcels to the R-3 Townhouse Residential District; (ii) a Tentative Plat of Subdivision (“Tentative Plat of Subdivision”); and (iii) a preliminary planned unit development plat for the Development Parcel (“Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD”), including certain proposed exceptions within the proposed planned unit development (“Proposed PUD Exceptions”) (collectively, (i) through (iii) are the “Requested Relief”); and WHEREAS, the petitioner’s application for the Requested Relief was referred by the Department of Community and Economic Development to the Planning and Zoning Board (“PZB”) within 15 days after receipt of the application; and WHEREAS, within ninety (90) days after the date of the Petitioners' application, a public hearing was held by the Board on October 24, 2023, pursuant to publication in the Des Plaines Journal on October 4, 2023; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Development Parcels; and WHEREAS, during the public hearing the PZB heard testimony and received evidence with respect to how the Petitioner intended to satisfy and comply with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and Page 130 of 158 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13-2-2 of the Subdivision Regulations, the Board approved, by a vote of 6-0, to approve the Tentative Plat of Subdivision; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 12-3-5 and 12-3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Board filed a written report with the City Council on August 9, 2023, summarizing the testimony and evidence received by the Board and stating its recommendation, by a vote of 6-0, to recommend approval of the remainder of the Requested Relief, subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the Petitioners made representations to the Board with respect to the Requested Relief, which representations are hereby found by the City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies in approving the Revised Relief; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the written report of the Board, the applicable standards for map amendments set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, and the Community and Economic Development Staff Memorandum dated October 25, 2023, and has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and the public to approve the Requested Relief in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for the approval of the Proposed Map Amendment, the Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD, and the Proposed PUD Exceptions. SECTION 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARCELS. The Development Parcels are legally described as: THAT PART OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 (ALL INCLUSIVE) IN BLOCK 9 IN DES PLAINES MANOR TRACT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN SECTIONS 17 AND 20 IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF RECORDED JULY 14, 1911, TOGETHER WITH THAT PART OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 6 IN BLOCK 6 IN PARSON AND LEE’S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF DES PLAINES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 72 TO 74 (BOTH INCLUSIVE) AND 174 TO 177, (BOTH INCLUSIVE) IN THE TOWN OF DES PLAINES, PART OF THE SECTIONS 17 AND 20, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DESCRIBED AT THE NORTHEASTERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 IN BLOCK 6 IN PARSON AND LEE’S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF DES PLAINES; SAID POINT ALSO KNOWN AS THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF GRACELAND Page 131 of 158 AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THACKER STREET (ALSO KNOWN AS DEMPSTER AVENUE); THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 48 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF AFORESAID GRACELAND AVENUE (ALSO KNOWN AS THE EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 6 AFORESAID, A DISTANCE OF 517.56 FEET TO A POINT; SAID BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL AND SAUTE STE. MARIE RAILROAD (FORMERLY THE WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD); THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 735.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF AFORESAID THACKER STREET; THENCE NORTH 87 THACKER STREET, A DISTANCE OF 6.96 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE AFORESAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THACKER STREET (ALSO KNOWN AS THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 9), A DISTANCE OF 519.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PINS: 09-20-105-016, 09-20-105-017, 09-20-105-020, 09-20-105-021, 09-20-105-022, 09-20-105-023, 09-20-105-024, 09-20-105-045, 09-20-203-006 Commonly known as 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street SECTION 3. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT. Pursuant to Section 12- 3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council has considered the factors relevant to the approval of map amendments and has determined that the procedure for the review of map amendments has been satisfied. The Map Amendment to rezone the Development Parcels from the M-2 District to the R-3 District is hereby approved. SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PUD. Pursuant to Section 12-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council hereby approves the Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD for the Development Parcels, which consists of the following plans: A. “Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat,” consisting of two sheets, prepared by Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd., and with a latest revision date of May 30, 2023; B. “Graceland and Thacker Architectural Plans,” consisting of eleven sheets, prepared by Fitzgerald, and with a latest revision date of October 2, 2023; and C. “Landscape Plan Site A,” consisting of four sheets, prepared by Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd., and with a latest revision date of May 8, 2023; and Page 132 of 158 D. “Site A R3 Photometric Plan,” consisting of thirty-two sheets, prepared by Paramount EO Electrical Supplies and Services, and with a latest revision date of October 2, 2023; and E. “Graceland & Thacker Residential Community Engineering Plans,” consisting of four sheets, prepared by Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd., and with a latest revision date of May 30, 2023 (collectively, the "Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD"), copies of which are attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance as Exhibit A. The City Council hereby directs the Zoning Administrator to accept the Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD for the Subject Property, subject to and contingent upon the conditions set forth in Section 9 of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUEST FOR PUD EXCEPTIONS. The City Council hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Section 12-3-5.C of the Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner has requested, and the Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD contemplates, two exceptions to the bulk regulations of the R-3 Townhouse District: (1) to permit a minimum lot area of 2,608 square feet per dwelling unit, where a minimum of 2,800 square feet per dwelling unit is required, as set forth in Section 12-7-3.F of the Zoning Ordinance and (2) to permit a front yard setback of 12 feet where a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet is required. At the time of consideration of a proposed final plat of planned unit development ("Final Plat of PUD") for the Subject Property, a final plat of subdivision for the Subject Property, and a final development plan for the Subject Property, the City Council will consider approval the Proposed PUD Exceptions. SECTION 6. SUBMISSION OF FINAL PLAT OF PUD AND FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION. Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 12-3-5.D.3 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 13-2-4 of the Subdivision Code, the adoption of this Ordinance authorizes the Petitioner to submit a Final Plat of PUD and a final plat of subdivision for the Subject Property to the City. Page 133 of 158 SECTION 7. EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PUD. Pursuant to Section 12-3-5.D.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the approval of the Proposed Preliminary Plat of PUD for the Subject Property, as provided in Section 5 of this Ordinance, will not be deemed or interpreted as authorizing or entitling the development or the improvement of the Subject Property in any manner whatsoever unless and until the City Council approves, by ordinance or resolution duly adopted, as the case may be: (i) a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Subject Property, pursuant to Section 12-3-5.D.5 of the Zoning Ordinance; and (ii) a final plat of subdivision for the Subject Property, pursuant to Section 13-2-8 of the Subdivision Regulations. Nothing herein will be deemed or interpreted as obligating or requiring the City Council to approve a conditional use permit for a planned unit development or a final plat of subdivision. Further, the City Council has no obligation to consider or approve a conditional use permit for a planned unit development or a final plat of subdivision unless and until: A. The Petitioner complies with the applicable procedures for the review and approval of a Final Plat of PUD for the Subject Property, as set forth in Section 12-3-5.D.5 of the Zoning Ordinance; and B. The Petitioner complies with the applicable procedures for review and approval of a final plat of subdivision for the Subject Property, as set forth in Chapter 2 of the Subdivision Regulations. SECTION 8. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The approvals granted in Sections 3, 4, and 5 of this Ordinance are expressly subject to and contingent upon compliance by the Petitioner with each and all of the following conditions, all at the sole cost and expense of the Petitioner: 1. In the event the property is sold, and/or a property owner desires to sell separate, fee-simple townhouse units, a Plat of Subdivision will be necessary to create separate lots and a Homeowner’s Association, or similar unified control entity must be established along with any covenants, conditions, and restrictions governing maintenance of common areas. Page 134 of 158 2. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD plat, all public improvements must be noted on plans and all engineering comments addressed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Engineering. 3. At time of submission for final subdivision and PUD Plat, the landscape plan must be revised in the park area closest to Thacker Street between Laurel Avenue and the railroad track. Bushes and a semi-open fence (wrought iron or chain link) should be placed around the north corner of the proposed park to allow visibility for traffic from Thacker Street. 4. At time of final subdivision and PUD Plat, the photometric plan must be revised to include lighting at the entrances of both driveways. Any new lighting must be in conformance with Section 12-12-10 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Each townhouse unit shall have separate water and sanitary sewer services. 6. All electrical lines on the property must be installed underground. 7. The Petitioner shall enter into a Subdivision and Development Agreement memorializing its obligations to develop the Development Parcels in full compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, building codes and regulations, and the conditions set forth in this Ordinance as well as any other entitlements granted by the City. SECTION 9. TIME PERIOD FOR SUBMISSION OF FINAL PLAT OF PUD AND FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION. Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 12-3-5.D.3 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 13-2-10.B of the Subdivision Regulations, respectively, the Petitioner must submit for review by the City: (a) a Final Plat of PUD for the Subject Property no later than the date that is 12 months after the effective date of this Ordinance; and (b) a final plat of subdivision for the Subject Property no later than the date that is 12 months after the effective date of the approval of the Tentative Plat of Subdivision by the PZB. SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication in pamphlet form in the manner required by law. Page 135 of 158 SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY. If any paragraph, section, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect without affecting the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. PASSED this day of , 2023. APPROVED this day of 2023. VOTE: AYES NAYS _____ABSENT MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form: day of , 2023. CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 136 of 158 LEGENDPRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLATSITE DETAILSLOT AREA SUMMARYLEGAL DESCRIPTIONGENERAL NOTESExhibit APage 137 of 158 R-1 SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIALM-1 LIMITE D MANUFACT U R I N G M-1 LIMITE D MANUFACT U R I N G C-1 NEIGH B O R H O O D SHOPPING C-3 GENERALCOMMERCIALR-4 CENTRAL CORERESIDENTIALR-1 SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIALR-4 CENTRAL CORERESIDENTIALC-5 CENTRAL BUSINESSDISTRICTPRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLATExhibit APage 138 of 158 Luz and Associates #1 LLC Owner/Developer: Issued for PZB Hearing Application | October 02, 2023 Des Plaines, Illinois Graceland and Thacker Architect: TH A C K E R S T . TH A C K E R S T .LEE ST.LEE ST.GRACELAND AVE.GRACELAND AVE.OAKWOO D AVE.OAKWOO D AVE. PROJECT SITE Exhibit A Page 139 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 2 Zoning Map & Location Map ZONING MAP LOCATION MAP !6!8 !7 !11 !15 ^^ ^ ^^ Shagbark LakeDesPlainesRiver Farm e r 's C reeCARO L L N SHAGBARKDRJOSEPH SC H W A B R D /CAMPG R O U N D RD RIVER DRY LNOAKWOODAVEPRAIRIEA STEWART A V E DES PLA INES R IV FOREST AVEWHITE STVAN BUREN AVE CENTER STCORA STDEANE STLEE STJEANNETTE STOLIVIA AVE VAN BUREN AVE SECOND AVEWEBSTER LNWEBSTER LNSECOND AVEWALNUT AVE JEANNETTE STMARGRET STALGONQUIN RD LEE STCAMPBELL AVE HENRY AVE WALNUT AVE OAKWOOD AVE ALGONQUIN RD ALGONQUIN RD PARKVIEW LNBU S S E H W Y MASON LNTHACKER ST WHITE STASHLAND AVE CENTER STOAKWOOD AVE ALTER AVE ROSE AV E FIRST AVELAUREL AVEGRACELAND AVEMA R I O N S T TH A C K E R S T LEE STCENTER STPEARSON STMI N E R S T RD GARLAND PLMINER ST CIRCULARA V E WESLEYDRP E O N Y L N FLORALNCLARKAVEMOTTIERDR KINGSLEYAVT RIVER DR LINWO O D S T MEMILL ST CORA STWHITCOMB AVE PRAIRIEAV E National Railroad Un i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r CanadianCHEROKEE PARK CENTRAL PARK WINNEBAGO PARK POTOWATOMIE PARK PAROUBECK PARK RAND PARK MYSTIC WATERS Village of Mount Prospect Unincorporated Cook County Unincorporated Cook County DesPl ai ne s Ri v e r 200 N 700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 N 900 N 1000 N 1100 N 1200 N 1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 0 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1400 E700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E900 N 1000 N 1100 N 1200 N 1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1300 E 1500 EMIDDLETONCTC A S T L E RE A L N D U RSEY LN KYLEMORE CTCALLENLNMIDDLETONLN WATERFORDDR KE N M A R E D RLISMOREDR WOLFRDL O N GFOR DDRWEXFORDCTCT MADELYN DR WIS CONSINDR MADELYN DRMEADOWDCARLOW DRKENMAR E CT BENDING CENTRAL RD BERKSHIRE CT C IR C LE DRR )RA N D R D RA N D R D MARK AVE THERESE TER TIMOTHY LNYORKSHIRE LN REGENCY DRBERKSHIRE LNNELSON LNKYLEMORE DR RDDWA I K I K I D R THIRD AVEWOLF RDCORNELL AVEPRINCETON ST CAMBRIDGE RDSTONE STAM HERSTAVE CRANBROOK DRRADCLIFFE AVEVASSAR LNAMHERST AVEPINEHURST DRHARVARD ST SI M O N E D R ST R A T F O R D R D SEVENTH AVESIXTH AVEPOLYNESIAN DR LUAU DR FIFTH AVEFOURTH AVECONCORD LNTHIRD AVCONCORD CTPATRICIA LNMARCELLARDRA N D R D TIMOTHYLN WATE R F O R D CTWOLF RDWOLF RDCENTRAL RD CENTRAL RD CENTRAL RDCENTRAL RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDALBANY LNCLAYTON LNTRACY TER JON LNDESPLAINESRI VERRDGREGORY ST HALPINDRO 'C ONNORDR QUIGLEYDR MARYVILLEWAYMULCAHEYDRCLANCYDRBERKSHIRELN NAZARE T H W A Y COLLINS DR DORAN DRMEADOW CT PROVIDENCE DR TIMOTHY LNBERKSHIRE LN DRAKE LN Canadian National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)CRAIG MANOR PARK KYLEMORE GREENS CHEY E N N E PARK DIMUCCI-LOWENBERG PARK SIOUX PARK HAWAII PARK CHIPPEWA E Date of last map update: April 11, 2022 Check out www.desplaines.org/explore-our-city/city-map-gallery to view the most up to date zoning information with the interactive city map. Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Size 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU 10,000 Sq. Ft (Minimum) 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU (Interior)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Corner) 6,875 Sq. Ft. (Interior)8,125 Sq. Ft. (Corner) Commercial Neighborhood ShoppingC-1 Limited Office CommercialC-2 General CommercialC-3 Regional ShoppingC-4 Central BusinessC-5 Casino DistrictC-6 C-7 High Density Campus Commercial Institutional InstitutionalI-1 Other Planned Unit Development^ Manufacturing Special ManufacturingM-3 General ManufacturingM-2 Limited ManufacturingM-1 Single Family Residential Single Family ResidentialR-1 Multi Family Residential R-3 Mobile HomeM-H Townhouse Residential Central Core ResidentialR-4 Two Family ResidentialR-2 Village of Mount Prospect Unincorporated Cook County Des700 N 600 N 800 N 900 N 1000 N 1100 N 1200 N 1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1400 E900 N 1000 N 1100 N 1200 N 1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1300 E 1500 EMIDDLETON CTC A S T L E RE A L N D U RSEY LN KYL EMORE CTCALLENLNMIDDLETONLN WATERFORDDR KE N M A R E D RLISMOREDR WOLFRDL O N GFOR DDRWEXFORDCTCT MADELYN DR MADELYN DRCARLOW DRKENMAR E CT BENDING CENTRAL RD BERKSHIRE CT MARK AVE THERESE TER TIMOTHY LNYORKSHIRE LN REGENCY DRBERKSHIRE LNNELSON LNKYLEMORE DR PATRICIA LNMARCELLARDRD TIMOTHYLN WATE R F O R D CTWOLF RDWOLF RDCENTRAL RD CENTRAL RD CENTRAL RDCENTRAL RD ALBANY LNCLAYTON LNNDESPLAI NESRIVERRDGREGORY ST HALPINDRO 'C ONNORDR QUIGLEYDR MARYVILLEWAYMULCAHEYDRCLANCYDRBERKSHIRELN COLLINS DR DORAN DRPROVIDENCE DR TIMOTHY LNBERKSHIRE LN Canadian CRAIG MANOR PARK KYLEMORE GREENS Date of last map update: April 11, 2022 Check out www.desplaines.org/explore-our-city/city-map-gallery to view the most up to date zoning information with the interactive city map. Zoning District Legend Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Size 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU 10,000 Sq. Ft (Minimum) 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU (Interior)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Corner) 6,875 Sq. Ft. (Interior)8,125 Sq. Ft. (Corner) Commercial Neighborhood ShoppingC-1 Limited Office CommercialC-2 General CommercialC-3 Regional ShoppingC-4 Central BusinessC-5 Casino DistrictC-6 C-7 High Density Campus Commercial Institutional InstitutionalI-1 Other Planned Unit Development^ Manufacturing Special ManufacturingM-3 General ManufacturingM-2 Limited ManufacturingM-1 Single Family Residential Single Family ResidentialR-1 Multi Family Residential R-3 Mobile HomeM-H Townhouse Residential Central Core ResidentialR-4 Two Family ResidentialR-2 SITESITE M-2 M-1R-1 R-1 R-1 R-4 R-4 C-3 C-5 PROJECT SITE Exhibit A Page 140 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 3 Site Plan Exhibit A Page 141 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 4 Aerial View Existing 5-Story Buildings Existing 6-Story Building Existing 5-Story Building Existing 3-Story Buildings Existing 5-Story Buildings Existing 7-Story Building Proposed 3-Story Buildings Proposed 4-Story Building G r a c e l a n d A v e . G r a c e l a n d A v e . Thacker St.Thacker St. Oakwood A v e . Oakwood A v e . Exhibit A Page 142 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 5 Graceland Ave.Thacker St.Eye Level View along Graceland Exhibit A Page 143 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 6 Graceland Ave.Thacker St.Graceland Ave.Thacker St.Proposed Street Elevations FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACE BRICK FACE BRICK FACE BRICK FACE BRICK GRACELAND AVE. STREET ELEVATION THACKER ST. STREET ELEVATION 34’-0” TOP OF HIGHEST ROOF BEAMS 34’-0” TOP OF HIGHEST ROOF BEAMS Exhibit A Page 144 of 158 Des Plaines, Illinois | October 02, 2023 Graceland and Thacker Luz and Associates #1 LLC 7 Cast StoneFace Brick Face Brick12 3 4Face Brick 5 Fiber Cement Panel Fiber Cement Panel 6 FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION Building Elevations Graceland Ave.Thacker St.a b cd d c b a 1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6 66 6 5 5 5 5 4 44 4 3 33 3 Exhibit A Page 145 of 158 Contour PlaceDes Plaines, IL | September 01, 2023Exhibit APage 146 of 158 Contour PlaceDes Plaines, IL | September 01, 2023Exhibit APage 147 of 158 Contour PlaceDes Plaines, IL | September 01, 2023Exhibit APage 148 of 158 Contour PlaceDes Plaines, IL | September 01, 2023Exhibit APage 149 of 158 EVEVGRACELAND AVENUETHACKER STREETRAILROAD R I G H T O F W A Y Professional Design FirmLicense No. 184-003220Expires: 04/30/2025145 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE AGRAYSLAKE, ILLINOIS 60030phone (847) 223-4804fax (847) 223-4864email INFO@EEA-LTD.COMASSOCIATES, LTD.ENGINEERINGERIKSSONLANDSCAPE NOTES:® PLANT SCHEDULE SITE ASITE MATERIALS SCHEDULE (SITE A)Exhibit APage 150 of 158 Exhibit APage 151 of 158 Exhibit APage 152 of 158 Professional Design FirmLicense No. 184-003220Expires: 04/30/2025145 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE AGRAYSLAKE, ILLINOIS 60030phone (847) 223-4804fax (847) 223-4864email INFO@EEA-LTD.COMASSOCIATES, LTD.ENGINEERINGERIKSSONTREE PLANTING DETAIL1EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL2SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL3ANNUAL, PERENNIAL, & GROUNDCOVER DETAIL4DU MOR, INC.MIFFLINTOWN, PA 17059-014215 INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE, P.O. BOX 1421-800-598-4018PHONE:(717) 436-2106FAX:(717) 436-9839www.dumor.com6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND PURCHASING INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info REFERENCE NUMBER 017-300.5. BENCH IS SHIPPED UNASSEMBLED.6' LENGTHSELECT DESIRED LENGTH8' LENGTH1 1/16"71 1/2" ( 93-60 )94 9/16" ( 93-80 )72 3/4" 93-60 )95 13/16" ( 93-80 )28 1/8"33 1/4"19 3/4"16 1/16"2 3/8" Ø STL. PIPE(TOP & BOTTOM)1/4" X 1 1/2" STL. BAR(27 REQ'D FOR 6')(36 REQ'D FOR 8')3/8" ØSTL. BARDuMor INC.CAST LEG9/16" ØHOLE1/2" X 2 1/2"S.STL FLAT SKT.HD. CAP SCR.ISOMETRIC VIEWFRONT VIEWSIDE VIEW3. ALL STL. MEMBERS COATED W/ ZINC RICH EPOXY THEN FINISHED W/ POLYESTER POWDER COATING.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.NOTES:4. 1/2" X 3 3/4" EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS PROVIDED.NOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALE6' STEEL BENCH7. 6' BENCH WITH ARMS AND NO CENTER ARMREST.8. OR APPROVED EQUAL. APPROVED EQUAL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER IN WRITING PRIOR TO SUBSTITUTION.5Exhibit APage 153 of 158 6FDOH'UDZQ%\ 'DWH &RPPHQWV5HYLVLRQV&KHFNHG%\'DWH3DJHRI6,7($5NOTES:1. Calculation Results taken At Grade2. Pole Height: 20'3. Calculation Point Spacing: 5' x 5'F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F1F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2F2S1S1S1S1S1S1S1S2S1S1S1S1S1F2F2S1S2S2S2F2F2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S2S20.50.6 0.7 0.7 0.60.50.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.80.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.90.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.11.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.31.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.51.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.81.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.51.4 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.11.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.81.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.32.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.32.2 1.9 1.8 1.3 1.33.5 3.3 2.6 2.5 3.03.0 2.7 1.9 1.4 1.34.7 4.7 3.0 2.7 4.34.2 3.9 2.2 1.5 1.56.1 6.3 3.5 3.2 5.73.1 5.4 5.6 2.7 1.7 1.77.8 6.7 3.5 3.3 6.0 8.04.1 7.3 6.3 2.7 1.8 1.84.6 8.6 6.6 3.6 3.5 6.0 8.6 5.24.6 8.5 6.2 2.8 1.9 1.80.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.9 4.3 7.4 6.9 3.8 3.6 6.5 7.9 4.7 3.1 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 2.1 3.0 4.2 7.6 6.6 3.0 2.1 2.00.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.3 3.7 6.0 6.4 4.0 3.9 6.2 6.4 4.3 2.7 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.7 6.1 6.2 3.2 2.2 2.30.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.9 4.0 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.1 3.0 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.9 3.1 5.1 5.0 3.8 3.8 5.3 5.9 4.2 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.1 3.3 5.0 4.7 2.9 2.2 2.30.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.6 3.8 5.1 6.8 7.8 7.8 6.8 5.1 3.9 2.8 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.6 4.1 4.0 3.7 3.9 4.5 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.3 4.2 3.0 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.2 3.0 4.3 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.7 4.7 3.3 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.9 4.0 3.5 2.6 2.0 2.00.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.8 3.6 4.4 5.0 5.1 4.4 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.6 3.4 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.2 5.0 5.5 5.9 7.3 8.2 8.0 6.9 5.2 4.0 2.9 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.9 3.9 5.1 6.7 8.0 8.3 7.0 5.3 4.1 2.8 2.0 1.8 2.0 2.6 3.2 2.7 2.5 1.9 1.95.1 4.5 3.7 3.1 2.6 2.2 2.11.6 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.12.8 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.81.7 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.02.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.71.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.71.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.51.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.51.6 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.01.6 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.81.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.71.5 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.81.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.61.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.71.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.11.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.71.2 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.6 1.91.4 1.2 1.2 1.5 2.01.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.21.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.01.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.51.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.81.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.21.3 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.71.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.71.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.02.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.31.6 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.02.1 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.61.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.92.1 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.4 0.91.4 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.12.6 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.71.6 1.9 2.4 2.9 2.73.3 3.3 2.5 1.9 1.9 2.41.8 2.1 3.1 4.1 3.34.2 4.7 3.3 2.0 2.0 2.41.7 2.2 4.3 5.2 3.84.9 6.1 4.1 2.1 1.8 1.91.6 2.3 5.3 6.8 4.35.3 7.6 4.4 2.2 1.9 1.81.5 2.2 5.1 7.8 4.85.7 7.7 4.1 2.3 2.1 2.31.4 2.2 5.0 7.8 4.85.1 7.6 4.3 2.3 2.2 2.61.4 2.2 5.3 6.8 4.14.5 6.3 4.1 2.1 1.9 2.11.4 2.0 4.3 5.1 3.53.4 4.6 3.3 1.8 1.6 1.61.5 1.9 3.1 4.1 3.02.6 3.1 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.81.6 1.9 2.4 3.0 2.72.0 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.31.6 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.31.4 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.81.4 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.91.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.11.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.71.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.91.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.91.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.71.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.51.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.61.1 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.81.0 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.50.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.30.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.41.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.71.10.8 0.8 1.0 1.51.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.41.2 1.0 1.01.21.61.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.81.5 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.71.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.51.9 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.72.1 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.92.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.72.5 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.53.2 2.9 2.3 1.7 1.64.2 4.2 2.8 1.8 1.85.2 5.9 3.5 2.0 1.96.1 7.3 3.8 2.1 1.86.7 7.7 3.6 2.1 1.96.5 7.4 3.6 2.2 2.25.5 6.8 3.8 2.4 2.54.4 5.3 3.6 2.6 2.83.9 4.3 3.6 3.4 3.63.9 4.5 5.0 5.2 5.7 5.93.5 4.3 5.6 6.7 8.1 8.4 8.3 7.3 5.5 4.0 2.8 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.93.9 4.4 5.2 5.5 5.2 5.2 5.3 4.5 3.3 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.13.7 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.35.3 6.0 5.6 5.5 5.7 4.7 3.5 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.28.1 8.2 7.3 5.5 4.1 2.8 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.10.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.10.00.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.10.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.10.0 0.00.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.10.0 0.00.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.8 11.8 4.1 0.1 0.1 5.8 10.8 0.40.00.7 7.1 1.4 0.1 0.9 7.0 1.2 0.1 1.8 13.1 2.0 0.1 0.2 9.3 7.4 0.10.0 0.00.6 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.8 12.9 2.5 0.1 0.3 9.8 6.8 0.10.01.5 6.3 0.5 0.1 1.5 6.2 0.5 0.1 1.4 6.2 0.5 0.1 1.6 6.0 0.5 0.1 3.3 12.2 0.9 0.1 0.7 11.7 4.1 0.10.0 0.00.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.40.7 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.8 1.01.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.6 1.4 1.9 1.4 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.7 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.41.1 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.30.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.90.8 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.0 0.51.3 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.5 2.10.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.61.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.2 0.61.7 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.90.9 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.61.3 2.6 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.9 2.9 1.5 0.72.3 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.413.9 4.3 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.91.7 3.4 4.6 3.5 2.5 3.1 4.3 3.9 2.0 1.03.0 3.9 2.8 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.60.4 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.42.3 4.4 6.1 4.5 2.9 3.9 6.2 5.1 2.7 1.53.9 5.3 3.8 1.9 1.6 1.8 2.30.1 0.10.00.10.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.53.2 5.3 7.8 5.0 3.1 4.27.56.3 3.5 2.44.9 7.2 4.4 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.60.1 0.10.00.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.9 2.5 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.7 2.9 3.7 5.9 8.1 4.8 3.3 4.2 8.0 7.0 4.1 3.0 2.1 2.3 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.0 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.2 3.7 5.4 7.8 4.2 2.2 1.8 1.8 2.011.8 3.6 0.10.00.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.7 3.5 5.6 8.2 5.1 3.4 4.5 8.0 6.8 4.0 2.9 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.7 3.5 5.6 7.9 4.4 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.56.1 1.9 0.10.00.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 5.2 7.2 5.2 3.6 4.8 7.4 6.0 3.6 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 2.2 3.0 5.1 7.3 4.8 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.40.1 0.1 0.10.00.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.7 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 2.9 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.6 4.4 5.8 4.7 3.5 4.6 6.2 5.2 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.8 4.4 5.7 4.2 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.90.4 0.1 0.10.00.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.9 4.3 6.1 7.1 7.4 7.1 6.1 4.4 3.1 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 2.2 3.7 4.5 4.0 3.6 4.2 5.3 5.2 4.4 4.3 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.7 2.9 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.2 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.3 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.5 3.8 4.4 3.3 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.312.1 1.2 0.10.00.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.9 5.1 6.1 6.6 6.1 5.1 4.0 3.2 2.6 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 2.0 3.2 3.6 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.5 5.4 5.8 6.8 7.8 7.8 7.6 6.2 4.5 3.1 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 3.1 4.5 6.0 7.6 7.9 7.8 6.6 4.9 3.3 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.3 3.2 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.96.4 0.6 0.10.00.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.6 0.6 3.7 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.9 4.3 4.7 4.8 5.4 6.0 6.3 6.0 5.2 4.1 3.3 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.9 4.8 5.6 6.1 5.7 5.0 3.8 2.9 2.2 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.30.1 0.10.0 0.00.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.6 0.9 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.7 3.1 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.5 3.9 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.4 2.70.4 0.1 0.10.00.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.7 1.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.7 3.8 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.1 3.0 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9 2.1 2.5 0.9 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.6 3.7 5.2 6.1 5.9 6.0 5.9 4.5 3.1 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.00.01.0 0.10.00.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.6 4.9 6.6 7.6 7.6 6.8 5.1 3.9 2.7 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.71.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.9 4.1 5.3 6.8 8.1 7.7 6.2 4.7 3.5 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.01.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.66.3 0.6 0.10.00.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.6 3.3 4.1 4.7 4.8 4.1 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.22.0 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.9 4.5 4.3 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.02.4 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.00.1 0.1 0.10.00.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.1 2.7 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.62.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 2.7 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 3.02.2 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.50.5 0.1 0.10.00.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 4.11.8 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.9 12.61.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.9 1.912.5 1.1 0.10.00.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 8.11.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.90.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.51.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.75.6 0.5 0.10.00.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.81.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.60.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.12.1 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.30.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.32.2 1.6 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.20.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.42.1 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.4 2.60.5 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.20.00.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.82.2 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.82.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 10.11.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 1.812.1 0.9 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 2.3 7.1 1.0 9.01.7 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.36.0 0.5 3.2 6.7 0.7 0.2 0.3 5.71.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.80.5 0.10.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.10.10.10.47.825.11.82.51.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.50.4 0.5 10.5 24.4 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.21.9 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.20.1 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.12.3 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.6 2.10.2 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.22.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.60.1 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.22.6 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.6 2.00.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.81.8 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.11.5 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.8 9.02.0 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.412.4 6.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 5.1 12.01.4 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 1.9 1.63.8 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 2.1 10.01.7 2.1 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.42.9 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.41.7 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.3 2.8 2.2 1.90.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 2.0 7.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.32.2 2.6 3.2 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.20.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 2.2 18.3 2.3 0.3 0.12.4 1.9 1.8 2.4 3.3 3.6 2.7 2.70.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 6.9 24.7 1.8 0.2 0.23.1 3.3 4.3 3.7 2.4 1.9 2.2 2.60.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 2.5 23.4 2.9 0.3 0.52.3 1.9 1.8 2.8 4.7 4.5 3.2 2.70.5 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.8 1.5 0.5 0.3 0.63.0 3.7 5.3 5.2 2.7 1.9 1.9 2.09.2 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 5.7 13.11.6 1.5 1.8 3.3 6.3 5.6 3.4 2.514.2 4.4 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 4.6 15.02.8 4.0 6.5 6.3 2.9 1.9 1.8 1.79.9 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.5 3.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.8 4.8 1.6 1.3 1.7 3.2 7.0 6.6 3.7 2.6 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 3.3 4.4 1.0 0.20.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.5 11.1 24.6 3.1 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.1 1.8 1.2 1.5 3.0 4.3 7.9 6.3 2.8 2.0 2.0 2.10.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 7.1 11.4 2.6 1.3 1.7 3.1 7.2 7.1 3.7 2.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 2.0 0.6 0.3 3.0 0.4 4.7 0.20.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.3 2.8 6.6 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.5 2.8 4.2 7.7 6.2 2.8 2.1 2.4 2.70.1 0.2 0.5 6.1 16.7 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 16.8 19.2 0.8 0.2 0.3 1.2 3.5 1.2 1.2 1.7 3.2 6.9 6.3 3.4 2.2 1.0 0.6 0.6 4.0 10.2 3.7 0.4 0.8 4.0 1.0 0.20.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.2 2.0 3.4 6.2 6.2 2.9 2.0 2.1 2.42.9 0.5 0.5 6.1 15.3 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 4.7 4.8 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.6 3.1 5.9 5.1 2.9 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.5 1.7 7.8 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.6 4.7 4.8 2.6 1.7 1.7 1.714.7 1.8 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.11.4 1.4 1.6 2.6 4.3 4.1 2.5 1.70.1 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.9 3.6 3.3 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.71.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.12.1 1.7 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.3 2.4 2.30.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.5 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.9 2.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.22.3 1.8 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.7 2.4 2.50.1 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 9.4 2.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.2 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.8 2.20.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.7 0.5 0.2 3.61.7 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.92.2 0.10.00.00.1 0.2 2.7 24.2 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.212.6 1.5 0.1 0.3 3.7 12.5 3.5 0.3 4.41.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.50.03.0 0.10.00.00.1 0.3 1.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.4 1.0 1.8 1.8 1.0 0.4 0.2 6.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 1.5 8.2 1.2 0.2 0.21.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.90.00.1 0.10.00.00.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.10.80.6 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.12.2 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.60.00.1 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.4 1.6 9.8 2.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.21.9 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.30.00.7 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.4 4.0 22.0 4.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.6 3.1 0.5 0.1 0.2 6.61.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.813.9 4.2 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 11.8 25.7 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.71.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.51.8 0.5 0.10.00.00.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.8 3.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.12.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.1 2.40.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.71.9 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 2.0 2.23.1 0.2 0.10.00.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 12.71.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.613.5 1.0 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.4 1.2 0.6 0.2 1.31.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.71.4 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.3 9.3 1.6 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 2.5 23.9 4.2 0.3 0.12.0 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.2 2.0 2.40.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.2 3.5 22.6 3.4 0.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 1.3 11.4 2.1 0.3 2.31.9 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 2.0 2.22.5 0.2 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.7 12.91.6 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.613.8 1.0 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.61.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.81.7 0.1 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.4 5.5 8.8 0.5 0.10.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.12.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.30.1 0.1 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.5 11.3 18.1 0.7 0.10.00.1 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 2.62.2 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.12.5 0.2 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 9.9 17.1 0.8 0.2 0.7 12.61.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.613.8 1.0 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 5.5 9.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 1.41.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.61.8 0.2 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.12.4 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.30.2 0.1 0.10.00.00.00.1 0.4 6.9 14.9 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.20.22.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.02.9 0.3 0.10.00.00.1 0.4 7.3 13.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 4.6 0.12.0 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.514.2 1.0 0.10.00.00.1 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.4 8.2 1.3 0.3 2.71.9 2.5 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.60.10.0 0.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 4.5 16.1 2.9 0.3 0.22.6 3.2 4.0 3.2 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.30.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.5 1.6 0.6 0.2 0.23.4 4.0 5.3 4.4 2.3 1.8 2.1 2.50.2 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 2.23.4 4.5 6.7 5.7 2.6 1.9 1.9 1.93.1 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.6 7.7 10.8 12.23.4 4.8 7.9 5.6 2.6 1.9 1.9 1.71.4 0.10.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.9 17.2 12.8 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.5 3.1 4.8 8.1 5.5 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.10.1 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.3 2.3 4.0 6.9 5.8 2.7 2.2 2.6 2.70.1 0.10.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.8 3.3 5.3 5.0 2.8 2.5 2.9 2.11.1 0.10.00.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.6 2.9 4.6 4.1 3.1 3.0 3.6 1.30.7 0.5 0.5 13.3 3.7 0.5 0.40.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.8 3.0 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.5 5.0 5.3 4.3 3.5 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.60.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.3 16.1 7.9 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.1 3.0 4.1 5.0 6.1 6.8 8.3 8.8 7.7 5.8 4.6 3.3 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.80.1 0.2 0.4 1.3 15.0 7.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.9 3.7 4.3 5.4 6.6 6.7 6.4 6.6 6.0 4.4 3.1 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.00.2 0.4 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.2 3.0 3.6 3.8 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.10.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.8 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.3 3.5 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.10.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.1 4.1 5.5 7.0 7.9 8.0 7.7 6.7 4.9 3.3 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.00.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.7 4.6 5.7 6.5 6.8 6.3 5.3 4.0 3.1 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.80.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.4 2.7 2.0 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.60.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.2 0.2 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.30.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.00.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.20.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.2 0.30.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.2 0.30.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.5 0.30.0 0.0 0.1 0.00.6 0.30.0 0.1 0.2 0.00.6 0.30.1 0.1 0.30.4 0.20.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.02.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.82.3 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.92.4 3.4 4.9 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.5 5.3 3.6 2.5 1.9 1.7 1.62.6 3.6 4.8 6.2 7.6 8.1 6.4 4.9 3.8 2.7 1.9 1.61.50.9 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.3 4.0 4.7 4.4 3.7 3.0 2.4 1.91.50.80.50.30.30.30.77.15.00.40.10.20.917.59.20.50.2 0.6 3.35.40.60.30.45.47.40.60.20.22.30.40.10.10.20.614.620.17.02.01.22.92.70.40.30.40.40.62.00.70.60.81.42.02.22.22.1 2.63.1 3.23.3 3.43.4 3.43.3 3.54.04.66.35.44.84.64.13.83.73.43.22.82.22.02.22.22.12.32.93.74.85.65.75.34.43.42.51.91.51.42.12.01.91.82.12.63.54.45.05.14.53.83.02.31.71.31.10.60.40.50.64.82.30.50.40.30.20.20.20.30.20.25.35.20.20.20.64.43.80.40.10.10.10.45.50.20.10.20.20.610.19.01.50.7 0.3 3.32.00.20.30.50.20.40.30.10.10.20.65.3 2.10.30.2 0.813.419.3 1.51.79.02.60.40.20.712.713.00.70.20.10.10.74.61.10.20.10.44.11.40.32.64.50.34.017.914.40.60.20.30.10.2 2.71.90.10.20.97.12.20.20.10.20.24.90.20.20.20.79.15.90.40.10.10.30.60.20.48.10.80.20.75.40.90.20.20.3 0.3 0.22.20.30.51.93.919.82.61.30.30.31.25.111.91.00.20.20.94.32.20.30.10.34.813.00.90.10.10.21.95.50.80.20.21.617.83.10.30.31.90.60.20.24.40.20.20.92.70.30.10.20.30.20.30.30.41.43.919.91.60.20.20.20.22.10.2 0.20.21.06.51.40.20.10.10.90.80.10.10.20.715.714.65.10.60.30.60.80.20.20.20.20.50.91.11.31.72.33.13.84.33.83.12.41.91.63.93.52.9 2.3 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.81.8 1.81.71.61.63.0 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.02.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.3 3.1 4.2 4.9 4.5 4.7 4.8 3.8 2.7 2.31.61.7 1.7 2.0 2.8 4.1 5.2 7.1 7.7 7.5 6.4 4.7 3.4 2.5Luminaire ScheduleSymbolDescriptionTagCalculation SummaryLabelVSR-S-T2-32L-7-30K-UNVS1UnitsAvgMaxMinDescriptionEntire Site 1Fc1.6125.70.0GreyPARKING SPACES CENTERFc3.308.11.5PINKPARKING SPACES WESTFc2.937.71.6BLUEHP2-5CCT-WHF1AT68010-BNF2EB48538-BKS2PROPERTY LINESFc0.030.60.0REDSIDEWALK CENTERFc2.2419.90.1GreenSIDEWALK WESTFc2.9020.10.1ORANGEStreetsFc2.498.60.5PurpleExhibit APage 154 of 158 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDGEOMETRY NOTESCITY OF DES PLAINESBENCHMARKSExhibit APage 155 of 158 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDUTILITY NOTESSTRUCTURE NOTESExhibit APage 156 of 158 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDPAVING & SURFACE LEGENDGRADING NOTESExhibit APage 157 of 158 legendfire truckingress from thacker - egress to gracelandfire truckingress from graceland - egress to thackerExhibit APage 158 of 158 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: November 21, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Samantha Redman, Senior Planner Cc: Ryan Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Zoning Map Amendment from C-3 to R-4 at Approximately 1217 Thacker Street/919-921 Graceland Avenue (Former Contour Saws Parking Lot) (Site B) Issue: The petitioner is requesting to rezone the property at PIN 09-20-203-006-0000 (approximately 1217 Thacker Street/919-921 Graceland Avenue) from C-3 General Commercial to R-3 Townhouse Residential. Petitioner: Luz and Associates #1, LLC, 2030 West Wabansia Ave., Chicago, IL 60611 Owner: Contour Saws, Inc., 100 Lakeview Parkway, Ste. 100, Vernon Hills, IL 60061 Case Number: #23-040-MAP PIN: 09-20-203-006-0000 Ward Number: #2, Alderman Colt Moylan Existing Zoning: C-3, General Commercial Surrounding Zoning: North: R-4, Central Core Residential South: Railroad and C-3, General Commercial East: C-3, General Commercial West: M-2, General Manufacturing Surrounding Land Uses: North: Multi-family residential building South: Railroad and commercial office buildings East: Commercial buildings West: Former Contour Saws manufacturing building Street Classification: Graceland Avenue is classified as a minor arterial road. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial is the recommended use for this property. MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 132 CONSENT AGENDA #13. Property/Zoning History: The property was formerly the parking lot associated with the Contour Saws manufacturing facility located to the northwest. The Contour Saws building was built in the 1960s and operated in this location until 2020. Historic aerials indicate the site has been developed as a parking lot since the early 1960s, and the use has never changed.1 Between 1938 and 1960, zoning for the property changed from commercial to light industrial and back to the current commercial zoning. However, no commercial use has ever been associated with this property. The property is currently owned by Contour Saws and is vacant. Project Description: The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the main Contour Saws building property on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing a zoning map amendment from C- 3, General Commercial to R-4, Central Core Residential. The amendment would allow for a contemplated multifamily residential building at this site, one of two that are proposed for the former Contour Saws facility. Zoning Map Amendment Overview The purpose of a zoning map amendment is to determine whether an existing zoning district is suitable for a location and, if not, which zoning district would be more suitable, given the context of the neighborhood, city goals, and local, state, and national development trends. Although a specific project can be considered alongside any zoning application, zoning change deliberation often looks at a property at a larger scale within the neighborhood and city. However, a Site Plan Review, as required by Section 12-3-2, was performed for the conceptual project at this site. The Site Plan Review contributes to the overall assessment of a zoning map amendment, demonstrating the feasibility of a specific project with this zoning. Refer to the Site Plan Review section of this report and associated attachments. C-3 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-4 Zoning The C-3, General Commercial zoning district is intended to accommodate a diversity of businesses. Out of all of the commercial districts, C-3 permits the largest number of different uses, allowing for 37 uses permitted by right (meaning no zoning entitlement process) and 28 conditional uses. A broad variety of uses are allowed, including retail, office, restaurants, and other commercial services. However, this site has never been developed with a commercial use, despite having the most permissive commercial zoning for decades. Even with the closure of Contour Saws in 2020, the site remains an unoccupied, surface parking lot. The Comprehensive Plan envisions this area for manufacturing uses; however, the plan was written in 2019 prior to the unanticipated closure of Contour Saws in 2020. Considering this site has never successfully been developed into a commercial use, the zoning map amendment process allows the City to determine if another type of use would be more suitable. This site is uniquely situated near many amenities and services necessary to support residential development. Few available properties exist in Des Plaines with the transit, recreational, and 1 Historic Aerials, 1961 Aerial, historicaerials.com Page 2 of 132 commercial opportunities available within walking distance, making this site an ideal location for additional residential versus commercial or manufacturing development. Within a half-mile of the property (an approximate 8–15-minute walk for the average person 2), the following services are available. Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment for further details. Service Transit Des Plaines Metra Station platform; Pace Bus Stops for Lines 226, 230, and 250, and PULSE Downtown Commercial Area Restaurants, retail/personal services including dentist, optometrist, urgent care, private gym, and salons Schools (private and public) Central Elementary School, Willows Academy, Little Bulgarian School, Islamic City Center of Des Plaines Academy Parks Centennial Park, Central Park, Paroubeck Park, Potowatomie Park Public Buildings Library, City Hall A change to the zoning would be necessary to allow residential uses on this property. No new residential uses are permitted within the C-3 zoning district in this location. An analysis of the various options for residential zoning districts is necessary to determine what is best suited for this site. Below is a table of residential zoning districts and the residential uses permitted within them. Residential Districts Use Matrix Use R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Single Family Detached P C* C* C* Townhouse Not permitted Not permitted P P Two-family (duplex) Not permitted P Not permitted Not permitted Multi-Family Not permitted Not permitted P P *Note: Only applies to single-family detached dwellings that were lawfully constructed prior to August 17, 2020 and are located in a zoning district other than R-1. The R-1 and R-2 zoning districts would restrict the density of residential units at the property, limiting the development potential. As the name suggests, the R-1, Single Family Residential district limits the number of dwelling units to one dwelling unit per parcel. The R-2, Two-Family Residential district similarly limits the number of dwellings to two units per parcel. To allow for more than one or two residences on this 1.23-acre property, the property would need to be subdivided. If the property were subdivided to meet the R-1 or R-2 bulk standards, it is unlikely the property could produce more than five residential 2 Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speeds of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, page 17. Page 3 of 132 units. The property is also too small to allow for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which would allow for smaller lots but requires a minimum parcel size of 2 acres (Section 12-3-5.B.3). The R-3, Townhouse Residential and R-4, Central Core Residential districts provide the option to increase the number of units on this parcel without requiring subdivision. Comparatively, a townhouse or multi-family development would supply a greater number of units in the same amount of space, creating a more efficient and economical option for this location. The main difference between the R-3 and R-4 districts is the bulk standards. The table below provides a comparison. R-3 Versus R-4 Bulk Standards Bulk Controls R-3 R-4 Maximum height 45 ft 80 ft Minimum front yard 25 ft 12 ft Minimum side yard Buildings 35 ft. and under: 5 ft. Over 35 ft.: 10 ft. Buildings 35 ft. and under: 5 ft. Over 35 ft.: 10 ft. Minimum rear yard Buildings 35 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 35 ft.: 30 ft. Buildings 40 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 40 ft.: 25 ft., plus 2 ft. for every 10 ft. over 40 ft. Minimum lot width 45 ft. 45 ft. Minimum lot area 2800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit 40,700 sq. ft (.93 acres).1 1. The minimum lot area for a zoning lot in the “R-4 Central Core Residential District” shall be either 10,000 square feet or shall be determined by the total sum of the required minimum lot area of each dwelling unit on the zoning lot in accordance with the table in Section 12-7-2.J. R-3 and R-4 zoning districts both allow for multifamily residential development. However, R-3 requires 2,800 square feet of space per dwelling unit, allowing a maximum of 19 units on this 53,731-square-foot (1.23-acre) property. Compared to R-3, the R-4 district allows for a significantly larger number of residential units, requiring smaller lot areas per unit and allowing for a taller building. Page 4 of 132 Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population The existing housing stock throughout the city is predominantly single-family residential and the Comprehensive Plan states it is a goal to maintain this stock of high-quality single family residential property within the city. However, the detached single family housing type is an increasingly unaffordable product for many existing and future residents. In comparison, townhouses and multi- family provide additional housing stock at a more financially attainable scale due to the smaller size and reduced maintenance cost. An important goal of 2019 Comprehensive Plan is to provide avenues to allow residents to age-in-place and improve accessibility. As of 2015, the percentage of Des Plaines residents 50 or older was 40.2%, compared to the regional average of 31.4%.3 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, this percentage is likely to grow, with one in five Americans at retirement age by 2030.4 Households approaching retirement are frequently interested in downsizing to limit maintenance costs and reduce monthly housing costs to meet limitations of fixed incomes. Supplying a diverse housing stock in this area provides the option for seniors to continue living within the city. A residential development in this location would be close enough to facilities and services for an aging population to independently complete activities of daily living, with many amenities available within walking or transit distance. In terms of accessibility, it is relevant to note that multifamily housing developments, either private or public, with four or more units are required to meet accessibility requirements outlined in the Fair Housing Act.5 This includes provisions requiring certain units to have accessible access, routes, and usable private and common spaces for individuals with disabilities. Note buildings separated by a firewall, such as townhouses, are not subject to these accessibility requirements.6 Additionally, the International Building Code (IBC) requires buildings of a certain size to have at least one elevator and it must be able to accommodate an ambulance stretcher (IBC 2015 Section 3002.4). Overall, multi-family residential developments over a certain size versus single-family detached or attached residences provide a greater likelihood of providing the accessibility needs of an aging population and provide additional housing opportunities for individuals with disabilities regardless of age. With these considerations regarding the location of the property near other R-4 zoned, multi-family properties, the proximity to numerous private and public services, and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan focused on providing diversity of housing stock and providing accessible options for residents, senior or otherwise, the R-4 zoning district is a suitable fit for this property. 3 Des Plaines 2019 Comprehensive Plan, Page 32 https://www.desplaines.org/home/showpublisheddocument/162/637612522934400000 4 U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Older People Projected to Outnumber Children for First Time in U.S. History, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html 5 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Accessibility Requirements for Buildings https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/disabilities/accessibilityR 6 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Act Design Manual, Page 10 https://www.huduser.gov/portal//Publications/PDF/FAIRHOUSING/fairfull.pdf Page 5 of 132 Site Plan Review Proposed Project Overview The petitioner proposes a four story, 56-unit multi-family residential development and associated parking lot and private park space. Note the proposed development is one of two for the former Contour Saws properties; the site to the north will be reviewed and considered as a separate application. This type of development is permitted in the proposed R-4 Central Core Residential district if it follows all bulk regulations and other standards. The below diagram illustrates staff’s interpretation of where the required yards are located for this property, as noted in Section 12-7-2 and defined in Section 12- 13-3. The table on the following page compares the R-4 district regulations with the proposed development on the subject property. R-4 -Central Core Residential District Bulk Standards Bulk Controls Required Proposed Maximum height 80 ft.1 48 ft. Minimum front yard 12 ft. 15 ft. Minimum side yard 5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft.1 Minimum lot width 50 ft. 193.86 ft. Minimum lot area 40,700 sq. ft.2 (refer to Footnote 2 and associated table below) 53,731.42 sq. ft. Notes: 1. Off-street parking spaces are permitted to be located in any required yard, including the rear yard, pursuant to Section 12-9-6.C. 2. The minimum lot area for a zoning lot in the “R-4 Central Core Residential District” shall be Page 6 of 132 either 10,000 square feet or shall be determined by the total sum of the required minimum lot area of each dwelling unit on the zoning lot in accordance with the following table, whichever is greater: Number Of Bedrooms Minimum Lot Area (Square Feet) Efficiency dwelling unit 600 1 bedroom 700 sq. ft. minimum required lot area * 41 units proposed = 28,700 sq. ft. of lot area required 2 bedrooms 800 sq. ft. minimum required lot area * 15 units = 12,000 sq. ft. of lot area required Total Required Lot Area: 40,700 sq ft Site Plan Review Standards Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, a Site Plan Review is required for all map amendment requests to assess how the request meets the characteristics identified in Section 12-3-2, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the current Site Plan provided by the petitioner, located in the Site Plan attachment. Note many of the provided plans include an entrance/exit from the alley. However, the developer has chosen to remove this proposed driveway in favor of one entrance entering and exiting. The Site Plan attachment provides the most up to date plan; this plan was used to complete the Site Plan Review below. All other updated plans, including an updated traffic study, will be provided with any future Planning and Zoning Board and City Council packets, and will be uploaded onto the desplaines.org/contourplace when available. Site Plan Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) The arrangement of structures on the site • Places the building along the street frontage rather than the parking lot. By placing a building along a street rather than the parking lot, the design presents better cohesion with the buildings surrounding it by placing the building at approximately the same distance from the property line as adjacent multi-family buildings. • A more efficient design would involve the placement of parking in a parking garage underneath the building, rather than surface parking. However, it is unknown the expense and the impact on economic viability for this project Page 7 of 132 if this site design change were required. Taking into consideration the current use (vacant surface parking lot), the proposed development provides a substantially more efficient use of the property. The arrangement of open space and landscape improvements • Landscaping is provided around the building in excess of requirements along the front yard and perimeter parking lot landscaping meets zoning requirements. In addition, a private park space is proposed, as noted on the plans. Refer to Landscape Plan attachment. • Staff advises the movement of the shade tree shown on the landscape plan from the corner between Oakwood Avenue and the alley to improve visibility for vehicles and pedestrians entering and exiting the driveway. The tree will need to be located elsewhere on the property and staff will confirm the landscape plan includes the required amount of parking lot landscaping at time of building permit. The adequacy of the proposed circulation system on the site • Curb cut closed onto Graceland, pushing traffic to Oakwood Ave. and the alley. The traffic study provided with this application demonstrates that proposed traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. It is important to note the existing parking lot includes over one hundred parking spaces and the Contour Saws facility likely generated a greater amount of traffic for employees and deliveries than proposed with this residential development. The Board may seek to ask the petitioner if they anticipate any significant changes to traffic with the updated site plan (eliminating the entrance/exit of the parking lot into the alley) not reflected in the traffic impact study. • The closure of a curb cut along Graceland Ave and replacing it with a parkway and walkway improves safety and comfort for pedestrians along this side of Graceland. The proximity of the building to the street also provides better surveillance within the neighborhood, with windows facing the residential neighborhood and providing additional “eyes on the street.” • A loading/unloading zone within the development eliminates traffic on the adjacent streets and alley for deliveries, dumpster pickup, and ride sharing for proposed future residents and visitors. Page 8 of 132 • Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12-9-7, providing sixty-five spaces, which is the minimum required amount. It is anticipated, as discussed in the petitioner’s response to standards and the provided traffic study, that the proximity of the site to numerous transit options and a bike route along Thacker St, will reduce dependence on automobiles for this project. The location, design, and screening of proposed off-street parking areas • Perimeter landscaping, including required shrubs and shade trees, are provided around the proposed parking lot. A private park blocks some view of the parking lot from Oakwood Ave. • Site is situated in such a way that the parking lot has minimum visibility from Graceland Avenue and Oakwood Avenue and minimal conflict with pedestrians along public walkways. The adequacy of the proposed landscaping design on the site • All required landscaping in terms of perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping and landscaping of required yards is fulfilled. • Private park space provided in the southwestern area of the property with accessible walking path to the building and from Oakwood Ave. The design, location, and installation of proposed site illumination • Photometric plan demonstrates conformance with Section 12-12-10, with no more than 0.2- foot candles spilling over the property line in any location, well within the limits of the zoning ordinance. • The parking lot is properly illuminated, with at least one footcandle in any parking area, meeting requirements of Section 12-9-6.G. The correlation of the proposed site plan with adopted land use policies, goals, and objectives of the comp. plan • Does not fit the manufacturing use illustrated by the Comprehensive Plan; however, the 2019 plan was written on the assumption that the Contour Saw facility will continue operating. • The proposed plan supports the following goals (refer to “Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population” and “C-3 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-4 Zoning” sections of this report for further details): o Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs. o Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points Page 9 of 132 o Goal 4.5 – Plan for and identify policies and tools that ensure accessibility • In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. Summary of Public Outreach In an effort to improve community engagement and transparency surrounding new, large developments within Des Plaines, the City provided numerous opportunities for residents to review the proposal and provide input. To provide regular project updates, a webpage on the city website was created: desplaines.org/contourplace. On June 6, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Board hosted a public workshop to provide the developer, board, and the public an opportunity to review plans and provide input into the proposed development at this location and the former Contour Saws facility to the north of this property. After this meeting, the project webpage was updated to include a public input form to continue gathering community comments on the plans. Refer to Public Comment attachment for all public comments. PZB Recommendation and Conditions: The PZB held a public hearing on July 25, 2023 to consider the request. Their rationale for recommendations is captured in the excerpt to the approved minutes from the meeting. The PZB voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the map amendment. Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.G.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council has final authority to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the request, which would be approved by Ordinance Z-34-23. Attachments: Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Site and Context Photos Attachment 3: Narrative and Response to Standards Attachment 4: Amenities and Services Map Attachment 5: Plat of Survey Attachment 6: Site Plan Attachment 7: Architectural Plans Attachment 8: Landscape Plans Attachment 9: Engineering Plans Attachment 10: Photometric Plan Attachment 11: Traffic Impact Study without Appendices 7 Attachment 12: Property Tax Projections Attachment 13: Public Comments Attachment 14: Chairman Szabo PZB Recommendation Letter Attachment 15: Excerpt of Approved Minutes from the July 25, 2023 PZB Meeting Ordinance Z-34-23 7 Full copy available upon request to the Community and Economic Development department. Page 10 of 132 Legend Zoning and Development Zoning C-1: Neighborhood Shopping C-3: General Commercial C-4: Regional Shopping C-5: Central Business M-1: Limited Manufacturing M-2: General Manufacturing R-1: Single Family Residential R-3: Townhouse Residential R-4: Central Core Residential NotesPrint Date: 7/20/202305001000 ft Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground. Subject Site Attachment 1 Page 11 of 132 Public Notice Sign 1, facing property northeastPublic Notice Sign 2, facing property southeastView of existing parking lot facing alley to northeast; degraded pavementView of parking lot and adjacement multifamily development as well asexisting Contour Saw facility facing northwestAttachment 2 Page 12 of 132 Graceland and Thacker Development East Side of Graceland Avenue (Site B) NARRATIVE The subject property contains approximately 53,472 sq. ft. of land and is improved with a surface parking lot with approximately 145 spaces. The exiting parking lot has no landscaping and was used in connection with Contours Saw, Inc.’s operations at the site across Graceland from the parking lot. The property is currently zoned C-3. The Applicant for the rezoning proposes to redevelop the property with a four-story building containing 56 residential units, comprised of 41 one-bedroom units and 15 two-bedroom units. Sixty-four surface parking spaces will be located on-site, including three ADA spaces and two EV spaces. The proposed building’s height will be 50 feet. Drop-off/Loading Zone will be provided adjacent to the proposed building’s front door. The parking lot will be accessed via two driveways, one accessed from the 20 ft. public alley immediately adjacent to the rear of the site and a second from Oakwood Avenue. The façade materials will be primarily face brick, with fiber cement panels used on some sections. Attachment 3 Page 13 of 132 STANDARDS FOR MAP AMENDMENTS 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, as adopted February 2019. The proposed rezoning will allow for the construction of multi-family housing near multi-modal facilities and Downtown, as the subject site is approximately five blocks from the Miner St. Metra Station and Downtown. It also will promote the development of multi-family units that would increase the housing diversity and provide housing for individuals and couples, and also aging residents that seek to continue an independent lifestyle while minimizing maintenance and ownership obligations. In addition, the supply of additional housing will assist in decreasing affordability concerns due to increased supply. 2. The proposed amendment is compatible with current conditions and the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The subject property is adjacent to an R-4 district to the north that extends north along Graceland and is generally developed with three, four and five-story multi-family buildings. 3. The proposed amendment is appropriate considering the adequacy of public facilities and services available to this subject property. There are sufficient public facilities in terms of utilities to accommodate R-4 development, with stormwater detention being required for new developments per the Des Plaines municipal code. The existing streets can accommodate the anticipated traffic, which traffic may also be reduced due to the proximity of public transportation via Metra, the existing bike corridor along Thacker and the proposed bike corridor along Graceland. In terms of public open space, Central Park is located approximately three blocks east. 4. The proposed amendment will not have an adverse effect on the value of properties throughout the jurisdiction. Because the proposed amendment will allow for development of multi-family residential of a scale compatible with adjacent properties and in a location where sufficient public facilities exist and resulting traffic can be accommodated, it will not have an adverse impact on property values within the City. In addition, the increase in tax base will help alleviate future tax increases on other properties and the increased Attachment 3 Page 14 of 132 resident population will support existing area businesses, both of which will positively impact the property value of other properties. 5. The proposed amendment reflects responsible standards for development and growth. The proposed amendment is consistent with responsible standard for development and growth by promoting increase density at a location where it can be accommodated that is proximate to public transit and non-vehicular travel paths, such as bike corridors. It increases the utilization of existing municipal infrastructure without taxing such infrastructure and does so while enhancing the municipal tax base. Attachment 3 Page 15 of 132 REAL PROPERTY TAX BASE IMPACT The 2021 real property taxes for the property were $43,958.09. The anticipated real property taxes for the property after completion and occupancy of the proposed development will be $224,000 (2023 dollars). Attachment 3 Page 16 of 132 Library City Hall Metra Station Services within 0.5 Mile of Subject SiteSchool Park Place of Interest Bus Stop Bus Route Subject Site Attachment 4 Page 17 of 132 Attachment 5 Page 18 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 3 Ground Level Plan 60’ Attachment 6 Page 19 of 132 Luz and Associates #1 LLC Owner/Developer: Issued for PZB Hearing | July 18, 2023 Des Plaines, Illinois Graceland and Oakwood Architect: TH A C K E R S T . TH A C K E R S T .LEE ST.LEE ST.GRACELAND AVE.GRACELAND AVE.OAKWOO D AVE.OAKWOO D AVE. SITE Attachment 7 Page 20 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 2 Zoning Map & Location Map ZONING MAP LOCATION MAP O'Hare International Airport Village of Mount Prospect Village of Rosemont City of Chicago Village of Rosemont City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County Village of Mount Prospect UnincorporatedCook CountyUnincorporatedCook CountyVillage of Mount Prospect Elk Grove Village !5 !2 !1 !6!8 !7 !4 !9 !11 !10 !3 !21 !31 !14 !15 ^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Axehead Lake Shagbark Lake Big Bend Lake Lake MaryanneUniversityLake Lake BelleauDesPlainesRiver D e s Plain es Ri verDesPlainesRiverDesPlain e s R iverDesPlainesRiverWellersCreekWellersCreekWellersCreekWellersCreek WillowCreekHigginsCr eekHigginsCreek Will o wCr eekLake OpekaHigginsCreek Farm e r 's C reekFarmer's CreekPeterson Lake Prairie Creek WillowCreekWellers Creek 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1300 E 1400 E 1500 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 3200 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W 2400 E 2600 E2500 S 2600 S 2200 E2500 S 2500 E 500 W 2100 E2600 S 2300 E2100 S 2600 S 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1400 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W2600 S 2400 E2500 S 2100 S 2200 E 1300 E 1500 E3200 2600 E2600 S 2500 E2600 S 2100 E 500 W 2300 E2500 S MIDDLETONCTCASTLEREALNDURSEYLNKYLEMORECTCALLENLNMIDDLETONLNWATERFORDDRKENMAREDRLISMOREDRWOLFRDLONGFORDDRWEXFORDCTCTMADELYNDRWISCONSINDR KATHLEEN DRMADELYN DRMEADOWDRI-294I-294SECOND AVESIXTHAVEMEYERCTFLETCHERDRNORTHWEST H WY UNIVERSITY STBELLAIRECTWILKINSDRMARSHALLDRMICHAELCTSHANNONCT DARAJAMESRDORCHARDCTARLINGTONAVELAURELAVEI-294 PARSONSAVE CRESTWO O D D R S H AWNLNWALNUTAVE ANDERSONTEREEASTVILLADRNORTHEASTPLNOR TH W E S T P L S O U T H EAS TPLAPPLECREEKLNC RABTREEL N B U S S E H WY KINKAIDCT KROWKA DRANDERSONTERSANDERSONTERE WAYNEDR DENNISPL CARO L L N SHAGBARKDRCORASTWINDSORDR JEFFERYLN LANCASTERLNDAYTONPL I-90 CEDA R CT I-90 I-90 MAPLESTI-294LEESTPETERRDGREENLE AF AV E PAULAL N N I M ITZDRH A LSEYDRC R AIGDRCARLOW DRKENMARECTBENDING CENTRAL RDBERKSHIRECT C IR C LEDRCOLLEGEDR(O.C.C .D R )DRAKELNCUMBERLANDPKYYALE CT DESPLAINESRIVERRDGOLF RDMINER ST BROWN ST DES PLAINES RIVER RDWOOD LAND AV ERAND RD E M ER SON S TSUFFIELDSTDAWN CTJOSEPH SC H W A B R D /CAMPG R O U N D RD RIVER DRBERRY LNWESTVILLADROAKWOODAVE SOUTH PARK AVE WASHINGTON ST EISENHOWER DRNORTH PARK AV E TOUHY AVE STOCKTON AVE HOLIDAY LN MUR R AYLNHORNETERDEMPSTER ST PRAIR IE A V EWESTMERERDLAWNLNBRENTWOODDR RAND RDRAND RDRAND RDMARK AVETHERESE TERTIMOTHY LNYORKSHIRE LNREGENCY DRBERKSHIRE LNNELSON LNDEVON AVESTILLWELL DRSUNS E T D RSCOTT STSOUTH LNPATTON DRHIGGI N S R DMANNHEIM RDORCHARD PLSYCAMORE STCENTRAL AVE NIMITZ DR NORTHSHORE AVECURTIS STI -294RUSTY DRPEARLE DRJOSEPH AVEDAVID DR FOX LNSCOTT STA L D E N L N MORSE AV MAPLE STMORSE AVE ANDY LNFARWELL AVE I-90WOLF RDSANTA ROSA DRMOUNTPROSPECTRDTOUHY AVE I-90 I-90 GRECO AVE LUNT AVE ESTES AVEDALE STGREENLEAF AVE ESTES AVE EISENHOWERDRIRIS LNRUSTYDRESTES AV LAURA LN PARKWOOD LNCRAIG DRTOUHY AVEROBERTCOOMBS CTTOUH Y C T CHASE AVE MAGNOLIA STSCOTT STCEDAR STJARVIS AV SHERWIN AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCH STSHERWIN AVE FARGO AVE PINE STWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DREASTVIEW DRJARLATH AVELMIRA AVEDOUGLAS AVESPRUCEWOOD AVEI-90ELMHURST RDI-90W I L L E R D MOUNT PROSPECT RDHOWARD AVE BRADROCK DR HOWARD AVE TURESLN NEBEL LNPLAINFIELD DRDEXTER LNIRWIN AVE HOWARD AVE EVERETT LN PROSPECT LN KOEHLER DRSTOCKTON AVE SHEPHERD DRPROSPECT AVE PINE STHOWARD AVECIRCLESTDEANE ST HOWARD AVE MAPLE STPROSPECT AVE CEDAR STBIRCH STDESPLAI NESRI VERRDLOCUST STKENNICOTT CT LOCUST ST EVERETT AVE SYCAMORE STORCHARD STLINDEN STWHITE STRIVERVIEW AVEELM STCHESTNUT STBITTERSWEET CTBRIAR CT MA NN HE IM R D EVERETT AVELEE STHAZEL CT SPRUCE AVEASH STOAKTON PLEVERETT AVEWEBSTER LNOAKTON ST WINTHROP DROAKTON ST MARSHALL DRWILLE RD DOVER LNPLEASANT LN SHORT TEROAKTON STSUSAN DRJOYCE DRCOURTESY LN DOVER DR CORDIAL DR RIDGE LNMARSHALL DRMIAMI LNDENVERDR DOVERDR RAWLS RD OXFORD RDWEDGEWOOD AVLINCOLN AVECINDY LNLINCOLN AVE OAKTON ST FAIRMONTCT LINCOLN AVE MARGRET STSECOND AVEWICKE AVE OAKTON STTIMES DRFOREST AVE OAKTON ST SANBORN STKYLEMORE DR LINCOLN AVE WICKE AVE O A K T O N S TMAPLE STSTEWART A V E DES PLA INES R IVER RD FOREST AVEWHITE STVAN BUREN AVE CENTER STCORA STDEANE STLEE STJEANNETTE STOLIVIA AVE VAN BUREN AVE SECOND AVEEARL AVETHIRD AVWEBSTER LNFOREST AVEFIFTH AVESIXTH AVEFOREST AVEWOLF RDALGONQUIN RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDWESTFIELD LN ROXBURY LN DIAMOND HEAD DR PHOENIXDRALGONQUIN RD KOLPIN DRANDREA LNALGONQUIN RD JILL CTCOLONIAL LNMORRAY CT LESLIE LNELMHURSTRDBEAU DRARNOLD CTWILLSONDRSEYMOUR AVEARNOLD CTWILLSON DRPERDA LNMARSHALL DREAKER PL DOROTHY DRHEWITT DRKINKAID CT FLORIAN DR MC CAIN C T WALNUT AVEWOLF RDALGONQUIN RDWEST GRANT DRHOFFMAN PKY WALNUT CT WALNUT CTTHIRD AVEWEBSTER LNSECOND AVEWALNUT AVEEAST GRANT DRJEANNETTE STMARGRET STALGONQUIN RD LEE STCAMPBELL AVE HENRY AVE WALNUT AVE OAKWOOD AVE ALGONQUIN RD ALGONQUIN RD RANDRD PARKVIEW LNACRES LNBU S S E H W Y MASON LNTHACKER ST WHITE STASHLAND AVE CENTER STOAKWOOD AVE ALFINI DRASHLAND AVE OAKWOOD AVE WESTGATE RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDSPRUANCE PLINGRAM PLDEMPSTER ST CLARK LNKING LN BEAU CT MILLERS RD KATHLEEN DR CAVAN LNELMHURST RDBEAU DRAMBLESIDE RDMARSHALLDRLANCE DRMANOR CTCITADEL CTTERRACE LN MILLERS RD WARRINGTON RDKENILWORTH CTWOLF R D GREENVIEW AVESIXTH AVPRAIRIE AVE WALTER AVETHIRD AVTHACKER ST SECOND AVEROSE AV E FIRST AVELAUREL AVEGRACELAND AVEMA R I O N S T TH A C K E R S T LEE STCENTER STPEARSON STMI N E R S T RANDRD GARLAND PLMINER ST LYMAN AVESEMINARY AVE DEMPSTER ST PRAIRIE AVE POTTER RDBALLARD RDLYMAN AVERITA RDEDWARD CTGOOD AVEBELLAIRE AVEBALLARD RD TRAILSIDE LNBENDER RDWOODS RDELK BLLEE STJEFFERSON STGRACELAND AVELAUREL AVEPERRY STJEFFERSON STPERRY STBROWN STWASHINGTON ST IDA STWEBFORDAVEGREENVIEW AVEFIRST AVEHOLLYWOOD AVEWOODLAWN AVEFIFTH AVEINNOVATIONDRBRADLEY STWASHINGTON STLASALLE STBEDFORD LNWESTGATE RDANITA STFREMONT AVEFREMONT CTWESTMERE RDGALLEON WAYBRADLEY STDULLESRDBRADLEY CTFARTHING LNDULLESRDDEBRA DREASY STBELL DRWESTMERE RDDEBRA DRSANDY LNLILLIAN LNDULLES RDBEAU DRJON CTBENNETT LNNORMANCTMICHAELRDLYNN CTRADCLIFFE AVEHARVEY AVECOLUMBIA AVEHARDING AVEANITA STEVERGREEN AVEMOUNT PROSPECT RDHARVEY AVECOLUMBIA AVEHARDING AVEWARRINGTON RDCUMBERLAND PKYHARVEY AVECOLUMBIA AVEHARDING AVEWASHINGTON STOXFORD RDCOLUMBIA AVEWOODBRIDGE RDWOLFRDWIEBOLDTDRNORTH AVE ALLES STHARDING AV WILLOW AVEVERGREEN AV OAK STHILLS AVESHERMAN PL GROVE AVELK BLHAWTHORNE TERJUNIOR TERHAWTHORNE LNSHERWOOD RD BIG BEND DRLYMAN AVELECHNER LN IRONWOOD DRCHURCH STGOOD CT POTTER RDBENDER RDSAKAS DRSEEGERS RDSEVENTHAVENORTHWEST HWYHARVEY AVEBROADWAY STGOLF RDWARRINGTONRDDAVIS CTJOSEPHINE CTMARINA DRMORGAN O BRIEN STCOUNCIL TRLSTATE STSTRATFORD RDDRAKE LNARDMORE RDFIFTHAVETHIRD AVENORTH GOLF CUL DE SACSOUTH GOLF CUL DE SAC RAND RD MARY STRE D E K E R R D EAST RIVER RDWAIKIKI DRTHIRD AVEWOLF RDCORNELL AVEPRINCETON STCAMBRIDGE RDSTONE STAMHERSTAVECRANBROOK DRRADCLIFFE AVEVASSAR LNAMHERST AVEPINEHURST DRHARVARD STSIMONE DRSTRATFORD RDSEVENTH AVESIXTH AVEPOLYNESIAN DRLUAU DRFIFTH AVEFOURTH AVECONCORD LNTHIRD AVCONCORD CTPATRICIA LNMARCELLARDRAND RDTIMOTHYLNWATERFORDCTWOLF RDWOLF RDCENTRAL RD CENTRAL RD CENTRAL RDCENTRAL RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDALBANY LNCLAYTON LNTRACY TERJON LNNORTHWEST HWYMOUNT PROSPECT RDVILLAGE CTINNER CIRCLE DRWESTGATE RDGOLF RDGOLF RDGOLF RDGOLF RDELMHURST RDSEEGERS RDFOURTH AVELANCE DR AMBLESIDE RDLEAHY CIRCLE EMILLERS RD KATHLEEN DRLITTLE PATH RDROSE AVE WESTERN AVEWEBFORD AVE RIVER ST TOUHY AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE CLEARWATER DRWOLF RDOXFORD RDPLAINFIELD DRWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DRJARVIS AVE CHESTNUT STASH STHIGHLAND DRSPRUCE AVELEE STFRONTAGE RDMANNHEIM RD BIRCHWOOD AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE FARGO AVE WELWYN AVESIXTH AVEELIZABETH LN FOURTH AVI-294DESPLAINESRIVERRDGR EGORY STHALPINDRO'C O NNOR DR CIRCULARA V E WESLEYDRP E O N Y L N FLORALNCLARKAVEQUIGLEYDRMARYVILLEWAYMULCAHEYDRCLANCYDR M O T T I E R D R KINGSLEYAVFOURTH AVEFIFTH CT VICTORIA RDOAKWOOD CT OAKWOOD CT FORESTEDGELNWILSON LNEIGHTH AVEBENNETT PLDANBURYLNRIVER DR JARVIS AVE CTHICKORY STPRATT AVE PRATT AVE JARVIS AVE GOLF RD TOUHY AVE THACKER ST I-294I-294I-294I-90 I-90 DESPLAI NESRI VERRDCLAYTON CT OTTAWA ST EXECUTIVE WAY GERI LNGOLF RD SOUTHWESTPLHORNETERBERKSHIRELN ELLINWO O D S T METROPOLITAN WAYMARKET ST BUC KI N G H AM D RMILL ST CORA STLEAHY CIRCLE ES T A R K P L LEAHY CIRCLE S MUNROECIRCLES KING LN DEVONSHIRE DR ELIZABETH LN PINEELMHURST RDLINCOLN LNDOREEN DRVAN BUREN AV HEATHER LNKINGSTON CTWHITCOMB AVE ILLINOIS STWOLF RDNAZARETH WAYCOLLINS DR DORAN DRR U S T YDRMEADOW CTYALE CTYALE CTGOLF RD PENNSYLVANIAAVEFIGARD LN PROVIDENCE DR WILDFLOWER STBIRCH ST PRAIRIEAV E LYMAN AVEWARRINGTON RDEXECUTIVE WAYTIMOTHY LNBERKSHIRE LNDRAKE LNBRADLEY ST LEE STSEEGERS RDHANBURY DRHANBURY DRAMBLESIDE RDDOVERDR WINDS O R D R SPRINGFIELDTER SPRINGFIELD TER PENNSYLVANIA AVEDOVERDRHANBURY DRROXBURY CT TURESLNUnion Pacific Railroad Union Pacific RailroadUnion Pacific Railroad Union Pacific Railroad (Milwaukee Line)Union Pacific Railroad Union Pacific Railroad (Milwaukee Line)Canadian National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)Union Pacific Railroad (NW Line)Union Pacific Railroad (NW Line) Un i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e )Seegers Wye(Milwaukee Line)CanadianBLACKHAWKPARK SEMINOLE PARK WESTFIELD GARDENS CRAIGMANORPARK TERRACE SCHOOL GARDEN PLOTS WOODLAWNPARKDES PLAINES MANOR PARKKYLEMOREGREENS EATON FIELDCHEYENNEPARKCHEROKEE PARK ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEISURE CENTER WILLOWPARK MOHAWKPARKDIMUCCI-LOWENBERGPARK JAYCEE PARK SIOUXPARKHAWAIIPARK ROSEMARY S. ARGUS FRIENDSHIP PARK SESQUICENTENNIALPARK APACHE PARK CHIPPEWAPARK CENTRAL PARK IROQUOIS POOL CORNELLPARK MAJEWSKI METRO ATHLETIC COMPLEX MENOMINEEPARKWESTPARKTETONPARKCUMBERLANDTERRACE WINNEBAGO PARK KIWANIS PARK KUTCHENPARK EINSTEIN PARK POTOWATOMIE PARK PAROUBECK PARK BRENTWOODPARKNORTHSHIREPARKTOMAHAWKPARK IROQUOIS PARK HIGH RIDGE KNOLLS PARK ARNDT PARK DEVONSHIRE PARK PRAIRIE LAKES PARK RAND PARK LAKE PARK NORTH GOLF CUL DE SAC PARK MCKAY-NEALIS PARK SOUTH GOLF CULDE SAC PARK MYSTIC WATERS CHIPPEWA POOLYALE CT PARKELandmarks!1City Hall - 1420 Miner St!2Police Department - 1418 Miner St!3Fire Station 1 - 405 S Des Plaines River Rd!4Fire Station 2 - 1313 E Oakton St!5Fire Station 3 - 130 Thacker St!6Library - 1501 Ellinwood St!7Public Works - 1111 Joseph Schwab Rd!8Downtown Train Station - 1501 Miner St!9Cumberland Train Station - 475 Northwest Hwy!10Post Office - 1000 E Oakton St !11Post Office Annex - 684 Lee St!21Prairie Lakes Center - 515 Thacker St!31Rivers Casino - 3000 S Des Plaines River Rd!14Des Plaines Senior Center - 52 Northwest Hwy!15Des Plaines Historical Society - 781 Pearson St 1:14,073 03,2506,500 Feet Date of last map update: April 11, 2022Check out www.desplaines.org/explore-our-city/city-map-gallery to view the most up to datezoning information with the interactive city map.Zoning District LegendMinimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Size2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU 10,000 Sq. Ft (Minimum)2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU (Interior)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Corner)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Interior)8,125 Sq. Ft. (Corner)CommercialNeighborhood ShoppingC-1 Limited Office CommercialC-2 General CommercialC-3 Regional ShoppingC-4 Central BusinessC-5 Casino DistrictC-6C-7 High Density Campus Commercial InstitutionalInstitutionalI-1 OtherPlanned Unit Development^ManufacturingSpecial ManufacturingM-3 General ManufacturingM-2 Limited ManufacturingM-1Single Family ResidentialSingle Family ResidentialR-1 Multi Family ResidentialR-3 Mobile HomeM-H Townhouse ResidentialCentral Core ResidentialR-4 Two Family ResidentialR-2 O'Hare International Airport Village of Mount Prospect Village of Rosemont City of Chicago Village of Rosemont City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County Village of Mount Prospect Unincorporated Cook County Unincorporated Cook County Village of Mount Prospect Elk Grove Village !5 !2 !1 !6!8 !7 !4 !9 !11 !10 !3 !21 !31 !14 !15 ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Axehead Lake Shagbark Lake Big Bend Lake Lake Maryanne University Lake Lake BelleauDesPlainesRiver DesPlainesRi verDesPlainesRiverDesPlain e s R iverDesPl ai ne s Ri v e r Wellers Creek WellersCree k WellersCreekWel l ers C re e k Willow CreekHigginsCreekHigginsCreek Will owCr eekLake OpekaHigginsCreek Farm e r 's C ree kFarmer's CreekPeterson Lake Prairie Creek WillowCreekWellers Creek 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1300 E 1400 E 1500 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 3200 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W 2400 E 2600 E2500 S 2600 S 2200 E2500 S 2500 E 500 W 2100 E2600 S 2300 E2100 S 2600 S 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1400 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W2600 S 2400 E2500 S 2100 S 2200 E 1300 E 1500 E3200 2600 E2600 S 2500 E2600 S 2100 E 500 W 2300 E2500 S MIDDLETONCTC A S T L E RE A L N D U RSEY LN KYLEMORE CTCALLENLNMIDDLETONLN WATERFORDDR KE N M A R E D RLISMOREDR WOLFRDL O N GFOR DDRWEXFORDCTCT MADELYN DR WIS CONSINDR KATHLEEN DR MADELYN DRMEADOWDRI-294I-294SECOND AVESIXTHAVEM EYERCTFLETCHERDR NORTHWEST HWY UNIVERSITY ST BELLAIRECT WILKINSDRMARSHALLDRM I C H A E L CTSHANNONCT DARAJAMESRDORCHARDCTARLINGTONAVELAURELAVEI-294 PARSONSA VECRESTW O O DDRSHAWNLNWALNUT AVE ANDERSONTEREEASTVILLADRNORTHEAS T PLNORTHWEST PLSOUTHEAS TPLAPPLECREEKLNC RABTR EEL N BUSSEHWYKINKAIDCT KROWKA DRAN DERSON TER S ANDERSONTEREWAYNEDR DENN IS P L CARO L LN SHAGBARKDRCORASTW I N D S O R D R J E F F E R Y L N LAN CA S T E R L NDAYTONPL I-90 CEDA R CT I-90 I-90 MAPLESTI-294LEESTPETERRDGREENLEAF AV E PAULAL N N I M IT ZDR H A LS EYDR C R A IG DRCARLOW DRKENMAR E CT BENDING CENTRAL RD BERKSHIRE CT C IR C LE DRCOLLEGEDR(O.C.C .D R )DRAKELN C UMBERL ANDPKYYALE CT DESPLAI NESRIV ERRDGOLF RD MIN E R S T BROWN ST DES PLAINES RIVER RDWOODLAND AVE RAN D R D EMERSON S T SUFFIELD ST DAWN CTJOSEPHSCHW ABRD/CAMPGROUNDRD RIVER DRBERRY LNWESTVILLADROAKWOODAVE SOUTH PARK AVE WASHINGTON ST EISENHOWER DRNORTH PARK A V E TOUHY AVE STOCKTON AVE HOLIDAY LN MUR RAYLNHORNETERDEMPSTER ST PRAIRIE A V E WESTMERERDLAWNLNBRENTWOO D D R RA N D R D RA N D R D RA N D R D MARK AVE THERESE TER TIMOTHY LNYORKSHIRE LN REGENCY DRBERKSHIRE LNNELSON LNDEVON AVESTILLWELL DRSUNS E T D RSCOTT STSOUTH LNPATTON DRHIGGI N S R DMANNHEIM RDORCHARD PLSYCAMORE STCENTRAL AVE NIMITZ DR NORTHSHORE AVECURTIS STI -294RUSTY DRPEARLE DRJOSEPH AVEDAVID DR FOX LNSCOTT STALDEN LN MORSE AV MAPLE STMORSE AVE ANDY LNFARWELL AVE I-90WOLF RDSANTA ROSA DRMOUNTPROSPECTRDTOUHY AVE I-90 I-90 GRECO AVE LUNT AVE ESTES AVEDALE STGREENLEAF AVE ESTES AVE EISENHOWERDRIRIS LNRUSTYDRESTES AV LAURA LN PARKWOOD LNCRAIG DRTOUHY AVEROBERTCOOMBS CTTOUHY CT CHASE AVE MAGNOLIA STSCOTT STCEDAR STJARVIS AV SHERWIN AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCH STSHERWIN AVE FARGO AVE PINE STWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DREASTVIEW DRJARLATH AVELMIRA AVEDOUGLAS AVESPRUCEWOOD AVEI-90ELMHURST RDI-90WILLE RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDHOWARD AVE BRADROCK DR HOWARD AVE T U R E S L N NEBEL LN PLAINFIELD DRDEXTER LNIRWIN AVE HOWARD AVE EVERETT LN PROSPECT LN KOEHLER DRSTOCKTON AVE SHEPHERD DRPROSPECT AVE PINE STHOWARD AVECIRCLESTDEANE ST HOWARD AVE MAPLE STPROSPECT AVE CEDAR STBIRCH STDESPLAI NESRI VERRDLOCUST STKENNICOTT CT LOCUST ST EVERETT AVE SYCAMORE STORCHARD STLINDEN STWHITE STRIVERVIEW AVEELM STCHESTNUT STBITTERSWEET CTBRIAR CT MANN HEIM RD EVERETT AVELEE STHAZEL CT SPRUCE AVEASH STOAKTON PLEVERETT AVEWEBSTER LNOAKTON ST WINTHROP DROAKTON ST MARSHALL DRWILLE RD DOVER LNPLEASANT LN SHORT TEROAKTON STSUSAN DRJOYCE DRCOURTESY LN DOVER DR CORDIAL DR RIDGE LNMARSHALL DRMIAMI LNDENVER DR DOVERDR RAWLS RD OXFORD RDWEDGEWOOD AVLINCOLN AVE CINDY LNLINCOLN AVE OAKTON ST FA IR MONT CT LINCOLN AVE MARGRET STSECOND AVEWICKE AVE OAKTON STTIMES DRFOREST AVE OAKTON ST SANBOR N S T KYLEMORE DR LINCOLN AVE WICKE AVE O A K T O N S TMAPLE STSTEWART A V E DES PLA INES R IVER RD FOREST AVEWHITE STVAN BUREN AVE CENTER STCORA STDEANE STLEE STJEANNETTE STOLIVIA AVE VAN BUREN AVE SECOND AVEEARL AVETHIRD AVWEBSTER LNFOREST AVEFIFTH AVESIXTH AVEFOREST AVE WOLF RDALGONQUIN RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDWESTFIELD LN ROXBURY LN DIAMOND HEAD DR PHOENIXDRALGONQUIN RD KOLPIN DRANDREA LNALGONQUIN RD JILL CTCOLONIAL LNMORRAY CT LESLIE LNELMHURSTRDBEAU DRARNOLD CTWILLSONDRSEYMOUR AVEARNOLD CTWILLSON DRPERDA LNMARSHALL DREAKER PL DOROTHY DR HEWITT DRKINKAID CT FLORIAN DR MC CAIN C T WALNUT AVE WOLF RDALGONQUIN RD WEST GRANT DRHOFFMAN PKY WALNUT CT WALNUT CTTHIRD AVEWEBSTER LNSECOND AVEWALNUT AVEEAST GRANT DRJEANNETTE STMARGRET STALGONQUIN RD LEE STCAMPBELL AVE HENRY AVE WALNUT AVE OAKWOOD AVE ALGONQUIN RD ALGONQUIN RD RANDRD PARKVIEW LNACRES LNBU S S E H W Y MASON LNTHACKER ST WHITE STASHLAND AVE CENTER STOAKWOOD AVE ALFINI DRASHLAND AVE OAKWOOD AVE WESTGATE RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDSPRUANCE PLINGRAM PLDEMPSTER ST CLARK LNKING LN BEAU CT MILLERS RD KATHLEEN DR CAVAN LNELMHURST RDBEAU DRAMBLESIDE RD MARSHALLDRLANCE DR MANOR CTCITADEL CTTERRACE LN MILLERS RD WARRINGTON RDKENILWORTH CTWOLF RD GREE N VI E W A V E SIXTH AVPRAIRIE AVE WALTER AVETHIRD AVTHACKER ST SECOND AVEROSE AVE FIRST AVELAUREL AVEGRACELAND AVEMA R I O N S T TH A C K E R S T LEE STCENTER STPEARSON STMI N E R S T RANDRD GARLAND PLMINER ST LYMAN AVESEMINARY AVE DEMPSTER ST PRAIRIE AVE POTTER RDBALLARD RDLYMAN AVERITA RDEDWARD CTGOOD AVEBELLAIRE AVEBALLARD RD TRAILSIDE LNBENDER RDWOODS RD ELK BLLEE STJEFFERSON STGRACELAND AVELAUREL AVEPERRY ST JEFFERSON ST PERRY ST BROWN ST WASHINGTON ST IDA STWEBFORDAVE GREENVIEW AVEFIRST AVE HOLLYWOOD AVE WOODLAWN AVE FIFTH AVEIN N O V A T IO N D R BRADLEY ST WASHINGTON ST LASALLE STBEDFORD LNWESTGATE RDANITA STFREMONT AVEFREMONT CT WESTMERE RD GALLEON WAYBRADLEY ST DULLES RD BRADLEY CTFARTHING LNDULLES RD DEBRA DR EASY STBELL DRWESTMERE RD DEBRA DR SANDY LNLILLIAN LNDULLES RDBEAU DRJON CTBENNETT LNNOR M A N C T M IC H A E L R D LYNN CTRADCLIFFE AVEHARVEY AVE COLUMBIA AVE HARDING AVEANITA STEVERGREEN AVEMOUNT PROSPECT RDHARVEY A V E COLUMBIA A V E HARDING A V E WARRINGTON RDCUMBERLAND PKY HARVE Y A V E COLUMBIA AVE HARDING AVE WASHINGTON STOXFORD RDCOLUMBIA A V E WOODBRIDGE RDWOLFRDWIEBOLDTDRNORTH AVE ALLES STHARDING AV WI L L O W A V EVERGREEN AV OAK STHILLS AVE SHERMAN PL GROVE AVELK BLHAW T H O R N E T E R JUN I O R T E RHAWTHORNE LNSHE R W O O D R D BIG BE N D D R LYMAN AVELECHNER LN IRONWOOD DRCHURCH ST GOOD CT POTTER RDBENDER RDSAKAS DRSE E G E R S R DSEVENTHAVENO R T H W E S T H W Y HARVE Y A V EBROADWAY STGOLF RDWARRI NGTONRDDAVIS CT JOSEPHINE CTMARINA DRMORGAN O BRIEN ST COUNCIL TRL STATE ST STRATFORD RDDRAKE LNARDMORE RDFIFTHAVETHIRD AVENORTH GOLF CUL DE SAC SOUTH GOLF CUL DE SAC RA N D R D MARY STREDE KER RD EAST RIVER RDWA I K I K I D R THIRD AVEWOLF RDCORNELL AVEPRINCETON ST CAMBRIDGE RDSTONE STAM HERSTAVE CRANBROOK DRRADCLIFFE AVEVASSAR LNAMHERST AVEPINEHURST DRHARVARD ST SI M O N E D R ST R A T F O R D R D SEVENTH AVESIXTH AVEPOLYNESIAN DR LUAU DR FIFTH AVEFOURTH AVECONCORD LNTHIRD AVCONCORD CTPATRICIA LNMARCELLARDRA N D R D TIMOTHYLN WATE R F O R D CTWOLF RDWOLF RDCENTRAL RD CENTRAL RD CENTRAL RDCENTRAL RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDALBANY LNCLAYTON LNTRACY TER JON LNNO R T H W E S T H W Y MOUNT PROSPECT RDVILLAGE CTINNER CIRCLE DRWESTGATE RDGOLF RD GOLF RD GOLF RD GOLF RD ELMHURST RDSEEGERS RDFOURTH AVELANCE DR AMBLESIDE RD LEAHY CIRCLE EMILLERS RD KATHLEEN DR LITTLE PATH RDROSE AVE WESTERN AVEWE B F O R D A V E RIVER ST TOUHY AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE CLEARWATER DRWOLF RDOXFORD RDPLAINFIELD DRWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DRJARVIS AVE CHESTNUT STASH STHIGHLAND DRSPRUCE AVELEE STFRONTAGE RDMANNHEIM RD BIRCHWOOD AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE FARGO AVE WELWYN AVESIXTH AVEELIZABETH LN FOURTH AVI-294DESPLAINESRI VERRDGREGORY ST HALPINDRO 'C ONNORDR CIRCULARA V E WESLEYDRP E O N Y L N FLORALNCLARKAVEQUIGLEYDRMARYVILLEWAYMULCAHEYDRCLANCYDRMOTTIERDR KINGSLEYAVFOURTH AVEFIFTH C T VICTORIA RDOAKWOOD CT OAKWOOD CT FORESTEDGELNWILSON LNEIGHTH AVEBENNETT PLDANBURYLNRIVER DR JARVIS AVE CTHICKORY STPRATT AVE PRATT AVE JARVIS AVE GOLFRD TOUHY AVE THACKER ST I-294I-294I-294 I-90 I-90 DESPLAI NESRI VERRDCLAYTON CT OTTAWA ST EXECUTIVE WAY GERI LNGOLF RD SOUTHWESTPLHORNETERBERKSHIRELN ELL I N W O O D S T METROPOLITAN WAYMARKET ST BUC KINGH AM D RMILL ST CORA STLEAHY CIRCLE ESTARK PL LEAHY CIRCLE S MUNROE CIRCLE S KING LN DEVONSHIRE DR ELIZABETH LN PINEELMHURST RDLINCOLN LN DOREEN DRVAN BUREN AV HEATHER LNKINGSTON CTWHITCOMB AVE ILLINOIS STWOLF RDNAZARE T H W A Y COLLINS DR DORAN DRRUSTYDRMEADOW CT YALE CT YALE CT GOLF RD PENNSYLVANIAAVEFIGARD LN PROVIDENCE DR WILDFLOWER STBIRCH ST PRAIRIEAVE LYMAN AVEWARRINGTON RDEXECUTIVE WAYTIMOTHY LNBERKSHIRE LN DRAKE LN BRADLEY ST LEE STSEEGER S R D HANBURY DRHANBURY DRAMBLESIDE RDD O VE RDR WINDS O R D R S P R I N G F I E L D T E R SPRINGFIELD TER PENNSYLVANIA AVEDO V E R D R HANBURY DRROXBURY CT TURESLNUnion P a cifi c R ailr o a d Union P a cifi c R ailr o a d Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Union Pacific Railroad (Milwaukee Line)Union Pacific Railroad Union P a cifi c R ailr o a d ( Mil w a u k e e Li n e)Canadian National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e ) Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e ) Un i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e )Seegers Wye(Milwaukee Line)CanadianBLACKHAWK PARK SEMINOLE PARK WESTFIELD GARDENS CRAIG MANOR PARK TERRACE SCHOOL GARDEN PLOTS WOODLAWN PARK DES PLAINES MANOR PARK KYLEMORE GREENS EATON FIELD CHEY E N N E PARK CHEROKEE PARK ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEISURE CENTER WILLOW PARK MOHAWK PARK DIMUCCI-LOWENBERG PARK JAYCEE PARK SIOUX PARK HAWAII PARK ROSEMARY S. ARGUS FRIENDSHIP PARK SESQUICENTENNIAL PARK APACHE PARK CHIPPEWA PARK CENTRAL PARK IROQUOIS POOL CORNELL PARK MAJEWSKI METRO ATHLETIC COMPLEX MENOMINEE PARK WEST PARK TETON PARK CUMBERLAND TERRACE WINNEBAGO PARK KIWANIS PARK KUTCHEN PARK EINSTEIN PARK POTOWATOMIE PARK PAROUBECK PARK BRENTWOOD PARK NORTHSHIRE PARK TOMAHAWK PARK IROQUOIS PARK HIGH RIDGE KNOLLS PARK ARNDT PARK DEVONSHIRE PARK PRAIRIE LAKES PARK RAND PARK LAKE PARK NORTH GOLF CUL DE SAC PARK MCKAY-NEALIS PARK SOUTH GOLF CUL DE SAC PARK MYSTIC WATERS CHIPPEWA POOL YALE CT PA R K E Landmarks !1City Hall - 1420 Miner St !2Police Department - 1418 Miner St !3Fire Station 1 - 405 S Des Plaines River Rd !4Fire Station 2 - 1313 E Oakton St !5Fire Station 3 - 130 Thacker St !6Library - 1501 Ellinwood St !7Public Works - 1111 Joseph Schwab Rd !8Downtown Train Station - 1501 Miner St !9Cumberland Train Station - 475 Northwest Hwy !10Post Office - 1000 E Oakton St !11Post Office Annex - 684 Lee St !21Prairie Lakes Center - 515 Thacker St !31Rivers Casino - 3000 S Des Plaines River Rd !14Des Plaines Senior Center - 52 Northwest Hwy !15Des Plaines Historical Society - 781 Pearson St 1:14,073 03,250 6,500 Feet Date of last map update: April 11, 2022 Check out www.desplaines.org/explore-our-city/city-map-gallery to view the most up to date zoning information with the interactive city map. Zoning District LegendMinimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Size 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU 10,000 Sq. Ft (Minimum) 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU (Interior)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Corner) 6,875 Sq. Ft. (Interior)8,125 Sq. Ft. (Corner) Commercial Neighborhood ShoppingC-1 Limited Office CommercialC-2 General CommercialC-3 Regional ShoppingC-4 Central BusinessC-5 Casino DistrictC-6 C-7 High Density Campus Commercial Institutional InstitutionalI-1 Other Planned Unit Development^ Manufacturing Special ManufacturingM-3 General ManufacturingM-2 Limited ManufacturingM-1 Single Family Residential Single Family ResidentialR-1 Multi Family Residential R-3 Mobile HomeM-H Townhouse Residential Central Core ResidentialR-4 Two Family ResidentialR-2 O'Hare International Airport Village of Mount Prospect Village of Rosemont City of Chicago Village of Rosemont City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County City of Park Ridge Unincorporated Cook County Village of Mount Prospect Unincorporated Cook County Unincorporated Cook County Village of Mount Prospect Elk Grove Village !5 !2 !1 !6!8 !7 !4 !9 !11 !10 !3 !21 !31 !14 !15 ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Axehead Lake Shagbark Lake Big Bend Lake Lake Maryanne University Lake Lake BelleauDesPlainesRiver DesPl ainesRi verDesPlainesRiverDesPlain e s R iverDesPl ai ne s Ri v e r WellersCreek WellersCree k WellersCreekWel l ers C re e k Willow CreekHigginsCreekHigginsCreek Will owCr eekLake OpekaHigginsCreek Farm e r 's C ree kFarmer's CreekPeterson Lake Prairie Creek WillowCreekWellers Creek 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1300 E 1400 E 1500 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 3200 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W 2400 E 2600 E2500 S 2600 S 2200 E2500 S 2500 E 500 W 2100 E2600 S 2300 E2100 S 2600 S 00 600 E 700 E 900 E 800 E 200 E 300 E 400 E 500 E 100 E800 S 200 S 300 S 600 S 400 S 500 S 700 S 900 S 1900 E 1800 E 1700 E 1600 E 1200 E 1100 E 1000 E 1400 E 2000 E1800 S 1700 S 1000 S 100 W100 S 1100 S 1200 S 1300 S 1400 S 2000 S 1900 S 1600 S 1500 S 2400 S 2300 S 200 N 300 W 400 W100 N 2100 S 2200 S 200 W700 N 600 N 300 N 500 N 400 N 800 W 500 W 600 W 700 W 2200 E 2100 E800 N 2300 E2500 S 2400 E900 N 3000 S 2900 S 2800 S 2500 E2600 S 3100 S 2700 S 1000 N 2600 E1100 N 1200 N 900 W1300 N 1400 N 1500 N 1000 W 1100 W2600 S 2400 E2500 S 2100 S 2200 E 1300 E 1500 E3200 2600 E2600 S 2500 E2600 S 2100 E 500 W 2300 E2500 S MIDDLETON CTC A S T L E RE A L N D U RSEY LN KYL EMORE CTCALLENLNMIDDLETONLN WATERFORDDR KE N M A R E D RLISMOREDR WOLFRDL O N GFOR DDRWEXFORDCTCT MADELYN DR WIS CONSINDR KATHLEEN DR MADELYN DRMEADOWDRI-294I-294SECOND AVESIXTHAVEM EYERCT FLETCHERDR NORTHWEST HWY UNIVERSITY ST BELLAIRECT WILKINSDRMARSHALLDRMICHAEL CTSHANNONCT DARAJAMESRDORCHARDCTARLINGTONAVELAURELAVEI-294 PARSONSA VECRESTW O O DDRSHAWNLNWALNUTAVE ANDERSONTEREEASTVILLADRNORTHEAS T PLNORTHWEST PLSOUTHEAS TPLAPPLECREEKLNC RABTR EEL N BUSSEHWYKINKAIDCT KROWKA DRANDERSONTERSANDERSONTERE WAYNEDR DENN IS P L CARO L LN SHAGBARKDRCORASTWINDSORDR JEFFERYLN LANCASTERLNDAYTONPL I-90 CEDA R CT I-90 I-90 MAPLESTI-294LEESTPETERRDGREENLEAF AVE PAULAL N N I M IT ZDR H A LS EYDR C R A IG DRCARLOW DRKENMAR E CT BENDING CENTRAL RD BERKSHIRE CT C IR C LE DRCOLLEGEDR(O.C.C .D R )DRAKELN C UMBERL ANDPKYYALE CT DESPLAI NESRIVERRDGOLF RD MIN E R S T BROWN ST DES PLAINES RIVER RD WOODLAND AVE RAN D R D EMERSON ST SUFFIELD ST DAWN CTJOSEPHSCHW ABRD/CAMPGROUNDRD RIVER DRBERRY LNWESTVILLADROAKWOODAVE SOUTH PARK AVE WASHINGTON ST EISENHOWER DRNORTH PARK AV E TOUHY AVE STOCKTON AVE HOLIDAY LN MUR RAYLNHORNETERDEMPSTER ST PRAIRIE A V E WESTMERERDLAWNLNBRENTWOODDR RA N D R D RA N D R D RA N D R D MARK AVE THERESE TER TIMOTHY LNYORKSHIRE LN REGENCY DRBERKSHIRE LNNELSON LNDEVON AVESTILLWELL DRSUNS E T D RSCOTT STSOUTH LNPATTON DRHIGGI N S R DMANNHEIM RDORCHARD PLSYCAMORE STCENTRAL AVE NIMITZ DR NORTHSHORE AVECURTIS STI -294RUSTY DRPEARLE DRJOSEPH AVEDAVID DR FOX LNSCOTT STALDEN LNMORSE AV MAPLE STMORSE AVE ANDY LNFARWELL AVE I-90WOLF RDSANTA ROSA DRMOUNTPROSPECTRDTOUHY AVE I-90 I-90 GRECO AVE LUNT AVE ESTES AVEDALE STGREENLEAF AVE ESTES AVE EISENHOWERDRIRIS LNRUSTYDRESTES AV LAURA LN PARKWOOD LNCRAIG DRTOUHY AVEROBERTCOOMBS CTTOUHY CT CHASE AVE MAGNOLIA STSCOTT STCEDAR STJARVIS AV SHERWIN AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCH STSHERWIN AVE FARGO AVE PINE STWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DREASTVIEW DRJARLATH AVELMIRA AVEDOUGLAS AVESPRUCEWOOD AVEI-90ELMHURST RDI-90WILLE RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDHOWARD AVE BRADROCK DR HOWARD AVE T U R E S L N NEBEL LN PLAINFIELD DRDEXTER LNIRWIN AVE HOWARD AVE EVERETT LN PROSPECT LN KOEHLER DRSTOCKTON AVE SHEPHERD DRPROSPECT AVE PINE STHOWARD AVECIRCLESTDEANE ST HOWARD AVE MAPLE STPROSPECT AVE CEDAR STBIRCH STDESPLAI NESRI VERRDLOCUST STKENNICOTT CT LOCUST ST EVERETT AVE SYCAMORE STORCHARD STLINDEN STWHITE STRIVERVIEW AVEELM STCHESTNUT STBITTERSWEET CT BRIAR CT MANN HEIM RD EVERETT AVELEE STHAZEL CT SPRUCE AVEASH STOAKTON PLEVERETT AVEWEBSTER LNOAKTON ST WINTHROP DROAKTON ST MARSHALL DRWILLE RD DOVER LNPLEASANT LN SHORT TEROAKTON STSUSAN DRJOYCE DRCOURTESY LN DOVER DR CORDIAL DR RIDGE LNMARSHALL DRMIAMI LNDENVERDR DOVERDR RAWLS RD OXFORD RDWEDGEWOOD AVLINCOLN AVE CINDY LNLINCOLN AVE OAKTON ST FA IR MONT CT LINCOLN AVE MARGRET STSECOND AVEWICKE AVE OAKTON STTIMES DRFOREST AVE OAKTON ST SANBOR N S T KYLEMORE DR LINCOLN AVE WICKE AVE O A K T O N S TMAPLE STSTEWART A V E DES PLA INES R IVER RD FOREST AVEWHITE STVAN BUREN AVE CENTER STCORA STDEANE STLEE STJEANNETTE STOLIVIA AVE VAN BUREN AVE SECOND AVEEARL AVETHIRD AVWEBSTER LNFOREST AVEFIFTH AVESIXTH AVEFOREST AVE WOLF RDALGONQUIN RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDWESTFIELD LN ROXBURY LN DIAMOND HEAD DR PHOENIXDRALGONQUIN RD KOLPIN DRANDREA LNALGONQUIN RD JILL CTCOLONIAL LNMORRAY CT LESLIE LNELMHURSTRDBEAU DRARNOLD CTWILLSONDRSEYMOUR AVEARNOLD CTWILLSON DRPERDA LNMARSHALL DREAKER PL DOROTHY DRHEWITT DRKINKAID CT FLORIAN DR MC CAIN C T WALNUT AVE WOLF RDALGONQUIN RD WEST GRANT DRHOFFMAN PKY WALNUT CT WALNUT CTTHIRD AVEWEBSTER LNSECOND AVEWALNUT AVEEAST GRANT DRJEANNETTE STMARGRET STALGONQUIN RD LEE STCAMPBELL AVE HENRY AVE WALNUT AVE OAKWOOD AVE ALGONQUIN RD ALGONQUIN RD RANDRD PARKVIEW LNACRES LNBU S S E H W Y MASON LNTHACKER ST WHITE STASHLAND AVE CENTER STOAKWOOD AVE ALFINI DRASHLAND AVE OAKWOOD AVE WESTGATE RDMOUNT PROSPECT RDSPRUANCE PLINGRAM PLDEMPSTER ST CLARK LNKING LN BEAU CT MILLERS RD KATHLEEN DR CAVAN LNELMHURST RDBEAU DRAMBLESIDE RDMARSHALLDRLANCE DRMANOR CTCITADEL CTTERRACE LN MILLERS RD WARRINGTON RDKENILWORTH CTWOLF RD GREE N VI E W A V E SIXTH AVPRAIRIE AVE WALTER AVETHIRD AVTHACKER ST SECOND AVEROSE AVE FIRST AVELAUREL AVEGRACELAND AVEMA R I O N S T TH A C K E R S T LEE STCENTER STPEARSON STMIN E R S T RANDRD GARLAND PLMINER ST LYMAN AVESEMINARY AVE DEMPSTER ST PRAIRIE AVE POTTER RDBALLARD RDLYMAN AVERITA RDEDWARD CTGOOD AVEBELLAIRE AVEBALLARD RD TRAILSIDE LNBENDER RDWOODS RD ELK BLLEE STJEFFERSON STGRACELAND AVELAUREL AVEPERRY ST JEFFERSON ST PERRY ST BROWN ST WASHINGTON ST IDA STWEBFORDAVE GREENVIEW AVEFIRST AVEHOLLYWOOD AVE WOODLAWN AVE FIFTH AVEIN N O V A T IO N D R BRADLEY ST WASHINGTON ST LASALLE STBEDFORD LNWESTGATE RDANITA STFREMONT AVEFREMONT CT WESTMERE RD GALLEON WAYBRADLEY ST DULLESRD BRADLEY CTFARTHING LNDULLESRD DEBRA DR EASY STBELL DRWESTMERE RD DEBRA DR SANDY LNLILLIAN LNDULLES RDBEAU DRJON CTBENNETT LNNORMANCT MICHAELRD LYNN CTRADCLIFFE AVEHARVEY AVE COLUMBIA AVE HARDING AVEANITA STEVERGREEN AVEMOUNT PROSPECT RDHARVEY A V E COLUMBIA A V E HARDING A V E WARRINGTON RDCUMBERLAND PKY HARVE Y A V E COLUMBIA AVE HARDING AVE WASHINGTON STOXFORD RDCOLUMBIA A V E WOODBRIDGE RDWOLFRDWIEBOLDTDRNORTH AVE ALLES STHARDING AV WI L L O W A V EVERGREEN AV OAK STHILLS AVE SHERMAN PL GROVE AVELK BLHAW T H O R N E T E R JUNI O R T E RHAWTHORNE LNSHE R W O O D R D BIG BE N D D R LYMAN AVELECHNER LN IRONWOOD DRCHURCH ST GOOD CT POTTER RDBENDER RDSAKAS DRSE E G E R S R DSEVENTHAVENO R T H W E S T H W Y HARVE Y A V EBROADWAY STGOLF RDWARRI NGTONRDDAVIS CT JOSEPHINE CTMARINA DRMORGAN O BRIEN ST COUNCIL TRL STATE ST STRATFORD RDDRAKE LNARDMORE RDFIFTHAVETHIRD AVENORTH GOLF CUL DE SAC SOUTH GOLF CUL DE SAC RA N D R D MARY STRE DE KE R RD EAST RIVER RDWA I K I K I D R THIRD AVEWOLF RDCORNELL AVEPRINCETON ST CAMBRIDGE RDSTONE STAM HERSTAVE CRANBROOK DRRADCLIFFE AVEVASSAR LNAMHERST AVEPINEHURST DRHARVARD ST SI M O N E D R ST R A T F O R D R D SEVENTH AVESIXTH AVEPOLYNESIAN DR LUAU DR FIFTH AVEFOURTH AVECONCORD LNTHIRD AVCONCORD CTPATRICIA LNMARCELLARDRA N D R D TIMOTHYLN WATE R F O R D CTWOLF RDWOLF RDCENTRAL RD CENTRAL RD CENTRAL RDCENTRAL RD MOUNT PROSPECT RDALBANY LNCLAYTON LNTRACY TER JON LNNO R T H W E S T H W Y MOUNT PROSPECT RDVILLAGE CTINNER CIRCLE DRWESTGATE RDGOLF RD GOLF RD GOLF RD GOLF RD ELMHURST RDSEEGERS RDFOURTH AVELANCE DR AMBLESIDE RDLEAHY CIRCLE EMILLERS RD KATHLEEN DRLITTLE PATH RDROSE AVE WESTERN AVEWE B F O R D A V E RIVER ST TOUHY AVE TOUHY AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE CLEARWATER DRWOLF RDOXFORD RDPLAINFIELD DRWEBSTER LNWESTVIEW DRJARVIS AVE CHESTNUT STASH STHIGHLAND DRSPRUCE AVELEE STFRONTAGE RDMANNHEIM RD BIRCHWOOD AVE BIRCHWOOD AVE FARGO AVE WELWYN AVESIXTH AVEELIZABETH LN FOURTH AVI-294DESPLAI NESRIVERRDGREGORY ST HALPINDRO 'C ONNORDR CIRCULARA V E WESLEYDRP E O N Y L N FLORALNCLARKAVEQUIGLEYDRMARYVILLEWAYMULCAHEYDRCLANCYDRMOTTIERDR KINGSLEYAVFOURTH AVEFIFTH C T VICTORIA RDOAKWOOD CT OAKWOOD CT FORESTEDGELNWILSON LNEIGHTH AVEBENNETT PLDANBURYLNRIVER DR JARVIS AVE CTHICKORY STPRATT AVE PRATT AVE JARVIS AVE GOLFRD TOUHY AVE THACKER ST I-294I-294I-294I-90 I-90 DESPLAI NESRI VERRDCLAYTON CT OTTAWA ST EXECUTIVE WAY GERI LNGOLF RD SOUTHWESTPLHORNETERBERKSHIRELN ELL I N W O O D S T METROPOLITAN WAYMARKET ST BUC KINGH AM D RMILL ST CORA STLEAHY CIRCLE ESTARK PLLEAHY CIRCLE S MUNROECIRCLES KING LN DEVONSHIRE DR ELIZABETH LN PINEELMHURST RDLINCOLN LNDOREEN DRVAN BUREN AV HEATHER LNKINGSTON CTWHITCOMB AVE ILLINOIS STWOLF RDNAZARE T H W A Y COLLINS DR DORAN DRRUST YDRMEADOW CT YALE CT YALE CT GOLF RD PENNSYLVANIAAVEFIGARD LN PROVIDENCE DR WILDFLOWER STBIRCH ST PRAIRIEAVE LYMAN AVEWARRINGTON RDEXECUTIVE WAYTIMOTHY LNBERKSHIRE LN DRAKE LN BRADLEY ST LEE STSEEGER S R D HANBURY DRHANBURY DRAMBLESIDE RDDOVERDR WINDS O R D R SPRINGFIELDTER SPRINGFIELD TERPENNSYLVANIA AVEDOVERDR HANBURY DRROXBURY CT TURESLNUnion P a cifi c R ailr o a d Union P a cifi c R ailr o a d Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Union Pacific Railroad (Milwaukee Line)Union Pacific Railroad Union P a cifi c R ailr o a d ( Mil w a u k e e Li n e)Canadian National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)National Railroad (Wisconsin Central)Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e ) Uni o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e ) Un i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d ( N W L i n e )Seegers Wye(Milwaukee Line)CanadianBLACKHAWK PARK SEMINOLE PARK WESTFIELD GARDENS CRAIG MANOR PARK TERRACE SCHOOL GARDEN PLOTS WOODLAWN PARK DES PLAINES MANOR PARK KYLEMORE GREENS EATON FIELD CHEY E N N E PARK CHEROKEE PARK ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEISURE CENTER WILLOW PARK MOHAWK PARK DIMUCCI-LOWENBERG PARK JAYCEE PARK SIOUX PARK HAWAII PARK ROSEMARY S. ARGUS FRIENDSHIP PARK SESQUICENTENNIAL PARK APACHE PARK CHIPPEWA PARK CENTRAL PARK IROQUOIS POOL CORNELL PARK MAJEWSKI METRO ATHLETIC COMPLEX MENOMINEE PARK WEST PARK TETON PARK CUMBERLAND TERRACE WINNEBAGO PARK KIWANIS PARK KUTCHEN PARK EINSTEIN PARK POTOWATOMIE PARK PAROUBECK PARK BRENTWOOD PARK NORTHSHIRE PARK TOMAHAWK PARK IROQUOIS PARK HIGH RIDGE KNOLLS PARK ARNDT PARK DEVONSHIRE PARK PRAIRIE LAKES PARK RAND PARK LAKE PARK NORTH GOLF CUL DE SAC PARK MCKAY-NEALIS PARK SOUTH GOLF CUL DE SAC PARK MYSTIC WATERS CHIPPEWA POOL YALE CT PA R K E Landmarks !1City Hall - 1420 Miner St !2Police Department - 1418 Miner St !3Fire Station 1 - 405 S Des Plaines River Rd !4Fire Station 2 - 1313 E Oakton St !5Fire Station 3 - 130 Thacker St !6Library - 1501 Ellinwood St !7Public Works - 1111 Joseph Schwab Rd !8Downtown Train Station - 1501 Miner St !9Cumberland Train Station - 475 Northwest Hwy !10Post Office - 1000 E Oakton St !11Post Office Annex - 684 Lee St !21Prairie Lakes Center - 515 Thacker St !31Rivers Casino - 3000 S Des Plaines River Rd !14Des Plaines Senior Center - 52 Northwest Hwy !15Des Plaines Historical Society - 781 Pearson St 1:14,073 03,2506,500 Feet Date of last map update: April 11, 2022 Check out www.desplaines.org/explore-our-city/city-map-gallery to view the most up to date zoning information with the interactive city map. Zoning District Legend Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Size 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU 10,000 Sq. Ft (Minimum) 2,800 Sq. Ft. per DU (Interior)6,875 Sq. Ft. (Corner) 6,875 Sq. Ft. (Interior)8,125 Sq. Ft. (Corner) Commercial Neighborhood ShoppingC-1 Limited Office CommercialC-2 General CommercialC-3 Regional ShoppingC-4 Central BusinessC-5 Casino DistrictC-6 C-7 High Density Campus Commercial Institutional InstitutionalI-1 Other Planned Unit Development^ Manufacturing Special ManufacturingM-3 General ManufacturingM-2 Limited ManufacturingM-1 Single Family Residential Single Family ResidentialR-1 Multi Family Residential R-3 Mobile HomeM-H Townhouse Residential Central Core ResidentialR-4 Two Family ResidentialR-2 SITE SITE M-2 M-1R-1 R-1 R-1 R-4 R-4 C-3 C-5 PROJECT SITE Attachment 7 Page 21 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 3 Ground Level Plans Level 1 Plan Levels 2-4 Plan Attachment 7 Page 22 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 4 Aerial View Existing 5-Story Buildings Existing 6-Story Building Existing 5-Story Building Proposed 4-Story Building Gr a c e l a n d A v e . Gr a c e l a n d A v e . Oakwood Ave.Oakwood Ave. Existing 5-Story Building Existing 7-Story Building Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Existing 3-Story Buildings Existing 2-Story Buildings Existing 1-Story Building Attachment 7 Page 23 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 5 Site B - Eye Level View along Graceland Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Attachment 7 Page 24 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 6 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 50’-0” SOUTHEAST ELEVATION Proposed Building Elevations - Site B NORTHEAST ELEVATIONSOUTHWEST ELEVATION FIBER CEMENT FACE BRICK FACE BRICK 50’-0” 50’-0”50’-0” Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Graceland Ave.Oakwood Ave.Attachment 7 Page 25 of 132 Des Plaines, Illinois | July 18, 2023 Graceland and Oakwood Luz and Associates #1 LLC 7 Materials2 Cast StoneFace Brick Face Brick12 3 4Face Brick 66 Frosted Glass5 54 Fiber Cement6 31 48’-0” 50’-0” Attachment 7 Page 26 of 132 EVEVProfessional Design FirmLicense No. 184-003220Expires: 04/30/2025145 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE AGRAYSLAKE, ILLINOIS 60030phone (847) 223-4804fax (847) 223-4864email INFO@EEA-LTD.COMASSOCIATES, LTD.ENGINEERINGERIKSSONLANDSCAPE NOTES:® ® PLANT SCHEDULE SITE BAttachment 8Page 27 of 132 Attachment 8Page 28 of 132 Professional Design FirmLicense No. 184-003220Expires: 04/30/2025145 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE AGRAYSLAKE, ILLINOIS 60030phone (847) 223-4804fax (847) 223-4864email INFO@EEA-LTD.COMASSOCIATES, LTD.ENGINEERINGERIKSSONTREE PLANTING DETAIL1EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL2SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL3ANNUAL, PERENNIAL, & GROUNDCOVER DETAIL4Attachment 8Page 29 of 132 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDGEOMETRY NOTESAttachment 9Page 30 of 132 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDUTILITY NOTESSTRUCTURE NOTESAttachment 9Page 31 of 132 GENERAL NOTESLEGENDPAVING & SURFACE LEGENDGRADING NOTESAttachment 9Page 32 of 132 Scale:Drawn By:# Date CommentsRevisionsChecked By:Date:7/18/2023Page M of 1SITE BP5P3P3P1P1P1S7S7S7S7S7S7S7S7S7S7S7S3S3S7S3P4P4P6P21.2 1.5 1.6 1.21.2 2.0 2.9 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.3 1.7 1.2 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.3 2.3 1.6 1.4 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.7 2.4 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.0 1.4 1.13.2 4.6 5.8 5.72.5 3.5 4.2 4.5 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.1 3.4 2.6 2.7 3.5 4.2 4.7 5.1 5.4 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.1 3.4 3.34.2 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 3.9 3.4 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.4 2.7 2.13.8 5.1 6.3 6.4 5.5 6.9 2.22.7 3.7 4.6 5.7 6.6 6.9 6.1 5.2 4.4 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.8 4.5 5.3 6.4 7.1 6.8 5.9 5.1 4.5 3.8 3.74.3 4.9 5.7 6.3 6.1 5.3 4.7 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.4 4.8 5.6 6.1 5.8 4.9 4.1 3.5 2.9 2.43.7 4.8 5.8 6.3 6.3 6.1 1.83.1 4.1 4.5 5.2 5.9 6.0 5.6 5.1 4.9 4.3 3.5 3.6 4.4 4.9 5.3 5.7 6.1 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.0 4.4 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.8 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.1 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.3 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.8 3.7 4.7 5.6 6.2 6.7 6.0 1.93.0 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.5 4.1 4.1 4.5 4.8 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.8 3.4 4.3 5.0 5.5 5.5 4.5 1.62.3 2.7 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.1 4.8 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.5 4.3 4.8 4.5 3.4 1.61.5 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 4.1 4.6 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.3 4.9 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.9 4.6 3.6 2.11.0 1.3 1.5 1.02.2 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.0 4.1 4.1 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.03.5 3.9 4.5 5.05.5 5.3 4.8 4.3 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.5 3.0 4.0 4.6 4.5 3.7 2.81.11.9 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.9 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.63.1 3.6 4.2 4.25.3 5.2 4.7 4.2 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.02.2 2.8 3.8 4.4 4.6 3.8 3.21.6 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.12.7 3.2 3.7 4.15.1 5.0 4.5 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.02.1 2.7 3.8 4.4 5.0 4.1 3.02.0 2.3 2.7 3.6 4.11.7 1.9 2.6 3.7 4.3 5.2 4.1 3.01.4 1.6 2.1 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.5 4.1 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.5 3.5 4.0 4.5 3.7 2.91.5 1.9 2.5 2.9 3.1 4.0 4.6 4.9 5.3 5.9 6.0 5.4 4.7 4.2 3.5 2.3 1.6 1.5 1.7 2.3 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.81.3 1.6 1.9 2.4 3.3 4.3 5.0 6.0 6.9 6.9 6.0 4.9 4.0 3.1 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.01.2 1.6 2.2 3.2 4.4 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.6 4.4 3.9 2.9 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.6 2.3 2.2 1.20.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.3 0.40.2 0.3 0.4 0.60.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.30.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.50.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.40.4 0.5 0.8 1.00.4 0.6 0.7 0.90.4 0.5 0.60.3 0.3 0.4 0.60.2 0.3 0.4 0.50.2 0.2 0.3 0.40.1 0.2 0.2 0.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.20.1 0.1 0.2 0.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.20.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.01.10.70.70.7 0.31.1 0.4 0.2 0.10.2 0.2 0.3 1.30.1 0.3 1.5 1.80.2 0.4 0.9 2.70.10.20.4 1.1 0.70.20.2 0.3 0.4 0.90.80.1 0.3 1.4 2.40.80.3 0.71.41.70.20.6 1.5 3.2 4.10.10.8 1.8 2.8 1.20.00.8 1.2 0.8 0.20.00.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.01.0 1.3 1.7 2.7 3.7 3.1 2.0 1.7 1.50.6 1.0 1.6 0.2 1.8 1.1 0.80.7 1.1 0.8 1.3 0.91.0 3.4 1.42.70.9 1.8 2.4 1.90.51.1 1.12.7 4.31.1 1.21.00.8 1.2 2.0 3.5 4.9 5.7 5.3 4.9 4.3 3.3 2.1 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.0 1.7 1.5 0.53.7 3.0 2.2 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.2 1.6 0.90.50.30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.0 1.9 2.4 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.3 3.2 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.1 3.9 3.5 2.7 2.0 1.4 1.2 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.7 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.3 3.9 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.4 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.4 2.1 3.1 4.3 5.6 6.4 5.5 4.8 5.8 4.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.8 3.8 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.4 3.6 2.8 2.4 2.6 3.4 4.2 4.7 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.1 4.9 4.9 4.5 3.8 3.1 3.1 3.5 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 3.7 3.2 3.0 3.3 3.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 3.4 2.7 2.1 1.8 2.0 2.7 3.7 4.8 6.1 6.9 6.3 5.8 7.2 4.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.9 3.9 4.7 5.6 6.6 7.3 7.0 6.2 5.3 4.6 3.9 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.7 4.4 5.1 6.0 6.9 7.5 7.1 6.3 5.4 4.8 4.2 3.5 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.8 6.4 6.2 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.9 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.7 6.2 6.2 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.5 3.0 2.4 2.0 2.2 2.8 3.7 4.6 5.7 6.5 6.6 6.3 6.7 3.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.1 3.3 4.1 4.7 5.4 6.2 6.7 6.6 6.0 5.3 4.8 4.3 3.4 3.0 3.3 4.1 4.7 5.2 5.8 6.5 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.4 5.1 4.7 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.6 5.2 5.8 6.3 6.2 5.7 5.1 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.9 5.5 5.9 5.8 5.3 4.6 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.8 3.6 4.5 5.5 6.2 6.6 6.9 6.4 3.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.4 3.5 4.3 4.7 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.1 4.7 4.0 3.5 3.8 4.5 5.0 5.4 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.9 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.1 4.8 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.5 4.0 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.4 5.2 5.9 6.3 6.6 5.7 2.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.00.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.7 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.2 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.3 5.0 4.0 2.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.00.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.9 4.5 4.8 4.4 3.4 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.8 5.1 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.7 4.5 5.0 4.6 3.7 2.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.8 5.3 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.1 4.6 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.5 4.4 4.7 4.5 3.8 3.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.4 3.7 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.0 4.5 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.4 4.3 4.6 4.5 3.9 3.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.8 3.3 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.2 4.8 4.4 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.3 4.2 4.6 4.8 4.2 3.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.6 3.9 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.9 4.4 5.1 5.3 5.2 4.6 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.3 4.1 4.8 5.2 4.4 3.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.2 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.4 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.0 4.0 4.9 5.1 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.3 3.2 4.1 4.8 5.3 4.5 3.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.4 3.4 0.0 3.5 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.4 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.6 4.1 4.5 4.7 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.5 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.1 3.8 4.4 4.8 4.1 3.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.9 0.2 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.91.2 1.8 2.5 2.5 1.5 0.4 0.41.0 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.3 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.7 4.4 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.2 4.9 4.5 3.8 2.7 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.6 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 0.3 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.72.9 4.2 3.81.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 3.1 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.9 6.5 6.9 6.5 5.6 4.9 4.2 3.5 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 0.9 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.75.41.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.7 3.8 4.6 5.3 6.1 7.0 7.5 6.8 5.8 4.9 4.1 3.2 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.6 3.2 1.6 0.8 0.60.9 1.0 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.8 4.7 5.3 5.2 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.0 3.1 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.6 3.1 2.1 0.8 0.4 0.00.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.1 3.1 4.0 4.7 5.0 4.8 4.4 3.9 3.3 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 2.0 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.00.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.6 2.6 3.3 3.3 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.01.4 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.1 0.00.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 2.3 0.00.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 0.00.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 2.4 0.00.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.00.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.01.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.01.3 0.3 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.2 0.00.8 0.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.6 0.00.3 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.1 3.6 0.00.1 0.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 3.1 4.3 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.5 2.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.9 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.9 1.8 1.0 1.7 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.9 1.8 1.1 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Luminaire ScheduleSymbolLabelArrangementDescriptionPS-0506L30D SCONCESINGLEOW0146-12-930-BKPX1-LED SCONCESINGLEWPX1 LED P1 40K MvoltDSX0 LED P6 40K 70CRI BLC3SINGLEDSX0 LED P6 40K 70CRI BLC3Calculation SummaryLabelUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinBACK OF BUILDINGFc0.584.10.0N.A.N.A.BUILFING FRONTFc1.885.70.36.2719.00ENTIRE SITEFc1.34PM-646-30K POST MOUNTSINGLEPM-W48620DSX0 LED P6 40K 70CRI BLC4SINGLEDSX0 LED P6 40K 70CRI BLC4DSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI T3MSINGLEDSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI T3MDSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI LCCOSINGLEDSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI LCCODSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI BLC3SINGLEDSX0 LED P5 40K 70CRI BLC37.50.0N.A.N.A.GRASS ISLANDFc1.563.70.27.8018.50PARKING LOTFc3.657.11.03.657.10PROPERTY LINE EASTFc0.040.20.0N.A.N.A.PROPERTY LINE NORTHFc0.010.10.0N.A.N.A.PROPERTY LINE SOUTHFc0.211.50.0N.A.N.A.PROPERTY LINE WESTFc0.020.10.0N.A.N.A.1.2.3.4.Notes:Calculation Results Taken At GradePole Height : 18'Calculation Point Spacing : 6' x 6'Entire Site Calculation take at 6" above gradeAll perimeter fixtures shall be a min 3’-0” away from the property line5.6.Fixture type P2 mounting height 10'This document contains confidential and proprietary information of Paramont-EO INC. This document may only be used by or for the benefit of Paramont-EO and customers. Field verification is recommended when calculations are based on end‐user or customer‐provided information. End user environment and application (including, but not limited to, voltage variation and dirt accumulation) can cause actual field performance to differ from the calculated photometric performance represented in this lighting layout. In no event will Paramont-EO be responsible for any loss resulting from any use of this drawing.Attachment 10Page 33 of 132 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Prepared For: Luz and Associates #1 LLC June 15, 2023 SITE Attachment 11 Page 34 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 1.Introduction This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed residential development to be located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue in Des Plaines, Illinois. The site which is currently utilized as the parking lot for Contour Saws Inc., will be redeveloped to provide 56 apartment units and 64 parking spaces with access off Oakwood Avenue and the existing alley to the east of the site. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: •Existing roadway conditions •A description of the proposed development •Directional distribution of the development traffic •Vehicle trip generation for the development •Future traffic conditions including access to the development •Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours •Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system •Evaluation of the adequacy of the parking supply Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1.Existing Conditions - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2.Projected Conditions – Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the traffic volumes that include the existing traffic volumes increased by an ambient growth factor and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. Attachment 11 Page 35 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Site Location Figure 1 SITE Attachment 11Page 36 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Aerial View of Site Figure 2 SITE Attachment 11Page 37 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 2.Existing Conditions The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The site, which is currently utilized as the parking lot for Contour Saws Inc., is bounded by Graceland Avenue to the west, an alley to the east, Oakwood Avenue to the south, and Graceland Manor apartments to the north. Land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily residential with commercial land uses along Lee Road. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the proposed development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. Thacker Street is generally an east-west major collector roadway that provides one travel lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Lee Road, Thacker Street provides a shared left-turn/through lane on the eastbound approach and a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach. High visibility crosswalks are provided on the east, north, and south legs of this intersection and a standard style crosswalk is provided on the west leg. Pedestrian signals are provided on all four legs of this intersection. At its signalized intersection with Graceland Avenue, Thacker Road provides a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left-turn/through lane on the westbound approach. High visibility crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided on all four legs of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersections with Jeannette Street, First Avenue, Laurel Avenue, and the two alleys, Thacker Street does not provide any exclusive turn lanes. Thacker Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines, carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of approximately 8,900 vehicles (IDOT 2022), and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Attachment 11 Page 38 of 132 SITE SITE 9A-6P 3 HR M-F 9A-6P 3 HR M-F 10A-6P 3 HR 10A-6P3 HR ONE-WAY1245 ONE-WAYP Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 3Job No: 23-102 NNOT TO SCALE STREETJEANNETTESTREETDEMPSTERTHACKER/AVENUEFIRST AVENUELAURELAVENUEGRACELANDP2525252510 P 3 0 2530 ROADLEE/MANNHEIMP 2030 25AVENUE OAKWOOD AVENUE OAKWOOD ALLEYWESTALLEYEASTEXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTIS DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL A STREET @ FIRST AVENUETHACKER/DEMPSTERA P P P P P - TRAVEL LANE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - BUS STOP - STOP SIGN - NO PARKING - ON-STREET PARKING - SPEED LIMIT P XX P LEGEND - HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - STANDARD CROSSWALK - RAILROAD CROSSING - NO LEFT TURN - NO RIGHT TURN - SHARROWAttachment 11Page 39 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Graceland Avenue (U.S. 45) is a northeast-southwest, other principal arterial roadway that is one way in the southbound direction in the vicinity of the site providing two travel lanes. At its signalized intersection with Thacker Street, Graceland Avenue provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. At its unsignalized north intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Graceland Avenue provides a through lane and a shared left-turn/through lane on the southbound approach. At its unsignalized south intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Graceland Avenue provides a through lane and a shared through/right turn lane on the southbound approach. Graceland Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an AADT volume of approximately 17,000 vehicles (IDOT 2021), is not classified as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), and has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Lee Road is a northeast-southwest, other principal arterial roadway that is one way in the northbound direction in the vicinity of the site providing two travel lanes. At its signalized intersection with Thacker Street, Lee Road provides a shared left-turn/through lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with Oakwood Avenue, Lee Road provides a shared left-turn/through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. Lee Road is under the jurisdiction of IDOT, carries an AADT volume of 5,600 vehicles (IDOT 2021), is not classified as an SRA, and has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Oakwood Avenue is an east-west, local roadway that extends from 3rd Avenue to its terminus at River Road providing one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized north “T” intersection with Graceland Avenue, Oakwood Avenue provides a left-turn lane on the westbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the east leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized south “T” intersection with Graceland Avenue, Oakwood Avenue provides a right-turn lane on the eastbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the west leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersections with the alley and Lee Street, Oakwood Avenue provides a shared left-turn/through lane on the eastbound approach and a shared through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. Standard style crosswalks are provided on the east and west legs of the intersection of Oakwood Avenue with Lee Road. Oakwood Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Jeannette Street is a north-south local roadway that serves residential houses in the vicinity of the site. Jeannette Street extends south from Thacker Road to its terminus at Algonquin Road providing one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, Jeannette Street provides a shared left-turn/right-turn lane on the northbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. Jeannette Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. First Avenue is a north-south local roadway that provides one travel lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, First Avenue provides a shared left-turn/right- turn lane on the southbound approach. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the north leg of this intersection. First Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Attachment 11 Page 40 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Laurel Avenue is a north-south local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Thacker Street, Laurel Avenue provides a shared left-turn/right- turn lane on the southbound approach. Laurel Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. The east alley is a north-south local roadway that provides one lane in each direction. At its unsignalized intersection with Thacker Street, the alley provides a shared left-turn/through/right- turn lane on both approaches. At its unsignalized “T” intersection with Oakwood Avenue, the alley provides a shared left-turn/right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions within the study area, KLOA. Inc conducted traffic counts using Miovision Video Scout Collection Units on Tuesday, April 11, 2023 and on Thursday, April 27, 2023 during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods at the following intersections: •Thacker Street with Lee Road •Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue •Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue •Thacker Street with First Avenue •Thacker Street with Jeannette Street •Thacker Street with the east alley •Thacker Steet with the west alley •Oakwood Avenue with Lee Road •Oakwood Avenue with the east alley •Oakwood Avenue with Graceland Avenue Based on the turning movement count data, it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic generally occurs between 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour of traffic generally occurs between 4:45 P.M. and 5:45 P.M. Figure 4 illustrates the Year 2023 existing traffic volumes. Attachment 11 Page 41 of 132 SITE ONE-WAY1245 ONE-WAY482 (491)165 (233)196 (159)464 (524)134 (203)208 (205) 144 (182)256 (236)545 (629)204 (331)203 (324)240 (246)258 (243)191 (318)12 (15)17 (21)30 (29)19 (13)12 (9)13 (4)13 (20)12 (9)196 (330)6 (4)5 (7) 5 (10)20 (21)0 (1)10 (16)0 (3)16 (29)558 (592)12 (13)564 (607)10 (14)17 (17)31 (59)69 (90)73 (77)13 (11)2 (9)7 (0)2 (2)7 (3)39 (58)0 (1)6 (7)36 (45)82 (135)63 (43)7 (7)7 (6)3 (8)3 (14)250 (242)10 (9)8 (4)9 (2)4 (4)3 (4)6 (9)3 (18)6 (5)7 (12)6 (10)9 (5) 241 (234) LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:45-5:45 PM) Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 4Job No: 23-102 NNOT TO SCALE STREETJEANNETTESTREETDEMPSTERTHACKER/AVENUEFIRST AVENUELAURELAVENUEGRACELANDROADLEE/MANNHEIMAVENUE OAKWOOD AVENUE OAKWOOD ALLEYWESTALLEYEASTSTREET @ FIRST AVENUETHACKER/DEMPSTERAA A DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3 (2) 31 (22)Attachment 11Page 42 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Train Observations The Union Pacific Metra Northwest crosses Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street in the vicinity of the site. Based on the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) data, the tracks carry an average of 22 daily passenger trains only. Furthermore and based on the Metra schedule, the Des Plaines Metra station is served by 69 trains (34 inbound, 35 outbound) on weekdays, 31 trains on Saturdays, and 19 trains on Sundays operating between 5:00 A.M. and 1:00 A.M. Monday through Friday. Field observations conducted during the peak hours for the crossings of Graceland Avenue and Thacker Street indicated the following: Graceland Avenue Crossing •During the weekday morning peak hour, three Metra train events were observed. The gates were down for approximately 35 seconds on average. The southbound approach queue at the railroad crossing did not extend to Thacker Street with a maximum queue of approximately 12 vehicles. •During the weekday evening peak hour, four Metra train events were observed. The gates were down for approximately 51 seconds on average. The southbound approach queue at the railroad crossing did not extend back to Thacker Street with a maximum queue of approximately 12 vehicles. Thacker Street Crossing •During the weekday morning peak hour, the queues did not extend past Laurel Avenue. •During the weekday evening peak hour, the queues extended past Laurel Avenue for approximately 45 seconds and cleared within 30 seconds after the gate was opened. Crash Data Summary KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data1 for the past five years (2018 to 2022) for the intersections of Thacker Street with Lee Road, Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue, Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue, Lee Road with Oakwood Avenue, Thacker Street with Jeannette Street and Laurel Avenue. A review of the crash data indicated that no crashes were reported at the intersection of Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue. It should be noted that no fatalities were reported at any studied intersection between 2018 and 2022. Tables 1 through 5 summarize the crash data for these intersections. 1 IDOT DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. The author is responsible for any data analyses and conclusions drawn. Attachment 11 Page 43 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 1 THACKER STREET WITH GRACELAND AVENUE - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 2019 3 0 1 1 1 0 6 2020 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 6 0 2 1 3 0 12 Average/Year 1.2 -- <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -- 2.4 Table 2 THACKER STREET WITH LEE ROAD - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 1 0 5 0 7 2019 1 0 1 0 5 0 7 2020 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2021 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2022 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 Total 2 0 2 1 21 0 26 Average/Year <1.0 -- <1.0 <1.0 4.2 -- 5.2 Attachment 11 Page 44 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 3 GRACELAND AVENUE WITH OAKWOOD AVENUE - CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2019 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Average/Year -- -- <1.0 -- <1.0 -- <1.0 Table 4 LEE ROAD WITH OAKWOOD AVENUE – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2019 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2020 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 3 0 0 0 4 0 7 Average/Year <1.0 -- -- -- <1.0 -- 1.4 Attachment 11 Page 45 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 5 THACKER STREET WITH JEANNETTE STREET – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Total 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- <1.0 Attachment 11 Page 46 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan The site, which is currently utilized as the parking lot for Contour Saws Inc., will be redeveloped to provide 56 apartment units (41 one-bedroom units and 15 two-bedroom units) with 64 parking spaces. Access to the development will be provided via a full-movement access drive off Oakwood Avenue located approximately 260 feet east of Graceland Avenue and a full-movement access drive off the alley located approximately 320 feet north of Oakwood Avenue. Both access drives provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed development is included in the Appendix. Directional Distribution The directions from which residents and visitors of the development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the traffic to be generated by the proposed development. Attachment 11 Page 47 of 132 SITE ONE-WAY1245 ONE-WAY35%35%35%15%35%15%430'320'4 5'260' Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 5Job No: 23-102 NNOT TO SCALE STREETJEANNETTESTREETDEMPSTERTHACKER/AVENUEFIRST AVENUELAURELAVENUEGRACELANDROADLEE/MANNHEIMAVENUE OAKWOOD AVENUE OAKWOOD ALLEYWESTALLEYEASTA DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION LEGEND 00' 00%- PERCENT DISTRIBUTION - DISTANCE IN FEETAttachment 11Page 48 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Development Traffic Generation The vehicle trip generation for the overall development was calculated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The “Multifamily Housing” (ITE Land-Use Code 221) rate was used for the proposed residential units. It should be noted that due to the location of the site within close proximity of the Des Plaines Metra Station, census data for the area indicates that five percent of the estimated trips to be generated by the proposed development will be via the public transportation, two percent will walk, and one percent will bike. However, in order to provide a conservative analysis, no reductions were applied. Table 6 shows the estimated vehicle trip generation for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours as well as daily traffic. Copies of the ITE trip generation worksheets are included in the Appendix. Table 6 SITE GENERATED TRIP ESTIMATES ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Weekday Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 56 units 3 10 13 14 8 22 111 111 222 Trip Generation Comparison It should be noted that the site is currently occupied by an approximate 107,000 square-foot manufacturing building and parking lot. Table 7 indicates the trips estimated to be generated by the existing manufacturing site and the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed residential development and the future development of the actual manufacturing building which is located at 900 Graceland Avenue (as discussed later in the report). A comparison between the future development`s generated trips and the manufacturing site shows that the trips estimated to be generated by the existing manufacturing site are approximately 35 percent higher during the weekday morning peak hour and 10 percent higher during the weekday evening peak hour. Attachment 11 Page 49 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 7 TRIP COMPARISON ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Weekday Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 178 units1 13 42 55 43 27 70 379 379 758 140 Manufacturing (~107,000 s.f.) 57 18 75 23 53 76 303 302 605 Difference -44 +24 -20 +20 -26 -6 +76 +76 +152 1 – Sum of both sites Attachment 11 Page 50 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 4.Projected Traffic Conditions The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. Development Traffic Assignment The estimated peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. Figure 6 illustrates the assignment of the vehicle traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed development. Background (No-Build) Traffic Conditions The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on 2050 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate for six years (one-year buildout plus five years) totaling three percent to represent Year 2029 total projected conditions. Additionally, the Year 2029 no-build traffic volumes include the traffic estimated to be generated by the following other area developments: •The generated trips by the Little Bulgaria Center located at 832 Lee Street were estimated and assigned to the roadway system. It should be noted that the pick-up and drop-off activities will take place off the east alley. •It is our understanding that 96 units of the Welkin Apartments located at 1425 Ellinwood Street are unoccupied. The estimated trip to the vacant units were estimated and assigned to the roadway system. •Trips estimated to be generated by a proposed residential development with 122 apartment units to be locate at 900 Graceland Avenue which is currently occupied by Contour Saws Inc. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The total projected traffic volumes include the Year 2029 no-build traffic volumes and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development (Figure 6). Figure 7 shows the Year 2029 total projected traffic volumes. Attachment 11 Page 51 of 132 SITE ONE-WAY1245 ONE-WAY1 (5)1 (2)3 (3)1 (7)7 (5)0 (2)5 (4)2 (1)0 (2)3 (3)2 (1)1 (5)2 (1)1 (4)0 (1)0 (1)1 (1)2 (1)2 (1)2 (1)2 (1)1 (2)1 (2)1 (2)1 (2)1 (2)3 (3)3 (3)1 (5)1 (5)LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:45-5:45 PM) Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 6Job No: 23-102 NNOT TO SCALE STREETJEANNETTESTREETDEMPSTERTHACKER/AVENUEFIRST AVENUELAURELAVENUEGRACELANDROADLEE/MANNHEIMAVENUE OAKWOOD AVENUE OAKWOOD ALLEYWESTALLEYEASTSTREET @ FIRST AVENUETHACKER/DEMPSTERAA C @ WEST ALLEY OAKWOOD AVENUE B C B @ ACCESS DRIVE OAKWOOD AVENUE SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIALAttachment 11Page 52 of 132 SITE ONE-WAY1245 ONE-WAY513 (520)175 (254)209 (167)483 (553)165 (224)246 (225) 167 (197)280 (252)589 (675)238 (361)238 (345)278 (268)285 (261)226 (339)12 (15)18 (22)31 (30)20 (13)12 (9)13 (4)13 (21)12 (9)231 (351)6 (4)5 (7) 5 (10)27 (14)21 (22)3 (4)6 (9)20 (5)11 (21)0 (3)14 (24)0 (0)1 (5)41 (35)1 (2)3 (3)13 (13)1 (7)11 (24)7 (0)0 (5)0 (0)3 (5)30 (38)612 (628)13 (15)632 (650)10 (14)18 (18)55 (75)71 (93)89 (89)50 (11)2 (11)12 (4)22 (6)9 (4)62 (22)10 (10)53 (69)40 (21)11 (6)6 (7)38 (47)85 (144)106 (56)7 (7)7 (6)3 (8)3 (14)277 (260)10 (9)8 (4)9 (2)4 (4)267 (252) LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (8:00-9:00 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:45-5:45 PM) Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 7Job No: 23-102 NNOT TO SCALE STREETJEANNETTESTREETDEMPSTERTHACKER/AVENUEFIRST AVENUELAURELAVENUEGRACELANDROADLEE/MANNHEIMAVENUE OAKWOOD AVENUE OAKWOOD ALLEYWESTALLEYEASTSTREET @ FIRST AVENUETHACKER/DEMPSTERAA 3 (2) C @ WEST ALLEY OAKWOOD AVENUE B C B @ ACCESS DRIVE OAKWOOD AVENUE 32 (23) YEAR 2029 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIALAttachment 11Page 53 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 5.Traffic Analysis and Recommendations The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Traffic Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing and future projected (Year 2029) traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic 11 software. The analysis for the traffic-signal controlled intersection was accomplished using actual cycle lengths and phasings to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing and Year 2029 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 8 through 11. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. Attachment 11 Page 54 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – THACKER STREET WITH GRACELAND AVENUE – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Southbound Overall T/R L/T L T/R Existing ConditionsWeekday Morning E – 59.1 D – 47.8 A 6.3 A 6.5 C 25.7 A – 6.4 Weekday Evening E – 59.0 E – 55.4 A 6.6 A 6.7 C 28.5 A – 6.7 Projected ConditionsWeekday Morning E – 58.3 D – 46.8 A 7.4 A 7.7 C 26.7 A – 7.6 Weekday Evening E – 58.6 E – 57.1 A 7.1 A 7.4 C 29.6 A – 7.4 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn Attachment 11Page 55 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – THACKER STREET WITH LEE ROAD – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Overall L/T T R L/T/R Existing ConditionsWeekday Morning C – 34.9 E 57.5 A 4.9 A – 9.6 C 22.9 D – 48.2 Weekday Evening C – 34.9 E 56.7 A 0.7 A – 9.5 C 22.5 D – 50.7 Projected ConditionsWeekday Morning C – 33.8 E 57.8 A 4.9 B – 11.4 C 24.3 D – 49.3 Weekday Evening C – 34.8 E 56.6 A 0.9 B – 11.0 C 23.4 D – 50.7 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn Attachment 11Page 56 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – EXISTING CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection)1 •Westbound Approach B 11.0 B 11.0 Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection)1 •Eastbound Approach B 10.4 B 11.0 Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue1 •Eastbound Approach B 12.8 B 14.2 •Westbound Approach B 12.2 B 14.7 Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue1 •Southbound Approach B 10.2 B 12.3 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.7 A 8.1 Thacker Street with First Avenue1 •Southbound Approach B 11.2 B 12.3 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Jeannette Street with Thacker Street1 •Northbound Approach B 11.3 B 10.5 •Westbound Left Turn A 8.0 A 7.8 Thacker Street with Alley (West Alley)1 •Southbound Approach B 10.3 B 12.6 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.7 A 8.1 Thacker Street with Alley (East Alley)1 •Northbound Approach B 11.5 B 14.0 •Southbound Approach B 10.9 B 11.6 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 7.8 •Westbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 7.8 Oakwood Avenue with Alley1 •Southbound Approach A 8.4 A 8.5 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.2 A 7.2 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1-All-Way Stop Control. Attachment 11 Page 57 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Table 11 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS –PROJECTED CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection)1 •Westbound Approach B 11.5 B 11.3 Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection)1 •Eastbound Approach B 10.7 B 11.3 Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue1 •Eastbound Approach B 13.8 C 15.1 •Westbound Approach B 13.0 C 15.7 Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue1 •Southbound Approach B 10.5 B 12.7 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Thacker Street with First Avenue1 •Southbound Approach B 11.6 B 12.7 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Jeannette Street with Thacker Street1 •Northbound Approach B 11.8 B 10.7 •Westbound Left Turn A 8.0 A 7.8 Thacker Street with Alley (West Alley)1 •Southbound Approach B 10.7 B 13.2 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.8 A 8.2 Thacker Street with Alley (East Alley)1 •Northbound Approach C 15.4 B 14.0 •Southbound Approach B 12.0 B 12.4 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.9 A 7.9 •Westbound Left Turn A 7.9 A 7.9 Oakwood Avenue with Alley1 •Southbound Approach A 8.5 A 8.6 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.3 A 7.3 Alley with Proposed Access Drive1 •Eastbound Approach A 8.6 A 8.4 •Northbound Left Turn A 0.1 A 0.1 Oakwood Avenue with Proposed Access Drive1 •Southbound Approach A 8.5 A 8.5 •Eastbound Left Turn A 7.3 A 7.3 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1-All-Way Stop Control. Attachment 11 Page 58 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. Thacker Street with Graceland Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The eastbound approach currently operates at LOS E during both peak hours and the westbound approach operates at LOS D during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS E during the weekday evening peak hour. Additionally, the southbound approach operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, overall this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours with increases in delay of approximately one second and less than two seconds, respectively. All the approaches are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during the peak hours with increases in delay of less than three seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the eastbound through movement is projected to be approximately 295 feet during the weekday evening peak hour and will extend to the west alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the westbound through movement is projected to be approximately 280 feet during the weekday evening peak hour and will extend to the east alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Lee Road The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The eastbound approach operates at LOS C during both peak hours and the westbound approach operates at LOS D during both peak hours. Additionally, the northbound approach operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, overall this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS C during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The eastbound and westbound approaches are projected to operate at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The maximum 95th percentile queue for the eastbound through movement is projected to be approximately 245 feet during the weekday morning peak hour and will extend to the east alley but based on the field observations and the traffic simulation, the queue will clear the intersection during each green phase. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Attachment 11 Page 59 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (North Intersection) The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the westbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the westbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Graceland Avenue with Oakwood Avenue (South Intersection) The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Lee Street with Oakwood Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound and westbound approaches currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound and westbound approaches are projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour with increases in delay of approximately one second or less. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Laurel Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the eastbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Attachment 11 Page 60 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Thacker Street with First Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the eastbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with Jeannette Street The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours while the westbound left- turn movement operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the northbound approach and the westbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Thacker Street with West Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours and the eastbound left-turn operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn are projected to continue operating at the existing levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required Thacker Street with East Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. the eastbound and the westbound left-turn movements currently operate at LOS A during both peak hours. Attachment 11 Page 61 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS B during the weekday evening peak hour with increases in delay of less than four seconds. The southbound approach is projected to continue operating at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The eastbound and westbound left-turn movements are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, this intersection has adequate reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Oakwood Avenue with East Alley The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach and the eastbound left- turn movement currently operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. East Alley with Proposed Access Drive The proposed full-movement access drive off the east alley will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the eastbound approach and the northbound left-turn movement are projected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. As such, this intersection will be adequate to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient access to the site. Oakwood Avenue with Proposed Access Drive The proposed full-movement access drive off Oakwood Avenue will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. Under Year 2029 total projected conditions, the southbound approach and the eastbound left-turn movement are projected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours. As such, this intersection will be adequate to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient access to the site. Attachment 11 Page 62 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois Parking Evaluation As previously indicated, the proposed development will have approximately 56 apartment units (41 one-bedroom units and 15 two-bedroom units) with 64 parking spaces. In order to determine the projected parking demand of the proposed development, the parking demand was estimated based on the City of Des Plaines Code of Ordinances and parking rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition. Based on the two methodologies, the parking demand for the proposed development is as follows: Parking Requirements of Proposed Development per City Code •Multifamily Housing (56 Units) o 1 parking space per studio or one-bedroom unit o 1.5 parking spaces per two-bedroom unit Based on the above and the requirements of the City of Des Plaines, this translates into 64 parking spaces It is also important to note that this ratio does not take into account the proximity of the site to the Metra train station. ITE Parking Generation Manual •Residential Use (Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise – Land Use Code 221) o 0.75 space per bedroom Based on the above and the rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, the above translates into 54 parking spaces based on the number of bedrooms which results in a surplus of 10 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed parking supply of 64 parking spaces meets ITE’s requirements of 54 parking spaces. Attachment 11 Page 63 of 132 Proposed Residential Development Des Plaines, Illinois 6.Conclusion Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: •The volume of traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Des Plaines Metra train station. •The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. •Access to the development will be provided via a full-movement access drive off Oakwood Avenue located approximately 260 feet east of Graceland Avenue and a full-movement access drive off the alley located approximately 320 feet north of Oakwood Avenue. Both access drives will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with the outbound movements under stop sign control. •The proposed access drives will be adequate in accommodating the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure that a flexible access system is provided. •The proposed parking supply of 64 spaces will meet the City of Des Plaines and ITE requirements. Attachment 11 Page 64 of 132 Graceland and Thacker Development – Site B Tax Estimate* Ellison Apartments, Des Plaines: $5,300 per unit current taxes. Reduced to $4,240 to reflect differences between the Ellison and the Graceland/Thacker Development. Monarch Apartments, Des Plaines: $5,144 per unit. Reduced $4,115 per unit for subject site to reflect project differences. Northgate Apartments, Wheeling: $4,248 per unit, no reduction as fairly comparable. Subject Site: $4,500 per unit; translating to $252,000 for the site. This would be an increase of $208,000 over the current $43,957 in taxes. *Source: Integra Realty Resources Attachment 12 Page 65 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 66 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 71 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 77 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 78 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 79 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 80 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 81 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 82 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 83 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 84 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 85 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 86 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 87 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 88 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 89 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 90 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 91 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 92 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 93 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 94 of 132 1 Samantha Redman From: Sent:Monday, August 7, 2023 12:58 PM To:John Carlisle; Samantha Redman; Joanne Mendoza; Margaret Mosele Cc:Andrew Goczkowski; Jessica Mastalski; Mark Lysakowski; Mark Walsten; Colt Moylan; Sean Oskerka; Mike Charewicz; Dick Sayad; Carla Brookman; Patricia Smith Subject:For your consideration: Please pass these comments on to the zoning board re Contour Project At the meeting on July 25 re rezoning of Contour Saw project. I hope all of you sit back , read the concerns, and consider what will eventually may happen. I'm glad any decision was postponed at this meeting. Why not just rezone the properties for private homes /townhomes also. Better yet, a school and/or park - I have heard the schools are overcrowded. Also, Give other developers the opportunity for the sites. Maybe this developer would be interested going that route. You would get more interest in the property and hopefully a better plan for the neighborhood if the rezoning included private homes / townhomes. Eventually the inflation has to improve although it might take a while. So why rush into this. It was almost a relief about possible townhomes at Site A. After the bombshell that townhomes would be rentals, and reality set in - along with discussions with area residents- this is a worse scenario than the apartments . You would never be able to control the amount of residents living in a townhouse. Property values will go down, not up. Parking would still be a problem. Attachment 13 Page 95 of 132 2 If you had to keep apartments at Site B. You would have that money generated - and would be more reasonable for the discussion of future and present housing for seniors which was mentioned. The reality is there is a need for this now. The apartments would work at Site B. I agree. I'm all for senior housing. There are 3-5 year waiting lists for senior housing. I have friends who are on waiting lists. They would have additional parking for apartments if they moved the building back further to the west of Graceland. Reconfigure their plans. It would look nicer on Graceland if they did something like the Waterford Condos on Graceland did in front of their condo building. Attachment 13 Page 96 of 132 3 Attachment 13 Page 97 of 132 4 And learning the City took the first offer from one developer, this doesn't seem like a good business plan. Why the rush when you don’t even know what’s going to happen at the journal building site, or the rentals from Welkin and Ellison developments. I'm not certain, but aren't there other developments in the works in Des Plaines. I saw the figures about tax revenue - Approx. 43,000 taxes received now for properties Taxes from federal funding. Approx. 490,000 If it was private property- if 40 townhomes. Generate at least 10,000 -12,000 yearly taxes per unit. 480,000 for the property at Site A If townhomes were privately owned you would generate more taxes in the long run and not compromise the neighborhood. I walked this neighborhood with my granddaughter this past weekend. Such a great safe area with Centennial Park close by. Beautiful. People who own have a stake in the property take care of it. Seeing the townhomes around Mannheim and Touhy shows the future of what might eventually happen. Why not check with surrounding municipals (Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Rolling Meadows and other neighboring municipalities) if they have problems with this kind of a development in the middle of a quiet residential neighborhood. Have you looked into this builder’s credentials? I see one project pending. Talked to Skokie Rezoning….his development was approved but nothing has been done yet. I Attachment 13 Page 98 of 132 5 could not find any building developments he has completed. Wouldn't it be a good idea if this was postponed until you see how Skokie makes out with his development. With all the developments planned in Des Plaines, what is the rush. Right now, You have no idea about the quality and knowledge of the builder's building developments. I do know he was denied building in the City of Chicago at 2835-45 West Belden. The alderman at the time did not want the project. I could not get a reason for the denial. Hopefully, you have more information on the builder. There are other ways to get revenue for the city. Focus on downtown retail. Small shops, restaurants , snack shop would be a good thing close to train. Would love to see a dollar store These are my thoughts along with others. There are so many area residents who have no idea of what is going on, and many who do not have access to internet. I hope you all read next door. When these conversations come up, people have a lot to say but give up. Talking with residents re Webford project. — seems like they feel the resident's opinions in Des Plaines do not matter. Shame so many residents feel that way. Saw that with Kimchi project. Pushed it through because of a potential lawsuit……. Is that how Des Plaines works? Telling developers they are good to go before anything approved and finding out how residents feel about it. I was able to talk to the attorney and owners of the Kimchi project when I left the meeting. I wished them good Attachment 13 Page 99 of 132 6 luck. Very responsible and respectful…….hope it works out for them and Des Plaines residents nearby. Thank you for your consideration. And I hope your decisions don't reflect the term limits set - that many of these decisions are made in haste. I am sorry this happened. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone Chris at Attachment 13 Page 100 of 132 1 Samantha Redman From:Caryssa Buchholz Sent:Monday, August 7, 2023 10:47 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:Re: Contour Saws Site A Attachments:1924 Graceland-Thacker.jpg Samantha, Thank you for forwarding: I do have a few comments in regards to Site A: 1. With the newly proposed plan as townhomes, I believe this is even more a great opportunity than before to utilize a portion of the existing building on-site through re-use for planned components such as the club house. Despite several additions, there is a portion that appears more of the scale of a single family residence. This building dates back to the 1920s - back when the Contour Saws site was primarily single family residence - see attached Sanborn map. In addition, as you can see from the below newspaper clip and if one were to pull the original plat for the Des Plaines Manor subdivision, the triangle plots at the end of Laurel just above the article title is the site in question, which makes it a part of the original single family Garden City-esque subdivision layout. By preserving this single family structure already on the site, it not only honors the history of the city, it maintains the design or even returns the subdivision closer to its original intent and it creates a unique project that will set it apart from residential developments across our own city and every other neighboring city. 2. As for the new construction component, I would like to see more movement in the facades of the townhome designs. I believe them to be too minimalist per the concept renderings. The condominiums kiddy korner to them have stone lintels and ornamentation and the single family residences in the subdivision are very much craftsman in nature, each bearing their own unique character. While it is often cheaper to design a straight facade, I feel if there is not enough detail added in other manners, they can get stagnant/flat. I'd like to see more than just a slight dip at the roofline between units and a material transition to create that movement. I'd like to see detail added with things such as a cornice or window/door trim or juliet balconies or pilasters - minor things that could break the plane while still structurally maintaining a straight facade at a minimum. I also would like to see material choices become a bit more concise. Right now, the rendering indicates 2 colors of face brick, a veneer stone, and a fiber cement panel. I'd prefer to see this brought down to 2 material choices with a contrasting color palette of 2 colors. Attachment 13 Page 101 of 132 2 Attachment 13 Page 102 of 132 3 (Orange outlines buildings originally shown in attached 1924 Sanborn) Thanks in advance for your time, Caryssa Buchholz On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 3:22 PM Samantha Redman <sredman@desplaines.org> wrote: Hi Caryssa, Attached are the presentation documents from the discussion on 7/25. There is an issue uploading to the website, I’m investigating right now. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Attached is the conceptual plan and rendering. Please note the developer has not submitted an application yet for Site A and they are intending to submit later this month. Once submitted, any person is able to examine the application upon request, per section 12-3-1.D (i.e. we will email all plans to you if you ask). Prior to the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, all materials will be available on the website along with the staff report. Attachment 13 Page 103 of 132 4 Note: Site B was recommended for approval on 7/25. However, the petitioner has requested to postpone the City Council meeting for Site B until Site A has been through the Planning and Zoning Board so that both applications can be considered by City Council simultaneously. If you or another community member have comments, please send to me either through email or through the public input form on desplaines.org/contourplace. All comments go directly to our staff so we can incorporate them with our staff review and all public comments are included into the PZB staff report packet. Let me know if you have any questions, thank you. _________________________________________________________________________ How are we doing? Our department wants your feedback. Based on your recent experience with us, please take a few moments to complete this customer satisfaction survey. Samantha Redman Planner City of Des Plaines 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5384 W: desplaines.org From: Caryssa Buchholz Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 2:21 PM To: Samantha Redman <sredman@desplaines.org> Subject: Contour Saws Site A Attachment 13 Page 104 of 132 5 Good Afternoon Samantha, I was just catching up on the Contour Saws Development Proposal and based on the audio from the Site B Planning and Zoning meeting held in July 25th, I believe there was mention that Site A was now being looked at for Townhome development and imagery was presented at the meeting. I didn't see any presentation documents online for Site A. Is that located somewhere where I could see the current proposal for Site A? Thanks, Caryssa Buchholz, AIA, LEED Green Assoc. Attachment 13 Page 105 of 132 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 10:05 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2699455 IP Address: 174.192.69.24 Submission Date: 09/13/2023 10:04 Survey Time: 40 minutes, 36 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design If Welkin is only 50%/not fully occupied (as well as more units coming on Webford)? Is the market telling you there is already enough units available? If these units are not fully occupied, I fear HUD units coming. Des Plaines needs patrons with HIGHER disposable income, not LOWER! Existing home sales are stagnant while new home construction is doing well. Why aren't we building townhouses? The Lee/Center downtown townhouses appear sold-out while Welkin 1/2 empty! How secure is bank line? What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? The green argument to charge for parking is just a diguise. It's just another way to upcharge the renter. If you live in the burbs, 95% of people have at least one car. Milenials are an increasing part of the first time home buying market which would support new townhome rationale. In terms of parking enforcement- Forget it. I've called into the DP police to enforce a Stop sign at my intersection. Dozens of cars run through it every day as no one cares. Welkin many cars park on Elin all day. How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Daily General Comments/Questions DP seems to be hitting the first and only real bid for the development. New home sales are is the only thing moving right now (existing homeowners with low mortgage rates are reluctant to move). Rental units feel saturated and am worried about units going HUD to fill them in the years ahead. Email (optional) Read-Only Content Thank you, Des Plaines, IL Attachment 13 Page 106 of 132 Attachment 13 Page 107 of 132 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Wednesday, September 27, 2023 11:02 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2728994 IP Address: 73.8.105.28 Submission Date: 09/27/2023 11:01 Survey Time: 16 minutes, 22 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design While I do think these buildings would look much nicer than the current factory and empty lot, please do not build anymore rentals. We need more home OWNERSHIP in Des Plaines. Condos are better than apartments. Empty rentals brings in low income housing which leads to increased crime and uneasy vibes residents do not want introduced. This will lead to residents choosing to leave Des Plaines, when the goal of the city is to bring people in. What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? Residents of Des Plaines want more than just housing. We need to keep the suburb vibe and not turn into a “city.” We need eateries, parks, and entertainment options. Des Plaines does not need to put a condo or apartment building in any space we can squeeze. With that said, if you just choose to put housing here, do condos and NOT apartments. Townhomes are too expensive for many homebuyers in this current market. How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Monthly General Comments/Questions Give the name “Des Plaines” a good name for other neighboring suburbs. We have bigger fish to fry…let’s make Des Plaines’ downtown compete with our neighbors, focus on crime, and work on getting more green space. Email (optional) Read-Only Content Thank you, Des Plaines, IL This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email. Attachment 13 Page 108 of 132 1 Samantha Redman From:Des Plaines, IL <media@desplaines.org> Sent:Tuesday, October 31, 2023 1:16 PM To:Samantha Redman Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Contour Place Public Input Contour Place Public Input Submission #: 2796053 IP Address: 75.196.85.68 Submission Date: 10/31/2023 1:15 Survey Time: 10 minutes, 58 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Read-Only Content Section Break Which site concept(s) are you commenting on? Both What comments or questions do you have on the proposed Site or Building Design I live just East of the proposed area. I am kitty corner from Central School. This is a heavily populated area which only leads to the West side of Thacker/Lee Street becoming the same way. The cross walk at Laurel and Thacker/Dempster WON'T do A DAMN thing. The neon green sign put up by the school walk way does SHIT for the speaders. What comments or questions do you have on Neighborhood Impact from this project? The densley populated area, if they converted these to Buy, you MAY get a better clientel of prospective owners or buyers, such as empy nesters. What kind of market research was done in the area to propose renting versus buying? The old Grazianos property are being SOLD, what is the difference. Contour Saw location is much closer to the train and downtown. Please provide market research at next planning meeting! How often have you been near or by this property (within approx. three blocks) in the past six months? Weekly General Comments/Questions I grew up in DP, yeah I am sure you have heard that a lot! I bought in March 2022 in this area as I was starting to see changes, but now it seems the properties that have been sitting vacant for over 10 years are in the same condition or worse. Olivettis is a prime EXAMPLE.. The building is crumbling and that EYE sore in the back of the property could easily be a place for vagrants etc. Leonas is another empty spot. ARE THE LEASE prices to high for businesses to move in? DP couldn't even keep Panera . If DP could be even half of what MP is, the revenue that would be generated would skyrocket. Does DP think they are getting enough revenue from the Casino?? I am dumfounded by what I have seen over the last 40 plus years in town! Email (optional) Read-Only Content Attachment 13 Page 109 of 132 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org July 26, 2023 Mayor Goczkowski and Des Plaines City Council, CITY OF DES PLAINES Subject: Planning and Zoning Board, Zoning Text Amendments, Case # 23-040-MAP RE: Consideration of Zoning Map Amendment from C-3 to R-4 at Approximately 919-921 Graceland Avenue Honorable Mayor and Members of the Des Plaines City Council: The Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) met on July 25, 2023 to consider the request: 1.The petitioner’s representative explained their request to change the zoning of the property from C-3 to R-4. The representative explained the rationale for the amendment, that the property is located within an area suited for a multifamily development and the proposed project would compliment the existing character of the neighborhood. The representative’s architect then delivered a presentation on the specific elements of the project, stating there will be 56 dwelling units and 65 parking spaces, including 3 accessible spaces and 3 EV spaces. Amenities for the residents will be located on the first floor and landscaping will meet or exceed code requirements. A private park will be located on the east side of the development and a seven-foot-wide sidewalk will be added along Oakwood Avenue where one does not exist. The representative’s traffic engineer delivered a presentation on the traffic study included with the packet and stated the conclusions of the study, that the traffic will not be significantly impacted by the proposed project and will be reduced due to the proximity to the Metra train station. The petitioner’s representative concluded the presentation describing how the proposed map amendment meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.The board asked about whether EV charging spaces would be increased in the future; the petitioner’s representative said more could be added if there is increased demand. The board asked about a discrepancy between the access points on some of the proposed plans; the petitioner’s representative stated the original plans included an access point along the alley, but would have required the alley to be reconstructed. However, the development team was able to accommodate access from the one point along Oakwood, without requiring the alley access. The Board asked if the decision tonight was for a zoning change, but does not represent an endorsement of the project. The petitioner’s representative said this is correct, this request is only a zoning change. 3.Staff provided the staff report, discussing the history behind the property, existing conditions and the request. Staff discussed the differences between condominiums and apartments and explained that the City is not able to require a development to be condominiums. Staff described how the request meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and described the Site Plan Review completed by staff when evaluating this request. 4.Public comment included questions about whether the City attempted to attract businesses to this property that would allow it to be used for its existing zoning and comprehensive plan designation; Staff stated that while they can facilitate interactions with businesses and property owners, it is private property and staff do not have the same resources as a real estate agent or broker, but the City does maintain an available properties map. A member of the public asked about the distance of the building Attachment 14 Page 110 of 132 from the train and stated they would like an independent traffic study for the area. Staff stated the tracks are at least 20-22 feet from the property line and there is an additional setback of the building from the property line. A member of the public stated they have lived across from the property for sixteen years and they are happy to see a change from the manufacturing use to a residential use. A member of the public stated they are concerned with the business model in Des Plaines with developers not being the end owners and concerns about the developers not caring about the community long term. 5. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended (6-0) that the City Council approve of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment from C-3 to R-4. Respectfully submitted, James Szabo Des Plaines Planning and Zoning Board, Chairman Cc: City Officials/Aldermen Attachment 14 Page 111 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING July 25, 2023 MINUTES Pending Applications: 1.Address: Approximately 919-921 Graceland Avenue Case Number: 23-40-MAP (parking lot for 1217 Thacker Street) The petitioner has requested a zoning map amendment to rezone the subject property from C-3 General Commercial to R-4 Central Core Residential, and any other variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PIN:09-20-203-006-0000 Petitioner:Luz and Associates #1, LLC, 2030 West Wabansia Ave., Chicago, IL 60611 Owner/Property Control: Contour Saws, Inc., 100 Lakeview Parkway, Ste. 100, Vernon Hills, IL 60061 Ward Number: #2, Alderman Colt Moylan Existing Zoning: C-3, General Commercial Surrounding Zoning: North: R-4, Central Core Residential South: Railroad and C-3, General Commercial East: C-3, General Commercial West: M-2, General Manufacturing Surrounding Land Uses: North: Multi-family residential building South: Railroad and commercial office buildings East: Commercial buildings West: Former Contour Saws manufacturing building Street Classification: Graceland Avenue is classified as a minor arterial road. Comprehensive Plan: Industrial is the recommended use for this property. Attachment 15 Page 112 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP Property/Zoning History: The property was formerly the parking lot associated with the Contour Saws manufacturing facility located to the northwest. The Contour Saws building was built in the 1960s and operated in this location until 2020. Historic aerials indicate the site has been developed as a parking lot since the early 1960s, and the use has never changed.1 Between 1938 and 1960, zoning for the property changed from commercial to light industrial and back to the current commercial zoning. However, no commercial use has ever been associated with this property. The property is currently owned by Contour Saws and is vacant. Project Description: The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the main Contour Saws building property on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing a zoning map amendment from C-3, General Commercial to R-4, Central Core Residential. The amendment would allow for a contemplated multifamily residential building at this site, one of two that are proposed for the former Contour Saws facility. Zoning Map Amendment Overview The purpose of a zoning map amendment is to determine whether an existing zoning district is suitable for a location and, if not, which zoning district would be more suitable, given the context of the neighborhood, city goals, and local, state, and national development trends. Although a specific project can be considered alongside any zoning application, zoning change deliberation often looks at a property at a larger scale within the neighborhood and city. However, a Site Plan Review, as required by Section 12-3-2, was performed for the conceptual project at this site. The Site Plan Review contributes to the overall assessment of a zoning map amendment, demonstrating the feasibility of a specific project with this zoning. Refer to the Site Plan Review section of this report and associated attachments. C-3 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-4 Zoning The C-3, General Commercial zoning district is intended to accommodate a diversity of businesses. Out of all of the commercial districts, C-3 permits the largest number of different uses, allowing for 37 uses permitted by right (meaning no zoning entitlement process) and 28 conditional uses. A broad variety of uses are allowed, including retail, office, restaurants, and other commercial services. However, this site has never been developed with a commercial use, despite having the most permissive commercial zoning for decades. Even with the closure of Contour Saws in 2020, the site remains an unoccupied, surface parking lot. The Comprehensive Plan envisions this 1 Historic Aerials, 1961 Aerial, historicaerials.com Attachment 15 Page 113 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP area for manufacturing uses; however, the plan was written in 2019 prior to the unanticipated closure of Contour Saws in 2020. Considering this site has never successfully been developed into a commercial use, the zoning map amendment process allows the City to determine if another type of use would be more suitable. This site is uniquely situated near many amenities and services necessary to support residential development. Few available properties exist in Des Plaines with the transit, recreational, and commercial opportunities available within walking distance, making this site an ideal location for additional residential versus commercial or manufacturing development. Within a half-mile of the property (an approximate 8-15- minute walk for the average person2), the following services are available. Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment for further details. Service Transit Des Plaines Metra Station platform; Pace Bus Stops for Lines 226, 230, and 250, and PULSE Downtown Commercial Area Restaurants, retail/personal services including dentist, optometrist, urgent care, private gym, and salons Schools (private and public) Central Elementary School, Willows Academy, Little Bulgarian School, Islamic City Center of Des Plaines Academy Parks Centennial Park, Central Park, Paroubeck Park, Potowatomie Park Public Buildings Library, City Hall A change to the zoning would be necessary to allow residential uses on this property. No new residential uses are permitted within the C-3 zoning district in this location. An analysis of the various options for residential zoning districts is necessary to determine what is best suited for this site. Below is a table of residential zoning districts and the residential uses permitted within them. Residential Districts Use Matrix Use R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Single Family Detached P C* C* C* Townhouse Not permitted Not permitted P P Two-family (duplex) Not permitted P Not permitted Not permitted Multi-Family Not permitted Not permitted P P 2 Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speeds of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, page 17. Attachment 15 Page 114 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP *Note: Only applies to single-family detached dwellings that were lawfully constructed prior to August 17, 2020 and are located in a zoning district other than R-1. The R-1 and R-2 zoning districts would restrict the density of residential units at the property, limiting the development potential. As the name suggests, the R-1, Single Family Residential district limits the number of dwelling units to one dwelling unit per parcel. The R-2, Two-Family Residential district similarly limits the number of dwellings to two units per parcel. To allow for more than one or two residences on this 1.23-acre property, the property would need to be subdivided. If the property were subdivided to meet the R-1 or R-2 bulk standards, it is unlikely the property could produce more than five residential units. The property is also too small to allow for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which would allow for smaller lots but requires a minimum parcel size of 2 acres (Section 12-3-5.B.3). The R-3, Townhouse Residential and R-4, Central Core Residential districts provide the option to increase the number of units on this parcel without requiring subdivision. Comparatively, a townhouse or multi-family development would supply a greater number of units in the same amount of space, creating a more efficient and economical option for this location. The main difference between the R-3 and R-4 districts are the bulk standards. The table below provides a comparison. R-3 Versus R-4 Bulk Standards Bulk Controls R-3 R-4 Maximum height 45 ft 80 ft Minimum front yard 25 ft 12 ft Minimum side yard Buildings 35 ft. and under: 5 ft. Over 35 ft.: 10 ft. Buildings 35 ft. and under: 5 ft. Over 35 ft.: 10 ft. Minimum rear yard Buildings 35 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 35 ft.: 30 ft. Buildings 40 ft. and under: 25 ft. or 20% of lot depth, whichever is less Buildings over 40 ft.: 25 ft., plus 2 ft. for every 10 ft. over 40 ft. Minimum lot width 45 ft. 45 ft. Minimum lot area 2800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit 40,700 sq. ft (.93 acres).1 Attachment 15 Page 115 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP 1. The minimum lot area for a zoning lot in the “R-4 Central Core Residential District” shall be either 10,000 square feet or shall be determined by the total sum of the required minimum lot area of each dwelling unit on the zoning lot in accordance with the table in Section 12-7-2.J. R-3 and R-4 zoning districts both allow for multifamily residential development. However, R-3 requires 2,800 square feet of space per dwelling unit, allowing a maximum of 19 units on this 53,731-square-foot (1.23-acre) property. Compared to R-3, the R-4 district allows for a significantly larger number of residential units, requiring smaller lot areas per unit and allowing for a taller building. Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population The existing housing stock throughout the city is predominantly single-family residential and the Comprehensive Plan states it is a goal to maintain this stock of high-quality single family residential property within the city. However, the detached single family housing type is an increasingly unaffordable product for many existing and future residents. In comparison, townhouses and multi-family provide additional housing stock at a more financially attainable scale due to the smaller size and reduced maintenance cost. An important goal of 2019 Comprehensive Plan is providing avenues to allow residents to age-in-place and improve accessibility. As of 2015, the percentage of Des Plaines residents 50 or older was 40.2%, compared to the regional average of 31.4%.3 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, this percentage is likely to grow, with one in five Americans at retirement age by 2030.4 Households approaching retirement are frequently interested in downsizing to limit maintenance costs and reduce monthly housing costs to meet limitations of fixed incomes. Supplying a diverse housing stock in this area provides the option for seniors to continue living within the city. A residential development in this location would be close enough to facilities and services for an aging population to independently complete activities of daily living, with many amenities available within walking or transit distance. In terms of accessibility, it is relevant to note that multifamily housing developments, either private or public, with four or more units are required to meet accessibility requirements outlined in the Fair Housing Act.5 This includes provisions requiring certain units to have accessible access, routes, and usable private and common spaces for individuals with disabilities. Note buildings separated by a firewall, such as townhouses, are not subject to these accessibility requirements.6 Additionally, the International Building Code (IBC) 3 Des Plaines 2019 Comprehensive Plan, Page 32 https://www.desplaines.org/home/showpublisheddocument/162/637612522934400000 4 U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Older People Projected to Outnumber Children for First Time in U.S. History, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html 5 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Accessibility Requirements for Buildings https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/disabilities/accessibilityR 6 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Act Design Manual, Page 10 Attachment 15 Page 116 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP requires buildings of a certain size to have at least one elevator and it must be able to accommodate an ambulance stretcher (IBC 2015 Section 3002.4). Overall, multi-family residential developments over a certain size versus single-family detached or attached residences provide a greater likelihood of providing the accessibility needs of an aging population and provide additional housing opportunities for individuals with disabilities regardless of age. With these considerations regarding the location of the property near other R-4 zoned, multi- family properties, the proximity to numerous private and public services, and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan focused on providing diversity of housing stock and providing accessible options for residents, senior or otherwise, the R-4 zoning district is a suitable fit for this property. Site Plan Review Proposed Project Overview The petitioner proposes a four story, 56-unit multi-family residential development and associated parking lot and private park space. Note the proposed development is one of two for the former Contour Saws properties; the site to the north will be reviewed and considered as a separate application. This type of development is a permitted use in the proposed R-4 Central Core Residential district if it follows all bulk regulations and other standards. The below diagram illustrates staff’s interpretation of where the required yards are located for this property, as noted in Section 12-7-2 and defined in Section 12-13-3. _____________ https://www.huduser.gov/portal//Publications/PDF/FAIRHOUSING/fairfull.pdf Attachment 15 Page 117 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP The table on the following page compares the R-4 district regulations with the proposed development on the subject property. R-4 -Central Core Residential District Bulk Standards Bulk Controls Required Proposed Maximum height 80 ft.1 48 ft. Minimum front yard 12 ft. 15 ft. Minimum side yard 5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard 25 ft. 25 ft.1 Minimum lot width 50 ft. 193.86 ft. Minimum lot area 40,700 sq. ft.2 (refer to Footnote 2 and associated table below) 53,731.42 sq. ft. Note: 1. Off-street parking spaces are permitted to be located in any required yard, including the rear yard, per Section 12-9-6.C. 2. The minimum lot area for a zoning lot in the “R-4 Central Core Residential District” shall be either 10,000 square feet or shall be determined by the total sum of the required minimum lot area of each dwelling unit on the zoning lot in accordance with the following table, whichever is greater: Number Of Bedrooms Minimum Lot Area (Square Feet) Efficiency dwelling unit 600 1 bedroom 700 sq. ft. minimum required lot area * 41 units proposed = 28,700 sq. ft. of lot area required 2 bedrooms 800 sq. ft. minimum required lot area * 15 units = 12,000 sq. ft. of lot area required Total Required Lot Area: 40,700 sq ft Attachment 15 Page 118 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP Site Plan Review Standards Pursuant to Section 12-3-7.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, a Site Plan Review is required for all map amendment requests to assess how the request meets the characteristics identified in Section 12-3-2, which are listed below along with staff’s assessment of each in relation to the current Site Plan provided by the petitioner, located in the Site Plan attachment. Note many of the provided plans include an entrance/exit from the alley. However, the developer has chosen to remove this proposed driveway in favor of one entrance entering and exiting. The Site Plan attachment provides the most up to date plan; this plan was used to complete the Site Plan Review below. All other updated plans, including an updated traffic study, will be provided with any future Planning and Zoning Board and City Council packets and will be uploaded onto the desplaines.org/contourplace when available. Site Plan Review Item Analysis (based on Proposal) The arrangement of structures on the site ·Places the building along the street frontage rather than the parking lot. By placing a building along a street rather than the parking lot, the design presents better cohesion with the buildings surrounding it by placing the building at approximately the same distance from the property line as adjacent multi-family buildings. ·A more efficient design would involve the placement of parking in a parking garage underneath the building, rather than surface parking. However, it is unknown the expense and the impact on economic viability for this project if this site design change were required. Taking into consideration the current use (vacant surface parking lot), the proposed development provides a substantially more efficient use of the property. The arrangement of open space and landscape improvements ·Landscaping is provided around the building in excess of requirements along the front yard and perimeter parking lot landscaping meets zoning requirements. In addition, a private park space is proposed, as noted on the plans. Refer to Landscape Plan attachment. ·Staff advises the movement of the shade tree shown on the landscape plan from the corner between Oakwood Avenue and the alley to improve visibility for vehicles and pedestrians entering and exiting the driveway. The tree will need to be located elsewhere on the property and staff will confirm the landscape plan includes the required amount of parking lot landscaping at time of building permit. Attachment 15 Page 119 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP The adequacy of the proposed circulation system on the site ·Curb cut closed onto Graceland, pushing traffic to Oakwood Ave. and the alley. The traffic study provided with this application demonstrates that proposed traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. It is important to note the existing parking lot includes over one hundred parking spaces and the Contour Saws facility likely generated a greater amount of traffic for employees and deliveries than proposed with this residential development. The Board may seek to ask the petitioner if they anticipate any significant changes to traffic with the updated site plan (eliminating the entrance/exit of the parking lot into the alley) not reflected in the traffic impact study. ·The closure of a curb cut along Graceland Ave and replacing with a parkway and walkway improves safety and comfort of pedestrians along this side of Graceland. The proximity of the building to the street also provides better surveillance within the neighborhood, with windows facing the residential neighborhood and providing additional “eyes on the street.” ·A loading/unloading zone within the development eliminates traffic on the adjacent streets and alley for deliveries, dumpster pickup, and ride sharing for proposed future residents and visitors. ·Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12- 9-7, providing sixty-five spaces which is the minimum required amount. It is anticipated, as discussed in the petitioner’s response to standards and the provided traffic study, that the proximity of the site to numerous transit options and a bike route along Thacker St, will reduce dependence on automobiles for this project. The location, design, and screening of proposed off-street parking areas ·Perimeter landscaping, including required shrubs and shade trees, are provided around the proposed parking lot. A private park blocks some view of the parking lot from Oakwood Ave. ·Site is situated in such a way that the parking lot has minimum visibility from Graceland Avenue and Oakwood Avenue and minimal conflict with pedestrians along public walkways. The adequacy of the proposed landscaping design on the site ·All required landscaping in terms of perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping and landscaping of required yards is fulfilled. Attachment 15 Page 120 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP ·Private park space provided in the southwestern area of the property with accessible walking path to the building and from Oakwood Ave. The design, location, and installation of proposed site illumination ·Photometric plan demonstrates conformance with Section 12- 12-10, with no more than 0.2-foot candles spilling over the property line in any location, well within the limits of the zoning ordinance. ·The parking lot is properly illuminated, with at least 0.1 footcandles in any parking area, meeting requirements of Section 12-9-6.G. The correlation of the proposed site plan with adopted land use policies, goals, and objectives of the comp. plan ·Does not fit the manufacturing use illustrated by the Comprehensive Plan; however, the 2019 plan was written on the assumption that the Contour Saw facility will continue operating. ·The proposed plan supports the following goals (refer to “Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population” and “C-3 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-4 Zoning” sections of this report for further details): o Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs. o Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points o Goal 4.5 – Plan for and identify policies and tools that ensure accessibility ·In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. Summary of Public Outreach In an effort to improve community engagement and transparency surrounding new, large developments within Des Plaines, the City provided numerous opportunities for residents to review the proposal and provide input. To provide regular project updates, a webpage on the city website was created: desplaines.org/contourplace. On June 6, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Board hosted a public workshop to provide the developer, board, and the public an opportunity to review plans and provide input into the proposed development at this location and the former Contour Saws facility to the north of this property. After this meeting, the project webpage was updated to include a public input form to continue Attachment 15 Page 121 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP gathering community comments on the plans. Refer to Public Comment attachment for all public comments. Standards for Zoning Map Amendment: The following is a discussion of standards for zoning map amendments from Section 12-3-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance. Rationale for how well the proposal addresses the standards is provided below and in the attached petitioner responses to standards. The Board may use the provided responses as written as its rationale, modify, or adopt its own. 1.Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the City Council; The Comprehensive Plan was written in 2019 when the Contour Saws facility was still operating. Due to the manufacturing facility’s longstanding operations in Des Plaines, the Comprehensive Plan did not envision this area to be used for anything else. However, the proposed amendment and development would meet several goals from the Housing chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, including: Goal 4.1. Ensure the City has several housing options to fit diverse needs; Goal 4.3 Provide new housing at different price points; and Goal 4.5 Plan for and identify policies and tools that ensure accessibility. Refer to “Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population” and “C-3 Zoning and Suitability of the Site for Proposed R-4 Zoning” sections of this report for further details. In addition to housing goals, the proposed development meets economic goals of the city by providing additional property tax revenue compared to the existing use of the site. Refer to the Tax Projections attachment. PZB Modifications (if any): _____________________________________________________ 2.Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with current conditions and the overall character of existing development; The subject property is adjacent to R-4 zoning to the north and is close to several similar multifamily developments. The area is in close proximity to numerous services within walking, biking or transit distance, Refer to Amenities and Services Map attachment. Any proposed development would need to meet all building material and design requirements outlined in Section 12-3-11 – Building Design Review, including requirements for face brick which will be similar in design to the adjacent multi-family residential buildings in this neighborhood. PZB Modifications (if any): _____________________________________________________ 3.Whether the proposed amendment is appropriate considering the adequacy of public facilities and services available to this subject property; Attachment 15 Page 122 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP An engineering and utility plan was prepared with this application. Based on the provided site plan, City engineering staff did not indicate any concerns with the adequacy of public facilities or services being available to meet the needs of this proposed development. A traffic impact study was provided with this application to assess impacts of the proposed development (Refer to Traffic Study attachment). The study indicated the traffic generated by this use would not create a significant impact on the surrounding street network. The Board may seek to ask the petitioner if they anticipate any significant changes to traffic with the updated site plan (eliminating the entrance/exit of the parking lot into the alley) not reflected in the traffic impact study. It is important to note the previous use of this property was an employee parking lot with over one hundred parking spaces, while the proposed residential development provides 65 parking spaces as well as a loading and unloading zone. At minimum, this development brings less potential for vehicles to be travelling in and out of the site at peak hours versus one hundred employees of a manufacturing facility. Parking meets the off-street parking requirements of Section 12-9-7, providing 65 spaces which is in excess of the minimum required amount. PZB Modifications (if any): _____________________________________________________ 4.Whether the proposed amendment will have an adverse effect on the value of properties throughout the jurisdiction; and The proposed map amendment would allow for residential uses on a property that has been zoned commercial for decades and, throughout its history, existed as a surface parking lot for employees of a now closed manufacturing facility. A building that provides additional residential options for the area and required to follow the Building Design Standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance creates a more appealing urban design for the neighborhood versus an unoccupied surface parking lot. PZB Modifications (if any): _____________________________________________________ 5.Whether the proposed amendment reflects responsible standards for development and growth. The current use of this property is a surface parking lot for a manufacturing use that is unlikely to be filled with another similar manufacturing business. Despite the commercial zoning, the property has remained unimproved for several years, and remains vacant and in disrepair. Providing a residential use for the property, particularly a use that capitalizes on the close proximity to downtown Des Plaines and the various amenities associated with the area, would present a more efficient and useful way to use this property. As discussed in the Demographic Trends and Accommodating an Aging Population section, the City needs to promote opportunities that increase housing stock for a diversity of populations in the area, both in the short term and long term. Amending the zoning district for this property, regardless of the Attachment 15 Page 123 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP proposed project, provides an additional opportunity to construct a multifamily development in an area with similar residences and with the necessary services to support this type of use. PZB Modifications (if any): _____________________________________________________ PZB Procedure and Recommended Conditions: Under Section 12-3-7.D (Procedure for Review and Decision for Amendments) of the Zoning Ordinance, the PZB has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above- mentioned zoning map amendment. City Council has final authority on the proposal. Consideration of the request should be based on a review of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 12-3-7.E (Standards for Amendments) of the Zoning Ordinance. If the PZB recommends and City Council ultimately approves the request, staff recommends the following conditions. Attachments: Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Site and Context Photos Attachment 3: Project Narrative and Responses to Standards Attachment 4: Amenities and Services Map Attachment 5: Plat of Survey Attachment 6: Site Plan Attachment 7: Architectural Plans and Site Plan Attachment 8: Landscape Plans Attachment 9: Engineering Plans Attachment 10: Photometric Plan Attachment 11: Traffic Impact Study Attachment 12: Property Tax Projections Attachment 13: Public Comments Chair Szabo swore in Rolando Acosta, Attorney, Keith Lee, Architect and Javier Millan Traffic Consultant, representative for the petition. Rolando Acosta described the scope of the project. He explained Site B – Contour Place, located approximately at 919 & 921 Graceland Ave. He stated that they are looking for a Zoning Map Amendment to change zoning from C-3 to R-4. He explained the Graceland and Oakwood site map. Mr. Acosta displayed a map showing services within a ½ mile of the subject site. He stated that multifamily developments add to the population of Des Plaines. He displayed a zoning map including the zones in the site area. He displayed an aerial of the project side including the existing heights of the neighboring properties. Mr. Acosta displayed the ground level plan which includes 56 residential dwelling units in a four-story building and 65 parking spaces. Attachment 15 Page 124 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP Keith Lee through a power point presentation, displayed a view of the project on Graceland and Oakwood. He stated there will be 56 units with amenities on the first floor. He showed the proposed Building Elevations from all views. He explained the locations for the two entrances. He displayed the types of material would be used. He stated that the building design would be comparable to others in the area. He stated the building would have an elegant look with the long balconies. Mr. Lee described the Landscape Plan which includes a park. He stated that they will be adding a 7-foot-wide sidewalk on Oakwood. He stated there would be a 15-minute walk to downtown and the Metra station. He stated there will be a surface parking lot with 65 spaces including 3 accessible spaces and 2 EV spaces. Javier Millan explained the traffic study. Full movement to the site will be provided by an access drive on Oakwood Avenue. KLOA did two traffic studies on a weekday morning and two in the evening. The conclusions from the study are: o Generated traffic volume will be reduced due to proximity to Metra Train Station o Capacity analysis indicates that proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on area roadways. o Full access drive from Oakwood Avenue is well located and provides suitable access for inbound and outbound traffic, with outbound traffic under stop sign control. o The proposed parking supply of 65 spaces will meet the Des Plaines and ITE requirements. Mr. Acosta concluded the presentation by stating that they are looking for a Map Amendment to go from C-3 to R-4. He stated that the petitioner’s goals are similar to the Des Plaines Comprehensive Plan in providing alternative modes of housing in the area. He stated that they will be improving property values because this is an improved condition from the current vacant parking lot. He believes that the project is meeting responsible development and growth standards by providing housing near transportation. Member Hofherr asked if they are able to add additional EV charging if there is demand for it. Mr. Acosta stated that they can add more charging stations if there is a demand. Member Weaver asked about the difference in the drawings with the two access points on some plans, versus one access point on others. He also asked about the decision to face the entrance of the building towards the parking lot. He wanted to know if the visitors had to walk into the parking lot to enter. Mr. Acosta stated that when the process was started, they had two access points. One of the access points was to the alley and the other was to Oakwood. However, City staff stated it would be required to reconstruct the alley if the development uses it as an access point and that was too high of a cost burden. They realized they could use accommodate need for access from one point using Oakwood. He also stated that they have two entrances one off of Oakwood and one off of the parking lot. Residents and visitors could use either entrance. Attachment 15 Page 125 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP Member Weaver asked if the decision for tonight’s board is for the zoning change and not an endorsing of the plan as it currently stands. Mr. Acosta stated that is correct. Samantha Redman, Planner, gave the staff report. She gave a PowerPoint presentation explaining the petitioner’s request. She explained the Location Map and Description. The subject property is zoned C-3, General Commercial and has been commercial for decades, but the Comprehensive Plan illustrates it as “manufacturing” because it was associated with a manufacturing use. One parcel included this surface parking lot, previously used for employees of Contour Saws. Ms. Redman presented the Site Photos giving a current view of the project. She explained the background of the former Contour Saws site. She discussed the PZB Special Workshop on June 6, 2023, where the project concepts were given, comments were received and a webpage was provided for additional information and comment. Ms. Redman explained the request for the zoning map amendment to go from C-3 to R-4. She explained a chart for the uses for the R-4 Central Core Residential District. She presented a chart with information on Condominiums versus Apartments. She explained the Residential Purpose and Goals including general purpose statement for residential zoning districts and Housing Chapter of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. She presented the Site Plan Review which explains the connection between the proposed site plan with adopted land use policies, goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan which includes the Housing Objectives and the Economic Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, including supporting increasing tax revenue. Ms. Redman explained the Existing Conditions, Surrounding Area and Site Plan slides. Ms. Redman stated the PZB considerations which includes one action to recommend approval, approval with conditions, continuance, or denial of zoning map amendment from C-3 to R-4, noting that Zoning Map Amendments do not have conditions of approval. Chair Szabo asked if any audience members have any questions or concerns about the petition. Chair Szabo swore in Marian Cosmides, neighbor to the property. She asked if any other projects were considered for this site. She wanted to know if any external resources were used to attract businesses to the site. She asked about following the Comprehensive Plan to attract a business or manufacturer to the site. She stated that she feels that Des Plaines is becoming a bedroom community. She would like an independent traffic study. She asked about the occupancy at the Welkin. She also asked how close the property would be to the train tracks. Ms. Redman responded to the questions. She stated that no other petitioner has submitted an application for this property. She stated that the City maintains an available properties map. Ms. Redman reminded the board that this is a private property. Ms. Redman stated that the current plans state the property would have at least a 25-foot setback and Oakwood Avenue is 20 to 22 foot wide. Chair Szabo swore in Myrna Simes, neighbor to the property. She stated that she has lived across from the property for 16 years. She was not happy with the manufacturing, smoke emissions and smokestacks that went along with the prior owner. She stated that she is happy about the proposed Attachment 15 Page 126 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP development. She stated she would rather see apartments or condos then more factories. She stated she would rather look at a residential property than a factory. Chair Szabo swore in Tom Loveland, neighbor to the property. He stated he was happy to hear about the townhouses for the other property site. He stated he feels like we have a recurring business model which includes Developer, Builder Financier and an end owner. He stated that the end owner is not in for the long run and does not care about the area or the community. He would like to see ownership that is more long term. A motion was made by Board Member Weaver, seconded by Board Member Saletnik to recommend approval of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment to go from C-3 to R-4 at the approximate address of 919-921 Graceland. He noted that this is a zoning change and not a design approval. AYES: Weaver, Saletnik, Veremis, Fowler, Hofherr, Szabo NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY *** Attachment 15 Page 127 of 132 Citywide Text Amendment 23-043-TA 919-921 Graceland Map Amendment 23-040-MAP New Business 1. Update from Luz & Associates on Plan and Application for 900 Graceland/1217 Thacker (“Site A”) of the Contour Place Redevelopment a. Petitioner provided a conceptual site plan, different from the public workshop, for discussion only. No votes or actions to be taken on this site. b.Once an application is submitted, public hearing will be scheduled and noticed at a later date Rolando Acosta gave a presentation to describe the scope of the project. He explained that the new concept for Site A would be 45, three-story townhouses with green space and a club house. There would be an one access point from Graceland and one access point from Thacker. There will be 2 parking spaces per townhouse and 16 guest spaces. He displayed the Site Plan. He displayed the Building Rendering and explained that the design, elevation, and materials would be similar color palette and design to the other multifamily building. Chair Szabo asked if they will be looking for a zoning change from R-3 to R-4 and how many units they plan to build. Samantha Redman stated that townhomes are allowed in both R-3 and R-4. She stated that the proposed plan has 45 units. Member Fowler asked if these would be rental and if there will be elevators. Mr. Acosta stated that they changed their plans from 122 apartment to 45 townhouses for rent. He stated that the townhouses would be 2 and 3 bedrooms, so likely no elevators. He expects to charge $3,800 per month rent. He said they will have to make some of the units adaptable for accessibility purposes. Member Weaver asked about the garages and the asphalt. He asked if city code requires two spaces per unit. Samantha Redman stated that city code requires two parking spaces per dwelling and one guest space per four units. Marion Cosmides asked the rationale for rentals versus purchase. She is concerned about the excessive demand on city resources by transient residents. She asked if the rentals will be converted into ownership. Mr. Acosta stated that the rationale is for diversity of product, lessening the burden of ownership, and ease of financing. He stated that in the future, if there is demand, the rental could be converted into individual purchase units. Chair Szabo asked when they think they will bring the petition to the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Acosta plans to bring it to the board in September. Attachment 15 Page 128 of 132 CITY OF DES PLAINES ORDINANCE Z - 34 - 23 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR 1217 THACKER STREET/919-921 GRACELAND AVENUE, DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS. (CASE #23-040-MAP).___________ _ WHEREAS, Luz and Associates #1, LLC (“Developer”) is the contractor purchaser of the property commonly known as 1217 Thacker Street/919-921 Graceland Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois ("Subject Property") which is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Graceland Avenue and Oakwood Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is currently improved with a surface parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is currently located in the C-3 General Commercial District of the City ("C-3 District"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12-3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Developer filed an application with the City for the approval of a map amendment to the “Zoning Map of the City of Des Plaines” ("Zoning Map") to rezone the Subject Property from the C-3 District to the R-4 Central Core Residential (“R-4 District”) to allow the Developer to construct a multifamily development with 41 units ("Map Amendment"); and WHEREAS, within 15 days after the receipt thereof, the Petitioner’s applications were referred by the Department of Community and Economic Development to the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Des Plaines ("PZB"); and WHEREAS, within 90 days after the date of the Developer’s applications, a public hearing was held by the PZB on July 25, 2023, pursuant to publication in the Des Plaines Journal on July 5, 2023; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, during the public hearing the PZB heard testimony and received evidence with respect to how the Developer intended to satisfy and comply with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12-3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the PZB filed a written report with the City Council on September 26, 2023, summarizing the testimony and evidence received by the PZB and stating its recommendation, by a vote of 6-0, to approve the Map Amendment, subject to certain terms and conditions; and Page 129 of 132 WHEREAS, the Developer made representations to the PZB with respect to Proposed Map Amendment, which representations are hereby found by the City Council to be material and upon which the City Council relies in approving the Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the written report of the PZB, the applicable standards for map amendments set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, and the Community and Economic Development Staff Memorandum dated July 21, 2023 and has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and the public to approve the Map Amendment in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for the approval of the Requested Relief. SECTION 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. The Subject Property is legally described as: LOTS 8 AND 9 (EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID LOTS 8 AND 9 CONVEYED TO RAILROAD BY DOCUMENT NO. 668085) AND LOT 10 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 11 IN BLOCK 5 IN PARSON AND LEE’S ADDITION TO DES PLAINES IN SECTION 17 AND 20, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINICPAL MERIDIAN IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS PIN: 09-20-203-006-0000 and is commonly known as 1217 Thacker Street/919-921 Graceland Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois. SECTION 3. APPROVAL OF MAP AMENDMENT. Pursuant to Section 12-3-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council has considered the factors relevant to the approval of map amendments and has determined that the procedure for the review of map amendments has been satisfied. The Map Amendment to rezone the Subject Property from the C-3 District to the R-4 District is hereby approved. Page 130 of 132 SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any paragraph, section, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect without affecting the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. A. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect only after the occurrence of the following events: 1. its passage and approval by the City Council in the manner provided by law; 2. its publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law; SECTION 6: SEVERABILITY. If any paragraph, section, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect without affecting the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 131 of 132 PASSED this _______ day of _______________, 2023. APPROVED this _________ day of ____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES ________ NAYS _________ ABSENT ________ MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK Published in pamphlet form this Approved as to form: _______ day of __________________, 2023. CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel Page 132 of 132 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS HELD IN THE ELEANOR ROHRBACH MEMORIAL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER, MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2023 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Illinois, was called to order by Mayor Goczkowski at 7:00 p.m. in the Eleanor Rohrbach Memorial Council Chambers, Des Plaines Civic Center on Monday, December 4, 2023. ROLL CALL Roll call indicated the following Aldermen present: Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz. A quorum was present. Also present were: City Manager Bartholomew, Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance Wisniewski, Director of Public Works and Engineering Oakley, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Johnson, Fire Chief Anderson, Police Chief Anderson, and General Counsel Friedman. PRAYER AND PLEDGE The prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America were offered by Alderman Oskerka. PROCLAMATIONS City Clerk Mastalski read a proclamation by Mayor Goczkowski declaring December 5, 2023 as International Volunteer Day. APPOINTMENTS Mayor Goczkowski swore-in MATT SAGEN as Engineer/Paramedic – Fire Department. Mayor Goczkowski swore-in MAX VERLINSKY as Engineer/Paramedic–Fire Department. PROMOTIONS Mayor Goczkowski swore-in JOE MORDELL as Lieutenant – Fire Department. MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD IN THE ELEANOR ROHRBACH MEMORIAL COUNCIL CHAMBERS DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER, MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2023 PUBLIC HEARING/ CONSIDER APPROVING THE CDBG PROG CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE & EVAL REPORT FOR PY2022 Resolution R-216-23 Mayor Goczkowski called the Public Hearing for consideration of Resolution R-216-23, approving the Community Development Block Grant program consolidated annual performance and evaluation report for program year 2022, to order at 7:08 p.m. Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Johnson reviewed a memorandum dated November 21, 2023. The Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report (CAPER) is an annual document detailing the accomplishments of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and requires City Council approval before submitting to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City of Des Plaines Program Year (PY) 2022 CAPER summarizes the performance of the City towards the goals established in its PY2022 Annual Action Plan and 5-year CDBG Consolidated Plan. Program Year 2022 took place during the period of October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2023, and was Year 3 of the current Consolidated Plan. The CAPER details the expenditures and accomplishments of the City’s public service, housing, and infrastructure activities performed during the Program Year. Moved by Sayad, seconded by Brookman, to Approve Resolution R-216-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2022. CONSENT AGENDA #14. Page 2 of 9 12/4/2023 Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. Mayor Goczkowski adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:16 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT A couple of residents requested help with parking issues during times of service at a local religious location. Alderman Lysakowski requested consideration of increasing parking fines from $25 to $100. City Council had consensus to have staff draft something to adjust the parking fines. A couple residents expressed issues their neighborhood has regarding Prestige located in Mount Prospect, and they asked for an official letter from the Mayor to Mount Prospect representing the Des Plaines residents. Mayor Goczkowski stated he would provide a letter to the mayor of Mount Prospect. Alderman Charewicz requested to also have staff look into leaf parking regulations. Alderman Oskerka asked if snow parking regulations could be added for staff review. ALDERMAN ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Goczkowski stated going forward he will rotate at each meeting which Alderman will start Alderman announcements. Alderman Sayad stated he will be having a ward meeting either late January or early February at the Golf Road Baptist Church. He also expressed concern regarding bike riders without lights, and reminded the residents of lights being needed for safety. He also thanked everyone for coming to the tree lighting ceremony. Alderman Brookman gave an update regarding The Foxtail on the Lake. Alderman Walsten mentioned there was an incident in Elk Grove; stating individuals should not make rushed decisions over what happen before the investigation is concluded. Alderman Charewicz thanked everyone involved with the tree lighting ceremony. He also mentioned he is hosting a ward meeting tomorrow, the 56th District State Representative Michelle Mussman is having a town hall meeting December 7th at Friendship Conservatory at 6:00 p.m., the Senior Center is having a senior lunch on December 25th at 12:00 p.m. and the Senior Center is having a Supply Drive on December 17th. Alderman Lysakowski mentioned the amazing job staff did with the holiday lights in downtown Des Plaines. MAYOR ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Goczkowski echoed the great job staff did with the holiday tree lighting and the lights. He also mentioned Alderman Charewicz is hosting a ward meeting tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. at Friendship Park Conservatory. He also mentioned the Cook County Board of Appeals stated Maine Township and Elk Grove Township are currently open for appeal through December 12th; further information can be found at www.cookcountyboardofreview.com. CONSENT AGENDA Alderman Walsten requested item #4 to be removed from the Consent Agenda Page 3 of 9 12/4/2023 Moved by Sayad, seconded by Lysakowski, to Establish the Consent Agenda without item #4. Upon voice vote, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve the Consent Agenda without item #4. Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. Minutes were approved; Ordinance M-19-23, M-20-23 were adopted; Ordinance M-22-23, M-24-23 were approved; Resolutions R-215-23, R-217-23, R-219-23, R-220-23, R-221-23, R-222-23, R-223-23, R-224-23, R-225-23, R-226-23, R-227-23, R-228-23, R-229-23, R-230-23, R-231-23 were adopted. City Clerk Mastalski read the item removed from the Consent Agenda. APPROVE VACATING ALLEY/ 1864 ILLINOIS ST Consent Agenda Ordinance M-22-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve First Reading of Ordinance M-22-23, AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC ALLEY AT 1864 ILLINOIS STREET. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE & AUTH FUNDS/ LEG ADV SVCS/ RAUCCI & SULLIVAN Consent Agenda Resolution R-215-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-215-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO A PROPOSAL FROM RAUCCI & SULLIVAN STRATEGIES, LLC FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE AGRMT/ TRAIN/ POLICE LAW Consent Agenda Resolution R-217-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-217-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH POLICE LAW INSTITUTE, INC. FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE T.O. 8/ LIBRARY MAIN ROOF/ FGM ARCH Consent Agenda Item #4 was removed from the Consent Agenda. Alderman Walsten asked about the possibility of adding solar panels at the conclusion of the roof replacement. Page 4 of 9 12/4/2023 Resolution R-218-23 Moved by Walsten, seconded by Sayad, to Approve Resolution R-218-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER NO. 8 WITH FGM ARCHITECTS INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO THE REPLACEMENT OF THE MAIN ROOF AT THE DES PLAINES PUBLIC LIBRARY. Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. APPROVE T.O. 7/ SWITCHGEAR/ TROTTER Consent Agenda Resolution R-219-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-219-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER NO. 7 WITH TROTTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE CITY HALL ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR REPLACEMENT. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE AGRMNT/ DEMO WORK Consent Agenda Resolution R-220-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-220-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH (AWARDED CONTRACTOR) FOR DEMOLITION WORK. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. AUTH NICOR/ GAS DISTRIB SYS Consent Agenda Ordinance M-24-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve First Reading of Ordinance M-24-23, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, D/B/A NICOR GAS COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A GAS DISTRIBUTING SYSTEM IN AND THROUGH THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE & ACCEPT PROPOSAL/ MUN BLDGS. GAS/ NICOR Consent Agenda Resolution R-221-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-221-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL FROM NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, D/B/A NICOR GAS COMPANY, TO PROVIDE GAS TO MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE IGA/ SIDEPATH/ COOK CTY & ROSEMONT Consent Agenda Resolution R-222-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-222-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WITH THE COUNTY OF COOK AND THE VILLAGE OF ROSEMONT IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVON AVENUE SIDEPATH PROJECT. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE T.O.1/ WTR SVC REP/ BERGER Consent Agenda Resolution R-223-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-223-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER NO. 1 WITH BERGER EXCAVATING CONTRACTORS, INC. FOR ADDITIONAL WATER SERVICE REPAIR SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. Page 5 of 9 12/4/2023 APPROVE M.C. & T.O.1/ PROF ARCH SVCS/ ACG LTD Consent Agenda Resolution R-224-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-224-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT AND TASK ORDER NO. 1 WITH ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING GROUP, LTD FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE M.C./ PROF ENG SVCS/ CIVILTECH Consent Agenda Resolution R-225-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-225-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT WITH CIVILTECH ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE M.C./ PROF ENG SVCS/ H.R. GREEN Consent Agenda Resolution R-226-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-226-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT WITH H.R. GREEN, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE M.C./ PROF ENG SVCS/ THOMAS GROUP Consent Agenda Resolution R-227-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-227-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT WITH THOMAS GROUP SOLUTIONS, LLC, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE M.C./ PROF ENG SVCS/ WALKER Consent Agenda Resolution R-228-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-228-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT WITH WALKER CONSULTANTS/ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE M.C./ PROF SCADA INTGR SVCS/ WUNDERLICH- MALEC Consent Agenda Resolution R-229-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-229-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER CONTRACT WITH WUNDERLICH-MALEC ENGINEERING, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SCADA INTEGRATION SERVICES. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE AGRMT/ CDBG/ NWHP Consent Agenda Resolution R-230-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-230-23, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS WITH NORTH WEST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP REGARDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. Page 6 of 9 12/4/2023 APPROVE/ ANIMAL CTRL SVCS/ NWAH Consent Agenda Resolution R-231-23 Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve Resolution R-231-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROCUREMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FROM NORTHWEST ANIMAL HOSPITAL, P.C. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. SECOND READING/ ORDINANCE M-20-23 Consent Agenda Advanced to second reading by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Adopt the Ordinance M-20-23, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND RESTRICTED RESIDENT PARKING DISTRICTS NEAR O’HARE AIRPORT. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. SECOND READING/ ORDINANCE M-19-23 Consent Agenda Advanced to second reading by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Adopt the Ordinance M-19-23 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING TAXES FOR THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS FOR THE TAX LEVY YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2023 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE MINUTES Consent Agenda Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting of November 20, 2023, as published. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. APPROVE MINUTES Consent Agenda Moved by Brookman, seconded by Walsten, to Approve the Closed Session Minutes of the City Council meeting of November 20, 2023, as published. Motion declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS CONSIDER AUTH THE ACQUISITION THROUGH CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPLE TITLE AT 1504 MINER ST Ordinance M-3-23 The City Council has provided direction to City Staff and the General Counsel to move forward with the acquisition of the Property located at 1504 Miner Street. Since that direction was given, the City has been attempting to engage the owner of the Subject Property in negotiations with the goal of reaching a mutual agreement on a price at which the owner would be willing to sell the Subject Property to the City and at which the City would be willing to purchase the Property from the owner. Mayor Goczkowski stated there are some interested parties in the property; that both staff and himself are satisfied that the owner is working diligently to try and fill this property. Moved by Sayad, seconded by Oskerka, to postpone indefinitely Ordinance M-3-23, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THROUGH CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1504 MINER STREET. No Vote. Moved by Charewicz, seconded by Brookman, a substitute motion to defer until April 1, 2024 Ordinance M-3-23, AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THROUGH CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPLE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1504 MINER STREET. Upon voice vote, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. Page 7 of 9 12/4/2023 NEW BUSINESS FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION – Alderman Sayad, Chair WARRANT REGISTER Resolution R-232-23 Alderman Sayad presented the Warrant Register. Moved by Oskerka, seconded by Brookman, to Approve the Warrant Register of December 4, 2023, in the Amount of $5,525,160.67 and Approve Resolution R-232-23. Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. CONSIDER APPROVING THE 2024 ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY Resolution R-233-23 The City Council held two budget hearings over the 2024 Proposed Budget document. The first meeting was held on October 12th and the discussion covered the review of the General Fund. The second budget meeting was held on October 18 to review the Non-General Funds within the budget document. Within those discussions, the City Council voted and approved all expenditures, revenues, and the resulting fund balances to support City services and projects. Additionally, during these meetings, the City Council achieved a consensus on additional changes to be included as part of the 2024 Final Budget document. 2024 Budget Snapshot: The Fiscal Year 2024 annual budget totals $194.5M (excluding transfers), a $20.4M or 11.7% increase over the 2023 Budget. Moved by Sayad, seconded by Brookman, to Approve Resolution R-233-23, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2024 ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DES PLAINES. Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – Alderman Moylan, Chair CONSIDER APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMD & A PRELIM PUD PLAT FOR 900 GRACELAND AVE & 1217 THACKER ST Ordinance Z-33-23 The petitioner is requesting the following under the Zoning Ordinance for the properties at 900 Graceland Avenue and 1217 Thacker Street: (i) a Map Amendment to rezone from M-2 General Manufacturing to R-3 Townhouse Residential District; (ii) a Preliminary PUD, with exceptions for minimum front yard and minimum lot area, to allow a 50-unit townhouse development. The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the Contour Saws parking lot on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing to build a 50-unit townhouse development and a private, publicly accessible park on the property. The proposal includes the removal of all existing buildings and structures to redevelop the subject property into a 50-unit townhouse PUD. The proposed development consists of eight separate three story townhouse buildings with various numbers of units depending on the building. A publicly accessible, privately owned park is proposed at the north corner of the Page 8 of 9 12/4/2023 development with landscaped areas throughout the development. The anticipated unit mix will be 33 three-bedrooms and 17 two-bedrooms, with a unit size ranging from approximately 2,200 to 2,500 square feet each. Each unit will have a two-car, attached garage and thirteen surface parking spaces are provided for guests on the site. The parking lot of the former Contour Saws facility is proposed to be a 56-unit multifamily development. While the subject property is currently not owned by the petitioner, the petitioner does intend to take ownership of the property upon approval of the requests in this application. Because the development will involve rental units with one property management and maintenance entity, a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) is not required at this time; however, a condition of approval states if the development is subdivided into separate, fee-simple townhouse units, an HOA must be established to manage and maintain the proposed PUD. The proposal does not meet the minimum front yard size and does not meet the minimum lot area, requiring a PUD exception. The exceptions allow for a development that efficiently uses the irregularly shaped parcel in a way that would not be possible under the strict application of the code. The proposed 50-unit PUD requires a minimum of 100 off-street parking spaces and 13 common guest spaces. The PUD Site Plan indicates two covered off- street garage spaces for each unit and guest parking provided by thirteen standard spaces, including one accessible space in an interior parking area of the development. The proposal includes a consolidation of the property from eight lots to two lots. One lot will be 130,406 square feet, proposed to be developed with the townhouses and associated structures. A second lot, 6,182 square feet, is proposed to be a publicly accessible, private park space. The Department of Public Works and Engineering (PWE) has provided comments based on the submittal. The memo states the following is required with this subdivision, to be finalized at the final plat of subdivision stage: 1. Grind and re-surface eastbound lane on Thacker Street. 2. Add 8” water main to replace 4” water main along a portion of Graceland Avenue. 3. Add pedestrian crosswalk crossing on Thacker Street including a bump-out, striping, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB). 4. The sole streetlight along Graceland Avenue must be replaced and electrical conduit undergrounded. Petitioner will work with staff and ComEd to coordinate this replacement. The PZB voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the Zoning Map Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD). The attorney for the project spoke on behalf of the petitioner. Moved by Oskerka, seconded by Sayad, to Approve, with the recommended conditions, First Reading of Ordinance Z-33-23, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAT FOR 900 GRACELAND AVENUE AND 1217 THACKER STREET (CASE #23-039-MAP- PUD-SUB). Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. Page 9 of 9 12/4/2023 Jessica M. Mastalski – CITY CLERK APPROVED BY ME THIS DAY OF , 2023 Andrew Goczkowski, MAYOR CONSIDER APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMD FOR 1217 THACKER ST/919-921 GRACELAND AVE Ordinance Z-34-23 The petitioner is requesting to rezone the property at PIN 09-20-203-006-0000 (approximately 1217 Thacker Street/919-921 Graceland Avenue) from C-3 General Commercial to R-3 Townhouse Residential. The petitioner is Luz and Associates, which is the contract purchaser of the subject property, along with the main Contour Saws building property on the other side of Graceland. They are proposing a zoning map amendment from C-3, General Commercial to R-4, Central Core Residential. The amendment would allow for a contemplated multifamily residential building at this site, one of two that are proposed for the former Contour Saws facility. The petitioner proposes a four story, 56-unit multi-family residential development and associated parking lot and private park space. The proposed development is one of two for the former Contour Saws properties; the site to the north will be reviewed and considered as a separate application. The PZB voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the map amendment. Moved by Moylan, seconded by Oskerka, to Approve First Reading of Ordinance Z-34-23, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR 1217 THACKER STREET/919-921 GRACELAND AVENUE, DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS. (CASE #23-040- MAP). Upon roll call, the vote was: AYES: 8 - Lysakowski, Moylan, Oskerka, Sayad, Brookman, Walsten, Smith, Charewicz NAYS: 0 - None ABSENT: 0 - None Motion declared carried. OTHER MAYOR/ ALDERMEN COMMENTS Alderman Sayad mentioned the City Council meeting of January 2, 2024, has been cancelled. Mayor Goczkowski reminded 8th ward residents there is a meeting tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. at Friendship Park Conservatory. Alderman Oskerka thanked staff for their meeting presentations and including additional staff in the presentations. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Brookman, seconded by Oskerka to adjourn the meeting. Upon voice vote, motion declared carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m. 2 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5300 desplaines.org Date: To: From: December 6, 2023 Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager Dorothy Wisniewski, Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance Subject: Resolution R-243-23, December 18, 2023, Warrant Register Recommendation: I recommend that the City Council approve the December 18, 2023, Warrant Register Resolution R-243-23. Warrant Register……………………………$8,733,157.59 MEMORANDUM Estimated General Fund Balance Balance as of 10/31/2023: $31,087,135 Please use caution when evaluating this number as revenues fluctuate dramatically from month to month due to delays in receiving sales tax revenue from the State and 1st & 2nd installments of property tax revenue. Page 1 of 24 NEW BUSINESS #1A. CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R-243-23 Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines that the following bills are due and payable and that the Mayor and City Clerk be and are hereby authorized to make payment for same. December 18, 2023 Page 2 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount 1 4630 Resident Ambulance Fees 7814 Medicare B Illinois DPIL-2140645:1 Medical Reimbursement DOS 10/04/2021 388.56 2 4630 Resident Ambulance Fees 1459 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois DPIL-2324839:1 Medical Reimbursement DOS 06/09/2023 1,394.55 3 4632 GEMT Reimbursements 8359 HFS Bureau of Fiscal Operations - GEMT GEMT202234066 GEMT Funds Reimbursement 2022 Qtrs 3 & 4 and 2023 Qtrs 1 & 2 802,652.65 4 4632 GEMT Reimbursements 8359 HFS Bureau of Fiscal Operations - GEMT GEMT202234066 GEMT Funds Reimbursement 2022 Qtrs 3 & 4 and 2023 Qtrs 1 & 2 718,718.56 1,523,154.32 5 6000 Professional Services 8453 Raucci & Sullivan Strategies LLC 4292 Lobbyist Services - December 2023 - R-193-22 5,000.00 6 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 385.70 5,385.70 7 5320 Conferences 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 10/8- 10/13 Reimb Meals/Mileage MCI Conf 10/08-10/13/2023-City Clerk 345.62 8 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 01/11/2023 Reimb N/NWMCA Dinner Meeting 01/11/2023-City Clerk 30.00 9 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 03/09/2023 Reimb N/NWMCA Dinner Meeting on 03/09/2023-City Clerk 30.00 10 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 05/10/2023 Reimb N/NWMCA Dinner Meeting on 05/10/2023-City Clerk 30.00 11 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 06/16/2023 Reimb for CIMCO Municipal Clerks Training 6/16/23 -City Clerk 75.00 12 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 07/21/2023 Reimb MCI Summer Seminar 07/21/2023-City Clerk 35.00 13 5325 Training 8523 Mastalski, Jessica Reimb 09/13/2023 Reimb for N/NWMCA Dinner Meeting on 9/13/2023-City Clerk 30.00 14 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 42.30 15 6100 Publication of Notices 1050 Journal & Topics Newspapers 191296 Legal Notice - BFPC Rules and Regulations 11/08/2023 103.46 16 6100 Publication of Notices 1050 Journal & Topics Newspapers 191334 Legal Notice - Tax Levy 11/08/2023 320.80 17 6100 Publication of Notices 1069 Paddock Publications Inc 269667 Legal Notice - Phase 5 Hazard Mitigation Grant 11/02/2023 37.80 18 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5620267-0 2 Cases of Copy Paper 99.98 19 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 8.00 20 7500 Postage & Parcel 1041 Federal Express 8-304-16870 Shipping Charge Overnight to Chicago Title 10/26/2023 69.70 21 7500 Postage & Parcel 1041 Federal Express 8-318-07768 Shipping Charge to Chicago Title 11/09/2023 7.80 1,265.46 6,651.16 Total 00 - Non Departmental Elected Office Division: 110 - Legislative Total 110 - Legislative City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account Fund: 100 - General Fund Department: 00 - Non Departmental Division: 120 - City Clerk Total 120 - City Clerk Total 10 - Elected Office Page 3 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 22 6005 Legal Fees 8897 Emry Murdoch LLC 11274 Legal Fees - 1374-1384 Oakton Ave Eminent Domain Matter Oct 2023 3,961.88 23 6005 Legal Fees 8897 Emry Murdoch LLC 11275 Legal Fees - 281-299 River Road Eminent Domain Matter Oct 2023 3,350.00 24 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15281 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 150.00 25 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15291 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 348.00 26 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15293 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 351.00 27 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15294 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 2,376.50 28 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15295 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 234.00 29 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15296 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 273.00 30 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15300 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 180.00 31 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15301 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 113.00 32 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP DEC 2023 RET December 2023 Retainer 19,500.00 33 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP NOV 2023 RET November 2023 Retainer 19,500.00 34 6009 Legal Fees - Admin Hearings/Prosecutions 8958 Robbins DiMonte Ltd 259639 Legal Fees - October 2023 7,535.75 35 6010 Legal Fees - Labor & Employment 1127 Clark Baird Smith LLP 17630 Legal Fees - Labor & Employment Matters 11/01-11/18/2023 2,812.50 36 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 42.30 37 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5621076-0 Copy Paper, Binder Clips and Rubberbands 141.35 38 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 104.92 60,974.20 39 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 (27.48) 40 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 339.55 41 6300 R&M Software 5068 IT Savvy LLC 01463868 VMWare Subscription 01/27/2024 to 01/26/2025 5,125.36 42 6300 R&M Software 1035 Dell Marketing LP 10712647475 VLA Enterprise Defender Endpoint 400 Licenses-11/01/2023- 10/31/2024 18,600.00 43 6300 R&M Software 1322 Insight Public Sector 1101113601 130 Netmotion Licenses 10/30/2023 - 10/30/2024 11,245.00 44 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 85.94 35,368.37 45 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 247.51 46 6108 Public Relations & Communications 1050 Journal & Topics Newspapers 191338 Veterans Day Ad 11/08/2023 620.00 47 6108 Public Relations & Communications 8802 Corporate Product Solutions Inc. 5063 100 Lanyards and 100 Key Chain Promotional Giveaways 714.85 1,582.36 City Administration Division: 210 - City Manager Total 210 - City Manager Division: 230 - Information Technology Total 230 - Information Technology Division: 240 - Media Services Total 240 - Media Services Page 4 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 48 5340 Pre-Employment Testing 1320 IL State Police 20231001755 Fingerprint Background Check Services - Oct 2023 56.50 49 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 101.13 50 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 85.94 243.57 98,168.50 51 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 144.26 52 6110 Printing Services 6485 Tyler Business Forms Invoice-87582 W2 and 1099 Forms & Envelopes for Tax Year 2023 11/02/2023 737.59 53 7000 Office Supplies 8690 ODP Business Solutions LLC 336792616001 13 Wastebaskets and 1 Pack of Post- It Pads 14.99 54 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc C5608851-0 Quarterly Ecommerce Credit Rebate May-July 2023 (49.36) 55 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc C5618431-0 Quarterly Ecommerce Credit Rebate Aug-Oct 2023 (65.84) 56 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 260.80 57 7200 Other Supplies 8690 ODP Business Solutions LLC 336792616001 13 Wastebaskets and 1 Pack of Post- It Pads 48.75 58 7500 Postage & Parcel 1041 Federal Express 8-325-54796 Delivery Service 11/16-11/17/2023 69.49 1,160.68 59 6000 Professional Services 3337 HR Green Inc 168979 Building Inspection & Plan Review Services October 2023 3,489.17 60 6000 Professional Services 5764 GovTempUSA LLC 4290528 Permit Tech Clerical-Wks Ending 11/5 & 11/12 /Price Adj for Oct 3,261.30 61 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63225 Plan Review 11/15/2023 Project #1129624 1,345.01 62 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63233 Plan Review 11/15/2023 Project #1129506 100.00 63 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63255 Plan Review 11/17/2023 Project #1129636 895.01 64 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63279 Plan Review 11/21/2023 Project #1129647 1,050.00 65 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63280 Plan Review 11/21/2023 Project #1129648 1,350.00 66 6000 Professional Services 6315 B&F Construction Code Services Inc 63290 Plan Review 11/22/2023 Project #1129653 225.00 67 6000 Professional Services 8629 Health Inspection Professionals Inc 665 Health Inspections Contractor August 2023 8,130.00 68 6000 Professional Services 8629 Health Inspection Professionals Inc 669 Health Inspections Contractor September 2023 9,405.00 69 6000 Professional Services 8629 Health Inspection Professionals Inc 686 Health Inspections Contractor October 2023 9,960.00 70 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15292 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 20,354.50 Division: 250 - Human Resources Total 250 - Human Resources Total 20 - City Administration Division: 410 - Building & Code Enforcement Department: 30 - Finance Total 30 - Finance Community Development Page 5 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 71 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 711.08 72 6025 Administrative Services 7961 BridgePay Network Solutions LLC 1192311 Utility Web, Business License Trans & EnerGov Fees Oct 2023 0.50 73 6025 Administrative Services 7961 BridgePay Network Solutions LLC 1192311 Utility Web, Business License Trans & EnerGov Fees Oct 2023 42.20 74 6025 Administrative Services 7961 BridgePay Network Solutions LLC 1192311 Utility Web, Business License Trans & EnerGov Fees Oct 2023 0.20 75 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 223.33 60,542.30 76 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15278 11-23 Non-Retainer Matters 90.00 77 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 78.31 78 6100 Publication of Notices 1050 Journal & Topics Newspapers 191241 Legal Notice 10/25/2023 for PZB Mtg 11/14/2023 178.70 79 6100 Publication of Notices 1050 Journal & Topics Newspapers 191261 Legal Notice for CDBG CAPER 11/01/23 for City Council 12/4/2023 159.89 506.90 61,049.20 80 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 80.03 81 6300 R&M Software 8974 Ritter GIS Incorporated 21640 TO#1 Imp of Cityworks-11/9- 11/15/23/App Dev 2023-2024 R-195-23 40,780.00 82 6300 R&M Software 8976 Azteca Systems LLC, a Trimble Company INV7756 Cityworks Software - 12/01/2023- 11/30/2024, R-196-23 62,650.00 103,510.03 83 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 170.17 170.17 84 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1385 GIS Consortium 711 Fee to Support Shared Assets of GIS Property 01/01-12/31/2023 6,800.00 6,800.00 85 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 283.37 86 6040 Waste Hauling & Debris Removal 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 111723 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 10/31-11/02/2023, R-194-23 3,667.00 87 6170 Tree Maintenance 6555 Landscape Concepts Management Inc 41525 Stump Removal & Restorations - 08/24/2023, R-143-22 7,961.13 Total 410 - Building & Code Enforcement Division: 420 - Planning & Zoning Total 420 - Planning & Zoning Total 100 - Administration Division: 510 - Engineering Total 510 - Engineering Total 40 - Community Development Public Works & Engineering Division: 100 - Administration Division: 520 - Geographic Information Systems Total 520 - Geographic Information Systems Division: 530 - Street Maintenance Page 6 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 88 6170 Tree Maintenance 6555 Landscape Concepts Management Inc 41526 Emergency Tree Removals - 11/07/2023, R-143-22 3,527.74 89 6170 Tree Maintenance 6555 Landscape Concepts Management Inc 41527 Tree Trimming - Big Bend Dr - 11/08/2023, R-413-22 758.07 90 6170 Tree Maintenance 6555 Landscape Concepts Management Inc 41697 Parkway Tree Removals - 09/28 & 11/20/2023, R-143-22 9,973.46 91 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 5399 Beary Landscape Management 265229 Gateway Sign Maintenance - Rand/Wolf - 08/28/2023, R-27-21 2,475.00 92 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 5399 Beary Landscape Management 265230 Gateway Sign Maintenance - River/Gregory - 08/28/2023,R-27-21 1,325.00 93 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 5399 Beary Landscape Management 271349 Weed Control - 165 Mount Prospect Rd - 11/02/2023, R-165-22 350.00 94 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 7706 Lakeshore Recycling Systems LLC PS571564 Street Sweeping - Leaf Season - 11/06/2023, R-188-21 17,556.78 95 6325 R&M Street Lights 1044 H&H Electric Co 42408 Streetlight Repair - Drake/Cornell - 10/18/2023, R-29-22 758.82 96 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5616393-0 Tape, Calendars, Copy Paper, Ink - PW 30.15 97 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26688 Hose Clamp, Adapter, Elbow, Teflon Tape, Etc. - PW 43.35 98 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 1208 Steiner Electric Company S007473356.001 4 Locknuts 31.60 99 7055 Supplies - Street R&M 4177 Uline Inc 171173746 Safety Walk Tape 179.71 100 7200 Other Supplies 1057 Menard Incorporated 23848 4 Cans Spray Paint 27.92 101 7300 Uniforms 2067 Cutler Workwear PS-INV027001 2 Pairs Boots - Quartermaster Stock 179.95 49,129.05 102 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 217.35 103 6145 Custodial Services 8073 Crystal Maintenance Services Corporation 31454 Custodial Services - 7 Buildings - December 2023, R-156-22 8,240.00 104 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 7146 JOS Services Inc 11446 Plumbing Repairs - Metra Train Station - 11/15/2023 1,050.00 105 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8826 Chem-Wise Pest Management 1209463 Pest Control - Metra Train Station - 11/16/2023 50.00 106 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8826 Chem-Wise Pest Management 1209490 Pest Control - City Hall - 11/16/2023 60.00 107 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8826 Chem-Wise Pest Management 1209492 Pest Control - Police Station - 12/16/2023 60.00 108 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8826 Chem-Wise Pest Management 1209499 Pest Control - Food Pantry - 11/16/2023 40.00 109 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1742 Fredriksen Fire Equipment Co 227299 Fire Extinguisher Maintenance - Fire Station #61 - 09/26/2023 852.87 110 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1029 Cintas Corporation 4173875801 Mat Service - Police Station - 11/14/2023 138.77 Division: 535 - Facilities & Grounds Maintenance Total 530 - Street Maintenance Page 7 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 111 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1029 Cintas Corporation 4173875844 Mat Service - Metra Train Station - 11/14/2023 38.28 112 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1029 Cintas Corporation 4174532185 Mat Service - Metra Train Station - 11/20/2023 38.28 113 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1029 Cintas Corporation 4175396317 Mat Service - Police Station - 11/29/2023 138.77 114 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1029 Cintas Corporation 4175396337 Mat Service - Metra Train Station - 11/29/2023 38.28 115 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7506 Otto Baum Company Inc 23-20-029-P2 Facade Rehabilitation P2 - PW & CH - 11/01-11/30/2023, R-141-23 25,706.38 116 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7506 Otto Baum Company Inc 23-20-029-P2 Facade Rehabilitation P2 - PW & CH - 11/01-11/30/2023, R-141-23 46,950.62 117 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7506 Otto Baum Company Inc 2320029NC1 Tuckpointing - City Hall - 10/24/2023 2,363.40 118 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 1135 Colley Elevator Co 250684 Cat 1 Elevator Testing - Theater - 09/29/2023 630.00 119 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7717 Oak Brook Mechanical Services Inc 34665 HVAC Inspections & Repairs - Theater - 05/26/2023 1,980.00 120 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7717 Oak Brook Mechanical Services Inc 34666 HVAC Repairs - Theater - 05/28- 05/29/2023 1,380.49 121 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 1237 Pro-Line Door Systems Inc 96547 Overhead Door Repair - Fire Station #63 - 11/15/2023 2,716.60 122 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 8772 Helm Service CHI193868 HVAC Repair - Police Station - 10/22 & 10/31/2023, R-228-22 1,005.00 123 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5616393-0 Tape, Calendars, Copy Paper, Ink - PW 30.15 124 7025 Supplies - Custodial 1029 Cintas Corporation 4174532119 Cleaners, Paper Towels, Soap, Mat, Scrubs, Etc. - PW 190.22 125 7025 Supplies - Custodial 1029 Cintas Corporation 4175396341 Cleaners, Paper Towels, Soap, Mat, Scrubs, Etc. - PW 214.26 126 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 0023449 Drywall, Poplar Board, Power Grab, Adhesive - City Hall 4th Fl 203.14 127 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 0023504 Switches, Wall Plates, Etc. - City Hall 4th Floor 154.09 128 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 7807 L&W Supply Corporation 1008185838-001 Building Supplies - City Hall Media Studio 700.59 129 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 7807 L&W Supply Corporation 1008234322-001 Insulation - City Hall Media Studio 371.88 130 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 3378 Michael Wagner & Sons Inc 1012409 Valve - City Hall 66.98 131 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 3378 Michael Wagner & Sons Inc 1012713 Elbow & J-Bend Washer - City Hall 29.42 132 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 1023250 Steel Track, Studs, Tapcons, Insulation, Etc. - City Hall 4th Fl 495.01 133 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 1023307 Drywall, Tape, Primer, Screws - City Hall 4th Floor 200.89 134 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 1070598 2 Paint Brushes - City Hall 4th Floor 34.94 135 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1018 Anderson Lock Company LTD 1134951 Cylinder Change for Police 85.70 136 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 4177 Uline Inc 171162409 4 Bollard Sleeves - Library 301.94 137 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 24108 Light Bulbs - Fire Station #63 99.90 138 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 24109 Returned Light Bulbs - Fire Station #63 (99.90) Page 8 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 139 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25231 12 Rolls Duct Tape & Door Foam - PW 131.86 140 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25246 Returned Duct Tape - PW (99.90) 141 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25247 4 Cans Spray Adhesive - PW 62.64 142 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25811 4 Lampholders - Police Station 15.46 143 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25864 Struts, Drill, Tape, Blank, Washers, Nuts - PW 410.15 144 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25870 3 Screw-In Connectors - Police Station 6.65 145 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25884 Trim Fuel & Door Lever - Police Station 41.95 146 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26063 Raceway, Fireblocks, Tapcons, Etc. - City Hall 64.45 147 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26205 Drywall, Metal Studs, Corner L-Beads, Metal Tracks - City Hall 258.05 148 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26223 Framing Screws - City Hall 13.58 149 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 2626104 Box Covers & Extensions - City Hall Media Studio 15.54 150 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26269 Conduit, Brackets, Mudrings, Switch Plates, Etc. - City Hall 311.07 151 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26286 Insulation - City Hall 47.17 152 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26287 Metal Wheels - City Hall 30.47 153 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26359 Toggle Switch - City Hall 3.75 154 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 26664 Lighting Wire & Breaker 62.66 155 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 8283 Banner Plumbing Supply Company LLC 2995926 2 Wax Rings - City Hall 5.94 156 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 8244 Des Plaines Ace Hardware 4889 Caulk - City Hall 8.99 157 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 8244 Des Plaines Ace Hardware 4905 Acetone, Paint Roller, Paint Tray - Library 22.46 158 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 8244 Des Plaines Ace Hardware 4912 Paint Brush, Rollers, Sealant, Paint Trays - Library 38.63 159 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 5021409 Shims, Fast Dry, Power Grab, Boards, Etc. - Police Temp Door 234.68 160 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 5021412 2x4 Wood - Police Temp Door 9.84 161 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1047 Home Depot Credit Svcs 6077656 Door Trim Supplies - City Hall 4th Floor 238.41 162 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1527 Sherwin-Williams Company, The 8838-5 2 Gallons Paint - Library 109.90 163 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 2313 City Electric Supply Company (CES) DEP/066893 Flagpole Light Replacement - City Hall 1,089.00 164 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 2313 City Electric Supply Company (CES) DEP/067012 Occupancy Sensor - PW 233.24 165 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 2313 City Electric Supply Company (CES) DEP/067127 8 LED Bulbs - Police Station 77.92 166 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 2313 City Electric Supply Company (CES) DEP/067161 Sensor - PW Building 5 116.62 Page 9 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 167 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 1208 Steiner Electric Company S007468364.001 Floor Box - City Hall Room 101 859.66 168 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 5969 Security Equipment Supply Inc W71901 Door System Reader - PW 132.48 169 7045 Supplies - Building R&M 5969 Security Equipment Supply Inc W77092 Access Control Latches - City Hall 216.50 170 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0169072100- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 102.46 171 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0459113083- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/11-11/09/2023 10,915.78 172 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0801154263- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 24.83 173 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2685017085- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 182.47 174 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4974385007- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/06-11/06/2023 24.63 175 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4974507003- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 426.46 176 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310485089- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 46.11 177 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310487056- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 149.91 178 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310488160- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 23.49 179 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310489194- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 23.49 180 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310490044- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 27.10 181 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310491292- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 23.49 182 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310492075- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 23.49 183 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310494104- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 23.49 184 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310495085- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 81.55 185 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310649010- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 118.13 186 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310666020- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 968.36 187 7145 Water/Sewer 1031 Des Plaines, City of 71110082-3 11/23 Utility Service - 1460 Miner - 10/02- 11/02/2023 121.50 188 7320 Equipment < $5,000 1057 Menard Incorporated 25244 2 Heaters & Batteries - City Hall 321.97 115,172.83 189 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 133.84 190 6040 Waste Hauling & Debris Removal 2214 Liberty Tire Recycling 2620952 48 Tires Recycled - 11/11/2023 170.12 191 6135 Rentals 1029 Cintas Corporation 4173875984 Mechanic's Uniform Rental - 11/14/2023 298.37 192 6135 Rentals 1029 Cintas Corporation 4174100133 Mechanic's Uniform Rental - 11/15/2023 236.74 Total 535 - Facilities & Grounds Maintenance Division: 540 - Vehicle Maintenance Page 10 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 193 6135 Rentals 1029 Cintas Corporation 4174777321 Mechanic's Uniform Rental - 11/21/2023 236.74 194 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8481 Linde Gas & Equipment Inc 39575180 Cylinder Rental - 10/20-11/20/2023 1,070.84 195 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 1660 Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 93123444 Service Solvent Tank 11/22/2023 - PW Shop 318.77 196 6305 R&M Equipment 6598 Cummins Inc F2-22163 Generator Service & Load Bank Test - PW 5129 - 10/04/2023 1,457.75 197 6310 R&M Vehicles 2626 Alpha Prime Communications 119257 2-Way Radio Installations - 5 Units - 11/15/2023 2,120.00 198 6310 R&M Vehicles 2626 Alpha Prime Communications 119320 Update 2-Way Radios - PW Stock - 11/14/2023 100.00 199 6310 R&M Vehicles 1739 Morton Grove Automotive Inc 61836 Siren Motor Rebuild - Fire 7607 - 11/28/2023 285.00 200 6310 R&M Vehicles 1643 Golf Mill Ford 897519 Rear Suspension Repair - Police 6902 - 11/15-11/17/2023 113.20 201 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5616393-0 Tape, Calendars, Copy Paper, Ink - PW 30.15 202 7030 Supplies - Tools & Hardware 8751 Gornik, Piotr Reimb Tool 2023 Tool Reimbursement for 2023 500.00 203 7030 Supplies - Tools & Hardware 2025 Dahlgren, John Reimb Tool 2023 Tool Reimbursement for 2023 500.00 204 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 1670 Arlington Power Equipment Inc 177304 2 Filters - PW 5149 26.18 205 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878547 2 Brake Lines - PW 5097 15.40 206 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878793 Brake Fluid - PW 5097 16.88 207 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878837 Brake Line & Fittings - PW 5097 6.73 208 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878896 3 Brake Lines & Fluid - PW 5097 36.65 209 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878946 Battery & Core Deposit - PW 5106 143.37 210 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879112 Air Filter, Fuel Filter, Fluid Filter - PW 5033 77.12 211 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 880139 Batteries & Core Deposits - PW 5086 198.22 212 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1677 Wholesale Direct Inc 000266162 Wiper Blades, Back Up Alarm, & D Rings - PW Stock 615.41 213 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1053 Kimball Midwest 101626605 Brass Fittings, Electrical Connectors, Heat Shrink 455.63 214 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1053 Kimball Midwest 101627256 Aerosol Can, Wheel Weights, Hardware, Etc. 589.15 215 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1053 Kimball Midwest 101629087 Sand Paper & Electrical Tape 316.12 216 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 4280 Rush Truck Centers of Illinois Inc 3034754399 Cam Sensor - PW 5080 170.00 217 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 6224 Bumper to Bumper 408-1354920 Starter - Police 6921 238.99 218 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8244 Des Plaines Ace Hardware 4932 Battery - PW 2037 6.29 219 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1643 Golf Mill Ford 563513P Coolant Hose - Police 6103 67.34 220 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878532 3 Batteries & Cores - Fire 7607 537.96 Page 11 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 221 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878570 Core Deposits Returned - Fire 7607 (81.00) 222 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878942 Brake Light Switch - Police 6068 36.28 223 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878993 Aerosol Paint - PW Stock 97.12 224 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 878998 Core Deposits Returned - PW Stock (156.54) 225 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879223 3 Batteries, 3 Cores, 2 Air Filters - PW Stock 486.60 226 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879258 Core Deposits Returned - PW Stock (54.00) 227 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879341 2 Oil Filters - Fire 7801 29.78 228 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879742 Battery, Core Deposit, Filters, & Beams - PW Stock 246.72 229 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 879807 Core Deposit Returned - PW Stock (18.00) 230 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8104 MacQueen Emergency Group P25608 3 Heat Shields - Fire 7607 1,247.03 231 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 1525 Hastings Air-Energy Control Inc PS-I0004410 Plymovent Hose 1,320.12 232 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 5035 Northwest Trucks Inc X101139304:01 Sensor, Shocks, & Cable - PW 7707 & PW Stock 1,031.97 15,275.04 290,057.12 233 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 184.20 184.20 234 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 2,124.30 235 7200 Other Supplies 1244 Ray O'Herron Company Inc 2307517 Sabre MK3 (10), Safety Wand (5), Tie Bar (1) 199.95 236 7200 Other Supplies 2509 Lynn Peavey Co 405273 Evidence Bags, Envelopes, Tape, Scale Cards, and Rules 361.65 237 7300 Uniforms 1489 JG Uniforms Inc 123652 Embroidery for New CSO Shirt 60.00 238 7300 Uniforms 1244 Ray O'Herron Company Inc 2307517 Sabre MK3 (10), Safety Wand (5), Tie Bar (1) 32.95 2,778.85 239 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 1,006.33 240 7500 Postage & Parcel 1041 Federal Express 8-325-54796 Delivery Service 11/16-11/17/2023 9.76 1,016.09 241 6000 Professional Services 5975 Aero Removals Trisons Inc 21088CR125 Removal and Transport of 3 Deceased July 2023 1,200.00 Division: 100 - Administration Total 100 - Administration Division: 610 - Uniformed Patrol Total 610 - Uniformed Patrol Total 540 - Vehicle Maintenance Total 50 - Public Works & Engineering Police Department Division: 620 - Criminal Investigation Total 620 - Criminal Investigation Division: 630 - Support Services Page 12 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 242 6015 Communication Services 1265 NIPAS Northern Illinois Police Alarm Sys 15184 Language Line October 2023 102.50 243 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 444.18 244 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 8566 Andy Frain Services Inc 347961 2023 Crossing Guard Services 10/1- 10/31/2023 R-52-23 41,614.96 43,361.64 47,340.78 245 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 394.62 246 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 93.68 247 8010 Furniture & Fixtures 4177 Uline Inc 171227236 Furniture for 4th Floor Administration Offices 13,620.61 14,108.91 248 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 1,054.01 249 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 828.27 250 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 (27.48) 251 6035 Dispatch Services 5067 Regional Emergency Dispatch Center 164-23-12 R-141-13 Monthly Dispatch Service December 2023 66,587.00 252 6035 Dispatch Services 5067 Regional Emergency Dispatch Center STARCOM-22 R-141-13 Monthly Dispatch Service (Starcom Radio Fee) Dec. 2023 437.00 253 6195 Miscellaneous Contractual Services 7779 FNX Coyote LLC 20231110A Retirement Plaque Engraving 11/10/2023 - Lieutenant 55.00 254 6305 R&M Equipment 1118 Chicago Communications LLC 348353 Repair of Engine 61 Radio 11/02/23 1,041.92 255 7025 Supplies - Custodial 1043 WW Grainger Inc 9908631733 6 Cases Paper Towels, 1 Classifier Kit 186.52 256 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 2626 Alpha Prime Communications 119187 1 Remote Head, 2 Cables, Control Head, Microphone 635.66 257 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 2626 Alpha Prime Communications 119236 2 Remote Heads, 6 Cables, 2 Microphones, 2 Control Heads 1,271.32 258 7200 Other Supplies 1080 Air One Equipment Inc 199613 Pails of Foam and Accessories 2,488.59 259 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 22728338 112323 22 - 24 Packs of Water for Fire Vehicles 232.64 260 7200 Other Supplies 1147 Zoll Medical Corp 3853061 4 Ft Cable, SP02 Sensor 1,476.00 261 7200 Other Supplies 1147 Zoll Medical Corp 3855541 3 Patient Cables 885.60 262 7200 Other Supplies 8979 EcoSolutions Inc 60123834 13 Quick Seal Putty 404.09 263 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116336 Badge - Paramedic 65.00 264 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116429 Badge - Paramedic 65.00 265 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116555 1 Pant, 2 Shorts, Boots - Paramedic 237.00 Total 630 - Support Services Total 60 - Police Department Fire Department Division: 100 - Administration Total 100 - Administration Division: 710 - Emergency Services Page 13 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 266 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116656 Boots - Paramedic 129.00 267 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116733 2 Pants - Engineer 152.00 268 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 118184 Badge - Paramedic 65.00 269 7320 Equipment < $5,000 1609 Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc 1028073 Razor Blade Scraper, 2 Organizers 15.27 270 7320 Equipment < $5,000 1148 WS Darley & Co 17514265 20 Suspenders 1,200.16 271 7320 Equipment < $5,000 1080 Air One Equipment Inc 199613 Pails of Foam and Accessories 4,134.21 272 7320 Equipment < $5,000 1080 Air One Equipment Inc CR198418 Inv 198418 Pd in Error - This is to Take Credit Back (317.00) 83,301.78 273 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 248.86 274 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 54.96 303.82 275 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 93.53 276 6300 R&M Software 1124 Braniff Communications Inc 0035096 Siren Software Annual Subscription- 01/01/2024-12/31/2024 5,460.00 277 7200 Other Supplies 1046 Hinckley Spring Water Co 2533573 111023 Water Delivery Services 10/12 & 11/09/2023 85.94 278 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 115396 Job Shirt - EMA 66.00 279 7300 Uniforms 3212 On Time Embroidery Inc 116674 4 Shirts, Cap, Belt, 1 Pant - EMA 286.00 5,991.47 103,705.98 280 5310 Membership Dues 1573 IL Fire & Police Commissioners Assoc 03079 2024 Membership Dues - City Wide 400.00 281 5340 Pre-Employment Testing 1320 IL State Police 20231001755 Fingerprint Background Check Services - Oct 2023 28.25 282 6000 Professional Services 8905 Kentech Consulting Inc 13972 1 Character and Background Investigation Service-11/16/23 987.50 1,415.75 283 6030 AMB Fee Processing Services 3640 Andres Medical Billing Ltd 112023DPIL Collection Services Oct 2023 - Ambulance Fees 10,736.25 284 6140 Leases 3827 Pitney Bowes Inc 3106405222 Mailing Machine Lease 09/30- 12/29/2023 1,209.72 11,945.97 2,144,649.46 Division: 720 - Fire Prevention Total 720 - Fire Prevention Division: 730 - Emergency Management Agency Total 710 - Emergency Services Total 75 - Fire & Police Commission Department: 90 - Overhead Total 90 - Overhead Total 730 - Emergency Management Agency Total 70 - Fire Department Department: 75 - Fire & Police Commission Total 100 - General Fund Page 14 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 285 6330 R&M Traffic Signals 1206 Illinois, State of 64067 R-136-22 Traffic Signal Maintenance 07/01-09/30/2023 21,828.25 286 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0193753007- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/06-11/06/2023 88.43 287 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0392121005- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 212.37 288 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0445091056- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 522.69 289 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0725000037- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/04-11/02/2023 55.30 290 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1273119011- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/04-11/02/2023 4,255.58 291 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1521117181- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 381.88 292 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2493112068- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 46.16 293 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2607132134- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/02-10/31/2023 436.66 294 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2644104014- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/02-10/31/2023 380.81 295 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2901166089- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 922.49 296 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2943015087- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/19-10/18/2023 16,344.92 297 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3471079047- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 57.04 298 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 6045062008- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 117.19 45,649.77 299 6005 Legal Fees 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15277 11-23 Non-Retainer IEMA & FEMA Review Phase 5 1,862.00 1,862.00 1,862.00 300 8005 Computer Hardware 1035 Dell Marketing LP 10709884285+2 18 Dell Mobile Precision Laptops- Invest Dept (1 Inv, 2 Credits) 18,541.26 18,541.26 301 7300 Uniforms 1164 Uniform Den East Inc 87788 Helix Brand Level II Ballistic Vest (1 New Officer) 668.25 302 7300 Uniforms 1164 Uniform Den East Inc 87789 Helix Brand Level II Ballistic Vest (1 New Officer) 668.25 1,336.50 19,877.76 Fund: 250 - Grant Projects Fund Program: 2520 - Capital Grants Total 2520 - Capital Grants Total 250 - Grant Projects Fund Fund: 230 - Motor Fuel Tax Fund Total 230 - Motor Fuel Tax Fund Program: 2620 - DEA Total 2620 - DEA Total 260 - Asset Seizure Fund Fund: 260 - Asset Seizure Fund Program: 2610 - Customs Total 2610 - Customs Page 15 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 303 6000 Professional Services 1394 Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc 5452.102-1 TO #2 Thacker/Westgate Ped. Crossing Eng Svcs 10/02-10/29/23 3,650.00 304 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 233.64 305 8100 Improvements 1281 Des Plaines Park District Arndt SW- 001 2023 Arndt Park Sidewalk Installation 07/01-10/31/23-City Share 17,500.00 21,383.64 306 8015 Equipment 1202 Standard Equipment Co U01102 Sidewalk Replace/Floor Sweeper #5022 - 11/20/2023, R-64-23 63,535.79 63,535.79 307 8005 Computer Hardware 1035 Dell Marketing LP 10714458010 2 Dell Precision 5680 Laptops 5,485.10 5,485.10 308 6000 Professional Services 7661 FGM Architects Inc 20-2890.02-7A TO#4 CH/PD Construction Admin - 08/26-09/29/2023, R-49-23 12,925.00 309 6000 Professional Services 7661 FGM Architects Inc 20-2890.02-8 TO#4 CH/PD Const Admin - 09/30- 10/27/2023, R-49-23 51,700.00 310 6000 Professional Services 7661 FGM Architects Inc 20-2890.03-3 TO#3 PD Add Furniture Design - 09/30-10/27/2023, R-214-22 2,257.00 311 6000 Professional Services 7661 FGM Architects Inc 23-3789.01-1 TO#1 Lintel Replace - FS #61 - 05/27- 06/30/2023, R-214-22 14,552.23 312 6000 Professional Services 7661 FGM Architects Inc 23-3869.01-1 TO#13 Boiler Design Services - PW - 07/29-08/25/2023, R-116-19 17,536.45 313 6000 Professional Services 1112 Architectural Consulting Group LTD C23-467 TO#4 Building Exterior Assessment - PW - 10/24-11/14/2023, 7,100.00 314 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 8826 Chem-Wise Pest Management 1209493 Pest Control - Leela Building - 11/16/2023 50.00 315 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7371 Gilco Scaffolding Company LLC 17900 Scaffold Debris Chute Rental - Leela Building - 10/17-11/13/2023 700.00 316 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7371 Gilco Scaffolding Company LLC 17901 Upper Level Debris Chute Rental - Leela Bldg - 10/17-11/13/2023 100.00 317 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7506 Otto Baum Company Inc 23-20-027-P1 Facade Rehabilitation - Library - 09/01-10/31/2023, R-140-23 37,765.31 318 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 7506 Otto Baum Company Inc 23-20-027-RET-F Facade Rehab P2/Final - Library - 11/01-11/30/2023, R-140-23 4,196.15 319 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 8772 Helm Service CHI193869 HVAC Repair - 608 Lee - 11/05/2023 1,005.00 320 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 8772 Helm Service CHI194062 HVAC Repair - 608 Lee - 11/19/2023 642.66 321 7045 R&M Buildings & Structures 1057 Menard Incorporated 25875 Toilet Line - Leela Building 5.29 322 8100 Improvements 7713 Camosy Incorporated PDAddition P#8 CH/PD Link & PD Add & Reno P8- 11/01-11/30/2023, R-55-23 723,790.00 874,325.09 Fund: 420 - IT Replacement Fund Total 420 - IT Replacement Fund Fund: 430 - Facilities Replacement Fund Fund: 400 - Capital Projects Fund Total 400 - Capital Projects Fund Fund: 410 - Equipment Replacement Fund Total 410 - Equipment Replacement Fund Total 430 - Facilities Replacement Fund Page 16 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 323 4601 New Construction - Sale of Water 3772 Rivers Casino Refund 11/17/23 Hydrant Meter Refund 11/17/2023 (137.04) (137.04) 324 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 42.30 42.30 325 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 824.37 326 6040 Waste Hauling & Debris Removal 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 092923 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 09/11-09/13/2023, R-194-23 16,575.00 327 6040 Waste Hauling & Debris Removal 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 103123 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 10/10-10/19/2023, R-194-23 31,851.00 328 6335 R&M Water Distribution System 1355 MQ Construction Company 11-15-23-1 Emergency Water Repairs - 11/5- 11/11/2023, R-162-23 & R-193-23 2,028.92 329 6335 R&M Water Distribution System 1355 MQ Construction Company 11-22-23-1 Water Main Repairs - 11/12- 11/18/2023, R-162-23 & R-193-23 64,005.47 330 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5616393-0 Tape, Calendars, Copy Paper, Ink - PW 30.15 331 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 1057 Menard Incorporated 25238 6 Tie Downs 74.10 332 7035 Supplies - Equipment R&M 1154 West Side Tractor Sales W15337 4 Fuel Filters - PW 9063 209.84 333 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 8454 NAPA Auto Parts 880050 Filters, Battery, & Core - PW 9059 328.33 334 7040 Supplies - Vehicle R&M 5823 Interstate Power Systems Inc C042069747:01 2 Filters - PW 9059 75.97 335 7050 Supplies - Streetscape 1057 Menard Incorporated 25949 Red Lava Rock for Parkway Repair 107.88 336 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 092923 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 09/11-09/13/2023, R-194-23 6,549.18 337 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 103123 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 10/10-10/19/2023, R-194-23 16,572.89 338 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1328 John Neri Construction Company Inc 111723 Agg Materials & Spoils Disposal - 10/31-11/02/2023, R-194-23 14,803.22 339 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1162 Vollmar Clay Products Inc 189152 Valve Vaults, T&G Sections, Concentric Cones, Solid Bottoms 3,468.00 340 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1057 Menard Incorporated 23890 Teflon Tap, Nipples, Bushings, Etc.21.65 341 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1057 Menard Incorporated 24441 Brass Nipples, Ball Valves, Batteries, Ziplocs, Elbows 79.27 342 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 1057 Menard Incorporated 26009 20 Bags Red Lava Rock 179.80 343 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 3530 Mid-American Water 265321W Wall Socket Set, Hose Adapter, Pressure Gauge, Etc. 3,411.00 Total 000 - Non Divisional Division: 510 - Engineering Total 510 - Engineering Fund: 500 - Water/Sewer Fund Non Departmental Division: 000 - Non Divisional Division: 550 - Water Systems Page 17 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 344 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 3530 Mid-American Water 265324W 3 Hydrant Extensions 3,555.00 345 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 3530 Mid-American Water 265691W 10 Corp Stops 1,580.00 346 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 3530 Mid-American Water 265813W 4 Hymax Couplings 1,308.00 347 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 3530 Mid-American Water 265814W 24 Hymax Couplings 7,848.00 348 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T738655 32 Saddles - 10/18/2023, R-161-23 5,348.42 349 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T807025 Pipes, Gaskets, Corps, Etc., R-161-23 17,674.40 350 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T869453 Megalugs, Gaskets, T-Heads, Bolts, Etc., R-161-23 22,230.92 351 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T897385 Pipes, Megalugs, Gaskets, T-Heads, Nuts, Etc. 1,678.50 352 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T947180 36 Water Meters & 81 Smart Points 19,485.00 353 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T980505 10 Couplings 500.00 354 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T985246 4 Hymax Couplings & 4 Plugs 1,900.00 355 7070 Supplies - Water System Maintenance 6992 Core & Main LP T991483 4 Hymax Couplings 1,982.00 356 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0718079040- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 58.53 357 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 11/23 Electricity Service 05/03-06/02/2023 185.11 358 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 1123A Electricity Service 06/02-07/03/2023 197.61 359 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 1123B Electricity Service 07/03-08/02/2023 151.18 360 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 1123C Electricity Service 08/02-08/31/2023 264.34 361 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 1123D Electricity Service 08/31-10/02/2023 253.47 362 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 1602149012- 1123E Electricity Service 10/02-10/31/2023 209.92 363 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2382141015- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 41.53 364 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2902009038- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 173.53 365 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3526170000- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 57.56 366 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4436122006- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/11-11/09/2023 7,180.24 367 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5646761001- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 23.74 368 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 6152054027- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/02-10/31/2023 12,818.37 267,901.41 369 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 627.37 Total 550 - Water Systems Division: 560 - Sewer Systems Page 18 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 370 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5613246-0 Pens & Post It Notes 59.12 371 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5616393-0 Tape, Calendars, Copy Paper, Ink - PW 30.15 372 7020 Supplies - Safety 8809 USABluebook INV00091747 Ear Plugs, Hook Mount, Roller Assembly, Probe 99.90 373 7030 Supplies - Tools & Hardware 8809 USABluebook INV00091747 Ear Plugs, Hook Mount, Roller Assembly, Probe 92.95 374 7030 Supplies - Tools & Hardware 8809 USABluebook INV00093757 Insulated Probe 92.95 375 7030 Supplies - Tools & Hardware 8809 USABluebook INV00102145 Stainless Steel Probe & Insulated Probe 305.75 376 7075 Supplies - Sewer System Maintenance 1437 Des Plaines Material & Supply LLC 559955 T-Cone Plug & Hydraulic Cement 79.97 377 7075 Supplies - Sewer System Maintenance 5214 State Industrial Products 903122343 Block Worx Grease Control - Sewer 660.00 378 7075 Supplies - Sewer System Maintenance 8809 USABluebook INV00091747 Ear Plugs, Hook Mount, Roller Assembly, Probe 569.43 379 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0096017042- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 995.58 380 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0575134020- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 63.96 381 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0640144010- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 35.58 382 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0762050019- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/04-11/02/2023 22.59 383 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2038128006- 1023A Electricity Service 10/02-10/30/2023 62.15 384 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2148094073- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/04-11/03/2023 58.17 385 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3240002012- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/23-11/21/2023 732.18 386 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3461136053- 1023A Electricity Service 10/02-10/30/2023 32.41 387 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3526009006- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 79.86 388 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3657136067- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 79.92 389 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 3773008060- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 45.68 390 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4995025051- 1023A Electricity Service 10/02-10/30/2023 27.51 391 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5060090016- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/04-11/02/2023 110.94 392 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5814097012- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 28.84 393 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 6331089024- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 137.35 394 7300 Uniforms 2067 Cutler Workwear PS-INV027001 2 Pairs Boots - Quartermaster Stock 179.95 395 7320 Equipment < $5,000 4640 Albany Steel & Brass Corporation 149920 3 Ductile Iron Blades & 2 Belt Pulley Kits 725.91 6,036.17Total 560 - Sewer Systems Page 19 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 396 6000 Professional Services 2506 Trotter & Associates Inc 22439 TO#5 Water Main Improvements - 09/25-10/27/2023, R-197-23 33,663.00 397 6000 Professional Services 1606 Dixon Engineering Inc 23-1287 TO#10 Engineering Services - Dulles Tank - 10/01/2023, R-41-20 5,000.00 398 6000 Professional Services 8074 Thomas Group Solutions LLC 23DPTO15 TO#15 Water Loss Mitigation Services - 04/01-07/01/2023, R-9-20 23,500.00 399 6000 Professional Services 8074 Thomas Group Solutions LLC 23DPTO16 TO#16 Water Loss Mitigation Services - 08/24-10/24/2023, R-9-20 24,500.00 400 8100 Improvements 8756 Flowserve US Inc 1233990 Pump Replacements - Maple PS - 09/05/2023 21,255.75 107,918.75 381,761.59 401 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 65.95 402 6025 Administrative Services 7961 BridgePay Network Solutions LLC 1192311 Utility Web, Business License Trans & EnerGov Fees Oct 2023 291.70 403 6025 Administrative Services 7615 Sebis Direct Inc 79193 Utility Bill Rendering Services-Drop Date 11/15/2023 1,741.53 404 6110 Printing Services 2016 Signarama 44254 Nameplate for Sr Utility Billing Clerk 11/10/2023 28.45 405 7000 Office Supplies 1644 Warehouse Direct Inc 5618651-0 4 Cartons of Copy Paper 244.40 2,372.03 384,133.62 406 6025 Administrative Services 7960 Passport Labs Inc INV-1041738 Mobile Pay Parking Transaction Fee for Oct 2023 58.83 407 6315 R&M Buildings & Structures 4923 J Gill & Company 2632 Maintenance Repairs Parking Decks P2-10/07-11/07/2023, R-144-23 101,502.00 408 6320 R&M Parking Lots 1728 Total Parking Solutions Inc 106573 Parking Machine Repairs - 11/20/2023 150.00 409 6320 R&M Parking Lots 2350 Anderson Elevator Co INV-80105-Y0V1 Elevator Repairs - Library Deck - 11/16/2023 879.00 410 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 0354464001- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 1,982.15 411 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 2239082030- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 757.42 412 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4722388001- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 19.55 413 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 4791127023- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 2,145.80 414 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5310303000- 11/23 Electricity Service 10/03-11/01/2023 264.88 107,759.63 Division: 580 - CIP - Water/Sewer Total 580 - CIP - Water/Sewer Total 00 - Non Departmental Fund: 510 - City Owned Parking Fund Total 510 - City Owned Parking Fund Department: 30 - Finance Total 30 - Finance Total 500 - Water/Sewer Fund Page 20 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account 415 6015 Communication Services 1552 Verizon Wireless 9949222944 Communication Services 10/14- 11/13/2023 72.02 416 6025 Administrative Services 7960 Passport Labs Inc INV-1041738 Mobile Pay Parking Transaction Fee for Oct 2023 703.37 417 7140 Electricity 1033 ComEd 5222730006- 10/23 Electricity Service 09/29-10/30/2023 119.92 895.31 418 6005 Legal Fees 1127 Clark Baird Smith LLP 17630 Legal Fees - Labor & Employment Matters 11/01-11/18/2023 330.00 330.00 419 2464 Hydrant Deposits 3772 Rivers Casino Refund 11/17/23 Hydrant Meter Refund 11/17/2023 1,100.00 420 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15282 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 150.00 421 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15283 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 172.00 422 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15284 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 410.00 423 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15285 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 1,903.50 424 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15286 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 774.00 425 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15287 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 301.00 426 2493 Escrow - CED Development 8133 Elrod Friedman LLP 15302 11-23 Reimb Redevelopment 150.00 4,960.50 3,674,847.68 Fund: 520 - Metra Leased Parking Fund Fund: 700 - Escrow Fund Total 700 - Escrow Fund Grand Total Total 520 - Metra Leased Parking Fund Fund: 600 - Risk Management Fund Total 600 - Risk Management Fund Page 21 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount 427 4160 Real Estate Transfer Tax 8984 Georgieva, Plamena Refund 11/29/23 Real Estate Transfer Stamp Refund #69322 630.00 428 4160 Real Estate Transfer Tax 8985 Virgil Hirtopeanu & Mihaela Pogacean Refund 11/29/23 Real Estate Transfer Stamp Refund #69099 750.00 429 4400 Building Permits 8981 US Quality Fences Refund 11/30/23 Refund for Double Payment on Inv 00000108 50.00 430 4400 Building Permits 8982 Chavez Concrete Refund 11/30/23 Refund for Double Payment on Inv 00000630 100.00 431 4400 Building Permits 8983 Abraham, Gina Refund 11/30/23 Refund for Double Payment on Inv 00001741 50.00 432 4400 Building Permits 8986 Biestek, Agnieszka Refund 11/30/23 Refund for Double Payment on Inv 00000371 50.00 433 4400 Building Permits 3394 Peterson Roofing Inc Refund 11/30/23 Refund for Double Payment on Inv 00000923 50.00 434 4631 Nonresident Ambulance Fees 8882 Jimenez, Matthew DPIL-2241271:1 R Medical Reimbursement DOS 09/15/2022 105.00 1,785.00 435 7110 Natural Gas 1064 Nicor 11/10/23 X465297 Natural Gas Service 10/12- 11/09/2023 490.30 436 7110 Natural Gas 1064 Nicor 11/10/23 X532457 Natural Gas Service 10/12- 11/09/2023 49.83 437 7110 Natural Gas 1064 Nicor 11/13/23 X451619 Natural Gas Service 10/12- 11/09/2023 200.13 740.26 740.26 438 6015 Communication Services 1032 Comcast 11/18/2023 x6724 Internet/Cable Service Dec 2023 105.50 105.50 439 6015 Communication Services 1032 Comcast 11/06/2023 x7069 Internet/Cable Service 11/10- 12/09/2023 114.90 114.90 220.40 City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account Fund: 100 - General Fund Department: 00 - Non Departmental Manual Payments Total 00 - Non Departmental Public Works & Engineering Division: 535 - Facilities & Grounds Maintenance Total 535 - Facilities & Grounds Maintenance Total 50 - Public Works & Engineering Police Department Division: 610 - Uniformed Patrol Total 610 - Uniformed Patrol Division: 630 - Support Services Total 630 - Support Services Total 60 - Police Department Page 22 of 24 Line #Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Account Manual Payments 440 6015 Communication Services 1032 Comcast 11/22/2023 x6716 Internet/Cable Service Dec 2023 63.30 63.30 63.30 441 6015 Communication Services 1032 Comcast 11/20/2023 x6732 Internet/Cable Service Dec 2023 63.30 442 6015 Communication Services 1032 Comcast 187566413-8482 Internet/Cable Service 11/15- 12/14/2023 1,575.00 443 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 661.37 444 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 407.41 445 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 98.00 446 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 370.00 447 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 370.00 448 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 591.00 449 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 795.00 450 6015 Communication Services 8622 RCN Telecom Services LLC 41208850100165 62 Internet/Cable Service 11/21- 12/20/2023 500.00 5,431.08 8,240.04 8,240.04 Fire Department Division: 730 - Emergency Management Agency Total 730 - Emergency Management Agency Grand Total Total 100 - General Fund Total 70 - Fire Department Department: 90 - Overhead Total 90 - Overhead Page 23 of 24 Amount Transfer Date Automated Accounts Payable 3,674,847.68$ **12/18/2023 Manual Checks 8,240.04$ **12/1/2023 Payroll 1,538,939.42$ 12/1/2023 Electronic Transfer Activity: JPMorgan Chase Credit Card -$ Chicago Water Bill ACH -$ Postage Meter Direct Debits 18,000.00$ *11/24/2023 Utility Billing Refunds 722.28$ 11/28/2023 Debt Interest Payment 2,720,275.00$ 11/29/2023 IMRF Payments 96,778.18$ 12/5/2023 Employee Medical Trust 675,354.99$ 12/1/2023 Total Cash Disbursements:8,733,157.59$ * Multiple transfers processed on and/or before date shown ** See attached report Adopted by the City Council of Des Plaines This Eighteenth Day of December 2023 Ayes ______ Nays _______ Absent _______ Jessica M. Mastalski, City Clerk Andrew Goczkowski, Mayor City of Des Plaines Warrant Register 12/18/2023 Summary RHS Payout Page 24 of 24 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: November 30, 2023 To: Michael G. Bartholomew, City Manager From: Emily Shaw, MPA, Management Analyst Ryan N. Johnson, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development Subject: Support and Consent to Class 6b Renewal – 2150 Oxford Road (5th Ward) Issue: Applicant 710 West Grant Avenue LLC is the owner of 2150 Oxford Road and is requesting renewal of a Cook County Property Tax Class 6b incentive. Class 6b incentives are intended to encourage industrial investment by reducing the assessment level of eligible properties for 12 years, and the incentive may be renewed once. Local support for the initial incentive was approved in 2012 (R-114-12). Analysis: The subject property is approximately 1.4 acres and contains an approximately 25,000-square-foot building. The initial incentive reduced the assessment level from the typical 25 percent to 10 percent for 10 years. The assessment is in its twelfth year, so it is at the 20 percent assessment level. The applicant has one business that occupies the subject property. V. Formusa Co. utilizes the facility to process, package, warehouse and distribute Italian food products under the Marconi label. Currently V. Formusa employs 19 employees. The City’s policy for supporting 6b renewals is that there should be a 33 percent increase in the number of full-time employees. V. Formusa has plans to hire at least eight full-time employees, which would exceed the 33 percent requirement. If the renewal is granted the applicant pledges approximately $374,000 in physical improvements to the property. The pledged improvements include asphalt work for $71,000, fire protection work for $6,000, interior concrete work for $13,000, concrete sidewalk repairs for $10,000, sewer drain work for $5,000, bollards for $11,000, restroom upgrades for $7,000, interior lighting upgrades for $30,000, electrical upgrades for $136,936, floor work for $35,000, and fire sprinkler work for $30,000. The total improvements meet the City’s standard 6b expectation of $10 per square foot ($14.95 per square foot). The attached application contains a sheet highlighting the 12-year tax scenarios. Scenario 1 projects the property tax bills with improvements, occupancy, and the approval of the 6b incentive. The applicant claims Scenario 2 is not possible because improvements and occupancy would not occur but for the incentive. The projections are based on the pledged property improvements, as well as triennial reassessments of properties in Maine Township. The applicant is assuming that all other things being equal, taxes will climb with each reassessment. Further, the applicant asserts that unless the 6b is renewed, the reinvestment in the property or sustainability of the tenant business will not be viable. MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 70 NEW BUSINESS #2A. Property Tax Scenarios Over the 12-Year Renewal Period 1. Estimated taxes with a 6b renewal, improvements, and continued full occupancy: $514,902 2. Estimated taxes without a 6b renewal, but with improvements, and continued full occupancy: $1,007,130 3. Estimated taxes without 6b renewal, improvements, and full vacancy: $312,990 If the renewal is not granted, the assessment level would return to the full 25 percent in the next year. If granted, the renewal would lead to a 10 percent assessment level through Tax Year 2032 (Calendar Year 2031). City Council Action: Based on the application, the Council may choose to approve or deny Resolution R- 242-23 supporting and consenting to a Class 6b renewal for 2150 Oxford Road. Attachments Attachment 1: Class 6b Property Tax Incentive Application Resolution R-242-23 Exhibit A: Legal Description Page 2 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 70 EXHIBIT H The request to project the taxes is speculative based on the actions of Assessor. Based on the 10% factor an analysis might be as follows: Year With Exemption Without Exemption Vacant (Land Only) 2022 Base Year $32,164 $73,183 $15,338 2023 $33,817 $74,836 $16,991 2024 $35,470 $76,489 $18,644 2025 $37,123 $78,142 $20,297 2026 $38,776 $79,795 $21,950 2027 $40,429 $81,448 $23,603 2028 $42,082 $83,101 $25,256 2029 $43,735 $84,754 $26,909 2030 $45,388 $86,407 $28,562 2031 $47,041 $88,060 $30,215 2032 $48,694 $89,713 $31,868 2033 $50,347 $91,366 $33,521 2034 $52,000 $93,019 $35,174 TOTAL $514,902 $1,007,130 $312,990 2022 is based on the current bills. The calculations are computed by the figures in the tax bill and the assessor’s website. 2023 thru 2034 are simply the increase of $1,653.00, which is a rounded average of the increase in taxes on the subject property from 2013 to 2021 according to the Cook County Treasurer’s website. The above chart is purely speculative. Attachment 1 Page 5 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 15 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 16 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 17 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 18 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 20 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 21 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 22 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 23 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 24 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 25 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 26 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 27 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 28 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 29 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 31 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 32 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 33 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 34 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 35 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 36 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 37 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 38 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 39 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 40 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 42 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 43 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 44 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 45 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 46 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 47 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 49 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 50 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 51 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 52 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 53 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 54 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 55 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 56 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 57 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 58 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 59 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 60 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 61 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 62 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 63 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 64 of 70 Attachment 1 Page 65 of 70 Our products-Found everywhere •Major Grocers •Independent and local Grocery Chains •C-Store Foodservice AND Retail Applications •Independent Quick Service and Fine Dining Restaurants •Multi Unit Quick-Service Chain and Franchise Restaurants •Bulk Ingredients for Food Packers/Manufacturers •Service, Correctional, and Institutional Facilities V.Formusa Co., Inc www.marconi-foods.com Taste the Difference • c-,.,, (E) � " MARCONI 'b"� BRAND FOODS ��., !UNCS' 189-t, T Our Giardiniera-A cut above The Salt content of our blends are half as much as other mixes available In addition to the less salty flavor, this enables a firmer and more bold colored product Our proprietary carrots are grown with a smaller core, giving the customer a sweeter more tender bite Our blend have no Olives. Our experience has taught us more people appreciate an olive-free blend than one with olives. Jeff Johnson jjohnson@marconi-foods.com 847-813-6040 Attachment 1Page 66 of 70 1 CITY OF DES PLAINES RESOLUTION R - 242 - 23 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AND CONSENTING TO RENEWAL OF CLASS 6b CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2150 OXFORD ROAD._________ WHEREAS, 710 West Grand Avenue LLC ("Applicant") is the owner of that certain property commonly known as 2150 Oxford Road in the City and legally described in Exhibit A attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this Resolution ("Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property consists of approximately 1.4 acres and is improved with a building ("Building") with a gross area of approximately 25,000 square feet ("Facility"); and WHEREAS, in 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution R-114-12 supporting and consenting to Class 6b classification of the Subject Property under the Cook County Real Property Assessment Classification Ordinance ("Classification Ordinance"), and the Subject Property was classified as Class 6b under Cook County Control Number 62524 ("6b Classification"); and WHEREAS, the Facility, which had been vacant, was subsequently occupied after the Cook County activation of the 6b Classification occurring in 2012; and WHEREAS, the current 6b Classification will expire at the end of 2023; and WHEREAS, V.Formusa Co. (“Occupant”) occupies, and plans to continue occupy, the facility for the purpose of processing, packaging, warehousing, and distributing Italian food products under the Marconi label (“Current Use”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Classification Ordinance, the Assessor will not grant the 6b Renewal unless the City Council adopts a resolution: (i) finding that industrial use of the Subject Property is necessary and beneficial to the local economy; and (ii) expressing the City Council's support for and consent to the 6b Renewal; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that the City Council adopt a such a resolution; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has pledged improvements to Subject Property in an anticipated total value of $373,633, or $14.94 per square foot of the Facility, over the life of the renewal ("Property Improvements"), which includes asphalt work, fire protection work, interior concrete work, concrete sidewalk repairs, sewer drain work, bollards, restroom upgrades, interior lighting upgrades, electrical upgrades, floor work, and fire sprinkler work; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that supporting and consenting to the 6b Renewal will: (i) induce the Applicant to construct the Proposed Improvements; (ii) reduce the likelihood that the Subject Property will become abandoned and unproductive; (iii) preserve and Page 67 of 70 2 increase employment opportunities within the City; (iv) help to stabilize the property tax base and maintain the current level of real estate taxes generated by the Subject Property; and (v) serve the best interest of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Des Plaines, Cook County, Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the City Council. SECTION 2: DETERMINATION OF CONTINUED ELIGIBILITY AND APPROPRIATENESS. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the continued industrial use of the Subject Property is necessary and beneficial to the local economy. SECTION 3: SUPPORT AND CONSENT TO 6B RENEWAL. Pursuant to the Classification Ordinance, the City Council hereby supports and consents to the 6b Renewal for the Subject Property, subject to the conditions set forth in Section 4 of this Ordinance; provided, however, that the City Council does not consent to renewal of the Class 6b Classification of the Subject Property for a period longer than twelve years after the effective date of the 6b Renewal. SECTION 4: CONDITIONS OF CITY’S CONSENT; REVOCATION. The consent granted in Section 3 of this Resolution is expressly conditioned upon the occurrence and/or satisfaction by the Applicant of the following conditions: A. The Applicant will complete construction of the Property Improvements with a value of no less than $373,633 no later than December 31, 2026; B. The Applicant will provide evidence, upon any request by the City that the Tenant is employing at least nine full-time workers at the Subject Property by December 31, 2025. The Applicant agrees and acknowledges that if Condition A as set forth in this Section 4 is not met on or before December 31, 2026, or if Condition B is not met on or before December 31, 2025, the City Council shall have the option, in its sole and exclusive discretion, to revoke the consent granted in Section 3 by resolution duly adopted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 74-73 of the Cook County Code of Ordinances. In the event the City Council revokes its consent, the City Clerk is directed to promptly deliver notice of such revocation to the Board of Commissioners of Cook County and the Office of the Cook County Assessor along with certified copies of the revoking resolution. SECTION 5: DELIVERY. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Applicant. The Applicant is responsible for filing such certified copy with the Assessor. SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval according to law. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Page 68 of 70 3 PASSED this _____ day of ____________, 2023. APPROVED this _____ day of _____________, 2023. VOTE: AYES _____ NAYS _____ ABSENT _____ MAYOR ATTEST: Approved as to form: CITY CLERK Peter M. Friedman, General Counsel DP-Resolution Supporting Class 6b Classification Renewal for 2150 Oxford Road Page 69 of 70 4 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY THE NORTH 216.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 432.0 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF), OF THAT PART OF THE WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF J. EMIL ANDERSON’S WOLF-TOLL ROAD SUBDIVISION, OF PART OF THE WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 30, AFORESAID, LYING SAID WEST OF LINE 916 FEET WEST OF AND PARALELL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST ½ AND LYING EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE DES PLAINES VALLEY RAILROAD (NOW CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY) IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Commonly known as 2150 Oxford Road, Des Plaines, Illinois PINs: 09-30-400-020-0000 Page 70 of 70