The URL can be used to link to this page

2020.03.10 PZ&B Meeting Packet Community & Economic Development 1420 Miner Street, Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5392 | W: desplaines.org Planning and Zoning Board Agenda March 10, 2020 Room 102 – 7:00 P.M. Call to Order: Roll Call: Approval of Minutes: February 25, 2020 Public Comment: For matters that are not on the Agenda Public Hearing: Old Business: New Business: 1. Address: 720 Garland Place Case Number: 20-004-V The petitioner is requesting a Standard Variation under Section 12-3-6(H) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Code, as amended, to allow for an addition onto an existing detached garage that is located less than five-feet from the side property line in the R-1 zoning district at 720 Garland Place, and approval of any other such variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PIN: 09-16-306-013-0000 Petitioner: Kazimierz Swierczek, 720 Garland Place, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Owner: Kazimierz Swierczek, 720 Garland Place, Des Plaines, IL 60016 2. Address: 614 Birchwood Avenue Case Number: 20-007-FSUB The petitioner is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision under Section 13-2 of the Des Plaines Subdivision Regulations to subdivide the lot at 614 Birchwood Avenue into two separate lots in the R-1 zoning district, and approval of any other such variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PIN: 09-30-401-013-0000 Petitioner: Andrzej L. Bednarczyk, 12S355 Lemont Road, Lemont, IL 60439 Owner: Irene Heldak, 1176 West Grant Drive, Des Plaines, IL 60016 3. Address: 2282 Eastview Drive Case Number: 20-009-FSUB The petitioner is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision under Section 13-2 of the Des Plaines Subdivision Regulations to subdivide the lot at 2282 Eastview Drive into two separate lots in the R-1 zoning district, and approval of any other such variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PIN: 09-29-302-039-0000 Petitioner: Andrzej L. Bednarczyk, 12S355 Lemont Road, Lemont, IL 60439 Owner: Eugeniusz Boronski, 2282 Eastview Drive, Des Plaines, IL 60018 Adjournment: Next Agenda – March 24, 2020 City of Des Plaines, in compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in the meeting(s) or have questions about the meeting(s) or facilities, contact the ADA Coordinator at 847-391-5486 to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for these persons. The public hearing may be continued to a further date, time and place without publication of a further published notice such as this notice. Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 1 DES PLAINES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 2020 MINUTES The Des Plaines Planning and Zoning Board Meeting held its regularly-scheduled meeting on Tuesday, February 25, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in Room 101 of the Des Plaines Civic Center. ZONING BOARD Chairman Szabo called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and read this evening’s cases. Roll call was established. PRESENT: Bader, Fowler, Hofherr, Saletnik, Szabo, & Veremis ABSENT: Catalano ALSO PRESENT: Patrick Ainsworth, Coord., Devel. Mgr./Community & Economic Development Jonathan Stytz, Planner/Community & Economic Development Wendy Bednarz/Recording Secretary A quorum was present. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no Public Comment. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Board Member Hofherr, seconded by Board Member Fowler, to approve the minutes of February 11, 2020. AYES: Hofherr, Fowler, Bader, Saletnik, Szabo, & Veremis NAYES: None ***MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY*** Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 2 NEW BUSINESS 1. Address: 1732-1736 E. Oakton Street Case Number: 20-005-CU The petitioner is requesting the following items: (i) a Conditional Use under Section 12-3-4 for a Trade Contractor Use in the C-3, General Commercial District; (ii) a Major Variation for off street parking under Section 12-3-6 of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended; and (iii) approval of any other such variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PINs: 09-21-312-015-0000 Petitioner: Ted Karabatsos, 7033 Jonquil Terrace, Niles, IL 60714 Owner: Dexi Karabatsos, 7033 Jonquil Terrace, Niles, IL 60714 Chairman Szabo swore in Ted Karabatos of 7033 Jonquil Terrance, Niles, IL. Mr. Karabatos provided an overview of his request. Mr. Karabatos stated that the building would primarily be used as a warehouse for storage of sheet metal and roofing supplies. Mr. Karabatos is moving his warehouse from Bensenville where he has been for seven years, prior to the Bensenville location he was in Chicago. Board Member Hofherr inquired about the size of Mr. Karabatos vehicles and width of the driveway. The petitioner stated that the driveway is shared and he has no issue maneuvering his vehicles. Board Member Fowler asked if the petitioner has alley access, he does not. Board Member Saletnik asked about sheet metal fabrication inside the building. Mr. Karabatos stated that gutters would be fabricated inside the building, but bigger items would be site delivered. The building would primarily be used as equipment storage. Chairman Szabo asked if the Board has any questions. There were none. He asked that the Staff Report be given which Planner Stytz did: Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use under Section 12-7-3(F)(3) and a Major Variation under Section 12-9-7 of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow for a trade contractor use in the C-3 zoning district and reduce the amount of required off-street parking from 27 to 10 spaces at 1730-1736 Oakton Street. Analysis: Address: 1730-1736 E. Oakton Street Owner: Dexi Karabatsos, 7033 Jonquil Terrace, Niles, IL 60714 Petitioner: Ted Karabatsos, 7033 Jonquil Terrace, Niles, IL 60714 Case Number: 20-005-CU Real Estate Index Number: 09-21-312-015-000 Ward: #2, Alderman Colt Moylan Existing Zoning: C-3, General Commercial Existing Land Use: Commercial Mixed-Use Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 3 Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1, Single-Family Residential District South: C-3, General Commercial District East: C-3, General Commercial District West: C-3, General Commercial District Surrounding Land Use: North: Single Family Residences South: Commercial East: Commercial West: Commercial Street Classification: Oakton Street is an arterial street. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Lower Density Urban Mix with Residential. Project Description: The petitioner, Ted Karabatsos, has requested a Conditional Use Permit to operate a trade contractor use in the C-3, General Commercial district and Major Variation for to reduce the amount of required off- street parking from 27 to 10 spaces at 1730-1736 E. Oakton Street. The petitioner represents a roofing and sheet metal company called Valdex Construction that purchased the property with the intent of occupying the warehouse space in the back. The proposed use is classified as a trade contractor use, which requires a Conditional Use Permit in the C-3 General Commercial District. The existing two-story, 8,606- square foot building is made up of three tenant spaces on the ground floor and two apartments on the second floor. The two apartments on the second floor of the building are located at 1732 E. Oakton Street. On the ground floor at the front of the building, the first tenant space at 1730 E. Oakton Street has been occupied by State Farm since 2004 and the second tenant space at 1734 E. Oakton Street is vacant. The subject space at 1736 E. Oakton Street is located at the rear of building on the ground floor and is where the petitioner proposes to operate the trade contractor use. The subject space was last occupied by an auto body repair use, which left in 2011. The existing 4,694-square foot tenant space currently contains an office, restroom, storage area, and 3,982-square foot garage/warehouse area with two garage doors, which encompasses a majority of the ground level of the building. Valdex Construction does not have set hours of operation at their office as all work is done off the property at respective job sites. The company employs up to twelve employees during the peak season, but only a few of these employees would be on-site briefly during the day to pick up equipment. The petitioner plans to store up to two company vehicles and equipment inside the building. See the Project Narrative for more information regarding the proposed business. The petitioner does not plan to make any alterations to the space or the building with the exception of adding four off-street parking spaces as shown on the Floor Plan. Since the existing building consists of residential, retail establishment, and service establishment uses, the following parking requirements apply pursuant to Section 12-9-7 of the Zoning Ordinance: • Multiple Family dwellings require a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit; • Retail establishments require one parking space for every 250-square feet of gross floor area; and • Service establishments require one parking space for every 250-square feet of gross floor area. Thus, a total of 27 parking spaces are required on the property. Given the unique shape of the property and the small existing six-space parking lot, the petitioner has added four parking spaces inside of the Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 4 garage/warehouse space as shown on the Site Plan (Attachment 5). However, a parking variation is required for the remaining 17 parking spaces as this property was constructed prior to modern parking standards. The parking variation is a formality to allow the trade contractor to re-occupy part of the first floor. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed project, including the proposed the site improvements, address various goals and objectives of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan including the following aspects: • Future Land Use Plan: o This property is designated as Lower Density Urban Mix with Residential on the Future Land Use Plan. The Future Land Use Plan strives to create a well-balanced development area with a variety of mixed-use developments with commercial and residential uses along prominent corridors throughout Des Plaines. o The subject property contains a multi-unit building with a mix of residential and commercial uses that is in line with the type of development proposed for major commercial corridors within Des Plaines. All activities and items stored will be conducted inside to reduce any negative impacts. • Landscaping and Screening: o The Comprehensive Plan seeks to encourage and actively pursue beautification opportunities and efforts, including the installation of landscaping, street furniture, lighting, and other amenities, to establish a more attractive shopping environment and achieve stronger corridor identity in Des Plaines. o The proposal seeks to add landscaping along the rear property line to help soften the transition from the mixed-use building and the single-family residences behind it. This property currently does not contain any landscaping so the proposal will seek to add landscaping where possible on the site. o The proposal also includes a new 8-foot solid, opaque view screen fence to abut the parking spaces along the rear property line to further buffer and improve the aesthetics of the property. While the aforementioned aspects represent a small portion of the goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan, there is a large emphasis on improving existing commercial developments and enhancing commercial corridors throughout Des Plaines. Compliance with the Oakton Street/Elmhurst Road Corridor Study The proposed project, including the proposed the site improvements, addresses some goals and objectives of the 2009 Oakton Street/Elmhurst Road Corridor Study: • Oakton Mixed Use District: o The Oakton Street/Elmhurst Road Corridor Study seeks to create a strong pedestrian environment and focal point for the community and re-establish this area as a prime location to live, work, and play. Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 5 o The subject property is located within the Oakton Mixed Use District and currently contains mixed-use development. While the petitioner currently has no plans to alter the building, there are plans to occupy a vacant tenant space within the existing building to add a new use in the Oakton Mixed Use district. o The proposal also looks to add landscaping and screening where possible on the property to increase corridor beautification. Conditional Use Findings: Conditional Use requests are subject to the standards set forth in Section 12-3- 4(E) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. In reviewing these standards, staff has the following comments: 1. The proposed Conditional Use is in fact a Conditional Use established within the specific Zoning district involved: Comment: A Trade Contractor use is a Conditional Use, as specified in Section 12-7-3(K) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, for properties in the C-3 General Commercial District. 2. The proposed Conditional Use is in accordance with the objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan: Comment: The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Lower Density Urban Mix with Residential. The Comprehensive Plan strives to foster growth and redevelopment of mixed-use commercial corridors to provide a wide variety of uses in close proximity to residential developments. This property is positioned along the Oakton Street commercial corridor near single-family residences. The proposal provides another service use for residents in this area and retains the variety of uses within the existing building. 3. The proposed Conditional Use is designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity: Comment: The subject property currently consists of residential and commercial uses and is developed in a way that is harmonious and consistent with surrounding commercial development. The petitioner proposes to revitalize a vacant tenant space/warehouse in the building for a roofing and sheet metal business. However, the petitioner does not purpose to alter the footprint of the existing building. A majority of the business operations will take place off property at respective job sites, but the petitioner plans to primarily utilize the building for storage of vehicles/equipment and to review blueprints. Materials utilized for each job are direct shipped from the distributors to the job site. The petitioner plans to store two company vehicles on the site at a given time. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is not hazardous or disturbing to existing neighboring uses: Comment: The proposed roofing and sheet metal business will be contained within the walls of the existing building as all activities are conducted either within the garage/warehouse area or off the property on various job sites. The petitioner plans to utilize the warehouse space for storage purposes and for additional parking for the building tenants so as not to create a hazardous or distributing effect on the surrounding development. The footprint, height, and appearance of the existing building will remain the same. However, the interior of the building will be renovated to suit the needs of Valdex Construction. The trade contractor use is consistent with and complementary to other commercial Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 6 uses in the area. A majority of the activities will take place inside of the building and landscaping and screening will be enhanced on the north property line to reduce potential impact. 5. The proposed Conditional Use is to be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or, agencies responsible for establishing the Conditional Use shall provide adequately any such services: Comment: The existing mixed-use building is adequately served by essential public facilities and services. The proposed trade contractor use will also be adequately served by essential public facilities and services. 6. The proposed Conditional Use does not create excessive additional requirements at public expense for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic well-being of the entire community: Comment: The existing mixed-use building does not create a burden on public facilities or is not a detriment to the economic well-being of the community. There is no anticipated increase in demand for public facilities as a result of the Conditional Use Permit for a trade contractor use. 7. The proposed Conditional Use does not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glare or odors: Comment: The proposed trade contractor use is not anticipated to create additional traffic compared to the existing mixed-use building as a majority of all business activities occur off the property at individual jobs sites and the space will be predominately utilized for storage of materials and equipment. There are no concerns that the proposed use will generate excessive traffic, noise, smoke fumes, glare, or odors. 8. The proposed Conditional Use provides vehicular access to the property designed so that it does not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares: Comment: The proposed trade contractor use will not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. There will be no changes to the existing access point onto the property from Oakton Street that is currently utilized by the existing mixed-use building. 9. The proposed Conditional Use does not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of natural, scenic, or historic features of major importance: Comment: The proposed trade contractor use would not cause the destruction, loss, or damage of any natural, scenic or historic features of major importance. The building and site were already developed for the use of a multi-tenant, mixed-use building. The petitioner plans to add landscaping and screening to improve the aesthetics of the property. 10. The proposed Conditional Use complies with all additional regulations in the Zoning Ordinance specific to the Conditional Use requested: Comment: The proposed trade contractor use meets all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the C-3 General Commercial District with the exception of a variation for off-street parking. The existing property does not permit the number of parking spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance for Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 7 each use currently occupying the building. However, the petitioner is working with staff to add additional parking spaces where possible to minimize the parking variation. Variation Findings: Variation requests are subject to the standards set forth in Section 12-3-6(H) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 1. Hardship: No variation shall be granted pursuant to this subsection H unless the applicant shall establish that carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this title would create a particular hardship or a practical difficulty. Comment: Carrying out the strict letter of this title would create a particular hardship for the petitioner given that there is limited space available for off-street parking on the subject property. The property’s current development and configuration do not provide adequate room to accommodate the required number of parking spaces. The petitioner is proposing to add four parking spaces inside the existing garage/warehouse space to accommodate additional parking spaces, but will be unable to fully comply with the parking requirements. The property was constructed prior to modern parking standards, which leads to a practical difficulty in order to re-occupy this space. 2. Unique Physical Condition: The subject lot is exceptional as compared to other lots subject to the same provision by reason of a unique physical condition, including presence of an existing use, structure, or sign, whether conforming or nonconforming; irregular or substandard shape or size; exceptional topographical features; or other extraordinary physical conditions peculiar to and inherent in the subject lot that amount to more than a mere inconvenience to the owner and that relate to or arise out of the lot rather than the personal situation of the current owner of the lot. Comment: The subject property’s location and size limit the petitioner from adding more parking on site to meet the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance as the site is land-locked by other commercial development. The property is narrow and shallow in size and is developed with a large multi-tenant, mixed-use building—these characteristics limit the available room to provide the required number of parking spaces. The allowance of the parking variance would assist in reducing the physical constraints of the subject property. The building was built at a time prior to modern off-street parking requirements. The petitioner is adding four parking spaces inside the building to reduce the non-conforming parking count. 3. Not Self-Created: The aforesaid unique physical condition is not the result of any action or inaction of the owner or its predecessors in title and existed at the time of the enactment of the provisions from which a variance is sought or was created by natural forces or was the result of governmental action, other than the adoption of this title. Comment: The existing hardship was not created by the petitioner or building owner and cannot be corrected without the approval of the requested variations. 4. Denied Substantial Rights: The carrying out of the strict letter of the provision from which a variance is sought would deprive the owner of the subject lot of substantial rights commonly enjoyed by owners of other lots subject to the same provision. Comment: The property owner may be denied the right to locate the proposed roofing and sheet metal business or to effectively utilize the subject property without the approval of the requested variance. The narrow and shallow shape of the property limit the space for off-street parking in accordance with all Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 8 regulations. Without the approval of the parking variation at this location, it could make it difficult for the property owner to make improvements to the property or individual tenants to grow their uses. 5. Not Merely Special Privilege: The alleged hardship or difficulty is neither merely the inability of the owner or occupant to enjoy some special privilege or additional right not available to owners or occupants of other lots subject to the same provision, nor merely the inability of the owner to make more money from the use of the subject lot. Comment: The granting of this variation would not provide the property owner with any special privilege or right that is not already enjoyed by similar commercial businesses within this zoning district and is not sought to provide the property owner with economic gain. Other commercial properties surrounding the subject property are similar in size and shape and often do not have adequate parking areas to accommodate each use. 6. Title And Plan Purposes: The variation would not result in a use or development of the subject lot that would be not in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which this title and the provision from which a variation is sought were enacted or the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive plan. Comment: The proposed parking variation would be in harmony with the general purposes of this title and would be compatible with the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive plan. The petitioner plans to maintain the existing multi-tenant, mixed-use building—consisting of both residential and commercial uses—in line with the Lower Density Urban Mix with Residential land use designated for the subject property within the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal includes the addition of four parking spaces inside the building to increase off-street parking on the site for the existing tenants within the building. 7. No Other Remedy: There is no means other than the requested variation by which the alleged hardship or difficulty can be avoided or remedied to a degree sufficient to permit a reasonable use of the subject lot. Comment: The granting of the variation is the only remedy to the existing off-street parking space deficiency on the subject property without creating additional hardship for the petitioner. There is not adequate room on the site to accommodate all required parking spaces. 8. Minimum Required: The requested variation is the minimum measure of relief necessary to alleviate the alleged hardship or difficulty presented by the strict application of this title. Comment: The granting of the variation is the minimum relief necessary to alleviate the hardship for the petitioner. The petitioner wishes to maintain the existing building and configuration of the property as is, with the exception of the proposed off-street parking spaces, to address the required parking requirements as much as possible. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a trade contractor use and a parking variation at 1730-1736 E. Oakton Street, based on a review of the information presented by the applicant and the findings made above, as specified in Section 12-3-4(E) (Standards for Conditional Uses) and Section 12-3-6(G) (Standards for Variations) of the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following conditions: 1. All flammable liquids and oily rags must be stored in a metal UL (Underwriters Laboratories) Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 9 listed fire cabinet. The location of all proposed flammable liquid/oily rag storage on site will be required at time of permit. 2. That the existing wood fence along the rear property line in between the parking area and the single-family residences is replaced with an eight-foot solid, opaque view screen fence in compliance with all applicable codes. 3. That a minimum of two four-foot long landscape planter boxes are installed along the front of the building and are populated with perennials. 4. That all appropriate building permit documents and fire-rated separation details are submitted as necessary depending on the use classification of the proposed space. All permit documents shall be sealed and signed by a design professional licensed in the State of Illinois and must comply with all City of Des Plaines building codes. 5. No outside storage of materials and supplies is allowed on the property. 6. No sheet metal fabrication is allowed on site. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Section 12-3-4(D) (Procedure for Review and Decision for Conditional Uses) and Section 12-3-6(G) (Procedure for Review and Decision for Major Variations) of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned conditional use for a trade contractor use at 1730-1736 E. Oakton Street. The City Council has final authority on the proposal. Chairman Szabo asked if the Board has any questions. There were none. He asked if anyone in the audience is in favor of this petition or against it. No one responded. Board Member Saletnik asked if Petitioner is aware of the conditions. The Petitioner advised that they were, but was concerned about the installation of the fence due to weather conditions. Coordinator Ainsworth clarified the condition stating that the Petitioner has one year from City Council approval to obtain the necessary permits for conditions associated with the conditional use. A motion was made by Board Member Bader, seconded by Board Member Hofherr, to approve as presented. AYES: Bader, Hofherr, Fowler, Szabo, Saletnik & Veremis NAYES: None Coordinator Ainsworth stated that this item would be on the March 16th City Council meeting agenda. The petitioner’s attendance is required. ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY *** Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 10 2. Address: 150 N. East River Road Case Number: 20-002-LASR CU The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use for a Localized Alternative Sign Regulation for the existing Planned Unit Development as per Ordinances Z-11-17 and Z-25-19 for a sign plan and approval of any other such variations, waivers, and zoning relief as may be necessary. PINs: 09-09-402-009-0000; -010; -012 Petitioner: Paul Langdon, 8301 Maryland Avenue, Suite 350, Clayton, MO 63105 Owner: Vanguard Des Plaines Apartments, LP and First American Properties, LLC, 8301 Maryland Avenue, Suite 350, Clayton, MO 63105 Staff is respectfully requesting the Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) to open the public hearing at the February 25, 2020 meeting and continue the case to the March 24, 2020 PZB Meeting as the petitioner has had delays and needs additional time to finalize their application and materials. A motion was made by Board Member Saletnik, seconded by Board Member Fowler, to continue this case to the March 24, 2020 Planning & Zoning Board Meeting. AYES: Hofherr, Fowler, Bader, Szabo, Saletnik & Veremis NAYES: None ***MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY *** Case 20-005-CU 1730-1736 E Oakton Conditional Use Case 20-002-CU 150 N East River Rd Conditional Use February 25, 2020 Page 11 STAFF UPDATES Coordinator Ainsworth provided the following updates: 1. Coordinator Ainsworth apologized for the continuation of Case 20-002, 150 N East River Road. The goal is to have at least two cases but not more than four on each agenda to respect everyone’s time. 2. Planning & Zoning Board meeting schedule and designated time off. The Board previously discussed a summer schedule with limited meeting dates in summer. The Tuesday, May 26th meeting will be canceled since Coordinator Ainsworth will be out of town for a conference. A second date in July/August will also be cancelled based on the consensus of the group. Please make Coordinator Ainsworth aware of your preference for meeting cancellation. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting is scheduled for March 10, 2020. Chairman Szabo adjourned the meeting by voice vote at 7:18 p.m. Sincerely, Wendy Bednarz, Recording Secretary cc: City Officials, Aldermen, Zoning Board of Appeals, Petitioners COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: March 3, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Jonathan Stytz, Planner Cc: Patrick Ainsworth, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator Subject: Consideration of Variance Request to Allow an Addition to an Existing Detached Garage That Does Not Meet the Setback Requirements for Accessory Structures at 720 Garland Place (1st Ward) Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Standard Variation under Section 12-8-1(C) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to allow for a 240-square foot addition to an existing detached garage that does not meet the minimum five-foot setback requirement for the side property lines in the R-1 zoning district. Analysis: Address: 720 Garland Place Owner: Kazimierz Swierczek, 720 Garland Place, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Petitioner: Kazimierz Swierczek, 720 Garland Place, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Case Number: 20-004-V PIN: 09-16-306-013 Ward: #1, Alderman Mark Lysakowski Existing Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential District Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1, Single Family Residential District South: R-1, Single Family Residential District East: R-1, Single-Family Residential District West: C-2, Limited Office Commercial District / M-2, General Manufacturing District Surrounding Land Use: North: Single Family Residence MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 14 South: Single Family Residence East: Single Family Residence West: Wheels, Inc. (Commercial) / Precision Instruments (Manufacturing) Street Classification: Garland Place is classified as a local street. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Single-Family Residential. Project Description: The petitioner, Kazimierz Swierczek, is requesting a Standard Variation to allow for a 240-square foot addition to an existing 480-square foot detached garage that does not meet the minimum five-foot setback requirement for the side property lines in the R-1 zoning district at 720 Garland Place. This 0.32- acre, 70-foot wide property contains a two-story residence with a patio, private walks, 480-square foot detached garage accessed from the street, asphalt driveway, and three sheds located in a row behind the detached garage as shown in the Plat of Survey (Attachment 3). The shed closest to the detached garage is 64-square feet in area, the middle shed is 80-square feet in area, and the farthest shed away from the detached garage is 140-square feet in area. Staff notified the petitioner that two of the three sheds would need to be removed as part of the variation request to comply with Section 12-8-1(C) of the Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner has been working with code enforcement since May 22, 2019 to reduce the number of accessory structures on the property and address existing property violations. The petitioner is requesting the 240-square foot addition to increase storage space in the garage and reduce the need for additional accessory structures on the property. The petitioner aspires to construct the proposed 20-foot wide by 12-foot deep addition on the back of and flush with the existing detached garage without any changes to access as shown in the Site Plan (Attachment 4). The proposal would increase the size of the existing detached garage to 680-square feet in area and eliminate the 64-square foot and 80-square foot sheds at the rear of the property. The existing detached garage and the proposed addition will be positioned 3.45-feet away from the north (side) property line and in excess of 5-feet from the south (side) and west (rear) property lines. The proposed addition would match the design and height of the existing detached garage as noted in the Architectural Drawings (Attachment 5). The petitioner does not propose to make any alterations to the property aside from the detached garage addition and removal of two sheds. The petitioner is proposing to remove two of the three sheds on the property in order to meet the maximum two accessory structure regulation. However, the petitioner’s request to allow for a detached garage that is located less than five- feet from the side property lines for accessory structures in Des Plaines constitutes the need for a standard variation to Section 12-8-1(C) of the 1998 Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed project, including the proposed the site improvements, address various goals and objectives of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan including the following aspects: • Future Land Use Plan: Page 2 of 14 o The property is marked for the Single Family Residential land use. The Future Land Use Plan strives to create a well-balanced development area with a healthy mixture of commercial and residential uses. The petitioner strives to make functional and aesthetic improvements to the existing property in an effort to maintain practical storage options and to reduce uncovered storage on the property. o The proposal allows the petitioner to reallocate storage area and reduce the number of accessory structures on the property to address existing property violations and concerns. While the aforementioned aspects represent a small portion of the goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan, there is a large emphasis on encouraging reinvestment in residential properties in order to enhance the residential corridors throughout Des Plaines and to increase the quality of life for residents. Variation Findings: Variation requests are subject to the standards set forth in Section 12-3-6(H) of the 1998 City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 1. Hardship: No variation shall be granted pursuant to this subsection H unless the applicant shall establish that carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this title would create a particular hardship or a practical difficulty. Comment: The physical constraints of the property’s current configuration prevent the petitioner from complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The existing detached garage was constructed less than 5-feet from the side property line. Requiring the petitioner to relocate the existing detached garage or the proposed detached garage addition could create a financial and physical hardship for the petitioner. 2. Unique Physical Condition: The subject lot is exceptional as compared to other lots subject to the same provision by reason of a unique physical condition, including presence of an existing use, structure, or sign, whether conforming or nonconforming; irregular or substandard shape or size; exceptional topographical features; or other extraordinary physical conditions peculiar to and inherent in the subject lot that amount to more than a mere inconvenience to the owner and that relate to or arise out of the lot rather than the personal situation of the current owner of the lot. Comment: The unique size and shape of this property create a particular hardship for the petitioner. While the property is 70-feet wide, the existing residence and driveway configuration limit the optimal locations for a detached garage and detached garage addition making it difficult for the petitioner to comply with all applicable zoning regulations. The petitioner has proposed the detached garage addition size and location in an effort to reduce the number of accessory structures on the site and meet all regulations for accessory structures in the Zoning Ordinance as possible. 3. Not Self-Created: The aforesaid unique physical condition is not the result of any action or inaction of the owner or its predecessors in title and existed at the time of the enactment of the provisions from which a variance is sought or was created by natural forces or was the result of governmental action, other than the adoption of this title. Comment: The size and shape of the property have not changed due to any action of the petitioner. The unique physical constraints of the property are unavoidable due to the fact that the property is land-locked. 4. Denied Substantial Rights: The carrying out of the strict letter of the provision from which a variance is sought would deprive the owner of the subject lot of substantial rights commonly enjoyed by owners of other lots subject to the same provision. Comment: Carrying out of the strict letter of the Zoning Ordinance would not allow the petitioner to make improvements to his property and provide adequate covered storage on the site. The available Page 3 of 14 space on the property for a detached garage in conformance to the Zoning Ordinance denies the owner substantial rights commonly enjoyed by owners of surrounding lots under the same provision. 5. Not Merely Special Privilege: The alleged hardship or difficulty is neither merely the inability of the owner or occupant to enjoy some special privilege or additional right not available to owners or occupants of other lots subject to the same provision, nor merely the inability of the owner to make more money from the use of the subject lot. Comment: The approval of this variation would not provide the petitioner with any special privilege or additional right not available to owners or occupants of surrounding lots under the same provision. The proposal would allow the petitioner to make improvements to an existing property by increasing covered storage area inside the existing detached garage and reducing the number of separate accessory structures on the site. 6. Title And Plan Purposes: The variation would not result in a use or development of the subject lot that would be not in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which this title and the provision from which a variation is sought were enacted or the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive plan. Comment: The approval of this variation would result in the construction of an addition to an existing detached garage that would be in harmony with the general and specific purposes of this title and meet all other zoning regulations. It would also encourage reinvestment and retention of single-family neighborhoods, which the Comprehensive Plan strives to accomplish. 7. No Other Remedy: There is no means other than the requested variation by which the alleged hardship or difficulty can be avoided or remedied to a degree sufficient to permit a reasonable use of the subject lot. Comment: There is no means other than the requested variation that the alleged hardship or difficulty can be avoided given the current physical orientation of the property. The location of the existing detached garage does not conform to the required setback regulations and prevents the petitioner from conforming to all regulations for accessory structures in the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Minimum Required: The requested variation is the minimum measure of relief necessary to alleviate the alleged hardship or difficulty presented by the strict application of this title. Comment: The approval of this variation would be the minimum measure of relief for the petitioner to overcome the existing physical hardship on the property, provide additional covered storage area, and reduce the number of accessory structures on site. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variations based on review of the information presented by the applicant and the standards and conditions met by Section 12-3-6(H) (Findings of Fact for Variations) as outlined within the City of Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended, with the following conditions: 1. That no portion of the detached garage overhangs the property line. 2. That no easements are affected or drainage concerns are created with the construction of the detached garage addition and all roof downspouts are directed away from the neighbor to the north. 3. That the 8-foot wide by 8-foot long and 10-foot wide by 8-foot long sheds are removed in compliance with Section 12-8-1(C)(4) within 30 days of hypothetical Planning and Zoning Board approval. 4. All construction with a fire separation distance of less than five-feet is required to comply with the requirements of the 2015 International Residential Code, ‘Section R302 Fire – Resistant Construction.’ The current design requires that the North side of the detached garage structure addition Page 4 of 14 will be required to comply with the fire resistant construction requirements. Please submit all required documentation at time of permit submittal. 5. That all debris shall be removed from the property. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Section 12-3-6(F) of the Zoning Ordinance (Standard Variations), the Planning and Zoning Board has the authority to approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned variance for an addition to an existing detached garage at 720 Garland Place that does not meet the minimum side yard setbacks required for an accessory structure. Attachments: Attachment 1: Petitioner’s Standards for Variation Attachment 2: Location Map Attachment 3: Plat of Survey Attachment 4: Site Plan Attachment 5: Detached Garage Addition Plans and Elevations Attachment 6: Existing Condition Photos Attachment 7: Site Photos Page 5 of 14 .DES 'PIAINES ILLINOIS COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5306 desplaines.org STANDARDS FOR VARIATIONS In order to understand your reasons for requesting a varia tion, please answer the following items com_pletely and thoroughly (two to three sentences each). Variation applicants must demonstrate that special circumstances or unusual conditions prevent them from following the specific regulations of their zoning district. Applicants must prove that the zoning regulations, in combination with the uncommon conditions of the property, prevents them from making any reasonable use of the land. Keep in mind that no variation may be granted that would adversely affect surrounding properties or the general neighborhood. 1.Hardship: No variation shall be granted pursuant to this subsection H unless the applicant shall establish that carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this title would create a particular hardship or a practical difficulty. -Over 16. years of collecting riding mowers and snow blowers for a repair hobby. I need an addition to my existing garage for the maximum of 720 square feet. I need to store items out of sight and inside a structure. I sold my two other properties in Des Plaines and had to downsize. 2.Unique Physical Condition: The subject lot is exceptional as compared to other lots subject to the same provision by reason of a unique physical condition, including presence of an existing use, structure, or sign, whether conforming or nonconforming; irregular or substandard shape or size; exceptional topographical features; or other extraordinary physical conditions peculiar to and inhereht in the subject lot that amount to more than a mere inconvenience to the owner and that relate to or arise out of the lot rather than the personal situation of the current owner of the lot. -This is a very large Residential lot 70 x 200 and it backs up to the water tower property. There is not a lot of neighbors surrounding me. 3.Not Self-Created: The aforesaid unique physical condition is not the result of any action or inaction of the owner or its predecessors in title and existed at the time of the enactment of the provisions from which a variance is sought or was created by natural forces or was the result of governmental action, other than the adoption of this title. -I have the maximum amount of accessory structures on my property and rent storage units. I need to have more space in my garage for storage. Attachment 1 Page 6 of 14 4.Denied Substantial Rights: The carrying out of the strict letter of the provision from which a variance is sought would deprive the owner of the subject lot of substantial rights commonly enjoyed by owners of other lots subject to the same provision. -Code Enforcement is demanding that I put my hobbies inside a structure and not have them in the yard. I was already approved for this variation request in 2005 by the Community and Economic Development Director and financially wasn't able to construct the addition at that time. 5.Not Merely Special Privilege: The alleged hardship or difficulty is neither merely the inability of the owner or occupant to enjoy some special privilege or additional right not available to owners or occupants of other lots subject to the same provision, nor merely the inability of the owner to make more money from the use of the subject lot. -This is a hobby and I repair for friends and family. I don't make any financial gains. 6.Title And Plan Purposes: The variation would not result in a use or development of the subject lot that would be not in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which this title and the provision from which a variation is sought were enacted or the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive plan. -The property will remain Residential and will make my property look a lot better. 7.No Other Remedy: There is no means other than the requested variation by which the alleged hardship or difficulty can be avoided or remedied to a degree sufficient to permit a reasonable use of the subject lot. -No other solution, but to allow me this side yard setback variation of 1.55'. The code already allows for the square footage of 720 s.f that I am requesting. 8.Minimum Required: The requested variation is the minimum measure of relief necessary to alleviate the alleged hardship or difficulty presented by the strict application of this title. -If the variation is approved my property will look a lot better and I will comply with what the Code Enforcement Department is asking me to do. Attachment 1 Page 7 of 14 MapOfficen• J I '-=u --�::----_-_ Miner St ------------ j � I 0.03 mile I __ I �11 inch equals 167 fee I ..J _} k J -Mapcr�t-edon >.ia.rch s.2020. 181:J 720 Garland Place I ._,J ..J ._j Miner s 1 _j ---t ___ , �tt T=l-- ®2020 GISC:00--�tiu.roa.nd MGP blc. All Ri_ghtiR.e--�� Th:eGISCoir:i0rtittt1andMGPinc.creno1lic.blebranyu;Y-miswzmooifimionor�isclmweofanym:.ppro"i�W!d:f2.pplieeblelew. .. /, Di$.Clai::i:er: Thh:m.p h bf g�:m.1 i.l".b::rs.:tion �on ly. Altllough tlle i.l".b::rs.:tion h be.li:ev-ed to be g�:m.lly acrunt-e. errotS::rsay exht and tlleu,-�should i.m1-�W.tlycot'J btaccur, •. cy.The:m.p�notc01'.stirut�aregu.litory�t-er.:ni.l"..ationa.ndhnotab¥>:btengi.n�.ngdoign.AReght-e1-edW.dSutv�-orshouldbe.c01'sult-edto�t-er.:ni.nepr:<.iv. location bo'w!dari�on tlle g't'()'W!d. Attachment 2 Page 8 of 14 A1C..S. . sv-aVEYlN� SER.VIC£. 'U.c: · . 108 LEE lANE -D ··BOUNGBROOK. IWNOIS 60440 PH:630 226-9200 · · FAX:630 226-9234 UJl"111'UJDaEISUIUIDlftllONO,LOT lljeGAIILINDDMSIONOPAPAD'M'l'ID sourini.'5rvc orncitoN ,, 'IVWNSBIP.41 N011111,ILINGI\ D BASTOIITIIE:nmat l'IIINmAl.lll!IIIDLVC,, Dtc:oca.COUJnY.DUNOII. · · . . . � . OJtAvwit �,s· � .. 1£,,,a .9a sa)!W �$. . oso' sOt/l'W Cl{Au./ LIN£ p-�/S" . o.z:o·�F"CJl4/V�I� . L .......... .,. ... ,;.. ....... . o.7s;'�_,.,, I"'• .. · �· ·. ·. . . . · .. ?:; . . � .... • :.:r ·"ft-!•-...-e ...... � ... �cu.�.4·.-.:--.e-.. �•J .. � ... 11-__ "�------�T-cae � �I \J/·1 "· � .. :--.:1: -----;·_,:.:--: ,t;:'-t• . � uA 7 Jt :wJS"· If�::� . �{ ·� .� ' ��rt . C':_sr�. ·. -� lo,··•.: _z_. �· � ��eJ$,s-� u�- �NW ··-· ... -�0· mlE OF IIWlQIS -i'ss �OFWIU. :_..- ·-�.J.,f-;i-� ... •· .• -�: 1· .��:2,�.,-,,..-· z�co· w6oc>� t.:r-o.t;.'!;"�� :.� W. ABSUIM!mltUEIMCE W:.AH IWNOIS ttm.SSIOIIAl.Ol'SIGII l'Utll\, DOREjEBYc:amv'IIIAY...a l'80fmlGNALsmwt« CDNIVUIS Tif'IIIECIJIUIENTIWllClllS l'l1111NUUDNDAIIDS l'GRA 80UNDAllY SU&ftY', AllD 'IIIAT 1IIE �T ��was a analECf IENl!Rilli:AUON OF SAID SURVEY. · · · · · · · • .. · · ·• · . -_ . . . ,.7?( · �YOf'_)ANUARY u .. ·� ATIOIIIICillPOOIC IIWIOIS. �. BtsNoP�� Ir--.. .. • NO. us-: 3of!!lJ UCEIISEDPIRA110II DATC Ncm:Jl\1a30; 2004 IWllOIS IUSUIESS UCDUENO. 114-aNl RDIJIIORXD,\ff · 1.:.... s--o 3 JOH). �9S-68-o3 -------------------------------------------------------------------: ·-·-··--- N: . wA� .. T.··•r'.,, . SC.Id·• zo · l !"""-----�-7 i I ! -i- .1.,i .. ,. ·\Q �-.,� .... -�-·-_.::�. 6b ��-· ... · . \; ::t�. -.� :• '. At t a c h m e n t 3 Pa g e 9 of 14 I _jL ________ ___,,;,.. __ 7 11J�O' .-,, . �· �,- r l I.--.. 11-"-�• l "i .. . I REVISIONI· ./ Attachment 4 Page 10 of 14 :i-------=._-=._-=._=-=--=-=----l==i I � -, I /l,,;',p' --. l..pr.,N� I □-·-.. t·-------·�.\. �-* \ \ I I L-"-- f.-1Kt-H �l',.7!:!&i ( o/t!>, (,(.. �o. \.-jp.U.) I I u i ·1 !.. l +--__ 1/;p'•P__-__ -------t /,I. 1. \I,\ ,,--·,r11/. \C, \ ,,_ __ ,_ f. �-,-.... -- • =-=--\ 1. l It-l ��dn-.l1 ---------,,�� .... ,,..,,.,, ..... Fl �----"'-· I ' 1 I +� I ---'"=-� .. J ..... "�-�-- L1- I .·::_:::·:·_· ··---........ i __ JO, -w-=====-"•-•"•--·-·-- O! \ ·- Attachment 5 Page 11 of 14 A t t a c h m e n t 6 P a g e 1 2 o f 1 4 A t t a c h m e n t 6 P a g e 1 3 o f 1 4 720 Garland Place – Public Notice and Front of Property 720 Garland Place – Shed to Remain at Rear of Property 720 Garland Place – Looking Southwest at Side of Property 720 Garland Place – Rear of Garage and Two Sheds to Be Removed A t t a c h m e n t 7 P a g e 1 4 o f 1 4 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: March 2, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Jonathan Stytz, Planner Cc: Patrick Ainsworth, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator Subject: Consideration of a Final Plat of Subdivision for a Single-Family Residence Development Generally at 614 Birchwood Avenue, Case #20-007-FPLAT (5th Ward) Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision, under Section 13-2 of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Des Plaines Municipal Code, to subdivide one property into two lots of record at 614 Birchwood Avenue. Analysis: Address: 614 Birchwood Avenue Owners: Zenon Heldak, 1176 West Grant Drive, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Petitioner: Andrzej L. Bednarczyk, Geopool Surveying, Inc., 12S355 Lemont Road, Lemont, IL 60439 Case Number: 20-007-SUB Real Estate Index Number: 09-30-401-013-0000 Ward: #5, Alderman Carla Brookman Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Residential District Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1, Single-Family Residential District South: R-1, Single-Family Residential District MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 16 East: R-1, Single-Family Residential District West: R-1, Single-Family Residential District Surrounding Land Use: North: Single-Family Residential South: Single-Family Residential East: Single-Family Residential West: Single-Family Residential Street Classification: Birchwood Avenue is a local street. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential. Project Description: The petitioner, Andrzej L. Bednarczyk on behalf of Zenon Heldak, is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision for the property located at 614 Birchwood Avenue. The subject property is 0.460 acres in size and is comprised of one vacant lot. The frame shed shown near the northwest corner of the property on the Plat of Survey (Attachment 3) has since been removed. This applicant successfully obtained a Tentative Plat of Subdivision approval in 2019 for the same lot configuration. The petitioner proposes to subdivide the 20,041.80-square foot lot into two lots and construct two new single-family homes as shown in the Proposed Site Plan (Attachment 4). Both proposed lots will have a width of 60-feet and an area of 10,020-square feet. There are no variation requests with this application as all proposed lots will meet the 55-foot minimum lot width and 6,875-square foot minimum interior lot area requirements for properties in the R-1, Single-Family Residence district. A Landscape Plan (Attachment 7) has been submitted with the Final Subdivision application. The Landscape Plan entails foundation landscaping for the street-facing elevations of each proposed single-family residence pursuant to the condition of approval imposed by staff. Final Plat of Subdivision Report Name of Subdivision: Heldak’s Subdivision Address: 614 Birchwood Avenue Request: Approval of Final Plat of Subdivision Total Acreage of Subdivision: 0.460 acres Lot Descriptions and Construction Plans: The petitioner’s Final Plat of Subdivision shows the existing 20,041.80-square foot lot being subdivided into two lots each with an area of 10,020-square feet. The Final Plat of Subdivision shows a 10-foot public utility easement and drainage easement at the rear, a 5-foot public utility easement and drainage Page 2 of 16 easement on the sides, and a 25-foot building line in the front of each proposed lot. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan There are several parts of the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan that align with the proposed project. Those portions are follows: • Under Overarching Principles: o The Comprehensive Plan seeks to promote a wider range of housing options and to encourage the reinvestment and preservation of established Des Plaines neighborhoods through the addition of new housing to fit diverse needs. The proposal seeks to reinvest in this vacant lot and provide additional housing options in this established neighborhood. • Under Land Use Plan: o A primary goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance established single-family neighborhoods while also expanding denser housing options. The proposal matches the existing character of the neighborhood and provides new housing options. • Under Future Land Use Map: o The property is marked for Single-Family Residential land uses. These areas are designated for detached single-family residences to maintain and improve housing options for residents. The proposed use will transform an existing vacant residential lot and provide two more single- family housing options for the community as a whole. While the aforementioned bullet points are only a small portion of the Comprehensive Plan, there is a large emphasis on maintaining detached single-family zoning areas and promoting the expansion of these developments to increase housing options for residents. The petitioner is proposing to take a vacant 0.460- acre parcel and transform it into two new residences for the community. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat of Subdivision pursuant to 13-2 of the Des Plaines Subdivision Ordinance with the following conditions: 1. Sidewalks shall be added along the Birchwood Avenue right-of-way for the width of the entire property. 2. The site plan provided for the new homes will be non-binding. No approval is being given to the proposed site plan as part of this application. All proposed private improvements shall be approved via a building/site improvement permit. 3. That all drawings comply with all applicable codes. Such drawings and final plat documents may have to be amended to comply with standards, regulations and ordinances, which can be accomplished at time of applying for a Final Plat of Subdivision. 4. Any bond or warranty required by the City of Des Plaines shall be produced and posted prior to recording the Final Plat of Subdivision. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Section 13-2-2 (Approval of Final Plat By Planning and Zoning Board) of the Subdivision Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board has the authority to recommend approval of the Final Plat of Subdivision request for the property at 614 Birchwood Avenue. City Council will have the final authority over the Final Plat of Subdivision request. Page 3 of 16 Attachments: Attachment 1: Project Narrative Attachment 2: Location Map Attachment 3: Plat of Survey Attachment 4: Proposed Site Plan Attachment 5: Final Plat of Subdivision Attachment 6: Final Engineering Drawings Attachment 7: Landscape Plan Attachment 8: Site and Context Photos Page 4 of 16 2/25/2020 Final Plat of Subdivision for 616 & 614 Birchwood We are applying for a Final Plat of Subdivision to subdivide the existing lot into two lots, 616 & 614 Birchwood. There have been no changes to the requests or plans since the Tentative Plat of Subdivision. The property is a vacant lot in size of20.050sq ft. The property is located north of Touhy Avenue and East of Wolf Road. The existing zoning of the lot is Rl. The owner wishes to subdivide the property into two 50' X 167' residential lots. The proposed lots will comply with the proposed zoning requirements. Attachment 1 Page 5 of 16 Attachment 2 Page 6 of 16 � .\'( I/ I-I Ill. i, ' �I 1-. "' 20 feet PL A T Of� ._\" l 1 R J '£ Ylot 12 in !Hock 2 1n Douglas Manor, a Suhclivision of the Eas t J, of the Southeast \ of Seel.ton 30, Township Id North. Range 12 East of the Th1rcl Principal M eridian, in Cook Count�, Illinois. �� 1\/0\' W IH\. ll/111,,i1, /' "" ,,,,,.,,JI ,tu,/ \11 IL'\o ill/ \ 111/11 \t•,·,t \J, r,,"P• ,. II 1,1,n;,, ,,,-, _.,,_;,1� e-v�,,./ r,,.,,,_, ,r,,,,.,,,.,,.-/,RD# ot .JK",,;;,rfr t" o,: //t; '',,.,,,A'nV " .....J. ,....,,...,,,.,,. � 1/"w,,-JT ,:"" ';._) • Jovr,Y /4 /d,:::,/ ;Pv6', �c � <) (l '1 � I'\. � t1l fi--�, o J#<'IP .ec : (/:,. 'n:.1· 'I. !\. � " � �� \.�'9) �� ' "� <:I 0 � ' \ ,J � � � '� � "l "l\i -Jf /"or � ....,d'>o /ZO � 0 '' v,'!:..!"r _ C �4,-:::_A«-�/2 4"u,1. ,',)-;;.,, 6 ,,,, /,,o.r '-L�,,,,-:!!...--::::_,,. 2 _ � 'I " � ,e-,.,,..,r � � r=,r , '" • ..(,-,,r-�."1oe.t) • J'T $"' O• • ,,:�¾ ,'?9 l'�•'O ,. II"' ""'I . � ., 'I.,ti �� • � "I:� <J!sK�.�\� . ' y:� .... , � "'I - �= � ,, � ) T '. "') �� r -- ·"JJo!o"-.. : j 1zo !..o,, �---...:..... ________ 4 1. '7 1 1 J l I ,,,.-,,,., o/' /,Rc,-/ /� o,Jc � (/,-?VT /�o,._, ,P//1',F i,v,'/(,._. IINl>II<\/ \//;//, 48584 I II I Ii liOOA 42-11-49 c: 7,Y.;''t:?'JT r'o,vr;'f',r-� C�� #.--WJT ,,C/PI' l'f ,(' o,./ <.'/,,.,,,r ¢' o '= 7,. ..ft:,.,,,,...y \I ,I 143 8 /✓e C'HWOO£J ·/"' � """' .n,,") ,,,, .... ,,,,,# ,,,, �p..t. LA/vD '•,, Avc/1/ue \/ \I I ( II II //\Ill\ ( ( I{ \ f) (If u )(}A I \\ ()1\/Hl<I /)/fl PluymcrL, Mac0onnlcl, liar grove 6 Lee, Ltd. ......... �o ··········· o'u',, �<Jj/ ··•.�?� I.ANTON ADAMS, /11,nou Professional Land Surveyor. hereby cem/j, rhat I have surveyed the property described above and cha1 the plat hereon drawn 1s a c-orrect represemaflon thereof This profe.ss,onal service conforms to the cu"ent J//1no1s m1mmum srandards for a baundo,y survt) Compare legal descnpuon on 1h1s pla1 w11h deed or /tile pol,c;, ,.·ompare 0/1 points before butldtng by same and report any d,jftrences 01 on.:e /Juilcimg iin�, ·and easements. ,f any, are shown as they appear on the ru,,rdl!d plat of subdrvwon, 01her wise refer /0 deed. 111/e pol1C) or Zoning ordtnanceI Dwanu!.1 or angles shown may not be assumed b� sea/mg : f§ .-· ANTON ADAMS ·._ �: : a::: 35-2810 : O:•a.. • :O• : � MT. PROSPECT : : � -.. ILLINO!S • .-i,:,..,.. c,S>;•.. ..•·-§::> ...... ... ,, -1r,·········�o ... ... ',,,, I: OF Ill�,,,,' , ....... ,,,, \fl)/ \"/ l'h'()\/'HT. f!J�u� l/1111"11 l'r"/n11111111/ l.uu,/ \'tin, 1,11 I_J, ,·mt lt35-:!Sl(J 11 pm •1 l l / 16 \/)2016 Attachment 3 P a g e 7 o f 1 6 J l ? . B E C L l I , l >. B E C L l 6 ? ? 6 C E 6 J l ! l F4 E C . " l l ! l 1$ U " l l ! l Jh f i ` j e f g l ] _ _ f ` g g " l l . l :] ^ b g e d l B e f f a g l 6 6 l .B $ 6 ? " l J P I R . V 6 C 3 + . E F E E ? 6 C * * E B l ^B ` u K\ W V u YL Y B u 'u K \ W V u YK Y A u Qc \B = < \ % W @ "o pu 7u " ?\ W ^ ^ V W ` ? G ?G : K V u P K V O u CB V ? A u fW W @ u C B V ? B u L\ W V u C A V ? B u Pu 9 u : \ ? u PB V F _ G u V R j u 9 u VW \ ` G B \ Q j u \u 9 u \ : @ K d ^ u ^ R u j u 9 u ^W d ` G B \ R j u ?G u 9 u ? G W \ @ u P B V E ` G u B R u j u 9 u A : ^ _ B \ R j u n u 9 u \ A ? W \ @ u e : R d A u f P u j u 9 u h^ _ B \ P j u 9u S B : ^ d \ B @ u e : R d B u cY u 9 u c Y K ? : P u Y d @ u 9 u Y d = P K ? u d_ K P K _ j u u @\ : L V : E A u B : ^ B S A V` u _f f u 9 u _ W Z u WC u i V @ W f u h P P u a" C u 9 u `W Z u W C u CW d V @ : ` K W V u J* $ ? . l l 6 C* 4 l . H P $ ? J l k. L l ,6 J L $ C * . J l $ I . l B $ I < . , l 6 C l 1 . . L l $ C , l , . * 6 B $ ? l F $ I L J l L4 . I . E 1 l EI , .I . ,l (V " l ,I $ T C l (V " l =)l JP I S V . , l (V # l Z X l &Y )l \l Y - Y 2 l ZZ Z Z Z Z l [l EI , . I l C E # l \B ? 9- - & & & u + + + + + + + + + ! + + + + + + + + + + + + # + + + + + + + + + + + + + $ + " + g R P ^ u ^d = u \A ? u M: V d : \ j u ,& u ( 6 2 , u :^ u @ W ? u , ( 2 4 , / 0 2 u "" " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " q r u ^[ P K ` u @/ R 0 A l u u = ] J ? N u u C \ : T B u s #1 ) , u %K G 5 % @ M l @] K e B f : j u ?W V ? u Ze U ` u 1 6 * u V4 2 & , ,6 Au C_ u Yd = PI ? u db P I_ I A ^u ;V @ u @\ ; IV u EA u A :^ A SA V t u YA \u @m l ku (- (/ 1 6- (u \A ? u \@ A @u ^A Z _A S >A \ u ,/ u (6 / - u - 5c 5 c -c 8u 8 u ou o u Sc > c - c T. c Uc U - c =V - /0 c W c X - :c : < c c c %+ % + & ' ( ) * + -c -c .c -c -c Y\ W Y u , u ^ ` W \ j u \B ^ K @ B V ? A u `$ 9 1 0 , 2 1 u CC 9 1 0 . 4 / u 1 Y 7 A8 R Z 9 [ 2 \]^ c F C DD D D F D c " !! !!!c - _c KD ED L FF L D EF ED GH M N F EF EH ED I E F L KD L D `- !!)c -c % % * % + % ,Oc c - <3 c <6 c .c -c -c .c -c Y\ W Y u ^_ W \ j u \A ^ K @ B V ? A u `! C 9 1 0 , 2 1 u CC 9 1 0 . 5 / u !" -c P! ",! !! !! &'? ! ! @ ! ! $! c c c F c - %B &% % % 4 O a #JO O c b ; !c - @BPE:@W^u _BV_Hu^d=u \B?u :dEd^`u6u ,&&1u :^u@W?u&1,/+(,&34u ( JL$L.l E1l 6??6CE6Jl *EPCLVl E1l ,PF$3.l 7l <.CC.L4l $ l <.CC.,Vl ,El 4.I.(Vl JL$L.l L4$Ll 8l 4$R.l FI.F$I.,l L4.l J 6L.l F?$Cl ,.F6*L.,l 4.I.ECl L47Jl F?$Cl I.FI.J.COl L4.l *EC,6L6ECJl 1EPC,l $Ll L4 .l L7B.l E1l FI.F.I$l LcECl XDu J$6,l F?$C l >.BECNl 7??7CE6Jl ;&DQ'Wl l l 7??7CE6Jl FIE1.JJ6EC$>l ?$C,l JPIR.VEIl CEl l BVl >6*.CJ.l .UF 9 I.Jl l I.R6J.,#l !l ,I7R.T$Vl ?$VEPLl At t a c h m e n t 4 Page 8 of 16 OW N E R SU R V E Y O R MA Y O R PL A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G B O A R D DI R E C T O R O F F I N A N C E DI R E C T O R O F P U B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G EA S E M E N T P R O V I S I O N S DR A I N A G E LEGEND: “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” At t a c h m e n t 5 Page 9 of 16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 12 IN BLOCK 2 IN DOUGLAS MANOR, A SUBDl\/1SION OF lHE EAST HALF OF lHE SOUlHEAST QUARTER OF ECTION 30, TO\\NSHIP 41 NORlH, RANGE 12, EAST OF lHE lHIRD PRINClPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, IWNOIS. NOlE= ClTY OF DES PLAINES STANDARDS SUPERCEDE All OlHERS ON PLANS. NOlE: $20,000 BOND IS REQUIRED TO WORK IN CITY OF DES PLAINS RIGHT-OF WAY. ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR HELDAK'S SUBDIVISION 614 AND 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE. DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS Maxon Stloou�rs Supplf� & Indoor Range �::,�:,h:;;,;;!e: Q il' .,,_ ....w., .. w., be.t\ ... ,t I• I' � Prll&P"'t'IU ,..."",.,." > • l• '/ r·� l • � JI � Arndt NOTES NOlE= CALL FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY INSPECTION 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE (847) 391-5390. NOlE: CALL FOR SITE WORK INSPECTION 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE. NOlE= NEIii. Y CONSTRUCTED STORM SEWER ADJACENT TO lHE PROPOSED BUILDING SHALL BE TELEVISED AND lHE DIGITAL IMAGERY SHAILl BE SUBMITTED TO lHE ClTY FOR REVIEW. 1. lHESE PLANS ARE BASED ON lHE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY: GEOPOOL SURVEYORS 12 SOUlH 355 LEMONT ROAD LEMONT, IL 60439 (630) 739-0707 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT lHE DESIGN ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT TO VERIFY lHAT lHEY ARE WORKING FROM lHE MOST CURRENT SET OF PLANS AND SPEClFlCA TIONS. � Hu,., 4A.•1' •fl• i¥: Warehcugl! DlrMt Q Qommcare LSG Sky Ch•f• Q \ @ ® United llt>Playcrort 0 H.,:,oo.,11&'ft � .. i '. � ! � ........... �. B-Jr11Jby $ or 0("' Plam� 9 Pra1r1e Mutenul Yurd e Wrllow¾.; Go gle �t,r:tll■fl I!i ; ;, e •',_ .. Apache Park 1 L>lcePorl< li. J p Q � i I ,..,,� f � @! t s I Lon11�lom STll.!!ikhou�P 9 Speedwuy 0 Cr ,..., i ·, . 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY UTILITIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY lHAT lHE PROPOSED UTILITIES SH0\\1-1 ON lHIS PLAN lHAT ENTER lHE PROPOSED BUILDING(S) CORRESPOND 1111H lHE UTILITIES ON lHE PLUMBING PLANS AS lHEY EXIT lHE BUILDING(S). CONTRACTOR TO REPORT IN WRITING ANY DISCREPANClES IN SIZE, LOCATION, OR INVERT ELEVATION TO lHE DESIGN ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY FOR RESOLUTION OF lHE CONFLICT IN WRITING. LOCATION MAP 4. lHE 01\NER CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING All REQUIRED PERMITS. 5. lHE INFORMATION REGARDING lHE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UTILITIES IS TAKEN FROM lHE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, BUT MAY NOT BE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. lHE CONTRACTOR SHAILl VERIFY lHE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. 6. SPEClAL CARE SHALL BE TAKEN ADJACENT TO EXISTING UTIUTIES AND TREES TO PREVENT UNNECESSARY DAMAGE. 7. IT IS lHE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY All DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS AND STARTING CONSTRUCTION, lHE CONTRACTOR SHAILl NOTIFY lHE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN lHE PLANS AND FlELD CONDITION EXIST. lHE ENGINEER \\Ill HAVE A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME TO ASSIST IN lHE RESOLUTION OF lHE ISSUE. 8. lHE ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DISCREPANCIES BETll{[N lHE PLANS AND CURRENT SITE CONDITION. �1£ INFORMATION: ADDRESS: 614 AND 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE P.I.N. 09-30-401-113-0000 ZONED: R-I LOT AREA: 20,050 S.F. (0.461 AC.) � FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT: 35.00' FRONT YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 35.00' INTERIOR SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT: 5.00' EAST SIDEYARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 5.00' REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT: MIN 25X REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 64.19' IMPERYJWS AREA-MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 45� MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: 35� EXISTING IMPER'IIOUS AREA: 0 S.F. � OF IMPER'IIOUS SURF ACE COVERED: 0� POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPER'IIOUS AREA: 6,117 S.F. lHE LOCATION OF EXISllNG UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES ARE SH0\\1-1 IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFlED BY lHE Ol\t-lER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. lHE CONTRACTOR SHAILl DETERMINE lHE EXACT LOCATION OF AIL1 EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND All DAMAGES MilCH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY lHE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE AIL1 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. i OF IMPER'IIOUS SURFACE COVERED: 6,117 S.F./20,050 S.F. = 0.305 (30.5,i) CALl.BEFOFE YOU DIG _______ _, fflEOPOOL l'!IJiij ENGtEERING, INC. 12S355 LEMONT ROAD LEMONT, IWNOIS 60439 ��:N%M,3�3:=�oggo1 EMAIL: GEOPOOLOCOMCAST.NET PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FlRM NO. 1B4.004416 PREPARED FOR: ZENON HELDAK 2275 S. Webster Ave. Des Plaines, IL 6001 B [PROP. BLDGS = 4,233 S.F.; PROP. DRIVEWAYS = 1,781 S.F. PROP. SIDEWALK & STOOPS = 67 S.F.; IIINDOW WELlS = 36 S.F.] � lHE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FlELD SURVEY INFORMATION & EXISTING ORAIIINGS. lHE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE lHAT lHE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN lHE AREA, SlHER IN SER'IICE OR ABANDONED. lHE SURVEYOR FURlHER DOES NOT WARRANT lHAT lHE UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES SHOWN ARE IN lHE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALlHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY lHAT lHEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. lHE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED lHE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SIZE & TYPE OF UTILITY PIPES SHOULD BE FlELD VERIFlED. COVER SHEET (N.T.S.) PROJECT BENCHMARK= CITY OF DES PLAINES BENCHMARK # 34 MONUMENT SET IN CONCRETE AT S.W. CORNER HOWARD AVE. AND lHE C&NW RAIUROAD 5' SOUlH OF E/P OF HOWARD AND 17' WEST OF R.R. TRACKS ELEVATION ............................................................... 653.75 (NAVD 1988) RE'IISI ONS: DAllE: NO. DESCRIPTION: 07/24/2019 1 PER CITY COMMENTS 08/15/2019 2 PER CLIENT REQllEST 10/08/2019 3 PER CITY COMMENTS LEGEND= EXIST. ELEV. -(-(-EXIST. STORM SEWER •761.00 PROP. ELEV. -<-<-EXIST. SANITARY SEWER @ EXIST. STORM MANHOLE -w-w-EXIST. WATER EXIST. SAN. MANHOLE @O EXIST. CATCH BASIN 761 EXIST. CONTOUR ,;:, EXIST. GAS VALVE -762-PROP. CONTOUR ,;:, EXIST. WATER VALVE -w-w-PROP. WATER SER'IICE a EXIST. ARE HYDRANT -<-<-PROP. SANITARY SER'IICE { EXIST. TRAFFlC �GN -c-c-PROP. STORM SEWER EXIST. UTILITY POLE A EXIST. ANCHOR +-PROP. DRAINAGE DIRECTION l!OE EXIST. LIGHT POLE -SF-SF-PROP. SILT FENCE l!il EXIST. INLET -PF-PF-PROP. ORANGE PLASTIC OPEN MESH i5 EXIST. WATER BUFFALO BOX PERIMETER FENCE -TF-TF-PROP. PARKWAY TREE PROTECTION FENCE t>-EXIST. DOWNSPOUT -x-x--CHAIN LINK FENCE EXIST. SIGN t}O EXIST. TREE -c-c--WOOD FENCE -o-o--IRON FENCE � EXIST. TREE EX, EXIST EXISTING TO BE REMOVED SF SILT FENCE TYP. TYPICAL PVMT. PAVEMENT C, CONC. CONCRETE G GRADE EL, ELEV ELEVATION I.E., INV. INVERT ELEVATION wf 1111H �G. TOP OF FOUNDATION FINISHED GRADE M.H. MANHOLE C.B. CATCH BASIN S.B. SETBACK C&G CURB & GUTTER SW SWALE SAN. SANITARY BSMT. BASMENT TF TREE FENCE SHEET INDEX C1. 0 COVER SHEET C2.0 EXISTING CONOlllON, EROSION CONTROL & REMOVAL PLAN C3.0 SITE DRAINAGE, GRADING, & UTILITY PLAN C4.0 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAIL C5.0 CITY OF DES PLAINES DETAILS DRAINAGE STAlEMENT "TO lHE BEST OF OUR KN0\11.EDGE AND BELIEF, lHE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATERS \\ILL NOT BE CHANGED BY lHE CONSTRUCTION OF lHIS DEVELOPMENT OR ANY PART lHEREOF, OR, lHAT IF DRAINAGE \\Ill BE CHANGED, REASONABLE PRO'IISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR COLLECTION AND OIVER�ON OF SUCH SURFACE WATERS INTO PUBLIC AREAS OR DRAINS APPROVED FOR USE BY lHE CITY ENGINEER, AND lHAT SUCH SURFACE WATERS ARE PLANNED IN ACCORDANCE 1111H GENERALl Y ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES SO AS TO REDUCE lHE LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES BECAUSE OF lHE CONSTRUCTION OF lHIS DEVELOPMENT." STAllE OF IWNOIS) ss. COUNTY OF COOK) I, OMAR A. ZAYYAD, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF ILLINOIS, HEREBY CERTIFY lHAT lHESE Cl'IIL ENGINEERING PLANS, NOT lHE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, AS LISTED IN lHE INDEX, HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY GEOPOOL ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED UNDER MY PERSONAL DIRECTION. lHESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE USED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF lHE PRo..ECT SPECIFlCA TIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. OCTOBER 8, 2019 ILLINOIS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 062-048172 MY LICENSE EXPIRES ON 11-30-2019. E 1/2 SW 1/4 SEC. 230 T.41N., R.12E., OF 3RD P.M. 614 & 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE., DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DRAWN: KB DAllE: 4.29.19 CHECKED: OAZ ENG PROJ #19-016 SURV PROJ#19-016 FIELD BOOK: DAllE: SHEET: C1.0 DAllE: Attachment 6 Page 10 of 16 SIAlll 17Fil COOSJRIICilOO ENJRANCf NOJFS-1. �-IDOT COARSE AGGREGATE GRADATIONS: CA-1, CA-2, CA-3, OR CA-4. 2. �-NOT LESS THAN EIGHT (8) NCHES. 3. EIL1ER....CL.OJ-SHAL1 BE PLACED OVER THE ENllRE AREA PRIOR TO PL.ACING CF STONE. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHAl..l liEET THE REOJIREMENTS CF MATERIAL CLASS I, II OR IV N THE ILLNOIS URBAN MANUAL. 4. STONE Pl ACFUFNI THE SUES IN THE ENlRANCE SHALl BE Pl.ACED ACCOODING TO ILLNOIS URBAN MANUAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICAllONS 25 (ROO<Flll). PLACEMENT Villi BE BY t.lETHOO 1 AND COMPACTION Will IE CLASS Ill. 5. �-THE ENlRANCE Sl-iAl..l BE MAINTAINED IN A �DlllON 'M-110! Will PRE\.tNT TRACKING OR A.OWING r£ SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REWIRE PERIOOIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDlll�AL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR a.EANOUT CF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILlfD, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE REMO\el 1161EllATELY. 6. WASl::l!Hr'M-IEELS Sl-iALl BE a.EANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENlRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-CF-WAY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIIRED, IT SHAl..l BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED 'MTH STONE AND 'M-110! DRAINS INTO AN APPRO\oED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. All SEDIMENTS Sl-iAl..l BE PRE\ENlED FROM ENTERING STOOM DRAINS, DITOiES, WAlERCOURSES, OR SURFACE WATERS INC.UDING WE1LAll)5. 7. PERIOOIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHAl.1 BE PRO\.tDED AFTER EACH RAIN. SHI FFN'l NOJFS· 1. 1EMPORARY SEDIMENT FENCE SHAl.1 BE INSTAil.ED PRIOR TO ANY GRAONG WORK IN THE ARE.A TO BE PROTECTED. THEY SHAl..l BE MAINTAINED THROOGHOOT THE COOSTRUCTION PERIOO AND REMOlim IN CONJJNCTION WITH THE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION. 2. FENCE POSTS SHALL BE EITHER STANDARD STEB. POST 00 1MXD POST '111TH A MIINIMUM CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF 3.0 SQ. IN. 3. STEB. POSTS SHALL BE STANDARD T ANO U SECllONS '1£1GH11NG NOT LESS THAN 1.33 Pootf>S PER LINEAR FOOT OR OTHER STEEL POSTS HA\1NG EQUIVALENT STRENGTH AND BENDING RESISTANCE. 4. 'MRE FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM 12 GAUGE ffiE WITH A 6 INCH MAXIMUM CPENING. 5. GEOTEXllLE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REWREMENTS CF MATERIAL SPECIFICAllONS 592 (GEOTEXTILE) TABLE 1 OR 2, CLASS I, THE FABRIC SHALL HAVE AN ADS OF AT LEAST 30 FOR NONWO\IEN AND 50 FOR WO\£N MAlERIAL. SILT FFN'l MAINTENANCE NOD 1. FILTER BARRIERS Sl-iALL BE INSPECTED IMliEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL GREATER THAN t AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REWIRED REPAIRS SHAl.l IE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOOE OR BECOME INEFFECllVE PRIOR TO THE END CF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALl BE REPLACED PROMPlLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS Sl-iOULD BE REMCMD AFTER EACH STORM E\o£NT. THEY MUST BE REMO\'m WHEN THE DEPOSITS REACH APPROlOMA TELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE """""' 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILlER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REWIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. SOIi EROSION it; SFPIMENT CONJROI NOJFS 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHAI.L PERFORM All WORK PER --PROCEDURES I: STANDARDS FOR SOIL EROSION I: SEDIMENTATION CONTR<l..• -I.E.P.A. (LATEST EDITION) I: PER CITY OF DES PLAINES COOE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALl REMOVE llRE MUD FROM ALL CONSlRUCllON VEHICLES LEAVNG THE SITE. HE SHALL INSTAl.l A STABILIZED GRA\IEL DRIVE (TEMPORARY FOR CONSlRUCllON ACCESS) &: A PERIMffiR SILT FENCI BEFORE STARllNG DK. INLET BASKET FILTERS Sl-iALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO STARllNG WORK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SH.All PROTECT SWALES, DRAINS ac SEWERS WITH STAKED STRAW BALES. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALl FILTER ANY PUMPED GROUND WATER BEFORE IT FLOWS OFF-SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SH.All INST.All AODlllONAL SOL EROSION CONTRCl..5, IF REQUIRED BY ClTY OF DES PLAINES INSPECTORS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR 9-1.All lEMPOOARILY SEED TIP Sal STOCKPILES TO REDUCE DUST PRCB..EMS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALl ROUTINELY INSPECT & MAINTAIN THE SOIL EROSlctl MEASURES. QfM(I !DON NOJES 1. COCROINATE WITH PRo.ECT MANAGER FOR THE PLACEMENT OF MATERIAL STOCKPILES. ALL MAlERIAL ARE TO BE STOCKPILED SEPARATELY FOR USE IN PREPARING THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT SUB-BASE. 2. All EXISTING UTUTIES ARE TO BE REMOVED 'M-IERE INOICA TED. 3. CONTRACTOR IS TO TAKE CARE IN LIMlllNG MATERIALS FROM ENlERING THE EXISTING STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWERS. 4. MAINTAIN POSITl\or MAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONTRACTOR Sl-lAl..l OBTAIN ALL PERMITS REWIRED FOO DEMa.JTION INClUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. FAA. COUNTY, NPDES, CITY CF DES PLAINES AND COilED. 6. CONTRACTOR TO \orRIFY ALL OJANTITIES PRIOR TO BIDDING AND SHALL INFORM ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ENG1t£ER TO DIS(l)SS ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCREPANClES FOUND ON SITE PRIOR TO ANY �STRUCTION. EXISTING UTILITIES ENCOUNlERED THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION CF THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IN ORDER TO MAKE A DEOSION. PRO\/EE ITEMIZED FEE FOR UTILITY REMOVAL (LINEAL FOOT) IN BID. 8. CONTRACTOR Sl-iALL REMOVE All ABOVE GROUND STRCUTURES TO GRADE. 9. CONTRACTOR Sl-iAl..l REMOVE All FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, AND BELOW GRADE CONCRETE OR OTHER CllSTRUCTIONS TO Fllll DEPTH. 10. All CONCRETE AND ASPHALT TO EE PULVERIZED TO 3• MAXIH..t.l PIECES. 11. ALL ABANDONED SANITARY SEWERS SHAl..l BE PWGGEO AT BOTH ENDS 'MTH A MINIMUM CF TWO (2) FEET LONG NON-SHRINK CCNCRETE/MORTAR PWGS. 12. All WAlER SERVICES SHALl BE REMOVED AND CAPPED AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHER'MSE NOlED. lliE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND H AVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENll Y VERIFIED BY lliE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. lliE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE lliE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES \\lilCH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY lliE CONTRACTOR'S F Al LURE TO EXACll Y LOCATE AND PRESERVE All UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EOPOOL ENGINEERING, INC. PREPARED FOR: ZENON HELDAK 2275 S. Webster Ave. Des Plaines, IL 60018 125355 LEMONT ROAD LEMONT, IWNOIS 60439 PHONE: (630) 739-0707 FAX: (630) 739-6080 EMAIL: GEOPOOLGCOMCAST.NET PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM NO. 184.004416 LOT 2 tllll<;, lliE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHO� HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FlELO SURVEY INFORMATION !c EXISTING DRA\\1NGS. lliE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE lliAT lliE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE All SUCH UTILITIES IN lliE AREA, �lliER IN SERv1CE OR ABANDONED. lliE SURVEYOR FURrnER DOES NOT WARRANT lliAT lliE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN lliE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED AL lliOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY lliAT lliEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. lliE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED lliE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SIZE !c TYPE OF UTILITY PIPES SHOULD BE FlELD VERIFlED. LOT 6 LOT 12 CB Rlt.1EL=648.89 Ll.OT 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS, EROSION CONTROL, AND REMOVAL PLAN I-lo'IIIIIIIIII -I i .. . LETTIRS&"IIN.IEIJIT SIGN OCT.All � GRAPHIC SCALE 20 "20 .. .. ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND= • 761.00 @ ®@O ;:, ;:, a {! a()E ilil 0 ()--l }}CJ � 6"'HSTN'LI<II =�: PClffltl'tLENE , SW.WBM! 3'MIN. '":;.--:-i:-, ":-'.'...ttmlENCH 'r NA11'£Sl:l. _/ SlRAW BALE ANOiOR SECllON A-A '-��<ll#Lllltul48"lci4 " 4"X4"llll'WDOOPOST ::.O'SIEUPOST EXIST. ELEV. PROP. ELEV. EXIST. STORM MANHOLE EXIST. SAN. MANHOLE EXIST. CATCH BASIN EXIST. GAS VAL VE EXIST. WATER VALVE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT EXIST. TRAFFlC SIGN EXIST. UTILITY POLE EXIST. ANCHOR EXIST. LIGHT POLE EXIST. INLET EXIST. WATER BUFFALO BOX EXIST. DO�SPOUT EXIST. SIGN EXIST. TREE EXIST. TREE TO BE REMOVED 761 --762--w-w- -<-<- -(-(- + -SF-SF- -PF-PF- -TF-TF- EX, EXIST SF TYP. PVMT. C, CONC. G EL, ELEV I.E., INV. wf �G. M.H. C.B. S.B. C&G SW SAN. BSMT. lf EXIST. STORM SEWER EXIST. SANITARY SEWER EXIST. WATER EXIST. CONTOUR PROP. CONTOUR PROP. WATER SERv1CE PROP. SANITARY SERv1CE PROP. STORM SEWER PROP. DRAINAGE DIRECTION PROP. SILT FENCE PROP. ORANGE PLASTIC OPEN MESH PERIMETER FENCE PROP. PARKWAY TREE PROTECTION FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE EXISTING SILT FENCE TYPICAL PAVEMENT CONCRETE GRADE ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION I\HH TOP OF FOUNDATION FINISHED GRADE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN SElBACK CURB !c GUffiR SWALE SANITARY BASMENT TREE FENCE - l!QIE,;_ 1. TOP FLANGE FABRICATED FROM 1 j" X ,j" X j" ANGLE TEMPORARY CON�E'IE WASHOUT FACILITY -STRAW BALE DETAIL BASE RIM FABRICATED FROM 1 j" x j" x j" CHANNEL. RE"1SIONS: DATE: NO. DESCRIPTION: 07/24/2019 1 PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 08/15/2019 2 PER CLIENT REQUEST 10/08/2019 3 PER CITY COMMENTS (N.T.S.) 1-,,.,s· � I I I b--:11 11-I 20· HANDLES AND SUSPENSION BRACKETS FABRICATED FROM 1 j" X j" FLAT STOCK. 2. ALL DOMESTIC STEEL IS TO CONFORM TO ASTM-A36. 3. SEDIMENT BAG IS TO BE F AB RICA TED FROM 4 02./SQ. YD. NON-WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE REINFORCED \\llli POLYESTER MESH \\llli A MINIMUM FLOW RATE OF 145 GAL/MIN./SQ.FT. BAG IS TO BE DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM SILT AND DEBRIS CAPACITY OF 2 CU.FT. BAG IS TO BE SECURED TO BASE RIM \\llli A STAINLESS STEEL STRAP AND LOCK. INLET BASKET FILTER FOR TYPE 1 INLETS E 1/2 SW 1/4 SEC. 230 T.41N., R.12E., OF 3RD P.M. 614 & 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE., DES PLAINES, DRAWN: KB DA1E: 4.29.19 CHECKED: OAZ ENG PROJ #19-016 SLIRV PROJ#19-016 FIELD BOOK: DA1E: OA1E: ILLINOIS SHEET: C2.0 Attachment 6 Page 11 of 16 WARNING THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND H Al/f. NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFlED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATil/f., THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULi Y RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERl/f. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, EOPOOL ENGINEERING, NC. PREPARED FOR: ZENON 1-ELDAK 2275 S. Webster Ave. Des Plaines, IL 60018 12SJ55 LEMONT ROAD LEMONT, IWNOIS 60439 PHONE: (630) 739-0707 FAX: (630) 739-6080 EMAIL: GEOPOOLOCOMCAST.NET PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM NO. 184.004416 NOTE: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAl/f. BEEN LOCATED FROM FlELD SURl/f.Y INFORMATION & EXISTING DRA\\INGS. THE SURl/f.YOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SER\1CE OR ABANDONED. THE SURl/f.YOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICA JED AL THOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCA JED AS ACCURA m Y AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURl/f.YOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SIZE & TYPE OF UTILITY PIPES SHOULD BE FIELD 1/f.RIFIED. RI� "EL:!�·9.�J-INV EL=64U3'«E,W,S) NOTE:SAttTARYSERIJICE COtKCTION 'MLL REQl,JRE A lEMPORARY LANE CLOSOOE (J,l i.CHWOOO AVf.. 51m. t:'LAlES ANDBARRICADESWllHDKINGUGHS 10 BE USED, REFER. TO 1RAFFIC CONTR!l. PROCEDU�ES (CJ,lELANECLOSURE) THECllY PUIIJC'MlRKS DEPARlMENT MUST BE NOTIFED PRICR TO THE LANE CLOSURE Atl) lHES'IREET CUT TAKING PLACE. PROP.48"CB1YPE "A" -. _ W/BEEHIWGRADE PRCF.24"a!TYPE>"f RIMEL-=648.10 W/BEEHlliffGRACE INV0.•645.00 RIM EL•648.25 PROP. 24" ca"hfE-· "A"W/BEEHIWGRADE RIM EL=648.25 INVEl..•646.00 INVEL-=646.00 --·�o.· PROP. 24" CB--iYPE--"A!'. W/BEEHl'vft GRADE Rl1 EL-650.25-- / INVEL-=6'\1,�---01 -f"J,ROP. 36"CBffl·A· ,,' W/BEEHl'vft�ADE P�}A�TAB,�,'�_JiE;:�� ---c-=-----' ---<�------<=----=----<f---_ -___: <-:_ "-, I•!'¥ '>-+-COONfur TO EXISltm SANITARY SEYER i ,-. (CCRE�-BOOT) CUT IN WYE " RESTORE PAVEMENTPERQlYCFIEPI.AINES ,J' >�.��===S CF PARKWAY ( <v'l�\EXIST• SEWER INV,• 642.33+/-(VERIFY IN FF) t�) r· , Cll I RI� EL=648.B9 I I I -CCffiECTTOE)QS111G SANITARYSE\\£R (CCIE-�-8001) C11T IN WYE RESTOREPAVEMENTPEROTYOFDESPLAINES CONSTRUCTl� STANDARD SOD M.1. DISl\JREED AREAS Cf PARKWAY EXIST. SEYER INV. • IMJ.06+/-(VERIFY IN FIELD) NOlE: a.D WAlER SER'1CES TOBE REMO\ED AT CITYMAIN AND OTY MAIN PIPE TO BE PAlOED REVISIONS: DATE: NO. DESCRIPTION: -::_ -_-;:·,--::_<j_ - -<r GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN 07/2-4/2019 1 PER VILLAGE COMMENTS 08/15/2019 2 PER CLIENT REQUEST 10/08/2019 3 PER CITY COMMENTS GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) I inch - 20 ft. LEGEND= 761.00 @ @O ,:;, ,:;, q {! = lili 0 f)-- 0 � EXIST, ELEV, PROP. ELEV, EXIST. STORM MANHOLE EXIST. SAN. MANHOLE EXIST. CATCH BASIN EXIST. GAS VALl/f. EXIST. WATER VAl_l/f. EXIST. FlRE HYDRANT EXIST. TRAFFlC SIGN EXIST. UTILITY POLE EXIST. ANCHOR EXIST. LIGHT POLE EXIST. INLET -(-(- ,,.,, 761 --762--w-w- -<-<- -(-(- -SF-SF- -PF-PF- EXIST. STORM SEWER EXIST. SANITARY SEWER EXIST. WATER EXIST. CONTOUR PROP. CONTOUR PROP, WA lER SERV1CE PROP. SANITARY SER\1CE PROP. STORM SEWER PROP, DRAINAGE DIRECTION PROP. SILT FENCE EXIST. WATER BUFFAI_O BOX -TF-TF- PROP, ORANGE PLASTIC OPEN MESH PERIMETER FENCE PROP. PARKWAY TREE PROJECTION FENCE EXIST. DOWNSPOUT EXIST. SIGN EXIST. TREE EXIST. TREE TO BE REMOl/f.D -x-x-- -□-□-- -o-o-- EX, EXIST SF TYP. PVMT. C, CONC, G EL, ELEV I.E .. INV, rd M.H. C.B. S.B. C&G SW SAN, BSMT. TF PU&DE NOlE= CONTRACTOR TO RESTORE PARKWAY 111TH SOD. NOlE: CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE EXISTING SILT FENCE TYPICAL PAl/f.MENT CONCRETE GRADE ELEVATION INl/f.RT ELEVATION 111TH TOP OF FOUNDATION FlNISHED GRADE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN SETBACK CURB & GUTTER SWAI.E SANITARY BASMENT TREE FENCE PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT NO STREET CUTS ALLOWED FOR ANY UTILITES ON BIRCHWOOD A 1/f.. TRENCHES IN CITY R-0-W MUST BE FLOWABLE FlLL E 1/2 SW 1/4 SEC. 230 T.41N., R.12E., OF 3RD P.M. 614 & 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE., DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DRAWN: KB DATE: 4.29.19 CHECKED: OAZ DATE: SHEET: C3.0 ENG PROJ #19-06 SURV PROJ#19-016 FIELD BOOK: DATE: Attachment 6 Page 12 of 16 ··· · CI T Y O F D E S P L A I N E S PU B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T 14 2 0 M I N E R S T R E E T DE S P L A I N E S , I L 6 0 0 1 6 PH O N E - 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 3 9 0 F A X 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 6 1 9 WW W . D E S P L A I N E S . O R G PLAN AND PROFILE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILSBLSA D TPO 10 1 15HORI N A VERT N A 1 OF 1 -- - - - - - - At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 13 of 16 TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL ALL SEWER AND WATER (EXCEPT PVC)ALL TRENCH BACKFILL WILL BE MEASURED USING THE IDOT TRENCH BACKFILL TABLESTRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL PVC SEWERALL TRENCH BACKFILL WILL BE MEASURED USING THE IDOT TRENCH BACKFILL TABLES CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIAL TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL ALL SEWER AND WATER (EXCEPT PVC)CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIAL TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL PVC SEWER CI T Y O F D E S P L A I N E S PU B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T 14 2 0 M I N E R S T R E E T DE S P L A I N E S , I L 6 0 0 1 6 PH O N E - 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 3 9 0 F A X 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 6 1 9 WW W . D E S P L A I N E S . O R G DETAIL SHEET C4.0 At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 14 of 16 THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND H AVf. NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVf.. THE CONTIRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE CALl. BEFORE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY YOU DIG THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATIE AND '------J PRESERVf. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EOPOOL ENGINEERING, INC. 12S355 LEMONT ROAD LEMONT, ILLINOIS 60439 PHONE: (630) 739-0707 FAX: (630) 739-6080 EMAIL: GEOPOOL@COMCAST.NET PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM NO. 18+.00+416 PREPARED FOR: ZENON HELDAK 2275 S. Webster Ave. Des Plaines, IL 60018 t:!Qli;_ THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVf. BEEN LOCATED FROM FlELD SURVf.Y INFORMATION & EXISTING DRAl'!NGS. THE SURVf.YOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE AUL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SER�CE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVf.YOR FlURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVf.YOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PRIOR TO CONSTIRUCTION, SIZE & TYPE OF UTILITY PIPES SHOUUD BE FIELD Vf.RIFlED. - --'J�----1---<t--------<t--- LANDSCAPING PLAN --<---_,.,·-_:-=z:c: =-.:..._--z:-..:_-_-�:,----=------<� REVISIONS: DATE: NO. DESCRIPTION: GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. E 1/2 SW 1/4 SEC. 230 T.41N., R.12E., OF 3RD P.M. 614 & 616 BIRCHWOOD AVE., DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS DRAWN: KB DATE: 4.29.19 CHECKED: OAZ DATE: SHEET: LT-1 ENG PROJ #19-06 SURV PROJ#19-016 FIELD BOOK: DATE: Attachment 7 Page 15 of 16 614 Birchwood Avenue – Public Notice and Front of Property 614 Birchwood Avenue – Looking West at Front of Property 614 Birchwood Avenue – Looking Northwest at Full Property 614 Birchwood Avenue – Looking Northeast at Front of Property A t t a c h m e n t 8 P a g e 1 6 o f 1 6 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1420 Miner Street Des Plaines, IL 60016 P: 847.391.5380 desplaines.org Date: March 3, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Jonathan Stytz, Planner Cc: Patrick Ainsworth, AICP, Economic Development Coordinator Subject: Consideration of a Final Plat of Subdivision for a Single-Family Residence Development Generally at 2282 Eastview Drive, Case #20-009-FPLAT (5th Ward) Issue: The petitioner is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision, under Section 13-2 of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Des Plaines Municipal Code, to subdivide one property into two lots of record at 2282 Eastview Drive. Analysis: Address: 2282 Eastview Drive Owners: Eugeniusz Boronski, 2282 Eastview Drive, Des Plaines, IL 60018 Petitioner: Andrzej L. Bednarczyk, Geopool Surveying, Inc., 12S355 Lemont Road, Lemont, IL 60439 Case Number: 20-009-FPLAT Real Estate Index Number: 09-29-302-039-0000 Ward: #5, Alderman Carla Brookman Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Residential District Existing Land Use: Residential Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1, Single-Family Residential District South: R-1, Single-Family Residential District MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 16 East: R-1, Single-Family Residential District West: R-1, Single-Family Residential District Surrounding Land Use: North: Single-Family Residential South: Single-Family Residential East: Single-Family Residential West: Single-Family Residential Street Classification: Eastview Drive is a local street. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential. Project Description: The petitioner, Andrzej L. Bednarczyk, on behalf of Eugeniusz Boronski, is requesting a Final Plat of Subdivision for the property located at 2282 Eastview Drive. The subject property is 0.500 acres in size and is comprised of one lot, which is improved with a single-family house as shown in the Plat of Survey (Attachment 3). This applicant successfully obtained a Tentative Plat of Subdivision approval and a major variation approval for lot width in 2019 for the same lot configuration. The proposed lots will meet all other subdivision regulations. The petitioner proposes to subdivide the 21,697.52-square foot lot into two lots and construct a new single-family home as shown in the Proposed Site Plan (Attachment 4). Both proposed lots will have a width of 50-feet and an area of 9,350-square feet. The variation requests for lot width and side yard setback were approved with conditions at the September 3, 2020 City Council meeting. The existing property boundaries extend into the Eastview Drive right-of-way and the petitioner is proposing to dedicate the eastern 33-feet of the existing property, totaling 330-square feet, to the City of Des Plaines as shown on the Final Plat of Subdivision (Attachment 5). A Landscape Plan (Attachment 7) has been submitted with the Final Subdivision application. The Landscape Plan entails foundation landscaping for the street-facing elevations of each proposed single-family residence pursuant to the condition of approval imposed by staff. Final Plat of Subdivision Report Name of Subdivision: Boronski’s Subdivision Address: 2282 Eastview Drive Requests: Approval of Final Plat of Subdivision Total Acreage of Subdivision: 0.429 acres Lot Descriptions and Construction Plans: The petitioner’s Final Plat of Subdivision shows the existing 21,697.52-square foot lot being subdivided into two lots each with an area of 9,350-square feet. The Final Plat of Subdivision shows a 10-foot public utility easement and Page 2 of 16 drainage easement at the rear, a five-foot public utility easement and drainage easement on the sides, a 35-foot private building line in the front of each proposed lot and the proposed dedication of the eastern 33-feet of the property. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan There are several parts of the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan that align with the proposed project. Those portions are follows: • Under Overarching Principles: o The Comprehensive Plan seeks to promote a wider range of housing options and to encourage the reinvestment and preservation of established Des Plaines neighborhoods through the addition of new housing to fit diverse needs. The proposal seeks to reinvest in this vacant lot and provide additional housing options in this established neighborhood. • Under Land Use Plan: o A primary goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance established single- family neighborhoods while also expanding housing options. The proposal matches the existing character of the neighborhood and provides new housing options. • Under Future Land Use Map: o The property is marked for Single-Family Residential land uses. These areas are designated for detached single-family residences to maintain and improve housing options for residents. The proposed use will transform an existing residential lot with one residence and provide an additional single-family housing option for the community as a whole. While the aforementioned bullet points are only a small portion of the Comprehensive Plan, there is a large emphasis on maintaining detached single-family zoning areas and promoting the expansion of these developments to increase housing options for residents. The petitioner is proposing to take a 0.500-acre parcel with one residence and add another residence for the community. Recommendation: I recommend approval of the Final Plat of Subdivision pursuant to 13-2 of the Des Plaines Subdivision Ordinance and Variation requests pursuant to Section 12-3-6 of the Des Plaines Zoning Ordinance, as amended with the following conditions: 1. The portion of the property within the prescribed Eastview Drive roadway shall be dedicated to the City of Des Plaines, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works and Engineering and prior to the issuance of any building/site improvement permit. 2. The site plan provided for the new homes will be non-binding. No approval is being given to the proposed site plan as part of this application. All proposed private improvements shall be approved via a building permit/site improvement permit. 3. That all drawings comply with all applicable codes. Such drawings and final plat documents may have to be amended to comply with standards, regulations and ordinances, which can be accomplished at time of applying for a Final Plat of Subdivision. 4. Any bond or warranty required by the City of Des Plaines shall be produced and posted prior to recording the Final Plat of Subdivision. Planning and Zoning Board Procedure: Under Section 13-2-7 (Approval of Final Plat By Planning and Zoning Board) of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 12-3-6 (Approval of Variations), the Planning and Page 3 of 16 Zoning Board has the authority to recommend that the City Council approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny the above-mentioned Final Plat of Subdivision requests for the property at 2282 Eastview Drive. The City Council has final authority over the proposal. Attachments: Attachment 1: Project Narrative Attachment 2: Location Map Attachment 3: Plat of Survey Attachment 4: Proposed Site Plan Attachment 5: Final Plat of Subdivision Attachment 6: Final Engineering Drawings Attachment 7: Landscape Plan Attachment 8: Site and Context Photos Page 4 of 16 February 25th, 2020 Application for Final Plat of Subdivision of existing parcel of land with dimension of 220.00' by 100.00' into two (2) lots of record (50.00' by 187.00' with area of 9,341 sq ft each) and dedication east part of land (33.00' by 100.00') for public right-of-way. Commonly known as 2282 Eastview Dr There were no changes to the request or the plans since the Tentative Plat of Subdivision. . This property is located North of Touhy Avenue and West of Mannheim Road. The parcel is improved with 1 ½ story house with an attached garage and a driveway on the site. The property is 100’ x 220’ in size (21,980 sq. ft.). The lot is zoned R-1 single family. The owner wishes to divide the property into two 50’ x 187’ lots. The existing garage and the existing residence will not comply with the proposed setback requirements for this zoning. The owner is asking for variances to the 5ft. side yard setback and the 25ft. front yard setback. Since the existing garage will encroach into the required side yard setback by 2.48’ and the existing house will encroach into the proposed front yard setback by 2.20’ Attachment 1 Page 5 of 16 �-_j I .J MapOfficen• 2282 Eastview Drive l_ --.r �J.._ • • • • --• • .J • • • - ... ------- E Touhy Ave ... Mapct�t-edon >.ia.rcb. 4,2020. ®2020 GISC:00--�tiu.roa.nd MGP blc. All Ri_ghtiR.e--�� Th:eGISCoir:i0rtittt1andMGPinc.creno1lic.blebranyu;Y-miswzmooifimionor�isclmweofanym:.ppro"i�W!d:f2.pplieeblelew. • E,oahy-1 Di$.Clai::i:er: Thh:m.p h bf g�:m.1 i.l".b::rs.:tion �only. Altllough tlle i.l".b::rs.:tion h be.li:ev-ed to be g�:m.lly acrunt-e. errotS::rsay exht and tlleu,-�should i.m1-�W.tlycot'J btaccur, •. cy.The:m.p�notc01'.stirut�aregu.litory�t-er.:ni.l"..ationa.ndhnotab¥>:btengi.n�.ngdoign.AReght-e1-edW.dSutv�-orshouldbe.c01'sult-edto�t-er.:ni.nepr:<.iv. location bo'w!dari�on tlle g't'()'W!d. Attachment 2 Page 6 of 16 AB B R E V I A T I O N S : At t a c h m e n t 3 Page 7 of 16 B c 5 & 8 ; 9 C c A # c 5& 8 ; 9 D c , H 9 ; , B c c >+ ; 9 & c c c ' M c c c B^ \ _ V ` [ \ ] c SU U \ V ] ] c c & c 2 S T X ] [ Z c 8 [ \ \ W ] c , , c &8 , 5 c BF A G & N - 9 * = & ; > ; ; 5 , 9 " " ; 8 c # ) A& D W W / ? : 8 W <- < & W -> : 7 W < . < & W ?& ! > 9 $ #> : A A 79 C # , #, - 8 W 3 - 8 0 W ( & 7 # & W M: : $ W (& 7 # & W .? : 8 W ( & 7 # & W 3W ? # W 3& 8 * C + 8 3 W R W 8: > C + & ? 3 R ?W W ? $ . J A W A 3 W R W W A : J C + & ? 3 R W #, W #, : ? $ W 3 & 8 * F & 3 W R W & A C & ? 3 R U W >& # : ? $ W L 3 J & N 3 W RW PA E ? 3 R T W 6& A J ? & $ W L 3 J & W DR < W CR < / # 3 W < J $ W c <J ! 3 - # W J G 3 . H W c $? . 7 * & W & A & 5 & 8 C W EL c c E < ? c < ( c I 1 : $ < I c K 6 6 c C ( W C; < W : ( W ( : K 8 $ G : 8 B" 5 & c c , 9 " + c & @ F 5 B c a & D c #, B D 9 " & B c A & c 8 A 3 & # c - 9 c ' & & D c 9 # c # & " , 8 5 c > A D B c D+ & A & ; ' c ;A # & A& # c N c #A J 9 c N c 4 !c BF A G & N & # c N c O P c !b Q % Q ) c RR R R R R c Q c ;A # & A c 9; c B+ % W 7 9 > B + W + 1 ' W 9 ' W B+ % W O @ B % > 2 R W W ' % % B W 9 ' W B+ % W & @ B % > 2 R W W ' % % B W 9 ' W B + % W @ 9 I B + % > 1 R W W ' % % B W 9' W B + % W 7 9 > B + % > 2 R W W ' % % B W 9 ' W B + % W @ 9 I B +M % @ B W = I > B % > W 9 ' W B+ % W @9 I B + O @ B W =I > B % > W 9 ' W @ % " B - 9 7 W W B 9 Q @ + - < W W 79 > B + W > 7 ) % W W % @ BW 9 ' W B + % W B + - > $ W <> - 7 " - < 2 W 5 % > - $ - 7 W -7 W " 9 9 0 W "9 I 7 B R W .4 4 - 7 9 - @ W VW () @ V ;@ g 8 < ! g % g 7 g $ g ? A g K H g P@ 9 g [ g " ' g e g 4 R g ? I g _ g & # . , " 0 " g g MJ g P B ? @ G g X Tg U 3 , ) 2 g C3 c ( - 1 / g Lg ] ^ & - + g N g * g D g O g V ba g g > 4 Eg @ 6S Tg g g g f g d g g g W W W SW " ! ) & " ) ) $ " ) ! ) " ) ) ) ) ' ) " ! " ! ) ! ) ) % ) ) ) $ ! ) ! ! " ) ) ) $ ) % ) ) ! $ ! ) ) " ) ) ! 9: Z = @ ` g ?Q F W Y 5 \ g BDD&c ;'c ,55,9;,Bc ";F9CNc ;'c #F>*&c,c 3&99&C+c c 3&99&#Nc #;c +&A& Nc BDD&c D+Dc -c +G&c >A &>A&#c D+&c B.C&c >59c #&>-"D&#c +&A&;9c D+-Bc >79c A&>A&B&9CBc D+&c ";9 #Y9Bc ';F9#c Dc D+&c D-8&c ;'c >A&>&AC,;9c ;'c B,#c >5 9c 5&8;9Dc ,H9;-Bc -55-9;,Bc >A;'&BB /;95c 59#c BFAG&N;Ac 9;c c 8Nc 5,"&9B&c &M>0 A&Bc c At t a c h m e n t 4 Page 8 of 16 OW N E R SU R V E Y O R MA Y O R PL A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G B O A R D DI R E C T O R O F F I N A N C E DI R E C T O R O F P U B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G EA S E M E N T P R O V I S I O N S DR A I N A G E “ ” “ ” “”“” “ ” “ ” “” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ”“”“ ” DE D I C A T I O N S T A T E M E N T At t a c h m e n t 5 Page 9 of 16 At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 10 of 16 At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 11 of 16 At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 12 of 16 ··· · CI T Y O F D E S P L A I N E S PU B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T 14 2 0 M I N E R S T R E E T DE S P L A I N E S , I L 6 0 0 1 6 PH O N E - 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 3 9 0 F A X 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 6 1 9 WW W . D E S P L A I N E S . O R G PLAN AND PROFILE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILSBLSA D TPO 10 1 15HORI N A VERT N A 1 OF 1 -- - - - - - - At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 13 of 16 TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL ALL SEWER AND WATER (EXCEPT PVC)ALL TRENCH BACKFILL WILL BE MEASURED USING THE IDOT TRENCH BACKFILL TABLESTRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL PVC SEWERALL TRENCH BACKFILL WILL BE MEASURED USING THE IDOT TRENCH BACKFILL TABLES CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIAL TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL ALL SEWER AND WATER (EXCEPT PVC)CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIAL TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL PVC SEWER CI T Y O F D E S P L A I N E S PU B L I C W O R K S A N D E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T 14 2 0 M I N E R S T R E E T DE S P L A I N E S , I L 6 0 0 1 6 PH O N E - 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 3 9 0 F A X 8 4 7 - 3 9 1 - 5 6 1 9 WW W . D E S P L A I N E S . O R G DETAIL SHEET C5.0 At t a c h m e n t 6 Page 14 of 16 C ' @ I n X lg LOT 2 (EUGENE 11C1UGa 2nd ADO. 10 DES PlAINEsREC. .U.Y 14, 2004 MJ DOC. f 0411181808!) u .. '" -"- . J � a-D-D-0--0--0-CI-D- -<AMf JI [EJ. 8 00 a 0 .,.; 14.00' PORCH EL=647.50 J 48' 0 0 .,.; o,:-]' 8.00' •-•-220.00' sa1-04• 40•w u a 0 ci 15' u 187.00' 9.1t T "V " T N [ NG 'J/ l. MT # 212 � R' 1/' ' ' RAM �I N, ffL R 19 )' PROP. 8 FT. WIDE ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 82.50' PROPOSED RESIDENCE W/BSMT T/F=646.90 FF=647.98 .. J7.0o' e4a ,, ' 187,00' " AM t1U1 NG 2L9( 0 JNC 'c GM DijO (3) 1 GAL SUMMER BEAUTY ALLIUM (5) 24" DE NSE YEW 36" COMPACT BURNING BUSH ✓I 'II \Y 0 0 N N I i ------r i ' I II II II II II II II . :./l;:;';1�:jSOOAA -, J I J I j i .,...._--r--., 2½" GREEN JI 1 MOUNTAIN JSUGAR MAPLl J I J I jj is,I -�2½" GREEN JI ,Q� MOUNTAIN I �0 SUGAR MAPLS <n AUGEr_/JNDER EXIST. EAST EfW DR. I J I j i I I ' II II II I ' II II II II I Attachment 7 Page 15 of 16 2282 Eastview Drive – Public Notice and Front of Property 2282 Eastview Drive – Looking West at Front of Property 2282 Eastview Drive – Looking Northwest at Full Property 2282 Eastview Drive – Looking Southwest at Front of Property A t t a c h m e n t 8 P a g e 1 6 o f 1 6